Canada's Trucker Crackdown
Plus: TED's "genocide apologists," California's speed limits, NYPD's inability to handle road blockages, and more...

Appealing emergency powers ruling: Earlier this week, Canada's finance minister said the government will appeal a court ruling that declared unreasonable its use of emergency powers to shut down the Canadian trucker COVID-19 mandate protests in 2022.
"A federal judge earlier on Tuesday said the Liberal government's use of the Emergencies Act to clear the 'Freedom Convoy' demonstrations that paralyzed the national capital in 2022 was unreasonable and violated Charter rights," reports Reuters. The "Freedom Convoy" was a group of truckers who flooded into Canada's capital, Ottawa, to protest the cross-border vaccine mandate between Canada and the U.S., which threatened their ability to work and infringed on their medical freedom.
It lasted for a month, spanning the end of January 2022 and much of February, and resulted in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau using his emergency powers to arrest protesters and freeze their bank accounts (which they then countered by using bitcoin to buy basic necessities) to attempt to suppress their political speech.
"I conclude that there was no national emergency justifying the invocation of the Emergencies Act and the decision to do so was therefore unreasonable and ultra vires," wrote Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley in a ruling issued this past Tuesday.
"I was convinced at the time it was the right thing to do, it was the necessary thing to do. I remain and we remain convinced of that," said Canada's finance minister in response, announcing the intention to appeal.
For more on the Canadian trucker protests, check out this excellent documentary produced by my Just Asking Questions co-host Zach Weissmueller.
TED fellows pitch a fit over "genocide apologists": Who are these genocide apologists, you might wonder? Defenders of the state of Israel and its response to Hamas' October 7 attack, during which innocent civilians were burned alive!
"Five participants in the TED fellows program, which supports and promotes emerging voices in a variety of fields across the globe, resigned Wednesday after the public-speaking organization invited hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman and journalist Bari Weiss to speak at its 2024 flagship conference in Vancouver," reports National Review. A letter sent to TED's leadership accused the organization of choosing "not only to align itself with enablers and supporters of genocide, but to amplify their racist propaganda."
Ackman has purportedly "defended Israel's genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people and has cynically weaponised antisemitism in his programme to purge American universities of Pro-Palestinian freedom of speech" while Weiss has, in their telling, "weaponised antisemitism to defend Israel's genocide in Gaza and has a track record of transphobic extremism." No nuance contained within, about how the Israel-Palestine conflict is, uh, fairly complicated. (And detail provided to substantiate the transphobe claim? A truly unhinged laundry list of all the wrongthinkers Weiss has platformed over the years.)
It remains to be seen whether TED will kowtow to the haters. But it's a very bad sign when people ostensibly affiliated with the organization due to their intellectual rigor and nuance end up showing such profound incuriousness, and want to dissociate from those with whom they disagree.
For more on TED-related craziness, check out this recent Nick Gillespie x Coleman Hughes interview, in which Hughes details how he was treated by the organization.
Scenes from New York: The city has a law on the books, called right-to-shelter, that forces it to provide emergency housing for those in need—frequently homeless people, but now also newly-arrived migrants. The only problem, other than the fact that New York City taxpayers are coughing up for it, is that the city is beyond capacity, with no end in sight to the influx. "The Legal Aid Society, which monitors the city's compliance with the right-to-shelter mandate, said on Monday that it had been told by the city that on any given night, 800 to 1,000 migrants are left on the waiting list, and that the average wait for a bed is more than eight days," reports The New York Times.
QUICK HITS
- California legislators can't seem to get basic quality of life issues under control but, sure, let's regulate this:
A bill by State Sen. Scott Wiener would require new cars to have tech that would stop them from going more than 10 mph over the speed limit. https://t.co/966CZEDccW
— The San Francisco Standard (@sfstandard) January 24, 2024
- Xi Jinping is in trouble, reports Bloomberg: "Confidence in the Chinese economy is at its lowest ebb in decades."
- Latest Just Asking Questions just dropped, in which Zach Weissmueller and I interview Marcos Falcone and chat about Javier Milei's Davos speech, Argentina's shock therapy, and whether the new president's critique of social justice is correct. PLEASE reach out via DM or email if you like what you see, have suggestions for how to improve the show, or want to see a particular guest or topic covered.
- "Have you ever wondered why empty storefronts in major cities stay empty for so long?" asks Tyler Cowen over at Marginal Revolution, linking to a new paper on "high-rent blight."
- More weird AI applications.
- "Almost anything that is considered a big deal in Hollywood gets discussed, and treated, as if it is a big deal for America," writes Jim Geraghty over at National Review, covering Margot Robbie.
- Stunning media malpractice from The New York Times:
Found something fucked up. THIS is how the New York Times describes Milei's deregulatory actions?
"Would have consequences" is bizarrely (I might even say DELIBERATELY) vague.
The omnibus bill is *not* consolidating more power in Milei's hands; it's returning power to… pic.twitter.com/kV7ExhgIIi
— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) January 25, 2024
- Is this a democracy?
Congressional staff are increasingly challenging their own bosses in a bid to shift the balance of power on Capitol Hill, representing a sea change in the relationship between lawmakers and the legions of workers who ensure the House and Senate function. https://t.co/0Am5wA2t8V
— Bloomberg Government (@BGOV) January 24, 2024
- BRB renaming my New York section Dispatches from Dumbopolis:
The ACLU's recent settlement with the NYPD requires that when a protest "temporarily blocks vehicular or pedestrian traffic or otherwise obstructs public streets or sidewalks, the NYPD shall whenever possible accommodate the demonstration"
— Sanjana Friedman (@metaversehell) January 25, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...Canada's finance minister said the government will appeal a court ruling that declared unreasonable its use of emergency powers to shut down the Canadian trucker COVID-19 mandate protests in 2022.
The True North, strong and "free".
“Liberal” government.
The finance minister's name is a nice bit of irony.
"Fascismo"?
So is Trucker Crackdown, given that the Mounties weren't unleashed on Tucker Carlson for his Lèse-majesté in needling Trudeau in Calgary and Winnipe
"A federal judge earlier on Tuesday said the Liberal government's use of the Emergencies Act to clear the 'Freedom Convoy' demonstrations that paralyzed the national capital in 2022 was unreasonable and violated Charter rights,"
It absolutely floored me that they found a judge who wasn't bought and paid or too frightened to make this ruling.
Mirroring what's happening in the U.S. our judicial system has become blatantly corrupt and is largely a rubber stamp for the Liberal party.
Surprised this judge hasn't been "quarantined" yet, he's obviously got a case of the MAGAs.
Who will be held to account, is the question.
How many appeals levels above him to correct the ruling?
The Canadian Supreme Court is reliably staffed.
“Fortified”, one might say.
Coincidentally, a January 26, 2024 article in Reason "No, Blocking Traffic Is Not Protected by the First Amendment . . . It also does not give you carte blanche to violate other laws" by Billy Binion condemns a convoy blocking the route to the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in protest of the Israeli genocide in Palestine.
Thus, there are actually two Reason/Libertarian parties. One condemns pedestrians blocking a highway in the name of free speech, the other defends the right to seize an entire area and run diesels outside apartments.
Guess it just depends what is being protested.
I conclude that there was no national emergency justifying the invocation of the Emergencies Act...
Next time they'll have to do a better job inventing one.
https://twitter.com/SaysSimulation/status/1750869184802636053?t=lBnSXE6M8sAD69cQw-iyuA&s=19
We may be having the greatest Constitutional crisis in 160 years, as 26 states face off against the Feds - but there is an effective news blackout, outside of X. Why?
1. Confirmation this is a factional dispute.
2. Confirmation the "media" is pure propaganda, not news.
This should be front-page news, and the center of conversation for the entire country. Yet, the WSJ, NYT, NPR and others are pretending nothing is happening. Normies not on X have no idea, unless they saw it somewhere else in social media.
This absolutely confirms that role of the media is to distribute the approved information that serves the interests of the ruling coalition.
This blackout is completely incompatible with any claims that the media actually reports the news, we're seeing this in plain sight.
The issue is that if there is a factional dispute within the ruling coalition - then the media doesn't know who to take its orders from. So, blackout.
I don't think this is just the Repubs. The money class is likely weighing in as well, those who own the newspapers
as well as the networks.
Keep in mind - none of these factions in the ruling coalition are the friends of the average people of America or the Heartland. This isn't about helping us.
Nonetheless, however, this could tear the coalition apart, opening up opportunities.
Serious request from a normie (or at least I like to think so) not on X. I don't have an account so on your link I can't get beyond a map that's described as 26 states and a crisis with no further information.
You are right that I don't know what crisis you are referring to. Could you say what it is? Is it something about immigration, or election laws, or what? Or is it just that some states go Republican and some go Democratic and that's unacceptable?
A bunch of progtards want Biden to mobilize the US military against Texas, because Texas is defying the recent USSC ruling and insisting on defending the border and stopping illegal immigration, since the feds apparently won't.
Slightly more than half the states have recently signed a letter supporting Texas's position in the matter.
There's no indication that Biden actually plans to send the actual military in, other than his vague ramblings about F-15's and the 2nd amendment not applying to cannons. And there's no indication that the US military would obey such an order, if given.
Problem is Texas didn't even defy an order. The injunction was to stop DHS from tearing down state owened property. The USSC just removed the injunction. There were no orders on Texas.
I was trying to give the progtard reasoning for starting Civil War 2.0.
Except that the ruling by the USSC was so that the Admin could take down the barbed wires to their facilities, but it apparently did not prevent Texas from installing more.
Right now, it's a stand off. We'll see where it goes before the end of the day.
https://babylonbee.com/news/texas-finds-loophole-with-super-ouchy-pokey-wire
And there’s no indication that the US military would obey such an order, if given.
I'm pretty confident the commanders would follow such an order. The issue is whether they'd end up with a mutiny from anyone who might be from Texas and doesn't have a problem with what Abbott is doing.
Also, it's important to remember that Biden isn't in control here. He's a pudding-brained puppet who says what he's told to say. What's at stake is how much his handlers want to escalate this, because this is a potential Fort Sumter/Lexington and Concord type of event.
I doubt it would be limited to people from Texas.
""He’s a pudding-brained puppet who says what he’s told to say. ""
Anyone seen Jeff Dunham lately?
Thanks, Minadin. Good to get a real answer to a real question.
Here's another synopsis:
https://notthebee.com/article/the-civil-war-20-memes-are-here-if-you-need-a-laugh-cry-break-from-your-friday
If you don't know what "greatest constitutional crisis in 160 years" refers to, then I don't know how to help you.
...then again, the last decade has been rather full of astoundingly hostile acts by the powers that be.
In this case, it refers to half the states in the country supporting Texas' right to tell the federal government to fuck off, we'll protect the border ourselves.
I was aware of the SC ruling. Never thought of it as a constitutional crisis, Biden’s mumblings are those of a confused old man.
Seems to me at the very worst it’s at the crisis level of forcible school desegregation, which did not lead to a civil war. If it comes to sending in federalized National Guard or something like, someone will back down. I understand you're super angry about the border but I do not believe you're willing to go die in combat over it. Greg Abbot even less so.
As far as the underlying issue, I’m with Fist of Etiquette. Why aren’t we hearing about who holds the deeds to the properties and what they want – individually, not collectively?
I understand you’re super angry about the border but I do not believe you’re willing to go die in combat over it. Greg Abbot even less so.
Are you one of the center-right dickheads from Patterico sockpuppeting here? You have the same obsequious tone.
This should be front-page news, and the center of conversation for the entire country. Yet, the WSJ, NYT, NPR and others are pretending nothing is happening. Normies not on X have no idea, unless they saw it somewhere else in social media.
To be fair, they've been covering this on the evening nightly news, with the typical spin you'd expect.
I was convinced at the time it was the right thing to do, it was the necessary thing to do. I remain and we remain convinced of that...
Is she denying the court's ruling??? IS SHE AN INSURRECTIONIST???
The rioters are a paid red guard the dems prop up to erode society.
And we should deal with them accordingly. Pepper spray and paintballs is a good start.
I think lead is more effective
Pepper spray and paintballs will help get working people to work. Clear those bridges.
Lead keeps people from burning down your buildings or belting you with skateboards.
What do you think would happen if they got run over, say, by a rogue red SUV? These righteous warriors are putting themselves in harm's way, right? Shouldn't we help them to Valhalla?
Question: how many virgins to SJWs get in heaven?
99.
But they are all trans.
And as beautiful as LIzzo.
We need common sense red SUV control!
And should they fail to get the message, enfilade fire from M2s.
There is very few things in life a little Ma Deuce can't fix. Can we also utilize some MK-19s, make a real mess of it? Maybe a couple of daisy chained claymores 'this side towards enemy' if it's pointing at you, you're the enemy.
CIWS
…on any given night, 800 to 1,000 migrants are left on the waiting list..
So NYC is breaking the law. Who is going to be prosecuted?
Trump.
Meanwhile in Texas...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/war-red-states-rally-round-texas-battle-brews-biden-over-border
Call up the F-15’s and nuclear weapons!
I honestly wouldn't put it past him. A glass parking lot between New York and San Francisco would suit most urban progressives just fine.
Well, the subsequent starvation in the coastal cities would result in the massive depopulation they want.
Don't be silly, food comes from grocery stores.
And food trucks.
You're projecting your fondness for mass murder onto those you want to mass murder.
Ideas! Here to have in depth discussions well cited to back his views!
Just glad you never cry about "you" statements or you would seem hypocritical.
That doesn't even make sense, you gibbering little retard.
These are concepts put forth by sleepy joe.
How much did you imbibe already this morning? That comment only makes sense if you're inebriated.
hat comment only makes sense if you’re inebriated.
Or if your only mission is to push a Leftist narrative.
It isnt desire to push a leftist narrative.
It is intellectual laziness on relying solely on corporate narratives which are captured by leftists. Why he immediately started pushing trump is hitler without a hint of thought or introspection. His primary issue is lack of intellectual curiosity and laziness.
We have seen this often recently with his historical ignorance on slavery and mass murder where he claimed both are pushed on dehumanization. I honestly don't think he is educated on history at all. Nor on economics. He just puts up a facade of knowledge at the most shallow repetition of headlines. Similar to what we see with shrike. Why he relies on quotes and links he doesn't read to defend his bumper stickers.
Occasionally he will have a correct facial understanding on a topic, but it unravels so quickly in support of easy narratives because he has no depth of understanding of the topics.
LOL this coming from the guy who thinks The Federalist is straight news, and who never hesitates to push the current right-wing narrative regardless of its validity.
What applies to Sarc applies equally to you too, dude.
sure whatever, troll
Bite me.
So the left even projects 'projecting' now? Talk about a complete failure of imagination.
Projecting and victimhood whining is all they have left.
More room for solar panels and windmills.
The funniest part is listening to ignorant leftist claim Abbot is violating the USSC. Even though they cheer Biden ignoring them on student loans. And ignoring the fact the judicial order only effected DHS and not Texas.
And the funnier part is that all the Supremes did was put an end to the lower court order that the Border Patrol couldn't remove the razor wire. It doesn't prevent the TNG or Texas State Guard from putting up more.
If they didn't have *double* standards . . .
What is Biden going to do? Send the military in to forcibly open the border? In an election year?”
i though it was Trump who was going to launch teh military against Americans, who knew it would be the dems again
Well, you have to define "Americans". Are we talking about potential victims of actual physical force in the hinterland, or victims of emotional violence in key metro areas?
My favorite new tactic of the leftists is how they are screaming that it's Trump and the Republicans fault because they won't pass the Senate bill on immigration reform. So, a bill written in the past couple of weeks not passing is responsible for the over 6 million illegal aliens over the past three years? Not passing reform is responsible for not enforcing the law for three years in a row? And looking at the Senate bill, it's basically just rubber stamping what's already being done without congressional approval, so how is that going to stop illegal entries? It's basically typical leftists 'compromise' which means the left gives up nothing, the right gets nothing, but it's a compromise because the left doesn't ask for everything it wants all at once.
And I was told Kamala Harris was going to handle the issue. Is there still a problem?
You know who else drew a line in the sand in Texas?
Sam Houston?
Actually, it was William Travis, it didn't end well for him, but it gave Houston the time he needed to rally the rest of Texas.
Man. Get to use a bookmark in under 40 minutes.
sarcasmic 36 mins ago
Flag Comment Mute User
It’s getting to a point where the people involved and their defenders are so unlikeable that I’m finding it difficult to care.
More unlikable people for sarc to not care about. Court case against pro life portestors who committed no violence or damages and simply prayed and sang songs is ongoing, they are facing 11 years in jail.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/video-played-at-trial-shows-pro-lifers-targeted-by-doj-singing-hymns-urging-peace-during-protest
Call back to yesterday. Stabbing a man 100 times got zero jail time.
People need to be “likable” to defend.
Principles!
And Equity!
Principles and ideas!
"I’m finding it difficult to care."
Spoiler: Sarcasmic never cared. The bitter drunk would load people on the cattle cars himself if CNN told him to.
Yep. You guys make it really difficult to give a shit about anything you give a shit about. Keep it up.
Principles!
You guys make it really difficult to give a shit about anything you give a shit about.
Peak retard - "I hate whatever you like". Quick, everyone tell Sarcasmic you love alcohol and hate sobriety.
Already did when he announced his fake sobriety. Didn't last the week.
It is difficult for any sane moral person to agree with anything that you or ML or Troll Mac or ITL say because you are such disgusting reprehensible trolls. Most of what you all say are lies and half-truths. You have to dig into the weeds to find anything worth agreeing with you about, because your surface-level claims are almost certainly false. Such as this very article.
From your article, describing the protest at the clinic:
See that? All they did was pray and sing and "urge women" not to get abortions. And that Biden is a horrible human being trying to target peaceful people who are singing and praying. All in the name of killing babies! The monster! Right?
Here is another side of the story, that your article will never report and you and your team will never truthfully acknowledge:
https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2024/01/25/mt-juliet-abortion-clinic-carafem-blockade-case-goes-to-federal-trial/72325328007/
Oh, so according to this source, the protestors did more than just sing and pray - they physically blocked access to the clinic. That's a little more serious.
So, argue all you want about whether the FACE act should even exist, whether the Biden DOJ is going after these protestors for political reasons, whether abortion should be legal, all of those. All legitimate questions. But you are lying about what happened in this protest. You are lying by omission - I'm quite certain those protestors did pray and sing, but it sure looks like they did MORE than that.
And purposefully obstructing access to a legal business ought to be a crime, whether it is an abortion clinic or not, whether it is prosecuted by the feds vs. the state or not. Not only is it a form of trespassing, but it causes economic damages to the business when they aren't able to conduct their daily activities.
You lie about what's really going on in this case, you lie about the nature of the real crime here, and even if I were to agree with you that the FACE act shouldn't exist, I don't really want to ratify your dishonesty by providing any support to your position at all because you are such a dishonest jerk.
95% of the commentariat are obviously conservative (small c, limited government) and/or libertarian (small l, pro NAP). For the most part, a mix of both. That has remained true for a couple decades now, in spite of Reason's drift towards progressivism. The only obvious "trolls", and obvious proponents of increased federal government involvement, are folks like you, sarcasmic, SPB, White Mike, etc. You are the ones who shit up the threads with pro government bullshit. Its so ridiculously obvious; no one is buying your bullshit. But you keep gaslighting and proposing submission to this insanity. Just fuck off already. Seriously nobody likes you.
And before you post something retarded, as I know you will, conservative is context sensitive, as you know. I'm using it in the traditional, limited government/pro freedom, context. And don't claim to be a classic liberal. You're a statist tool and a fat pedo and everyone knows it.
It must be so hard for Sarc and Lyingjeffy, being the only true libertarians in here with this sea of mean girls. I mean, I don't know how they cope.
""The defendants are charged with violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a federal law prohibiting the obstruction of a person’s ability to access reproductive health care. If convicted, they each face up to 11 years in prison and fines of up to $250,000.""
So what if someone can't get to the clinic because protestors are blocking the street you take to get there?
That’s (D)ifferent.
11 years in jail for trespassing is insane. At most they should get a $50 fine.
According to the Tennessean, they blocked pathways rather than simply encouraging people to change their minds. That probably warrants a $100 fine.
Who are these genocide apologists, you might wonder?
I don't think there's any doubt who they're talking about. Just surprised they didn't reflexively throw in "colonizers" while they're at it.
I'm impressed they've managed to co-opt the term 'Anti-Semitic' to mean 'anti the people killing Jews'.
Well, Arabs are a semitic ethnicity as well, so it not technically wrong but it is definitely not what most people mean.
Not to mention they forgot to condemn the Israelis for allegedly making Palestinians drink sea water, even though Gaza’s population didn’t die in 3 days.
Oh, and they forgot Herr Misek’s allegation that Israel threatened to use nukes against Gaza. TED Talks could be the new Night at the Improv with Comedy Gold like that!
🙂
😉
Needz moar "open air prison" references.
Herr Misek would surely provide them.
I looked at the list of anti-semites....they're all a bunch of nobodys. Who gives a shit what these TED rejects think?!
"You can't give shit leftards an inch...if you give them an inch, they will use it to destroy you."--Pope Milei I
Just confirming that many Liberals are antisemitic, as if we didn’t know. Even Jewish liberals are antisemitic, whether they know it or not.
Just another facet of their oppressed victim lifestyle: self-hate.
Is this Genocide like that Genocide of Trans Folx?
If ENB did the round up she would be praising the nyt review of milei
Only if it involved sex work.
Stunning media malpractice from The New York Times:
this is my shocked face
Let me guess, democracy and life as we know it are in danger if the govt gets less power? (its not coming up in this browser)
Everyone knows nothing says democracy more than unelected bureaucrats running everything,free of any consequences and not answerable to the elected head of their branch of government. Says so in the secret copy the Constitution, written in invisible ink, and illuminati secret code, kept in the secret vault in Lincoln's nose on Mt Rushmore, the one Nicolas Cage found, but it was covered up.
Stunning media malpractice from The New York Times:
So… A day ending in “y”, then?
Hey, Duranty ends in "Y".
As Andrew Klavan refers to the NYT "a former newspaper".
The NY Times didn't invent media malpractice, but it has perfected it.
Those following along know that the J6 committee deleted and encrypted a lot of information prior to the GOP taking control of the house, done the week prior. One of the artifacts was creating a report sent to the WH. This report was also deleted. Current House has asked for the report to be sent back to Congress. The WH sent back a heavily redacted House report back to the House and refuses to give them an unredacted version.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/house-j6-investigator-says-white-house-cooperation-unacceptable-warns-evidence
Nothing says democracy like secret documents.
Most transparent administration ever.
You can see right through the smoke from the burning documents.
Nothing suspicious there.
Too bad there's not an Edward Snowden around to narc these fuckers out.
Separation of powers!
It will be released unredacted next January - - - - - - - - - -
Joy Reid demonstrates that she's an idiot, again.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/joy-reid-says-securing-border-segregation-1960s
Best part was MSNBC censored some of the content presented to Reid to show why the books shouldn't be in school.
"I'm sorry, but we can't show that to majors"
they cant even air the content on cable news that they want minors to read in school
fucking. clown. world.
*honk honk*
When she was asked - "When is a strap-on dildo appropriate in a classroom?"
Reid is nothing but a propagandist.
Porn director skool. Maybe Bad Dragon customer service employee training.
That may be the moment that woke/dei/leftist craziness jumped the shark. Trump should make that a campaign ad and air the fuck out of it.
Never underestimate the ability of the left to sweep things like that under the rug. They've jumped the shark so many times that most of us have lost count and it hasn't caused them any real problems yet.
I'd agree that it would make for a powerful campaign ad though.
Joy Reid demonstrates that she’s an idiot, again.
So... A day ending in "y", then?
Yep.
Only the ones that also start with consonants.
Obviously, enough people enjoy watching her idiocy that she is still on.
Stupid people outnumber smart people by a wide margin.
I wonder when they will realize that almost nobody gives a shit about 'muh racism' other than their own insane crew.
Mitt Romney, professional cuckling, was going to 'put blacks back in chains'.
The concept has completely lost any umph.
I wonder when they will realize that almost nobody gives a shit about ‘muh racism’ other than their own insane crew.
The problem is that their own insane crew is in charge of the western hegemony at the moment, so they feel obligated to impose their neuroses on everyone else.
1619 all over again.
3238?
The only problem, other than the fact that New York City taxpayers are coughing up for it, is that the city is beyond capacity, with no end in sight to the influx.
Not the law's problem. And the Supreme Court has outlawed concertina wire, so don't even think about that, Adams.
"And the Supreme Court has outlawed concertina wire"
Incorrect. All the USSC has said is the the DHS is allowed to cut it. Abbot is still allowed to keep putting it up if he wants.
Buy stock in concertina wire makers!
As long as someone else has to put it up, I hated messing with that shit. Nothing ruins a good set of BDUs faster than concertina wire. I suggest the Texas NG puts up triple strand of coiled concertina wire with fifty feet of barbed wire tangle foot on both sides and noisemakers, and then the CBP can try and cut it all they want, and then when the noisemakers go off they'll know which section needs to be spliced.
ADL sent letter to counter terrorism unit of FBI to go after LibsOfTikTok, Matt Walsh and others.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/01/24/exclusive-adl-urged-law-enforcement-target-opponents-transgender-ideology/
The adl attacks orthodox jew. That sounds about right
Better stop those evil Jews from spreading transphobia, ADL!
I'm still convinced we're being pranked on a global scale and one day Alan Funt will peek out from behind the moon and tell the whole planet that we've been on Candid Camera.
The adl was started to defend a pedofile rapist
An accused pedophile rapist who was lynched by Jew-hating rabble, whose sentence was posthumously commuted to life, who was posthumously pardoned, and whom historians think was wrongfully convicted.
Leo Frank–Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank
The ADL is a far cry from what it was, but Leo Frank was a legitimate victim of injustice.
And you are a Dummy. You and Reverend Artie both deserve each other as Men of the Moth-Eaten Cloth.
And people wonder why I’m so down on religion.
Hey, we don't want the wrong people to hear what liberals actually said, do we?
The LOTT hatred is a true sign of the times. It is all of a sudden hate speech to share videos that people publicly shared. It would be different if they sniped them from private feeds or out of email chains. Sharing videos but hoping only the right people see them seems like a bad strategy.
Yeah, I mean it worked out so well for Bud Light after all.
A bill by State Sen. Scott Wiener would require new cars to have tech that would stop them from going more than 10 mph over the speed limit.
Even law enforcement cars? EVEN STATE SENATOR CARS???
Why 10mph over? Rules are rules!
See, most blokes when they're driving, they push it to the limit. Where do you go from there? 10mph over, right. So, what we do, when we need that extra jolt of speed, is drive 10mph faster.
Why not just make the speed limit higher and then have the cars drive the speed limit?
**stupid look on face** These cars drive 10mph faster.
"Mine goes 11 mph faster."
I think State Sen. Scott Wiener's constituents need to follow his car around with a speed gun.
Or just a gun, perhaps?
Or an F15?
Well, at least his name checks out.
Bill specifically exempts government vehicles, first responders, etc.
The law sounds dangerous. There are times when you might need to drive faster than that (getting to the hospital, when someone is chasing you, outrunning a forest fire, etc.)
Passing on a two lane and there suddenly is an incoming vehicle and it's to late to slow down and get back behind the vehicle you're passing (this can happen for a variety of reasons, a blind spot in the terrain that hid the oncoming vehicle from your sight when you went to pass, the vehicle you're passing is driven by an asshole who speeds up when you try to pass, the oncoming vehicle is driving over the speed limit and thus overtakes you faster than they should have, etc).
Drivers from a state that rhymes with "bassachusetts" will actually gun it if you try to pass them on a two lane road.
Ten mph over which speed limit? School zone? Municipal, interstate, county highway? How exactly will the car know which speed limit is in force for the roadway they are on? This is almost as stupid as requiring technology that stamps every brass casing with a serial number when fired or technology that only allows the owner to fire a gun. It basically doesn't exist and is far more complicated than is functionally feasible.
Doe Hunter Biden work for the Belgians as well?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/50-bags-cocaine-seized-belgian-socialist-ministers-office-staffer-arrested
How else are kids supposed to learn about drugs.
Kids should do cocaine only with the approval of their parents with the advice of child care professionals. /jeffy
And mathematical conversions from ounces to grams?
The new Senate tax credit bill to expand child tax credits will also legalize the credits for illegal immigrants. Aside on how the credits work. If you only pay 2k in federal taxes, you will be given 1200 back in refunds as the credit is 3200. So this will pay illegals tax money for being in the country.
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/conservatives-blast-bipartisan-tax-deal-allowing-illegal-immigrants-claim-child
If we stop giving them stuff, they'll stop coming.
Most of them, yes. Some would start taking stuff by force.
It looks like a long, shitty walk. I bet the return rate would be very low if we just bussed them back to wherever their journeys began.
Looking at the population of palistine, I'm going to go with eighter the left is lying, or the isralies suck at genocide
https://tradingeconomics.com/palestine/population
The Left is lying.
((shocked!))
Hey, it's not a lie if it saves democracy!
Misek: That graph is a lie perpetrated by the Jew media.
Confidence in the Chinese economy is at its lowest ebb in decades.
I hope they don't have to sell off parts of America.
They already are:
https://sanjosespotlight.com/santa-clara-county-to-buy-hundreds-of-acres-for-conservation-richmond-ranch/
The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday unanimously voted to begin acquiring a nearly 1,500-acre portion of the 3,654-acre ranch, with the remaining space being acquired by the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency.
The Conservation Fund, a national nonprofit, purchased the land for $16 million from China-based Z&L Properties — whose co-founder and former CEO Zhang Li is under scrutiny for allegations of bribery and kickbacks…
You mean centrally planned economies are not successful long term? This is my shocked face, I mean really, shocked, it seemed to work so well in the Eastern Bloc*.
*: historical note, in the early 1950s the Eastern Bloc countries actually grew faster than the Western capitalists, such that many began to push the narrative that their central planning was superior to free markets. A lot of this was due to forced production, such as producing far more steel (using imported iron) than was being consumed (Romania and Bulgaria were both guilty of this and persisted long after it became obvious that it wasn't working). Of course when this invariably failed, as it always does, you can't mandate consumer preference or needs no matter what you do, those cheering on central planning didn't offer any mea culpas. Guess which paper 'of record' was one of the biggest cheerleaders of the so called Eastern European Miracle (hint, the also got Stalin's forced famine wrong too).
And they've also been the biggest pushers of the Chinese miracle myth too.
They can try to convince me their economic numbers are real when they let the Yuan trade freely on international currency exchanges. Not before.
The thing that gets me if is everyone knows the Chinese are lying yet they don't invest like they know they're lying. Case in point, just about everyone knows China's claim of having 7 years worth of small grains and corn stockpiled is bullshit (oh they might have it but it hasn't been stored properly and is likely way to spoiled to be used even for animal feed) yet the commodity brokers still react every time China threatens 'to release' their stockpiles which drives down prices, and then China buys grain futures at the depressed prices. Because the other thing is China hasn't connected it's grain growing Northwest region to its eastern provinces where it's needed or can be shipped, therefore China is reliant on North American and Australian grains to feed the majority of its population. The government keeps buying the grain from the farmers, piling it into huge open air grain piles, where it sits and rots and then imports the grain it needs to feed its people.
...or want to see a particular guest or topic covered.
Every third episode should be covid mitigation policy reviews.
That seems to be the new motto for the DNC-academia-government-media-infotainment complex.
should switch to COVID policy mitigation
If you can't read twitter you should create a fake email to read this documented twitter thread.
https://twitter.com/Millie__Weaver/status/1750169687751585884
It shows collusion between activists and federal workers to effect the 2020 election. Below some of the content. It is long.
==
Thread:
1.
Far-Left US Government Employees Conspired To Subvert President Trump, Gum Up Bureaucratic Processes, Strike, and Leak To The Media
A network of radical marxist bureaucrats conspired in secret meetings, plotting how to use their official positions inside the US Government to enact their political agenda.
Millie Weaver
@Millie__Weaver
·
Jan 24
4. Participants backgrounds ranged from being far-left protest organizers, green energy corporate employees to federal bureaucrats, Air Force Lt. Col., National Security advisors, and those who worked in White House during the Obama Administration.
5. Secrecy
"What's learned in the room can leave with you, but what is said in the room stays in the room."
Participants are advised to "take those discussions offline" if they what to talk about high risk actions they want to take.
7. The Election Is At Risk
"..there will likely be disagreements about which ballots should be thrown away and for what reason"
8. Thwarting A Coup Isn't A Coup
"It is not a coup to act against a government or officials who are trying to prevent a legitimate transfer of power. We believe that every vote must count, we must count every vote"
9. We Have Power & Responsibility
"We have power and responsibility as federal workers... rules have meaning because we decide they do, we decide to enforce them." - Maddy Salzman
These people are not serving us.
Sounds like they were planning a coup.
Insurrection!
Not if you wear a Resist! T-shirt.
Think they were admitting to one. They also did with all those friendly interviews between corporate media and The Resistance.
The actual coup began on November 3.
Sounds like they were planning a coup.
No question, although they seem to consider it a "counter-coup" in the event Trump lost, but refused to peacefully transfer power.
I didn't see any reference to a plan if Trump legitimately won, but I suppose there's no difference. Everybody believes what they want to believe.
More here for the Twitter impaired.
https://www.millennialmillie.com/post/far-left-us-government-employees-conspired-to-subvert-president-trump-gum-up-bureaucratic-processes
Thanks, not Twitter impaired but I refuse to use their services.
They discuss on having the power to decide what the rules were and what ballots would count.
They discuss on having the power to decide what the rules were and what ballots would count.
But they don't. They are federal employees and the vote happens at local/state levels. What am I missing? Or are they just delusional?
I didn’t see any reference to a plan if Trump legitimately won,
Well, like Hillary, that was not considered to be a possible outcome so why plan for it.
Good point
" We believe that every vote must count, we must count every vote”"
Hell, we'll count each vote twice because they are just that important!
And we'll even count votes that were not cast so those people don't miss out.
Sounds like another red scare is in order. Seems like these people are openly admitting to actually undermining democracy, and the country as well.
Its been far too long since the days of beating commies, time to resume
It's important to note that the left deems it a "scare" as a well-poisoning tactic to misdirect people from noticing that an institution is being subverted by marxist evangelicals.
"left deems it a “scare” as a well-poisoning tactic"
its the same thing they do with 'moral panic' now.
Listen, during a sacred revolution there is no worse sinner than a counter-revolutionary.
From CNN--in 2016, emphasis mine:
"What began in the universities of Beijing soon spread to wider society, with Mao personally writing a big-character poster entitled “Bombard the Headquarters” calling for an attack on the “command center of counter-revolution.”
“He pretty much asked the people to attack the Party, which we’ve never seen before or since,” says Dikotter.
“Stalin, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Un, none of them would ever think of asking ordinary people to attack the very machinery they themselves built up.”
If you can’t read twitter you should create a fake email to read this documented twitter thread.
Nope. If it is so important somone will write it up in a format I can read. Fuck Twitter.
Congressional staff are increasingly challenging their own bosses in a bid to shift the balance of power on Capitol Hill...
Ha. Hiring from the last crop of ivy league whiners after encouraging them to indulge their inner infant is finally coming home to roost.
Is this happening on both sides of the aisle?
Hey nothing "those people" do is newsworthy. Except when they threaten good people.
The ACLU's recent settlement with the NYPD requires that when a protest "temporarily blocks vehicular or pedestrian traffic or otherwise obstructs public streets or sidewalks, the NYPD shall whenever possible accommodate the demonstration"
Unless the protest is for gun rights or anything to do with COVID "mitigation" policy.
This is how street-obstructing demonstrations should be accomodated.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1748691282069799298
Shield wall.
Hold the wall, hold the wall. They just needed the second sow to be armed with spears and Danes-Axes to make it really good.*
A Danes-Axe was a Scandinavian battle-ax with a six foot long heft, employed by the warriors in the second and third row of the shield wall to strike over the heads of their first line and attack the opponents first line from above.
The also had a slightly larger and heavier head so more weight behind the swing when attacking in a downward motion.
The Italian police didn't do such a great job maintaining their wall, but the protestors broke first so I guess it didn't really matter. BTW, we were taught similar crowd control methods in base defense classes while I was in the service. The Phalanx or Shield Wall is still very effective in such situations.
And the Phalanx CIWS is even better. Nothing breaks up a crowd like 4500 rpm of 20 mm rounds. Except maybe a GAU-8 Avenger. A-10 goes brrrrrt.
I see edit isn't working again.
I bet a lot of protestors here blocking streets would be a hell of a lot more likely to stay on the sidewalk and off the freeway if they were ever prosecuted and put in jail.
But, nothing ever happens. Ever. Burn a federal building in Portland, night after night, and nobody goes to jail. Block a major freeway or a bridge to a city so tens of thousands of people are trapped in traffic, nothing happens to them.
Sit in a cell with a J6 protestor. Then let's see if you'll exercise your civil rights more civilly.
Then that suggests that the people whose rights to travel unimpeded by other's should accommodate the "mostly peaeful" counterdemonstration.
One of the purposes of law enforcement in not allowing these kinds of "protest" is to prevent people being an obnoxious nuisance to everyone else from being physically harmed by the just response of the people whose rights they are violating.
It is appalling just how evil the ACLU is.
Still trying to make up for Skokie.
State Sen. Scott Wiener
Was then reminded that California needs to extract every dollar they can from every source available.
You know who else wanted to extract every dollar they could from any source...
C. Montgomery Burns and the Burns Omni-Net?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rIQ-hm0Fv4
The only problem, other than the fact that New York City taxpayers are coughing up for it, is that the city is beyond capacity, with no end in sight to the influx.
I've been assured by true libertarians in the comments there is no downside to millions of illegals coming into a country. No costs. They bring their own shelter. They bring their own jobs. All profit.
Even FRED has admitted now that debt service is now over $1 trillion.
Zerohedge showed the actual charts which revealed that it's taking about $2.50 in NEW debt to create $1.00 in GDP now. This is absolutely not sustainable, no matter how much funny money gets printed.
"They bring their own shelter. They bring their own jobs. All profit."
I need to look into these RV/Food Truck hybrid vehicles they are crossing the border in. I wonder if they have good gas mileage.
All electric. No pollution. Environmental sustainable food sources.
And affordable prices!
there is no downside to millions of illegals coming into a country.
This is a strawman. No one here has argued this position.
Why are you and your team SO upset about illegal immigration? Why is it consistently #1 on your list of issues that you are concerned about, when there are so many other issues that are at least as concerning as this one - out of control spending, to name just one?
Why does the spending on illegal immigration cause you and your team to generate outrage far out of proportion to the monetary costs of such spending, especially in relation to the much larger spending that is consumed by native-born citizens?
Could it be that you and your team are now pot-committed to an electoral strategy of using brown people as scapegoats for your vehicle to power?
Obviously you haven't read your buddy Sarc's comments more often.
Could it be that you and your team are now pot-committed to an electoral strategy of using brown people as scapegoats for your vehicle to power?
No. And I'm generally for more immigration, not less. But why write all those questions, when you've already come to this conclusion.
Why are you and your team SO upset about illegal immigration? Why is it consistently #1 on your list of issues that you are concerned about, when there are so many other issues that are at least as concerning as this one – out of control spending, to name just one?
1. Illegal immigration is just that. Against the rules. It is inherently unfair, has an obvious negative affect on our economy, contributes to out of control spending, and eats into MY ability to use MY dollars on MYself. And, in case you hadn't noticed, it also contributes greatly to other social malice, such as the current housing issues in many states. Why are you okay with that?
Why does the spending on illegal immigration cause you and your team to generate outrage far out of proportion to the monetary costs of such spending, especially in relation to the much larger spending that is consumed by native-born citizens?
2. The native born citizens are the primary contributors to the taxes in our country. We don't go to other countries and ask them to pay for all of our needs, house us, feed us, educate our children etc. If the system is broken, fix it. Don't break it further and throw up your arms and say it is okay because we said it is. How many at your house?
I'm as pissed about spending on things like the Ukrainian war, assistance to any other country, etc. Spending American tax payer money on non citizens pisses me off, rather they are here illegally or in another country.
Liz Wolfe
@LizWolfeReason
·
Follow
Found something fucked up. THIS is how the New York Times describes Milei's deregulatory actions?
.
"Would have consequences" is bizarrely (I might even say DELIBERATELY) vague.
Wait til you hear the NYT call the guy who didn't go after enemies and had a policy of reducing regulations an authoritarian Hitler. The guy who refused to usurp powers during covid despite pleas from democrats to shut down the country.
the guy who didn’t go after enemies
Exactly, he was supposed to "lock her up" and then never followed through. But *this* time it's going to be different! All those things that never happened before, they will this time.
Seriously, the current progressive definition of a Fascist is somebody who prevents the left from imposing fascism.
ACLU to be sued for consumer fraud. Denying the civil liberty to travel unmolested creates clear cut case of false advertising.
"Congressional staff are increasingly challenging their own bosses in a bid to shift the balance of power on Capitol Hill, representing a sea change in the relationship between lawmakers and the legions of workers who ensure the House and Senate function."
Young indoctrinated marxists rising up to take power. Where have we seen this before...I wonder how long until the state sanctioned struggle sessions start
Fire them = congressional staff
I enjoy being ruled by those I haven’t voted for.
Try to sound more convincing.
Any country that's taken over by these people needs to be justifiably taken down and destroyed.
That's not hyperbole, either. It might say "United States of America" on the stationary, but that's not what it would be anymore.
I would say fire them all, but OPM is filled with the same activists and won't allow it.
Is this a democracy?
No, it's cultural syndicalism. A bunch of unelected commissars attempting to take over the government from the staffing room, in the interest of creating a communist utopia.
All the more reason for the Optimates to be taken down by the Populares.
Mao smiles down on them
I suspect he's a bit too busy getting tortured in hell to notice much of what they're doing at the moment.
Root for the Morlocks.
College sorority accused of discrimininating against women in favor of males:
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/kappa-kappa-gamma-alumnae-sue-sorority-for-subverting-its-sisterhood-mission/
"Prominent Kappa Kappa Gamma alumnae are suing their sorority, accusing the organization of a conspiracy to abandon its mission as a sisterhood in allowing the induction of a man into the University of Wyoming chapter. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, broadens the scope of a first case involving six female students who were forced to share their KKG sorority with the man."
"The plaintiffs are also reintroducing a breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim, seen in the existing litigation with the six Kappa members, alleging that KKG did not follow its own bylaws. KKG unilaterally redefined “woman” without going through the proper channels to change its bylaws to reflect that new definition, enabling the organization to rubber-stamp Langford’s membership, the first lawsuit contended.
Bypassing rules has been a repeat pattern of KKG’s leadership. The headquarters has not just sanctioned the admission of men into local chapters; the second lawsuit outlines KKG’s elevation to the organization’s leadership of another transgender-identifying man. In 2020, KKG installed Tracy Nadzieja, formerly known as “Tom” in college, into its senior leadership as a district director."
"“In addition to the facts that are already out there, this really highlights Kappa leadership’s discrimination against women in favor of men,” Mailman said. “He’s been promoted to leadership in ways that women would never have been promoted in Kappa. For an organization that is dedicated to a mission to promote women to actually discriminate against women is just a clear violation of the whole organization’s purpose.”"
"As personal legal remedies, Levang and Tuck-Smith are asking that their memberships be restored. The entire group of plaintiffs are also asking KKG to stop violating its bylaws, to remove the current members of its Fraternity Council and appoint a temporary slate of council members before the next election, and to require Kappa’s panhellenic delegate to abide by and uphold panhellenic rules that require promoting sororities as a single-sex organization."
Gotta let women into men’s locker rooms, but they don’t want trannies in their sorority.
What do these people think a woman is?
No biology majors?
That guy looks like the nurse murderer in Hitchcock's "The Unlocked Window".
"He’s been promoted to leadership in ways that women would never have been promoted in Kappa."
Diversity hires are a real bitch, huh?
A fake bitch, in this case.
Maine's legislative attack on parental rights:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/01/maine-moves-to-stifle-conventional-views-on-gender/
"LD 1735, “An Act to Safeguard Gender-affirming Health Care,” would allow Maine courts to take custody of any child from their parents if the latter disagree with “gender-affirming care” as defined by the state. That is no exaggeration — the bill text specifically says a court may take temporary custody of a child “in an emergency” if the child is present in Maine and “has been unable to obtain gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care.”
So “in an emergency” (the vagueness of this term is especially troubling), a parent of a child experiencing gender dysphoria may not have a conversation with their child, teach self-acceptance, or communicate their values if they do not believe that a sex change is the only answer. If they exercise their First Amendment rights in this way, they could lose custody of their children.
And “gender-affirming care” is broadly defined. The bill text repeatedly states that whether or not such care is warranted is up to the child in question, and it explicitly includes hormone treatments, mastectomies, and castration as protected procedures. The bill would also make Maine a safe haven for minors to come receive sex changes if they hail from one of the states that have begun to restrict such procedures for the underaged. Courts and officers of the law would be barred from reuniting kidnapped children with their legal guardians if the children came to Maine for gender-affirming care against their guardians’ wishes.
“It undermines the law in other states and legalizes kidnapping,” state representative Katrina Smith, an opponent of the legislation, told me. “A child could jump on a bus and come to Maine with any stranger they meet online who tells them, ‘Trust me, not your parents.’”"
I’m waiting for the legislation that allows kids to smoke cigarettes or pot, drink alcohol, snort coke, buy AR-15s, marry, drive, etc. if they’re adult enough to know for sure they want to do one life changing thing, why not all?
Do they want to lower the age of consent to 13?
Or is 13 too old for these dreckvolk?
It's too old for Pluggo. Make what you want of that.
From "it takes a village" to "the village takes your kid" did not take long.
Do you think progressive retards, unable to reproduce biologically due to dysfunctional trans pseudo-genitals or angst over multiple existential global doom scenarios, have developed a deliberate plan to brainwash kids produced by others?
Weird they would call it "gender affirming" when it is an attempt to change (deny) one's natural gender.
Weird they would call it "care" when it's unnecessary and potentially dangerous.
'Earlier this week, Canada's finance minister said the government will appeal a court ruling that declared unreasonable its use of emergency powers to shut down the Canadian trucker COVID-19 mandate protests in 2022.'
Quelle surprise. An authoritarian government is unhappy about a challenge to its authority.
'"Five participants in the TED fellows program, which supports and promotes emerging voices in a variety of fields across the globe, resigned Wednesday after the public-speaking organization invited hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman and journalist Bari Weiss to speak at its 2024 flagship conference in Vancouver," reports National Review.'
What do you call the resignation of five TED fellows?
A - A good start.
B - A missed opportunity for getting out the wood chipper.
C - Is TED still a thing?
D - The vanguard of the new organization, TEDjazeera, that will convene its first conference in Gaza.
Is there an E: All of the above option here? 🙂
Ackman is now considered anti-semitic for trying to penalize people financially for their anti-semitism.
'It remains to be seen whether TED will kowtow to the haters. But it's a very bad sign when people ostensibly affiliated with the organization due to their intellectual rigor and nuance end up showing such profound incuriousness, and want to dissociate from those with whom they disagree.'
"Intellectual rigor and nuance"? More like superiority complex and techy-progressive privilege. Does it make more sense now?
"Young Congress Aides Publicly Defy Bosses, Upending Tradition"
Answer from Glengarry Glen Ross -
They asked me for a favor. I said the real favor, follow my advice and fire your fucking ass, because a loser is a loser.
'The city has a law on the books, called right-to-shelter, that forces it to provide emergency housing for those in need—frequently homeless people, but now also newly-arrived migrants. The only problem, other than the fact that New York City taxpayers are coughing up for it, is that the city is beyond capacity, with no end in sight to the influx.'
Well, then, NYC just needs another law. This one will state that positive rights shall not be impeded by physical reality.
The left: You have a right to a Pony
The Right: There's only 5 Ponies and they're all taken.
The left: *thinks* Put them on a waiting list!
Libertarians: Eliminate Trump tariffs and repeal the Jones Act so we can have more Ponies!
Libertarian Transhumanist: And vat-breed moar ponies.
🙂
😉
They could fire all the government workers and open up the government offices as shelters.
You had me at "fire all the government workers...."
"The Legal Aid Society, which monitors the city's compliance with the right-to-shelter mandate, said on Monday that it had been told by the city that on any given night, 800 to 1,000 migrants are left on the waiting list, and that the average wait for a bed is more than eight days," reports The New York Times."
Another reality check that positive rights are not rights at all and any attempt to codify them into law is a fool's errand.
'A bill by State Sen. Scott Wiener would require new cars to have tech that would stop them from going more than 10 mph over the speed limit.'
Tell you what. I will consider accepting this only after Wiener and colleagues pass a law that would stop government from going 10 mph over Constitutional and budget limits.
The vote of the US judge, Joan Donaghue, in the ICJ against Israel is a moral disgrace.
It was pretty amusing seeing the ICJ ignore the 10 7 atrocities. And the continued attacks on Israel woth rockets from Hamas. All while pro Palestine protestors outside the venue chanted river to the sea to support genocide.
It is a moral obscenity. Hamas has publicly thanked the ICJ.
'Xi Jinping is in trouble, reports Bloomberg: "Confidence in the Chinese economy is at its lowest ebb in decades."'
Poor Hunter.
'Congressional staff are increasingly challenging their own bosses in a bid to shift the balance of power on Capitol Hill, representing a sea change in the relationship between lawmakers and the legions of workers who ensure the House and Senate function.'
Is this a democracy? Sure. And so is North Korea.
Staffers are supposed to do what they are told. They de jure have no claim to any authority. They are minions. The idea that "changing the balance of power" is to render the idea of representative democracy meaningless if all you are doing is changing figureheads for an entrenched legislative bureaucracy.
Hey, but if all staffers on the Hill get to vote in the House and Senate we can be more democracy-er.
“Is this a democracy? Sure. And so is North Korea.”
You mean the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea? Otherwise known as Best Korea? You bet your ass! It’s right there in the name!
Appealing emergency powers ruling: Earlier this week, Canada's finance minister said the government will appeal a court ruling that declared unreasonable its use of emergency powers to shut down the Canadian trucker COVID-19 mandate protests in 2022.
By the way, that was MAJOR news. Assuming the courts hold this up, that would (I assume, but I'm no lawyer, let alone an expert in Canadian law) probably invalidate all kinds of subsequent actions the government took, like seizing bank accounts, prosecutions etc. Because all of that was predicated off the emergency.
It seems like government should be able to clear the streets without freezing anyone's bank account.
San Francisco: At least it's not Oakland.
"Kaiser directs employees to stay in Oakland HQ for lunch over crime concerns"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JV5XK7dCPPE
to arrest protesters and freeze their bank accounts (which they then countered by using bitcoin to buy basic necessities)
Yeah, don't overplay the bitcoin hand here. Zero of those people who had their bank accounts seized were able to continue to easily navigate public financial life after that account was seized. That statement makes it look like they just seamlessly transitioned to Libertopia once the government intervened. That was a real hardship. Ability to pay mortgages, rent, buy groceries, fill your tank up with gas... all of that was effectively turned off. Coordinating specialized purchases during a brief time by using bitcoin (which you can only acquire by spending $$ unless they're donated to you or you mine them) is not much relief when your bank account has been shut.
No but at least the free market provided what alternative it could to authoritarian government laws. Bitcoin deserves to be lauded for that and free marketers are wise to point that out as a counter narrative to the communist obscene profits vision.
And a Fed-issued crypto-dollar would be even easier to shut off.
"The Legal Aid Society, which monitors the city's compliance with the right-to-shelter mandate, said on Monday that it had been told by the city that on any given night, 800 to 1,000 migrants are left on the waiting list, and that the average wait for a bed is more than eight days," reports The New York Times.
Hey liberals, think of it as the single-payer healthcare debate of the 1990s and early Obama years. All the government does is guarantee you access. They're on the waiting list, so they have access. There's no guarantee you'll ever get healthcare.
>No nuance contained within, about how the Israel-Palestine conflict is, uh, fairly complicated.
Its actually not complicated. Not complicated at all.
1. No, most Jews in Israel are not post-WW2 immigrants from Europe.
2. In fact, most of the Israelis are from populations that a) were always there or b) fled Arab genocides in the late '40's and '50's.
3. The Palestinians support Hamas and the *Palestinian* end-goal is the *extermination* of Jews. The Palestinians have been perpetrating a genocide for decades now - they're just not very good at it;)
4. Gaza has never been an 'open-air prison' (ask the Jews in Iraq about that - oh wait, you can't anymore) and its been ruled by Hamas for over a decade.
"2. In fact, most of the Israelis are from populations that a) were always there or b) fled Arab genocides in the late ’40’s and ’50’s."
The fact that most Israelis have always lived in the Middle East flummoxes so many people when I debate them about this. Somehow the narrative that all Israelis are European colonialists was baked in.
Well, most people are idiots. That makes it hard to have real discussions with them that are constructive or instructive.
Israel also wasn't "occupying" Gaza, for the past 18 years.
But they will be now, thanks to Hamas.
>is that the city is beyond capacity, with no end in sight to the influx.
Hunh. I wonder how that happened. Probably Trump's fault.
Trump refused to build a big beautiful wall...
Well he is/was a NYC developer who gave support to NYC dems like Eliot Spitzer, Andrew Cuomo...well over 300k to Dem NY politicians over the years. Just sayn.
When your name's 'Weiner' you can't help but to be a dick.
He's just trying to be cocky.
"Well, I don't like cocky. Boo cocky!"
-Peter Griffin
He'll go soft, as soon as he sees the budget.
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/xkUZsPABYUs/m/OQHEo7UaAAAJ
America’s elites live in a world of their own
The real ‘1 percent’ aren’t the superrich but those with influence,
access, and a graduate degree.
By Jeff Jacoby Globe Columnist,Updated January 24, 2024, 3:00 a.m.
A woman held up a flag during a Donald Trump campaign rally at the
Rochester Opera House on Jan. 21, in Rochester, N.H. In an independent
survey, 70 percent of "elites" surveyed expressed confidence that
government officials will do the right thing most of the time, while
less than 25 percent of the general public has that kind of trust.
A woman held up a flag during a Donald Trump campaign rally at the
Rochester Opera House on Jan. 21, in Rochester, N.H. In an independent
survey, 70 percent of "elites" surveyed expressed confidence that
government officials will do the right thing most of the time, while
less than 25 percent of the general public has that kind of trust.CHIP
SOMODEVILLA/GETTY
Consider a few questions:
In America today, is there too much individual freedom or too much
government control?
To curb climate change, should gas, meat, and electricity be strictly
rationed?
Are your personal finances getting better or worse?
Can government be trusted to do the right thing most of the time?
Those were among the queries asked in a series of opinion surveys last
year by Scott Rasmussen, a longtime independent pollster not affiliated
with any candidate. Rasmussen was testing a phenomenon he had detected
over months of conducting nationwide polls. “I consistently noticed that
three groups held views that were different from most voters,” he told
me this week. “People with a postgraduate degree, people who lived in
densely populated urban areas, and people who made more than $150,000 a
year.”
Advertisement
In a standard poll of 1,000 adults, only about 10 respondents, or 1
percent, met those criteria. That’s too few from which to draw a
statistically significant conclusion. So last fall Rasmussen conducted
full-scale surveys of respondents meeting those conditions — a group he
calls “elites” — and sure enough, the pattern he had sensed emerged
full-blown. The views of elites weren’t just slightly out of sync with
those of the population at large. They were dramatically different.
In Rasmussen’s general surveys, about 16 percent of respondents said
there is too much individual freedom, while 57 percent said there is too
much government control. But among the polled elites, three times as
many (47 percent) believed there is too much freedom. Just 1 in 5
responded that there is too much control.
Strict rationing of gas, meat, and electricity? In broad-based surveys,
63 percent opposed rationing and 28 percent approved. When elites were
surveyed, on the other hand, the results flipped: Fully 77 percent
favored rationing, while only 22 percent said they were opposed.
Advertisement
Personal financial circumstances? Of the elite respondents, an
overwhelming 74 percent reported that their finances are getting better.
When the question was put to a cross section of the public, by contrast,
just 20 percent believed they were better off.
As for trust in government, 70 percent of elites surveyed expressed
confidence that government officials will do the right thing most of the
time. Yet among the general public, surveys have shown for years that
less than 25 percent has that kind of trust.
“We haven’t had a majority of voters trust the government most of the
time since Richard Nixon was in office,” Rasmussen told me. The reason
elites are so much more confident, he speculates, is that government
ranks are staffed disproportionately by men and women like themselves.
“A lot of people on the outside like to think there’s a conspiracy,” he
said. “It’s actually more like a fraternity.” Indeed, roughly half of
the elites in his surveys graduated from one of just 12 prominent
universities — the eight Ivy League colleges, Northwestern, Duke,
Stanford, and the University of Chicago.
Unlike more conventional descriptions of the “1 percent,” Rasmussen
doesn’t focus on the superrich. The key to elite status isn’t great
wealth; it is influence and access to the powerful. “This group may not
be the wealthiest,” he observed. “But they lead government agencies,
they are active in the media, they get involved in the political
process, and most of them happen to share a certain worldview.”
Advertisement
That worldview skews left: More than 70 percent of elites surveyed
identified themselves as Democrats. But even the small minority of
self-identified Republicans tended to embrace attitudes and opinions
quite different from those of the general public.
Rasmussen is quantifying a phenomenon that is as old as American
politics itself — a sense that there are two Americas: one well-off,
well-educated, and well-connected, the other less privileged and less
protected. William F. Buckley Jr. famously captured that sentiment when
he wrote in 1963: “I should sooner live in a society governed by the
first 2,000 names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society
governed by the 2,000 faculty members of Harvard University.” That was
not because he doubted the “brainpower” of the Harvard faculty, Buckley
added, but because he recoiled from their “intellectual arrogance.”
Decades later, Rasmussen’s data suggest that the arrogance of such
elites remains entrenched. In America they see a nation where people
have too much freedom and should be told what to do by a government that
knows best. Recounting a presentation he gave at Harvard a dozen years
ago, Rasmussen tells me he has never forgotten one faculty member who
demanded in exasperation: “Why won’t Americans let us lead? It’s what we
were trained to do.” You don’t have to scrutinize poll numbers to
recognize the impact of that attitude on America’s civic life. Too many
elites look down on their fellow citizens, and an awful lot of their
fellow citizens return the favor.
A woman held up a flag during a Donald Trump campaign rally at the
Rochester Opera House on Jan. 21, in Rochester, N.H. In an independent
survey, 70 percent of “elites” surveyed expressed confidence that
government officials will do the right thing most of the time, while
less than 25 percent of the general public has that kind of trust.
FYI, this is a simple calculus, and Victor Davis Hanson has been one of the better people detailing this reality. One of the things that sets the "elites" apart from "the rest of us" is that the elites don't have to live with the consequences of their policies. The rest of us do. When you start to look at it in those terms, it begins to make complete sense as to why 70% of "elites" (as they're reasonably defined here) would believe that the policies and politicians implementing them are "the right thing to do" and only 25% of the people stuck with them think the same.
Who knew that our betters were that much better?
And of course why bother struggling to attain and keep elite status if you can't enjoy telling others how to live?
If they keep fucking things up, they will have to live with those consequences. Very few, if any, of the elites produce anything of true value. If their shit policies crash things, the rest of us pissants will be way more self-sustaining than the ones that truly believe electricity doesn't come primarily from coal and nat gas. There aren't enough urban gardens to feed NY, and they sure as hell don't have natural resources to produce any of the stuff to live a modern lifestyle.
That's what I've seen in these surveys as well. Nice to see someone break it out better.
Which means, to fight them, one needs to get involved in the process. Not an easy task, but it can be done.
This is the majority of the GOPe. They're at the same universities and cocktail parties, and only differ in how fast to smack the brick wall: 40 mph instead of 100 mph.
If Congresslizards had balls they'd throw a couple in jail 'for interefering in our precious democracy'. Do your fucking job intern.
"Have you ever wondered why empty storefronts in major cities stay empty for so long?" asks Tyler Cowen over at Marginal Revolution, linking to a new paper on "high-rent blight."
So couple of things on this... the first thing is, "No, I HAVEN'T wondered why storefronts in [my city] remain vacant so long, I know why they're empty. Starting in 2012, the retail cores started to look more like Zombieland, than a retail core.
Second, while Mr. Cowen may be an interesting guy, I read the linked bit, and it sounded like a classic case of overintellectualizing something that's really quite simple, and the economic lesson can be taken from The Lone Biker of the Apocalypse: Price, it's not what you say it is, it's what the market will bear.
Sure, there may be all kinds of Financial Whackbat reasons in the background as to why the property owners don't lower the price, but the empty storefronts simply means that "$900 a square foot" for a retail space isn't the price. That's the price THEY set, but it's not the price. Because the market isn't bearing it.
In my pedestrian estimation, commercial real estate prices lag market conditions-- retail lease prices do not reflect what you see with your eyes. I should also add that the lag, such as it is, is mostly one way. Ie, when market conditions go down, commercial rents remain stubbornly sticky. But when things get better, rents are very quick to rise. And this probably just reflects human nature's tendency to be eager to make more money, and be reluctant to make concessions for less.
For those of us that live in these major cities, what we see with our eyes is Homeless Zombies, smash and grabs, garbage, graffiti and general decay. That doesn't seem to be reflected in commercial rents.
In my city the city connected developer that owns a large percentage of the property downtown makes more from the city and bears no risk of damage for not renting than he would for renting at market rate.
Just see Louis Rossman And his YouTube videos of New York City. They are gonna crash hard. No one can lower the rent as the banks who hold the loans have at higher value than anything approaching reasonable. A house of cards that will fall.
Anyone want to buy some NY City real estate?
Is there a bridge available?
Weird, usually if the price for something is too high to find any buyers, the price has to drop.
Romney: ‘Appalling’ Trump wants to kill border bill so he can ‘blame Biden’
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4429211-romney-trump-border-bill-biden/
Romney = patriot
Fatass Donnie = hates America but loves Trump
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Why do you want open borders, Sevo?
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
How badly does turd lie? How about conflating an unarmed murder victim with terrorists?
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2
April.20.2021 at 10:47 pm
“Ashli Babbitt attacked the USA much like the 9/11 hijackers did.”
I'm proud of that quote, Sevo.
The 9/11 attack was a dark day for the USA. So was Jan 6.
And you equate the two? You surely are the dumbest, most retarded motherfucker here.
Yes, I do.
Not in damage inflicted on this country.
But in motive? Yes, no question.
Fascist fuck.
Why do you hate elections? Why do you reject the notion of "We the People"?
You are the fascist.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Malevolent retard. It takes a Nazi to compare legitimate political protest in which only the protesters died, to the murder of thousands.
turd certainly is dishonest, but he's got a heaping helping of stupid to go with his dishonesty. Stupid, lying, despicable pile of shit and proud to be!
I'll add that to Pluggo's ignominious resume.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit, a sadistic asshole and a pederast besides.
I see the ActBlue email went out late today.
citing Romney would fail a 7th grade research paper.
"Romney = patriot"
Pluggo loves him some Pierre Delecto, but is somehow still insisting that somehow he isn't a neocon.
The border bill is piece of shit the way it's set up currently.
Enough with the Ukraine funding. End that fucking war PDQ.
Vlad thanks you and Donnie for the blowjobs.
Neocon hicklib pederast shriek for the warmongering.
I would prefer Russia and Hamas end their attacks today.
Until that happens Ukraine and Israel should fight back.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Nobody said Israel and the Ukraine shouldn't fight back, just not on the taxpayers dime or spilling American blood like you want, Neocon weasel.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
So you like more dead Ukrainians? I'll add sadist to your misogyny, racism, bigotry, homophobia, and just pain asinine retarded stupidity.
"Here's a bill with border stuff on it! Just like you wanted!"
"Great!"
"Oh, we also included stuff for Ukraine for some reason, but that should be fine."
"What? No, just do border stuff!"
"YOU'RE RUINING OUR DEMOCRACY! INDICT!"
Yeah, that bitchass will always use Trump as a scapegoat for his own sellout instincts.
Legalizing 1.8M illegal immigrants a year doesn't fix the problem retard. Joe has taken 64 actions to open the border since taking office. If he reverted even his first week border EOs and enforced current laws, the crisis would end.
Oh cut the shit.
It is Donnie's only legit issue to run on.
And the fat fuck failed 2017-2020 to get anything done. The wall was always a lie.
Donnie needs this issue to demagogue.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDZS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
Joe has taken 64 actions to open the border since taking office.
and Jesse knows this because The Federalist (aka "straight news") and Just The News (you know it's straight news because it's right there in the name, right?) told him so.
What are these 64 actions, Jesse? How were they counted? Were they counted in a, say, deceptive way to exaggerate the border problem in order to push a "Biden Border Crisis" narrative?
And why has Team Red decided THIS is the issue that they are going to stake their entire electoral future on?
“….. exaggerate the border problem….”
Lol. You must be kidding. I guess mayor Adams is full of shit too.
Idiot.
How do you think you and your team can "secure the border" by using more laws and more military and more police presence? The migrants will just find a way around whatever the latest restriction is.
You have to admit reality and realize that the War On Migration is fundamentally no different than the War On Drugs - it is unwinnable, and in trying to pursue it, winds up harming the liberties of everyone involved, including citizens.
Seemed to have worked just fine in the 1920s.
And I note you proffer up yet another false dilemma.
Yeah, the whole, it won't stop everyone, some will still find a way in, isn't really an argument to not enforce the border. Not enforcements means everyone gets in. Enforcement means only a small minority gets in illegally. Much easier to deal with a small number of criminals rather than 7-10 million that have crossed illegally under Biden. And yes, before some bleeding heart cries about it, they entered the country illegally therefore they are criminals. Rather that hurts your feelings or not is beside the point. Don't want to be labeled a criminal, don't break the law.
What happened to 'there are no negatives to unrestricted immigration'?
Reality?
Facts?
I'm losing sleep about the guy who's name I will know
They started showing up in New York City.
>>Congressional staff are increasingly challenging their own bosses in a bid to shift the balance of power on Capitol Hill
lol so genZ doesn't want to wait its turn too fucking bad
>>Xi Jinping is in trouble, reports Bloomberg:
I'd say Taiwan is in bigger trouble.
If there is Big Trouble in Little China, just remember what ol' Jack Burton does when the earth quakes, and the poison arrows fall from the sky, and the pillars of Heaven shake. Yeah, Jack Burton just looks that big ol' storm right square in the eye and he says, "Give me your best shot, pal. I can take it."
pretty sure my ticket stub to that is in a box of tickets stubs I still have
Not a chance. Any attempted invasion would destroy the value of acquiring Taiwan, and would most likely fail. An amphibious invasion across 50 miles of open sea would be much tougher to pull off than just rolling tanks across open prairie as in Ukraine, and even that was not successful against modern weaponry.
And the Chinese economy, like that of the Soviet Union, is based on an unworkable theory of central control and maintained by centralized propaganda. It's going down, hard.
even better.
>>Latest Just Asking Questions just dropped
ya did you guys talk about Texas and our idiot SC or are you muzzled too?
>>Appealing emergency powers ruling:
is there recompensation for the truckers if the appeal is denied or is Canada just being dicks to have the last say?
>>"Almost anything that is considered a big deal in Hollywood gets discussed, and treated, as if it is a big deal for America,"
is Geraghty's piece titled Barbie: #metoo??
also muchas gracias for another fun week. I appreciate the forum.
It stills saddens me (but no longer amazes me) that not a single red state, let alone a republican in the national legislature, has introduced a law severely restricting when "emergency" declarations can be issued and how long they can last.
As openers, anything not affirmed by the legislature within 14 calendar days should lapse, and no repeats allowed.
https://twitter.com/EconTalker/status/1750536908495601949
Yes, what you're paid is less than what you produce. But if the employer contributes nothing you don't need an employer--you can just make widgets yourself and sell them. So the employer contributes something--capital, equipment, insights, or else you'd quit and do it yourself.
SE Cupp: Tim Scott is an example of Trump's emasculation of the GOP
https://www.cnn.com/videos/opinions/2024/01/25/se-cupp-unfiltered-trump-endorsements-contd.cnn
SE Cupp is a conservative commentator who is ashamed of Tim Scott's groveling 'Happy slave" act concerning Donnie. It is truly shameful.
Thank you SE. And you have a nice rack.
1. SE Cup is hardly a conservative commentator of any sort. Cup's column is a regular feature in the Chicago Sun-Times which is an unabashedly left-leaning paper (I'll give them credit for being honest about the lean).
2. You really do have an infatuation with Tim Scott bordering on seriously creepy (instead of just plain creepy). You got some sort of man-crush on him, hoping he'll use his BBC on you?
Tim Scott seems to be too old for him.
You’re probably right since she strongly favors small government. Can’t call her a conservative anymore.
I like her. She is not a fundie nut.
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"Tim Scott’s groveling ‘Happy slave” act"
A small part of Buttplug's racist tirades against black Republicans:
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2 28 mins ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Groveling like a shoe-shine boy, Tim Scott humiliates himself for Fatass Donnie.
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2 3 mins ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Uncle Clarence has had his hand out for over 20 years.
GIMME DAT WHITIE MONEY!
That fucking cop lover.
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2 19 mins ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Sandy, I had a genuine fear that a Senator Walker would be shucking and jiving us good liberty-loving Georgians every day.
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2 1 hour ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Many have asked for an update to the Buttplug Horse Race:
Tim Scott 400-1 Whuffo Bro? Whuffo is you in dis race fo, bro?
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2 2 hours ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Dude, I am from the South. You can’t troll me on race.
Do you remember Spermin’ Herman Cain? He sounded like a slave extra from Song of the South.
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2 1 hour ago
Flag Comment Mute User
No, you’re a fucking snowflake who only gets offended when one of your Lawn Jockeys is criticized.
What do you think about "Trump’s emasculation of the GOP" as SE Cupp describes it?
Yes, those are all nice quotes you track but it seems you use them to avoid pertinent topics like "Trump’s emasculation of the GOP".
I don't expect a reply from you.
You have devolved into Sevo-like cut/paste platitudes.
Yeah, NeverTrump "conservatives" hate it when the left is being resisted.
Emily Kopp of Right to Know and Alina Chan have really done good journalism re the lab leak stuff.
Now lots of FOIA documents and great article about the 2018 grant proposal to reengineer a SARS-COV almost exactly on the lines that it turned into COVID19.
The research team that proposed this $14 million grant to DARPA is: Peter Daszak – Ecohealth Alliance Prof Baric – Univ of North Carolina Prof Wang – Duke/NUS Singapore Dr Shi – Wuhan Institute Dr Rocke – USGS Wildlife Health Center Dr Unidad – Palo Alto Research Center
DARPA turned this grant down for ‘safety’ reasons – but this team had already lied to govt about the biosafety lab work being done at UNC instead of in Wuhan to save money.
I don’t understand the biology here but its easy for me to see the cui bono of who among DARPA and PARC associated companies might benefit from funding – on the cheap – engineering of viruses (just like SARS-COV2) that are “a clear-and-present danger of a new SARS-like pandemic.” And that list is —– Moderna – who got many of their vaccine patents from the DARPA ADEPT program in 2011 and the P3 program in 2016.
The bad guys in these documents appear to me to be Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance (who was selected to be the American WHO rep on the visit to China to
uncovercover up the origins) and Baric of UNC (who would have subcontracted more to Wuhan to save money).Prof Wang – Duke/NUS Singapore
You forgot Prof Sum Ting Wong.
(the airliner fake news crew made it back this week)
How much of a dumbass are you, Shrike? Just when I thought you couldn't get any more racist nor stupid, you continue to amaze me.
I DON'T DO WOKE, PAL!
The asshole turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
But you definitely do deranged.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Prof Wang – Duke/NUS Singapore
Please try to be more Woke next time.
You prefer the wikipedia entry for Linfa Wang?
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Rand Paul is talking about the same stuff in his recent book (Deception, which I'm in the middle of). All of those characters appear as well as Fauci. Fauci seems to be the central person to this gain-of-function research.
Fauci is not the center of this. Nor is China. Fauci certainly knows everyone and has enough ‘experience’ to help cover things up when the kettle starts to explode. Which he did in sending Daszak on that WHO trip to Wuhan. But he’s not the center of anything specific here.
Rand Paul has spent WAY too much effort trying to make this political. Or maybe he understands that a cover up is worse than the original clusterfuck. He’s seen the info for a long time – and knows how to read scientific papers (which is a serious skill).
Usually the coverup is worse than the actual crime, see: Watergate.
In politics, the cover up is more likely to be exposed than the crime. But it ain't worse.
Depends. If I murder someone to coverup an affair, I would say the coverup is far worse than the crime. And adultery is technically illegal in most states.
Trump Calls 'Truly Weird' Rand Paul a 'Spoiled Brat' Without a Brain
Paul's effort to brand Trump a "fake conservative" earns angry Twitter tirade from "Trump," who has begun putting his own name in scare quotes.
https://reason.com/2015/08/11/donald-trump-calls-truly-weird-rand-paul/
The ass-clown of the commentariat turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Why do you hate Rand Paul, Sevo?
It's from 2015, dipshit.
was there still SBP1 then?
It's an ENB article so that should tell you something off the bat. And yes, he's in that comment section as "Palin's Buttplug". He sounds just as stupid there as he does here.
Example: https://reason.com/2015/08/11/donald-trump-calls-truly-weird-rand-paul/?comments=true#comment-5507367
Yep.
https://reason.com/2015/08/11/donald-trump-calls-truly-weird-rand-paul/?comments=true#comment-5507367
And his handle still linked to soros.org.
^^ gracias both. don't think I was commenting yet 8/15 but I was lurking once in awhile & remember thinking "gross" about the handle lol
Hugh Akston 8 years ago
Rand has clearly not read his Sun Tzu: “When you enter battle with a clown, you have already lost.”
Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper 8 years ago
+1 red nose
straffinrun 8 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
“When you’re at the circus, go up to the biggest clown and kick him in the nuts.” Circus, Prison…whatever.
Anomalous 8 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
+1 ICP
Kristen Bids No Trump 8 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
I should have read his stuff when I was in a relationship with a drunk.
Better posters then.
The only clown here is you, malicious retard.
turd certainly is dishonest, but he’s got a heaping helping of stupid to go with his dishonesty. Stupid, lying, despicable steaming pile of lefty shit and proud to be!
The bad guys in these documents appear to me to be Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance
My crazypants alt-right, Trumpy, racist, white supremacist, perennially-banned/flagged-on-youtube, anti-vaxxer *continues to think of every invective thrown at the no-shit scientists and well-respected-up-until-~2020 researchers* timeline pegged Ecohealth Alliance as the bad guys more than two years ago.
Good lord. This entire page is a toxic mess of right-wing nuttery.
Where is the libertarian take here? Where is the focus on liberty, and not merely "pwning the libs" or some crap?
I guess it would all look like it's from the right-wing if you're from the left of Pol Pot, Jeffy.
You and your team is in looney tunes crazytown. Even Ted Cruz would say that you all are nuts.
Then why do you even bother to come here, moron? You obviously aren't a libertarian, not really radical, nor are you an individualist.
He's the Holy Roman Empire of the comment section. Where it was neither holy, nor Roman nor an empire, he's neither a libertarian, nor an individualist, nor radical.
So many of you seem overly focused on "the elites". Do you really think that "the people" would do a better job at protecting your liberties than "the elites"? Really?
"The people" as a whole are easily swayed by demagogues and appeals to emotion, and would not hesitate to strip the liberties away from people who deviate too far from what is considered "normal".
"The elites" are literally baked into the structure of the US government itself. The Federalist Papers warned against succumbing to "the passions of the mob" and so that is why the power of "the people" to have direct influence over government policy was diluted and put in the hands of representatives, i.e., "elites", instead of giving the people a direct vote in much of anything. Remember that the Founding Fathers deliberately constructed a system in which the voting public was, by design, a small minority of the total population - only white male property owners. They didn't want "the people" running things. They wanted "the elites" to run things.
Jeff Jacoby explains it.
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/xkUZsPABYUs/m/OQHEo7UaAAAJ
In Rasmussen’s general surveys, about 16 percent of respondents said
there is too much individual freedom, while 57 percent said there is too
much government control. But among the polled elites, three times as
many (47 percent) believed there is too much freedom. Just 1 in 5
responded that there is too much control.
Strict rationing of gas, meat, and electricity? In broad-based surveys,
63 percent opposed rationing and 28 percent approved. When elites were
surveyed, on the other hand, the results flipped: Fully 77 percent
favored rationing, while only 22 percent said they were opposed.
Advertisement
Personal financial circumstances? Of the elite respondents, an
overwhelming 74 percent reported that their finances are getting better.
When the question was put to a cross section of the public, by contrast,
just 20 percent believed they were better off.
As for trust in government, 70 percent of elites surveyed expressed
confidence that government officials will do the right thing most of the
time. Yet among the general public, surveys have shown for years that
less than 25 percent has that kind of trust.
You're proving my point right now. What is this survey? It is a bunch of leading questions asked to rich educated urban liberals designed to provoke a reaction among "the people" about how they are not like you and don't agree with you. Well duh! They have different experiences than you. No one is supposed to agree 100% on everything. But the real problem here is the manner in which a survey like this is designed to provoke animosity towards "the elites". Not only do they believe different things, but they are "un-American" and they should be condemned for their views. There is no explanation given as to why they hold their beliefs. Maybe once we understand their reasoning we would come to understand that they are not evil people, just people with different points of view. But no, this entire exercise is just an attempt to rile up the mob against a minority group, this one labeled "the elites".
You yourself are proving why "the people" can't be trusted - they take surveys like this and use them to gin up outrage.
That's a helluva take.
1. Elites openly admit they despise others' freedoms and want to control everyone
2. regular folks disgusted and outraged by that
Therefore:
3. regular folks cant be trusted.
You're amazing dude.
Look at what passes for "news" in the comments. It's not news, it's partisan narratives full of half-truths and biased assumptions. And you all lap it up and believe it uncritically and pass it on. Now imagine if government policy were decided on the basis of nothing but opinion pieces from The Federalist. It would be a nightmare, not only because it would be a right-wing dystopia, but most importantly it would not even be grounded in reality.
To Team Red, the "border crisis" can be solved just by enforcing more laws and sending the military to the border. Really? No thought given as to how the current laws work and why just enforcing them harder isn't going to do much, how sending the military to the border would be a dangerous thing to do, and no thought about the consequences or cost-benefit analysis, especially in terms of liberty, of treating illegal immigrants as scapegoats.
Yes, we know you don't actually believe in borders. They're just "lines on a map."
That’s right, if they aren’t your approved sources, they couldn’t have any news articles.
Only 4 out of 15 states even had elections in 1792. Only 9 out 24 had elections by 1824. Which was the year that Andrew Jackson won the popular vote and the electoral college vote but JQ Adams became Prez via the House of Reps. With all four candidates from the same political party.
Can't say things have been better since then but it's pretty clear that elitist incestuousness/deals results in corrupt dead-ends.
And guess which state NEVER had a popular election until after the Civil War?
Yes - that bastion of calm composed reflection and strong adherence to rational thought - South Carolina.
I think you are misinterpreting this - or are such an idiot you think the Presidential election is the only election. The South Carolina legislature elected the Presidential electors until after the Civil War (as the Constitution allowed), but how were the legislators selected? Can you cite anything that says they weren't elected, like every other state legislature was?
Today's elites are utterly failing to protect our liberties or maintain constitutionally limited government. The problem isn't elites because they are elite. The problem is that today's elites are evil pieces of shit who are largely hostile to the idea that people even have rights except for what they deem acceptable. They openly disdain the very idea of free speech and only want democracy if it is limited to voting for candidates they deem acceptable (look at actions against Trump and Germany trying to ban whole political parties).
"TRUST THE EXPERTS HERPITY DERPITY DOOOOO!"
Goddamn, your stupid takes are so predictable I can set my watch to them.
"They mean well and you would do the same thing if you were in their position!"
I love that argument. Always seems to be what happens after people get sick of "experts" fucking us in whatever the recent progressive fad way is.
That’s why there shouldn’t be a “their position.”
Power corrupts. As true as the sky is blue.
The whole notion that governance is a necessary evil means it is still evil. Heavily checked, limited, and by, of, and for the people are all checks against corruptible elites perpetually in power.
So many of you seem overly focused on “the elites”. Do you really think that “the people” would do a better job at protecting your liberties than “the elites”? Really?
Yes.
Agreed.
“The elites” are literally baked into the structure of the US government itself. The Federalist Papers warned against succumbing to “the passions of the mob” and so that is why the power of “the people” to have direct influence over government policy was diluted and put in the hands of representatives, i.e., “elites”,
Little story about the "elites" in the 1770s in regards to the American Experience and how it differed from other countries (at the time).
True story:
During the Revolutionary War, the French Army-- which was allied with the American Colonial Rebellion had their own encampments in the vicinity of their Colonial counterparts. Occasionally, an American Officer would wander over to the French side and make casual conversation. According to the accounts, the American officers had a tendency to break the ice with their French counterparts by asking them what they did for a living. The French officers would all look at each other in bemused silence and then break out in uproarious laughter.
In case you need it spelled out for you, the American experiment was supposed to be a country of laborers, shop keepers, tinkers, tailors etc., it was not supposed to have professional soldiers, and least of all... LEAST of all, professional politicians. To the rest of the world (at that time) the idea that a military officer or politician would have a job... other than "Military officer" or "politician" was such a bewildering, foreign concept, it was literally laughed at.
Unfortunately, militias have never really proven successful as substitutes for military anywhere they've been tried (and they've been tried lots of times). Occasionally, generally in a defensive setting, they can prove to be effective enough to win a battle but more often they're just not disciplined enough, especially on the offensive (defensive is always easier than offensive in combat). One of the big debates during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars and through much of the 19th century was which was more effective, a professional army of volunteers, or a citizens army of conscripts (it was actually the liberals and leftists who supported the latter). The British were considered the epitome of the professional volunteer model, while France the conscripted citizen model. One of the results of the British professional soldier was the ability to deploy quickly from column into line of battle, and effectively use platoon fire, whereas, especially in the Peninsula War, the French relied more on column of assault, where wait of numbers was considered the deciding factor. The British where thus able to deliver more fire (and at a faster rate) than the French, who the majority of soldiers were not able to fire (and often weren't even allowed to load their muskets) enduring heavy fire while advancing. Though generally outnumbered, the British Army was able to deliver more shots than their French counterparts. Marching in column was considered more desirable for lesser trained troops, as it is technically less arduous to learn than deploying into line of battle, and harder to run from as the mass of those around you keeps you from escaping. Of course there were situations were column was considered more desirable than line but especially on the defensive the line of battle is generally superior.
Yeah, militia have never been effective in any greater capacity than as skirmishers and guerrillas. That doesn't mean they can't be effective soldiers, but they need to be in an organized army that enforces discipline and drill on a regular basis to accomplish that.
The main reason Afghanistan is such a pain in the ass to occupy is because those tribal militias understand that an organized foreign power simply can't enforce rule in that terrain and environment for very long. But they're pretty fucking helpless when those nations decide to bring the full weight of their militaries to bear in fixed engagements.
Finland in the Winter War? For that matter Switzerland in WW2. Those two offer the best model for how to use militia imo.
Conscript them and train up to maybe PFC level.
Move them into reserves with occasional musters for unit training and specialized training for those who want to hone their skills in private sector.
Structure the military itself for a defensive mission where in emergency the military can overnight go from:
Finland - 24,000 soldiers to 300,000
Switzerland - 20,000 soldiers to 215,000
or in more dangerous parts of the world:
South Korea - 600,000 to 6.7 million
Taiwan - 163,000 to 1.8 million
Vietnam - 480,000 to 5.5 million
Brazil - 380,000 to 2.1 million
Those countries wouldn't fight as well as that max number. But none of them are dicking around with and wasting their efforts on empire. And the real purpose of that sort of defense is to intimidate and prevent war.
As one Swiss soldier said apocryphally in the late 1930's - when the Swiss were mustering and training up for a militia of 800,000 but an army of 40,000. A German general asked one of them - What would you do if Germany invaded with 500,000 soldiers? The militiaman said - Shoot twice and go home.
How do you occupy that sort of country? You can't.
After Denmark and Norway fell in 1940, General Guisan and the Federal Council gave an order to the Swiss populace:
Attack invaders
Act on your own initiative
Regard any surrender broadcast or announcement as enemy propaganda
Resist to the end.
This was published as a message to the Swiss and a warning to the Germans. Surrender was impossible, even if ordered by the government. Plus the Swiss President is powerless and many Swiss don't even know who he is. So WHO is going to surrender?
Better to pwn the libs than lick their boots like you do.
Coincidentally, a January 26, 2024 article in Reason "No, Blocking Traffic Is Not Protected by the First Amendment . . . It also does not give you carte blanche to violate other laws" by Billy Binion condemns a convoy blocking the route to the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in protest of the Israeli genocide in Palestine.
Thus, there are actually two Reason/Libertarian parties. One condemns pedestrians blocking a highway in the name of free speech, the other defends the right to seize an entire area and run diesels outside apartments.
Guess it just depends what is being protested.