Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Israel

Israel Raids Hospital

Plus: Moscow subway stations, climate activists souping and glueing, Rachel Dolezal's plight, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 2.15.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Nasser hospital | Ismael Mohamad/UPI/Newscom
(Ismael Mohamad/UPI/Newscom)

Raid in Gaza: News broke this morning that the Israeli military is beginning its raid of Khan Younis' Nasser Hospital, in the Gaza Strip. The BBC reported that one trauma surgeon said, from inside the building, that "tanks and snipers" currently surround the hospital from "all directions."

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have told all people inside the hospital to evacuate immediately so that it can begin its raid.

The Israeli military reports that it has intelligence—including testimony from now-released hostages—that indicates that Hamas is using Nasser Hospital as an important spot for its military operations, which would be in keeping with the well-established pattern of Hamas using civilians, including the sick and wounded, as human shields. There is some belief among the Israeli military that either living captives or the bodies of hostages might be located at Nasser Hospital.

Meanwhile, Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry officials claim that the IDF's operation has destroyed critical areas of the hospital, crippling its operations and harming displaced people who were sheltering there.

Both could be true, and Israel must continue weighing whether raids like these are worth the cost—a situation it's been forced into in part due to Hamas' callous disregard for human life.

Meanwhile, on the Israel-Lebanon border, things are heating up. Israel reportedly killed 10 Lebanese civilians in strikes overnight, while Iran-backed Hezbollah has been launching more and more rockets (including one that killed an Israeli soldier on Tuesday).

Climate activists wreaking havoc on D.C. this week: In case you missed it—and I dearly hope you did—climate activists dumped red powder on the case holding the U.S. Constitution, in the rotunda of the National Archives, yesterday. "We are determined to foment a rebellion. We will not be held account to laws in which we have no voice or representation," said one of the activists. "This country's founded on the conditions that all men are created…and endowed with the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," said the other. "We're calling for all people to have all these rights, not just wealthy white men. We all deserve clean air, water, food, and a livable climate."

They were promptly arrested, but they weren't the only vandals on the loose.

Climate activist group Declare Emergency has activated several groups this week (the Constitution-desecraters are purportedly affiliated), with one set of protesters blocking traffic on D.C.'s George Washington Parkway. Some drivers got confrontational with them, including one woman who said her son was in the hospital. "I don't got time for this shit," she added.

In recent years, climate activists have seemingly grown emboldened, throwing cans of soup on the Mona Lisa at the Louvre; gluing themselves to Johannes Vermeer's Girl With a Pearl Earring at Mauritshuis museum in The Hague; and gluing themselves to Vincent van Gogh's Peach Trees in Blossom at London's Courtauld Gallery. Just yesterday, climate protesters targeted Sandro Botticelli's Birth of Venus in Florence's Uffizi Gallery:

#DeclareEmergency allies @UltimaGenerazi1 were also active this Valentine's Day!

Climate activists target Botticelli's 'Birth of Venus' in Florence's Uffizi Gallery @a22network #NoArtOnADeadPlanethttps://t.co/jYkEfSC7rh

— Declare Emergency (@DecEmergency) February 14, 2024

It's not clear who is helped by all this—having cars idle in traffic, due to human street blockages doesn't really seem to help stop climate change—but the incidents do seem to be growing in frequency.


Scenes from New York: "A Plush Dog, Samurai Sword and 42,439 Guns: Inside an N.Y.P.D. Basement," from The New York Times, is worth your time.


QUICK HITS

  • Tucker Carlson is now releasing the strangest short videos, set to classical music, praising Moscow's subway system, which was built by Joseph Stalin in order to…impress foreigners. But even if you concede that the Moscow subway system is beautiful, Carlson seems to take this as airtight proof that Russian President Vladimir Putin knows how to govern. I do not take the same lesson from this. It is possible that Putin, following in the footsteps of Stalin, merely prioritizes devoting state resources (and harsh enforcement) to maintaining the opulent stations at the expense of many other priorities.
  • "Zoning shifted the focus of city planning from stewarding the public realm to managing private development," wrote M. Nolan Gray in The Atlantic. "The forebears of professional planners were unconcerned with land uses and densities, allowing mixed-use neighborhoods to emerge. But zoning remade cities into a fragmented landscape of malls, office parks, and residential subdivisions."
  • This is, uh, not the right takeaway from the Fani Willis scandal, by The New York Times:

???? pic.twitter.com/UipdwZ84Yn

— Kmele ???? (@kmele) February 14, 2024

  • Rachel Dolezal, who made headlines years ago for identifying as black despite being born to white parents, recently lost her teaching job over her OnlyFans account.
  • Does Tom Suozzi's Long Island congressional seat flip tell Democrats how they ought to message on immigration?
  • Japan's economy is in trouble.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Your Car Is Spying on You

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

IsraelPalestineWarClimate ChangeActivismNYPDPoliceTucker CarlsonDonald TrumpRussiaReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (465)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

    Israel Raids Hospital

    I hope they brought enough fuel for the generators.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Only 6 more hours left.

      1. damikesc   1 year ago

        If only rockets had something to provide power to generators.

        If only...

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          You mean generators ran by Gazans who all died of kidney failure and thirst on October 11 from drinking sea water?
          🙂
          😉

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Enough for eight crazy weeks of Gazanukkah.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Rachel Dolezal, who made headlines years ago for identifying as black despite being born to white parents, recently lost her teaching job over her OnlyFans account.

    Fucking racists.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Keeping the black woman down.

      1. damikesc   1 year ago

        And during Black History Month to boot.

      2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

        Amd thankfully, out of Spokane.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Her fans or her parents? I mean how racist is it for two white people to produce a black woman trapped in a white body?

      1. Anomalous   1 year ago

        Maybe she could have race-affirming surgery.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Any money in that?

          1. Dillinger   1 year ago

            ask Michael Jackson oh wait

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        That must be the fetish her OnlyFans is for.

    3. R Mac   1 year ago

      The pics are…not impressive. I really can’t comprehend why anyone would pay to see them.

      1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

        People also like to rubberneck while driving past grisly car wrecks. I suspect it’s a similar motivation.

  3. Ajsloss   1 year ago

    Johannes Vermeer's Girl With a Pearl Earring

    I'd rather see Scarlett Johansson's Girl With a Pearl Necklace.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      *Puts hands on hips*

      "Oh, Ajsloss!"

    2. Anomalous   1 year ago

      Where is that hanging?

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        The question afterwards would be: "How's it hanging?"
        🙂
        😉

      2. Dillinger   1 year ago

        by my left knee.

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          question well, that answers both of our questions.
          🙂
          😉

  4. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have told all people inside the hospital to evacuate immediately so that it can begin its raid.

    They could learn a thing or two from US law enforcement. RPG's are probably being flushed down the toilet as we speak.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      I think we tried that with M80s in middle school.

      1. Anomalous   1 year ago

        That would make me evacuate immediately.

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          Evacuate in the pants from fright?
          🙂
          😉

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      They already cut the water months ago, and the hospital only has two days left. And besides Hamas wouldn't waste precious resources needed for all Gazans to survive and destroy the environment by improper disposable of arms.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      They can't flush anything. The Israelis cut off all the water and every Gazan died of kidney failure and thirst, remember?
      🙂
      😉

  5. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    We are determined to foment a rebellion.

    Rebellion against the ecoterrorist agenda? I hope so.

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      I am impressed that a call for rebellion IS NOT "insurrection".

    2. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

      This is DC.
      The DA wont charge them.
      A jury wouldn't find them guilty.
      A judge wouldn't sentence them but would force taxpayers to compensate them for their arrests.

  6. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago (edited)

    The climate "activists" should be treated as the terrorists they are

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      I wanted someone to walk up and beat the shit out of both of them. Add some red liquid to the red powder.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        So much this. And especially for the idiots that glued their hand to things. Free shots!

    2. damikesc   1 year ago

      Nah. Government needs to reel back the "terrorism" definition significantly.

      They are absolutely vandals. And mass civil suits against the groups by motorists and businesses need to happen.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        My proposed solution: have someone with a diesel pickup back up to them and do a rolling coal.

        Particularly the ones that glue themselves to the pavement.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          I saw one once, but damned if I can't find it now. The driver turned around and reversed toward the activists. Then he blew rolling coal onto them. They left the roadway in a hurry, IIRC.

      2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        They literally call themselves ecoterrorists

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          If the cement shoes fit...

        2. mad.casual   1 year ago (edited)

          And, even if you think they shouldn't be shipped off to Gitmo or whatever, they’re rather overt that their assembly and/or speech is specifically not peaceful.

          1. damikesc   1 year ago

            Anything done to them will be tenfold to conservatives.

            The government went from spying on foreign nationals to spying on people who give to churches.

            1. mad.casual   1 year ago

              The government was shooting the wives of white supremacists and precipitating/causing the murder of religious families on their compounds a decade before it was using 'terrorism' to spy on people. 'Terrorism' may've helped get the surveillance state off the ground but once aloft, the word 'terrorism' didn't matter one whit to the people fundamentally opposed to bitter clingers and deplorables. They would just change the definitions in real time anyway, if they even bothered at all.

      3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        My attitude is that they are adults with agency, that they have purposely, with intent, placed themselves in harm's way, like mountain climbers or soldiers, and that it is the duty of drivers to honor their wishes and run over them, and the duty of court systems to award such drivers with the sacrificial heroes' estate.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Unfortunately, anything short of a Jeep Wrangler or a lifted 4x4 pickup might get high centered running over these fleshy speed bumps.

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

            I am all in favor of the heavier vehicles with the high pressure tires. I believe big rig tires are 100 psi or so.

          2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            One ton dually with a snowplow. Don't even have to run the little fuckers over.

      4. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        They are doing their crimes for political motives, so yeah, it's terrorism, and an especially evil form of terrorism, since their goal of human using "No More Oil" would exterminate much of our species from pre-Industrial squalor, disease, and starvation.

  7. Zeb   1 year ago

    The Moscow subway stations are pretty beautiful. Which is interesting because most of the above ground Soviet architecture is pretty brutal and ugly. They are also amazingly deep (I think so they can be used as bomb/fallout shelters).

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      PUTIN LOVER!!!

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        But even if you concede that the Moscow subway system is beautiful, Carlson seems to take this as airtight proof that Russian President Vladimir Putin knows how to govern. I do not take the same lesson from this. It is possible that Putin, following in the footsteps of Stalin, merely prioritizes devoting state resources (and harsh enforcement) to maintaining the opulent stations at the expense of many other priorities.

        Right about now, Nardz is calling our sweet Liz a worthless cunt and a "Race Traitor.". Oh well, fuck him.

      2. Zeb   1 year ago

        It was still Yeltsin when I visited Moscow.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          YELTSIN LOVER!

        2. Dillinger   1 year ago

          so it was you who blew up Nordstream ...

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Yes, some of the deeper stations built in the 1950s were meant to double as fallout shelters. The Brits had a hand in the first parts of the Metro and the first stations as the Russians tasked with building the Metro were impressed with the London Underground of the time (1920s-1930s).

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        As Werner Keller put it in his book title, East Minus West Equals Zero.

    3. Ron   1 year ago

      and Russia uses "Harsh Penalties" how harsh are we talking about? are they canning people or just making them pay a fine and jail unlike here in the U.S. where you can do anything including rape and murder with no consequences unless you are of the wrong political party.

    4. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago (edited)

      Yeah, and they saw all run on time.

      Well, it looks to me like Tucker Carlson never got his train set for Christmas or has fantasies of being Shimbleshanks The Railway Cat, just like all the Eco-Wackos who who fawn over mass transit.

      Shimbleshanks The Railway Cat Part 1 from Cats, The Musical
      https://youtu.be/XEIiqhx3BSk?si=E9WOMsvTjRPIe_XX

      Shimbleshanks The Railway Cat Part 1 from Cats, The Musical
      https://youtu.be/10XhZrhqXyM?si=bKo33KRoVWsIOaZa

      🙂
      😉

    5. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      They've been world famous for almost a century and got their initial start before the Soviets. They're like visiting Notre-Dame, or the Sagrada Família, or Buckingham Palace, except they're underground.

      But here we have pissants pretending it's the Boston Metro.

  8. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago (edited)

    climate activists dumped red powder on the case holding the U.S. Constitution, in the rotunda of the National Archives, yesterday.

    And everyone just stood around and did nothing, including that fat masked security “agent”.

    I wanted someone, anyone to walk up and break a couple noses.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Someone should have told him they were MAGA. The red spurting everywhere wouldn't be powder then.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Fire extinguisher powder?

  9. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Alt right journalists Taibbi and Shellenberger are out with a report that Obama ordered 5 Eyes to spy on Trump campaign. Believe this is the document at the heart of the Mar A Lago raid despite Trump order declassifying all documents related to spying on him on 2016.

    https://public.substack.com/p/cia-had-foreign-allies-spy-on-trump?publication_id=279400&post_id=141639574&isFreemail=false&r=tcvy9

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Zero surprises there. Even Sarcasmic probably suspected in his heart they were after documents that indicted them.

      "Alt right journalists Taibbi and Shellenberger"

      The last five years have been so weird.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        I had to add alt right so sarc could dismiss it and claim no facts ever existed.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          No, no, they really call Bar Weiss, Greenwald, Taibbi, Shellenberger, etc. alt-right now, even though they're positions haven't changed one iota from when they were left.

          I just saw someone call Russell Brand a far-right extremist for calling for an investigation into big pharma's government ties. Imagine trying to explain that to someone from 15 years ago.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Oh I agree. It is the excuse sarc used to rationalize why he was wrong. The left treats yells of alt right like an evangelist blames everything on the devil.

          2. HorseConch   1 year ago

            Don't forget Rogan. He's about as far right as the media can see.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              That evil Bernie Bro!

              1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

                Soon even Bernie will be ‘alt right’.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                  "Alt right" is essentially anyone the establishment doesn't like.

                  1. HorseConch   1 year ago

                    Pretty sure RFK Jr is also Alt-Right.

                    1. Dillinger   1 year ago

                      I'm shocked you can understand anything he says

                2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                  That's convenient, since then the shooter that was radicalized by Bernie can just be labeled alt right, increasing the numbers of alt right violence.

      2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        It is the smear to label any dissent from the Regime's narrative, because the Right is bad, and "Alt Right" is super bad.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      I saw that and the vicious nature of the raid and follow-up make more sense.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        So basically the court case is to cover for the raid and discredit Trump further until they have to drop it, and hopefully he'll just want it to be over and not want his documents back..

        1. HorseConch   1 year ago

          I can't wait for him to release them to the public. No way that he didn't make copies of them while in his possession.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Never underestimate Trump's ability to fuck things up.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              What are you taking for your TDS?

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                OK, Sevo. Is Trump really some kind of saint for you? Do you bristle at any slight against him? Does he really represent perfection in thought and deed?

              2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                No, he's right. Trump has great direction, but he was naïve as hell and time and time again trusted and listened to weasels he should not have. Listening to Fauci is one great example.

          2. R Mac   1 year ago

            When/if he does, the media will call it Russian disinfo and all the useful idiots will believe them.

    3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "President Barack Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan, had identified 26 Trump associates for the Five Eyes to target"

      Why Brennan is out of jail instead of doing the CNN circuit is still is a mystery. He's the one who pushed the Steele Dossier even though he knew at the time it was cooked up and he's the one who helped start the letter that claimed the Hunter Laptop was a Russian op.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        CNN and MSNBC having people like John Brennan, James Comey, and James Clapper on as ‘experts’ is like if the networks in 1973-74 had Haldeman and Ehrlichman on to pontificate about Watergate.”

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Wanna bet the network execs dreamed about that?

    4. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Yeah, this is getting so much less attention than it deserves. It’s Watergate times 5.

      Remember how Watergate was basically the greatest political scandal of the 20th century? Obama did the exact same thing, only the press let him get away with the cover up. And now Trump is being prosecuted for trying to declassify information related to it. Imagine if the press had tried to silence and throw Deep Throat in jail for disclosing classified information.

      The Blessed Redeemer himself, Prince Obama, used foreign spies to go after a friend political opponent. There’s no mitigating what this means.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        He didnt try. He sent an order to declassify that the DoJ ran the clock out on.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Odd how Watergate, the scandal of the century at the time and resulting in the resignation of the Leader of the Free World, did not deter a Democrat President whatsoever.

        In the least.

        If only John Dean had used active duty CIA and FBI people and foreign intelligence agencies to spy on Nixon’s political opponents instead of the retired Hunt and Liddy.

        But of course this won't be a shocking scandal impacting freedom and democracy unless some Republican president tries to copy it.

        1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

          When Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate a scandal involving Burisma, of course, that was impeachment worthy. Obama asking allied nations to spy on everyone associated with Trump, and it's such a non-story that CNN has nothing to say about it, not even a blurb.

          https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/15/politics/cnn-report-missing-binder-trump-russia/index.html

          That is the closest I can find to CNN acknowledging it, and look at how it's absolute spin. And now they're just ignoring the latest revelations from Taibbi and Shellenberger.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            When I say it's fascist I'm not resorting to hyperbole. These are some of the biggest scandals and attacks on democracy in American history, and it's suppressed by a voluntary news blackout that even our purported libertarian magazine is in on.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Amazing what a captive and allied fourth estate can do for you.

        1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

          They’re not journalists. They’re just DNC propaganda organizations.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          The Reason coverage will be great though I’m sure.

      4. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Yeah, this is getting so much less attention than it deserves. It’s Watergate times 5.

        Even this is generously divorcing intrinsic links. That is, Obama wasn't spying to keep himself as President and the person who succeeded him in the party was his own VP. The Obama(/Biden) Administration(s), serially and collectively, is (are) well beyond Watergate x 10,000 levels.

    5. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Nice read, is there more that I need to subscribe to read? Highly doubt the ascertain that Mars Lago raid docs are one in the same. If Trump had access to them as president, he'd have declassify them and have charges against Brennan drafted while in office instead of leaving them in unsecure boxes. But crazier things have happened.

      Hopefully though this all comes to light and Brennan ends up flipping on Obama. Love for him to spend some time in the clink.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

        He did declassify.

        https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-declassification-certain-materials-related-fbis-crossfire-hurricane-investigation/

        DoJ slow rolled the release past Jan 20th.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          I remember this at the time, and some hearing about a year ago? Have you heard any updates on it becoming public recently?

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            Pretty sure the stuff that wasn't released at the time would have been reclassified by Biden. Anything that's embarrassing to the Obama administration is just as embarrassing to him. What we've got now are people like Taibbi and Shellenberger interviewing people who saw it at the time, and finally getting a large enough consensus on what the documents contained that they feel confident to release it now.

            Ie, they're doing actual journalism, which is making them enemies of the established media.

            Reason, which has historically been against the MIC and government secrets in general, really needs to pick up this story and run with it.

            1. mad.casual   1 year ago

              Anything that’s embarrassing to the Obama administration is just as embarrassing to him.

              +1 As indicated above, the Twitter Files alone were massive on a scale that utterly dwarfs Watergate. The combination of Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, Hunter's Laptop, The Steele Dossier, Wuhan GOF research, The Clinton Foundation, all the 10% for 'The Big Guy' woven in... it's corruption on a scale unprecedented in American history. To pretend it's not and continue to just repeat that Biden and Trump are approximately equally unpopular is a disservice to the citizenry, journalism, onesself, and even just plain cognitive function. As Taibbi, Shellenberger, Pool, Greenwald, et al. have demonstrated, you don't have to particularly like Trump or in any way endorse him to recognize how abjectly terrible this behind-the-scenes deep bureaucrat State collusion is for freedom and Western Democracy.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                Do you even boaf sidez bro?

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                  He's not sarcasmic, so I'm guessing "no". 😉

              2. DesigNate   1 year ago (edited)

                Those are all conspiracy theories and all those journalist are right-wing Trump humpers. – the usual suspects

                (Edit: fuck you autochange, I wrote what I wrote)

      2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        If you want to listen to Taibbi talking about it, here's a youtube link:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSRszPj1WKA

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

          Thanks and that includes Jessie's follow up.

    6. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      Now, multiple credible sources tell Public and Racket that the United States Intelligence Community (IC), including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), illegally mobilized foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisors long before the summer of 2016.

      This whole thing is based on anonymous sources that we are told are "credible". So I guess we are back to uncritically accepting anonymous sources as long as they say things that feel good.

      1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        Taibbi is at least able to substantiate it by connecting it to things that are public knowledge. And Taibbi at least carries some general degree of credibility himself for his previous body of good investigative work.

        This is not a story that's being rushed out there, either. If they were trying to pounce on a story to exploit a hot news cycle, the time to go forward on this was at least three years ago, if not more. It's an old story that they've been digging into for a very long time to try to get to the truth.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

          Taibbi is at least able to substantiate it by connecting it to things that are public knowledge.

          Yes, he is very helpfully "connecting the dots" for you in the context of the narrative he wishes you to believe. How nice of him!

          Do you not see this? Do you not see that the amount of actual *factual* reporting above is near zero? And that the rest of it is just connect-the-dots narrative pushing?

          his previous body of good investigative work.

          Wait, Taibbi has had *good* investigative work? The only investigative work that I've seen from him has been sloppy and narrative-driven. Such as the above.

          1. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

            So unless Salon, NYTimes, or NPR publishes the story, you will continue to shout, "not credible?"

          2. R Mac   1 year ago

            Here’s Lying Jeffy pretending we don’t already know the Steele Dossier was fake and paid for by Hillary Clinton, that members of the IC are on record discussing how to get Trump out of office, and that the FBI lied on FISA warrants.

            To bad for Lying Jeffy every one here besides sarc knows he’s a dishonest shitweasel.

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

        Sigh. No Jeff, you don’t have to accept anything.

        And you won’t. Lol.

      3. R Mac   1 year ago

        Haha, Lying Jeffy’s turning into sarc. Makes sense, since they’ve been best buds sarc’s become more of a liar.

    7. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      And I just love this conspiracy theory that you all have conjured up. Evidently, Trump took documents that purportedly showed that Obama had spied on him, possibly illegally, the FBI knew that, and THAT is why they raided Mar-a-Lago, because they were afraid of those documents going public? Really?

      If Trump had in his possession documents which said that Obama illegally spied on him, why wouldn't he immediately make them all public the moment he read them? Why would he store them in boxes in his bathroom and just leave them there and not tell anyone?

      Furthermore, if this was such an illegal off-the-books spying assignment, why would there be any documentation about it at all that could incriminate anyone?

      This conspiracy theory of yours makes no sense, but it very readily satisfies two of your narrative objectives: 1. make Obama out to be as villainous as possible, and 2. make Trump out to be as much of a victim as possible, and rationalize and justify why he kept all those documents that he wasn't supposed to.

      1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        And I just love this conspiracy theory that you all have conjured up. Evidently, Trump took documents that purportedly showed that Obama had spied on him, possibly illegally, the FBI knew that, and THAT is why they raided Mar-a-Lago, because they were afraid of those documents going public? Really?

        This is literally the establishment narrative, though the FBI and administration are denying that the FBI was particularly interested in this binder during the Mar-a-Lago raid.

        https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/15/politics/cnn-report-missing-binder-trump-russia/index.html

        This is the CNN link I posted earlier. There IS a missing binder, Trump WAS actively working on getting it properly redacted so he could declassify it. It wasn't found in the Mar-a-Lago raid, but it's considered missing.

        CNN certainly spins it a bit differently, but the core facts are all undisputed. But then, maybe CNN is just fake news as well, now?

        1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago (edited)

          I mean, consider what the latest allegations are: That the US was requesting foreign intelligence commit espionage on a rival politician’s campaign without a legitimate national security interest. If that’s true, is it such a big leap to jump to the fact that the FBI then conducted a document raid, again without legitimate purpose, for the sake of covering up the inappropriate and illegal use of intelligence assets?

          You can call it conspiratorial nonsense all you like. That phrase, “conspiracy theory,” doesn’t have the same punch it did four years ago.

          Also, aren’t you at least concerned that it’s possible that the CIA was doing something inappropriate in trying to fabricate a scandal against an American politician? It’s not like Obama was too virtuous to let this stuff happen on his watch; we learned that from Snowden about all the warrantless surveillance the NSA was conducting and actively lying about.

          Taibbi himself concedes that this wasn’t necessarily politically motivated-not for all involved, anyway. A lot of people doing this were just interested in breaking something that was potentially big, finding some major revelation and feeling validated in their jobs and positions by the sense of accomplishment. That’s a lot of how I see the government’s general malfeasances occurring, people wanting to do something significant to justify their positions in government and having too much belief in their own righteousness to worry about trampling over rights.

          1. HorseConch   1 year ago

            It was very apparent this shit was going on when Trump took to twitter to announced he had been wire tapped and there was no denial of it. That's the kind of batshit crazy talk that would elicit a strong denial from anyone with any ability to do it if it weren't true.

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

            If that’s true

            Based on the evidence provided thus far, I don't believe it is true.

            It IS conspiratorial nonsense whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.

            Also, aren’t you at least concerned that it’s possible that the CIA was doing something inappropriate in trying to fabricate a scandal against an American politician?

            This sounds phony-baloney to me. Not because I think Obama is virtuous, but because it sounds like the plot of a Tom Clancy novel - i.e., dreamed up as a narrative to be easily sold to people who want to believe it to be true, rather than based on solid objective evidence.

            In my opinion, a story that *just so happens* to agree with all of the reader's personal biases, is probably false.

            1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago (edited)

              You do know that Crossfire Hurricane was a real thing, right? It was neither invented by me, nor Trump, nor Matt Taibbi.

              And did you even look at the Durham report? Was the FBI being entirely truthful to the FISA court? Surely you recognize that there’s a lot of information which has already been substantiated.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                Lying Jeffy will never acknowledge any of this.

                Note when you break it down to simple, inarguable points (that are corroborating evidence to the reporting in the OP) Lying Jeffy runs away.

          3. R Mac   1 year ago

            “Also, aren’t you at least concerned that it’s possible that the CIA was doing something inappropriate in trying to fabricate a scandal against an American politician?”

            If the politician is on the right, no, he’s not concerned.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

          It is not the 'establishment narrative' that the FBI conducted a raid on Mar-a-Lago as a cover-up for some illegal Obama spying operation. That is your (and Taibbi's) kooky fantasy.

          1. Dillinger   1 year ago (edited)

            wasn’t a cover-up it was a open raid. ignore why at your peril.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              He doesn’t ignore it at his peril, he ignores it for fifty cents a post.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...from The New York Times, is worth your time.

    But I doubt my subscription dollars.

    1. The Margrave of Azilia   1 year ago

      Paywalled for me - I suppose the message is that Everything is Racist except killing black children in abortion.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        What about reparations and global socialism?

        1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

          What about reparations FOR global socialism?

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Nice! And we can bill Soros and all those little second and third generation capitalist heirs cosplaying as socialist cunts.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Liz told you to stop complaining about paywalls and how to get around it.

        Archive.is/link

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          *wonders what “punishment” liz might give me for not following directions*

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            She'll don a leather outfit and give you 30 spanks on your bare bum. then give you a hug and tell you it was for your own good.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              WTF IS UP WITH THESE PAYWALLS!

  11. JesseAz   1 year ago

    78% of democrats support kicking political opponents off ballots.

    https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/78_of_democrats_want_trump_s_name_off_the_ballot

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Saving democracy one expelled opponent at a time.

    2. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      Fortifying Our Democracy.

    3. damikesc   1 year ago

      Gotta fortify democracy and all.

      By eliminating "bad" choices from voters.

      Is that the platform of Democrats OR the mullahs of Iran.

      Must be nice for them to be on the same side as the mullahs.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Like when FDR admired Mussolini?

    4. Anomalous   1 year ago

      Democracy is only safe if the right people are allowed to run for office.

    5. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "78% of democrats support kicking political opponents off ballots."

      Totally not fascists. Nope. Nosiree.

      Also no longer fascist, attacking Jewish shops and Jews on the streets of New York, illegal spying on parent groups and Catholics, censoring political discourse on social media and political prosecutions.

    6. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Well, they started with Jill Stein (Green) in the last election.

  12. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

    "why the case against fanni Willis feels familiar to black women"

    Perhaps the reason is black people commit crime at a much higher level than the rest of the population?

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Dude, POC's are VICTIMS, not criminals!

      Especially the womens.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Her sermon of the victim a week or two ago was compelling.

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Why the Case Against Fani Willis Feels Familiar To Black Women

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      WE MADE THEM DO IT!

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Fani case is going very badly for her today. Witnesses are testifying in direct opposition to what she claimed to the court about when she started dating Wade.

    5. Dillinger   1 year ago

      "starts with how they won't use the fucking crosswalks" -- mme. dillinger

  13. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

    The 10" binder plot thickens.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/us-govt-hiding-documents-incriminate-intel-community-illegal-spying-election-interference
    US Govt Is Hiding Documents That Incriminate Intel Community For Illegal Spying & Election Interference, Say Sources

    1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Here’s where Trump really fucked up. He should have been releasing this stuff as soon as it was in hand during his Presidency. He wanted to release it all on his way out the door, but he needed to take action much sooner.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Trump never knew what he was doing. He's exactly how he seems. His biggest problem was thinking his advisors were like the ones he had in the civilian world and trusting them.

      2. Sevo   1 year ago

        Would not have made a bit of difference; organgemanbad.
        See the TDS-addled shit-piles Sullum, Brandyshit, SRG Sandy and so forth.

      3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Yeah, he made a mistake of thinking these people would actually run it through the Security Classification Guide right away instead of putting it at the bottom of the pile and ignoring it.

        If he had been smart, he'd have simple used his executive authority to de-classify, then scanned and posted the docs on his Twitter account or presidential website.

        This is probably what the Deep State is also afraid of if he actually gets back in office, that's he'll do just that instead of going through them for redactions. We should be so lucky, but while he's at it, maybe he should actually declassify everything on the JFK assassination, too, instead of blue-balling us like he did last time.

        1. HorseConch   1 year ago

          There is very little information that actually needs to be classified. I'd venture to guess that 95% of what's classified is to save embarassment and cover the asses of our so-called civil servants.

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago (edited)

            That was exactly my take from the moment the FBI started going after Trump for holding onto classified documents. It’s a problem of overclassification to get around public records and FOIA requests. The government has too many secrets and is terrified that some secrets which are embarrassing to the government might get out.

            Trump tried going through channels because he was hoping to redact personally identifying information and specific information on US Intelligence capacities, while releasing the important stuff. He relied upon the same Intelligence community he was exposing to make the appropriate redactions, and of course they refused to comply with a lame-duck president to act against their own interest. Trump couldn’t make the appropriate redactions on his own because he lacks the specific knowledge he’d need, and redacting a few hundred or few thousand pages can be onerous.

            I don’t blame Trump for not blanket releasing the whole thing because there might be a few legitimate classified bits in there that he, conscientiously, didn’t want to disclose. But he needed to get the ball rolling on this so much earlier than he did.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

              Trump tried going through channels because he was hoping to redact personally identifying information and specific information on US Intelligence capacities, while releasing the important stuff. He relied upon the same Intelligence community he was exposing to make the appropriate redactions, and of course they refused to comply with a lame-duck president to act against their own interest. Trump couldn’t make the appropriate redactions on his own because he lacks the specific knowledge he’d need, and redacting a few hundred or few thousand pages can be onerous.

              Wait wait wait. What is the source for these claims? Trump was going to personally redact thousands of pages of documents? You're kidding, right?

              1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                Trump was going to personally redact thousands of pages of documents? You’re kidding, right?

                I didn't say that. I said that Trump wanted appropriate redactions and naturally wasn't going to redact them himself, so he turned the documents over to the same service that was working to prevent the documents being released.

                Read more carefully.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago (edited)
                  1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    Fucking idiot.

                    1. R Mac   1 year ago

                      And he runs away again! And for this one he can’t pretend he got busy and didn’t respond because he actually posted and deleted.*

                      *I use “can’t” in the loosest possible way, because we all know Lying Jeffy actually can blatantly lie.

                2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                  So jeff saw the word "personally" in personally identifying information, and assumed you meant trump himself will be going through crossing shit out with a sharpie? Is that what happened?

        2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          I've said this before but there is an unredacted "missing' copy of the binder out there according to CNN. It seems a reasonable assumption that Trump either has it or knows where it is. It also seems reasonable to assume that the DOJ reached that same conclusion. Despite all of the government's shreiking about obstruction, Trump was cooperating with NARA and the FBI and allowed them to search Mar A Lago. But they didn't find what they were looking for. So they staged a SWAT raid, evicted Trump's attorney and searched even Barron's bedroom. They took a whole lot of pictures of documents to justify their criminality but they still didn't find what they were looking for. It's been recently reported that Smith is claiming that there are secret rooms at Mar A Lago that were never searched (I'll try to find a link). The conspiracy/reality theory has been that the binder blows the lid off of a whole lot of crimes by Obama and the deep state and Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger just gave the story legs.

          1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

            Here's a link
            https://www.newsweek.com/trump-hidden-room-maralago-fbi-classified-documents-1866281

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              Another piece of evidence ignored by Lying Jeffy, in a thread that’s about him claiming a lack of evidence.

              I’m sensing a pattern.

          2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            I'll tell you, the past three administrations before Biden were really telling about the nature of the bureaucratic state.

            Bush: Pro institution, and basically a government insider with lots of connections. He worked to massive expand the size and powers of government.

            Obama: Had limited political experience, serving less than one term as a senator and had been in the state legislature before that. He was politically savvy but I suspect he largely relied upon the existing intelligence and military infrastructure, mostly letting them do what they wanted because of his inexperience. As a result the institutions worked to protect him. That's how he was able to claim to be the most transparent administration in history while some of the shadiest shit imaginable was happening on his watch.

            Trump: Also a political outsider, but even moreso than Obama. However, he was anti-institution, wanting to shrink the influence of the intelligence and military apparatus. He didn't play ball with Milley on bombing Iran, he wanted to expose the shady shit the FBI and CIA had been up under Obama, so there was a no-shit resistance inside the executive departments working to undermine him during the entirety of his presidency. And now he's considered the greatest criminal in the history of the office, being charged with numerous felonies.

          3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago (edited)

            If Trump doesn’t have that binder, assuming it exists, locked up in a vault or safe room that’s nowhere near any of his actual properties, I’d be shocked. However, protection of hard copy intel isn’t the greatest thing in the world, and as the incident with that National Guard Airman showed, anyone with access to the repository can just up and walk out with it anytime they wish--people would be shocked just how much the protection of secure information works on the honor system. Unless a consistent inventory is done of physical information, people can walk out with it, or print up copies and do the same thing, if they're sneaky enough about it.

            The thing is that, once that stuff goes public, it’s pretty easy to figure out who took it and how it happened, because of all the protocols on access permissions. That’s how Bradley Manning, Reality Winner, and the Airman all got caught so quickly after they exposed themselves.

  14. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Russian President Vladimir Putin said Wednesday Joe Biden would be better for Russia as president than Donald Trump, ahead of a potential rematch between the two in this year’s U.S. election.
    .
    “[Biden] is a more experienced, predictable person. He is a politician of the old school. But we will work with any leader of the United States, who is trusted by the American people,” Putin said in an interview on broadcaster Rossiya 1 TV when asked to choose between the two.

    https://redstate.com/jeffc/2024/02/14/vladimir-putin-tells-the-world-which-us-presidential-candidate-he-would-prefer-to-have-in-the-white-house-n2170136

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      4-D Chess. He REALLY supports Trump. Everybody fears Biden.

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "He just said that to help Trump" - Chemjeff probably

  15. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Massie is asking why bomb sniffing dog that walked right near the J6 "viable" pipe bomb didn't detect anything.

    https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1757605317137850852

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      I get what Massie is doing. but K9's aren't exactly reliable.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        Drug sniffing dogs react to the handler, bomb sniffing dogs used by the military are much more accurate, because the handler has no idea what he's looking for

        1. ducksalad   1 year ago

          The military dogs are trained to detect stuff.
          The drug dogs are trained to generate probable cause.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Bomb sniffing dogs are pretty reliable.

        What doesn't seem reliable is the bomb was an actual bomb since it used a 1 hour kitchen timer and hadn't gone off 24 hours later.

        1. Dillinger   1 year ago

          they'd never let a real bomb w/i proximity of even Karmela

  16. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Japan's economy is in trouble.

    Have they tried the art of printing more yen?

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Money printer go bllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.

      1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

        Damn. You owe me a coffee and a monitor. 🙂

      2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        From what I understand, the yen is currently trading at around 140 to a dollar. Maybe ten years ago it was 100 yen to dollar. Considering the dollar has lost considerable value as well, then I think the answer is they have been printing a lot of yen.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          You mean it's just wear and tear and not finely tuned Japanese quality practices that makes it sound like it's running more smoothly than American money printers?

    2. Zeb   1 year ago

      Hasn't it been in trouble for like 30 years?

    3. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      Yeah, in the 90s. It didn't work.

    4. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Actually, one of their big problems is that they hold over a trillion dollars in US securities. They’re getting ducked over by us inflationary monetary policies. No other country holds as much as Japan does.

  17. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Democratic fucktards in Colorado still at it, part eleventy.

    Colorado Public Radio report:
    Guns would be banned everywhere in Colorado from arenas to zoos under new Democratic bill

    Colorado gun owners would be barred from carrying firearms in a wide array of public places in the state, under a Democratic bill recently introduced at the state Capitol.

    Senate Bill 131 would require people to leave their guns behind when they visit a long list of locations, including government buildings, hospitals, churches, and other places of worship, bars, public parks, rec centers, zoos, and political rallies and demonstrations. It would apply to both concealed and open carry.

    Another Colorado Public Radio report:
    Colorado Attorney General files lawsuit to stop Kroger-Albertsons merger

    AG Phil Weiser said in a press conference on Wednesday that a lawsuit to block the merger was filed after a yearlong investigation including 19 town hall meetings across the state. He said the merger between two of the state’s largest supermarket chains would eliminate head-to-head competition.

    UFCW Local 7, the union representative for King Soopers, City Market, Albertsons, and Safeway workers in Colorado, released a statement applauding Weiser’s efforts.

    Denver Post:
    Colorado legislators eye “one-time pot of money” to help schools enrolling migrant students

    Rep. Emily Sirota, a Denver Democrat, said she requested the Joint Budget Committee sponsor legislation that would set up a one-time cash fund of $24 million within the state Department of Education that the agency could use to distribute additional money to school districts based on an updated count of students.

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Senate Bill 131 would require people to leave their guns behind when they visit a long list of locations, including government buildings, hospitals, churches, and other places of worship, bars, public parks, rec centers, zoos, and political rallies and demonstrations. It would apply to both concealed and open carry.

      Lemme guess: All cops and government agents are exempt.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Also private body guards for approved people.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Rather tacit admission that blue-voting Democrats in Denver can't be trusted to carry firearms, after their counterparts in Kansas City proved that in real time.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Different rules for different (color) people.

    3. Super Scary   1 year ago

      No firearms in zoos? Don't come crying to us when the animals rebel and all you have are butterfly nets and buckets of fish.

    4. Overt   1 year ago

      They also put forward a bill to ban all oil extraction in the state by 2030, and to ban any oil extraction during the summer months (i.e. the time when it isn't freezing or snowing).

      They are clear that this isn't for safety- it is 100% to stop climate change.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Or stop capitalism.

        1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

          They are the same, yes?

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago (edited)

        Keep in mind, these are the same retards who claimed that ending the Gallagher Amendment was necessary to “help pay for schools,” despite warnings that doing so would send home property taxes into orbit, convinced Colorado’s idiot voters to end it, acted completely shocked when what they were warned about ended up happening, and then tried playing post facto reindeer games with TABOR rules to make up for the spiking taxes, only to see their band-aid approach get rejected this last election.

        They also passed a stupid bill that said something like 70% of all new cars sold in the state by 2032 needed to be electrics.

  18. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

    "prioritizes devoting state resources (and harsh enforcement) to maintaining the opulent stations at the expense of many other priorities."

    Like giving money to other countries not involved with us?
    Launching massively expensive attacks Um investigations into political opponents and their allies.
    Funding a foreign invasion to destroy their own culture?
    Forcing experimental drugs on citizens?

    Long story short the idea that Russia is governed by corrupt authoritarian and the US is free is no longer aplicable

  19. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...Carlson seems to take this as airtight proof that Russian President Vladimir Putin knows how to govern.

    You know who else made trains a point of pride?

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      The answer to this question is always Sir Topham Hatt.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

      Autistic kids?
      Ayn rand?
      The Japanese?
      Porn stars?
      Pat monohan?

    3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Mussolini?

    4. Super Scary   1 year ago

      The Tweetsie Railroad?

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Newsom?

      1. Ron   1 year ago

        Newsom can't even build a train let alone run one

    6. Anomalous   1 year ago

      Leland Stanford?

    7. Minadin   1 year ago

      AOC?

  20. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    "Does Tom Suozzi's Long Island congressional seat flip tell Democrats how they ought to message on immigration?"

    Nick Gillespie once hyped a poll in which a majority of Americans agreed with the bland statement "Immigration is a good thing" to prove your sugar daddy's gimme-cheap-labor agenda is broadly popular.

    Fiona pointed to 24 hours on Martha's Vineyard to prove progressives embrace the consequences of Biden's loose border policy.

    If Koch-funded libertarians can be trusted, Democrats should in fact campaign as the open borders party in November. It's just smart politics. 🙂

  21. mad.casual   1 year ago

    It is possible that Putin, following in the footsteps of Stalin, merely prioritizes devoting state resources (and harsh enforcement) to maintaining the opulent stations at the expense of many other priorities.

    Right, other priorities like putting Gender Queer in kindergarten libraries, threatening to bomb Americans and end NATO infrastructure, and collaborating with the Party to fabricate novel legal prosecutions of his political opponents.

    1. Ron   1 year ago (edited)

      I will say Putin doesn't create elaborate legal prosecutions against his opponents, he just has them pushed out of windows

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Uh, despite what would nominally be readily demonstrable as a poisoning and subsequently ascribed to Putin, Navalny has never demonstrated any conclusive proof or anything beyond circumstantial evidence that he was poisoned (by Putin).

        The exhaustive use of lawfare against him however, is well documented.

      2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        Or blows up airplanes.

  22. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    "Japan's economy is in trouble."

    Have they tried importing millions of "Brown bodies" who will work for poverty wages?

    #OpenBordersWillFixEverything

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Do Japanese hipsters like dining at food trucks?

    2. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      The new guy has been extolling the virtues of mass immigration since he took office. I don't know what effect the recent spate of western Twitch streamers publicly making asses of themselves for views will have on his plans, though.

    3. HorseConch   1 year ago

      They probably don't have room on that tiny island for all the prosperity millions of undocumented Japanese would provide them. Our cities are currently flooded with so much cash that people are moving out so they don't have to store it all.

    4. Zeb   1 year ago

      They might need to if they don't start breeding.

  23. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    '"We are determined to foment a rebellion. We will not be held account to laws in which we have no voice or representation," said one of the activists.'

    Good. So we can just shoot you in the head on the spot.

    1. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      Sounds like insurrection.

      1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        Sounds like Treason.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      Save a bullet, use a baseball bat.

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        I dunno, Sevo, my bats are pretty nice. I wouldn't want to damage any of them.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          I thought that's what tire irons were for anyway.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          I've got a couple of old aluminum bats from back in the days when I played in several county rec softball leagues that I'd be happy to donate to the cause.

  24. JFree   1 year ago

    Israel must continue weighing whether raids like these are worth the cost—a situation it's been forced into in part due to Hamas' callous disregard for human life.

    Been forced into. Ah yes I forgot. Israel is always the fucking victim isn't it.

    And what cost? The pro-genocide commenters and Reason are busy applauding like seals

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      And JFree goes full Mizek.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        I don't call him J(ew)Free for nothing.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          JFucked works too.

    2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      Yes, you must let the violently insane person to continue to hit you because they have strapped a toddler to their body.

    3. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      Been forced into

      Yes, in exactly the same way that the Nazis forced the Allies into weighing whether raids on German cities were worth the cost. Where is the fallacy?

    4. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      If I had to pick an ally and my choices were Hamas and the dwellers of Gaza OR Israel, I'm taking the Israelis. Every. Fucking. Time.

      I'm not even going to provide my reasons.

      1. Anomalous   1 year ago

        No need to. The reasons are many and obvious.

        1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

          Except to a democrat.

    5. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      "Been forced into. Ah yes I forgot. Israel is always the fucking victim isn’t it."

      ...I mean, especially here, easy yes lmao

    6. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

      jFree, you’re confused. YOU are the pro genocide commenter.

      For, the river to the sea, right?

    7. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      JFree, Israel will first kill off all the Hama-ssholes in Gaza. Then they will kill off the Hama-ssholes in Judea and Samaria. And then systematically hunt Hama-ssholes down, wherever they are in the world, and kill them.

      From the river to the sea, Israel shall be free (of Hama-ssholes). 🙂

    8. Minadin   1 year ago

      Didn't they find a bunch of terrorists, weapons, tunnels, etc. at the last hospital they entered?

      Oh, and all the UNRWA facilities.

  25. Commenter_XY   1 year ago (edited)

    Misek, JFree and misconstrueman will be along shortly to shill for their Hamas Homies….

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Missed it by one post.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      nardz seems to have figured out that trumpeting his antisemitism wasn't a good idea.

      1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

        Sevo, I borrowed one of your postings. I am 'Sevo-ing' misconstrueman as an antisemitic pile of shit.

  26. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'It's not clear who is helped by all this—having cars idle in traffic, due to human street blockages doesn't really seem to help stop climate change—but the incidents do seem to be growing in frequency.'

    Really? How about anybody how seeks to overthrow free societies by inducing panic and providing cover for power-hungry elites?

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      It would be stopped quick enough by beating them into a pulp when they tried these actions, but no one in these deep blue shitholes wants to risk the cops arresting them for attacking the regime's foot soldiers.

      Obviously, if they tried this in red-controlled areas, they probably wouldn't make it out alive.

      1. Moonrocks   1 year ago

        the regime's foot soldiers

        That's exactly what it is. They're emboldened because they're allowed to do as they please. We all saw how quickly and vigorously the anti-lockdown protests were put down by the same cops allowing these antics to happen, so it's not like they can't or aren't willing to crack down.

        if they tried this in red-controlled areas, they probably wouldn’t make it out alive

        They made it out alive of that Indian reservation. I doubt they're willing to tempt fate like that again.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago (edited)

          That’s exactly what it is. They’re emboldened because they’re allowed to do as they please. We all saw how quickly and vigorously the anti-lockdown protests were put down by the same cops allowing these antics to happen, so it’s not like they can’t or aren’t willing to crack down.

          Elegant proof that a nation that indulges such oikophobia really doesn’t deserve to continue to exist in its current state. It’s just a question of when things break apart, not if they do so. And the neocons the whole time will be uselessly wringing their hands about it, as they always do, because none of them really have the stomach to actually resist the left’s persistent efforts to move the Overton Window. They'll just complain that the right is resisting it at all.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            So where do you want to be when the shit hits the fan? Both to avoid immediate carnage and to fit into what regime takes over your region.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              Realistically, the mountains are the best option, which has been a go-to strategy for humans for thousands of years, as the geography limits mobility of any armed forces. Yeah, that shit sucks in winter, but you have access to cleaner water sources due to snow runoff, game-hunting and trapping opportunities, and plenty of firewood. Look at the pueblo ruins throughout the Four Corners region, and what stands out is how many ruins are tucked in relatively inaccessible places in canyon walls, or on bluffs that provide a panorama of the surrounding area. Chaco's an exception, and even there, there are settlements on the top of the bluff that must have been an absolute pain in the ass to walk up and down the staircase nooks in the rocks every day.

              There's a reason places like Afghanistan are, realistically, completely ungovernable in toto, and the regime-holders at any given time really don't control much outside the main cities. I think PJ O'Rourke even made a remark about this in "Holidays in Hell" when he went to visit Albania.

              1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                Wolverines!

  27. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Illinois wants to charge you with child abuse if you dont transition your kids.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/measure-would-make-parents-abusers-denying-children-sex-changes

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      "You didn't make that (kid)!"

    2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

      Better a million democrats are slaughtered in defense than one innocent child is genitally mutilated by them.

  28. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    It's not clear who is helped by all this

    George Wallace LARPers, that's who.

  29. JesseAz   1 year ago

    For the Trump tax cuts caused the deficits wing if true libertarianism.

    Tax revenue is up 33% since tax cuts. Spending is up 50%

    https://justthenews.com/government/congress/tax-revenue-increased-33-trump-era-tax-reform-while-spending-increased-more-50

  30. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'This is, uh, not the right takeaway from the Fani Willis scandal, by The New York Times'

    How dare you! The only way to view society, as proven by decades of grievance study research, is the power hierarchy. Anyone with more power that criticizes somebody weaker does that only by and for racism, sexism, genderism, ablism, and nasty MAGA capitalism.

  31. NoVaNick   1 year ago

    I hope these climate protester kiddos block more roads every day before the election.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      They remind me of the Westboro Baptist folks, who in hindsight were an obvious astroturfing campaign. I wonder if these guys are too?

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        I'm not convinced of that. I've experienced those WBC assholes firsthand.

        Though, they did have a well-documented and developed strategy of doing outrageous things in an attempt to get people and officials to over-react, so they could sue. The entire 'church' was one family (pretty much) and most of them were lawyers.

        It's not too dissimilar to some of the tactics that you see on the very far left sometimes.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          The guy was originally a huge lefty and civil rights lawyer and his son was an actual Al Gore designated elector.

          As soon as the gay marriage debate heats up they started their own brand-new, unaffiliated church composed entirely of formerly ultra-liberal family members, whose only church activity was to protest homosexuality in the most obnoxious way possible.

          They didn't protest pride parades or gay bathhouses. No, they protested at the funerals of decidedly heterosexual soldiers and police officers in the most obnoxious way possible claiming their deaths were because God hates America for having gays.

          They were so horrible nobody wanted to appear associated with them and guilt by association muted even the most conservative churches opposition.

          Then as soon as the Supremes allow gay marriage they pack up shop and disappear.

          Pretty suss, bro.

      2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        They weren't, they were mostly one extended family that was close to a cult. The reason they're not really around anymore is that the patriarch has since died and they splintered. They were what they appeared to be on the surface, assholes and whackos.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago (edited)

          They quit the moment gay marriage was legalized and Fred Phelps died a couple of years after that. Most of the family members have since been “excommunicated” and now do LGBTQ advocacy like Nathan Phelps and Megan Phelps-Roper.

          I don’t really care because I think the state has no business regulating marriage, but the whole thing glows.

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            Phelps was legitimately a fire-and-brimstone guy going back to the 1950s. There's interviews you can find with him from that period. He wasn't just interjecting into the gay marriage debate when it was coming up, he was preaching about licentiousness and blatant sin long before the 1990s, when WBC became notorious for their constant protests.

            I'm not trying to deny that there may be psy-ops out there, we've seen plenty of them lately, but this was not. His son, Nate, rebelled against his father back in the 1970s, and he was never a church member nor a protestor, so his advocacy isn't unreasonable because he really hated his father.

            Sometimes things actually are what they present themselves as.

  32. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Tucker Carlson is now releasing the strangest short videos, set to classical music, praising Moscow's subway system, which was built by Joseph Stalin in order to…impress foreigners. But even if you concede that the Moscow subway system is beautiful, Carlson seems to take this as airtight proof that Russian President Vladimir Putin knows how to govern. I do not take the same lesson from this. It is possible that Putin, following in the footsteps of Stalin, merely prioritizes devoting state resources (and harsh enforcement) to maintaining the opulent stations at the expense of many other priorities.

    Said it yesterday, but so glad thus is the focus of the interview and not any of the substance of it.

    1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Tucker doesn’t have to do or say any of this, though. He could have just let the interview stand on its own.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        He seems to appreciate architecture. That's my take.

        When I travel thats usually the focus of my travels as well. Especially in Europe.

        Don't think these videos are to buttress the interview. Russia has some amazing architecture. Dont have to dismiss it just because of politics.

        1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

          If he appreciates architecture, then the architecture Moscow contains has more to with the old Czarist and Stalinist regimes than the current government under Putin.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Yeah, but with current local governments seeking to destroy the past, at least good to see a current regime not go the route of tearing down history.

          2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            The Moscow subway is a literal work of art that tourists from all over the world come to see.
            Like I said elsewhere here, visiting the Moscow subway is like visiting Notre-Dame, Buckingham Place, the Sagrada Familia or the Brandenburg Gate. It's an architectural marvel that people specifically go to see.

            The fact that journalists are equivocating it to the Boston Metro shows their ignorance. It's conception pre-date the Soviets BTW. A grand design of Tsarist Russia.

        2. Minadin   1 year ago

          That old adage is:

          Europeans think 100 miles is a long distance and Americans think 100 years is a long time.

      2. Moonrocks   1 year ago

        Was about to say this. Tucker himself could have promoted his arguably groundbreaking Putin interview by tweeting about the substance of the interview, but instead decided to lose the plot by suggesting we should run the US more like Russia despite the fact that we we're already run by an oligarchy that uses its power to silence dissent.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

          Yeah, but at least in Russia, the trains run on time. We've got all the oligarchy, but with graffiti, used needles, crime and murder.

          1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

            You know that the original claim that Mussolini made the trains run on time was a myth and this new claim about Putin's regime is likely a myth as well?

        2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

          That may be true, but the state of our cities is a very relevant topic right now. It would be hard not to notice the absence of screaming hobos and feces if one was used to NY & SF.

          Point taken, however, that it was a musing probably better left unsaid, all things considered.

  33. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Rachel Dolezal, who made headlines years ago for identifying as black despite being born to white parents, recently lost her teaching job over her OnlyFans account.

    Good ole tucson.

    1. MasterThief   1 year ago

      Wouldn't recommend checking out the photos. She definitely leans into being a gross slut, but honestly the fake blackness is even more unsettling. In a sane world, this woman would have been institutionalized long ago

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        But isn't hedonism the same as libertarianism?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Only to the libertines like ENB.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          ENB doesn’t do the roundup anymore.

        3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          You win the Gillespie prize.

          1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            ENB is officially on sandwich duty now.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        What gets me is that the school she taught at is one of the more respected high schools in Tucson near the "rich people."

      3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Fake men and women, too. In a sane world, those folks would have been institutionalized instead of lionized.

  34. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    "We are determined to foment a rebellion.

    they are doing that...

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      They should get it. Fast and hard.

  35. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    What's missing in the discussion over Putin/Carlson.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/what-everyone-missing-about-putincarlson-talk

    Everyone, even the Davos/UK dominated media, has put forth their opinion on it. I gave out a quick take for my Patrons the morning after just like everyone else. And like everyone else I missed the biggest takeaway from this interview.

    On the one hand we have people intentionally missing the point because they need to have their opinions validated. And on the other we have people intentionally leading those truly curious away from the purpose of the interview: to get an unfiltered look at Putin’s motivations for how he governs Russia.

    Why? Because, as we already also know, the warmongers are in charge in the West and they will not be deterred by some prep school gadfly and a dirty Slavic ruler with pretensions of adequacy.

    But buried beneath these layers of surreality are these men’s motivations for having this talk. Carlson’s motivation is illuminated quite effectively in his first appearance after his talk with Putin (watch the first 90 seconds).

    His outrage at being denied this interview for three years by NSA/CIA spying on him is what drove him. The worst thing the gatekeepers ever did was fire Tucker Carlson from Fox News; making him independent freed him from the restraints of the corporate media.

    No, Putin’s aim was to elucidate, calmly, the nature of the conflict, laying out the missteps made along the way. And I believe he was effective to those that stayed with him. Because, never once did Putin talk down to his audience.

    How many Americans learned that Putin asked Bill Clinton for Russia to become part of NATO, thus ending NATO’s raison d’etre?

    Or that Bush the Lesser unilaterally abrogated the ABM Treaty?

    Or that the Minsk Agreements were our last hope for a settlement of the differences between the Donbass and Kiev, and that Putin was the one pushing to make them work?

    And this is what everyone missed about this interview. It literally does not matter one whit whose is right and who is wrong here. Putin’s version of history isn’t what’s at stake here.

    What Putin said, quite clearly, is that this ball is in our court. We can either sit down and have an honest discussion of a negotiated future or we will be at war. If that is what we in the West want, it is what we will get. Putin has put his sons on the line in eastern Ukraine. Are we?

    The Victoria Nulands and the Ursula Von Der Leyens of this world represent people who refuse to accept that Russia and/or China are not systems, but rather civilizations. They aren’t the current bogeyman ‘ism du jour, like Communism or authoritarianism, they are a people, a culture, an ethnos. The ‘ism is just the thing they’ve adopted now to help them preserve those things inherently Russian or Chinese.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      Oh for Pete's sake!

      What Putin said, quite clearly, is that this ball is in our court.

      Putin invaded Crimea and Ukraine in clear repudiation of Russia's 1994 promise to honor Ukraine's borders in exchange for Ukraine surrendering its nuclear weapons.
      Putin could end the war there even sooner than waiting for diplomats to gather round a table.
      To accept his blaming everyone else shows a gullible naive reporter.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        There, IMHO, seems to be a lot of wrong to go around. The West extends NATO eastward; Russia invades Crimea; the West coordinates a coup in Ukraine; Russia invades Ukraine. Both sides arm people in Ukraine.

        As far as I'm concerned, it's long past time to sit at a table and hammer something out here.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          Yes, exactly, a whole bunch of governments doing what governments do best (which is not to say well): fuck things up. Thus my complaint that anyone would put any credence in Putin claiming it's in "our" court.

        2. Scarlet   1 year ago

          Who are we to sit at a table to hammer anything out?

          The Ukraine has repeatedly indicated a willingness to sit at a table with Russia as soon as troops move back to the correct side of the border.

          Putin could be sitting at this table to 'hammer something out' within two days by simply stopping trying to steal the property of others and going back to his side of the border. Is not the safeguard and respect for personal property a core tenet of libertarianism?

          The ball is very much in his court.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Ukraine and Russia were near an agreement to stop the war a year ago before Boris Johnson and Biden got involved.

            1. Scarlet   1 year ago

              The war could stop in two days if Russia went back to their side of the border.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                What other borders do you think need protecting?

                Why did foreign nations kill the agreement? Why is the US involved in any manner? Did the borders matter when the US got involved in prior Ukrainian elections?

          2. R Mac   1 year ago

            If you think the only way to peace is Putin surrendering in a war he’s winning, I question if you care about peace.

        3. Scarlet   1 year ago

          Nice attempt to muddy the waters with the "a lot of wrong to go around" comment.

          No, none of these things are equivalent.

          Countries volunteering to join an alliance like NATO is not the same as sending troops across a border to steal territory.

          If by coup you are referring to the Maidan revolution, which involved a vote by Ukrainian parliament and a free election... wow, it is truly baffling how this is relevant, or in any way justifies Russia's invasion.

          "Both sides arm people in Ukraine"... lol one side has sent hundreds of thousands of troops across the border to steal territory.

          If you cannot see the difference between consensual agreements between sovereign nations, and rolling tanks across a border, I don't know what to say.

          It is in the best interest of America to continue to fund the Ukraine and thereby degrade the military and economic influence of one of Americas biggest enemies. The Ukrainians are doing a huge service to the world by not rolling over, like some cowards would have them do, and we should all be grateful.

          This could all end in 2 days if Putin withdraws troops back to their side of the border. The ball is in his court.

          1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

            Go to Ukraine if you want to help them so much. Keep the rest of us out of the war.

        4. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

          You forgot the part where Russia attempted the assassination of Ukraine presidential candidate Yushenko in 2004. Also the numerous other times they committed acts of war by ordering assassinations in NATO countries. Not exactly the way to make friends and influence people.

          But I do agree Ukraine should settle and then build their defenses because Russia will be back given the oppurtunity one way or another. The USA and West should continue though to block all trade with the Rus and allow Russia to disengrate.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            The USA and West should continue though to block all trade with the Rus and allow Russia to disengrate.

            Except Russia is not, at all, disintegrating by any appreciable measure. There's plenty of trade going on within the BRICS contingent, and North Korea pumps out munitions for them at a level that would make US military contractors weep. Shit, they even have their own knockoff McDonalds now.

            Everything the Nulandites were planning all hinged on the 2023 offensive. Pentagon officials at a conference I attended in March openly stated this. And the offensive went kaput specifically because that chair moistener Lipstick Milley jawboned the Ukrainian military to try a Desert Storm-style offensive through a bottlenecked minefield, with a gorgeous field of fire for artillery, against hardened, entrenched positions. On top of that, the Ukrainians are not known for maintaining their equipment, preferring to run everything into the ground, and modern western weapons systems are unprecedented in requiring a massive logistics apparatus to support continued operations. That's why they keep begging us for planes, tanks, etc.--because they can't, or won't, do the work required to take them off the line and repair them.

            1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

              I agree with you on the above vis a vie Ukrainian War. I am suggesting a much deeper and longer (decades) disintegration.

              The Soviet system left Russia rotting and I don't care how much western aid and access to capital has helped stem that; the cancer has spread too far and wide.

              The Rus population is in a terrible shape. Huge bithrate declines along with sucide, alcoholism, and AIDs being rampant.

              Their military has performed terribly. Complete lack of strategic cohesion, poor leadership...

              They are heavily reliant on the Western energy sector's expertise to extract their crude and maintain their infrastructure. And that isn't easily replaced - middle east allies don't know cold weather and China is no better. Losing access to BP or Exxon, huge.

              Poorly educated, big byproduct of the Soviets. See a lot of above for the consequences of Soviet education.

              And BRICS is no replacement for Western markets, otherwise they would have been just trading with them all along. I've seen little to nothing from BRICS except for bold policy initiatives that never materialize; big reason being China and Russia will never agree to be subservient to the other and neither trusts the other. And considering the rampant corruption in all members states homelands, why would they trust each other.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                “Their military has performed terribly. Complete lack of strategic cohesion, poor leadership…”

                The US has given Ukraine more money than Russia’s military budget, and Russia has successfully achieved most of their objectives. Not sure how poorly that is.

                1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

                  Most of the objectives? 5 out of 24 oblasts, is not exactly winning. Unless you don't believe Putin is sincere in his history lesson that all of Ukraine is Russia. And before Western arms flooded the country, the Ukrainians were still able to stop the Russian advance towards Kiev. And why was that advance so poorly executed if not for the fact that the Russian military made blunder after blunder. Oh it isn't really a great sign for your military cohesion when a commander commits mutiny.

                2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

                  Mac think of destruction the woke have done in this country. Now that same mindset was completely in control of Russia, magnitudes more intense then what he experience. And was in control for 70 years. What do think the state of the country is in?

                3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                  Sure we've given them a lot. How much has actually been used on the war effort? How much has been siphoned off?

    2. Scarlet   1 year ago

      This level of self-fellatio in writing has got to be satire.

      Cut through all the circular bullshit around this topic and you are left with one question: did one country cross the sovereign borders of another in order to claim territory or not?

      you ask: "Putin has put his sons on the line in eastern Ukraine. Are we?"

      The answer of course, is "no, lol". Instead it seems the west is quite intelligently spending a mere fraction (<1.5% for the US) of its defense budget to dramatically diminish the capabilities of one of its largest enemies with no boots on the ground. This is, by all accounts, the deal of the century.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        It is ...

        This is, by all accounts, the deal of the century.

        ... for statists. It is no such thing for taxpayers.

        It's my goddam money they're stealing for their own purposes. Note especially that we are arming Ukraine only enough to keep Russia from winning, because if we armed them enough to make Russia fear losing, it could well trigger WW III.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        The answer of course, is “no, lol”. Instead it seems the west is quite intelligently spending a mere fraction (<1.5% for the US) of its defense budget to dramatically diminish the capabilities of one of its largest enemies with no boots on the ground. This is, by all accounts, the deal of the century.

        By what appreciable measure has Russia's military capability been diminished? They stopped the spring offensive dead in its tracks, and are quite content at this point to nibble around the margins while forcing Ukraine to keep shoveling their own manpower into the furnace and running their military supplies into the ground. Ukraine cannot win a war of attrition against Russia; and any equipment we lend them ends up having to be junked because they can't maintain it enough to keep it in the field.

        And why am I hearing echoes of Vietnam with kill counts of Russian bodies and numbers of materiel destroyed? Because that's been shown to not be an appreciable measure of how well you're actually doing against the enemy.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Russia got rid of a lot of their near obsolete military. They largely used junk.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            If I remember correctly, Soldiermedic was able to identify specifically some of the equipment from the original feint from Belarus as outdated equipment.

  36. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Tucker Carlson is now releasing the strangest short videos,

    Pro-Soviet conservatives are marching to the beat of the MAGA 1812 Overture.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      But if it is Prokofiev I will have to defend the Tuckster.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
        turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

          Have you always been a big Putin fan, Sevo?

          1. Sevo   1 year ago

            turd certainly is dishonest, but he’s got a heaping helping of stupid to go with his dishonesty. Stupid, lying, despicable steaming pile of lefty shit and proud to be!

          2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            No idea, but you seem to be a big fan of CP. Now, care to explain why there's a "2" after your name?

          3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Neocons going to neocon.

          4. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            Personally I would put put Putin down as quickly as I would end you. Save for the big question mark of who ends up running Russia when he dies. Some of the possible successors are worse.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      "The 1980s called. They want their foreign policy back."

      - Nobel Peace Prize winner Barack Obama

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Sec. Clinton handed a literal Reset button (except that was screwed up too) to Putin's foreign minister, meant to reflect the Obama administration's desire to improve relations between the United States and Russia.

        VP Biden:

        ll of us, we all invested in a type of Russia we hoped -— and still hope -— will emerge one day: a Russia integrated into the world economy; more prosperous, more invested in the international order.

        It was in that same spirit that we supported the establishment of the NATO-Russia Council and Russian membership in countless other institutions, from the Council of Europe to the WTO. Unfortunately, and I mean it when I say unfortunately, as the Chancellor pointed out this morning, President Putin has chosen a different path.

        Pres. Obama:

        Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it's important for him to give me space."

        Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…"

        Obama: "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."

        Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

    4. Super Scary   1 year ago

      But I thought you people loved public transportation!

  37. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    I do not take the same lesson from this. It is possible that Putin, following in the footsteps of Stalin, merely prioritizes devoting state resources (and harsh enforcement) to maintaining the opulent stations at the expense of many other priorities.

    This rather reminds me of Reason's decades long bitching about how DC doesn't properly allocate state resources to its train system.

  38. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Trump's first criminal trial set to begin March 25 as judge denies bid to dismiss "hush money" case
    By Graham Kates, Katrina Kaufman

    Updated on: February 15, 2024 / 10:57 AM EST / CBS News

    Now I tend to agree with Sandy that the Dotard is above the law and he will skate on all his crimes.

    But I like the attempt.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      How long will Trump live in your head?

      1. DesigNate   1 year ago

        Till the day the little demshill dies, choking on his own blood or vomit.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
      But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

    3. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      "the Dotard is above the law and he will skate on all his crimes"

      We've been through this.

      I said you #Resistance dorks have been repeating bombshell tipping point walls closing in beginning of the end for so long that your analysis of Trump's legal troubles cannot be taken seriously.

      I'll believe Trump is going to prison when I see video of him being led there. Not when some MSNBC legal analyst tells me "This time he's goin' down for REAL!!!!"

      #TheDorksWhoCriedWolf

      1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        Yes, Hur's report is letting Biden skate on his crimes.

      2. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        Why was not rthe hush money case dismissed?

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

      Shrike, do you think this was a campaign violation? Difficulty. It was a personal matter and didn’t use campaign funds.

      Amazing watching the banana Republic party defenders support state abuse every day.

      Also... why no link lol? Too embarassed?

  39. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Liberals Are Not Laughing About Jon Stewart’s Jabs at Joe Biden
    Democrats who only remember the 'Daily Show' host as a fierce critic of conservatives had a rude awakening on his return to the program

    https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/jon-stewart-liberal-lashing-daily-show-biden-1234967551/

    What a bunch of pussies DEMOCRATS (not liberals) are.

    Sleepy Joe is too OLD, you idiots. Stewart is the most astute political observer in media.

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      As I said, rip the bandaid off on the first episode, then just do TRUMP until the election.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago (edited)

        Well, Donnie is easy comedian fodder you must admit.

        He is a fucking blowhard. Donnie is Cartman all grown up.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Speak for yourself, Turd.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Trump is a blowhard, and I think even his biggest supporters would freely admit that.
            However, a blowhard fifty-center like Shrike calling him that is some serious chutzpah.

        2. Sevo   1 year ago

          The TDS-addled turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        3. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

          He's a Jewish Rabbi who sacrifices his own happiness as a husband and father for the greater good of society to fix the past?

    3. Sevo   1 year ago

      Here's an example of how badly turd lies and his stupidity in hoping someone else will believe his steaming pile of bullshit:

      "Sleepy Joe is too OLD, you idiots."

      No, asshole, he's DEMENTED. There are plenty of people well over 90 capable of remembering their names, while shits like him (and you) are demented far younger.
      Fuck off and die, you pathetic pile of shit.

  40. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    Data underscore weak domestic consumption, investment

    Muslim immigration can solve this.

  41. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    Trump/Biden articles in my local daily:

    Trump:

    Trump’s New York hush-money case will start March 25. It’s the first of his criminal trials

    Special counsel asks Supreme Court to let Trump’s 2020 election case proceed to trial without delay

    Donald Trump stands by remarks about not defending NATO members after backlash

    Biden:

    Biden shields Palestinians in the U.S. from deportation

    Norwegian Arctic Circle town expected green energy boom, then came Bidenomics VIEW

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      On the second article in the Biden handjob:

      Its incentives for battery production within the United States were so generous that they eventually helped prod Freyr to pause its Norway facility and focus on setting up shop in Georgia.

      The startup is still raising funds to build the factory as it tries to prove the viability of its key technology, but it has already changed its business registration to the United States.

      Its pivot was symbolic of a larger global tug of war as countries vie for the firms and technologies that will shape the future of energy. The world has shifted away from decades of emphasizing private competition and has plunged into a new era of competitive industrial policy — one in which nations are offering a mosaic of favorable regulations and public subsidies to try to attract green industries like electric vehicles and storage, solar and hydrogen.

      Now, Reason, give us ten more articles on how it's just the GOP that has abandoned "free market ideology".

  42. mtrueman   1 year ago

    "Meanwhile, on the Israel-Lebanon border, things are heating up. Israel reportedly killed 10 Lebanese civilians in strikes overnight"

    Should read "Israel reportedly forced to kill 10 Lebanese civilians..."

    Maybe even "Israel reportedly forced to kill 10 Iranian backed Lebanese civilians..." just to remove any possible doubts.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      Should read "I hate Jews, Misek is my leader, and Jfree is my comrade."

      1. mtrueman   1 year ago

        I don't hate Jews. The only reason I'm labelled antisemitic is that I oppose the policies of Israel - occupation, apartheid, genocide etc. These days Nazis and the right in general tend to support the state of Israel, and it's plausible that the original Nazis would have supported Israel had it existed. They were certainly antisemitic, but very enthusiastic about encouraging German Jews to follow the Zionist project and setting themselves up in Palestine, even offering money to do so. That's how the SS occupied themselves until 1939.

        Today is not so much different. We have pro zionist organizations like the ADL - 'the world's premier watchdog on antisemitism' going to the trouble of defending Ukraine's neo nazi Azov Brigades. Why? Because while the Azov Brigades hate Jews, they support Israel, just like many of the commenters here.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          "I don’t hate Jews..."

          Followed by lies justifying why the asshole hates Jews:
          "... The only reason I’m labelled antisemitic is that I oppose the policies of Israel – occupation, apartheid, genocide etc..."

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            “I don’t hate Jews… but why won't they just let psychotic terrorists just kill them all and drive them out of the Levant?”

            From the River to the Sea, right mtrueman?

            1. mtrueman   1 year ago

              Which river? Which sea? Which them? Which they? You need to think beyond mere sloganeering.

              1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                From the river to the sea is the slogan of your friends, herr goering. Talk to them, and stop pretending you don't know what they refer to.

                1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                  "stop pretending you don’t know what they refer to"

                  If you don't know your rivers from your seas, maybe look at a map.
                  I don't see anyone in the region letting themselves be killed by psychotic terrorists. Whom do you have in mind?

                  1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    "Which river? Which sea?"

                    You're the one who asked this, dipshit.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      Thanks for the update.

                  2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    "If you don’t know your rivers from your seas, maybe look at a map."

                    "Hurr durr, I'll be retarded on purpose and maybe they'll let me get away with it"

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      You'll have to let me know which rivers and seas aren't retarded or antisemiotic. I'll try to stick to them in the future.

              2. R Mac   1 year ago

                Look at miscontrueman being a disingenuous shit.

                1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                  It's the notion that Israelis are going to allow themselves to be exterminated by Palestinians that's disingenuous. Or maybe Mother's Lament truly believes that Israelis will allow that to happen. In that case it's not so much disingenuous as it is insulting to Jews.

                  It's quite common for commenters here to raise the specter of Palestinians emerging from their tunnels and killing every Jew in Israel. It's a bullshit ploy to shift the topic from the actual genocide being perpetrated now by Israel against Palestinians. I'm not falling for it, and neither should you.

                  1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago (edited)

                    “Or maybe Mother’s Lament truly believes that Israelis will allow that to happen.”

                    No. I believe that you want that to happen.

                    " the actual genocide being perpetrated now by Israel against Palestinians."

                    And yet you have not one shred of fucking evidence for your Jew-hating slander.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "No. I believe that you want that to happen."

                      Thanks for sharing. I'm sure our Jew lovers here appreciate your efforts.

                      "And yet you have not one shred of fucking evidence for your Jew-hating slander."

                      I don't need evidence. The judges who heard South Africa's charges of genocide heard enough evidence to convince them. That's enough for me. What have you got against Israel's genocide against the Palestinians? Not Nazi enough for your taste? Don't they deserve it? Do the crimes of Oct. 7 mean nothing to you?

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      "I don’t need evidence."

                      We know.

                  2. R Mac   1 year ago

                    “It’s the notion that Israelis are going to allow themselves to be exterminated by Palestinians that’s disingenuous.”

                    Saying that anyone here is proposing this notion is disingenuous.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "Saying that anyone here is proposing this notion is disingenuous."

                      I'm not saying anyone here is proposing this notion. I'm saying that raising the possibility is a ploy to distract from the very real genocide that is happening now. And it's insulting to Jews, the very people you supposedly care so much about.

        2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

          misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

          misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            "misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit."

            I only I joined the neo Nazi Azov brigade. Then you'd be praising me. This shows how your supposed love of Jews is paper thin and hypocritical. I don't believe you care one way or the other about my feelings about Jews. You're offended by my support of Palestinians.

            1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

              misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

              misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

              misconstrueman would do the world a favor by flying his anti-semitic ass to gaza and doing a swan dive off any remaining building, headfirst.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                I support this extension from shrike.

            2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

              "You’re offended by my support of Palestinians."

              i.e. terrorists

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                Call them terrorists if you must. The shoe fits. Those who kill civilians for political purposes. But by those standards, it's wall to wall terrorists throughout the region, and beyond. Except maybe the Houthis of Yemen. They've been part of the fighting since Oct. last year, and they haven't killed a single civilian as far as I know. But by all means call the Houthis terrorists too if it makes you feel better. Your feelings are more important than any facts.

                1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

                  misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

                  misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

                  misconstrueman would do the world a favor by flying his anti-semitic ass to gaza and doing a swan dive off any remaining building, headfirst. But eating a bullet is fine, too.

                  1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    Me too:

                    misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

                    misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

                    misconstrueman would do the world a favor by flying his anti-semitic ass to gaza and doing a swan dive off any remaining building, headfirst. But eating a bullet is fine, too.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      You are capable of responding thoughtfully. This is not a good look for you.

                    2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

                      misconstrueman, you look a fucking lot worse than Mother's Lament ever will, POS.

                    3. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "you look a fucking lot worse than Mother’s Lament ever will, POS."

                      Say what you want about Nazis and their fondness for genocide, at least they looked good. I concern myself more about truth and righteousness than looking good.

                    4. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Asking what river and what sea was you being concerned with truth?

                      You realize it’s clear you’re full of shit, right?

                    5. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "Asking what river and what sea was you being concerned with truth?"

                      Just seeing if s/he can answer a simple question. Apparently not.

                      "You realize it’s clear you’re full of shit, right?"

                      I've read that. And worse to.

                    6. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Bullshit. You asked cuz you’re a disingenuous fucking troll.

                  2. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    "You asked cuz you’re a disingenuous fucking troll."

                    Hasn't stopped you from responding though. You should look into that. You really don't need to respond to everything that offends you. Especially if you've nothing of substance to add. Bluster and insults just make you look bad and waste my time when there are so many other topics to troll. (You might want to look at my comments under the car surveillance article. They are not quite so antisemiotic, but will probably offend you nevertheless. Good luck.)

                    1. R Mac   1 year ago

                      I’m not offended. I enjoy calling out full of shit trolls. The apt insults are just a bonus, you disingenuous cunt.

                    2. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "I’m not offended..."

                      Because deep down you're a Jew hater who hides behind a faux concern for the state of Israel.

        3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

          You’re labeled anti semiotic because you’re against Israel defending itself and want to provide cover for Muslims that want to kill them. So not against them other than that, right?

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            I've never been labelled anti semiotic. You're the first. A sign of things to come?

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              "OMG, a typing error! I win!!"

              You know what he meant, Herr t卐ueman.

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                I don't care what he meant. It's drivel any way you cut it. Semiotics, the 'science' of signs, is something I have opposed. If you had any decency, you'd join me.

                1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

                  You don’t care. Any more than you care if millions of Jews are slaughtered by hordes of murdering Muslims. You’re an evil Marxist piece of shit.

              2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

                It’s all he’s got.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      FOAD, misconstrueman.

    3. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      LOL, all the jew haters out in force with the same message.

    4. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

      misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

  43. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    AHAHAHAHAHAA! HAHAHAHAAAAA!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAA!
    *deep breath*

    HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

    Why Russia's Putin backing Biden for the US presidency is not what it seems

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      I think the article says more about the writer than anything about Trump, Biden, or Putin.

    2. mtrueman   1 year ago (edited)

      A haha is a shallow ditch that surrounds stately homes to prevent grazing cattle, sheep etc. from getting too close to the house and wreaking havoc in the flower beds.

      1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

        misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

        misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago (edited)

      2018: Evil Fascist Dictator Calls On Governors To Let People Attend Church, Go Outside.

      2021: Taliban Liberates Kabul From Regime That Tears Down Statues, Forces Women To Cover Their Faces, And Mutilates Childrens' Genitals.

      2024: Evil dictator prioritizes the architecture of public spaces over propagandizing kindergarten children, threatening to bomb Americans and end NATO infrastructure, and collaborating with the Party to fabricate novel legal prosecutions of his political opponents.

      Obliviously Retarded Magazine: “It’s hard to imagine two equally unpopular candidates, really.”

      At this point, I’m only about 50% sure that, were Putin able to run, he wouldn’t be both less popular than Biden and lose to him. And I’m like 95% sure that for all the dictatorial malfeasance that they could just point to, whether out of bungling stupidity, collusive support, backhanded tautological reasoning, or plain old hammer-and-nail habit, would begin trying to frame him and/or invent novel legal constructs to derail his campaign.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        2018 2020, duh.

  44. MollyGodiva   1 year ago

    Trump’s associates had direct contact with Russian agents in support of the Russian effort to muck with our election. It would have been dereliction of duty for the IC to ignore such a threat.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      And not sheer dereliction of duty to ignore Epstein's rape island, or Hillary's email server bleaching, or pushing the Russian conspiracy misinformation, or the Hunter laptop misinformation?

      Fuck off, partisan hack.

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Parody or retarded?

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        The latter, I believe.

        https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1757598802205131013

      2. Sevo   1 year ago

        Advanced cases of TDS mimic retardation in many, many ways.

    3. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      Trump Tower meeting with Kremlin officials in 2016 - FACT.

      BUT THAR WARN'T NO COLLUSION! - Trump-tards in unison.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago (edited)

        Tell us about the Steele Dossier again? You and Sam Harris can explain how while it was the truth, it contained truthiness.

        It was... truth adjacent.

      2. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

      3. JesseAz   1 year ago

        No question here on parody or retarded. 100% the latter.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          Imagine a POTUS candidate meeting with foreign gov't officials! Can't possibly be for familiarization; MUST be 'collusion'!
          /s/ the asshole lying pile of shit turd.

      4. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        "A meeting took place at Trump Tower in New York City on June 9, 2016, between three senior members of the 2016 Trump campaign – Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort – four other U.S. citizens, and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya."

        "Trump Tower meeting with KrEmLiN oFfiCiaLs"

        Natalia Veselnitskaya was never a Kremlin Official you DNC shill.

    4. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      So you don't believe the Mueller report?

      1. Super Scary   1 year ago

        It didn't come the conclusion they wanted, so they ignore it.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        He's probably never heard about it other than something, something orangemanbad on CNN, and has never heard of the Durham report that also completely refuted his Trump/Russia lie, because ActBlue didn't mention it in his morning emails.

    5. MollyGodiva   1 year ago

      To the detractors: It does not matter what the outcome of the investigation was, what matters is if there was valid reason to start the investigation. In this circumstance where their is indication that the Russian government is in contact with a US Presidential campaign for nefarious purposes, the answer is: yes.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        What was the valid reason? The reason you gave happened months after the start of the investigation.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        It does not matter what the outcome of the investigation was, what matters is if there was valid reason to start the investigation.

        Uh, the outcome of the investigation absolutely matters, you mis-directing sack of shit. Especially when that investigation was started up on cooked-up charges by the outgoing regime, in the service of a corrupt long-time politico whose hatchet man provided fake intel, and has been known for said politico's critics and associates ending up dead when the truth was a little too close to coming out in the open.

      3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        But, Molly, the whole reason for the investigation was the allegations made up from whole cloth by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. Hence, the reason was never valid in the first place.

        1. MollyGodiva   1 year ago

          For allegations that were made up, they ended up being mostly true. Russia was mucking with our election and was in contact with the Trump campaign.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago (edited)

            Sweeping generalizations do not make for “mostly true” allegations, no matter what Hillary claimed at the time.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Hillary lied, freedom died.

        2. Minadin   1 year ago

          The funny thing is, there is a lot more evidence that the Clinton campaign was colluding with Russia (and the outgoing administration and IC as well) than there ever was that the Trump campaign was.

      4. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        So there was valid reason to call President Zelenskky and ask to reexamine the circumstances of Shokin's firing?

      5. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        "It does not matter what the outcome of the investigation was, what matters is if there was valid reason to start the investigation."

        Great, let's investigate Molly for bank robbery and child rape and all we need is to create a reason.

        It's not for nothing that I call these guys Nazis.

      6. DesigNate   1 year ago

        Shrike is still never going to fuck you.

        Besides, even a retarded sock monkey like you could do better.

      7. D-Pizzle   1 year ago

        Now do Hunter and Joe Biden.

  45. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

    Tony Blinken (and Neil Diamond) admit that Ukraine did not exist in 1904.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2024-02-15/putin-trolls-blinken-tucker-trolls-new-york
    But there was another interesting nugget from that interview. Putin mentioned that he and Tucker Carlson continued speaking for a bit after the cameras were turned off, and one thing Putin mentioned to Tucker was how U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has spoken about his ancestor fleeing anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia multiple times. Putin made a couple of points about that: first, that Blinken bringing up these events from 120 years ago is a way of denigrating Russia, but also, Blinken is implicitly admitting that the Ukraine didn't exist as a nation then:
    We have it all in our archives. Blinken's great-grandfather really left the Russian Empire. He was born in Poltava province [which is in present-day Ukraine; see map below], and lived later in and left Kiev for the United States. The question arises: Mr. Blinken believe this is ancestral Russian territory, Kiev and the surrounding area, first. Second, he says his father left [anti-] Jewish pogroms in Russia... he believes there was no Ukraine in 1904.

    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

      "the Ukraine didn’t exist as a nation then"

      Don't confuse 'nation' with 'state.'

      Nation: a large group of people of the same race who share the same language, traditions, and history, but who might not all live in one area

      State: a country or its government

      There are many nations, probably most of the nations on the planet, which have never had their own state - the Kurds, Kashmirs, Karens, Uighurs, Tuaregs, Apaches, even the Palestinians.

      1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

        misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

        misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Sorry, but a "Ukraine" of any sort really didn't exist until the early 20th century. Prior to that, the area was parts of the following (not an exhaustive list):

        Austria-Hungary/Austrian Empire
        Russian Empire
        Kingdom of Poland
        Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
        Grand Dutchy of Lithuania
        Kievan Rus
        Crimean Khanate
        Romania
        Principality of Galicia-Volhynia
        Golden Horde

        So which one of these is the ancient state and nation for the modern people?

        1. mtrueman   1 year ago

          "Sorry, but a “Ukraine” of any sort really didn’t exist until the early 20th century."

          Not as a state, but as a nation? If they weren't Austrians, Hungarians, Poles, Lithuanians, Romanians or Russians, they must have been something else. Ukrainian is as good a name for them as anything. Nations are groups of people bonded together by traditions, language, religion etc. There are thousands of distinct and not so distinct nations on the planet. Less than a couple hundred are lucky enough to have their own state. I don't think it's right to treat stateless nations as somehow lesser human beings, or hold it against them. Isn't that what the whole project of the Enlightenment was about?

          "So which one of these is the ancient state and nation for the modern people?"

          That's a matter for modern people to sort out, preferably by compromise and peaceful negotiations with other modern people. Ukrainians missed that opportunity when, acting on instructions of Boris Johnson, they rejected the chance offered them.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            There's a reason Ukraine is so screwed up today. It's a cleft country between West and Orthodox. The history of who ruled what should tell you what's going on there.

            1. mtrueman   1 year ago

              Most if not all countries manage to peacefully accommodate more than one nation. You can't let Ukraine off the hook so easily. The fact that there are two religious factions is no excuse for being a failed state. Better to look at the actions of the government in Kiev, suppressing the Russian language, and eventually shelling the Donbas separatist regions. Had it been up to me, I would have preferred a single state within its currently recognized borders, tolerant of national differences and where individuals are equal under the law. Same as my position on Israel/Palestine.

          2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

            misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

            misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

    2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago (edited)

      So what?

      There was no Poland, no Latvia, no Lithuania, no Estonia, no Finland, etc. There are many countries that are today were not independent in 1904. Does that imply Putin wants to reconquer the whole of the old Russisn Empire to its greatest extent? Should Imperial Germany, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire also be given back their former territory? Or should we go back earlier, like 1604, when Kiev was part of Poland-Lithuania and the Crimea, part of the Ottoman Empire?

      The Russian Federation recognized Ukraine’s independence in 1991. What was the case in 1904 does not matter. It does not make Putin's claims that he should own Ukraine and its people correct.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        So what?

        Obviously not privvy to the exact conversation and am no 12D chess master, but I believe it's to highlight the hypocrisy and general interventionism of saying Israel or Palestine is/is not a legitimate country while telling Russia Ukraine is a 100% legitimately functioning state at any/all points within their borders.

        1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

          That is a hell of a reach, and of dubious.relevence for Putin to justify his attempt at conquest.

          1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

            This is just Putin trolling Blinken which I find amusing. And Putin does not want Ukraine. He wants Ukraine to stop slaughtering the Russians in the Donbas provinces.

            1. mad.casual   1 year ago

              ^This.

              "If your grievances about your Grandfather in the portion of the Russian Empire that would later become Ukraine and the persecution of your ethnic heritage there are still legit today, you can fuck right the hell off with your opposition to my defense of ethnic Russians in Ukraine."

              1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

                "Now leave me alone while I persecute these Ukrainians until they are Russians."

                1. mad.casual   1 year ago

                  "Right after you get vaccinated." - The West

            2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago (edited)

              Putin does not care about anyone getting slaughtered. His decision to go to war is directly responsible for the deaths of at least one million people thus far from both sides.

          2. mad.casual   1 year ago

            Given that Putin's been peddling the 'Ancestral Russians' and 'Russian People' shit and people have been pointing at him going "OMG! Hitler! Yugoslavia!" since Crimea, the fact that you think it's a reach says more about you than me.

            To the point that I would explain that it's not an attempt to justify his conquest but to point out that it's not really in the US's vital interests or necessarily any of the US's business, but I don't think you're listening and/or care.

            1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

              Because that was the same class of crap Hitler used to justify gobbling up Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland.

              Putin is up to his armpits in blood because of his aggression.

              1. Sevo   1 year ago

                All he's missing are some Ukrainian POW carcasses dropped inside Russia; 'they were attacking us!'.

              2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Putin's no more guilty of some great Judeo-Christian moral sin than the US is for conquering the North American continent.

                I'm not saying that as some sort of moral relativistic flex, either. This is what sophisticated societies and regional powers have done since the ancient Sumerians--attempt to conquer their neighbors to either chase them off, or take over their lands. And the people they're invading have the right to defend themselves, up to the point they either kick the invaders out, lose enough to decide that vassalage is preferable to death, or get wiped out down the last man, woman, and child.

                Portraying him as a monster and the second coming of Hitler is fine, but it's a mistake to think that he's just doing this for shits and giggles, as opposed to a sincere belief that it's in Russia's best interest, irrespective of what the west might think.

                And make no mistake, the reasons he's being portrayed as a Baba Yaga go far beyond just his military conquests or suppression of his political critics. It's rooted in the fact that he refused to be the West's puppet like Yeltsin was, even though he was open to friendly relations to the point that he even asked about Russia joining NATO back in 2000, and that the deterioration of relations between the countries are largely due to lasting neocon rage that Russia didn't remain a malleable client state after the Cold War.

                1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                  "And make no mistake, the reasons he’s being portrayed as a Baba Yaga go far beyond just his military conquests or suppression of his political critics."

                  Maybe so, but his military conquests are more than enough reason to condemn him. And his political critics come from all over the political spectrum. Painting them all as neocons and Western stooges is disingenuous.

                  I accept Putin's motives. I don't approve of his methods. An ex-officer in the KGB, he must have had other means at his disposal. Nobbling elections, assassinations, threats, bribery, honey pots, propaganda, false flag ops, a nasty business, to be sure, but certainly short of invasion and war.

                  1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                    Maybe so, but his military conquests are more than enough reason to condemn him. And his political critics come from all over the political spectrum. Painting them all as neocons and Western stooges is disingenuous.

                    It's not disingenuous at all. It's simply Cold War, Redux.

                    An ex-officer in the KGB, he must have had other means at his disposal. Nobbling elections, assassinations, threats, bribery, honey pots, propaganda, false flag ops, a nasty business, to be sure, but certainly short of invasion and war.

                    All tactics that he used as well. NATO's 2008 Bucharest declaration was the line he expected them not to cross, and now, instead of stating that Georgia and Ukraine will eventually be NATO members, both states are now too "hot" to incorporate--unless, of course, Ukraine wishes to become part of the Polish Empire again.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "It’s not disingenuous at all. "

                      Maybe not. Do you truly believe that anyone who is critical of Putin is a neocon?

                      But otherwise I agree with you to an extent. I think Putin is an intelligent, capable leader who cares for his country and people. He has his faults and I wouldn't consider myself a supporter, but I was disappointed that he launched the war on Ukraine instead of finding some other way to get what he wanted. I was under the impression that people from the intelligence community had contempt for brute force military solutions and sought to finesse solutions through persuasion, stealth and deception.

                    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                      Maybe not. Do you truly believe that anyone who is critical of Putin is a neocon?

                      Do you like to ask loaded questions?

                    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                      I was under the impression that people from the intelligence community had contempt for brute force military solutions and sought to finesse solutions through persuasion, stealth and deception.

                      What the CIA might want and what the State Department wants don't always mesh. But anyone thinking a color revolution is going to work on Putin is delusional.

                    4. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      " But anyone thinking a color revolution is going to work on Putin is delusional."

                      That's not at all what I meant. I was disappointed that Putin couldn't work his KGB voodoo on the Ukrainians rather than siccing his army on them.

                      "Do you like to ask loaded questions?"

                      It's completely sincere. You wrote:
                      It’s (disapproval of Putin) rooted in the fact that he refused to be the West’s puppet like Yeltsin was
                      There are plenty of people who aren't neocons who disapprove of Putin. It seems you dismiss them or don't recognize them. Out of ignorance, disingenuousness or some other reason, I don't know. Hence the question. You don't need to play games with me. It's a sincere question.

              3. mad.casual   1 year ago

                Because that was the same class of crap Hitler used to justify gobbling up Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland.

                So it wasn't actually a hell of a reach and the whole ethnic solidarity/unification narrative isn't really isn't new. Huh.

                Putin is up to his armpits in blood because of his aggression.

                And? So it Israel, so is Gaza, so is Ukraine. Whether you think one side or the other is justified or not, the narrative is originalist ethno-nationalism on both/all sides.

                1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

                  No it is not new. It is still crap that is rationalizing a whole bunch of deadvpeople.

                  1. mad.casual   1 year ago

                    Was there ever a time in history when waving a signed pact stopped the rationalization of deading a whole bunch of people?

                    Certainly understandings of both sides have been reached and signing of pacts have stopped further deadings but I struggle to find a time when someone had reached the conclusion to dead some people and someone else said "But you signed a paper!" and changed anyone's mind.

                    To wit, it seems like mutual understanding is more important than signed papers.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      Signed papers are how states signal mutual understanding.

                    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                      Signed papers are made to be broken.

                    3. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "Signed papers are made to be broken."

                      So are any mutual understandings. You're not an anarchist though, so what's your beef? Is there anything to it other than cheap jack cynicism?

                    4. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                      Is there anything to it other than cheap jack cynicism?

                      Are you saying that's not a justifiable conclusion? Because there's a about 10,000 years of human history showing that to be the case.

                      Shit, one of the conclusions I arrived at after reading a book on Arabic history was how shockingly easy supposed allies would stab each other in the back over the most ephemeral of perceived short-term gains. Trying to crowbar everyone under some peace-brokering "international community" after the World Wars was always a pipe dream.

                    5. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "Are you saying that’s not a justifiable conclusion?"

                      Yes, I am. Treaties and pacts etc are not made to be broken. Not unlike couples don't get married just so they can later get divorced. It is true though that treaties, pacts and marriages are not necessarily permanent. Things change. It's the cruelest law of the universe.

                      "international community”

                      I kinda agree. Inter national - between nations. I'm not keen on dividing up the planet into nation states. It seems a recipe for eternal squabbling and conflict. I'm more of an anti-state anarchist, where everyone is lovey dovey with everyone else.

                    6. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

                      "Was there ever a time in history when waving a signed pact stopped the rationalization of deading a whole bunch of people?"

                      But that is not the contention. The contention is whether Russia's actions are justified.

                      "To wit, it seems like mutual understanding is more important than signed papers."

                      Signed papers are a record of what the mutual understanding has been. I am not sure how a "mutual understanding" is possible at all. The question is one of legitimacy, and under your notion, there really can be no "mutual understanding" that is worth anything at all.

      2. mtrueman   1 year ago

        "The Russian Federation recognized Ukraine’s independence in 1991."

        By your own logic, we're not bound to the arrangements of 1991 any more than we are to those of 1904 or 1604. What was the case in 1991 does not matter, to borrow your phrase.

        " It does not make Putin’s claims that he should own Ukraine and its people correct."

        His case for the Donbas and Crimea is fairly strong as the inhabitants strongly identify themselves as Russian, rather than the Ukrainian. See my earlier comment about the difference between members of a nation vs. citizens of a state. I'm not here to justify the invasion, but give the reason why Russia has an interest there. It's much the same as why Russia has such an affinity to Syria, home not to Russians, but a good portion of the world's population of Christian Orthodox church outside Russia's borders.

        1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

          Actually, yes, by current international law the Russian Federation is bound to honor its recognition of Ukrainian sovereignty.

          Putin keeps saying, that Ukrainians are really Russians. By the logic of his statements, he thinks the entirety of Ukraine and its people are rightfully Russia's property. There is no logical stopping point for the argument he has made other than the conquest of Ukraine. His "interest" has directly resulted in the deaths of around one million people thus far. It is the interest of a mob boss.

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            " There is no logical stopping point for the argument he has made other than the conquest of Ukraine. "

            I think there is a logical and practical stopping point. Once the Russian speaking breakaway provinces have been secured and annexed. A permanent occupation of resentful Catholics to the west would cause no end of trouble for the Russians. It's not all that different from what the Israelis face with their occupation. I don't see any country willingly taking on such a burden.

            "Actually, yes, by current international law the Russian Federation is bound to honor its recognition of Ukrainian sovereignty."

            I agree we should all follow international law more carefully. The Russians are at least doing that in Syria where they were invited by President Assad. That's more than can be said of the US who received no invitation and are there contrary to international law. What we need to do is to look at motives, and I think the Russian motives - protecting Donbas's Russian speakers are arguably noble. A lot nobler than US motives for being in Syria.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies (TY, C_XY):

              “I don’t hate Jews…”

              Followed by lies justifying why the asshole hates Jews:
              “… The only reason I’m labelled antisemitic is that I oppose the policies of Israel – occupation, apartheid, genocide etc…”

              misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.
              misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

        2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

          misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

          misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

          misconstrueman would do the world a favor by eating a bullet.

      3. Zeb   1 year ago

        Of course no one should own anyone. But all of this is just more good reasons why I don't want to be involved in any way.

    3. Zeb   1 year ago

      My great grandparents immigrated from there at around the same time and definitely considered themselves Ukrainian and not Russian. There definitely was and is a distinct Ukrainian national identity. Of course that doesn't necessarily mean that the current borders of the nation state of Ukraine are sacred and to be defended at all costs. The people actually living there should probably have something to say about it.

  46. Roberta   1 year ago

    Is soup on Mona Lisa representing Warhol vs da Vinci?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Only if that soup is Campbell's and not some other generic brand.

  47. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>well-established pattern of Hamas using civilians, including the sick and wounded, as human shields

    in Houston they use their own children

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      In Houston "they" use "their" own children.

      Bigot.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        just as HPD, after research I chose my pronouns carefully

  48. Dillinger   1 year ago

    couldn't help but notice the lack of Kirby's quote along the lines of the Israelis are taking even more care going door-to-door than the US would ...

  49. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Does Tom Suozzi's Long Island congressional seat flip tell Democrats how they ought to message on immigration?

    what it tells is some asshole (D) who lost his seat to the other asshole (R) got the seat back for the next 8 months

  50. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Climate activists wreaking havoc on D.C. this week:

    ya how about O, H, and Brennan wreaking havoc on D.C. since 2015 ... or do you guys not substack?

  51. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Rachel Dolezal

    not news.

  52. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>This is, uh, not the right takeaway from the Fani Willis scandal, by The New York Times:

    what does the melty-smiley-emoticon represent?

  53. AT   1 year ago

    Both could be true, and Israel must continue weighing whether raids like these are worth the cost

    Of course they are. The only reason Israel has for backing off this is because of bad press. Which is clearly a paper tiger they no longer pay any mind to. They know the global media industrial complex has it out for them, so why subvert their own interests trying to appease something that'll never be appeased?

    So they'll continue undeterred. Exterminate Hamas/Palestine. It's well overdue, and Israel no longer gives any f's about what anyone has to say about it. Good. Let the sissy Harvard students have a laughable 12-hr hunger strike. Let the rainbow cult cry tears for those who would happily chuck them off a rooftop. Let the indoctrinated TikTok stars feign outrage at a place they couldn't find on a map with labels. When I read the headline, my first thought was, "Too bad it isn't "Israel razes hospital.""

    Which is precisely what they should do to all of Gaza. Every brick of every building standing. Then pump nerve gas through all tunnels they find beneath the rubble. Israel gave them more than enough time to flee. Anyone who stayed behind has made it clear that they side with the enemy. So be it.

    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

      "Then pump nerve gas through all tunnels they find beneath the rubble. "

      Zyklon B would be the far superior choice. If only for the shits and giggles of it all.

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a pathetic anti-semite.

        misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit.

        misconstrueman would do the world a favor by eating a bullet.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!