Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Endless War

Endless War Continues

Plus: An immigration deal that's already collapsing, more expensive Big Macs, and Taylor Swift (because why not).

Eric Boehm | 2.5.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
The U.S. conducted airstrikes in Iraq and Syria over the weekend. | SRA LEON REDFERN/UPI/Newscom
(SRA LEON REDFERN/UPI/Newscom)

A widening war. American forces bombed Iraq and Syria over the weekend, and more strikes are likely in the coming days. The attacks come in retaliation for a drone strike late last month that killed three American soldiers and wounded dozens of others.

The weekend attacks targeted at least 85 locations linked to the Iranian military and various militia groups supported by it. In a call with members of the media, National Security Council Coordinator John Kirby promised "additional action" in the coming days to further degrade Iran's ability to target American troops.

"The goal here is to get these attacks to stop," Kirby said. "We are not looking for a war with Iran."

Iran likely doesn't want a direct war with the United States either. But the two countries are already in a low-level conflict that could accelerate in ways that neither intends, warns Michael Hirsh, a journalist with extensive foreign policy experience, in an excellent piece at Politico. The combination of an overextended American military and Iran's inability to directly control the groups it funds means that "events are on a permanent hair trigger that is constantly threatening to explode at the slightest pressure. Biden's secretary of state, Antony Blinken, appeared to acknowledge this this week when he suggested 'that we've not seen a situation as dangerous as the one we're facing now across the region since at least 1973, and arguably even before that.'"

Separately, American and British forces carried out a series of strikes Saturday in Yeman that "hit 36 Houthi targets in 13 locations," according to the Associated Press.

Meanwhile, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani—the leader of the country that American troops are supposedly protecting, at American taxpayers' expense—visited some of the militia fighters wounded by those U.S. strikes and issued a statement condemning America's "new aggression against Iraq's sovereignty."

What are we even doing here, you guys?

Immigration deal? Probably not. A bipartisan group of senators unveiled a bill Sunday that would spend $118 billion on a combination of border security and military aid to Ukraine.

The deal would not grant amnesty to anyone who has already entered the United States illegally, would erect additional barriers to future amnesty claims, and would hike funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) so it could keep up to 50,000 migrants in custody. (The figure is about 34,000 today.) The proposal also calls for "effectively shutting down the border to new entrants" if the average number of migrants per day exceeds 5,000 in a given week, The New York Times reports, or if more than 8,500 try to cross the border in a single day.

Much of the spending in the bill would be directed overseas. Politico reports that the deal would send about $62 billion in military aid to Ukraine—more than the entire annual budget of the U.S. Marine Corps, Sen. Mike Lee (R–Utah) notes. It would also send about $14 billion in military assistance to Israel, while setting aside $10 billion in humanitarian aid for Ukraine and Gaza. Another $5 billion would be sent to various countries in the Indo-Pacific region, and about $20 billion would be directed to the immigration issues addressed in the bill.

The specifics of the deal may not matter much, as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.) and several other prominent Republicans have declared the bill a dead letter.

I've seen enough. This bill is even worse than we expected, and won't come close to ending the border catastrophe the President has created. As the lead Democrat negotiator proclaimed: Under this legislation, "the border never closes."

If this bill reaches the House, it will be…

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) February 5, 2024

You can't afford fries with that. Several fast food chains, including McDonald's and Chipotle, will respond to a hike in California's minimum wage for restaurant workers by raising menu prices, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Starting in April, that new law will require paying fast food workers at least $20 per hour, a 25 percent increase over the state's baseline minimum wage of $16 per hour. It will add an estimated $250,000 in annual labor costs for each McDonald's restaurant, and that means more expensive Happy Meals. Chipotle has announced plans to raise menu prices by up to 9 percent, while the California-based Jack in the Box is eyeing an 8 percent increase.


Scenes from Miami: I'm in South Florida for a few days to attend a conference about the future of free markets within the conservative movement. It's hard to imagine a better place for such a gathering than a city that reflects the wonderfully chaotic potential of immigration and relatively unfettered markets.

"If politicians are right about what people want, Miami should be a ghost town," writes National Review's Dominic Pino. Instead, the city is thriving as a crossroads of cultures and an example of what's possible when government gets out of the way:

Is Miami succeeding despite having small government and being a living embodiment of globalization and creative destruction? That's what the prevailing narrative from the economic grievance-peddlers would have you believe. It seems more likely Miami is thriving because of those characteristics. And politicians should know that there are plenty of Americans, in Miami and elsewhere, who aren't crying out for protection from the market.


QUICK HITS

  • Some parts of California are facing a risk of historic floods and devastating mudslides after getting months' worth of rain in just a few days.
  • Former President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping as "brilliant" because he "runs 1.4 billion people with an iron fist."
  • The powerful House Rules Committee will take up two articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas later today, setting the stage for a full House vote possibly as soon as Tuesday.
  • The lower house of Argentina's legislature has approved President Javier Milei's extensive package of free market reforms.
  • Taylor Swift's Midnights won Album of the Year at the Grammys, making her the first artist to claim the top prize four times. Miley Cyrus ("Flowers") and Billie Eilish ("What Was I Made For") won Record of the Year and Song of the Year, respectively.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Americans Unhappy With Politicians They’ll Soon Vote Back Into Office

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

Endless WarIraqSyriaWarFloridaFree MarketsMinimum WageCaliforniaFast FoodImmigrationReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (476)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Some parts of California are facing a risk of historic floods and devastating mudslides after getting months' worth of rain in just a few days.

    No buying water from neighboring states this year I guess.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      BUT WE ARE STILL IN A DROUGHT!

      1. SheenaGray   1 year ago (edited)

        I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and Q straightforward don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me....
        This SITE....> http://Www.Bizwork1.com

      2. TJJ2000   1 year ago (edited)

        Environmental Politicians (specifically Obama) mandated that all rain water is banned for commercial use and must run directly to the ocean….

        And no. I’m not even joking just exaggerating the multiple policies that literally pointed to exactly that.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          That tends to be a western thing, whereby water running across a property doesn't necessarily belong to the property owner. It predates Obama, and even the modern era. Effectively, it bans such things as rain barrels. Our laws regarding water in the Midwest are much different, allowing the property owner to retain water on the property.

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            When I built in the Midwest, it was mandatory that rainwater stay on your property.

          2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            In Idaho and Montana it's not trespassing if you remain in the water it only becomes trespassing if you step out of the water onto dry land. You always get a few though who try and harass fishermen wading in the river or creek by claiming they're trespassing.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        But at least the mud crop will be good this year.

      4. Stuck in California   1 year ago

        For folks not native, that's the California Drinking Game. Been playing it since the days of talking heads on the evening news when I was a young man. Every time a weatherman reports rain, then says "we're still in a drought" you drink.

        You'd watch the weather report, they'd show a landslide or the river flooding and washing out bridges, or tell us all about the record snowfall in the mountains, then say "But we're still in a drought". Every fucking time. Noah could float by on an ark, animals crammed aboard two by two, and the pair of TV weathermen on the bow would probably shout to you "Remember, we're still in a drought!"

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Lol.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Did they build adequate resvoirs to capture and retain said water? Or they just banking on more refugees fleeing for Texas.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        Nope sf is pushing piss water, and Newsom is dumping billions of gallons of freshwater into the ocean

    3. JFree   1 year ago

      Rain in CA is what happens in El Nino transitions

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        Rain in CA is what happens when water comes out of the sky.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          CLIMATE CHANGE!

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Depends. Is the rain water cold or hot?

    4. Minadin   1 year ago

      People who want to live where it never rains (for the weather), and then set nationwide standards for water conservation, while stealing water from people who have the sense to live where it's abundant, can go fuck themselves 10 ways.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        10 ways, dry? That could be painful.

        1. Minadin   1 year ago

          NO LUBE.

      2. Uilleam   1 year ago

        I moved to where it seldom rains to get away from people. They moved here anyway and are using the little bit of water for golf courses. Can we extend your policy to those people as well?

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Learn to golf.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Former President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping as "brilliant" because he "runs 1.4 billion people with an iron fist."

    Loved that COVID response.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Sure the Biden administration is acting like the Chinese government, but if we take Trump out of context... Look! He's praising him!

      1. HorseConch   1 year ago

        Why worry about actions when we have words to prove how bad he is. Have they emptied all the concentration camps he filled in his first term yet?

        1. Minadin   1 year ago

          They need to pass the $120 billion border bill in order for the Department of Emptying Trumps Camps gets its funding.

        2. Nardz   1 year ago

          This is oldest leftist, and centrist, trick in the book- talk about how bad the imaginary will be and respond to it as if it were real in order to ignore the reality that is currently happening.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            The classic leftist dialectic--create a problem, and provide the solution to the made-up problem.

            1. Nardz   1 year ago

              That's one manifestation of it, yes.
              But the other is as I describe below.
              Leftist excess isn't bad in itself, it's bad because leftist excess might push people to the right. The right is, of course, assumed to be bad in itself.
              "Gays fucking on the senate floor is only bad because it strengthens the anti-gay's argument, but otherwise there's nothing wrong with gays fucking in public" basically.

              1. Nardz   1 year ago

                "If gays fuck in public, imagine how bad it will be when the boogeyman makes homosexuality illegal and starts throwing gays from rooftops!"

            2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              You forgot step 1: Decide on an authoritarian power goal.

            3. Ajsloss   1 year ago

              provide the solution to the made-up problem

              The solution must also be a problem in and of itself.

              1. Nardz   1 year ago

                "Climate change" being the most glaring example of the dialectic described by Red Rocks.
                A 100% imaginary problem used to terrorize youth and create necessary acceptance of deliberately lowering the people's quality of life through policy.

                1. Beezard   1 year ago

                  Degrowth!

                  It’s fucking brilliant, really. They know communism will fail human prosperity spectacularly, so now they make it part of the sales pitch.

          2. Nardz   1 year ago

            This is what so many of the "classical liberals" do. James Lindsay in particular is really bad about this. It's a technique used to stifle real opposition and keep everyone on the leftist moral plantation. The left is just going too far, but the right is fundamentally invalid.
            It's not bad to foster delusion and cut off kids' genitalia in itself, it's bad because it might cause people to reject perversion.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Not sure you've ever listened to James Lindsay... his entire podcast is about breaking down the leftist paradigms to expose them.

              1. Zeb   1 year ago

                Yeah, I think Lindsay does a great job of exposing/explaining what's really behind woke leftism. He does have some pretty sharp criticism of some parts of the right, such as the Christian nationalists, and I think that is what Nardz is referring to, but I don't think Lindsay is wrong there and it's fairly absurd to claim his goal is to keep people on the leftist moral plantation.

                1. Nardz   1 year ago

                  Christian nationalists are the furthest "identifiable" group from power and influence possible, have no organization, and aren't even explicitly defined.
                  When Lindsay talks about Christian nationalists, he means anybody who is publicly Christian and/or doesn't hold 100% the blank slatist gay loving civic morality that's taken over since the 90s.
                  They're the boogeyman.
                  Lindsay wants the 2010 status quo and vilifies anything to the right of it.

                  1. Zeb   1 year ago

                    Maybe you know more of his work than I do. Or maybe you are more familiar with his stances from when he was more of a militant atheist. I've watched a good number of his talks and read some of his articles and that's not the sense I get. He seems to spend a lot of time talking to Christian groups for someone who is opposed to Christians having any influence (and I've seen a few recently where I actually started to wonder if he had become a Christian himself). And he's pretty specific about what he means when he talks about Christian nationalists, which is definitely not "anyone who is publicly Christian".
                    I think his point about Christian nationalists, which I think you may also disagree with, is that they are sort of the mirror image on the right of the cultural marxists on the left and as such they are exactly what the radical left wants for opponents so that they can complete their dialectical transformation of society. The whole thing doesn't work if you don't have the reactionary side.
                    I think he might over play that, though. I agree with you that Christian Nationalists have no power or influence on much of anything.

                  2. Beezard   1 year ago

                    I think his fears of dialectical right are well founded. And he routinely lays out the Christian Nationalist reaction as an obvious (probably fed) trap. Not that they’re on the verge of coming to power.

                    I also thought his 3 “problems with classical liberalism” were valid. And underscored why libertarianism is failing this moment so badly.

                    That said, I think there is definitely some truth to your point that his solutions often come off as not doing anything at all. Apart from “naming the dynamic”. When he castigates listeners for arguing back at all, it definitely sends mixed signals.

                  3. Beezard   1 year ago (edited)

                    As far as the Christian thing, He was largely financially backed by a Christian group and routinely does churches for lectures.

                    It seems to me He’s mostly warning them of the trap being set. And maybe telling them they need to get their own house in order in terms of the woke virus before they can be an effective counter revolutionary bloc.

                    His current sales pitch is a faith/reason balance. He’s not Christian and he doesn’t think theocracy is an answer. That’s not the same thing as “don’t be openly Christian”.

                    Also, much of his focus on modern Gnosticism is geared towards underscoring the heretical esoteric religious nature of it for the benefit of Christians in the hole that they’ll clean house.

                    1. Beezard   1 year ago

                      * in the hopes

              2. Nardz   1 year ago

                I've followed James Lindsay for years, and he constantly freaks out about Christians becoming fascists and how the worst thing about the left is that they're going to push people toward the right.
                He'll come right out and say he's more worried about the right than the left when you push him.
                The right has 0 power right now. None whatsoever. Yet James spends half his time attacking the (imaginary) backlash.
                He's good at deconstructing marxism in a philosophical sense.
                He sucks at everything else.
                Notice his specific predictions never seem to come close to fruition.
                He predicted a "drag Floyd" last summer. Went on and on about it for weeks. Didn't happen.
                What did happen is a tranny shot up a Christian school and the establishment rallied to cast her as the victim.
                James' understands only to a point.
                He couldn't understand why there wouldn't be a "drag floyd" for the same reason he was probably surprised a black man was elected president before a woman.
                He understands theory, not instinct.
                Drag Floyd is impossible because EVERYBODY thinks trannies are weird and are grossed out by dudes in dresses. There's an uncanny valley effect, completely different than a black victim of police in context of a society steeped in race mythology and guilt.
                Lindsay has his uses.
                Prescription and leadership very much not included.

                1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                  In a sense, Drag Floyd already happened with the Matthew Shepherd incident--a drug deal gone bad that was recast as a hate crime against homosexuals and made the guy an instant and perpetual martyr.

                  Jussie Smollet tried a two-fer because he's black and gay, but made the mistake of writing a check to his Nigerian rentboys to beat him up.

                2. Beezard   1 year ago

                  I think the dynamic he lays out with “drag Floyd” was true enough. External narrative shit’s just fluctuating so fast it’s already be old news. Gaza and migrants are the shit this week.

      2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        It seems pretty obvious that Xi Jinping is brilliant. And a damn good manager. Guys like that make the trains run on time. Brilliant people can also of course be evil. But that's a different topic.

  3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    I remember a time, not too long ago, when we weren’t dropping bombs in the Middle East.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      The 1980s?

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

        Reagan bombed some sites in response to Beirut bombing. Also honorable mention, Libya but North Africa obviously.

        1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

          He also had an Iowa class battleship hit some of the targets. I remember watching some talking head explaining that the fire control was so accurate that the Navy not only could choose which building to hit, but could chose which window pane to put a 16 inch shell through on that building from over 20 miles away.

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            That's some real fuck around and find out, having a 2000 pound shell coming through your window,fired from over the horizon. One ton of fuck around and find out. They, the battleships, might have been obsolete but they were a thing of beauty. I've often wondered what an updated battleship would look like, using missiles and Aegis intercept radars. The Ticonderoga class cruisers have two vertical launch missile batteries and two mk 45 five inch guns for comparison. But alas it will never happen as the USN is planning on phasing out even cruisers and replacing them with destroyers.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      I don't. Not 1 admin in my 40+ years on Earth hasn't bombed the Middle East.

    3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

      This is why bohem might be the most detestable writer at reason. He fucking shilled for Biden despite every commenter telling him why he was wrong, he got exactly what he voted for, and now he acts surprised and holyer than though. Bohem really should hit up Canada's maid program

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        https://twitter.com/_kruptos/status/1754342750655275403?t=pVCW_kzIYxWSYzrMqs7VnQ&s=19

        “Nationalism” was a tool of revolutionary liberals to undermine traditional communities to build the new liberal democratic national order. Now that liberals have moved on to globalism, they are mad that conservatives fell in love with the nation once their communities were gone.

    4. Rise of the Impedance   1 year ago

      Yes, I miss the good-old-days when we were only dropping bombs on Southeast Asia.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The powerful House Rules Committee will take up two articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas later today...

    Drag his ass. SLAP THAT WRIST!

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Some principled Republican will say that they shouldn't act like what they dislike, and the tinpot dictator will go unpunished.

    2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

      Better yet, whip his ass from horseback.

  5. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    I don’t think I ever heard a Taylor swift song in my life.

    1. Rocinante   1 year ago

      You probably have. You just don't remember it.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        I imagine it’s quite forgettable.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Those A.I. pics of her that were all over the net last week were quite memorable though.

          1. Anomalous   1 year ago

            Didn't see them. Smash or pass?

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              I hadn’t either til just now. They’re not the typical just throw a famous person’s head on a body from a porn scene, they’re…different.

              1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                They claim they are made by AI.

            2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Well now, whatever you think of Swift you probably won't be sorry. Some are funny, others are... ahem...

              1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago (edited)

                Sauce?

    2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      You have, you just didn't know it.

      My daughter points her songs out in movies, TV, and various stores that play music. That shit is everywhere.

      1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

        This is the first, and I think only Taylor Swift song I remember hearing:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aLYvZ5sX28

        I laughed. But I am pretty sure they are all just generic pop whatever. She has a demographic, I'm not it.

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Look at the antihero over here.

    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

      That’s ok. Shake it off.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The lower house of Argentina's legislature has approved President Javier Milei's extensive package of free market reforms.

    Meanwhile it's armageddon when we don't increase the U.S. federal budget by a higher rate than last year.

    1. Roberta   1 year ago

      But they're starting from a far worse position.

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        It would be literal genocide if we didn't raise the federal budget by 10% every year, even if we're borrowing a million dollars a minute to do it.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Taylor Swift's-

    Stop right there.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...a city that reflects the wonderfully chaotic potential of immigration and relatively unfettered markets.

    Well, sure. Those are people fleeing communism. They know firsthand what to avoid.

    1. R Mac   1 year ago

      The irony of course being this administration is actually deporting Cubans for some odd reason.

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        How's that ironic? This administration is staffed by the morons who wore the Che T-shirts in college past freshman year.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          I was wearing my Che t-shirt yesterday. Its caption reads "Communism murdered 100 million people and all I got was this lousy t-shirt".

          1. MK Ultra   1 year ago

            Mine says "Murdering Communist Bastard."

          2. R Mac   1 year ago

            Haha, nice.

          3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            Gay activists wearing Che shirts are almost as Ironic as Gays for Palestine. It's almost Jews for Hitler level stupidity.

  9. Ajsloss   1 year ago

    "The deal would not grant amnesty to anyone who has already entered the United States illegally..."

    But what about our covid experts? Surely, they deserve amnesty.

  10. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Border bill is even worse than imagined.

    Groups with minors don't count against the numbers which will lead to more child trafficking, the bill basically ignores DNA testing.

    All security measures can be undone if the president simply states not in the nations interest.

    Asylum claims are taken from the judicial branch to the executive.

    All lawsuits regarding the bill moved to the left federal loving D.C. circuit.

    Legalizes most border crosses with work permits.

    Those who do end up being turned back can come back in a year and try again.

    Legalizing of the parole method.

    1.8M a year allowed to enter illegally with benefits.

    2B to NGOs helping migrants get to the border.

    The bill essentially legalizes Bidens open border.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      The proposal also calls for "effectively shutting down the border to new entrants" if the average number of migrants per day exceeds 5,000 in a given week, The New York Times reports, or if more than 8,500 try to cross the border in a single day.

      I see Eric couldn't be bothered to read actual text and went with the pro bill narrative. It starts on page 241 of the bill and the text is all over Twitter.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Jeff says it’s impossible to shut the border.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Well thats because for Jeff it is impossible to shut his mouth to stop eating. Bases everything on his own experiences.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            Plus he lies for the left like it’s his job.

            1. Minadin   1 year ago

              'like'?

            2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

              $0.50

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                How many donuts does that buy?

                1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                  Half as many as before biden.

    2. damikesc   1 year ago

      That a single Republican is even considering this is damning.

      Got to get that cash to Ukraine, though.

    3. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      But in exchange for letting in 1.8M more people per year illegally, at least it also gives Ukraine another $60B.

      HOW CAN YOU NOT LOVE THAT?!

      The best of bipartisanship right there!

  11. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    A bipartisan group of senators unveiled a bill-

    NOT INTERESTED.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Can 3 people be called a bipartisan group? And since Sinema is I, shouldn't it be tripartisan if we are going with 1 from each party.

  12. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    A widening war.

    Adults in charge.

    1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Return to normalcy.

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Fucking Trump.

    3. Minadin   1 year ago

      Adults in diapers.

  13. JesseAz   1 year ago

    NYC is infamous for letting violent offenders pleas down to misdemeanor or even not be charged. But if you created a fake vax card... Judge shuts down Braggs political use of office.

    https://nypost.com/2024/02/03/metro/manhattan-da-alvin-bragg-slammed-for-letting-violent-perps-walk/

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Meanwhile Pelosi son avoids charges on his 7th time being surrounded in a felony case. But there is no politicization of the law.

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13023467/Nancy-Pelosi-son-Paul-Pelosi-Jr-charges-federal-case.html

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        That's (D)ifferent.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          And Democracy!

        2. HorseConch   1 year ago

          I'm sure buttplug will be here shortly to defend Hunter and Paul Jr. This has nothing to do with who their parents are.

          1. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

            Why do you keep bringing up hUnTer's PeNiS?

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              Don't recognize the handle, but I see you are perceptive.
              turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
              But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                No idea why but your first sentence made me laugh.

              2. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

                I've been reading the articles and comments for a few years now, but only registered a screen name to post about six months ago. I'm very familiar with SPB's bullshit, and why he has the II after his name. I figured it would be inevitable that he would reply with some form of that trope (Hunter's penis, as he strawmans every criticism of him with that), so I figured I'd preempt it.

                I chose Jefferson Paul because my favorite founding father is Jefferson and my favorite politician was Ron Paul (though the Paul could also stand for his son Rand).

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Good to see Staten Island holding firm in the face of injustice.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    American forces bombed Iraq and Syria over the weekend...

    I'd say wag that dog but I don't think Americans are paying attention to any of it.

    1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      I thought Congress had to declare war.

      There were days that passed before military action commenced. Congress could not deal with that and vote a use of force authorization?

      1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        No, a Democrat is president. No declaration of war is necessary.

        If a Republican were president though, even with a Congressional authorization of force, military action would be illegal.

        I thought we had clearly defined these precedents under the Bush and Obama Administration's?

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          And if Trump were president, we need military commanders who would ignore his orders AND tell the enemy what was (not) happening.

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            And resist his orders to withdraw troops from Syria and Iraq, cry about it to the media until he backs down, then somehow try to still blame him for three troops killed after he left office. The JCs are lucky I am not president. I would order them to report to my office, force them to render the proper greeting when reporting (e.g. coming to attention, saluting and stating General such and such reporting as ordered) and then forcefully reminding them who the CiC is and telling them any act of disobedience will result in me seeking General Courts Martial for disobeying the lawful orders of a superior. And then following through if the cross one inch over that line. It's time the Pentagon, and especially those with to many stars on their shoulders, get reminded about the chain of command. And when the media whines about it, I will tell them straight up, "I am their commander in chief. Per the Constitution they are my subordinates and if they don't like that, they can retire, but they will follow my lawful orders of damn straight I will court martials them the same as any PV1 would he court martialed for disobeying their platoon leader." If they don't want to follow the UCMJ and the Constitution and do their duties, then they can retire.

            I'd also order every single one to undergo their respective branches physical fitness test, within one week of my taking office, plus height weight, and I'm going to find some pissed off ex drill sergeant/instructor, E-7, whose two weeks from retirement to grade it. And damn straight, I'll flag them if they fail. I will demand the higher echelon lives by the same standard they expect the lower ranks to uphold or face the same consequences. I'd also be forcing a lot of 0-6 and above to retire or be fired, as we are way to top heavy currently. We have the same number of flag officers (not percentage, raw numbers) serving as we did during WW2 at the height of the war. At its height there were approximately 16 million service members serving in WW2. There is a little over a million troops in all four branches and three components.

            1. JFree   1 year ago

              No pushups or KP duty?

              1. Sevo   1 year ago

                No, JFuck.

              2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                KP, where utilized (and it's rare outside of a training environment or deployment) is an extra duty not a punishment and generally is assigned to lower enlisted on a rotating basis (and really wasn't that bad anyhow, we often got extra food or special food while on KP). Push ups are part of the physical fitness tests for three of the four branches as a test of upper body strength and endurance. Since your snark implies you didn't know either of these facts, why not shut the fuck up and learn from the subject matter experts? You would do yourself a world of good if you took Samuel Clemens advice and keep your mouth shut more often and not removing any doubt of your stupidity.

              3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                BTW who is the CiC of the US Military and what is the chain of command? What is the punishment for disobeying a lawful orders in the US military?

            2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

              More admirals than ships.

              1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                Yeah. The DoD has definitely gotten to damn top heavy. Ever read Hemry's Stark's War series? It's another example of Sci-fi being a little to prophetic. Then again Hemry was a Naval officer and experienced this first hand.

                1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                  Also he writes under the penname Jack Campbell. If you haven't read his books he tends to focus on the relationship between government and the military and the Stark Series really looks at the disconnect between civilians and soldiers in an all volunteer military that turns into a generational warrior caste, as well as the disconnect between political soldiers who end up in command and how this disconnect between civilians and the generational volunteer military makes it easier for American politicians to start endless, largely unwinnable wars with little actual push back from the population.

    2. JFree   1 year ago

      Americans are irrelevant to whether the US gets involved in Middle East wars

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        Not if there's American troops involved

  15. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

    Reason....Bring back Liz Wolfe! 🙂

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      You know who else kidnapped people in Berlin?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        The Stasi?

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      The begathon is over. They don't need to pretend anymore by having her.

    3. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Can she get a day/week off? It's not like she's an urchin in a monocle factory.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Actually monocle factory urchins had a lot of rights, they could eat food and were guaranteed a bath every second fortnight.

      2. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        Can she get a day/week off?

        Umm, yeah. She had last week off. This is this week.

      3. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Isn't this at least week 2?

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

          Beginning of but man you all are sticklers. Absence makes the heart grow fonder.

          1. Minadin   1 year ago

            I miss the well-aimed snark. Boehm can't pull it off with the same amount of sass.

            1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

              Boehm can't it pull it off with or without sass. Even in articles I ostensibly agree with him on, he makes me cringe.

              1. Dillinger   1 year ago

                I demand urchin and monocles.

            2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Boehm can't pull it off, reluctantly, strategically, or otherwise.

  16. JesseAz   1 year ago

    DoEd wants to spend over 1B a year for college prep for illegals.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/doe-push-forward-12-billion-biden-plan-expand-federal-college-prep-aid-illegal-immigrants

    Cost free no downside.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

      Ensuring no illegal is prepared for collage

    2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      What if we just spent everything we're currently spending on illegals on a fucking border wall?

  17. Ajsloss   1 year ago

    Separately, American and British forces carried out a series of strikes Saturday in Yeman that "hit 36 Houthi targets in 13 locations," according to the Associated Press.

    Yeah, man. Is Yemen transitioning to Oman?

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Noman.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

        NO MA'AM

  18. JesseAz   1 year ago

    America First Legal issues lawsuit showing the government knew of the voting fraud issues in 2020 and sought to censor anyone who highlighted that risk.

    https://twitter.com/America1stLegal/status/1749509703577530503

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      America First sounds a little insurrectiony.

  19. Randy Sax   1 year ago

    "Taylor Swift's Midnights won Album of the Year"

    At first I accidently read "midnights" as "midgets" and the sentence was much funnier.

    1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

      What is the difference between album of the year and record of the year? Ah, the dafuck cares, it's just another entertainment industry self fellating award show anyhow.

      1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        "Record of the year" is what they used to call "song of the year", back when records had songs on them.

  20. Nardz   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/Babygravy9/status/1754471179321225614?t=v1oBVyXwE2TTYJsOT1rHzQ&s=19

    This one quote tweet explains American politics.

    [Link]

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      I wonder how much of his own money he is sending.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        He sold two of his sexiest children, and donated 5% of the proceeds.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          Fuckin' cheapskate doesn't even tithe!

  21. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Former President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping as "brilliant" because he "runs 1.4 billion people with an iron fist."

    Donnie's authoritarian envy is strong.

    Xi, Putin, and Lil' Kim - all Donnie's heroes.

    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      The "If you don't criticize it you support it" crowd is noticeably silent.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        The TDS crowd thinks this is the only thing worth talking about.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Defending with attacks means you support Trump's praise for China's president ruling with an iron fist. No surprise.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Here is how stupid you are sarc. This quote was from his Hannity interview 6 months ago. It was criticized at the time including here. The tweet sniped one sentence, did you see the tweet handle, from that speech and pushed it as new. The entire of the discussion was regarding Trump getting China to act in his favor and him fighting the abuses of that dictator.

            Did you even bother to read the entire answer? I mean you cry like a bitch about your quotes being out of context, yet here you are.

            It was a sloppy and dumb thing to say, but it isnt as overt as you two TDS sufferers want it to be.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              Keep defending. I'd expect nothing less.

              1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                What you're doing by deliberately misrepresenting what Trump said is actually lying, you stupid fuck.

                But you're also trolling right now so you don't give a fuck.

                So fuck you, Sarcasmic.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I invoke the Trump defense: You did it first so it's ok, whatever "it" is.

                  1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    Did this make sense to you?

                  2. R Mac   1 year ago

                    How have you gotten even dumber?

                    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                      Booze.

                  3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    "I invoke the Trump defense: You did it first so it’s ok, whatever “it” is."

                    No I didn't. I said "YOU ARE LYING, SARCASMIC". Trump didn't praise Xi. Not at all. Those words were cherry-picked from the middle of a sentence where Trump was calling him evil.

                    And I know that you know that, so that means you're a liar.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      "I Learned It By Watching You!"

                    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      Wut?
                      Fucking retard.

                  4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                    How many bottles did you have prior to commenting here this morning?

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      One for every time you punched your wife.

                    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      So, zero then, and you're just like this sober?

                    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      He uses handles, not bottles.

                    4. Sevo   1 year ago

                      "He uses handles, not bottles."

                      Straws, not glasses.

                    5. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                      I kinda imagine him in an old stained wife beater, holey whitey tighteys, neck beard, drinking something that comes in a plastic bottle that he didn't even bother to remove from the brown paper bag.

              2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                You could have just said you didn't realize the facts and instead blindly pushed a democrat narrative once again. Would have saved you time.

                I just called it silly and stupid dumdum.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  The best defense is a good offence. Attack!

                  1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    Answer his charge or fuck off, troll.

                  2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    Does this make sense to anyone else?

                    The first person to attack others in the thread was shrike, and then you dumdum.

                    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      He's just trolling. He knows he was wrong so now he's just trying to shit up the thread.

            2. JesseAz   1 year ago

              I will also add you continue to care more about words than actual policy or actions. Biden openly defies the USSC and constitution and you run into here saying he at least talks like he respects it. Your continued words over actions is hilarious.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Attack, defend, attack!

                1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                  Fucking lying little troll.

                2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Sarc is in victim mode. Means he knows he looks stupid. His form of sqrsly and his tim the enchanter garbage.

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    Boo!

                    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                      Booze!

                  2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    "Sarc is in victim mode."

                    Sarc is in troll mode. He'll start playing the victim when enough people tell him to fuck off.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      I could never encroach onto Trump's domain. He is The Victim. No other victims compare.

                    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      Trump was actually victimized. You, on the other hand, whine that people are punching you back.

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Nobody likes a victim. Unless his name is Trump.

            3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

              OK, I may be ignorant here.

              1. I assumed the quote was taken out of context. This is Boehm, after all.

              2. But I don't see the full text, and apparently Twitter won't show me any responses unless I sign up with Twitter.

              3. So do you have a direct link to the full(er) text? It's always fun seeing what context has been left out.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                Here is even the right criticizing the comment with some of the fuller context. It was the Hannity interview 6 months ago, but fox seems to be paywalling shit.

                https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-calls-chinese-communist-dictator-xi-jinping-smart-brilliant

                1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                  Thanks. Yes, only partisan idiots could take that literally as praise of Xi. It's funny how the same idiots don't take it as praise of Hollywood.

              2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4fun7R5Wak&t=2034s

                There's the full interview. Trump's comments about Xi start about 33:30 in the video, but some of the context for it starts a bit earlier than that.

                I'd say it's unfocused as his tweets and his Truth Social posts, but I can certainly see the idea that he's saying, "Like him or not, he's definitely capable." That's my read on it, anyway. It's shoveled into the middle of a boast about how he got China to pay US farm subsidies.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

                  Yeah. His entire thought was build up Xi so I can show even against a smart, powerful adversary i can get concessions.

              3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                Conversation with Tucker Carlson about a state dinner with XI.

                Trump: "People ask me, how smart is Xi? Top of the line, you never met anyone smarter.
                How smart is Kim Jong Un? Top of the line.
                You know people say "Oh, this and that" but they're really smart.
                You know when you come out and as a young man at 24, 23, even though he sort of inherits it. Most people, when they inherit they lose it, and that's easy stuff. He took over a country of very smart people, very energetic people, at a very young age, and he has total dominant control. That's not easy.

                These are very smart people. Putin, very smart, now he's had probably a [unintelligible word], the whole thing is not... if he took over the whole of Ukraine, what are we going to do, because Biden is so committed to Ukraine, what happens if it's a not winnable war, you know there's people who say Ukraine can't win. Can't beat Russia. Russia right now, I'm not saying anything out of school, I read it one of our newspapers, so, you know, it's probably fake news, but maybe not. I don't think it is. Russia right now is making massive amounts of ammunition. Sounds simple, right? But they're making massive... beyond anything they've ever made before.

                We don't have any ammunition, we've given it to Ukraine. We're not prepared to fight. I rebuilt our military. New planes, new tanks, new everything.
                They've taken the military that I've rebuilt and they've given it all to Ukraine. I mean massive amounts"

                Excerpt starts at 5:30 on the video here: https://www.foxnews.com/video/6324651091112

                1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                  That's a different conversation than the one this specific quote is pulled from.

                  1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    Yes, you and Jesse had already posted it. I posted this one because it shows that Trump has talked about evil intelligence before.

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      You should see what Obama, who you praise constantly, said.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

        Wrong spot.

    3. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      By this sort of measure, so was Obama's.

      I seem to remember the pearl clutching in 2017 that Trump was going to start a nuclear war with North Korea, then he started to negotiate an end to the dispute and then he was criticized for being to chummy with Kim. The rhetorical whiplash nearly broke my neck.

      Any such claim must be taken with a large grain of salt.

    4. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    5. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      It is interesting how comments from a town hall 6 months ago suddenly became news.

      1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        Because we are treating what someone posts on the former Twitter as important to our political discourse.

        1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

          Because we are treating what someone posts on the former Twitter as important to our political discourse.

          This kind of sums up a lot of the problems with contemporary politics in a nutshell. We treat the twitter ramblings of lunatics as if they're somehow serious discourse.

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            ramblings of lunatics

            But enough about President Biden, this is about the news media.

            1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

              Who do you think is primarily to blame for treating those ramblings of (senile) lunatics as serious discourse?

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        It's all Shrike has. He's even brought up comments made, or endorsements made back in 2016 for Pete's sake. It smacks of desperation from him just to defend Joe Biden.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          It wasn't shrike. It was Eric Boehm.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            Shrike and Boehm seem to do the same in that regard. Just a couple of weeks ago Shrike was bringing up "endorsements" for Trump from 2016.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Yeah. TDS makes them all act alike.

      3. JesseAz   1 year ago

        I mean are you shocked Boehm follows anti trump accounts?

    6. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

      Was that the reason for the tariffs?

  22. Yuno Hoo   1 year ago

    The proposal also calls for "effectively shutting down the border to new entrants" if the average number of migrants per day exceeds 5,000 in a given week, The New York Times reports, or if more than 8,500 try to cross the border in a single day.

    One surmises that "effectively shutting down the border" means allowing only 8,500 to cross per day.

    Anyone else see 60 Minutes last night? The Border Patrol "does not have the authority" to close a well-known walk-through hole utilized by (at least) Chinese "entrants", so this goes on and on!

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Saw this morning. Loved CA arresting the poor immigrant defending his land and taking away his 2nd A.

      /sarc.

  23. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    I often make fun of the fact that Reason's head honcho used to work for Bill Kristol's The Weekly Standard. Here's another example of the neocon mindset that helped launch that rag:

    Of course you’re a no, you disingenuous piece of anti-Semitic filth.

    That's John Podhoretz, whose Twitter bio says he cofounded TWS, scolding Thomas Massie for explaining why he doesn't think Israel should get an additional $14 billion from the US.

    But don't you dare suggest neocons see the US as an instrument to strengthen the country they really care about! That's called the DUAL LOYALTY SMEAR. 🙁

    1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      (Oops - already covered 5 minutes ago.)

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Buttplug must be torn, because as much as he hates Jews, he is a neocon.

    3. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Classic Takes: How I Murdered The Weekly Standard!
      https://www.emerald.tv/p/classic-takes-how-i-murdered-the

  24. mtrueman   1 year ago

    "The combination of an overextended American military and Iran's inability to directly control the groups it funds means that "events are on a permanent hair trigger that is constantly threatening to explode at the slightest pressure. "

    I suggest they exploded on Oct. 7 2023. The core of the issue is the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Resolve that and much else falls easily into place. The fact that neither Reason nor the administration want to acknowledge this, preferring to yet again put Iran's control or lack of it at the center of the issue, falls right in line with American and Israeli propaganda.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "JEWS!!!!"

      1. mtrueman   1 year ago

        Israel calls itself a Jewish state. You may not want to acknowledge that any more than Reason or Biden want to acknowledge the centrality of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Your comfort zone doesn't stray from the American/Israeli propaganda narrative.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          You're too clever by half. I don't like theocracies, but you're leaving all the Muslim theocracies out of your rant.

          For a theocracy, Israel treats its non-Jews far better than any Muslim theocracy, even the "democratic" ones which do hold elections (Indonesia, Malaysia). I'll take their side in any war any day. But I don't appreciate my taxes being confiscated for the purpose.

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            "but you’re leaving all the Muslim theocracies out of your rant."

            Because the focus of the conflict is Israel and Palestine. Occupier and occupied. Muslim theocracies, whether in Afghanistan or Iran or elsewhere are irrelevant. If you want a rant where Muslim theocracies take their place front and center, go to any American or Israeli propaganda outlet.

            "Israel treats its non-Jews far better "

            This self congratulatory propaganda flies in the face of the Israeli genocide perpetrated on the people of Palestine. Read the South African indictment if you need any details. Reason and the rest of the bourgeois American media didn't see fit to mention it, so you'll have to look elsewhere.

            1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

              Occupied? Jews were there thousands of years before Mohammed came late to the game.

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "Occupied? "

                Yes, the border fences, watchtowers, armed check points, constant surveillance and control of entry and exit of people and goods to the occupied territories are the give away. I'm sure you wouldn't like to live under such circumstances, would you?

                1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                  Now explain how Jews are the occupiers when they were there first, by thousands of years.

                  1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                    C'mon, man! The issue has been raised, you have not addressed it yet!

                  2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    Any PCA chart of every Jewish community worldwide shows Bronze and Iron Age Levantine genes.

                    But somehow for mt卐uman they're the cOloNiZeRs.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "they’re the cOloNiZeRs."

                      Occupiers.

                      The Israeli installed border fences, Israeli manned watchtowers, Israeli armed check points, constant Israeli surveillance and Israeli control of entry and exit of people and goods to the occupied territories are the give away.

                      Colonizers are more of a West Bank thing where Israeli land thievery is a common practice.

                    2. Truthfulness   1 year ago (edited)

                      @mtrueman

                      There’s no “occupation” in defending oneself from those who want your existence eradicated. Neither is there any “thievery” in a land that didn’t belong to the inhabitants of the West Bank in the first place. There was never a Palestinian state!

                      You’ve been deceived.

                2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

                  Geez I wonder why Israel needs them. Could it be the constant rocket fire and sucide bombers caused them to have to build them.

                  Fucking communist piece of shit.

                  1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    "Geez I wonder why Israel needs them."

                    Because people resist military occupation and being treated as subhumans. Wouldn't you?

                    1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

                      No such "occupation" exists... if you're treated as a "subhuman", that means you broke the law and are now a war criminal. That's exactly what's happening to Hamas.

                      Let go of your blatant antisemitism.

            2. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

              "genocide perpetrated on the people of Palestine.""

              That's the propaganda.

              No talk about how Hamas and the PLO runs basically a theocracy on the Palestinian people. They have done more to oppress the Palestinian people on a daily basis. They use them for human shields. The network of tunnels under the city, under hospitals for protection as an example.

              I find it odd that people are protesting to Israel to release hostages they don't have, and not protesting the kidnappers who took and are holding them.

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                You're not informed. I urge you to widen your range of sources on the issue. Even read a book or two.

                "I find it odd..."

                Because you are only getting one side of the story. Again, I urge you to expand the frontiers of your knowledge.

                1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                  Perhaps you could suggest a book or two.

                  Perhaps you could answer the issues posted elsewhere which you haven't answered yet, in spite of your promise to address issues.

                  1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                    Don’t waste time with misconstruman

                    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                      It's kinda fun, he's so ignorant and falls into his own traps. Besides, newbies who read idiots without any response sometimes take that to mean there's no controversy. That's how wokism gets propagated in schools.

                  2. mtrueman   1 year ago (edited)

                    I really don't know which issues I'm supposed to have addressed, but failed to do so. I understand you want me to devote more time criticizing Iran and Muslims in general, but I've already explained that I believe this is a red herring and the conflict between Israel and Palestine lies at the heart of the issue.

                    “Perhaps you could suggest a book or two.”

                    Pick any book on the subject. If you find it propagandistic, drop it and choose another. I don’t have any particular books in mind, but there are also websites, podcasts etc.

                    I found this podcast quite illuminating: https://www.lrb.co.uk/podcasts-and-videos/podcasts/the-lrb-podcast/war-in-gaza

                    Less than an hour long. Please listen and post your impression here if you don’t mind.

                    1. VinniUSMC   1 year ago (edited)

                      You found Palestinian leftist, pro-Hamas propaganda illuminating? Go figure.

            3. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

              Are you aware that there's a significant Muslim minority who lives in Israel? They have the same rights as everyone else, except they're also not subjected to civil duties like military conscription. The Muslims they seem to have a problem with are the ones who are lobbing rockets at them daily.

              1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                "Apartheid"

                -mtrueman

              2. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "Are you aware that there’s a significant Muslim minority who lives in Israel?"

                Any Muslims living in the occupied territories are living under occupation, by definition, and apartheid. It's not based on skin color but whether one had the foresight to be born a Jew or not.

                1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                  Foresight? You mean foreskin?

    2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      By years end, Israel will have annihilated Hamas within Gaza.

      Then a conversation can occur.

      1. mtrueman   1 year ago

        "Then a conversation can occur."

        There are conversations occurring at the moment. In Paris, between the US, Palestine, Israel and Arab neighbors. Try to keep up.

        And think about it, if Hamas were eliminated, with whom are you expecting the Israelis converse? Hamas is the organized resistance to Israeli occupation. With that gone, Israel could simply dictate their terms without needing to converse with anyone. You're committing the same error that others here follow when they claim that the conflict would be resolved simply by Hamas laying down their arms and surrendering to Israel. That would solve none of the underlying problems - apartheid and occupation.

        1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

          That would solve none of the underlying problems – apartheid and occupation.

          The narrative must've changed over the weekend. I see "literal genocide" is now omitted.

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            "I see “literal genocide” is now omitted."

            An astute observation. Allow me to respond.

            Because even if the genocide were stopped, the underlying problems, apartheid and occupation, would presumably continue. They were the underlying problems on Oct. 6 last year, Oct. 7, and still are today. Any permanent settlement will of course have to put an end to Israel's genocidal practices, but, more fundamentally, it will have to address apartheid and occupation.

            1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

              Q. Are you really so dumb that you believe all that you parrot?

              A. Irrelevant. Obedience does not require understanding.

              Q. Are you really so dumb that you think anyone believes that you believe that shit?

              A. Irrelevant. Obedience does not require understanding.

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "Q. Are you really so dumb that you believe all that you parrot?"

                I'm not that dumb and I'm not that smart. I am skeptical of government propaganda, and like to seek out alternative view points. That's all.

                If you'd like to address any specific issues, I'd be happy too.

                1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                  Oh, so you believe Muslim propaganda because it's not from the government, it's from the one true prophet and his followers.

                  Probably the same logic applies to Hitler. It wasn't government propaganda, it was party propaganda, and thus free of taint.

                  And by extension, Democrat propaganda is fine, not being government.

                  1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    "Oh, so you believe Muslim propaganda because it’s not from the government, it’s from the one true prophet and his followers."

                    I believe in the facts, as best as I can discern them. I recommend you try to do the same.

                2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                  Here's a specific issue you've dodged so far: How can Israel be the occupier when they were there thousands of years before the Muslims?

                  1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    " How can Israel be the occupier "

                    I did address the issue, though inadequately, I confess. Originally I wrote:
                    "Yes, the border fences, watchtowers, armed check points, constant surveillance and control of entry and exit of people and goods to the occupied territories are the give away."

                    For your benefit, I will amend that to:

                    Yes, the Israeli installed border fences, Israeli manned watchtowers, Israeli armed check points, constant Israeli surveillance and Israeli control of entry and exit of people and goods to the occupied territories are the give away.

                    It's not Palestinian installed border fences, or Palestinian manned watchtowers etc. That how we know that it's Israelis = occupier and Palestinians = occupied, and not the other way round.

                    I don't see the relevance of who lived there 1000s of years ago. The border fences, surveillance towers, and military check points are a feature of life today in the occupied territories.

                    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                      It doesn't matter who was there first?

                      How can the late arrival not be the invader? How can the first arrival not have the right to be there and to defend its turf when invaders show up?

                      Are you now justifying Columbus and all those icky Europeans arriving in the Americas?

                  2. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    "It doesn’t matter who was there first?"

                    Exactly.

                    "How can the late arrival not be the invader? "

                    In different ways. Think about it and get back to me.

                    "Are you now justifying Columbus and all those icky Europeans arriving in the Americas?"

                    Are you? Again, think about it and get back to me. Or don't. I suspect you've nothing interesting to add once you've exhausted the cue card supply of stock propaganda.

                  3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                    This seems to be the new direction of the leftists. I've already mentioned reading an article by a historical journalist who implied that the Spanish reconquering Al Andulus in the 15th century were invaders, not the Muslim Caliphates that invaded in the 8th century. We've also seen it with how they will condemn the Crusades. I had one idiot try arguing that the Muslims were the native people of the Levant and there conquest of the Levant and North Africa was just them reclaiming a Muslim Homeland (he actually thought Islam predated Christianity, he called Christianity the come lately religion, he also implied Islam predates Judaism). He didn't believe me that the Ottomans invaded Europe, and drove all the way to Vienna. It's because they get taught history in a vacuum. Often by ideologues who take a single event out of context to push their anti-western hatred. But these so called educated leftists are not blameless, since they're so incurious that they don't do their own research. Which is even more unforgivable in this day and age. Amazon has tens of thousands of non-fiction historical works available on Kindle, many are even free or extremely cheap ($26 or less), that you can download and read at your leisure and that you never need to return. In the past month I've read a narrative history of the Battle of Chickamauga, an analysis of the military history of the German Speaking peoples from the 16th century till present, that looked at the evolution, socioeconomic impact and development, an analytical narrative history of the Franco Prussian War, another on Stuart England, and am currently reading another on Tudor England and one on the evolution of the Viking World, that doesn't end in 1066 but continues into the 13th century and looks at the interactions from Baghdad to the shores of North America.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      Not one mention of Iran in the whole diatribe. If you want to be in keeping with contemporary American/Israeli propaganda, you need to bump up your anti-Iran ranting. Don't know where to start? Pick a writer from Reason and follow their lead. One's as good as the next.

                      I'll give you a start. Instead of "the evolution of the Viking World" how about trying "the evolution of the Iran-backed Viking World. " Make Biden proud.

                    2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                      Unmuted the retarded Nazi and surprise surprise his reply was an insane as I predicted it would be. Where is Robert Downey Jr pretending to be a black man when you need him?

                    3. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      Please, 'Iran-backed Robert Downey Jr.' is much more in keeping with the parlance of the times.

                    4. Truthfulness   1 year ago

                      @mtrueman

                      Yet you endorse Iran's actions.

                3. Zeb   1 year ago

                  mtrueman is the perfect illustration of the "midwit" idea.

                4. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                  "I’m not that dumb and I’m not that smart."

                  Well, you're half right.

        2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          Try addressing all the Muslim horrors before dumping on Israel. Think you could try being just a little bit less like Misek?

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            "Try addressing all the Muslim horrors before dumping on Israel."

            Again, if you want to be told that Iran is the root of all evil, and that Hamas is merely their puppet on a string, turn to any mainstream American propaganda outlet, or anything from Biden and his minions. They'll rant on about Muslim horrors for you till the cows come home. I'm focusing on the reality of the situation.

            1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

              You're focusing on being as well-loved as Misek.

              Who put you in charge of conversations? What makes you think you control what gets discussed when it comes to Muslim genocide vs Israel survival?

              You're just a run-of-the-mill garden variety anti-semite. They funny thing is, if you were to try to survive in any Muslim country, you wouldn't last 5 minutes. You are the epitome of a useful tool, except you aren't really very useful.

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "Who put you in charge of conversations? "

                It seems to have fallen on me by default. Anybody else here is relying on cue cards supplied to them by the likes of the Biden administration and the Israeli propagandists. You doubt me? Read the comments carefully, and you'll see that I'm the only one questioning that narrative. Everyone else is following it lock step. You're very lucky that I'm in charge of the conversation.

                "You’re just a run-of-the-mill garden variety anti-semite. "

                I've never denied or hidden my opposition to Israel, her policies or leadership. Again, you're very lucky to have such a honest and forthright leader of the conversation.

            2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

              And speaking of reality, how about Hamas's avowed intention of wiping Israel from the map and Jews from the planet? Is that genocidey enough for you?

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "how about Hamas’s avowed intention of wiping Israel "

                Do you have a cite for that? I suspect you are again parroting propaganda to justify the status quo and forestall any attempt at solving the problem.

                "Is that genocidey enough for you?"

                It isn't. Actions speak much louder than words when it comes to genocide.

                1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                  October 7 didn't speak loudly enough?

                  1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    "October 7 didn’t speak loudly enough?"

                    You think Oct. 7 was any attempt to murder every Jew on the planet? You really need to expand your sources.

                    And cite for your claim "about Hamas’s avowed intention of wiping Israel from the map and Jews from the planet?" Can expect it soon, today, perhaps?

                    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago (edited)

                      By that logic, you really think Israel’s current military operation is an attempt to murder every Muslim on the planet? Can expect it soon, today, perhaps?

                    2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago (edited)

                      You think Oct. 7 was any attempt to murder every Jew on the planet?

                      Imagine Hamas had access to two buttons, one that killed every Jew in Israel, and one that killed every Jew everywhere. Do they press neither of those buttons? Or do they press the one that kills all the Jews?

                    3. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "By that logic, "

                      The logic is yours. You state the goal of Hamas is to murder every Jew in the world. I've already stated this is merely propaganda to forestall any change to the status quo. Sorry if that isn't clear enough. I suspect it's that you don't want to understand my point, rather than you can't. It's not complicated after all.

                    4. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "Imagine Hamas had access to two buttons,"

                      Why would Israel let Hamas have such access to such horrible buttons? Surely they would realize the danger of such a situation and keep the buttons to themselves.

                    5. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                      Mtrueman, how would you feel if you had missed breakfast yesterday?

                    6. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      I have an excuse. Hamas pressed the lunch button, maybe they'll hit the breakfast button tomorrow.

                    7. Truthfulness   1 year ago

                      @mtrueman

                      Thanks for telling us that you're in good company with Hamas. Enjoy that Dagga!

                2. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

                  It is in their charter…

                  Their leadership openly declares it.

                3. Sevo   1 year ago

                  Yes, I have a cite and there are many more which antisemite assholes like you will choose to ignore:
                  "Hamas terror group’s charter explicitly calls for Israel’s destruction: ‘Fight and kill them’"

                  Jehttps://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/05/hamas-terror-groups-charter-explicitly-calls-for-israels-destruction-fight-jews-and-kill-them/ws

        3. Zeb   1 year ago

          Palestinians as a whole can choose leaders whose goal isn't to utterly destroy Israel and pretty quickly stop being occupied if they choose to. Or they can keep supporting Hamas or other similar groups and keep attacking Israel and then getting their asses kicked. I'm not endorsing the situation, but that's reality.

        4. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

          misconstrueman, the only things to negotiate with Hamas are the size of their burial shroud, and how deep they want to be buried. There is nothing to negotiate.

          Hamas is Amalek. The behavior and actions of Hamas show them to be human animals. Helpfully, Hamas posted their savagery on social media. This makes the call much easier: Hamas will be annihilated.

          As for the arabs that remain, their best option for survival is to obey the directives of the IDF. For many of them, incentivized emigration will be their lifeline, and a way out to a better life.

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            "misconstrueman, the only things to negotiate with Hamas are the size of their burial shroud, and how deep they want to be buried. There is nothing to negotiate. "

            Sorry to inform you, and Reason is party to blame for this, but Hamas is in Paris at the moment negotiating a hostage exchange with Israel, even if it's only indirectly. They did much the same thing already in Doha last November before the previous hostage exchange. You disapprove, I understand, but I'm just reporting the facts. Check your sources if you doubt me.

            "As for the arabs that remain,"

            They would fear the massacre that awaits them. Sabra and Chatila in 1983, look it up. PLO leadership and militants were persuaded to vacate Lebanon for Tunis. Shortly after, Arabs remaining in the above mentioned camps in Lebanon were massacred in their thousands. Never again.

            "This makes the call much easier: Hamas will be annihilated."

            Are you running for office in Israel? Save it for the rubes.

            1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

              misconstrueman, Hamas rejected a hostage deal. Suits me. They'll die just a little faster now as they are hunted down like human animals. Only another 10K to 15K Hamas members to go. 🙂

              You've reported your opinion. It is drek. I had to correct your insurrectal* argument.

              *Insurrectual = pulled it out of your ass

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "Hamas rejected a hostage deal."

                A deal won't be concluded until both sides agree to it. Just like what happened in November last year. If only one side agrees, the deal won't go through. Disappointing as that may be, it's the way things work.

                1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

                  misconstrueman, as I indicated. Aside from the size of the burial shroud to use, there is nothing to negotiate with lying, Judeocidal terrorists.

                  It really won't matter misconstrueman, since Israel will never leave Gaza. I hear the beaches at Gush Katif might be re-opening next year. That was the talk of the town (in Jerusalem just last weekend).

                  1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    "there is nothing to negotiate with lying"

                    Good lord, man, how many times must you be told? There are negotiations taking place now in Paris. The hundred or so Israelis released last November were also a result of negotiations between Hamas and Israel. The deal made a few years back which saw over 1000 Palestinian hostages exchanged for one Israel occupation force soldier was another, negotiated between Bibi and, you guessed it, Hamas. You are far too emotional to discuss this rationally with me. Find someone who's not antisemitic, and give them a try. I feel I'm wasting your time.

                    "I hear the beaches at Gush Katif might be re-opening next year."

                    As Jew only beaches? I don't qualify.

    3. Mickey Rat   1 year ago (edited)

      Of course, resolving the sides where one wants Isrsel to continue to exist and the other side wants the Jews pushed into the Med, i.e. Israel destroyed and the land ethnically cleansed of Jews is a bit more difficult in practice

      1. mtrueman   1 year ago

        I think a solution lies in both sides compromising. The best I can offer is that Israel (as a Jewish state) will cease to exist, while Jews and Palestinians commingle together in one state as equals.

        "Israel destroyed and the land ethnically cleansed of Jews is a bit more difficult in practice"

        I don't think that outcome is in the cards. It seems to be a propaganda point to defend the status quo. Don't fall for it.

        1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

          The propaganda point that is openly stated constantly by the Pro-Palestinuan side? It does not matter if it is a likely outcome, it matters if they will not accept anything less.

          Islamists do not seek to have non-Muslims be equal to them. They seek supremacy.

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            "Islamists do not seek to have non-Muslims be equal to them. "

            This is why compromise is essential to any negotiated settlement. Neither side, quite rightfully, should accept any solution where one side claims superiority over the other. You seem to agree, though are not willing to state as much. Is that correct?

            1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

              Great, now why don't you trot on to some Hamas forums and tell them to compromise.

              Post a link when you've done that homework.

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "Great, now why don’t you trot on to some Hamas forums and tell them to compromise."

                I've already mentioned that Hamas leaders are in negotiations already with counterparts of Israel, America, and other Arab nations. I put some thought into my comments. You would do well to read them before responding.

                1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                  Wait -- what was that?

                  with counterparts of Israel, America, and other Arab nations.

                  Are you saying Israel is negotiating? At the same time Israel is not negotiating?

                  I guess that goes right along with "other Arab nations", which implies you think (1) Hamas is a nation, (2) you don't know the difference between "Arab" and "Muslim" since you leave out Iran.

                  How much thought did you put into that comment?

                  1. Sevo   1 year ago

                    As much "thought" as antisemite asshole puts in any post:

                    mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
                    "Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."

                  2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    Keep in mind you're talking to someone who thinks Hermann Goering is worthy of a Shakespearean tragedy.

                    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      More like a Falstaffian figure from a comedy. Falstaff was a comic figure. Shakespeare would have Goering pursuing his own self indulgent ends, ignoring Nazi dogma when it suits him, and bungling any assignments he was given. I look forward to your thoughts on how Shakespeare would have treated your favorite Nazi. Himmler, wasn't it?

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                      For anyone thinking mtrueman is a serious person, see immediately above.

                    3. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

                      misconstrueman sounds like some seriously twisted fuck.

                  3. mtrueman   1 year ago

                    "Are you saying Israel is negotiating? "

                    No, it's only what I read in the press outside Reason. Israeli negotiators are in Paris talking with counterparts from Hamas, America, Qatar, etc. Search the net if you don't believe me.

                    "(2) you don’t know the difference between “Arab” and “Muslim” since you leave out Iran."

                    An Arab is a native speaker of Arabic, and a Muslim is a follower of Islam, and I don't believe Iranians are part of the talks in Paris.

                    "(1) Hamas is a nation,"

                    Hamas is a political party in Palestine, an offshoot of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood. Hamas is representing the Palestinians in the Paris talks. Whether the Palestinians are a nation or not is another issue. They have their own unique flag which they rally around, so that's one indication of their nationhood, but to answer your question, Hamas is not a nation, and I don't believe anyone is making that claim.

                    "How much thought did you put into that comment?"

                    Evidently more than you put into yours. If you have anything but inane and tiresome nipping at my heels to offer, you'd make me happier than a traveling lad.

                    1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

                      misconstrueman, Hamas is a political party like ISIS is a political party. In fact, Hamas and ISIS, Judeocidal terror groups, share the same goals. There is nothing to negotiate with a nihilistic Judeocidal terror group.

                    2. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      "There is nothing to negotiate with a nihilistic Judeocidal terror group."

                      Hamas has negotiated with Israel in the past, they're both negotiating now, and will continue negotiating into the future. Whoever is telling you otherwise is lying. You really need to expand the range of sources you're relying on for information about the region. It's shockingly limited.

                    3. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

                      misconstrueman, there is nothing to negotiate with a Judeocidal terror group. If Hamas would like a pause so that they can release Israeli and American hostages and dead hostage bodies, that might be accommodated. However, Hamas has violated and broken every agreement they made with Israel. They cannot be trusted.

                      So there really isn't anything to negotiate with Hamas, a group of lying Judeocidal terrorists. Burial shroud size can be negotiated.

                    4. mtrueman   1 year ago

                      " there is nothing to negotiate"

                      I keep telling you there are negotiations taking place in Paris. Between Hamas and Israelis with others acting as intermediaries. I understand you don't approve, but facts are facts. Those who told you otherwise are playing you for a fool. You're lucky to have me here to set you straight.

                2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  The Hamas leaders that just said no to a negotiated cease fire?

            2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

              Hamas's charter specifically disavows negotiation, just as it specifically calls for the killing of jews.

              trueman knows all this, he has been presented with it before. He doesn't care. He is here to spout (anti-semitic) nonsense as an end in itself.

              1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                "Hamas’s charter specifically disavows negotiation, just as it specifically calls for the killing of jews. "

                But somehow you can't bring yourself to cite this mysterious document. You can cut and paste, I don't mind.

                1. Sevo   1 year ago

                  Jehttps://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/05/hamas-terror-groups-charter-explicitly-calls-for-israels-destruction-fight-jews-and-kill-them/ws

                  Shit-stain here has me on mute, probably since I caught him thusly and continued to him.
                  mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
                  "Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."

                  But if anyone else who wastes time on the slimy pile of Nazi shit wishes; there's a cite.

                  1. Sevo   1 year ago

                    *...continue to remind him.*

        2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          How is Israel supposed to compromise with genocide?

          1. mtrueman   1 year ago

            Compromise is a matter of give and take. Best achieved through negotiated settlement.

            1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

              And when Hamas doesn't negotiate?

              1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                Yet another issue not addressed in spite of your promise.

                1. mtrueman   1 year ago

                  I'm not sure what you mean. Can you be more specific? What issue is it that you want me to address.

                  I believe that your concern that Israel will agree to a settlement with the Palestinians whereby all of Israel's Jews are to be driven into the sea is misplaced, disingenuous and will never happen. It amounts to a pretext to forestall any changes to the status quo. I don't know if that's the issue you wanted me to address, but without more clarity from you, that'll have to do for now.

                  1. Sevo   1 year ago

                    "I’m not sure what you mean..."

                    Pick one, shit-stain.
                    You never provide support for your bullshit and you never post anything but bullshit.

          2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

            Israel will only let Hamas and Hezbollah murder half of the Israeli Jewish population.

            There are some situations where you cannot find an acceptable middle position that ends a conflict permanently.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              To antisemites, facts like that are irrelevant.

        3. Sevo   1 year ago

          Hey, antisemitic shit-pile, Stormfront’s over there >.

        4. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

          misconstrueman, there is nothing to compromise with Hamas. Hamas has sworn to kill all Jews. It is in their charter. They have publicly stated that the destruction of Israel and the killing of all Jews remains their goal.

          There is nothing to negotiate with Judeocidal terrorists.

    4. Sevo   1 year ago

      Hey, antisemitic asshole, Stormfront's over there >.

    5. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      misconstrueman: The core of the conflict is anti-semitism; the oldest hatred.

  25. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    Oglala Sioux chief, Star Comes Out, has enforced his tribes borders against Kristi Noem for advocating for border enforcement in America.

    Life is too funny.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      I guess borders actually mean something, (sometimes).

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Shit, if anything, he's doing Noem a favor by keeping her out of that hive of alcoholism and child sexual abuse.

    3. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Noem should just enforce the US borders surrounding the Rez.

    4. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      "I bet you wish your ancestors had done a better job of border control."

  26. Jerry B.   1 year ago

    Weren't we supposed to wait for Trump to start WWIII?

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      Trump started WW4,5,6 and 7.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        WW appellations only apply when an orange man is in office.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          WW only applies when Trump attempts to lower tensions between two countries; hence WW3 (or4) with North Korea.

  27. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Ann Coulter: Best Thing Trump Could Do for America Is ‘Die’
    .
    The one-time MAGA supporter became a born-again anti-Trumper in recent years, admitting she was “a very stupid girl” to support Trump in the early days of his ascendance.

    Trump fatigue is setting in the GOP.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/ann-coulter-best-thing-trump-could-do-for-america-is-die?ref=home

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      “Trump won’t close the border. He’ll push for amnesty, allow anchor babies and sanctuary cities to continue, ban bump stocks, propose taking guns away without due process and hire half of Goldman Sacks,” she wrote Saturday on X, misspelling the name of the investment giant. “The presidential election is worthless. Concentrate on the House & Senate.”

      Ann gets it.

      I can't understand how Donnie's Cult has grown larger with each of his failures.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      2. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

        "I can’t understand how Donnie’s Cult has grown larger with each of his failures."

        What's hard for you to understand? #DefendTrumpAtAllCosts is the mirror image of your approach to Biden.

        You spent 2022 gaslighting in defense of this economy.

        You pretended inflation was a fake issue. Which even (D) leadership admits is nonsense since they called their economic agenda the "Inflation Reduction" Act.

        You spent weeks defending Biden's humiliating Afghanistan exit. And when you realized it really did damage his poll numbers, you decided bodies falling from planes was a big deal after all - but it was actually Trump's fault.

        You push Biden is kicking Putin's ass! nonsense. Which looks especially ridiculous now that we know Putin didn't try invading Ukraine from '17 to '20, and only invaded after Biden took over (and botched Afghanistan).

        tl;dr - You constantly cheerlead for a pathetic failure of a President with a 38% approval rating.

        #ZeroSelfAwareness

      3. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

        Lol "if you like Trump over Nikki Haley you're in a cult" says the former Obama cultist.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      .. a very stupid girl….

      Uh huh.

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

      For TDS sufferers the only thing that matters is anti trump statements. See shrike loving Bill kristol, neocons and now Coulter lol.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Why do so many conservatives hate Donnie?

        Dubya was beloved by conservatives. You all rallied support for him during all eight years of his presidency. It was only later that you admitted what a failure he was.

        But Trump is hated by about 15% of conservatives.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd certainly is dishonest, but he’s got a heaping helping of stupid to go with his dishonesty. Stupid, lying, despicable steaming pile of lefty shit and proud to be!

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Yeah, but you only hated him because you're a Democrat. That's why you shill for Soros, who's also a Democrat and funds Democrat causes.

        3. JesseAz   1 year ago

          You think neocons speak for conservatives despite being a minority of the current party.

  28. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    "The proposal also calls for "effectively shutting down the border to new entrants" if the average number of migrants per day exceeds 5,000 in a given week . . . "

    So we can, in fact, shut down the border?
    Then why not "just do it"?

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      8000 x 365 = 2,920,000

      Even more than before.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        The 5k was always the weekly average. 8500 was daily.

        But this limit is meaningless because it doesn't force Biden to even shut down the border. Meaningless restriction.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          That’s what I’m saying.

  29. Uncle Jay   1 year ago

    An endless war is what the fascist filth from both parties want for the US.
    It gives them and their cronies tons of money, a great way to launder their ill gotten gains, and it reduces the excess population, and it proves once again their manual on governing the masses, "1984," can not be disputed.

  30. Sevo   1 year ago

    "Judge 'shocked' by efforts to 'rewrite history' of Jan. 6 attack, those who label perpetrators 'hostages'
    The "rhetoric could presage further danger to our country," the judge wrote."
    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/judge-shocked-efforts-rewrite-history-jan-6-attack/story?id=106705677

    1) Don't ever let facts change the understanding regarding a hysterical over-reaction to a minor event.
    2) The narrative is of prime importance; change the narrative and people might act in ways I don't like.

    One of Reagan's mistakes; an advanced case of TDS in robes.

    1. Zeb   1 year ago

      And I'm still shocked at how a protest that got out of hand has been spun as some kind of act of war. Always amazes me to encounter people who actually believe the "insurrection" narrative.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        Further, the claim is 'they were going to stop the exchange of power!!!!!"
        I've asked several meatheads how, in detail, did they think that was to be accomplished? Was "power" gift-wrapped in a package and were the protesters to steal it before it was handed to droolin' Joe to open?
        Mentioned before: The protesters had as much ability to 'stop the exchange of power' as they had of levitating the capitol.

      2. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        Nobody believes it. It's just the excuse. Like the Communist Chinese Virus.
        Anything to advance the fascist cause.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          I think some people believe it. They tend to be completely uninterested in the actual facts, but they still believe it.

  31. Sevo   1 year ago

    "Monster Pacific storm to 'firehose' California with rain, flooding and wind"

    1) CA is just shy of 3" above seasonal normal for this date (at~15") while last year CS had already gotten nearly the yearly total of 23".
    2) The Chron headlined the weather with the 'reporter' claiming "hurricane winds had never been forecast in CA!!!!", and then quoted a meteorologist who stated "These were the strongest wend we've had so far this year" (being barely February).
    See what happens when you change the narrative? Sid-down and shud-up; it was a rainstorm. They happen.

    1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      no no no y ou have it all wrong.

      We are on the verge of a 100 years drought and we're all gonna die of thirst here soon.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        It would not take a lot of searching to find that failed Jesuit Moonbeam standing at a podium in a barren 'snow-field' about this time some 4 years back predicting we were 'never again going to see normal rain fall'!
        This is a guy who was CA Gov in the '70s and again in the teens and did ZERO to increase CA's ability to harvest rain-water.
        Summbitch has a closet full of hair shirts, and thinks you should, too.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          "California Braces for Unending Drought"
          [...]
          "May 9, 2016
          LOS ANGELES — With California entering its fifth year of a statewide drought, Gov. Jerry Brown moved on Monday to impose permanent water conservation measures and called on water suppliers to prepare for a future made drier by climate change.
          Under the governor’s executive order, emergency drought regulations, like bans on hosing down driveways or watering lawns within 48 hours of a rainstorm, will remain indefinitely. Urban water suppliers will be required to report their water use to the state each month and develop plans to get through long-term periods of drought..."
          https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/us/california-drought-water-restrictions-permanent.html

          Note this is from that bastion of right-wing politics NYT.

    2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      More than 800,000 without power in California

      So... the homeless population? I'm not sure that's a result of the rain, guys.

  32. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

    Random thought experiment: Predict who will run for President in 2028. 2024 is just a rematch, so who's likely to be running 4 years from now? Who do both sides have with any sway?

    On the Republican side, pretty sure DeSantis will run again. Vivek probably runs again. I think Nikki Haley has taken her shot and she's not going to be relevant in 4 years. Ted Cruz could try for another presidential run. Greg Abbot might consider it, but he's going to be 71 in 2028, so I don't expect him to gain any momentum. If I really had to put money on a nominee, I'd probably say Desantis at this point.

    On the Democrat side, I have no freaking clue who they've got. Kamala Harris wants to run but nobody wants her. Most conceivable people are too old. Best I can guess is that Michelle Obama might jump in and get the Obama cult vote. Maybe Newsome tries his hand. I can't think of who else is properly situated for Democrats and high-enough profile to really make a run of it. They might just come out of the woodworks in 2028, though. But if she's interested in running, it's hard to bet against Michelle Obama getting the nod, she's got way too many people who will fawn over everything she does.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      Why do wingnuts push this Michelle Obama running for POTUS notion? She has said she hates politics and would never run for any office.

      Newsom vs Donald J Trump in 2028. Donnie will never quit.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd will never quit lying and never recover from how Trump broke him. turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
        turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      Newsom has already run. Remember that trip to China? Nobody else does either and on his return, he sent out a p.r. claiming he was going to 'continue to build momentum!'
      Even in CA, he's seen as an empty suit. At the APEC conference in SF (11/23) they wouldn't give him the podium to welcome the attendees, and in recognition of the depth of his knowledge and importance, made him chair of "Thailand's Jungle Fauna" or some such.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        Also, CA's governor elections are off by two years, so Newsom will have been out of office and out of the public eye for too long. I can't imagine him trying to run for two years. He'd wear out his welcome too fast.

        1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

          I can’t imagine him trying to run for two years. He’d wear out his welcome too fast.

          Familiarity breeds contempt, and he's the type of shit weasel who can cause a lot of contempt in people the more they see/ hear him and the more familiar with him they become.

          1. Sevo   1 year ago

            As noted above, even in CA if he isn't held in contempt, he's seen as irrelevant. Why he thinks the US population would be different can only be attributed to the bubble he lives in.

            1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

              He's popular with democrats who live outside of California, or at least that's my perception.

              1. Sevo   1 year ago

                From what's reported in the Chron (lap-dog Newsom rag), his attempt at getting support beyond the CA borders ('building momentum!") went up the flag-pole and everybody remained at parade rest.
                One day coverage, back to page 10, below the fold.

          2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

            Its hard to see the guy and not think of the slimiest used car salesman ive ever met. He just oozes it

            1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago (edited)

              He reminds me of Patrick Bateman, Christian Bale’s character in American Psycho.

    3. Zeb   1 year ago

      Maybe Desantis will figure out how to campaign nationally. He seems like he wouldn't be completely awful.

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        I don't think DeSantis really wanted to run.
        Not sure he wants to be president.

    4. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      I think they are trying to make Hakeem Jeffries a thing. Newsome absolutely will want a shot at it, I have no dount about that. Buttgag will probably keep pursuing it though he might have absolutely handicapped himself with gross incompetence (then again, democrat). I really cant imagine Kamala will run. Her narcissism will make her want it, but someone will pull her aside and give it to her straight at some point, shes a guaranteed L.
      Beto again? Whitmer?

      I bet Desantis returns to Fl and happily continues on there and makes another run at it in 28. Could also see Vivek trying again, he's got lots of money and lots of time left. Dunno if Kemp will try his hand.

      Desantis ran such a shit campaign, but honestly in terms of governance he might be the best for the job. Governing the country how he has in Fl would be fine with me, certainly a 10000% improvement from Biden and his DEI regime

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        Kemp is absolute dogshit.
        Pure swamp.
        So yea, maybe he'll run.

    5. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Democrats are going to be Newsom, Pritzker, Buttigieg, and Whitmer, with maybe Katie Hobbs and Jared Polis as the "moderate" alternatives. Newsom will win in a cakewalk because the party at large is controlled by Californians, although Polis will make a contest out of it because Colorado is East California now, he's gay, and he's slightly less stupid than his mainstream party counterparts, as his time in the governor's seat has shown with him not acting as a total rubber-stamp for the Democrat retards in the state legislature.

    6. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago (edited)

      Republicans are going to be entirely dependent on if Trump runs, yet again (no, he’s not winning, no matter what the polls might say. Learn your lessons from 2020). If not, I think we’re looking at DeSantis, Dan Crenshaw, Joe Lombardo, Brian Kemp, Glenn Youngkin, and Kim Reynolds, with Liz Cheney trying a Hail Mary to take control of the party back for the neocons before finally crossing over to the Democrats for good. I think Rand Paul will try and run again, but he’ll be jonesing for a cabinet seat because everyone else will be mad that he challenged St. Fauci.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        One thing that I've noticed the last few weeks is Biden's support numbers in Nevada versus Arizona--they're far worse in the former than in the latter.

        I think this is reflecting the actual shift in voter demographics following the deaths of McCain and Reid, and subsequently the decline of their political machines in those states to actually drive voter numbers for their party.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Oh, and J.D. Vance might be a wild card entry, depending on how much he likes being in the Senate and if he even harbors those ambitions.

        1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

          Not sure if Vance has been a bit too poisoned for the Republic base. I can't even say what the GOP voting base is going to look like in 4 years, though. The older institutionalist conservatives are losing their grip on the rank-and-file who are increasingly anti-institutions.

    7. BYODB   1 year ago

      Honestly that sounds about right to me except the part where Michelle Obama probably doesn't want to be President. The Obama's are enjoying their wealth at this point and mostly staying out of the spotlight.

      They pop up here and there, but not much mention of either of them in any news I've read in the past 8 years.

      Not saying you're wrong or anything, merely that it seems unlikely that she has much interest in being Hillary Clinton 2.0. Frankly, she'd almost certainly do better than Hillary but that's a pretty low bar at this point.

      Otherwise, yeah, who can the Democrats field for President after Biden? It's a short list, and none of them seem like they much represent the Democrat party in 2028. Most, at best, represent the Democrat party of circa 2000; almost 30 years ago. The younger Democrats better represent the party of today, but are also near unelectable due to their overt communist tendencies.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Yeah, we've been hearing this shit about Michelle running for a while, and the problem is that everyone knows who'd actually be in charge of the place if she did do it. She's gone on record saying how frustrated she was with Barack's political ambitions and how much their marriage actually suffered for about a decade because of it--I highly doubt she wants to jump in those waters again just to be a proxy for her husband. She's also shown nowhere near the political thirst-mongering that Hillary was famous for--she was really just a bog-standard First Lady who benefitted from the media having their tongue up her asshole for all these years.

        1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

          I guess I don't really know much about her personally, just that I hear from a lot of mainstream people how much they wish she'd run. If she wants to hang it up and stay out of politics, good for her (though she's certainly not shy about staying in the public eye).

          I just don't know who has such broad popularity with the Democratic base that they'd ben an obvious candidate. They've absorbed socialists into the party, so it's tough to figure out where the actual center of the party is because the far left is pulling hard to left, and not all democrats are really thrilled about the socialism and identity politics. The more moderates are just hanging with Democrats because they've been convinced the other side are all racists and bigots. They're going to have to figure out where the national party really exists once they get beyond Biden, who is so bland people can just project onto him whatever policies they hope he'll pursue.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            I guess I don’t really know much about her personally, just that I hear from a lot of mainstream people how much they wish she’d run. If she wants to hang it up and stay out of politics, good for her (though she’s certainly not shy about staying in the public eye).

            That's just typical lefty/Oprah/The Secret "speak your desires into reality" wishcasting. It's like teenage girls wishing Gwen Stefani or Taylor Swift would run for President.

            Michelle's certainly not dumb, and she had a front-row seat to what the office did to Obama physically in 8 years. She obviously enjoys being in the public eye, albeit in the same way Al Gore did in the 2000s where everyone was begging him to run for President again, but he was having far too easy of a life with this climate grift and thus had no motivation to seek office again. Becoming President would have actually been a step down for him, and for her it's just taking on world-impacting responsiblities that she's never shown any inclination to actually pursue.

    8. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago (edited)

      On the Republican side, pretty sure DeSantis will run again. Vivek probably runs again. I think Nikki Haley has taken her shot and she’s not going to be relevant in 4 years. Ted Cruz could try for another presidential run. Greg Abbot might consider it, but he’s going to be 71 in 2028, so I don’t expect him to gain any momentum. If I really had to put money on a nominee, I’d probably say Desantis at this point.

      I could maybe see Tim Scott running again, especially if he’s a high profile member of the Trump admin (assuming Trump wins). I could also see maybe Marco Rubio trying to capture the milquetoast/ neo-con/ centrist/ establishment toady GOP vote. But I also see the nomination most likely going to DeSantis or whoever Trump’s VP is (again, assuming he wins this year). Although I could also see a surprise scenario where Vivek channels his inner Trump and captures the "MAGA" vote. Especially if Trump doesn't win this year.

      On the Democrat side, I have no freaking clue who they’ve got. Kamala Harris wants to run but nobody wants her. Most conceivable people are too old. Best I can guess is that Michelle Obama might jump in and get the Obama cult vote. Maybe Newsome tries his hand. I can’t think of who else is properly situated for Democrats and high-enough profile to really make a run of it. They might just come out of the woodworks in 2028, though. But if she’s interested in running, it’s hard to bet against Michelle Obama getting the nod, she’s got way too many people who will fawn over everything she does.

      I think the only way Harris gets the nod is if Biden wins reelection, croaks halfway through his term, and she manages to somehow not totally fuck everything up. Agree with you again that if M. Obama runs, she’ll run away with the nomination, and might select Newsome as her VP. I threw up in my mouth as I typed that, FYI.

      In addition to those you mentioned, I think AOC should take a run at it, just for the lulz. Might as well just go nuts with it.

    9. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      we will naturalize Milei, add an amendment, and put him in. It's our only hope at this point.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        add an amendment

        Only problem with adding an amendment to allow for naturalized citizens to run is that also opens the door for Schwarzenegger to run as well.

        Although I'd be all for Milei as POTUS.

    10. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Don't ignore Michelle's greatest accomplishment.
      https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1753877659120021683

    11. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      I just don't know if Michelle is dumb enough to want the job. They're already rich, they already get to influence the policies behind the scene, why bother with the hassle of all that extra grey hair it's going to cause?

  33. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    Former President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping as "brilliant" because he "runs 1.4 billion people with an iron fist."

    Because I didn't believe a fucking word of this, and this would be the 9,765th time that Reason hasn't quoted the original statement, but instead repeated a contextual statement repeated by someone else in a game of Retard-Telephone, I decided to go to the original quip. Even in the Republicans Against Trump brief cut segment, it seems clear that Trump is talking about Xi as if he comes out of Hollywood Central Casting as a supervillain.

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      "He said Nazis were very fine people!! How can you possibly support him?!?!?!"

      1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

        I've literally heard this multiple times from the NPR crowd around me. Unreal how ignorant these self-professed "news junkies" really are.

        1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

          I didn't see him say it live, and had only seen it in articles and the news. I thought personally, based on how they had it, he was just speaking uncarefully.

          Then I see the real clip, and the guy legit says "Im not talking about the Nazis". I already had very little faith in the MSM and viewed them as propaganda, but this probably solidified it more than anything else for me. All of them edited the same way, all the stories saying the same thing, all of them completely lying in the most openly dishonest way imaginable.

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4fun7R5Wak&t=2034s

            Comments start around 33:30. Pretty sure that's the full video so people can't claim there's any missing context.

            Notably, it's from 6 months ago, but pops up in links as if this is something new that he's said.

          2. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

            he also finished with "They should be condemned. Utterly"

            How much more clear can you be saying the OPPOSITE of what the media claims.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      By the way, this is Zoomer-Journalism at its absolute fucking worst. Let's put aside for a moment what the context of Trump's statement was. Why would you use Oppo-research as your original source for a story? Even if you, the Journolisming student heard it first via the Committee to Re-Elect Joe Biden, you wouldn't SOURCE the shit from them. You would check out the statement from its original source first, verify context and validity, and then source the ORIGIINAL broadcast. You don't fucking forward a tweet from Fusion fucking GPS.

      1. Zeb   1 year ago

        Even in the highly selected quote it kind of sounds like he's being ironic.
        There's plenty of real shit to criticize about Trump. It's just pathetic that so many still just go with this kind of nonsense.

      2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

        They've gotten so lazy with their propaganda and used to all the likely suspects repeating the narrative and approving the talking points, that they dont even try anymore.

        Primary sources aren't ever used. Its either just repeated partisan hackery from clearly biased sources, or 'anonymous sources' which are either made up or planted spook shit.

        But hey, people keep making careers and winning pulitzers doing it, why not follow suit?

      3. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        You would check out the statement from its original source first, verify context and validity, and then source the ORIGIINAL broadcast.

        What?! You expect them to actually do their job? Crazy talk!

    3. Zeb   1 year ago

      Yeah, let's pretend we know nothing about Trump and the way he talks.

    4. Dillinger   1 year ago

      T said the Chinese will crack purple monkey dishwasher

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        He had me up until the purple monkey dishwasher.

      2. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        purple monkey dishwasher

        Dibs on the band name.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          I was in a band called Purple Monkey Dishwasher in the 80s. Should have had it copyrighted.

      3. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

        God damn. You're just as bad as the mainstream media! A few sentences later he clearly says that he's NOT talking about purple monkey dishwashers and that "they're to be condemned totally." Why do you need to make up statements from Trump making it look like he supports Purple monkey dishwashers when he's condemned them over and over again.

    5. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      a game of Retard-Telephone
      *ring*ring*ring*click*
      Hello, this is sarcasmic.....

  34. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>An immigration deal that's already collapsing

    one-sided "deal" should die. quickly.

  35. Minadin   1 year ago

    including McDonald's and Chipotle

    Chipotle IS McDonald's

    1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

      Yep. Chipotle is to Mexican food* what McDonald's is to hamburgers.

      *Taco Bell and Del Taco are to Mexican food whatever is below McDonald's (Burger King maybe?) is to hamburgers.

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        Taco Bell is superior to all fast food but Wendy's and Chick-fil-A.
        Sonic makes a great burger too.

        1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

          You need to find a bojangles

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            Grabbed that for lunch yesterday. Not disappointed.

          2. Nardz   1 year ago

            I haven't had Bojangles in at least 5 years, and I miss their country fried steak biscuit

      2. Ska   1 year ago

        Del Taco gets points for having decent fries, and that a taco place has fries at all is worth a mention.

        T Bell still holds a warm, gross place in my heart, and I'll eat T Bell about five times a year. Then again, so does White Castle, though that's more like once every five years.

      3. Zeb   1 year ago

        I do like McDs and Taco Bell. But I think of them as their own things. A McDonald's burger isn't a hamburger and I don't even know what the fuck to call Taco Bell food.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          I don’t even know what the fuck to call Taco Bell food.

          Latine cooking.

        2. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

          I don’t even know what the fuck to call Taco Bell food.

          Swill?

          And I say this as someone who ate my fair share of it in college ($0.49 for a taco).

          1. Zeb   1 year ago

            "Swill" is way too broad to be a useful description.

  36. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

    Taylor Swift's Midnights won Album of the Year at the Grammys, making her the first artist to claim the top prize four times. Miley Cyrus ("Flowers") and Billie Eilish ("What Was I Made For") won Record of the Year and Song of the Year, respectively.

    There was an awards show last night? Guess I was too busy not giving a shit.

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      Awards shows, late night TV, and hollywood in general is fighting for the few scraps/crumbs of cultural relevance that they collectively have left, and its not a lot. People have moved on

      1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        I read somewhere yesterday that the number one movie at this past weekend's domestic box office was Argylle with ~$18 million against a reported budget of ~$200 million. It's way down from this time last year, which was already way, way down from "pre-pandemic levels" (apparently they're still trotting that out as an overall excuse whether than looking in the mirror). They made their bed, now they can sleep in it. Fuck 'em.

        1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

          And that's after a 2023 when, despite everything being wide open for business, people wanting to be out and about, and COVID long in the rearview mirror (well, except in CA where they just lifted the state of emergency, fucking LOL)...box offices took massive beatings for almost everything except for Barbie and Oppenheimer. Hundreds of millions lost on multiple titles that would have been blockbusters in the past, billions lost collectively.

          In 2015-2019, every one of those movies would have at minimum made SOME money, or broke even. The majority of them bled millions upon millions in 2023.

          Its hack ham fisted writing that is just dripping in identity politics, and turns out after being beaten over the head with the above daily at work, on the news, people dont want to turn on their TV or go to the movies to 'escape' to basically the same shit that fills up their news feed every morning.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            At this point, just about anything Disney or its subsidiaries release is dead on arrival at the box office. Funny what happens when you decide to act like a political organization as a front for Iger's ambitions, rather than an entertainment company.

            Pretty much every studio is getting jackhammered right now; the one exception is Netflix, and I suspect it's because they ended password sharing and the net income they gained in FY23 was due to subscriber increases. Because they've released their share of shit, too, like the Witcher season 3 and the prequel series, that got bombed, and most of their offerings are complete garbage. The hilarious part is that the writer's and actor's strikes ended up delaying so many projects that 2024 is likely to only be Dune 2 for blockbusters and that's it.

            1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

              Netflix is definitely infiltrated by some of the absolute trash leftist writers. You mentioned Witcher show and prequel which is a perfect example. They race swapped pretty much all the female sorceresses, made half of them ugly and fat, pretty much took the entire focus from Geralt to Yennefer/Ciri, more race swaps planned for the next season, and shit on Cavill, the cis white chad who happens to be the only person on set that wanted to be true to the source material. Prequel show was just identity politics and a boring nonsensical story shat out onto the screen, and making the mistake of giving a mystical but specific origin story (how the first witcher was made) to something that would have been left better unsaid (*cough cough* Dr. Who *cough*)

              All that said, they do allow other creators to still make some good stuff. Blue Eye Samurai (I know, a cartoon) is actually pretty fucking great and skips most woke tropes, the show One Piece (based on anime, I know not up many people's ally) notably left creative control to the original writer (Witcher could really have used this) and because of this included things like an older girl telling a growing/developing male swordsman 'im better than you now because your young, but when your older I wont be able to beat you anymore' which is all but a thought crime in today's world. But they let creators like that keep their more based opinions, and surprise surprise, they end up with a better product.

              Also notably they stood up for Chapelle against the tranny mob, which few do nowadays. Netflix is still shitty in a lot of ways, but when compared to straight up propaganda operations like Disney, they are better by a mile

              1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

                From one analysis of what went wrong with "The Witcher" was that the original author, while a man of the Left, has an Eastern European view of politics, rather than the American "critical theory" view and the show writers hated it, which explains much of the changes they made to the story.

                1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

                  He also catered more toward the fantasy loving crowd that enjoys tales of a protagonist killing monsters, then getting black out drunk at the tavern and fucking some whores. This is not very popular with current day writers, so they replaced a lot of that with girlbossery, as that is current-thing

                  1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                    Not super familiar with the source material, but he seemed to want an interesting set of female characters for the male hero to have sex with. The Netflix writers wanted independent girl bosses who have no flaws and with no heroic male figures to be found.

                2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                  The show creator admitted that she was obsessed with Ciri and wanted to make the show about her. And yeah, it's also important to keep in mind that the UK film industry is just as much a haven of marxist scuzzbags as the American version. In fact, it's arguably worse, because like Canada, they have an inferiority complex about American leftism, and go way around the bend on theirs as compensation for that.

              2. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

                and shit on Cavill, the cis white chad who happens to be the only person on set that wanted to be true to the source material

                I gained a lot of respect for him when he decided to up and leave instead of continuing to be a part of it.

                1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

                  Also from info/clips of the making of the show, gained a ton of respect for him. They apparently wanted to make a huge joke over his horse dying and Cavill steered them away from that since it was absolutely out of character for Geralt to treat a loyal companion that way for a quick throw-away laugh. Multiple times he butt heads with the show runner over divergence from the source material.

                  There is that famous interview where they ask him about what amounts to 'angry fans' and him saying its actually the responsibility of the crew to be a good steward of the material and make an excellent adaptation because in the end the fans love it for what the material is, and we should be trying to make a product they like. Which is basically the antithesis of the Disney motto

                  1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                    Yeah, there's a clip going around the alt-media YouTube channels that shows the interview with Peter Jackson about making Lord of the Rings, and he directly stated that they needed to make the movies as faithful to Tolkien's vision and sensibilities as they could, without inserting their own presentist biases. Some of that nonsense still leaked through, such as with Arwen, for example, but this was also back when Current Year insufferability wasn't nearly as bad as it became after Obama was elected.

              3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Film Threat just did that big old piece on how Disney in particular had been infiltrated by commie activists, starting with Raya the Last Dragon. It sounds a lot like the podcast James Lindsay just did on "Stochastic Entryism," where commies use programs like DEI to get their commissars inside the institution and take it over--because the point of these programs isn't to actually run the institution in a functional manner, it's to use it as a breeding ground for marxist activism, much like how Freirean pedagogy is absolute shit at educating people, but is awesome at creating more marxist activists (see California and Colorado public school systems).

    2. MK Ultra   1 year ago

      I would have wagered that Killer Mike would get arrested, even though I've no idea who he is.

  37. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

    Is Miami succeeding despite having small government and being a living embodiment of globalization and creative destruction? That's what the prevailing narrative from the economic grievance-peddlers would have you believe. It seems more likely Miami is thriving because of those characteristics. And politicians should know that there are plenty of Americans, in Miami and elsewhere, who aren't crying out for protection from the market.

    Pure Dumbfuckery, The biggest industries in Miami are tourism, international trade, finance, healthcare, and real estate, what the hell would they need protection for?

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Globalism wanted to mandate that everyone within 6 feet of someone who worked or traveled on a cruise line get vaccinated. Ronnie D said, "No."

      Now, here we are in 2024, and everyone wants to pretend like the 2019 Global-level assfuckery never happened the way they pretend science wouldn't exist without government funding.

    2. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Does 'international trade' cover the whole drug thing?

  38. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>You can't afford fries with that.

    iirc my 1987 taco bell job in SoCal started in the $3.35 range and the cash immigants earned half that

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Look at Mr. Moneybags over here.

      1973, $1.35/hour.

    2. Zeb   1 year ago

      How much for a taco?

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        when we ran $.10 taco deals the place went bananas

    3. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

      GM factory workers in Mexico negotiated a 25 cents per hour raise last year. They make $3.25 an hour now. They can't afford to buy the vehicles they make.

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        How many Boeing engineers could afford a 747-400?

        1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

          How many Boeing engineers would buy one?
          How many Boeing engineers would fly in one?

        2. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

          None, but they could afford to buy a ticket and fly on one in addition to affording a GM (or better) vehicle.

      2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        How many line workers at Rolls Royce can buy the car they are building?

        1. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

          If they were building them in Mexico, probably all of them.

  39. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>"The goal here is to get these attacks to stop," Kirby said.

    is Kirby on record with DON'T! yet?

  40. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

    You can tell where there priorities are:

    Much of the spending in the bill would be directed overseas. Politico reports that the deal would send about $62 billion in military aid to Ukraine—more than the entire annual budget of the U.S. Marine Corps, Sen. Mike Lee (R–Utah) notes. It would also send about $14 billion in military assistance to Israel, while setting aside $10 billion in humanitarian aid for Ukraine and Gaza. Another $5 billion would be sent to various countries in the Indo-Pacific region, and about $20 billion would be directed to the immigration issues addressed in the bill.

    1. Dillinger   1 year ago

      that Reptile Alien Mayorkas says things are set at the border what do they need $20mil for?

      1. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

        Hair club for men.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Yeah, I've already seen neocons claiming that not approving this bill is doing Putin's bidding, and that "hey, it's not perfect, but it's something."

      It's telling how they'll agree to literally anything, if the 10% or less that contains what they actually want is included in the bill.

    3. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

      And not one thin dime to American citizens.

  41. (Impeach Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   1 year ago

    "Taylor Swift's Midnights won Album of the Year at the Grammys, making her the first artist to claim the top prize four times. Miley Cyrus ("Flowers") and Billie Eilish ("What Was I Made For") won Record of the Year and Song of the Year, respectively."

    The official spokeswomen for the countless millions and millions of crazy, fucked up, narcissistic American white chicks everywhere (the democratic party's second most important bloc after the negroes).

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      Well, I recognize what Taylor Swift looks like, and I've heard of Miely Cyrus...

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        I'm not entirely certain I could pick Swift out of a lineup.

  42. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'American forces bombed Iraq and Syria over the weekend, and more strikes are likely in the coming days. The attacks come in retaliation for a drone strike late last month that killed three American soldiers and wounded dozens of others.'

    Are you sure? I bet these attacks are in retaliation for voters paying too much attention to things that cast Biden in a negative light.

  43. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'Several fast food chains, including McDonald's and Chipotle, will respond to a hike in California's minimum wage for restaurant workers by raising menu prices, The Wall Street Journal reports.'

    Just wait for the price increases induced by state requirements for free-range, sustainable, vegan ingredients. And the reparations tax.

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      All of which are platforms in Newsom's presidential platform!

  44. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Did Reason send new Liz to the corn field?

    1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

      People were actually enjoying her Roundups too much. We just can't have nice things.

    2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago (edited)

      Worse. Berlin in winter.

      There's a reason my trip last month to hang out with my girlfriend, who lives in Berlin... was in Mexico. 😀

  45. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

    You can't afford fries with that. Several fast food chains, including McDonald's and Chipotle, will respond to a hike in California's minimum wage for restaurant workers by raising menu prices, The Wall Street Journal reports.

    Remember when the libs all tried to call themselves the "reality based" crew? Lol. Welcome to reality dumbshits.

    1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      It is entirely possible that their intention was to kill the fast food industry in CA by making it too expensive to operate.

      On the other hand, the Left does seem terribly confused that letting people loot stores means that companies operating the stores in areas prone to looting will close the stores.

      It is entirely possible they are just that stupid.

      1. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

        Prop 47 was voted in by the people of California. So yes, they are that stupid.

    2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      "There will never be any trade-offs to sanctuary cities, allowing crime, unlimited welfare, mandated wage increases, etc. There is such a thing as a free lunch" - the left

      Honestly, given the number of them that parrot Marx, this should be no surprise. He thought communism was the natural, inevitable end state before utopia, which flies in the face of all observable human nature and now, well documented history, yet they keep pushing it as if it will def work next time. Party of magical fantasy thinking

    3. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      Who said that reality had a liberal bias?

  46. Dillinger   1 year ago

    also when is this place going to cover the DNC J6 bomber & who was almost killed by the bomb?

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Kamala was evacuated but claimed for a year she was at the capitol. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    2. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      According to the book of Revelations, there will be trumpets and such - - - -

  47. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

    "What are we even doing here, you guys?"

    While I agree that we should not be there, the "danger" is not even remotely the reason for believing that! In fact, some of the people responsible for our being there are hoping that the conflict will escalate. They love having a world at war either because they want to smite the bad guys or just because war is cool and gives them more of the power they crave. Using the danger as THE argument risks losing the argument when the ordinary person we need to convince says, "I'm terrified of Islamic terrorists and the danger from them justifies risking a wider conflict!" We at least have a chance of convincing such people that if we brought our troops home to defend the U.S. we would all be a lot safer; instead of scattering them all over in a failed attempt to smite the bad guys that can never succeed.

    1. mtrueman   1 year ago (edited)

      “We at least have a chance of convincing such people that if we brought our troops home to defend the U.S. we would all be a lot safer;”

      Safety is not the issue. With any racket, ‘protection’ is only a pretext. There are thousands of US troops in the region for one reason: to ensure US control over our favorite fossil fuel.

      The same reason what prompted Biden to destroy the Russian pipeline to Germany. It had nothing to do with safety, but instead to ensure Germany's reliance on energy sources within US control.

      1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

        misconstrueman, prove it = The same reason what prompted Biden to destroy the Russian pipeline to Germany.

        To this day, the pipeline bomber(s) are unknown.

        1. mtrueman   1 year ago

          I'm sure somebody knows.

          1. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

            misconstrueman, the point is, you stated Biden destroyed the pipeline and tried to represent your insurrectal* opinion as fact. You misconstrued what was true.

            Hence, your name: miscontrueman.

            Insurrectal = pulled out of your ass
            (Voize and Mr. Bumble coined the term; it was ingenious)

            1. mtrueman   1 year ago

              "you stated Biden destroyed the pipeline "

              I'm so evil.

  48. edbeau99   1 year ago

    Right, a total of TWO (count 'em, 2) B-1's dropped one bomb on each of 85 targets. Targets that had been communicated to Iran in advance so that there would be no damage to the proxies that Iran uses to kill Americans. This is even worse than the Biden defeat in Afghanistan. When you shout weakness and indecision from the rooftops, you have to expect the world to go up in fire.

    1. mtrueman   1 year ago

      "When you shout weakness and indecision from the rooftops, you have to expect the world to go up in fire."

      It's more like shouting THEATER! at a crowded fire. But there are reports that some 18 died as a result of these attacks, so maybe Biden is more interested in escalation than you give him credit for.

  49. Sevo   1 year ago

    mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
    "Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."

    Thank you, Nazi shit, for making sure everyone knows.
    Fuck off and die; your family will celebrate.

  50. AT   1 year ago

    "The goal here is to get these attacks to stop," Kirby said. "We are not looking for a war with Iran."

    *eyeroll*

    This is what empowers Iran.

    I will vote for literally any candidate in 2024 that says, "We are looking for war with Iran, and mean to immediately exterminate them off the face of the planet with overwhelming indiscriminate force."

    Seriously, Iran has to go. The free world cannot abide their presence any longer. And if their Sino-Russian alliance has a problem with that, screw them - war.

  51. (Impeach Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   1 year ago

    Faggot.

  52. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago (edited)

    My thoughts are that I’ve had better stalkers who don’t change their screennames like pussies.

    I've already told you that I'm more than happy to actually meet up with you at the address I provided, and give you the chance to stab me in the temple like you said you wanted. So are you saying you actually want to go through with that now?

  53. (Impeach Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   1 year ago

    Put another cock in your mouth, Reason staff sockpuppet piece of shit.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!