NSA Purchases Internet Metadata To Spy on You Without a Warrant
A new letter from Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.) reveals that the agency admitted the practice nearly three years ago but would not allow him to reveal it.

The National Security Agency (NSA) is the latest intelligence agency spying on Americans without a warrant by buying access to their data.
That revelation comes from a letter released last week from Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.) to Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines. "As you know," Wyden wrote, "U.S. intelligence agencies are purchasing personal data about Americans that would require a court order if the government demanded it from communications companies."
Now, Wyden writes, the snoop in question is the NSA, which is "buying Americans' domestic internet metadata." Such information "can reveal which websites they visit and what apps they use," according to a press release from Wyden's office.
Wyden is right that Haines is likely already aware of the practice: A report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) completed in January 2022 (but only declassified in June 2023) found that the intelligence community "currently acquires a significant amount of [commercially available information] for mission-related purposes," information which "can include credit histories, insurance claims, criminal records, employment histories, incomes, ethnicities, purchase histories, and interests" and "in some cases social media data."
Data brokers collect and package this data for sale. Often this information is purchased by other companies for purposes like advertising, but increasingly, government agencies are purchasing the information for their own purposes: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention purchased cellphone location data in order to monitor compliance with lockdown orders; the IRS paid for similar data in an effort to track criminal suspects.
"Until recently, the data broker industry and the intelligence community's (IC) purchase of data from these shady companies has existed in a legal gray area, which was in large part due to the secrecy surrounding the practice," Wyden wrote. "The secrecy around data purchases was amplified because intelligence agencies have sought to keep the American people in the dark."
Wyden says he actually learned the NSA was buying Americans' internet metadata in March 2021, but the agency "refused…to clear the unclassified information for public release" for nearly three years. "It was only after I placed a hold on the nominee to be the NSA director that this information was cleared for release." Wyden includes letters from NSA officials written in December 2023, agreeing to allow the information to be released.
In Carpenter v. United States in 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that it was a violation of the Fourth Amendment for law enforcement to access cellphone location data without a warrant. The 2022 ODNI report noted that under Carpenter, "acquisition of persistent location information (and perhaps other detailed information) concerning one person by law enforcement from communications providers is a Fourth Amendment 'search' that generally requires probable cause." But since "the same type of information on millions of Americans is openly for sale to the general public," intelligence agencies "treat the information as" publicly available and "can purchase it."
Similarly, Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security Ronald Moultrie advised Wyden that "I am not aware of any requirement in U.S. law or judicial opinion," including Carpenter, that intelligence agencies "obtain a court order in order to acquire, access, or use information, such as [commercially available information], that is equally available for purchase to foreign adversaries, U.S. companies, and private persons as it is to the U.S. Government."
That explanation is cold comfort when, as Wyden's press release noted, spy agencies can "us[e] their credit card to circumvent the Fourth Amendment." The intelligence community previously seemed to understand this, with the 2022 ODNI report noting that while it "cannot willingly blind itself to this information, it must appreciate how unfettered access to [commercially available information] increases its power in ways that may exceed our constitutional traditions or other societal expectations." The collection of such data could also "raise the risk of mission creep," as information "collected for one purpose may be reused for other purposes."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can we do away with the "Meta". It is just data. I hear from too many spooks, "that it is just metadata" as if that justifies it or that it is something other than 1s and 0s.
You could consider SSN numbers metadata. They describe us, but our not us, therfore meta.
And then... wait for it.... nothing happened.
No, surely they'll all be punished!
*looks over at Snowden*
OK, maybe not.
They will be hired by Silicon Valley, major news networks, and form corporations to modulate speech and gather this information anyways, always colluding with those still in the IC.
Like a mockingbird?
>>spying on Americans without a warrant by buying access to their data.
c'mon guys! with our own money?
Just another day in the Biden Authoritarian Regime.
You are treading on thin ice here. Speculating about "mission creep" while, as they pointed out, even China can buy the same information on the open market completely misses the point! No one should be legally allowed to sell your personal information without your personal, explicit consent; and no government agency should be allowed to obtain that information without a warrant based upon probable cause. That should be a matter of Federal law, requiring that language in all commercial contracts and if prices rise, creative service providers will no doubt find a way to incentivize their customers financially to opt in.
No one should be legally allowed to sell your personal information without your personal, explicit consent
You know all those EULA you hit 'I agree' on without reading?
That's what those agreements specifically allow.
If you aren't charged for a service, you are the product. It's that simple.
You know all those EULA you hit ‘I agree’ on without reading?
You know that EULA that you think is any sort of binding contract one way or the other? Ron Wyden is half the reason you falsely believe that.
If you think "I didn't sign an EULA, ergo I'm not being tracked because I didn't consent." you're a moron.
https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/google-under-investigation-for-tracking-users-location-without-consent-says-report/
EULAs, as you mention, are considered mostly legally non binding as the contracts are too one sided.
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/understanding-eulas
I hit them because I don't care if they sell my information to anyone else. If it keeps my prices lower it's fine with me. The point is that they should not be allowed to sell my information to anyone else UNLESS I hit that button. All clear now?
"no government agency should be allowed to obtain that information without a warrant based upon probable cause. "
You're spot on with this.
If Ron Wyden doesn't like massive tech corporations hoovering up users' private information, colluding with governments, and voiding their users' rights and ignoring their wishes with impugnity, he should (get fucked and then...) build his own internet.
Remember that day (not long ago actually) when the "Union of States" government was actually prohibited from using military tactics on domestic soil?
Is there really a USA anymore; or is it a Nazi-Empire and a Hitler?
It's B.
Didn't we all know this already? I think this is another case of Reason being three years behind the commentariat.
"The National Security Agency (NSA) is the latest intelligence agency spying on Americans without a warrant by buying access to their data."
Yeah, so what's your point?
Just because information is commercially available -- even to our "adversaries" -- doesn't mean our government agencies may use that information contrary to the Constitution. Government may not employ a third party to do what it is not allowed to do itself.
Two separate issues there. The question here is whether they should be allowed to BUY the information on sale to everyone else who wants to buy it. Whether they can USE that information to investigate a particular person without probable cause is a separate matter and the obvious answer should be "no." That's where the mission creep thingie comes in.
No, they can't buy it. It's the same concept. Just because they paid someone else to do it doesn't make it right.
So you don't have any problem with the private sector vacuuming up people's data without any real consent - or in them selling that data for whatever purpose to anybody (eg the Chinese govt or Iranians or AlQaeda). Except the NSA. That's an off limits buyer.
What a load of shit you corporatists are. Economies based on theft are profitable as hell but they can never be either just or further real liberty. The world has understood the issues related to data privacy and computers for decades. Have understood exactly how to deal with each of those issues since at least 1980 with the OECD Data Privacy Guidelines. Could have understood the issues of how to create INDIVIDUAL privacy rights to one's property - out of thin air no less - by studying the 1912 election.
Now that technology can vacuum up and store everything - and AI - trained on stolen data - can 'fill in the gaps' of what might be 'known'; there is good reason for regular folks to fear what might be done TO them using personal information they are not even allowed to claim is their property. Whether NSA does it or BigData does it or China does it is irrelevant. It's a world where the little guy is just a slave to powers that are way beyond his control.
Libertarians are fucking useless. All hail Pirates.
Shouldn't Reason be vehemently defending this? This is after all "private companies" doing what they want with "their data" as a purely unbiased operator in the free market. Or is this defense only applicable when they're shutting down conservatives at the behest of Democrats?
Until the private companies sell to the government for our money, then it becomes a public issue.
Once your money is extorted from you as taxes it's not your money anymore, catch up with the last 100 years of taxing legal authority will you.
it’s not your money anymore
It's still OUR money.
I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell you.
Since NSA is using my tax dollars to buy my data, if I just went ahead and gave them all my data, would I get a tax break?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————>>> http://Www.work.salary49.Com