Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Joe Biden

Joe Biden's No Good, Very Bad Day

It was a week of bad news for the president. Fortunately for him, he probably won’t remember.

J.D. Tuccille | 2.12.2024 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Joe Biden walks a path from the Oval Office on the South Lawn of the White House. | Julia Nikhinson - Pool via CNP/CNP / Polaris/Newscom
(Julia Nikhinson - Pool via CNP/CNP / Polaris/Newscom)

Some people have unfortunate weeks. But if you're a certain octogenarian chief executive of the United States of America with a reputation for declining cognitive abilities, you just might have a terrible, horrible week that culminates in a purely distilled no good, very bad day of escalating awfulness.

As the incumbent and enormously unpopular resident of the White House, Joe Biden's chief selling point is that at least he's (allegedly) not as bad as presumed main challenger Donald Trump.

"The choice is clear. Donald Trump's campaign is about him, not America, not you," Biden told a Pennsylvania audience on this year's anniversary of the 2021 Capitol riot. "Our campaign is different. For me and Kamala, our campaign is about America. It's about you."

That's a fair enough bid for votes, so far as these things go. But, leaving aside Vice President Kamala Harris for the moment, as most Americans would very much like to do, it's convincing only to the extent that President Biden remembers where "America" is and is clear about the identity of the "you" he is addressing. And as a series of recent incidents illustrate, that's not at all certain.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A Cascade of Mental Slips

"Right after I was elected, I went to a G7 meeting in southern England," Biden said last week at a Nevada political rally. "And I sat down and said, 'America is back!' and Mitterand from Germany—I mean France—looked at me and said, 'How long you back for?'"

Nice catch that Mitterand was French, not German! That's a save. But forgetting that Mitterand has been dead since 1996 and that today's French president is named "Macron" is not.

Later in the week, in New York, Biden twice attributed a supposed 2021 comment by then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel to Helmut Kohl, who held that position in the '80s and '90s and died in 2017.

He also appeared to forget the name of the Hamas terrorist group that attacked Israel while he was updating the press on the continuing conflict.

This, of course, plays into the public's perception that Biden may not be at the top of his—or anybody's—game when it comes to his cognitive status.

Last June, an NBC News poll found "68% of all voters say they have concerns about Biden having the necessary mental and physical health to be president, including 55% who say they have 'major' concerns." A similar 52.21 percent of respondents told pollsters in September that they are "very concerned" about "Joe Biden's cognitive health affecting his ability to serve another term as President effectively."

Many voters are also worried about Donald Trump's mental fitness for office. He feeds into such concerns when he, for example, confuses Republican rival Nikki Haley with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as he did last month. But, in polling, public concerns over Trump's mental health come in significantly lower than those for Biden. Frankly, Trump's brand is vicious rather than addled.

When You Welcome Good News for Your Opponent

So, Biden's team must have breathed a relative sigh of relief when media attention turned on Thursday to Supreme Court hearings on the status of Colorado efforts to bar the GOP's presumed nominee from the ballot. Then again, it wasn't exactly positive news for the current president.

"A clear majority of justices expressed overwhelming skepticism toward the plaintiffs' claim that Trump is disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment because he 'engaged in insurrection,'" reported Slate's Mark Joseph Stern. "Justices across the ideological spectrum suggested that individual states cannot enforce Section 3 against federal candidates, at least not without congressional approval."

Well, at least it was a distraction, right? Biden's main rival looks bound for the ballot, but at least nobody is talking about cognitive decline.

Well, they weren't right up until Special Counsel Robert Hur released his report into Joe Biden's mishandling of classified documents.

Good News, Really Bad News

"Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen," finds the report.

Uh oh.

"We decline prosecution of Mr. Biden."

Whew.

"At trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," notes the report. "He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended ('if it was 2013 - when did I stop being Vice President?'), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began ('in 2009, am I still Vice President?'). He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died."

Ouch. That's not where the White House team wanted this to go. The president himself bitterly responded in a press briefing where he welcomed the decision to not prosecute but denounced aspersions on his cognitive abilities, and insisted "my memory is fine." Then he took a question about Israel.

"As you know, initially, the President of Mexico, El-Sisi, did not want to open up the gate to allow humanitarian material to get in," he answered.

But Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is the president of Egypt.

"Mexico? Mexico? Where did that come from?" asked CNN's Jeffrey Toobin. "That's the only thing anyone's going to remember from this."

In a snap end-of-week poll by YouGov, 47 percent of respondents say Joe Biden's health and age will "severely limit his ability to do the job" if he wins in November. Honestly, 32 percent say the same of Trump, but one third is a hell of a lot better than just shy of half when people are trying to decide which candidate is less bad.

Last week, Joe Biden had a no good very bad day and it's a good bet there are more to come.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: COVID Vaccine Injuries Deserve a Day in Court

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Joe BidenDonald TrumpElection 2024Cognitive ScienceCampaigns/ElectionsPolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (165)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    Of course, the central fact here is that NONE of this is new.
    It just confirms years of facts.
    . . . and nothing happens

    1. Rob Misek   1 year ago

      Yet he can still send troops to die.

      Your feeble mind won’t save you from sharing the gallows with bibi.

      Jews are currently committing a holocaust in Gaza and are denying it even though they’re on trial for genocide today in the United Nations international court of justice.

      Biden is funding the genocide making him and the US complicit. How does that make you feel?

      Netanyahu is responsible for telling the IDF to commit ideological genocide by referencing the Jewish genocide against women and children with the story of AMALEK. Clearly inciting genocide. With over 20,000 non combatant women and children intentionally targeted and killed and IDF soldiers on record rejoicing about it referencing amalek, the effect of Netanyahus instructions are clear.

      Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant said Israel was fighting “human animals” and that they will be “starved of food and water” which Israel has done and continues to do.

      Amichay Eliyahu, the minister for heritage, who suggested dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza; Israel isn’t supposed to have nuclear weapons. Saddam Hussein was hung for crimes against humanity and he didn’t even have WMD much less threaten to use them.

      The country’s mainly ceremonial president, Isaac Herzog, who described Palestinians as “an entire nation out there that is responsible” demonstrates the genocidal intention.

      Biden also coordinated the 2014 coup in Ukraine putting the puppet comedian Jew Zelensky in as president resulting in years of bloody civil war before Russia moved in to stop it. Now Biden funds Zelensky’s Nazi AZOV battalions to do their dirty work.

      1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

        Hallel (a collection of psalms in praise of God) was recited last Friday and Saturday in Gaza for Rosh Chodesh. On Sunday, Israel recovered two hostages.

        That really makes you mad, doesn't it?

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          He's been mad in the sense of insane, nuts, cuckoo for some time.

        2. Rob Misek   1 year ago

          Nothing much surprises me about Jewish genocidal behaviour.

          The Jewish bible, book of numbers chapter 31, describes how as “gods chosen people” these lying wastes of skin are entitled to commit genocide.

          This reflects the current behaviour of Israel today in Gaza, as jews are demonstrating.

          How do you feel about genocide, Jew?

          From wiki.

          Numbers 31 is the 31st chapter of the Book of Numbers, the fourth book of the Pentateuch (Torah), the central part of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), a sacred text in Judaism and Christianity, despite the genocide being narrated without visible censure ….set in the southern Transjordanian regions of Moab and Midian, narrates how an army of Israelite soldiers commanded by Phinehas (commissioned by Moses and Phinehas' father Eleazar) waged a war against the Midianites, killing all men and boys including their five kings, and taking all livestock, women and girls captive. Moses instructed the soldiers to kill all women who had ever had sex with a man, and to keep the women and girls who were still virgins for themselves. The spoils of war were then divided between the Israelite civilians, soldiers and the god Yahweh.[3][note 1]

          1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            Time for another Holocaust , ja herr Misek?

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              I want to know what he thinks the solution is.

              Sending Jews to Madagascar? Driving them into the sea? Baking them in ovens?

              What does Misek think the solution to his Jewish problem should be?

              1. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                Fucking stupid Jew.

                Do you think that I’m going to say, “KILL THEM ALL” so you can cream your slacks?

                No the solution is far simpler and you stupid fucking Jews are making it easy.

                The world just needs to recognize what you really are, the perpetrators of a holocaust today.

                You’ll never be able to say “antisemitism” without being laughed out of the room.

                You’ll never be able to govern, terrorize anyone again. You just lost Israel.

                You’re pariahs. Hahaha

                1. B G   1 year ago

                  The descendants of the people who populated the area 1000 years before the Occupying Roman Empire re-named it after a group of Greek-ethinc people (Philistines) as punishment for a Jewish revolt are de-colonizing their indigenous homeland land of the Arabs who moved into the area 500 years after that, and who later engaged in acts of Cultural Erasure such as building the Al Aqsa Mosque on top of the site of the second (Jewish) Temple of Jerusalem.

                  The idea that "Palestinian Arabs" are indigenous to anywhere on earth is as historically laughable as the idea that cults like "The Order", "World Church of the Creator", and the Aryan Nations were made up of indigenous residents of Kootenai County, ID (to use an example you've got close familiarity with).

                  1. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                    Long before Judaism was a bad idea there were canaanites.

                    Canaanites are the ancestors of both Jews and Arabs. It was 1200BCE when Jews split off claiming land as Israelites, causing the very first conflict between Jews and Arabs in the region.

                    1. B G   1 year ago

                      Jews split off when the religion of Judaism was founded in that location (centuries before 1200BCE based on the fact that the Hebrew calendar has been counted for more than 4000 years).

                      Muslim Arabs started to arrive into the area from other regions starting in the 7th Century.

                      You've never once addressed the fact that the construction the the Al Aqsa Mosque on the site of the 2nd Jewish Temple in Jerusalem (the basis for why Palestinian groups claim Jerusalem is part of their "indigenous" territory) was an act of what would be called "cultural erasure" if it hadn't been done by Arab Muslims; they're really in a bind since no Jews have ever tried to lay any claim on Mecca, and never will. Didn't the Aryan cult where you were "educated" have some note written on a napkin by some obscure member of European Royalty which "addresses" that one?

                    2. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                      From wiki Israelite

                      “ The name of Israel first appears in the Merneptah Stele of ancient Egypt, dated to about 1200 BCE. ”

                      People shouldn’t take history lessons from lying waste of skin Jews.

                    3. B G   1 year ago

                      The the parents of Jesus, and the idea that Mary had never had sex before conception came from Jews, unless it came from a mistake in translation of accounts from ancient languages to "modern" languages in the middle ages.

                      The accounts of the resurrection and every other miracle performed by Jesus came from Jews, unless they were made up hundreds of years later by people who couldn't have been alive to witness any of them first hand when much of the New Testament was written.

                      All of the Disciples were raised as Jews, as was Christ himself.

                      The idea that Jesus was the Messiah was created by Jews.

                      Every idea that's foundational to what you claim is the "religion of truth" was either first recorded by people raised in the Jewish faith/culture, or was first written by people who had no actual knowledge of events at that time.

                      Why be so arbitrary about when Jews are inveterate liars and when they're reliable witnesses just based on whether or not you want to believe a particular thing that was first written by Jews.

                      Odd that if the entire idea of Israel being a place was invented by Jews, that the first references to its existence would be in the history of the Egyptians? Regardless of that, my claim was merely that there were Jews in the area for thousands of years before 1200 BCE, which has nothing at all to do with the use of the name "Israel" for some or all of the region, in response to your claim that the name itself was invented around the time of the creation of Judaism.

                    4. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                      You didn’t have to demonstrate your irrelevance, it’s as obvious as the Kol Nidre is a Jewish plan to lie.

                      Truth is reality and the spirit of truth is God in Christianity. I value truth. Jews advocate lies.

                      Jews are on trial for the genocide you’re committing for all the world to see.

                2. B G   1 year ago

                  "Do you think that I’m going to say, “KILL THEM ALL” so you can cream your slacks?"

                  By claiming that all of the world's Jews (except for the one activist whose opinions you're fond of citing as facts?) are directly responsible for what's happening in Gaza, and saying that you'd like to see them all hung, you've already said "Kill them all". You're not quite as honest about it as the leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah or the Iranian "revolutionary Council" who arms and supplies both of those groups as well as the Houthis in Yemen, but the progression of actual logic as has been well established for centuries (as opposed to whatever your inverted idea of "properly applied logic" is)

                  1. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                    “ By claiming that all of the world’s Jews (except for the one activist whose opinions you’re fond of citing as facts?) are directly responsible for what’s happening in Gaza, ”

                    Cite required you lying waste of skin.

                    1. B G   1 year ago

                      "No the solution is far simpler and you stupid fucking Jews are making it easy.

                      The world just needs to recognize what you really are, the perpetrators of a holocaust today."

                      Right there, you're implying that all Jews, in or out of Israel are "perpetrators of a holocaust". You deny claims you made three posts earlier, you're a provable liar. Just as you're a liar when you claim that saying the "perpetrators of genocide" should be killed thereby equates to your advocating for all Jews (who you consider to be culpable for the actions of Israel in Gaza) to be killed.

                      As far as your repeated claim that all jews are liars, those are nearly constant and shouldn't require any citation. The one exception apparently being Miko Peled, who you've chosen to believe is somehow the one "credible" Jew in the world because he's saying things that you'd chosen to believe before hearing him speak.

                    2. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                      You are a stupid jew.

                      Saying that Jews are committing a holocaust in Gaza isn’t the same as saying that all Jews are.

                      Regarding lying, Judaism is ALL that defines a Jew, and the Kol Nidre chanted in synagogues on the most significant Jewish day of the year is clearly a plan to lie.

                      Hence ALL JEWS ADVOCATE LYING.

                      And once again you stupid fucking Jew that’s not the same as saying that Jews always lie.

          2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

            Misek, I said Hallel too. Felt great. 🙂

            I sleep better at night, knowing that the IDF is killing off every Hamas member in Benjamin (gaza), Judea and Samaria that they can lay their hands on. I donate to them.

            Hamas wants to kill me, simply because I am a Jew.

            1. Rob Misek   1 year ago

              Better watch yourself Jew, since your religion advocates lying, an honest reply, besides giving away your genocidal intentions, will be frowned upon at the synagogue.

              1. Uncle Jay   1 year ago

                Hey, Herr Miske,

                It's Monday.
                So don't forget to polish your jackboots and iron your brown shirts. Otherwise, you'll look out of place at your rally in Nurnberg.

            2. markm23   1 year ago

              "Hamas wants to kill me, simply because I am a Jew."

              If you're not a Jew, remember the Hamas leader who said, "First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people." They plan to kill you also, but a little later. And I'm sure they'd either consider an atheist like me "Sunday people", or move me higher on the list.

              1. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                Take it to the international court of justice fuckwit.

                But get in line. Jews are currently on trial for committing genocide today.

      2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

        You cut and pasted this from another article’s comment section here.

        Unoriginal Nazi.

    2. voluntaryist   1 year ago

      The "front man" is not performing well? So what? Most people will ignore the MSM, the White House, the political show. People have to earn more & more every year to support their master's greed. That is their self-imposed burden, their "duty" to authority, "The Most Dangerous Superstition" (Larken Rose). It's slowly collapsing the US Empire, as all empires have collapsed, since self-enslavement began.

  2. mad.casual   1 year ago

    But forgetting that Mitterand has been dead since 1996 and that today's French president is named "Macron" is not.

    The subsequent rambling that makes it seem like either he or the German Chancellor aren't aware that Brits don't elect a PM or... that he considers himself to be equivalently appointed by a monarch while the other leaders of the G7 are actually asking him "What sort of authority do you think you hold?" is rather telling too.

    It almost makes it seem like he called Macron Mitterand to his face and they're trying to figure out which reality Joe thinks he's in.

  3. mad.casual   1 year ago

    Honestly, 32 percent say the same of Trump, but one third is a hell of a lot better than just shy of half when people are trying to decide which candidate is less bad.

    And probably close to half of them are just mad that he would make them look like fools in any sort of sociopolitical confrontation.

  4. Quo Usque Tandem   1 year ago

    Something’s gotta give here; as in somebody needs to depart.

    But then im really ok with Democrats running Biden another round. They couldn’t do any worse.

  5. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago (edited)

    So who the hell is running the country? Sure as hell ain’t Biden.

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      This is the right question.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        Whoever controls the teleprompter.

        1. H. Farnham   1 year ago

          "And I'm Joe Biden. Go f*ck yourself, San Diego."

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            "Boy, that escalated quickly..."

        2. MatthewSlyfield   1 year ago

          Someone should hack his teleprompter and insert a resignation statement.

    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      Lucky for us the government doesn't run the country. If those idiots told everyone what to do we'd be so fucked.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        So we are just ignoring Bidens entire regulatory framework now? Lol.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago (edited)

          There’s a big difference between making the rules and telling people what to do.

          Keep on defending the idea that the government runs the country you unwitting fascist.

          1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            There’s a big difference between making the rules and telling people what to do.

            These two things are EXACTLY the same. What are you talking about?

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              He will say anything, no matter how retarded, to deflect from Biden.

            2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              Making the rules is the same as telling farmers which crops to plant and restaurants what dishes to put on their menus?

              1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                Yes, you ignoramaus.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  You sure about that?

                  1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    Why don't you just skip to the part where you claim you never said this, or it's the mean girls arguing against the voices in your head sarc.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      The government writes menus for restaurants and tells farmers to grow tomatoes instead of peppers?

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      For someone who claims to be principled, you seem incapable of understanding the term.

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Oh, ok. You know you're wrong so you're launching into attack mode.

                    4. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago (edited)

                      The USDA has myriad rules about farming, under which people can be fined if they fail to obey.

                      Stop pretending you don’t know this.

                    5. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      The USDA has myriad rules about farming, under which people can be fined if they fail to obey.

                      That's what I said. Government makes the rules. But it doesn't tell Farmer Joe to plant corn and Farmer Bob to plant soybeans.

                      You claim it does.

                    6. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      Was Bloombergs sugar soda ban an example of "just making the rules" or "telling people what to do" since you claim there is a difference?

                    7. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Tell me again that USDA rules are the same as telling individual farmers what to plant.

                    8. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      Yes they are the same. In principle. You pretend to be familiar with this concept.

                      Telling a restauranteur that he can't sell sugary drinks at a certain volume is the same in principle as telling a farmer that he can't plant certain crops. It's also the same, in principle, as telling Spirit and Jetblue that they can't merge.

                    9. sarcasmic   1 year ago (edited)

                      Telling people what they can’t do is the same as telling them what they must do. Sure. Keep reaching.

                    10. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      Sarc, the USDA does tell farmers not to grown crops. Hell, they even pay farmers to do so.

                      https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/why-does-the-govt-pay-farmers

                      Paying farmers not to grow crops was a substitute for agricultural price support programs designed to ensure that farmers could always sell their crops for enough to support themselves. The price support program meant that farmers had to incur the expense of plowing their fields, fertilizing, irrigating, spraying, and harvesting them, and then selling their crops to the government, which stored them in silos until they either rotted or were consumed by rodents. It was much cheaper just to pay farmers not to grow the crops in the first place.

                      So yes, they do tell farmers to plant and not to plant.

                    11. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      So yes, they do tell farmers to plant and not to plant.

                      Do they tell this guy to grow corn and that guy to grow wheat?

                      By the way those New Deal era policies you are mentioning are an abomination.

                      My entire original point was that the government doesn't "run the country". More like the country runs along despite, not because of, the government. Ideally all government does is make and enforce the rules. Citing examples where it steps outside that role isn't proof that it "runs the country."

                    12. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      "There’s a big difference between making the rules and telling people what to do."

                      Sarc, you should really just skip to claiming you never said this.

                    13. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      Do they tell this guy to grow corn and that guy to grow wheat?

                      When you pay them not to plant x or y crop, then effectively yes, they are telling him to grow x or not to grow y.

                      Now let's discuss milk dumping.

                    14. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

                      Sarc is now okaying the Pedo Jeffy sea lioning game because he realizes what a moronic statement he made.

                      Sarc, I know you’re a dim witted drunk pushy, but you’re much better off taking the ‘L’ here and walking away.

              2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

                The government writes menus for restaurants and tells farmers to grow tomatoes instead of peppers?

                Yes. All in the name of "health".

                In fact, government is telling Walgreens they cannot close some stores because POC's even though POC's are robbing them blind.

                1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                  Also in the name of "the environment."

                2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I did not know that government tells each individual farmer what to grow and when. I thought it just set the rules. I also had this notion that chefs wrote menus. But I now know government officials write menus for restaurants. Thanks for the edumukayshun.

                  1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    "I did not know that government tells each individual farmer what to grow and when."

                    Elsewhere in the thread you have been shown that it does.

                    1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

                      He’s such a dumb cunt.

                    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      It's got to be purposeful.

              3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                Look at sarc defend over bearing regulations because hey, it could be worse.

                Youre such a dumb person.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  You claim that government writes menus for restaurants and tells farmers which crops to plant, and you say I'm dumb.

                  Sure buddy.

                  1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    That has never been claimed here by anyone except you.

                    You, jeff, truman, and sbp compete daily as to who can be the most disingenuous commenter.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      You defended that by calling me names, so you are indeed claiming it.

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      You were later shown to be wrong about it anyway.

                    3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      Every fucking day.

                      Sarc: "You claim X"

                      Somebody: "That has never been claimed here by anyone except you."

                      Sarc: "You're calling me names"

                      Not even little kids argue like this.

                  2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                    https://reason.com/2024/02/07/elizabeth-warrens-shrinkflation-rant-is-an-incredible-exercise-in-blame-shifting/?comments=true#comment-10434486

                    "Without any personal jibes."

              4. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

                ""There’s a big difference between making the rules and telling people what to do."'

                Get the vaccine else lose your job is clearly telling you what to do.

                1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                  I may just be a simple Ol' country boy, and not sophisticated as the one true Libertarian ™, but isn't making the rules how you tell people what to do?

            3. YehoshuaK   1 year ago

              I think that Sarcasmic's got the right of this one. The government tells members of the military what to do. Where to live, what their tasks are day-by-day. Members of the military take actual specific and detailed orders from the mouth of Mr. Biden and his deputies. Civilians, not so much.

          2. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

            Wut?

            Especially given Biden will send the DoJ after people he doesn’t like.

            What the fuck is wrong with you?

            How am I a fascist sarc? Youre the one cheerleading lawfare against your enemies. Lol.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              Youre the one cheerleading lawfare against your enemies. Lol.

              Out come the boilerplate lies.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                Pathalogical liar sarc. Everyone knows it.

                Youre the one defending state abuses even here. This excuse is even more stupid.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  Youre the one defending state abuses even here.

                  What? Dude, you're fucking mental.

                  1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                    "Without any personal jibes."
                    https://reason.com/2024/02/07/elizabeth-warrens-shrinkflation-rant-is-an-incredible-exercise-in-blame-shifting/?comments=true#comment-10434486

              2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                "Out come the boilerplate lies."

                You were doing this just two fucking days ago in the Saturday thread. Biden has a better memory than you.

          3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

            https://reason.com/2024/02/07/elizabeth-warrens-shrinkflation-rant-is-an-incredible-exercise-in-blame-shifting/?comments=true#comment-10434486

            "Without any personal jibes."

          4. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago (edited)

            here’s a big difference between making the rules and telling people what to do. Keep on defending the idea that the government runs the country you unwitting fascist.

            Sure, you just go right on ahead and do whatever you want… on anything… including building a concrete wall on your property and watch just how fucking fast you realize the government is in fact, running the country, your house, what’s in your refrigerator, the amount of water your toilet can flush…

            1. Zeb   1 year ago

              I think you give them a bit too much there. There are, of course, way too many laws and regulations that get way too far into people's business. But that's not running everything, it's interfering with everything. I think that's a distinction worth making.

              1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

                If what we're really talking about here is 'competency', then yes, you'll get no argument from me.

      2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        "If those idiots told everyone what to do we’d be so fucked."

        They do, and we are.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          They do have too much power and influence, but they don't "run the country" in the same sense that a CEO runs a company. I'm pretty sure that's the point sarc was trying to make. Maybe if people didn't go out of their ways to interpret everything in the worst light possible, the above argument would be slightly less idiotic. Or at least shorter.

    3. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      So who the hell is running the country? Sure as hell ain’t Biden.

      So it doesn't matter that he is senile.

      1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

        Soros finally gave you permission to concede that?

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

          I believe there were some adults-in-the-room beltway journolismingists who admitted there was a "gentlemen's agreement" to not talk about Biden's senility and that agreement might now be too difficult to keep intact.

          1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            I wouldn’t be schooled if it was official editorial policy at most democrat media propaganda organizations.

          2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

            I amazed at how far the left will go to deny it.

            Any negative talk about Biden's cognitive decline is just a right-wing talking point. I actually heard that one recently.
            Their denial is so friggin bad they will attack their own for propagating a right-wing talking point instead of acknowledging what is observable truth.

    4. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      I already have said this in the comments:

      A pack of zoomer interns on the domestic side and dangerous neocons on the foreign policy side.

    5. Ben of Houston   1 year ago

      The Democratic National Committee. For better or worse, the party has been running the country his entire term. On the plus side, this makes his decline less urgent an issue. However, on the negative, this means a group of unelected people not even in the employ of the government control the nation.

  6. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    Democrat tReason just can't find it in themselves to criticize Biden.

    1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      Sarcasmic the Strawman Slayer slays another strawman!

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Consistent strawman generator. The world's first perpetual motion machine.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          That's pretty funny coming from one of the chief whiners who whines about how unfair tReason is to Trump and how they always give Biden and Democrats a pass.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Cite?

            You are still too dumb to understand the actual arguments made. There is a bias by the writers. See the Sullum article retard.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              If I was you I'd bookmark this and bring it up the next time you whined and cried and bitched and moaned and complained about how tReason always criticizes Trump and gives Biden a pass.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                Another strawman. Cute.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  Cry more about how unfair Reason is.

                  1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    Yet another strawman.

              2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

                This coming from Sarc, the ultimate pussy crybaby.

                1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                  Crybully.

                  He deliberately starts shit and the moment someone starts fighting back he cries that he's being persecuted.

                  A real piece of work.

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                    And then he gets pissy when you point out to him that that is exactly what he's doing. I swear some days the only reason he's here is to start a fight with someone, anyone so he can fulfill his victimhood fantasy.

            2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

              "There’s a big difference between making the rules and telling people what to do."

              This is the intellect you're dealing with here.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Do refs tell the teams which plays to run?

                1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                  Are tarriffs telling people what to do or just making the rules?

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    Which USDA rule tells individual farmers which crops to plant?

                    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/E328A%20April%202021-Resource%20conserving%20crop%20rotation.pdf

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      Enhancement Description

                      Establish a Resource Conserving Crop Rotation. Rotation must include AT LEAST one resource conserving crop as determined by the State Conservationist in a minimum threeyear crop rotation.

                      The crop rotation will reduce soil erosion (water and wind), improve soil health, improve soil moisture efficiency, and reduce plant pest pressures.

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      I learned about crop rotation in elementary school. It wasn't invented by government, and I'm sure most farmers would do it regardless of whether or not the government said they must.

                    4. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      ok, ok so yes the government does tell them what crops to plant and how... but I'm sure they would do it anyway.

                      Sarc, master of logic... is this moving the goalposts or no?

                    5. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Yes, you are moving the goalposts.

                      Crop rotation isn't the same as telling this guy to grow wheat and that guy to grow corn.

                    6. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      Telling a farmer he has to stop growing one crop and start growing another is literally telling him what crops to grow.

                      It doesn't matter if you think the farmer would do it anyway. He might come up with an innovative way to do it differently or not at all. It's none of your business.

                  2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    Tariffs influence incentives by making imports more expensive. They don't tell people what to buy and what not to buy.

                2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                  You're claiming that the government just acts as a referee now?

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago (edited)

                    For the most part, yes. It sets the rules and we work within them. There’s a difference between saying “If you produce this then you must follow these rules” and “You are commanded to make this quantity of these things.”

                    Unless Trump invokes some war powers thing and commands companies to make ventilators. But that doesn't happen very often.

                  2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    The referee analogy is no good, because

                    1. The referee doesn't have guns.

                    2. He can't show up and shut down the neighborhood pickup game because they're not following his rules.

                    3. He doesn't have the power to fine the players and/or jail them for not following his rules.

          2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

            You've fallen off this wagon quite a lot this morning.

            "Without any personal jibes."

            https://reason.com/2024/02/07/elizabeth-warrens-shrinkflation-rant-is-an-incredible-exercise-in-blame-shifting/?comments=true#comment-10434486

  7. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

    This is what the 25th amendment is for = POTUS Biden. The SC says he can't prosecute, in part, because POTUS Biden is an elderly man with a poor memory. The White House physician says POTUS Biden is cognitively fit enough to be POTUS. We sure heard about 25A a lot while POTUS Trump was in office.

    This is (D)ifferent, I know. The hypocrisy is dangerous.

    SM is right....who the fuck is running the country right now? BTW, the SecDef is out of commission too. You think there might be higher risk right now? I sure do.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

      Someone from a intel agency?

      According to Schumer they have the power, ability, and vindictiveness to screw a president 6 ways to Sunday just because they didn't like what he said.

    2. YehoshuaK   1 year ago

      25th would be appropriate as a legal matter, sure. As a practical matter, are you sure that Acting President Kamala Harris would be an improvement?

  8. Minadin   1 year ago

    https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/

  9. CindyF   1 year ago

    “Nikki Haley, you know they, do you know they destroyed all of the information, all of the evidence, everything, deleted and destroyed all of it. All of it, because of lots of things like Nikki Haley is in charge of security. We offered her 10,000 people, soldiers, National Guard, whatever they want. They turned it down. They don’t want to talk about that. These are very dishonest people,” Trump said.

    The media pounced -- or was it seized?

    In just one sentence, Trump got the left and their media to admit that Nancy Pelosi WAS in charge of the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Something they had denied for three years. I thought that rather amusing.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      I came to the same conclusion.

      The media was all, in unison - 'Ha! Gotcha! He meant Nancy Pelosi!'

  10. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    If the GOP ran just a normal Republican instead of a congenital liar con-man they would trounce Democrats.

    1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      Why would 2024 be favorable to the challenger?

      A good economy benefits the incumbent. And according to you the Biden economy has been absolutely wonderful since at least 2022.

    2. Brandybuck   1 year ago

      Yup, any normal Republican. Hell, Haley would trounce Biden, even though ever voter would have to hold their nose to pull the level for her.

      We have reached the point in our American Civilization where the top election is between the two worst possible candidates. Last two elections had the two worst possible candidates, and this year looks to be more of the same. Frankly, the election this time will be decided by who the VP candidates are.

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        I would vote for the Green Party candidate before I voted for Nikki Haley.

        Also, I've never pulled a lever to vote, let alone a level.

      2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

        Funny. Because Trump is actually ok. You just hate him.

      3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        "Hell, Haley would trounce Biden"

        What's the difference? Two establishment neocons with similar agendas. The only difference is Biden revels in forcing woke insanity, while Haley pretends it's out of her hands even though it isn't.

        1. Brandybuck   1 year ago

          I see you do not know what "neocon" even means. Congrats.

          1. Sevo   1 year ago

            I see your TDS is so advanced, you'll, lie about the simplest issue to justify your adolescent imbecility.
            Stuff your TDS up your ass; your head is begging for company.

  11. (Impeach Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   1 year ago

    Unlike Sleepy Joe Mushmouth, at least Trump is appatently still mentally competent enough to stand trial.

    Trump should consider using that one as a punchline in his next big campaign speech. I give him my full permission to steal it from me if he wants to.

    1. Jerry B.   1 year ago

      https://babylonbee.com/news/4d-chess-trump-forces-judge-to-grant-full-immunity-after-he-speaks-gibberish-and-shakes-hands-with-air

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Wouldn't happen because with Biden it's (D)ifferent.

  12. Brandybuck   1 year ago

    Anyone younger than mandatory retirement age!

    Yes, Biden is a doddering old somnambulist. But Trump is encouraging dictators to attack countries he doesn't like, and claims the presidency has no limits on power.

    Let's get someone in office who is less than seven decades old. Please. Let's not elect the single oldest president ever.

    1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

      Yeah! Like some ‘moderate’ piece of crap who really is just slow walking the same democrat crap.

      That what you want?

    2. Agammamon   1 year ago

      Biden encourages other countries to attack countries he doesn't like, and has actually acted like the President has no limit on his power.

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

        The left wants a president with no limits on power. They can't get their agenda through Congress. They need it by decree. That's why they feel Trump will be the end of democracy. They want the president to be that powerful.

    3. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      But Trump is encouraging dictators to attack countries he doesn’t like, and claims the presidency has no limits on power.

      Ah, so this is how that talking point is being framed now.

    4. Sevo   1 year ago

      "But Trump is encouraging dictators to attack countries he doesn’t like, and claims the presidency has no limits on power."

      Your TDS is so advanced, you’ll, lie about the simplest issue to justify your adolescent imbecility.
      Stuff your TDS up your ass; your head is begging for company.

  13. Yuno Hoo   1 year ago

    "We decline prosecution of Mr. Biden [because he] would likely present himself to a jury ... as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory."

    W.T.F?! How is this not some sort of malpractice on Hurr's part? "We decline prosecution of this sadistic former-Nazi serial killer [because he] would likely present himself to a jury ... as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory."

  14. JFree   1 year ago

    As you know, initially, the President of Mexico, El-Sisi, did not want to open up the gate to allow humanitarian material to get in," he answered

    It's an easy mistake. You say El Sisi I say El Salsa

  15. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    "At trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," notes the report. "He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended ('if it was 2013—when did I stop being Vice President?'), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began ('in 2009, am I still Vice President?'). He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died."

    Once again, while the White House and the Media were coordinating their Streisand-effect defense, the purpose of this special report was to save the Trump prosecution.

    Had the report claimed that Biden's actions weren't criminal, then neither are Trump's... so how do you declare the act of having classified documents in your home after you're no longer President a crime, without prosecuting one of two people being investigated for the same thing? You claim one of them is innocent due to mental incompetence. This keeps the Trump prosecution alive while letting Biden off the hook.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

      A fascist regime would only prosecute the political enemy de jour and give themselves a pass.

  16. Roberta   1 year ago

    Dementia affects everyone differently. I'm living with an old libertarian who may be known to some of you if you've been around the movement long enough. He can't tell the day of the week, can't remember what I told him minutes earlier, and now he's telling me he can't get out of bed. Yet he can converse about world affairs. He might not recall the name of the president of Egypt, but he'll say so rather than substituting another or another country.

    Biden it appears is affected in his head just where he would need it. He probably can remember the day of the week and what he was told a minute ago, but is thoroughly confused by the affairs of the world, except a vague sense that he's in command.

  17. SRG2   1 year ago

    We must be close to a 25A moment. I just wish the Democrats had the balls to use it. I can't believe they don't see what everyone else does.

    1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

      They won’t humiliate him, which would hurt their brand. Democrats never admit to mistakes. Instead, he will end up backing out of the race die to ‘health problems’. Possibly even resigning, but I doubt that. Kamala isn’t all that popular either, and would be destroyed by Trump.

      Just imagine Trump debating either one of them.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago (edited)

      I can’t believe they don’t see what everyone else does.

      They do see what everyone else does. Their capacity to lie to themselves is what’s so astonishing.

      This is yet another one of those confounding known facts of the current age that will only result in someone standing in front of a podium in twenty years from now and say, "Mistakes were made".

    3. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

      Their hatred and fear of republicans keeps them from admitting the obvious.

      I don't think the dems want the first black female president to be a 25A insert and then lose in the general election.

      Besides all that talk about the 25A when Trump was in office wasn't really about mental health. It was seen as a way to remove Trump from office.

      I agree that the 25A issue is rapidly approaching if not yet arrived. The guy wanted to do a presser to show he wasn't forgetful totally forgetting the fact that he is, and he went on TV and proved it.

  18. Marshal   1 year ago

    The takeaway from this article is that Reason is realizing Biden is going to lose to Trump and their best hope is for Biden to drop out.

    1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

      Bingo. Democrats could give a shit how much Biden hurts the country. At leas the elites and the media people. But it’s so bad for them that they’re even losing leftist kooks like Michael Rappaport.

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      1. Biden won't lose, even if they have to award him 331.9 million votes.

      2. Biden is the best president they could ever hope for. He's literally a puppet in a way not even Kamala would be. This is Weekend at Bernie's tier stuff.

    3. SRG2   1 year ago

      Makes one wonder why so many righties here aren't applauding the Democrats for keeping Biden on.

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        Perhaps you don't have the understanding of people on the right that you think you do.

      2. Marshal   1 year ago

        I don't hear people on the right calling for him to drop out. Are we supposed to believe highlighting his weaknesses so everyone knows about them proves they think he's a good candidate?

        When people look for any justification to turn something that hurts their team into an attack on the other they often end up flailing.

        "Biden Senile: "Righties here" hardest hit.

      3. Sevo   1 year ago

        Given that you're a stupid fuck along with being an obnoxiously arrogant piece of shit, this is not surprising.

  19. Uomo Del Ghiaccio   1 year ago

    While I dislike Trump and don't want him to be president, I'm am much more afraid of Biden our current puppet in chief. I see that there are two options, charge Biden with his many crimes, or declare him incompetent and force him to step down.

    We would have the first female president and she can either talk to us as if we are 3 year olds or with her "Bidenesque" word salads full on nonsense. While these word salads are technically words, then can't be combined into anything that accumulates into a cogent thought.

  20. Ghatanathoah   1 year ago

    It's weird that a smaller percentage of Americans think Trump is senile than Biden, because it's pretty obvious to me that they both are. Based on their debate back in 2020, Biden is probably a little less senile than Trump, because he showed a little more basic impulse control (that might have changed in the past four years, though). But both candidates are clearly mentally unfit for office.

  21. ed tantamount   1 year ago

    Life is better with Joe. If you're not feeling it, then you might want to consider moving to Russia. They need able bodied men, I hear.

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      You might look for a brain; I hear they help idiotic shits like you in understanding things.

  22. PedroMartinez1   1 year ago

    Creepy pedophile president joey is extremely prolific in lying and extremely bad at it. Anyone that isn't braindead can see right through horse-shit running down his chin. His whole campaign is I am not Trump. There is nothing else in his arsenal that he can run on, unless you add a sprinkle of late term abortion. That is it. Everything in his big house tenure, and for his entire life has been a failure, other than making his family and cronies millionaires.

    1. ed tantamount   1 year ago (edited)

      Nah. You cray essé. Homie be trippin’. There's nothing creepy about Jose. Yo, if you want creepy, take a look at anyone in the GQP stable. Yeesh. Those dudes, and the few females, are real nuts. Criminal. Hypocrites. Weird pasty faces. Lots of closed and locked doors...

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        Lots of lies from steaming pile of lefty shit.
        Fuck off and die.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

The Tax Bill Rewards States for Higher Rates of Food Stamp Fraud

Eric Boehm | 7.2.2025 3:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!