Another Damn Impeachment
Plus: Suozzimentum, gun factories, body-count discourse, and more...

If at first you don't succeed: On their second attempt, House Republicans have successfully impeached Alejandro Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary, in a 214 to 213 vote.
Mayorkas has made history as the first sitting cabinet member to be impeached since 1876. It's unlikely this will progress in the Senate, as members are likely to dismiss the charges.
"Since this Secretary refuses to do the job that the Senate confirmed him to do, the House must act," said Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.). Republicans have charged Mayorkas with "willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law" as he deals with the influx of migrants at the southern border.
"History will not look kindly on House Republicans for their blatant act of unconstitutional partisanship that has targeted an honorable public servant in order to play petty political games," said President Joe Biden in a statement last night, calling the impeachment a "political stunt."
"House Republicans will be remembered by history for trampling on the Constitution for political gain rather than working to solve the serious challenges at our border," said a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson.
Many constitutional law experts have claimed that House Republicans "presented no evidence that Mr. Mayorkas's conduct rose to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors," which remains the "standard for impeachment laid out in the Constitution," per The New York Times. The three Republicans who broke with their party and refused to vote in favor of impeachment—Colorado's Ken Buck, Wisconsin's Mike Gallagher, and California's Tom McClintock—expressed concerns along those lines.
Santos out, Suozzi in: Though I generally try to ignore Long Island as much as humanly possible, it does seem that a congressional district was flipped there last night. Democrat Tom Suozzi won in the special election that was held after Republican drag queen and former Rep. George Santos' seat was vacated following a fraud scandal.
New York Democrats underperformed in the 2022 midterms, so this win is actually of some significance. Suozzi's opponent, Mazi Pilip, tried to make New York City's migrant influx the headline issue of the race, but it didn't work: the Democrat was perceived as fairly moderate by voters, not a radical or someone who bears any responsibility for New York City governance.
Scenes from New York: The oldest gunmaker in America, Remington, is closing its upstate New York factory and moving operations to Georgia, which the company says is friendlier to gun rights. "When Remington leaves, it's not going to be like a facility leaving, it's going to be like part of your family has moved off," Ilion resident Jim Conover, who started at Remington in 1964, told the Associated Press.
QUICK HITS
- "I daresay that Carlson did, indeed, have a nice time when he visited Moscow," writes National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke in a searing takedown of Tucker Carlson's Moscow fawning. "As a rich foreign tourist who was being carefully minded by the Russian government, he was undoubtedly exposed to the Moscow that its champions wanted him to see. And that city, I'll wager, is pretty swell."
- "C.D.C. Considers Ending 5-Day Isolation Period for Covid," reads a New York Times headline from today, as if anyone was still doing a five-day isolation period.
- Truly:
A thing that is lightly hilarious is weird redpill/trads inventing statistics and then running around yelling about the statistics they invented. The average American woman has had 4 sexual partners. The vast majority of women do not … do any of this. Go outside. pic.twitter.com/znTUMbYqcA
— Jane Coaston ????️ (@janecoaston) February 13, 2024
- I always appreciate whenever Paul Ehrlich circulates on Twitter, mostly because it provides an opportunity to talk about how wrong his predictions were:
Note that Paul Ehrlich didn't show remorse for what he spread. "My language would be even more apocalyptic" if he were writing today, he said in 2015. After all, letting families have as many children as they want is like letting them "throw as much of their garbage into their… pic.twitter.com/XETvXd2LbL
— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) February 14, 2024
- A Georgia judge will decide whether Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must be taken off her Donald Trump election interference case, given the revelation that Willis had a romantic relationship with the special prosecutor on the case.
- Good thread:
When some people look back fondly on the "Cold War Consensus," what they miss is that said "consensus" is a fairly brief artifact of its time, one shaped by a narrow media and ideological environment that was aggressively policed.https://t.co/QQwNGPvM8R
— Brandan P. Buck (@brandan_buck) February 13, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
On their second attempt, House Republicans have successfully impeached Alejandro Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary...
Oh please let this be the norm for all of them.
I'm still surprised the Republicans didn't have something ready to go on day one, particularly for Garland. It's not like there was a shortage of illegal actions to choose from.
Because half are fucking idiots and the other half are beholden to the same folks as Mayorkas.
We could hope that we have the best government that money can buy. But that's almost certainly wishful thinking.
Well most of them are certainly bought.
Sadly, it probably is. The best government that can be bought still sucks.
...the Democrat was perceived as fairly moderate by voters, not a radical or someone who bears any responsibility for New York City governance.
It's all about how you let yourself get portrayed.
Just like Biden. A moderate democrat a libertarian could be confortable voting for, reluctantly of course.
If bohem had any sense of honor he would commit ritual suicide
Boehm reluctantly and strategically lacks honor.
"I will vote for Jo Jorgensen—unless I believe there is a chance that Joe Biden will somehow fail to win Virginia, in which case I will vote strategically and reluctantly for Biden." - Slick Eric
Isn't that a form of suicide?
It should be career seppuku .
All Republicans who voted to remove Santos should be primaried.
Do not care what he did. You do not see Dems tossing out their corrupt members. Ever.
Menendez sure as hell will never get removed.
You do not see Dems tossing out their corrupt members. Ever
Anthony Weiner is shaking his dick at you.
Resigned. Not voted out by Dems.
I'd say try and do better...but you cannot.
Well, it's no secret that turd does lie, pretty much constantly.
Pelosi forced him to resign, you idiot.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
No, she did not.
I won't even waste the time asking for your evidence because "your ass" would not qualify.
I'm bored, I will.
Hey, Plugly! Can we get a citation?
Be prepared for a link he won't have read that says the opposite of what he claims.
But I bet it'll have and astonishing headline.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
BREAKING NEWS!
CDC Discusses Easing Five-Day Covid Isolation Guideline
The Biden administration is considering changes to Covid-19 recommendations that Americans isolate for at least five days after testing positive, following new timelines adopted by Oregon and California.
OMG! When did our Dear Leaders decide to kill grandma? (Not counting that guy in NY we no longer talk about)
When did our Dear Leaders decide to kill grandma?
There's an election coming up. Gotta fill the rolls with new expired voters.
The natives defeated smallpox, they can handle covid.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/ceq/news-updates/2022/12/01/white-house-releases-first-of-a-kind-indigenous-knowledge-guidance-for-federal-agencies/
The natives were great worriors, they started out fighting Boston, and ended up defending Santa Monica...
My grandma was a great worrier.
I feel sorry for Canadian natives, a lot of the government stuff for them is so crammed with wokespeak it's almost impossible to parse. Plus they're being gaslit by the Liberal Party into believing that their education system was the equivalent of Hitler's ovens, even though not a single death has been attributable.
Oh FFS, all these idiots need to visit the Rez, and not some canned tour either. Actually drive through government housing etc, and see how much the 'indigenous' people actually respect their environment. Hint, not nearly as much as they claim. See the packs of half feral dogs running loose everywhere, see all the trash and broken cars and appliances on the street etc (note I grew up on the Rez and live next door to another and used to work on it so, yes, I know what I'm talking about).
Christ, no kidding. I think I’ve seen one rez in my lifetime where the inhabitants actually gave a shit about taking care of it, and that was the Isleta Pueblo reservation south of Albuquerque. There’s still quite a bit of squalor there, but at least a good chunk of the residents actually seem to give a crap about taking care of their homes and making them look nice.
Hell, the only reason we even have all those pueblo ruins in the southwest is because the people just abandoned them and left them to rot--not just the smaller temporary shelters, but big-ass settlements like Chaco and Bandelier.
Also, that memo is so clearly a bunch of "Noble Savage" Rousseauian bushwah that it's a joke.
The Biden admin must have been impressed by that shaman at the WEF.
How will Taylor Lorenz survive!?
‘Mayorkas has made history as the first sitting cabinet member to be impeached since 1876.’
Another Biden administration first!
BTW, Joe remembers when he impeached Belknap.
Let give credit where credit is due. The Republican Speaker did this in only two tries. And the opposition was bipartisan. Republicans could not pass a bill on the border, but they could get this done. Pathetic.
Funny way to spell "based", shill.
Mayorkas lied under oath numerous times and is breaking the law. The fact that congress didn't convict him unanimously the first time is the real disgrace.
I am unaware of this supposed perjury. What exactly were the numerous lies?
Probably because CNN and MSDNC didn't tell you. You'll have to settle for the committee's own words in the WSJ:
"Under oath, he claimed to have operational control of the border, as defined by the Secure Fence Act, only to say later that he never made such a claim. He even testified that “the border is no less secure than it was previously”—a demonstrable lie. Mr. Mayorkas has also obstructed congressional oversight, forcing the committee to issue two subpoenas for documents, which are still unfulfilled."
Why We Impeached Alejandro Mayorkas
So he was impeached over a subjective statement, not a demonstrable lie? Like one of the GOP who voted against it said, this vote is over a so-called policy difference.
It was demonstrable... and utterly fucking obvious. You're not really earning your fifty-cents here, are you.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2
They DID pass a border bill. Way back in May.
Schumer has ignored it for months and now demands the House pass his.
He can go fuck himself.
It's easy to forget reality when the media will carry the water for your lies.
HR 29 is on the table, too.
You may be behind in your Civics class and may not know that both the House and the Senate have to pass a bill. The Senate took longer for their bill to come to a vote. Had the Senate bill not been spiked by Republicans a conference committee from both houses would have drafted a bill to pass. The Republicans got a compromise bill in the Senate and could have asked for more in the conference committee. As is no bill has passed, as the snorting walrus demanded. No bill passed because the Republicans, scared of their shadows, killed the bill.
Conversely, the Senate could have taken up the House Bill HR2 passed in May. Had the House bill not been summarily ignored by Democrats in the Senate, a conference committee from both houses would have drafted a bill to pass. Schumer and the press pretended no such bill ever passed the House.
The House bill that they passed was focused on the border, and did not include a bunch of unrelated foreign aid. The Senate ignored it when it landed on their side of the building, then stoked up the border crisis so that they could stuff their own dream spending plans into a poison-pill-filled bill.
You may be behind in your Civics class and may not know that both the House and the Senate have to pass a bill. The Senate took longer for their bill to come to a vote.
What? No they didn't. The Senate bill is completely unrelated to HR 2, and was drafted in a matter of weeks.
The Republicans got a compromise bill in the Senate and could have asked for more in the conference committee.
Why didn't the Democrats and their GOPe butt boys start working on HR 2 right away, then, o lefty shill?
No bill passed because the Republicans, scared of their shadows, killed the bill.
No bill passed because Democrats, afraid of losing their open border, never even looked at HR 2 or HR 29.
If you check the news reports you will see that a group of bipartisan Senators were working on a bill well before Thanksgiving. They just came to agreement a week or so ago.
If you check the news reports you will see that a group of bipartisan Senators were working on a bill well before Thanksgiving.
Uh, what was wrong with HR 2? Or HR 29? You know, the ones your side keeps pretending don't exist?
And no, a group of 3 GOP Senators working with the Democrats doesn’t count as “bipartisan.”
What was the problem with HR2? Focused ONLY on the border and not shipping most of the money to non-US entities?
The House did its job months ago.
This is ALL on the Democratic Senate.
HR2 passed the House in May 2023.
"Republicans could not pass a bill on the border, but they could get this done."
Could not? Or would not? There's an actual difference.
HR2 has been passed for almost a year parody.
Considering they have passed a border bill and weren't included in negotiations for the Senate bill, which did not take into consideration any of the House Republicans desires, I think you actually mean they refuse to he dictated to by Schumer. That's the real sin, they won't pass a bill they disagree with and had no part in writing and runs contrary to almost everything they've asked for.
But they called it a "Border Bill" so it's what the republicans wanted! Why are they voting again their own interests?!
First, they’ve passed at least one, if not two border bills that the senate has refused to even look at. Fuck off for lying.
Second, three pussy ass motherfuckers crossing over doesn’t make the nay side “bipartisan”. Fuck off with that noise
"Republicans could not pass a bill on the border"
House already did that.
H.R. 2: Secure the Border Act of 2023
This bill makes various changes to immigration law, including by imposing limits on asylum eligibility and requiring employers to use an electronic system to verify the employment eligibility of new employees.
As a rich foreign tourist who was being carefully minded by the Russian government, he was undoubtedly exposed to the Moscow that its champions wanted him to see.
Can Walter Duranty comparisons be far behind.
Almost like what Newsom did with Xi. Not surprising and I think Carlson and most who follow him are aware of that asterisk on his perspective.
I'm just glad nobody is focused on the substance of the interview.
I thought we were not allowed to see content from disapproved sources.
Haven’t had a look at that yet. Actually surprised by the lack of reporting. Will have to listen later.
"Almost like what Newsom did with Xi"
I wonder how much shit they had to pressure wash off of the streets of Moscow before they let Tucker check it out.
Or what Sacramento did for Leonardo DiCaprio.
Cooke's column does dispute Carlson's claim that Moscow is crime free by saying there is a rampant issue with mugging and other petty crimes. The phrase "Potemkin Village" was started in Russia.
Also, the rest of Carlson's remarks at that Dubai Conference are not terribly coherent or sensible.
"Carlson’s claim that Moscow is crime free"
I don't remember that.
I do not either. Something can have less crime than our shithole cities have and still have crime.
I wouldn't want to live in Moscow. Also have even LESS desire to live in Philly, Baltimore, Boston, SF, LA, NYC, Chicago...
We don't talk about that.
It's the new narrative. This BBC one is a true gem of an example. You can almost smell the pants-shitting rage.
Tucker Carlson: Putin takes charge as TV host gives free rein to Kremlin
Pravda would've been embarrassed. Remember, this isn't an opinion piece, this is their actual reporting:
"Vladimir Putin lectured, joked and occasionally snarled - but not at his host.
Tucker Carlson laughed, listened - and then listened some more.
During the American's much-hyped encounter with the Russian president, his fixed, fascinated expression slipped a few times.
Especially when Putin's promise of a 30-second history lesson became a 30-something minute rant.
But for the most part, Carlson seemed to lap up what Russia's president was telling him.
Putin was fully in charge of this encounter and for large parts of it his interviewer barely got a word in.
Instead of pushing the Russian leader - indicted as a suspected war criminal - on his full-scale invasion of Ukraine and challenging his false assertions, Carlson swerved off-piste to talk God and the Russian soul.
The American had touted his sit-down with Putin as a triumph for free speech, asserting that he was heading where no Western news outlets dared to tread.
That's untrue. The Kremlin is simply highly selective about who Putin speaks to. It will almost always choose someone who knows neither the country nor the language and so struggles ever to challenge him.
Carlson's claim also ignored the fact that Russia's president has spent the past two decades in power systematically stamping out free speech at home.
Most recently, he made it a crime to tell the truth about Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Multiple critics - Vladimir Kara-Murza, Ilya Yashin and many more - are in prison right now for doing just that...
The way Carlson was feted in Moscow was extraordinary. There was breathless coverage of his every move from the same TV hosts who usually rail against the West as a mortal enemy.
Like a spurned lover, suddenly given attention, Russia was excited.
And it seems Carlson was moved by his experience, too.
His interview, which included a question about the supernatural, ended with Putin talking about souls.
Both men fell silent for several seconds, before Russia's leader broke the spell.
"Shall we end here?"
Carlson blinked. "Thank you, Mr President."
Was unaware how much of the media insisted on a lecture by Tucker instead of trying to at least comprehend the other side of the story.
I guess reporters in the past who spoke to terrible people were, in fact, traitors. Never knew until now.
I am still trying to figure out what the objection is. I thought TC did ok with the interview, he actually let Putin speak without interruption, and no 'Gotcha' bullshit.
Nobody in American MSM is interviewing Putin. Shouldn't Americans hear what the man has to say?
I cannot believe how terrible our MSM is.
The MSM lies for the MIC. Hearing Putin’s side of the story exposes those lies. Anything outside the approved narrative must be mocked and/or ignored.
This guy has his finger on the fucking button. This alone makes it important we hear what he has to say. The American people need to understand what exactly is motivating him to send 100K young male Russians to their death. His history discussion was helpful to provide context, as he views it.
Really, our MSM are a bunch of damned fools.
What what objection is? Did someone threaten to revoke Carlson's passport if he went to Russia? Most accounts seemed to just mock him for his not-very-investigative interview with the world's most dangerous dictator. I suppose that could be an explanation--Tucker did want to be able to return home.
Putin rejects most interview requests, and admitted picking Carlson precisely because of his pro-Russia bias. But apart from an unfortunate dearth of MSM interviews (he doesn't have to worry too much about elections), we have plenty of information about what Putin thinks and how Putin thinks. We know why he invaded Ukraine--he told us. We know his lies about "no eastward expansion of NATO" by heart already. And we don't actually need to hear Putin's history essay spoken in real time--it's been published.
These criticisms make some sense in the context of limiting information being the new priority of the establishment left. We can't be allowed to hear certain perspectives.
Of course Putin is only going to give interviews to people he thinks will let him make his points. Why would he do anything else?
Man that is a crazy amount of editorializing.
I'm amazed no one brings up Dan Rather's interview with Saddam Hussein.
Or Ashleigh Banfield’s tongue bath of an interview of the Butcher of Baghdad.
Or HBO's coverage of Dennis Rodman's visits to North Korea and Kim Jun-Un.
C.D.C. Considers Ending 5-Day Isolation Period for Covid...
Someone forgot it's an election year.
Lockdowns don't work as well when the guy they want in office is already the incumbent.
Bingo
Washington state is going to give UI to striking workers. If the amount of money paid out achieves a threshold, businesses will have to fund striking workers. Putting UI at risk and undoing the primary purpose of unions who are supposed to fund strikes.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/washington-house-approves-unemployment-benefits-legislation-striking
The primary purpose of unions is to fund pro union candidates.
And vice-versa.
The primary purpose of unions is to enrich union bosses.
^This
Don't forget the politicians they donate too. Wouldn't be a point if they didn't extend their corruption beyond the jobsite.
By have inside men in place for the heists.
Tell me how unions aren't a racketeering outfit. Curly Humphrey would be shocked at how depraved they are now
California and New York companies fleeing their states due to costs. Washington State 'hold my beer'.
The only reason WA's population increased last year was the import of foreign labor (largely H-1Bs). The fleeing is already happening.
Illinois didn't even get that benefit.
Well shit. My wife oversees a plant in Washington. Her company is already considering moving another plant to Mexico. These people are so retarded.
At least we still have no state income tax in WA, although the progs are trying furiously to change that.
"House Republicans will be remembered by history for trampling on the Constitution for political gain
Yeah, how dare they trample the constitution for political gain! They’re stealing our playbook!
The latest dictionaries have a picture of the Democratic Party donkey in the definition of "projection".
House Republicans will be remembered by history for trampling on the Constitution for political gain by impeaching a guy for trampling on the Constitution for political gain.
I will say this: I'm really not a big fan of this impeachment. Turnabout being fair play, and all that, and yes, impeachments are political.
To me, though, this comes down to an argument about policy. They don't like that the policy effectively means letting in waves of migrants. The means to correct policy issues are politics. Convince the voters the policy is bad and then win elections based off of it. It's basically the Andrew Johnson impeachment-they disliked his politics because he was considered a barrier to the political goals of the Republican congress.
IMO the reason this impeachment is good is that it will allow republicans to get out into the open evidence that shows this is being done on purpose.
Of course they’ll find a way to screw it up, but it’s still a good idea.
How so? You know the "trial" in the Senate will be even shorter than the Trump impeachment trials, right?
The problem is the policy currently implemented is likely in violation of the law.
Then we need a new President, since he's the one in charge of administering policy. And since a new Democrat is unlikely to do much different, it's then an issue of political origins.
I dislike it, but a whole portion of the country really likes having immigrants streaming freely across the border. You have to convince those voters that you're right, or else your impeachment does more harm than good for your cause.
This is why the busses are fantastic, it puts the stream of immigrants in the locations that claim to want them in the US. But refusing to do your job, even under orders should be a fireable offence.
Then his boss, Biden, needs to be impeached. What he is doing is absolutely in violation of federal legislation. If Mayorkas is "just following orders" then he and his boss are in violation to their oath of office and should be removed.
Seriously, this is one of the most blatantly deserved impeachments and it's a shame that it was even contested. Meanwhile, an elected member of the House was removed not by voters, but by other representatives on allegations of foul play. I didn't even know they were allowed to do that, but this seems much worse than attempting to remove an appointed position
In a shock to nobody, CBO under projected the actual costs of the inflation reduction act. Will now cost hundreds of billions more.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4459138-greater-than-expected-investment-electric-vehicles-wind-solar-swells-inflation-reduction-act-cost-cbo/
Billions more in borrowed spending will be a boon for inflation reduction.
To the people that sincerely believe that inflation is caused by greedy corporations putting fewer chips in their packages, this sounds perfectly reasonable.
I could not believe the stupidity of that shrinkflation X crap.
Shrinkflation affected Biden's Brain.
But look at it from Joe's perspective.
The highlight of his day is snack time, and Jill lets him choose one thing. When the number of chips in the little bag decreases, it really, really hurts.
I never thought about it that way. You're right.
With DEI laws, government math must yield anti-racist numbers.
Well the immigrant food truck trillions will offset that and more.
I’m sure their estimates on the boon to the economy of immigrants is spot on though.
I'm shocked! Shocked!
A thing that is lightly hilarious is weird redpill/trads inventing statistics and then running around yelling about the statistics they invented.
I don't know that weird redpill/trads are doing it for anything but the light hilarity.
The important thing to remember is that 1 in 4 women are raped on college campus and the $0.75 on the dollar wage gap are sacrosanct facts that we dare not investigate.
https://news.sky.com/story/shocking-attitudes-to-rape-in-south-africa-10433820
South Africans will save us all
Wait until you hear about their attitudes towards white genocide.
If Julius Malema becomes PM there, I fully expect the Western Cape to secede from South Africa. That guy is fucking nuts.
Well, that is just science and stuff.
Feelings make the best data.
Math and science are racist, except for The Science in which it's racist not to follow.
That's all very mysterious, like all religious doctrine.
The high priest will tell you if it's science or not.
I believe all the High Priests, which makes me the one true libertarian.
— Lying Jeffy
Pushing a "top men" fetish on a libertarian site is one of his weirder traits.
Gotta freak out the normies from their conformity factories, man.
So funny how the tables turn.
Those are the ones who get all of the advertising on social media, by…posting to social media. Also, where does the 4 partners statistic come from?
And does it factor in the dramatic drop in lifetime partners between young women and the older women who tended to have fewer?
Yeah, and what about the uggos dragging down the numbers? /s
NO FAT CHICKS!
That reminds me of a sitcom a long time ago in a place called the '90s.
To wit-
Trad wife: "You have no domestic skills, an OF account, a 20+ body count, you detest kids, you're vapid, shallow, unprincipled, and egomaniacal!"
Modern woman: "Nuh uh! My body count is only ~4!"
By contrast:
What happened to 'Menver'? Denver daters say finding love is getting harder
Megan Ulu-Lani Boyanton, The Denver Post on Feb 12, 2024
DENVER — Much to the chagrin of single Denverites, the city’s nationally-recognized nickname, “Menver” — an allusion to the number of available men, ready for relationships — hasn’t withstood the test of time.
One of the earliest mentions of the Menver phenomenon was a 2006 Westword column raving about the male surplus. That still held true eight years later when Pew Research Center crowned Denver as the No. 2 metro area with the highest ratio of employed single men to single women.
But the romance appears to be over. While the city’s population breaks down statistically as 49.5% female, according to U.S. Census Bureau data (which notably doesn’t track nonbinary identities), dozens of singles of different genders, ages and sexualities told The Denver Post that their experiences dating men have predominantly fallen flat since the COVID-19 pandemic. And the popularity of dating apps, including Tinder, Bumble and Hinge, hasn’t helped by mechanizing the process.
Most Denverites are certain the problem is contained within city boundaries, but dating experts from other parts of the country confirm that now is a difficult time for romance across the board
Now for the cream:
Ashley Hughes, 38, remembers when the city’s Menver reputation proved to be true, with “a lot [of men] to choose from.” The North Dakota native first moved to Denver in 2011 at 25 years old. “Back in my 20s, dating was way easier,” Hughes said in a phone interview. “I probably should have taken it more serious.”
Then, Hughes — a straight and single woman — would go out with friends, and get courted by men who would ask them on dates. “As I got older, people do not approach you anymore,” she said. “The effort is so low.”
Leaving aside whether the MGTOW movement is really gaining any traction or not, post-pandemic (for those not familiar, that's "Men Going Their Own Way," basically, guys who've decided the dating scene is more trouble than it's worth and are focusing on their own lives and hobbies instead), the simple reality is that, yes, women you ARE more desirable in your 20s than you are in your mid-late 30s, unless the guy you're going for is in his 50s. Patrice O'Neal even laid it out for you as to how most men think:
But here’s how sad things are. The value of vagina’s only good from 18 to 29. Pussy get old like bread, not like wine. It– I don’t want the waiter to bring me a vintage glass of twat. He’d be like, “would you like a “’52 le stinky vagina from the funk-funk region?” You’d be like, “ugh! “You ain’t got a better year than that? “You ain’t got a…” [Laughs] “got a ’89 down there? Give me a ’89. “I don’t care what it is. Water, just ’89.”
I’m not saying you not sexy if you– if you 40 or whatever. I’m not– you’re beautiful, whatever. I’m just saying 20 is just… 20.
That's how Robin Thicke ended up dating a 19-year-old model at the age of 35, after having been with Paula Patton since they were teenagers.
More to the point, though, is that marriage and relationship rates have absolutely plummeted, and that's mostly due to women deciding that they want to be married to their careers rather than a man.
Nothing inherently wrong with that, just don't start complaining in your late 30s or 40s about how hard it is to find a good man to date. You had plenty of options in your 20s, figured you could wait, and now you're scrambling for the scraps from the Man Table, hoping you find that wealthy CEO who can take you on fabulous vacations that you can show off on Instagram. And most guys these days, as they get older, end up realizing that they don't necessarily need to be with a woman to be happy, because who needs the hassle of living with a competitive western woman who sees every relationship in transactional terms?
I'll be quite honest, dating anywhere sucks right now. Feel happy here if you're already in a relationship of some kind. A major part of the problem is women's expectations have turned majorly delusional.
The "ideal" man these days is a 6-6-6. Over 6 feet tall, earns 6 figures (at least $100,000), and at least 6 inches long. Women whine when men want a younger woman, but fail to notice that every woman is young once. Women then want a tall man who earns a shitload, but fail to notice that only a very small percentage of men are that, and will ever be that.
I bet that many modern women also want men who are simultaneously masculine (with some traditional domineering mixed in) and compliant.
I heard somewhere that 90% of men are only looking for the top 10% of women.
Nope. It's women who are choosier.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dating-study-women-are-choosier-than-men/
And in another, different study.
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26172314
It's easier to be slimmer than taller though.
You might want to read it again because your statement reads as backwards. There are many hypergamous studies both historical and contemporary demonstrating that women's hypergamy (or hypergyny) is more extreme, durable, and persistent than men's across a greater number of categories.
The only time men get more picky about women is in subsistence situations and similar populations with massively lopsided sex distributions.
Men, overall, are less picky because they have the freedom to get it wrong and start over again while women have to try and figure out which, among an increasingly smaller number of available men within their social circle, is a good long term risk. While it's true that women being more choosy hasn't changed, none of the studies (or potentially inaccurate statistics & anecdotal information) cited are giving insight into the current dating scene on the ground.
The rush to blame it on young women seems unfounded and more rooted in misogyny than anything else when it is likely a combination of multiple sociological factors including overall bad economy, reduction in career prospects for young males, loss of community networks that facilitated relationships past school years, false expectations and perception of availability stemming from dating apps and social media, etc.
none of the studies (or potentially inaccurate statistics & anecdotal information) cited are giving insight into the current dating scene on the ground
It's interesting that objective studies across cultures and even, to a degree and as indicated, across species get a parenthetical "inaccurate or anecdotal" while the "scene on the ground" which is largely American, coastal even, and highly contemporary is being asserted as some sort of true fact without which reality cannot be reconciled.
The rush to blame it on young women seems unfounded and more rooted in misogyny
AFAICT, the only one blaming young women around here is you. Which, given the context, seems like a deflection from the feminist ideology that bred the problem, again, one more generation down the line (or two).
"What do you look for in a woman?", asks woman.
"Low standards", says man.
'the simple reality is that, yes, women you ARE more desirable in your 20s than you are in your mid-late 30s'
The rock on which feminism will always founder.
There was an article about 10 years ago by turbo-feminist Jessica Valenti that actually lamented that she wasn’t getting nearly as much attention from men as she used to, even though she tried to frame it as being a relief. Her mind just couldn’t process the fact that she wasn’t getting as much attention anymore simply because she was in her late 30s and didn’t look as good as she did in her 20s.
That's a lot like the damn whining by leftist women that they can't find a traditional male who isn't a conservative.
That "I want to get pounded by a Republican" Twitter post from the 2020 election period comes to mind.
Don't forget the classic formula I mentioned the other day. Men want to (should) date women half their age plus seven. Thicke was aiming in the right direction but over-shot.
Geary actually looks better now after popping out three kids than she did when they got together. I'm not a believer in more cushion for the pushin,' but she was really string-beany when they started dating, due to her modeling requirements. Having kids filled her out a bit more and she looks really good.
“As I got older, people do not approach you anymore,” she said
That is because in parts of the country asking someone out is now sexual harrasment. The only culturally acceptable way is to go online. Online is flooded with guys just looking to increase their body count.
'Suozzi's opponent, Mazi Pilip, tried to make New York City's migrant influx the headline issue of the race, but it didn't work'
Not enough schools, rec centers, and other public facilities have been transformed into "migrant" housing in that district. Yet.
Once again Sleepy Joe gets confused, it is in fact constitutional for the House to impeach any cabinet official for what they perceive as dereliction of duty. Joe must be confusing this with all the unconstitutional acts done by himself.
Hey, man. He's just, like, trying to make Big Snack put more chips in the bag.
So Presidential.
Again, more chips *back* in the bag after VPing off while Chewbacca and Sebelius made them take them out.
But at least Biden pretends to recognize the constitution in words. Or something.
it is in fact constitutional for the House to impeach any cabinet official for what they perceive as dereliction of duty.
Under which section?
Article 2 section 4 and precedent. If A. Johnson can be impeached for not following the law of land as viewed by Congress, so can Mayorkas. If you think that impeachment has any bar that it must arise to, I think your dead wrong. It is the democratic process of firing an official. It is 100% political, and everytime the supporters of the impeached claim it doesn't meet high crimes & m's and everytime they lose that argument unless they have the votes in the House. Shit you can go back to John Quincy's attempt to impeach Tyler for simply veteoing a bill.
"Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors"...
'"I daresay that Carlson did, indeed, have a nice time when he visited Moscow," writes National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke in a searing takedown of Tucker Carlson's Moscow fawning.'
Now which logical fallacy is this?
I always appreciate whenever Paul Ehrlich circulates on Twitter, mostly because it provides an opportunity to talk about how wrong his predictions were…
Nonetheless, the depopulaters persist.
Yeah, like the entire WEF, who wants to go from 7 billion to 700 million or fewer.
90% of you need to go.
Nobody needs 23 years of life.
Carousel.
Renew!
If they want to play lemmings, they need to lead.
"700 million or fewer."
250 million is their new earth-saving figure.
I actually had my 8th-grade science teacher tell me, over 30 years ago, that 1 billion was probably the max number of people the Earth could reasonably sustain.
This Malthusian nonsense has been going on for a while, but it's ramped up since the pandemic because the mass migrations to the west that have been encouraged by western elites have shown how fragile their social welfare systems really are. But rather than discourage increased demand on those systems by limiting or cutting off migration, they're simply doubling down, and openly bragging in some cases that the native populations need to be displaced, such as in Ireland where the current prime minister and former Dublin mayor have both complained that Ireland has too many white people.
"The problem with Scotland, is that it's full of Scotts."
From one of my favorite movies, despite having a very loose basis on the history.
One of the most delicious villians in movie history. Guy gave Allan Rickman's heel characters a run for their money.
"Arrows cost money. Use up the Irish. The dead cost nothing."
Him throwing his son’s boyfriend out the window was classic.
Damn it. Just saw that I spelled "Scots" wrong with two ts. I always struggle with spelling "Scots" and "Finns." I tend to put the double consonant when talking about people from Scotland, but no double consonant when describing people from Finland. It's particularly bad considering part of my lineage is from Finland and from Scotland.
And Red Rocks, I agree. Patrick McGoohan did a masterful job as Edward the Longshanks.
A Georgia judge will decide whether Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must be taken off her Donald Trump election interference case...
She's seeing the value of hush money now, I bet.
The bitch*, set me up!
- Fani Willis
*being the ex wife.
Is Fani related to Marion Dingle-Barry (former DC Mayor)?
You mean Shepilov?
I thought we’d decided hush money is illegal now?
'The oldest gunmaker in America, Remington, is closing its upstate New York factory and moving operations to Georgia, which the company says is friendlier to gun rights. "When Remington leaves, it's not going to be like a facility leaving, it's going to be like part of your family has moved off," Ilion resident Jim Conover, who started at Remington in 1964, told the Associated Press.'
No worries, Mr. Conover. I hear that Gov. Hochul will soon announce state support for a new factory that makes ambi-sexual dispensers for rainbow-scented tampons.
And yet the factory will never get built, just funded by the government long enough to pay off a couple dozen "consultants" who coughed up big bucks to the dems.
I was about to question "rainbow-scented" but then I looked it up.
I was about to look it up, but then decided I didn’t want to question it.
And just think how many undocumented Democrats can be housed in the empty Remington factory.
...said "consensus" is a fairly brief artifact of its time, one shaped by a narrow media and ideological environment that was aggressively policed.
If you say it enough and loudly, while bring to bear everything in your arsenal to silence those outside said supposed consensus, you have consensus.
Heaven help us, we're all Noam Chomsky now.
I know, right?
Everyone except Noam himself, who notices that things are (D)ifferent and is "evolving".
Another Damn Impeachment
Now you know how we felt.
as if anyone was still doing a five-day isolation period
My boss is working from home all week this week after testing positive for covid without symptoms.
Why would you still test, especially if you had NO symptoms.
I might do it if I wanted to work from home all week.
Just declare "I have covid". No test results required.
my entire office and I'm not exaggerating 35+ people have all "tested positive" since Christmas
I had an employee get covid 4 times last 2 years. Then the policy stopped allowing short term disability for covid abd he hasn't had it since.
Same reason TSA still makes us take off shoes at the airport.
Attitude control?
I didn't remove my wallet (wasn't instructed to) at one of the TSA full body scanners, and for my offense, I had to have my balls cupped and get full-body patted down in public. Because the body scanner can't see inside my wallet. They tried to explain that people can carry 'credit card knives' these days or some other bullshit, but:
They didn't look in my wallet. They also didn't explain how they would catch a 'credit card knife' if I put my wallet in the little church offering bowl instead of my pocket.
Asking for reason or logic in the process would be your first mistake. Ask not why, just do as told.
Oh, I didn't ask why.
And I consider the fact that they felt the need to spontaneously explain their bullshit as evidence that they knew how fucked up it was.
This is how the TSA gets red-team’d and constantly has their asses handed to them.
I had to have my balls cupped
Gee whiz. You make it sound like a chore. People in Africa would kill to have their balls cupped right now.
Let’s do this to kids to let them into school!
— Nikki Haley
"Attitude control?"
And when they make me take off my platform boots, it's altitude control.
So, it is not a problem when government bureaucrsts fail to do their jobs as defined by law?
Or does it only depend on what laws they refuse to uphold?
The imminent threat of impeachment sure kept them all in line for almost 150 years!
"willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law".
But since he WAS fulfilling the dictates of the democrat party platform, a not guilty verdict is a forgone conclusion.
The oldest gunmaker in America, Remington, is closing its upstate New York factory and moving operations to Georgia
Hopefully they will start making better rifles. They have been shit for years and ruined Marlin.
Still make decent-ish ammo.
And Ithaca Gun (a superbly ironic name) moved to Ohio.
I once lived down-stream from the original factory, and later had to buy an Ithaca lever-action .22 just because.
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-anti-racism-training-increases-racism-report-finds
In “What DEI research concludes about diversity training: It is divisive, counter-productive and unnecessary” — written for the Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy — Haskell argues DEI training, widely used by corporations, educational institutions and government agencies, is doing more harm than good when it comes to countering racism.
Link to the Foundation Study: https://aristotlefoundation.org/reality-check/what-dei-research-concludes-about-diversity-training-it-is-divisive-counter-productive-and-unnecessary/
Well, no shit. I hope that study was only funded with those funny Canadian dollars.
Are you saying that loonies are gay?
Well, they're two bits short of a dollar. 😉
Toonies are transphobic.
The whole point is to divide people along racial lines to make them easier to control, so it's working as intended.
Anti anti-racism?
Unsurprising
Lol. The DEI struggle session personified. ^
I don’t know who ever thought it was a good idea to convince some of your employees that they are racists and the rest that they are victims of their racist co-workers.
Or better yet they have privilege and they have to give up that privilege and power and that no matter what, they're racists. A lot of people are going to say fuck it, if I'm going to be called a racist and being white makes my life easier why would I want to give that up? Gee, I really want to make my life harder.
Evolution actually favors selfishness, because if you don't worry about yourself,you can't survive long enough to reproduce.
Liz, impeacing mayorkas is a good thing. Like all deep starters he is evil
"all deep starters"
I have to say that a lot of your typing errors are often apt, Reverend.
Bad spell checker, typo, A.I. intervention, or sarcasm?
It's so hard to tell these days.
I'm good at math.
Lol
Let's discuss Mayorkas a bit more.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_09b8f4c2-cae4-11ee-8b5c-cf9b2ebdf848.html
I'd like to know what documents were falsified, what witnesses lied and when did the Republicans shut out the Democrats from presenting a defense? Those seemed to be the defining characteristics (beyond nothing illegal going on) behind the Marxist impeachments of Trump that the writers here were orgasmic about.
The hypocrisy is really quite astonishing. Trump was impeached twice based on evidence that completely exonerated him. Once for calling for an investigation into a crime Joe Biden actually committed, and the second for inciting a riot by telling protesters to behave peacefully and go home, but Reason lost it's shit over it.
Mayorkas on the other hand was impeached for lying to congress and breaking the law by his own admission, resulting in a crisis. And Reason's all "political grandstanding".
The Democratic Party has a firm grip on the current crop of Reasonistas.
In September of 2019, all we had was FJB bragging about getting a prosecutor fired. Trump just wanted the Ukrainians to take a second look into the circumstances. For all anyone knew at the time, a second look would turn up nothing.
Now we have much more cause to believe it is likely FJB was soliciting bribes from the Ukraine.
(Comment made before today's Las Vegas arrest, I suppose.)
Hey, do you want our government officials to obey the law or promote the party agenda?
Next to a declaration of war, impeachment is arguably the most serious authority given to the House
*sigh* speaking of impeachment....
Galaxy brain stuff by the GOP throwing Santos under the bus and then losing the seat, probably permanently.
Always count on the GOP to be politically inept.
That's the current marketing strategy of the uniparty.
"A Georgia judge will decide whether Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must be taken off her Donald Trump election interference case, given the revelation that Willis had a romantic relationship with the special prosecutor on the case."
It is not the relationship that is the problem.
It is her personally benefitting from a financial arrangement involving her office that is the problem.
Also the lying under oath.
Speaks poorly of a prosecution when the prosecutor did the exact thing they are trying to try somebody for.
C'mom, they are unjustly targeting a woman of color.
At least Trump did not use tax dollars for the payoff - - - - - - - -
Oh, wait. (D) must use tax dollars, I forgot.
Now let's look at the why Mayorkas was impeached.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_01d31aea-cab1-11ee-a121-7fed8054fd21.html
You cannot have unfettered immigration across fully open borders without some kind of consequence. It just doesn't work. It's a fantasy when you have any sort of welfare state.
The consequence, clearly, is an overabundance of food trucks.
I bet the media is intentionally avoiding showing all of the awesome food trucks and massive economic benefits of the illegals in the cities they are in.
We can't handle this financial boom.
Keep in mind, just a little under 16,000 additional migrants to Denver in a year, out of that 3 million, has been enough to buckle the city's healthcare system and school district to its knees, and caused an increase in petty crime like the squeegee racket you see in long-time deep blue-voting shitholes like Baltimore.
Now imagine the strain it's putting on the borderlands. No wonder Abbott started shipping them to the peacocking sanctuary cities.
Also bear in mind, the same people whining about all the migrants being bused to Denver were puffing their chests out about the Denver metro's population skyrocketing by 800K people in ten years, along with the cost of living and especially the cost of housing.
And it's not just Abbott sending these people to Denver and Colorado generally--their coming on their own because they think they can get jobs right away. That's how a bunch of them ended up living in mountain towns like Carbondale all of a sudden, which has no resources to support them. And who's giving that that information? Soros's Open Society Foundation and other affiliated NGOs who have enabled these migration caravans for years, with the full-throated support of the Democrats who want to import new voters, and who barely believe that the US should have a border, anyway.
Why can not be asylum seekers be interned pending a decision on their asylum request?
Both the Fort Tejon site near the Grapevine, and the Fort Independence site near Independence, might be good locations?
Per the law, that's actually what's supposed to happen. It's just that it's mostly been ignored.
The biggest thing to keep in mind here is that the Dems and their neocon allies are trying to spin this as something the GOP wants to keep going, which is why they're rejecting these supposed "great" bills that are just the same old re-hashed Gang of 8 nonsense.
The neocons in particular have no fucking answer to the fact that Biden or any other Dem president can rescind the "emergency" declaration any time they feel like it, and that the states can only go through the DC court to get redress in the bill that the Uniparty members passed. They just pretend it isn't even there, and rage about the GOP making the "stupid" decision to reject "the best immigration bill I've ever seen," like that slack-jawed faggot Patterico did a few days ago.
What's being deliberately ignored is the fact that the GOP voters grew increasingly frustrated with the party's efforts to maintain the immigration status quo, starting with the 1986 amnesty. This is the real reason it became Trump's party--because he hammered on the fact that the country needed a more restrictive immigration policy than the one that had been in place since Hart-Celler passed, and that even the GOP didn't want to change it, but nibble around the edges on ineffectual policies and promises the Dems wouldn't follow through on, anyway.
So when the Dems and their "moderate" shills claim the GOP and Trump "want" this crisis to continue, it's a flat-out fucking lie to cover for their own malicious enablement of mass Third World migration, just like the rest of the western world, and under the influence of bad-faith globalist actors, done for the express purpose of a "diversity" fetish and pathological oikophobia.
I was watching Tim Pool's IRL podcast last night that had Michael Tracey on. Tracey kept repeating the same Dem propaganda that the Republicans were stupid not to pass the immigration bill that had what they were asking for. Tim repeatedly had to point out that it had practically nothing in it that the GOP (not the GOPe) wanted, but would codify the invasion and make it legal.
When are people going to be smart enough to realize that the bill's name does not mean what it says: the Affordable Care act made healthcare less affordable, the Inflation Reduction act increased inflation, the Border Security bill practically eliminates border security, and the new National Defense act does nothing to defend our nation.
MAGA!
The Dem Squealers are already in full-throated propaganda mode, such as long-time Denver-area DNC shill Mike Littwin:
The immigration crisis in Denver and other large cities — all of them, not so coincidentally, run by Democrats — is altogether real.
And, at the same time, it’s shockingly phony.
If that sounds confusing, that’s because those who have both fomented and exploited this crisis — starting with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, whose unscheduled busing of unprepared asylum-seeking immigrants from his state to purposely unprepared so-called sanctuary cities is a textbook case of wanton political cruelty — want you to be confused...
This is not about open borders. We can’t have open borders. This is about a humanistic border policy that doesn’t villainize, about humanistic immigration reform that doesn’t force millions to live outside the law, about humanistic immigration laws that befit our nation and its history and about the end of an inhuman and cruel campaign to poison the relations between one set of people and another.
Note the motte and bailey arguments being put forth here, and the glittering generalities, in the service of maintaining the same old system of mass migration, while avoiding the very real fact that there's a cost to allowing anyone to enter the country on cooked-up "asylum" claims. Turns out Cloward-Piven can go in two directions, and these people don't like it.
Replacing the Invalid in Chief.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nuts-and-bolts-replacing-candidate-biden-or-after-convention
The question is who will be the nominee. It will not be Biden.
Exactly, but there is a thorn in the side of any Biden replacement, and she's rather fond of venn diagrams.
What about the Venn diagram that has a circle for Kamala's abilities and a circle for Presidential qualifications?
I'll do it! Just let me get a lobotomy first.
Wow the House impeached Sec. Mayorkas by one vote and it only took two tries. Certainly, an improvement on their record in selecting a Speaker. The real news is that the opposition to impeachment was bipartisan with three Republicans opposing the impeachment, including Wisconsin's Mike Gallagher. This is pathetic and embarrassing for the Republicans and they likely don't even know it. They passed up a bill they will not get again and instead did something to show their own incompetence.
1 try or 2 tries...the SOB is impeached. Now live with the ignominy.
The real news is that the opposition to impeachment was bipartisan with three Republicans opposing the impeachment
Yes, leftists always claim a infinitesimally small minority of Republicans voting with lockstep Democrats is “bipartisan.”
They passed up a bill they will not get again
Pffft...promises, promises. As if we won't see the same shit in 5-10 years.
"Yes, leftists always claim a infinitesimally small minority of Republicans voting with lockstep Democrats is “bipartisan.”"
It's a form of the "one drop rule" that lives on in the heart of every democrat.
Such a retarded talking point you had to post it here too.
Sad.
Consider the source.
How do you solve a problem like Kamala?
https://johnkassnews.com/kamala-fatale-noir/
If Biden is banana pudding, what kind of snack is Harris?
Candy corn?
Tuna past it's sell by date?
Heh. I'm imagining a can of tuna ballooned by botulism.
"...House Republicans will be remembered by history for trampling on the Constitution for political gain rather than working to solve the serious challenges at our border," said a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson.
Many constitutional law experts have claimed that House Republicans "presented no evidence that Mr. Mayorkas's conduct rose to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors," which remains the "standard for impeachment laid out in the Constitution," per The New York Times..."
None of this was of much concern when the subject of the witch hunt was Trump.
If it weren't for selective memory, leftists would have no memory at all.
Memory is what the state tells us happened. Subject to change.
It was a Soviet joke at the time, mostly regarding those officials no longer it the Red Square photos, perhaps now revived:
"You can't change the future, but changing the past is easy."
Good find, Sevo. So true.
Nice
Corruption and trying to steal an election are pretty much the kinds of things the impeachment process was designed for.
Policy differences, eking out a tiny majority voting to impeach, not so much.
But, kids will be kids. Now that the adults have left the party, we can expect more of this--loads more of this.
Houston Church shooter voted in 2020 election. Illegal alien and a felon
tweet
Also shouldn't notice that the bizarrely high per capita mass violence of trannies continues apace.
Maybe humoring mental illness is NOT a good way to improve things.
But like with legalizing crime, telling crazy people they are fine makes the problem go away (at least statistically).
tranny violence HAS to be addressed. We cant just keep ignoring it
Well they are dead now, so problem solved I guess.
When has that ever stopped anyone from voting [Democrat]?
A lot of cemeteries in Chicago can attest to that over the decades.
But people keep telling me that illegal aliens would not vote because they would face deportation.
'people' lie. Especially (D) people.
I hear that in Dr. House's voice.
Another Damn Impeachment
Yes! Few things brighten my day quite like the seething rage and the copious flowing of salty ham tears from the far left, fake libertarian faggots and lipstick lesbians of Reason. Cry, bitch! Cry, cry, and then keep on crying some more.
Hopefully Merrick Garland is next up in the dock!
Geez, I'd hate to hear you in a bad mood.
Should not have impeached the secretary, should have voted to abolish the whole fucking department!
Gosh, how terribly short is the GOP memory. Used to be they saw the DoHS as an unwarranted expansion of the state, now they see it as a sacred tool to fight immigrants. Know Nothings.
Um...do you remember when the DHS was established?
Do you know who insisted that Homeland Security be its own department?
Didn't the GOP sort of create the DoHS in the aftermath of 9/11? Not saying it was a good idea by any stretch.
Yes, and some of us thought it was a bad idea even back then.
Who could predict that airport security theater could turn into border security theater?
That makes me wonder. What would airport security look like with Biden-style enforcement?
When I was coming home from Argentina, circa 1997, the 'security' at the main airport in Buenos Aires was just federal police and army officers with long (automatic) guns. They would open the steel doors to let people into the terminal at predetermined intervals, and then shut them after a few minutes.
So, you had a massive crush of people trying to get to the front of the mob to get through the door next, and it didn't matter if your flight was in 20 minutes or 4 hours, or even if you had a ticket. People pushed and shoved. Elbows flew. Curses shouted in at least 5 languages. Once you got through the craziness at the doors, everything was pretty much fine. You did need a ticket to get on the planes, for instance.
I imagine it would look a bit like that.
The reminds me of similar experiences in Bogota in the early 90s.
But I imagine Biden airport security would have TSA agents helping illegals (i.e. no booked air travel that day) to circumvent the screening areas just because they want to hang out in the terminal. And once inside, they would initially squat in the duty free shopping area before moving on to sanctuary zones that quickly run out of food and space.
Commoners get hassled while terrorists are ignored.
And it takes a bit of arithmetic, but counting the number of hours wasted compared to the average life-span, it's quite easy to find that the TSA division of DHS has cost far more lives than all airline terrorist activities.
Nuh-uh. Time spent in lines waiting for intrusive government "services" is worth way more than time spent doing what you want, and thus a net positive.
Yes, the inversion is the opposite of what Brandybuck suggests. It was the left who decried the creation of the DoHS and Republicans generally supporting it because at creation, it was about "foreign terrorism". Now Republicans are generally skeptical of it and Democrats are its biggest boosters.
Glenn Greenwald pointed this fact out recently on his show- and brought receipts.
No, the Democrat leadership wanted Homeland Security to be a full cabinet department. The Bush Adminstration initially proposed a smaller office to coordinate efforts between security agencies that had been in different departments. They had to accept DoHS as a compromise.
Creating DoHS as its own department was a compromise by the Bush administration with the then Democrat Senate Majority Leader, Tom Daschle. The Democrat leadership was all for it and much of the Patriot Act which included much of the intelligence provisions Clinton had tried to get passed during his presidency.
You mean Democrats have always been fucking ass on civil liberties, and people who continue to buy their lies are morons?
Should not have impeached the secretary, should have voted to abolish the whole fucking department!
Gotta start somewhere.
Maybe the staff will self-deport.
yes.
The oldest gunmaker in America, Remington, is closing its upstate New York factory and moving operations to Georgia, which the company says is friendlier to gun rights.
IIRC, Beretta similarly moved from MD to TN about 10 years ago.
Weatherby went from CA to WY. Ruger went from CT to NC, NH, and AZ.
'....the Democrat was perceived as fairly moderate by voters, not a radical or someone who bears any responsibility for New York City governance....' No he was understood to be a far to the left radical that NYC voters favor and someone libertarians could vote for.
Interesting that Reason and the denizens are debating the legitimacy of impeaching a government official for failing to uphold his office and enforce the law as required by his oath of office while "independent journalists" are finally digging in on the topic that was at the center of the Trump impeachment.
Turns out, not only was the entire thing a hoax, it was much broader and more damning than we have heard.
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1757544504951714198
Turns out, all that crazy stuff about the 5 allies spying on each other's citizens and sharing that Intel was true. Shellenberger et al report that Obama's CIA chief Brennan ordered more than 25 Americans associated with Trump to be spied on by foreign intelligence services as far back as 2015, long before the Steele dossier even existed.
They also report that this is not an unusual occurrence.
Yet here the "libertarians" are, failing to break a single story on any of the greatest violations of our civil rights in our lifetime.
Taibbi talks about how the "this is just a story that we got wrong" angle worked to keep him from looking at this for years.
gracias for posting ^^^
Trump wasn't wrong and didn't make it up when he said the Obama Administration was spying on him prior to the 2016 election.
This is from 2017:
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/351495-it-looks-like-obama-did-spy-on-trump-just-as-he-did-to-me/
"...Trump: I was “wire tapped”
CNN: Haha. That idiot @realDonaldTrump thinks he was wiretapped.
..Six months later..
CNN: Trump was wiretapped..."
And the last was squeezed in at the broadcast equivalent of page 10, below the fold.
I took note that the author of the tweet was one Julian Assange. It made me smile.
Look what happens when you piss off CNN.
If POTUS Trump wins re-election, the payback will be difficult. They're too entrenched. How do you blow up the Administrative state?
Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
print pink slips instead of money for twenty minutes?
Tell them they all won cruises halfway across the Atlantic?
Move their offices to northern Alaska.
I hear Kotzebue, Alaska is nice this time of year.
From the post.
"Unknown details about the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign and raw intelligence related to the IC’s surveillance of the Trump campaign are in a 10-inch binder that Trump ordered to be declassified at the very end of his term, sources told Public and Racket."
The binder story has been floating under the radar for a while now. It's been reported in MSM that a copy went missing and was not found at Mar A Lago. In fact a week or so ago Jack "8-0" Smith was claiming that there are secret rooms there that need to be searched. The conspiracy/reality theory is that this entire prosecution was a setup to retrieve evidence of IC crimes prior to and during the Trump presidency. If Trump is elected in November the shit could really hit the fan with him in control of the DOJ.
I've heard that as well. If I were Trump, I'd keep that binder pretty damn close to me.
And make multiple copies of it and store them in different secure locations. Imagine if the computer repair guy had just turned in to the FBI the Hunter laptop without first cloning the hard drive. That laptop would have had an unfortunate accident and been lost.
The powers that be still managed to "discredit" the laptop story, but at least there is evidence of the Biden family crimes out in the open, for the everyman to see, even if the Bidens might continue to get away with it.
Obama really was a corrupt piece of shit. Yet a very large portion of the country thinks there was something noble and uplifting about that administration. It's really kind of sickening.
The power of propaganda.
You know what other set of conditions haven't been in play since 1876?
Guess I need more coffee. What other set?
2.4 million crossings at the southern border in a single year.
"Wait, there weren't 2.4 million crossing in 1876 either."
exactly.
"You know what other set of conditions haven’t been in play since 1876?"
Hitler? Oh wait, this isn't one of those...
Well it sure as hell isn't George Armstrong Custer.
Interestingly enough, noted historian Stephen Ambrose postulates that Custer could have been a surprise presidential candidate in 1876 (had he survived). Custer was a leading Civil War hero (11-0 in cavalry battles, he led the victory parade after the war, and Grant gave Lee’s surrender table to Mrs. Custer as a thank you for his contributions), the military governor of Texas after the war (and one of the few such governors respected by the local citizenry for his fairness) and also a leading critic of corruption in the War Department in Grant’s administration. In fact he had been to DC shortly before the Little Bighorn battle, to testify against the corruption in the Army. Some conspiracy theorists even go so far as to suggest reinforcements were delayed to get rid of Custer.
Custer didn't need reinforcements, he only needed a little sense. Reno and Benteen did OK against several thousand Indians with a smaller force than Custer, but they maintained a perimeter and fought mostly at long range. The best arms among the Indians were Henry/Winchester and Spencer repeating rifles, with a higher rate of fire than the cavalry's Springfield single-shot breechloading rifles, but only half the range.
Custer gave up that advantage in ranged fire and all control over the battle when he charged right into a large mass of mounted warriors. This mixed his troops into superior numbers of the enemy at point blank range, where a man with a Springfield rifle got one shot and then he was holding an expensive club. It was impossible to separate the combatants, and no one could command a force involved in such a melee. Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull also had no control over the melee, but they did have even more men to send into it, and their men were used to fighting in small groups without an effective commander.
Custer was a good general in the Civil War style of fighting, and that style did beat Indians in the long run. I can see him running successfully for President following Grant. But the Indians' skill at just slipping away when they'd lost the advantage drove him crazy, and at Little Bighorn he was obsessed with bringing the Sioux to a decisive battle and forgot that it was possible to lose that battle.
This was far from the worst US Army defeat by Indians. Custer got less than 300 troopers killed. In 1791, Arthur St. Clair lost 656 men killed out of 1400 force to a slightly smaller Indian confederacy. Nearly the whole US Army at the time was involved plus many militia, and St. Clair's replacement ("Mad" Anthony Wayne) found it simpler to start over and create a new and much larger army, called The Legion of the United States, than to reorganize the survivors and build up from there.
Santa Anna died in 1876.
there was a Little House episode where they were celebrating the centennial 7/4/1876
You would celebrate too if there were no income taxes and no Federal Reserve.
iirc Pa was pissed about something federal & wasn't going to celebrate but Half-Pint changed his mind
"I daresay that Carlson did, indeed, have a nice time when he visited Moscow," writes National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke in a searing takedown of Tucker Carlson's Moscow fawning. "As a rich foreign tourist who was being carefully minded by the Russian government, he was undoubtedly exposed to the Moscow that its champions wanted him to see. And that city, I'll wager, is pretty swell."
A splendidly swell city indeed! Indubitably, most indubitably! Thehn Kyo
“As a rich foreign tourist who was being carefully minded by the Russian government,
CW Cooke thinks it's still 1974. Mr Cooke is free to travel to Moscow, NOT be minded by the Russian government and show us the "real" Moscow.
That would involve something more than shouting at the TV from his armchair.
A thing that is lightly hilarious is weird redpill/trads inventing statistics and then running around yelling about the statistics they invented. The average American woman has had 4 sexual partners. The vast majority of women do not … do any of this. Go outside.
To be fair, the original tweet did specify "modern woman". I like to think she meant "Modern" woman.
I also like how the tweet that immediately followed the one above states:
“I was a college student when I read Mr. Ehrlich’s “The Population Bomb.” I took it to heard and now have no grandchildren”
And the world is still here, famine is lower than it was 40 years ago, and the environment is cleaner than it was 50 years ago. And the weather is nicer.
But she did have children? Why say, "I have no grandchildren" if the main reason you don't have grandchildren is because you didn't have children? Does she not see the connection?
Okay, these are people who tweet on Xitter, so...
I tend to try to think better than this about Liz, but it definitely invokes a "Methinks the lady doth protest too much.", or at least the typical AWFL virtue signalling.
The Tweet doesn't call for them to be burned at the stake or have milkshakes thrown at them. It just vaguely suggests the behavior shouldn't be normal or normalized. Absent any specific slut or real invocation of shaming of said slut or sluts it doesn't even really rise to the level of slut shaming. Certainly not to the level of logistics dictating someone walk home in the clothes they were wearing yesterday.
The only way it makes sense is if you yourself have a 20+ body count and took offense or if, typical AWFL fashion, you don't have a 20+ body count, can't even fathom all the issues that go along with it but, for whatever reason, feel compelled to aggressively white knight for people with potentially few principles and/or poor decision-making skills against anyone who might glance at them sideways.
Even if you were a woman with a standard-issue body count of 4, assuming you're an actual equality of the sexes human instead of a mathematically-handicapped feminist that means pretty much 4 partners for any male son you may have and 20+ is 5+ sons. So, unless you plan on popping out the requisite number of kids to support the 20+ body count trend or violate any vows you may've given, your defense of said number/behavior rings hollow.
Liz is on probation after sending us links to Carnivale Brazil with four pictures, one was wearing a full body sock, one was of three women who were bigger than Lizzo, one was of a shirtless young boy, and the last was a woman practically dressed as the Church Lady (in comparison to the usual Brazil carnivale context).
"Another Damn Impeachment"
Not sure if Liz's headline is pro or anti impeachment but
Just a few years ago Reason was calling for more impeachments
We're in impeachment fatigue after 8 years of Trump.
Yeah, impeachment is so last year.
But, somehow, strangely, Reason will be on board again for impeachments next year if a certain Orangemanbad is president.
Well, it's pretty much a given that "Don" Trump will continue where he left off if he's re-elected.
More "high crimes and misdemeanors" are almost guaranteed.
Oh, that reminds me, today's Trump and Biden articles from my local daily:
Trump:
Biden:
Who's the editor there, sarcasmic's cousin?
It's the Pacific NW so, lots of progtards and their enablers.
Biden's age is not a governing problem because he hasn't been governing for the past 3 years anyway.
It's not his age that's the governing problem, it's his dementia! A 95 year old with clear mind would be fit to be President, but a 35 year old dementia patient would not be. Nor is 59 year old Kamala Harris, to judge by the demented word salad that comes out whenever she goes off script. (Not that she was ever _morally_ fit to boss anyone.)
I hate this stereotyping of the elderly as demented. Most aren't. I'm suspecting the reason we're hearing this so much is that various common taters and political operatives (an overlapping group) are trying to obscure the difference between Trump and Biden. They're both old, but only one of them can't remember how his son died.
the Democrat was perceived as fairly moderate by voters, not a radical or someone who bears any responsibility for New York City governance.
You know who else was perceived as a 'fairly moderate democrat'?
Bill DeBlasio?
David Dinkins?
Jefferson Davis?
Nixon?
GHWB?
GWB?
Nah, it's Jeb.
I didn't know his middle initial lol
"E". John Ellis Bush, hence "Jeb" should really be "JEB", and the B is redundant.
I thought it was JEB!
If you pronounce his first initial but his full middle and last name (J. Ellis Bush), it sounds like jealous Bush, but pronounced with W’s Texas accent.
Rod Blagojevich?
When some people look back fondly on the "Cold War Consensus," what they miss is that said "consensus" is a fairly brief artifact of its time, one shaped by a narrow media and ideological environment that was aggressively policed.
A brief artifact of its time, you say?
Who did Donnie blame for the loss in the NY House seat?
Any of you Peanuts read his Truth Social bullshit?
Any of you Peanuts read his Truth Social bullshit?
No, pedo, we're not as obsessed with Trump as you are.
Trump Blames NY Election Loss On MAGA Supporters ‘Staying Home’—But Voters Say They’re Sick Of House Infighting
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/02/14/trump-blames-ny-election-loss-on-maga-supporters-staying-home-but-voters-say-theyre-sick-of-house-infighting/?sh=30968e642a20
Hahaha!
Donnie blamed you idiots!
Nothing has ever been his fault.
When they clip the quotes and don't give links to the source you know they're spinning. Also, you didn't get past the headline again, did you.
This is why Open Society fired you.
Long Island GOP chose an unknown former Democrat to run against a well known Democrat who held the spot for 6 years. Then a major snow storm hit election day.
Totally a sign.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Shut your dick-sucking hole, Sevo.
Go see a therapist.
Starting to get to you?
Let's hope so. At first I didn't like Sevo's copypasta replies. I thought they were SQRLSYish and got in the way of proper refutation of Shrike's missionary efforts.
But when I saw how much it pissed the shill off, well...
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Same.
misconstrueman is going to get Sevo'ed.
Misconstrueman has done it the hard way; he's earned it.
It might not affect you so much if you didn't lie so much. Give that a thought.
He won’t.
HUNTER BIDEN FAKE SCANDAL UPDATE!
GOP’s Star Witness in Hunter Biden Probe Has Ties to Russian Oligarch
https://www.thedailybeast.com/gops-star-witness-tony-bobulinski-in-hunter-biden-probe-has-ties-to-russian-oligarch
No surprise that they found another pro-Soviet "witness".
Ah yes, attack the witness, not the potential testimony. You'd probably think a star witness in a mafia trial was someone to discount just because he had mafia connections.
Oh wow, a Russian witness in the Ukraine tied to an oligarch who made his money from oil on a matter related to an oil company. That was only 40% of the Ukrainian population at the time.
Next Pluggo might find out there are Mexicans currently in the US selling tacos.
Plug's "gotchas" are always the stupidest.
I'm pretty sure Bobulinski is American.
The Daily Beast article, though, states repeatedly that there was no corruption with Hunter and Joe Biden. It's easy to do that when you can just ignore all of the evidence of corruption. Just say, hey, Bobulinski has "ties" to this big bad Russian rich guy, so any testimony Bobulinski gives is to be thrown out. Never mind that Hunter has ties to the former mayor of Moscow and received a few million from him. No that doesn't mean Hunter can't be trusted. Don't apply standards consistently if you want to be a proper leftist.
Pro tip: to properly commit bribery, you need to give the money to the government official, not the other way 'round.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Was he peddling influence using the name of "Biden"?
No?
Then what is the point of this idiocy?
I forgot: Protect Biden at all costs.
A Russian oil executive working for a Russian oil oligarch with a company who's interest was oil, in a country that was almost half Russian, next door to Russia.
Buttplug's sure that this means something.
It is made-up bullshit.
Go criticize Old Joe for his sloppy Afghan pullout. At least that was real.
It is made-up bullshit.
That could easily describe more than half your comments here.
"It is made-up bullshit."
Outside of the bank records, the 200 bank issued Suspicious Activity reports, Wire transfers from China listing Joe Bidens home address, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners he said he didn’t meet, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners advertising Joe as “The Brand”, the “big guy” and “the chairman”, the two whistleblowers testimonies, 20+ shady Llc's via dozens of shady bank accounts, paid out to 9 different Biden family members, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the 20+ other phone calls with Hunter's foreign oligarchs, the video of Joe bragging about the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor, email showing Joe’s VP office helping Hunter directly, and Hunter’s statements about having to give his father half his income, it's "made-up bullshit".
It's like arguing with a cartoon.
SPB2: That's it? That's all you have? It really is all about Hunter Biden's penis.
It is ALL Hunter had to leverage. It is why Joe repeatedly spoke to Hunter's "business associates" and why they comingled their finances as heavily as they did.
I guess you are pro-capitalism ONLY if it involves selling access to a politician.
And Joe lied on his tax returns, just like Al Capone!
What the Mayorkas impeachment shows is that there is no double jeopardy - which amusingly undermines one of Trump's (weaker) arguments.
Oh, no. We were told for the last few Trump impeachments that the standards of an impeachment in no way are related to the standards for a criminal court. Don't pull this bullshit now.
Also, double jeopardy is when you are tried twice for the same crime. That's not occurred.
You get dumber by the day shrike. Last week the gop flipped votes due to procedural rules.
Still not shrike, you lying POS.
Trump had argued that he could not be tried in one of his cases because he'd already been impeached and later acquitted.
It's not a matter of procedural rules it's a matter of constitutional principles.
This is Trump's filing:
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24351971/23sc188947-motion-19.pdf
Don't blame me for the stupidity or desperation of Trump's attorney.
Reason contributors had already noted that double jeopardy couldn't apply as there was no jeopardy to life or limb, after this ridiculous claim.
Mayorka's going through impeachment twice merely makes it even more obvious. (I suppose some cretin might argue that Trump was acquitted in the Senate and so it's different.)
"Still not shrike, you lying POS."
If not in body you certainly are in spirit.
Hence why he's "Diet Shrike". Different can, but no sugar.
Yes. Impeachment is the first step for a president. He was not convicted. The criminal trial is a second attempt.
Here it is a single attempt due to normative procedural rules in the House.
Glad we could clear it up for you shrike.
Impeachment in the House is not a criminal trial, no matter how you try to spin it bruv.
Take the L and slink off.
Trump was impeached in the House and acquitted in the Senate. Two attempts to get the votes in the House to impeach is not being impeached twice and it certainly isn't acquittal by the Senate.
Now the Senate is certainly going to acquit, as every Dem is going to vote no regardless of what evidence is uncovered/presented.
Twice? He wasn't impeached on the first vote, so they voted again. Still one impeachment.
Impeachment in the House is like indictment by a grand jury, aside from there being no standards as to what constitutes a "high crime and misdemeanor". There are no limits to how often a prosecutor can go back to the grand jury and try again on the same charge.
>>House Republicans "presented no evidence that Mr. Mayorkas's conduct rose to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors," which remains the "standard for impeachment laid out in the Constitution," per The New York Times.
all the love your way and everything but your fetish with citing NYT as a legitimate source will soon require intervention.
Well she also quotes NR so we get the neocon perspective.
ya, see the Cooke post below lol
What the heck does that mean? I'd take it as anything from murder and treason (high crimes) to jaywalking and loitering (misdemeanors), IF an expressly political body considers it serious enough to pursue.
Mr. Emde of Woodbury, Minnesota should know better than to tell the world he's a fucking idiot.
If he knew better, he wouldn't.
>>A Georgia judge will decide whether Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must be taken off her Donald Trump election interference case
if failed lawfare was a giant Ghirardelli Valentine's sampler we'd all have type-2 diabetes.
Failed lawfare? You mean by insisting on prosecutorial ethics?
opposite, I insist on prosecutorial ethics to an extreme the entire breadth of the lawfare is disgusting.
and also much love but ffs where is a complaint about future impeachment weaponry in the Senate Ukraine bill passed yesterday if today we're bitching about another damn impeachment?
>>the Democrat was perceived as fairly moderate by voters
the Democrat was portrayed as fairly moderate to confuse voters.
>>The oldest gunmaker in America, Remington, is closing its upstate New York factory
they waited this long?
I thought they announced this years ago
>>National Review's Charles C.W. Cooke in a searing takedown of Tucker Carlson
you jornolists are a hilariously jealous lot. here's a headline:
Seventeen People Know Who Charles C.W. Cooke Is
More of a below-the-fold, bullet point, factoid really. Maybe something to include in the retraction after accidentally printing his obituary.
She told the WSJ that “everyone” who sees her on the job “walks away fully aware of my capacity to lead.”
She does NOT go on to say that said awareness is that she could not lead a pack of hungry wolves to raw meat.
Alejandro Mayorkas deserves to be impeached, although I don't expect him to be removed.
The stupid quote of the day is Biden calling it a "political stunt". It is no more of a political stunt than any other impeachment is. Biden simply does not like it when the shoe is on the other foot.
Biden also called it "unconstitutional," even though they followed the constitutionally prescribed process. But I guess we already knew that Biden is not familiar with the meaning of "constitutional."
Does he believe the Constitution is absolute.
There is apparently an idea that dereliction of duty is not a "high crime" misdemeanor so impeachment on that basis is against the Constitution. It seems a bit of a sketchy argument.
Jonathan Turley aruged this.
Of course, the House disagreed with him last time.
When someone is murdered by one of the criminals Mayorkas allowed to cross the border illegally, Mayorkas is an accessory to murder. There’s your high crime.
You don't get any higher than that unless it's treason. The Constitution defines that as giving aid and comfort to an enemy of the USA. What about when the accused _is_ that enemy?
What's interesting is that, as late as 2007-2008, Pelosi was calling any impeachment effort of Dubya ridiculous and wouldn't even consider it.
A few years later, her party decided it had to get Trump by any means necessary when their historic determinism got shattered (but not the highest, hardest glass ceiling LOL), and opened the floodgates to making this SOP when they decided to impeach Trump over a fucking phone call when their MUH RUSSIA narrative couldn't be held together.
Yeah, big fucking shock that the GOP is looking to do a tit-for-tat by going after that Nosferatu-looking creep.
The network broadcast and print media egged them on.
The corruption was too obvious to ignore. Only the dimmest among you bought the "Donald Trump, Corruption Fighter" narrative; everyone else saw that he was withholding US government aid in an effort to get Ukraine to announce an investigation of Joe Biden.
One more impeachment ain't much, but it's a good start.
I won’t celebrate until I see Garland’s (metaphorical) scalp nailed to the Senate doors.
Why stop there? They should now impeach everyone in the Biden Administration.
That way, they'd have a real good excuse for not passing any legislation.
"The average American woman has had 4 sexual partners."
Average American woman
Stay away from me
Average American woman
I'm worried about the other three
I love that Jane Coaston believes that people tell the truth when surveyed about their sex lives. It's estimated 20% of the population has an STD, and it was reported that the rate of maternal syphilis (women who give birth and test positive for syphilis) has tripled in the last six years and was over 10,000 in 2022. Congenital syphilis in infants is up 10 fold.
So no, American women do not have an average of 4 sexual partners in their lifetimes. And yes promiscuity has increased significantly in recent years.
Yeah, I think we need to see a cite for Jane's statistic before Bernadine's.
Wasn’t it considered a joke once that men inflate their body counts by at least double, while women claim theirs is about half of what it really is?
Hell, Carrie Fisher even made a joke about something like that, claiming that you can still call yourself a virgin until you actually enjoy the sex.
JD Vance explains immigration and Ukraine and how Republican neocons are setting Trump up for impeachment.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/how-congress-is-pursuing-endless-war-in-ukraine-and-trying-to-stop-a-trump-election/
too local a story for Reason
"Five years after impeaching Trump for refusing to spend money on Ukraine,"
Aka, corruptly withholding military aid in order to force Ukraine to announce a baseless "investigation" into his most dangerous political rival, Joe Biden (he was right about that).
(J.D. Vance thinks you're too stupid to know he just lied to you.)
LOL… Leftard self-projection at it’s finest, “House Republicans will be remembered by history for trampling on the Constitution for political gain”
US Constitution Article IV Section 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion
Must have been from the [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire Constitution I don't have a copy off. Something about Obama being the King and literally destroying Article IV Section 4 with a DACA Kings mandate.
See this post by Jack Marshall.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/02/14/this-is-what-happens/
Alan Dershowitz on the impeachment.
https://twitter.com/AlanDersh/status/1757861775943307384
Isn't Dershowitz one of the folks who regularly went to Isla Pedo with Bill Clinton?
he screams from the mountaintops no, no he is not.
Why is Reason's own Liz Wolfe standing next to Mayorkas in the photo at the top of the page?
Is it time to replace "Potemkin village" with "Carlson city" yet?
Sarc, you can cut the Tulpa act.
Poor Sarc.
And remember, Sarc doesn't spoof people, except those times where it was actually Tulpa.
Sarc, we know it's you, author 1167044.
This is the best you can do?
If you're going to spoof the guy, at least try to actually imitate his writing style. This is just sad.
Cher - Half Breed
Sadly, it probably is.
Sarc hasn't had the best day, week, month, year, or life. Give him a break.
idjit
It went to gray after I logged in. How do y’all know it’s sarc? Is it that same user id that was spoofing handles a few months ago?
It’s not sarc, I don’t have sarc muted and it’s a grey box. It’s either shitsy or KAR or one of those just like him.
That doesn't prove it isn't you.
I can’t prove it’s not me, therefore it is me. That’s their reasoning.
They tell me that my criticism of their reasoning is proof that I’ve never taken a logic class. Yup. That’s what they tell me.
Dingbat, your simple reply was, "idjit". That's not exactly a response one way or the other.
Not shitsy. Just unmuted him an still grey.