New Hampshire Might Be the Only Competitive Primary in 2024
And the Democratic votes won't even count. Get ready for what might be a weird night.

Polls show many Americans are dreading a potential rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in November—and Tuesday's New Hampshire primary might offer the briefest glimpse of an alternate reality where that outcome isn't a near inevitability.
Yep, it might get a little weird.
The results in New Hampshire are unlikely to change the trajectory of the overall race, but for one night both Trump and Biden could be on the defensive. On the Republican side, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley is polling close enough to Trump that an upset is within the realm of possibility, thanks to the state's unusual primary rules (more on that in a bit).
Meanwhile, Biden isn't even on the ballot in New Hampshire's Democratic primary, which creates a possible opening for Rep. Dean Phillips' (D–Minn.) and author Marianne Williamson's long-shot campaigns to score a win against the incumbent. Biden's supporters will have to write in the incumbent's name, but first they'll have to scroll through over a dozen other names (thanks to the state's famously democratic ballot qualification rules).
Whether Biden wins or loses won't actually matter, though: New Hampshire's primary doesn't determine any delegates for the Democratic convention this year. That's a punishment handed down by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) after New Hampshire defied the DNC's plan to have South Carolina and Nevada vote first in this cycle.
Biden—who finished a distant fifth in New Hampshire four years ago before using South Carolina as a springboard to win the nomination—proposed moving those other states ahead of New Hampshire and subsequently refused to participate in the primary when the state refused to give up its historical spot as the first to vote. One has to wonder if he'd have casually ignored the contest even if he was facing a serious challenger.
The Republican race is more competitive, even if only barely. With Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis exiting the contest on Sunday, New Hampshire is a two-horse race between Trump and Haley. That makes New Hampshire the first test of the theory that Trump's hold on the party could be broken by a one-on-one contest.
Working in Haley's favor is the fact that New Hampshire allows independent voters to choose to cast a ballot in either major-party primary—and roughly 40 percent of voters in New Hampshire are registered as independents. Since the Democratic race is uncompetitive, Haley is banking on grabbing a large share of the independent vote (including many would-be Democratic voters who might relish the chance to deal a blow to Trump).
For Haley, this might be pretty close to a must-win situation. If she cannot win in New Hampshire (or in her home state of South Carolina, which votes on February 24), she will be hard-pressed to find any spot on the map where she could top Trump. For that matter, even if she does win on Tuesday, she faces an uphill battle to so-called "Super Tuesday" (March 5) and beyond.
Adding to the potential weirdness in New Hampshire: A robocall that was reportedly received by some voters on Monday urging them not to participate in the election at all. "Although the voice in the robocall sounds like the voice of President Biden, this message appears to be artificially generated based on initial indications," the New Hampshire Attorney General's office said in a statement.
Next time, maybe the scammers will have the guts to urge voters to back Vermin Supreme—the perennial presidential protest candidate whose name does appear on the Democratic ballot in New Hampshire this year.
Barring a debilitating health or legal setback for the two frontrunners, a Trump vs. Biden rematch appears to be a near-certainty. If this primary season is going to deliver a shocking twist, however, we'll likely see it begin taking shape in tonight's results.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Major takeaway - -
The democrat party doesn't believe in democracy.
They refuse to let their party members vote, and try to get republicans off the ballot so republicans can't vote.
And the writers at Reason approve of this approach.
Though I think it’s excessively cruel to say that Nikki Haley looks like two horses. It’s just one.
She went out and decried racism and racially based victim hood this week. Talking about growing up as a brown skinned person. If she thought she would get the Ronny D voters by espousing racial victim hood, she is a worse campaigner than Ronny.
It's as if they took George W. Bush and followed Eric Cartman's advice - "Put a chick in it. And make it lame...". I'll add "and gay" when Nikki's polling hits low enough for her to try that claim.
Every month start earning more than $12,000 by doing very simple Online job from home.i m doing Qf this job in my part time i have earned and received $12429 last month .I am now a good Online earner and earns enough cash for my needs. Every person can get this Online job pop Over...
Here This Site—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Bitch is done. Now it’s just a question if she wants to waste more money just to lose by 30-40 points in her home state.
Strategically
Not just Republicans, but third-party candidates as well.
One of the most ironic stories Ive read recently is No Labels suing to keep a candidate from using No Labels in Arizona. Confirming they are a label.
toss it for lack of standing lol
DNC employee Seth Rich was murdered in cold blood on the streets of DC almost eight years ago because he divulged this fact to Wikileaks with the hard evidence to back it up.
Now all these years later, not only does pretty much every citizen realuze this fsct, but very people even seem to care.
I do. It’s among many reasons the democrat party has to be eliminated.
Very bizarre death. The usual suspect "fact check" sites all claim "botched robbery", yet Rich still had his watch, money, credit cards, and phone on him - they weren't stolen. Also, Julian Assange claims that Rich was a source for WikiLeaks. Seems like the DCPD and the "fact check" sites are playing cover for something.
Do you read your comments before submitting? "Botched robbery" means the robbery wasn't successful. Thus, he still had his watch, money, etc.
Do you read your comments before submitting, Mr. Ed, or do you speak out of a horse's ass?
Even in a "botched robbery", there's at least an attempt to steal something. Then there's the whole Julian Assange thing.
Ed has already been told what to believe. Facts mean nothing to democrat garbage like him.
In a democracy, parties are free to pick their candidates any way they like; having some government process run "primaries" is not only not necessary, it is an absurdity.
No, "democracy" is just too precious to be entrusted to deplorable voters. Much better of our "betters" make such decisions for us, right Arty?
Competitive: new speak term where Trump wins by only 20 points.
Look, I get it. You don't like Trump. But lets try to live in reality. He will be the GOP nominee.
The hilarious part of the current news cycle is that winning by 15 or 20% in a given primary is now considered weak and not strong enough. The narratives being pushed out are amazing.
Whatever Trump does will not be good enough. So it doesn’t matter how well he does as far as the media is concerned.
Look, I get it. You don’t like Trump. But let’s try to live in reality. He will be the GOP
nomineepresident.There is a pretty good chance they will kill him before that happens.
Agreed. If they feel like election fortification will fall short, he's done.
When that conspiracy theory doesn't pan out will you guys finally admit that not all conspiracy theories are true?
Will you admit nearly everything you called a conspiracy theory was simply you being wrong and preferring the state narrative?
Nearly everything? Yeah right. A couple things turned out to be true. The rest is nonsense.
Sarc is a waste of time. He’s the town drunk and incapable of reason or logic. His motivations are getting drunk and raging against Trump.
Strawcastic doesn't understand the difference between opinion and theory. The list is getting longer.
I'll take that as a no.
He probably never will. We need a Reason FAQ we can point to of stuff Strawcastic doesn't know the meaning of.
That sounds like a very long list.
"They will kill him" is probably a bad way to put it. By my assessment anyway. But when people keep making claims that Trump is going to be a dictator and destroy the country, it becomes more likely that some deranged person will actually take it as literal truth and take a shot at Trump to save democracy and everything good.
I don't really think it is terribly likely, but I wouldn't be too surprised either.
"some deranged person"
Nice way to describe a government agency.
We haven't had an assassination attempt since Hinckley put a .22 in Reagan in 1981. Before that it was Manson Family member "Squeaky" Fromme who couldn't figure out how to use a 1911 on Ford, and of course Kennedy in 1963. It's not that extremists or wack jobs haven't wanted to take down a prominent politician, but I think the Secret Service has stepped up their game; as no one killed Trump during his term of office, I believe that is pretty good evidence of that level of protection they enjoy from the masses.
Much more likely it will be an "inside job" next time around. My guess is the CIA.
One of your better comments today.
I think QUT is right in that the security state we live in makes it unlikely that a lone wako will have the opportunity to "take a shot," and wrong that the CIA will do it.
Probably.
Followed by a civil war.
Just what level of pain will it take for any number of soft Americans to take up arms? I'm thinking it will have to be very severe, as in starvation being just around the corner level of pain.
One notable thing about the American Revolution, that distinguishes it from most if not all revolutions in history, is that people weren't hungry.
As far as Americans taking up arms goes, if that happens in the near future it won't be a revolution. If anything it will be like the Rwandan genocide, as in neighbors killing neighbors. But instead Hutus killing Tutsis, it will be Trumpians like Nardz and Sevo killing people they think are immigrants or "leftists" (anyone who didn't vote for Trump).
The American Revolution is unique in many ways. It's also the only one I can think of that didn't turn into a murderous disaster after the revolutionaries won. I'm not even sure "revolution" is a good word for it. It was a war for independence from a colonial power, but the social and economic structures and hierarchies were mostly preserved. Which I think is why it worked out so well. Sudden radical transformation generally isn't very good for peace and stability.
Your brain is far too desiccated form many decades of severe alcohol abuse to possibly comprehend how such an event will unfold. Regardless, your idiotic vision isn’t even close to the probable reality.
As usual.
Even if he loses the election.
"Trump gained 3 percentage points in the final tracking poll before Tuesday's first-in-the-nation primary, giving him a 60%-38% edge over Haley. About 1% of those surveyed chose someone else, 1% were undecided and less than 1% refused to answer. The survey of 500 likely Republican primary voters was conducted from Jan. 21-22. The margin of error is 4.4%."
NH Tracking poll, updated one hour ago
So define "competitive."
With 91% of the vote counted, Trump is up by nearly 12%.
Don't worry Boehm, you can still strategically vote for the biggest government statist again.
And he will. He will.
That makes New Hampshire the first test of the theory that Trump's hold on the party could be broken by a one-on-one contest.
No. It might if it involved a candidate somewhat less execrable than Nikki Haley. But, let's face it, she's the one person who could unify Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Rand Paul, and Vivek Ramaswamy in agreeing #NeverNikki. The only reason she's even competitive in NH is that the governor is putting his political machine behind her. About the only people I can see who like her are big-money donors in the MIC and "libertarian" publications that run ads for her.
Once she gets her bill requiring verified ID in order to post, this commentariat will disappear.
Reason already knows who we are.
It would also be a signal of her primary campaign in NH wasn’t to get crossover Dem voters since their primary in NH doesn’t matter anyways. As the DNC removed their delegates. So they can all cross over to effect the GOP primary.
Anything that doesn't follow the expectations of Trump's followers is fraud.
Pour sarc. Broke the booze out early.
Says the guy who mainlines Kool Aid.
Goddamn you’re bad at this, pussy.
Pour, pour Sarc.
You sound worried.
You should be.
Trump will win by ar least 20 and even the shill media will start saying it's over. (Pro tip - it was over before the first republican primary "debate").
My worry is that the J6 2025 rioters won't be unarmed.
Your conspiracy theory is duly noted.
That's not what conspiracy theory means. You're smarter than that. Stop sucking up to JA and ML. It's not a good look.
No one's sucking up to JA and ML. The rest of us are all calling as we see it.
I'm just hoping DN is too smart and too honest to become one of you girls.
DN, among others, has seen through your bullshit.
I thought it was apropos since the idea the establishment hates Trump so much they would assassinate him is considered one.
And I’ll suck up to whoever I feel like on any given day 😛 (jk, I’m not here to suck up to anyone.)
Do not put ANYTHING past the Deep State. They are psychopaths.
The Presidential primary system is useless and ridiculous. Gone are the days of voters were given a choice. In our divided country, parties need to get the candidates quick and spend their time whipping the base to get out the vote. So, the nominee is picked in a few weeks. I am not sure how far you would need to go back to when my own state of Wisconsin made a difference in the primary? People can criticize the smoke filled back room, but we don't seem to have progressed much with primaries.
agreed. and it's getting worse and worse.
both national party committees are attempting to shape the choice more and more and take it away from voters. and to be quite honest, the voters don't seem to care.
both national party committees are attempting to shape the choice more and more and take it away from voters
That is how political parties are supposed to work. Direct, government-subsidized voting on party presidential candidates is a joke.
I also don't understand complaints about party leaders exercising their duly granted powers. The leaders of a party dictate things whether it was formed around a candidate or around a set of principles. The principle of free association allows people who dislike the way party leaders act to move on to other associations or form their own.
The Presidential primary system is useless and ridiculous.
Of course it is. It was created by progressives in the 20th century to undermine liberty and self-determination.
Primary elections have always been a means by which party leaders can corrupt the states in order to increase the loyalty of voters to the main parties. And to prevent a clusterfuck like the D's had in 1968 - where only McCarthy/Kennedy participated in primaries (14 of them I think) and Humphrey did caucuses/conventions. That was the last election where primaries were mostly irrelevant.
Primaries never had a legitimate justification imo. The pseudorationale - let more people judge which Prez candidates they prefer - has done nothing but create a candidate pool of Prez who base their appeal on charisma, personality, emotion, etc. Which has mostly served to increase the power of the Presidency as the sole representative of all the people. And therefore increased the likelihood of a charismatic dictatorship.
Remember when the NH presidential primary used to be in March?
Yes, back when the World Series was played in early September.
Remember when the US presidential inauguration used to be in March?
Wow, so you're ancient for a horse's ass, Mr. Ed as the last time that happened was 1933.
Let’s go Vermin!
"Vermin Supreme." Sounds like a dish served in a Japanese POW camp.
Are crickets vermin?
It’s also on the menu that the Davos crowd wants to force on the little people.
bro, share your drugs.
Unfortunately, no matter who gets that office, the west has ignored human nature/invasion and conquest that had been going on since the beginning of written history. After the Cold War, the west seemed to believe that despotic leftists would magically cease to exist and that being taught individual responsibility would destroy civilization just like a mean tweet. In 2024, I believe the entirety of South America is socialist, with Argentina as an exception. If the west and allies cannot build military superiority necessary for our new reality- Russia, Iran, China, leftist ground invasions, the west and our allies in Asia and the Middle East are screwed no matter who wins the election.
Live free or Die! Long live free market Capitalism.
Bwaa-haaa-haaa!!!! I'll have some of what you're smoking! I haven't been that high since the '60s.
Alternate reality? Halery vs Xiden is just Xiden vs Xiden... two WEF NEO stooges marching towards a global slave state.
There is a significant chance Trump will stumble us into one of those just by being his usual gormless self.... but there is an INEVITABLITY that every single other declared major party candidate from the primaries, and the overwhelming majority of politicians and administrative state thugs, will plunge humanity into a dystopian hellscape.
"What a time" to be alive.
>Commie Supreme
Lol. I trolled the shit out of that dipshit in 2020
This court case reminds me of the allegations against someone else...
https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/our-protest-rights-are-in-the-supreme-courts-hands?initms_aff=nat&