Bad Apples
Plus: Libertarian populism, library wars, Latin American soft power, and more...

Two terrible choices. Yesterday, Donald Trump indulged in some late-night tweeting. "A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION," he wrote on his TruthSocial platform, referring to the pending immunity case that a federal appeals court heard arguments for last week and will soon rule on.
"ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END. EVEN EVENTS THAT 'CROSS THE LINE' MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD. THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN'T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL 'ROGUE COP' OR 'BAD APPLE.' SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH 'GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.' ALL PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE COMPLETE & TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, OR THE AUTHORITY & DECISIVENESS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE STRIPPED & GONE FOREVER. HOPEFULLY THIS WILL BE AN EASY DECISION. GOD BLESS THE SUPREME COURT!"
(It's likely that the federal appeals court will give Trump a no, and that this will get appealed to the Supreme Court, which will need to rule on this sooner rather than later due to how far into election season we're getting.)
"Reckon for a moment with what it is Trump is actually endorsing here: a literal prescription for strongman-style dictatorship," writes National Review's Jeffrey Blehar. "A thugocracy. The Great Leader and his goons may commit some crimes here and there, but let that slide for the greater good."
Trump also seems to be gesturing toward qualified immunity—the legal doctrine that allows cops to get away with bad behavior if their misconduct was not "clearly established" via a prior court ruling—and acting as if we ought to expand such a thing instead of scrapping it. Contra Trump, our current system allows too many "bad apples" to get away with far too much, and effective law enforcement doesn't have to involve shielding incompetent or malicious government actors from consequences.
Ditto for politicians, regardless of their party. Nobody should be above the law. In a prior era—before their one true love rode down that golden escalator—most Republicans agreed with that.
Don't like Trump? Try … the other guy. Also yesterday, a reporter asked President Joe Biden, "Are the airstrikes in Yemen working?"
"Well, when you say 'working'—are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they gonna continue? Yes," answered Biden.
I'm sure he didn't intend it as such, but this sort of sums up American foreign policy for the last few decades. Awkward when a president says the quiet part out loud!
Scenes from New York: A midwife on Long Island gave children homeopathic tablets meant to protect against serious viruses—polio, measles, hepatitis—and falsified their records, claiming she had vaccinated them.
QUICK HITS
- Ibram X. Kendi's How to Be an Antiracist is stocked in 42 percent of the school districts studied by James Fishback for The Free Press. But Fishback only found one school district where John McWhorter's Woke Racism—which pushes back on Kendi's ideas—was stocked. (Of course, McWhorter isn't the only corrective for Kendi's terrible book, but I think Fishback's point still stands; read the full piece for more.)
- On this week's Just Asking Questions, we chat with Matt Welch about libertarian populism, the Iowa caucuses, and his own Central/Eastern European origin story.
- The U.S. is currently dealing with a strange mix of high inflation and low joblessness.
- Read this heartbreaking story about the migrants in New York City who have been sleeping in the snow, awaiting ID cards issued by the state that are necessary precursors to finding legal work.
- A good take. More from Peter Meijer (who may or may not be a Just Asking Questions guest soon) here.
Today I filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in the ongoing 14th Amendment Section Three disqualification case. The absurd decision from the Colorado Supreme Court that state officials can block candidates from the ballot on subjective grounds cannot be allowed to stand. https://t.co/mLPQmIq6Db
— Peter Meijer (@RepMeijer) January 18, 2024
- Controversial opinion over here but I think it's fine—good, even—for pastors to live out their faiths by sheltering the homeless when it's freezing outside. (The state of Ohio disagrees.)
- "Every booster you take, you're more likely to get COVID as a result of it," said Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently. (That's not true, writes Reason's Ronald Bailey.)
- Latin America "enjoys some other, less obvious, advantages in today's troubled world: its states are not at war with each other; it is more democratic than any other developing region; and it is building soft power—latino music, food, art, and films have global audiences. In addition, digital nomads cite Mexico City, Medellín and Buenos Aires as among the world's best cities for remote working." More from Michael Stott at Financial Times.
- Yes:
Late stage communism is so absurdly comical at times. This entire communist country has fewer amenities than one capitalist cruise ship! https://t.co/OY8TaJQ6Wx pic.twitter.com/LampHYCznk
— Conor Friedersdorf (@conor64) January 18, 2024
- LOL:
Wow, I didn't know Elizabeth Warren was at Davos
pic.twitter.com/q9FwDDx3Z8— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 18, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
https://twitter.com/_Escapekey_/status/1748317807006118335
how kind of the temperatures to wait for the 'consensus' to be established in 1979.
as soon as the 'consensus' formed, the temperatures started increasing.
Making every month extra dollars by doing an easy job Online. Last month i have earned and received $18539 from this home based job just by giving this only mine 2 hrs a day. Easy to do work even a child can get this and start making money Online. Get this today by follow instructions
.
On This Website—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Have you noticed temperatures started rising after the nuclear test ban treaty was enacted?
Was that sheer coincidence? or did Carl Sagan have something to say about it?
https://twitter.com/VividProwess/status/1747253918382666049
Testimonies from
@UNRWA
students in Gaza:
“With Allah’s help, the Jews will die.”
Sounds like Harvard. In the 1920s.
No different in the 2020s.
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1747855149249298775
Police Commissioner of Milan: "In 2023, in Milan 73% of the total number of those arrested for robberies committed on public roads are represented by immigrants. For dexterous thefts, the percentage reaches 95%!" Impressive data.
I'm sure all of our asylum seekers are the best their countries had to offer. We won't have any of those problems.
"Dexterous" thefts? Is that like robbing you while juggling?
Pickpocket attempts that only succeeded because of a +3 or greater attribute modifier.
(nerd)
Excuse me. I want to make sure I understand that we are now supposed to feel sorry for invaders from tropical countries who have occupied Chicongo and Noo Yawk, and have discovered to their horror that those northerly cities get just a tad colder in the winter than their peri-equatorial homelands do.
Eff'em! In some places invaders get a much "warmer welcome" than we provide them here. I really don't care (not even a little) how many of them Jack Frost offs.
And to really chap off the snowflakes, I haven't broken a single law with the above sentiment, and there's not a thing you can do about it because you can neither lock me up nor cost me my job.
All cultures are equal.
So when does the decolonization come in?
https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1748354324210581830?t=gOiMnOg07cx800DBBK2tDA&s=19
We’re going to have the most diverse and inclusive societal collapse in history
They’re all going to be on welfare the rest of their lives. Then their kids. And then their grandkids. And they’ll continue voting for the people who keep giving it.
All according to plan.
[Link]
Biden cancels another 74000 student loans in spite of USSC ruling.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-ignores-supreme-court-cancels-another-74000-student-loans
Yep, speaking of strongman Presidents...
It is under the "We need more votes" clause of the Constitution.
Diet Shrike will invoke the general welfare clause in the taxation clause to defend it.
Hey, the Constitution only applies to mean people.
Except we do not speak much of these sort of actions as those of a "strongman".
Nothing like doubling down on a terrible decision. This is easily the worst thing Biden has done.
Yeah, but he SAYS he respects the Constitution, so this is ok.
— sarc
Liar! He said recognizes not respect!!!
And words mean more than actions.
/sarcasmic
https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1748396868374011914?t=5EKeW5K3NOPTIQdAFfQWEg&s=19
Again, STEM is being destroyed in broad daylight. This is civilization-destroying stuff. And it’s accelerating.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/jengleruk/status/1747857678548754831
Susceptible people can be persuaded that they’ve gone blind (and there are historical precedents of this happening in groups).
Why then do we never consider the psychosomatic effects of billions of dollars of relentless military-grade propaganda about a “deadly respiratory virus”?
See here for an interesting piece on hysterical blindness in
...Notably, the Wikipedia page on conversion disorder (as these syndromes are now called) mentions blindness, but also happens to mention “the symptom of feeling unable to breathe”.
(Semi-)seriously. The human brain evolved to be a belief engine. While some of us have the capacity to think critically and challenge dogma, we also have a brain evolved over hundreds of thousands of years that rewarded embracing tribal behavior with reproductive success. And the core of tribal allegiance is embracing tribal beliefs (and certainly not questioning them).
Anyone surprised by the collective delusions (and stupidity) of crowds is not paying attention.
And today’s religionists now say that like it is human destiny ("But you gotta believe in something...")…after having fought tooth-and-nail against Evolution ever since Charles Darwin proposed the theory. *
It is also a basic fact of Biology that for conscious living things, when the method of consciousness doesn’t correspond with reality, it can result in not perceiving a benefit or threat and either not thriving or outright slaughter. Natural Selection requires that we Rational Animals question too.
*(And before anyone says “Evolution is only a theory,” a theory is an explanation of a natural phenomenon based on evidence.. Don’t confuse a theory with a guess.)
"And before anyone says “Evolution is only a theory,”"
'Poisoning the Well', I don't know of anyone here who would say that.
“But you gotta believe in something…”
I've never met an anti-theist who had less radical and unscientific beliefs about religion, than any Mullah about apostates.
You don't get out much, do you? Every Christian I've ever heard disputing Evolution dismisses it as "just a theory."
And the most radical Anti-Theists I ever encountered run YouTube channels and, unlike Mullahs, don't call for murdering or harming anyone.
Get a better circle of people.
(“But you gotta believe in something…”)
How’s it going in Ukraine?
They're staving off Putin's Orthodox Revanchist onslaught...with the latest scientific weaponry, not belief.
In a surprise to nobody, Judge Chukan refuses to hold Jack Smith in contempt for openly violating her stay order while appeals go through. Judge refuses to say delays during the stay will change the timeline of the trial.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2804147/jack-smith-not-found-in-contempt/
It's almost like the fix is in with all of these "legal" cases.
A neutral judiciary is a threat to democracy.
https://twitter.com/awstar11/status/1747773415459848651
They lied to our faces, punished people for questioning them, banned the NY Post from social media. And, not one person will be held to account for it. Not a one.
...In a new court filing today, the DOJ confirms Hunter Biden’s laptop is real, that he left it at a computer store, and that the contents matched what they obtained from a search warrant of his iCloud.
Didn't they have it in their possession for a year or more before the NYPost article came out and prompted the 51 intelligence officers to refute it?
They had confirmed it against the iCloud and knew it was real in 2019 per deposition testimony.
They had it during President Trump's first impeachment trial.
The FBI committed a Brady violation.
Brady violations are S.O.P. for the FBI. Other Brady violations were withholding exculpatory video footage of Jan 6. But, you see, that's good because the defendants were "MAGAts."
You were a conspiracy theorist until yesterday for saying the laptop was real.
/sarcasmic
Fucking facts changed.
Found another useful idiot…
That looked like sarcasm.
Definitely.
Poe's Law has a habit of catching many on the internet unawares.
He's busy in the last article whining about us being "mean" to Jeffy and changing the subject.
Whenever I think you guys can't get more stupid and dishonest, you manage to surprise me.
Pour sarc.
Pour Sarc.
Drink!
Awe. Pour sarc.
https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1747676235122065615
WEF panelist declares farming and fishing as "Ecocide".
They want to legally recognize “ecocide” and then criminalize farming, fishing and energy production.
These people are sick and need to be stopped.
We are the carbon they want to reduce. Not even hyperbole.
Yup. Time for peasants and pitchforks soon.
Ropes and lampposts.
“I HOPE THE DEPOPULATION WILL OCCUR IN A CIVIL AND PEACEFUL WAY” – WEF mastermind Dennis Meadows
And they are proposing Species-cide for human beings and belong on trial in The Hague if they ever try to implement their desires.
They must think that they are JHVH-1 from the Noah legend, the very JHVH-1 who, never forget, thought that his Creation was a mistake.
"And they are proposing Species-cide for human beings and belong on trial in The Hague if they ever try to implement their desires."
100% this.
"They must think that they are JHVH-1 from the Noah legend, the very JHVH-1 who, never forget, thought that his Creation was a mistake."
They only think they're gods.
Toed back to the conversation about humans being hard wired to believe in something, do you think this could have anything to do with them eschewing “religion”?
It seems like most people consistently replace the church with the state when they stop believing in god (atheist libertarians not withstanding).
"And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve." - Joshua 24:15
Joshua had this right in the bag. Amen!
So since farming has gone on before people started firguring out that they can make "pictures" of speech by scratching patterns onto rocks with chalk,
why has not the whole world been "ecocided" already?
If fishing and farming are ecocide, then how is not the logical solution genocide?
That panelist would seem to be an enemy of the human species.
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1747911196815073790
After obtaining a German passport, Muslim immigrant mocks Germans: "You are powerless, I have conquered your land. Now I belong to the system, everything belongs to me, everything is under my feet!"
"Where de white women at?"
This dude would m ore likly ask, "Where the Judenfraulein at"?
I must wonder how the Judenfraulein in Germany feel about this mass migration, considering the migrants' attitudes.
If they're anything like Judenfraulein here, they probably voted for the people who made it happen.
Who knew that DEI reached all the way into your panties?
https://twitter.com/RubinReport/status/1747964082219536611
Just snapped this pic.
This is the state of absolute insanity happening at our airports. I’m in the Pre-TSA line, where migrants don’t have to have an ID to get through security and it’s their choice whether they want their picture taken.
Refugees like me had to follow the rules to come here — why don’t today’s migrants?
https://nypost.com/2024/01/18/opinion/refugees-like-me-had-to-follow-the-rules-to-come-here-why-dont-todays-migrants/
"Because you're a sucker."
--Joe Biden
I love seeing illegals getting treated better than citizens.
Sure to not cause resentment.
Think of it as anti-colonial reparations.
Honestly, a lot of the problem could be solved by forced quartering of the poor, huddled, cold masses of invaders "just yearning to breathe free and ride the gravy train to infinity" in the homes of private citizens (and who says that the members of this legion of lonely, young, vital males are not "entitled" to some comfort with the daughters of you white oppressors?). What I haven't yet decided is whether this forced quartering of the cold shivering invaders should fall on homeowner supporters of Biden because they're overweeningly dumb, or on the homeowner supporters of Trump because his tweets are mean. I'm not even sure which group of forced landlords would handle their charges more gently as opposed to having numbers of them "just disappear". Biden supporters are supposedly kind-hearted and care greatly for the disadvantaged, but it has been my observation that they move quickly and absolutely without remorse to destroy anyone who does not agree that, for today at least, 2 + 2 = 5, and that there is no limit to the pain they are willing to inflict upon wrong thinkers, for their own good of course.
And please, to save electrons and the planet, those of you who are offended by the sentiments above, please endeavor to maintain that sense of offense for the rest of the year, so I don't have to use more precious electrons to upset you again before the ball falls once again in Noo Yawk.
I’m intrigued by your post and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
If the government forced me to house illegal immigrants, I’m afraid I’d have to break a hole in the ice of my pond.
If you want to see how the left views truth, see WaPos Phillip Bump.
Philip Bump
@pbump
Recently published research indicates that digging for more information about a false claim can just reinforce the claim. Mix in deliberate misrepresentations and things get even worse.
This is why the left and liberaltarians demand we only use wiki, AP, and Reuters while ignoring primary sources. They demand narratives over facts, treating journalists who have been wrong on every major story as prophets of truth.
Isn't Bump a bit of a douche?
I thought he was the poster boy for the "You may think you hate journalists enough....but you really, really do not hate them nearly enough" movement.
He is the wapo guy who tried developing a "real time fact checker" app against Trump then publicly said there was no reason to fact check Biden.
https://insidesources.com/bias-shows-wapo-fact-check-tool/
So yes. Huge partisan double.
Feelings >>> Facts
Journalism in the 21st century.
"Recently published research indicates that digging for more information about a false claim can just reinforce the claim."
This may be the most classic Chemjeff-type argument I've ever heard outside this comments section.
Must do anything to "save (D)emocracy"!
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ex-irs-consultant-took-job-intention-stealing-trumps-tax-returns-doj
The NYT had fawning posts of members of antifa and the left bragging about using federal databases to go after political opposition. We have seen it over and over again. They aren't even fired.
The next budget should include a small section forcing the IRS to only use federal employees, and a condition that if ANY tax return is leaked, the entire department gets an immediate 10% permanent pay cut, and loses that year as pension accrual.
I hope this loyal soldier feels The Cause is worth his personal sacrifice.
Because the Left has no gratitude and this dude won't even be considered a martyr. He's just going to be forgotten by those he fought for.
He must be the cleanest tax payer in history. You know good and well that every auditor and thousands of employees at the IRS want to be the one to take down Trump, and we're yet to see anything remotely illegal leaked out of his taxes.
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1748325738346922196
Terrifying Footage Shows Boeing 747 Engine Fire Over Miami
"If it's Boeing, I'm not going"
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1748261544033390730
"It Feels Like Something Has Gone Terribly Wrong" - 5 Swedish Cops Forced To Pay Fine To Convicted Syrian Migrant Who Brutally-Attacked Them
Some good old fashioned peaceful protesting happening with that bus in the background.
Why aren't more politicians being iced?
They need, desperately, to regain their fear of the masses they govern.
Did you miss the announcement that the elite have now taken control, and will rightly rule over us rabble without regard for laws or morals?
Populism is bad. We need to protect people from themselves. Democracy must be protected by disallowing choice.
Stop confusing democracy as a process with democracy as a predetermined ideological outcome.
https://twitter.com/TheRealHMLegend/status/1748284436360372332
When criminals are rewarded for committing crimes, the system is broken, and the only way to bring it back is ruthless vigilante justice.
Apparently it is because Sweden has a loser pays policy for civil suits. The police had sued the man for damages but withdrew their suit for some reason, so they are considered the losers. Still seems absurd considering he was criminally convicted.
"Ibram X. Kendi's How to Be an Antiracist is stocked in 42 percent of the school districts studied by James Fishback for The Free Press."
That's welcome news to Reason's leading defender of race-obsessed progressivism. A nice pick-me-up after the recent Supreme Court setback on affirmative action.
#RadicalIndividualistsForRacialCollectivism
So I can assume that in the 58% of schools that don't have Kendi's book, it has been banned and/or burned?
You can assume whatever you want, but not EVERY school district obsesses on DEI bullshit. Likely urban districts only
No books have been banned.
Bertram is being sarcastic here, mocking the likes of Sarc and Jeffy.
Correct, sorry for lack of sarcasm tag.
Poe's Law is the bane of the internet.
Nah, most of those schools no longer require reading skills, and spent their library budgets on trans "story" hours. You know, the kind with dancing.
You can also assume the students in those 42% school districts can't read.
As an aside, I wonder how many schools keep a copy of Snow White in their libraries.
Asking for Jeffy?
How many school librarians have a bear in the trunk?
Damn this never gets old!
Ann Rice's Sleeping Beauty series?
https://twitter.com/TheInsiderPaper/status/1643026084911357953
Jeffrey Epstein behavior had been ‘so widely known’ at JPMorgan that execs allegedly joked about Epstein’s interest in young girls while the disgraced financier was a client of the banking giant, lawyers for the US Virgin Islands have claimed in a new court filing.
Have the JPMorgan execs ever hung out with Hunter?
The real reason we should tax billionairs and multi-millionaires into extinction is not the money they have, the wealth inequality - but because they're all disgusting human beings.
This might actually happen.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_100bf8ec-b64e-11ee-bda1-4baa07b8bd54.html
Then do it!
I'll believe it when I see it.
Agreed. Bet it will never happen.
Tell ya what, lets just keep the ones that actually get the advanced degrees. Deal?
DIMON ON UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS: 'Let them stay and let them build companies'
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dimon-undocumented-immigrants-let-them-203440800.html
...He added that "kids" come from around the world to get advanced degrees at top universities, and then, "We send them home."
Are we talking advanced computer science and chemical engineering, or advanced critical theory and gender studies?
M'Beke isn't going back to Boko Haram with his gender studies degree. He's going back with his STEM degree so he can build them better IED's.
But I bet if M'Beke did embrace some new gender identity, he/she ain't going back.
"Reckon for a moment with what it is Trump is actually endorsing here: a literal prescription for strongman-style dictatorship," writes National Review's Jeffrey Blehar. "A thugocracy. The Great Leader and his goons may commit some crimes here and there, but let that slide for the greater good."
So wr are just pretending there is no impeachment process now? No elections every 4 years? A duty of officers to uphold the constitution?
This is a rationalization for utilizing lawfare for political reasons, which we are literally seeing in real time. State political agents criminalizing the actions of a president they hate.
I guarantee you Fani will claim legal immunity for her actions if she goes to trial for fraud.
If an official act immunity is required. This can be fought with impeachment. This is part of the balancing of the three branches. At no point was there balance for a local official to criminalize an official act.
Imagine the chaos of state A dating an act is illegal but State B says it is not. What is the balancing factor if this is the system you want?
Trump also seems to be gesturing toward qualified immunity—the legal doctrine that allows cops to get away with bad behavior if their misconduct was not "clearly established" via a prior court ruling—and acting as if we ought to expand such a thing instead of scrapping it.
The problem here is you have this concept backwards. The executive is already involved with rules and monitoring of elections. The DoJ has an entire division that often sues states regarding elections. The FBI has a history of convincing voter fraud for federal actions. The history is the executive can and act on vote irregularities for federal elections.
You've turned this concept on its head and are now claiming in this single instance, despite a long history, it is criminal. And more importantly youre claiming petitioning the government and speaking about elections is criminal.
This is such a backwards take Liz.
Liz, how could you (think for yourself)!
Why don't you take on his argument instead of defending Liz? Are you depraved?
Nobody should be above the law. In a prior era—before their one true love rode down that golden escalator—most Republicans agreed with that.
Except every prior president acting in an official capacity.
"John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!" - a Democrat
Not just any Democrat, but the original founder of the party, President Andrew Jackson. He's the reason the Democrats use a jackass (yes, jackass, not donkey) as a symbol.
Without immunity a President's foes will concoct all sorts of novel legal theories in order to depose him. The left would screem bloody murder if the shoe was ever on the other foot, but the spineless GOP would never wear it.
We are literally seeing this in real time and the strongest justification people have come up with is nobody is above the law. Nobody is below the law either. This includes a system of targeting crimes, not individuals. Yet these prosecutors ran campaigns on targeting an individual. We also have a system of clear legal construction. As you mention novel construction is not this. And lastly nobody is above the law requires equal application of the law, which singling out a single target for the law is not.
What is this "law" you claim applies equally to all people and groups? Don't you know how to equity?
You can't impeach without a conviction.
You can't convict without an impeachment.
You can’t impeach without a conviction.
Said nobody ever.
So wr are just pretending there is no impeachment process now?
Impeachment is a purely political process. With otherwise total immunity, the constitution is useless if a president's party controls the Senate.
Imagine what Biden will do with his remaining term if Trump gets his way. Maybe start with some election rule changes?
I'm sympathetic to your concern about the great problem and abuse that the establishment has taken with Trump prosecutions, but surely this isn't the solution.
Youre making a complete assumption that our government is already in banana Republic territory and a simple federal majority in one of the legislative branches shares the same party as the executive, there is no check or balance. Might as well get rid of the Federal government now.
The problem is as I stated on the bottom. State A decides crime, State B says no. Youre seeing this chaos with the 14th amendment. Ignoring impeachment and declaring it impossible actually inserts MORE chaos. Can State B then arrest politicians in State A for criminalizing an act when State B disagrees?
Imagine requiring a president to consult all 50 state AGs for any decision he makes. This is the outcome of the efforts here.
Youre making a complete assumption that our government is already in banana Republic
Aren't we? If not we're close and speeding in that direction. You trust Biden and the Dems?
A state A vs. B issue can be solved with much less sweeping rule than this.
We aren't there yet. But the intention of lawfare against Trump is to get us there sooner.
How can the State A vs State B issue be resolved with a rule if a state can criminalize what constitutes a legal federal act?
Trump is clearly referring to qualified immunity for official acts.
That’s not clear to me. He said “FULL IMMUNITY”. Even so, it doesn’t matter. An executive order is an official act that encompasses basically anything.
Full immunity for the charges against him. He isnt asking to start randomly shooting in the streets. He is referring to the immunity against the cases currently against him, more precisely the ones Jack Smith is charging him with.
One thing is for sure: He's saying everything in all caps. Isn't that Internet-ese for: "I am a lunatic not to be taken at face value?"
🙂
😉
Oh, so you're saying he wants the immunity to ONLY apply to HIM. He might be narcissistic enough to think that's how it works. Are you, though?
Not what I said at all.
In judicial appeals the courts are entered to focus on the case at hand. They can ask for limiting factors for an argument, but the focus should stay on questions at hand. Immunity exists for many levels. Judicial immunity, executive immunity, legal immunity.
So no, not what I or his lawyers are saying at all.
The whole finding a case where immunity wouldn't apply to then claim "so it doesn't apply here" is a false judicial construction.
As stated above the immunity is in regards to official acts regarding elections for which the executive has been involved with for decades.
Yet you seen to want to argue the limiting factor instead of the constructed factor in order to deny immunity.
So no, not what I or his lawyers are saying at all.
OK. Fair enough. But that’s not what Trump is saying. He's saying "A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY".
Yeah, Trump says a lot of stupid shit. That doesn't mean the actual claims being made in court are stupid or wrong.
A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY
But not Biden. That dude belongs in jail.
And based on context it seems to imply to official acts as that is what is legal team largely argued.
Official acts are what I'm most worried about.
If things are so far gone that the Senate will acquit when there is strong evidence that a president, for example, used the military to assassinate a rival for political reasons, then it's already too late. I don't think we are there. The Trump impeachments were decided on political lines because they were politically motivated garbage. I am not convinced that we are so far gone that partisans will acquit for actual high crimes. I hope we don't get to find out for sure.
I hope you're right. I think we're dangerously close and what Trump is asking for could be the tipping point. I'm not comfortable giving the senate the sole power to stop Biden from doing exactly what Trump is accused of in the event Trump wins in 2024. Biden has the backing of the senate, MSM and deep state. I'd like for them to fear prosecution from the 49% for major or minor crimes.
What Trump is asking for is the nominal process we've had since inception. No AGs went after Obama for droning a citizen outside judicial review, for example. Most executive scandal are handled through Congressional oversight from the FBI abuses in the 50s and 60s, COINTELPRO, Iran contra, etc.
Most of those items were criminal actions, controlled through political oversight by Congress.
As long as they leave office when they are supposed to, I'm not too concerned about a president getting away with some crime. I'm sure many have. Guilty people go unpunished literally all the time.
Maybe we'll get lucky and both Biden and Trump will keel over dead sometime before November.
Pretty sure a Republican Senate would have convicted Nixon.
No, we are pretending Biden has not been doing exactly this for his entire time pretending to be president.
Everything is an existential threat to democracy. Especially democracy.
Yeah, the statement struck me as very “accuse your enemy of what you, yourself are guilty”, especially after 2016-2020 Orange Hitler/Kids in cages/WWIII nonsense.
It's already pretty self-evident that if The Constitution literally said “Do not try Donald J. Trump for novel campaign finance crimes in order to prevent him from running for a second term.” Fani Willis and the current thugocracy would wipe their asses with it and proceed to violate it anyway.
I guarantee you Fani will claim legal immunity for her actions if she goes to trial for fraud.
If even that and it’s not just an “Amnesty were begged.” declaration.
Read this heartbreaking story about the migrants in New York City who have been sleeping in the snow
Over $12 billion spent on illegal immigrants and still they have to sleep in the snow. My heart breaks for the hard working New Yorker who doesn't vote for this crap but has to pay for it. I am guessing Liz doesn't have room on her couch for these poor hapless 'migrants'.
I am in Mexico right now.
There is no snow here.
I guess those folks should have stopped walking somewhat earlier.
One would've thought. However, Mexico, unlike the US, deports those who overstay visas and tourist/transit cards.
Not really, they let millions of people from more southernly nations transit their country on their journey to seek 'asylum' in the US.
Exactly, they let them transit, but not stay.
Well they didn't walk all of the way. They got free transportation and a prepaid debit card.
Because the conspiracies keep turning out to be true?
Scientists Explain Why ‘Doing Your Own Research’ Leads to Believing Conspiracies
https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7bjpm/scientists-explain-why-doing-your-own-research-leads-to-buying-conspiracies
So how would any research get done?
Someone's Gotta Be First
https://youtu.be/wC_0q8y4N_Y?si=QdX2rtXh174hfKAD
There's probably something to that. The real conspiracy nutters do a lot of research. People are really good at finding patterns that aren't really there.
But this is, I'm sure, also another case of the disgusting tactic of pointing to the craziest motherfuckers you can find and pretending they are typical, when of course there are lots of careful and thoughtful people finding legitimate reasons to question dominant narratives and lies.
It’s pernicious to claim that only qualified hacks like that WEF climate “scientist” are expert enough to interpret data but the combined expertise of unfamous engineers and applied scientists are not because they lack whatever connections and fame and manufactured “prestige” the latter manages to possess.
Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. People point to the real crazies as typical so they can dismiss people who actually have the skills and intelligence to challenge the supposed official experts.
Conspiracy theorists rarely reject other conspiracy theories because the cognitive tools required to do that simply no longer exist.
Tell that to the Wuhan Lab and that one Delaware laptop store.
There's a study that shows your statement to be wrong too.
Healthcare is a fundamental human right which we will violate if you don't repeat our platitudes.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1747718365207204198
This is dystopian. @MilfordRegional just announced new policies that can deny you care if you use “unwelcome words” such as micro-aggressions related to race and gender.
Hey, the church has always been only for true believers.
Best vehicular anti-theft device in North America.
https://cwbchicago.com/2024/01/chicago-carjacking-robbery-gold-coast-arrests.html
Better yet if they try an old English sports car with a separate starter button.
I've got a 62 Austin Healy in my garage with that setup.
Now I have Austin envy.
Or with Lucas electrics...
AKA The Prince of Darkness, IIRC.
Yup!
https://www.mez.co.uk/lucas.html
Years ago, I worked at a resort that offered valet parking service. Only a couple of us could run a manual transmission. The benefit was we got to park almost all of the sportier cars.
Years ago somebody broke the ignition lock and hotwired my Kawasaki Zephyr 750. He managed to go about 100 yards. Guess he didn't know how to operate a clutch.
So then, no crime, right?
Was it Sarc or Jeff who said there is no crime so long as you give it back?
I know I said Trump wouldn’t be in hot water regarding classified documents if he’d just given them back when first asked. But that’s just me paraphrasing his own attorneys. Got a problem, take it up with them.
Oh, and comparing that to carjacking is ridiculously stupid and dishonest. Or in other words, Friday in the comments.
He had every right to the documents if he took them while still president. The ruling on the Clinton tapes in Judicial Watch vs. NARA stated that as clear as day.
That's the difference between Biden holding the documents and Trump. Biden wasn't president at the time so his actions were illegal and he HAD to give them back. Trump was president and according to JW vs NARA declassified them by the act of taking them.
The raid was completely illegal and Wray and Garland knew that.
So why would he "give them back"?
PRA also doesn't require returning every copy of a document. Obama whole NARA interaction was keeping documents and providing copies to NARA. And this included classified documents.
"Whatabout Biden" or "Whatabout Clinton" doesn't make what Trump did less illegal.
1. Comparing them is not "whataboutism".
2. How was what Trump did illegal when it was legal for Obama, Bush, and Clinton?
3. Do we need to add "whataboutism" to the list of terms you fail to comprehend?
1. What's the point if not to attack the other side with accusations of hypocrisy and claim innocence because they did it first?
2. Was it? I don't know the exact circumstances because it's not worth sifting through shit for peanuts. But my understanding is that Trump is in trouble more for behaving like Cartman than for taking the documents home.
3. Do whatever you want if it makes your girlfriends happy.
"What’s the point if not to attack the other side with accusations of hypocrisy and claim innocence because they did it first?"
Just because this is your mode of thinking, doesn't mean that's true for the rest of us. I know you see trump supporters under every rock, but some here are actually interested in equal treatment under the law.
Crying "Whataboutism" is sarcasmic's way of attempting to wreck someone's argument without doing any actual work and having to refute a legitimate comparison.
The whole idea of "whataboutism" is fallacy and bad faith argumentation.
The argument is literally regarding equal treatment of the law. Comparative examples literally drives that argument.
Stop being retarded.
It sure does, when the Biden Admin is doing the prosecuting
How close to a 1:1 situation does it need to be for you to not cry whataboutism?
Lol. This new lie about just quoting other people despite you openly making the claims dozens of times is hilarious.
Where do you think I got the claim, dumbass?
Sarc admits he has no original thoughts.
It's my understanding that trump was asked to return his documents, and Biden also had documents dating back to a time when he wasn't president, or VP.
I have never heard a good explanation of why they asked trump to return his docs, but didn't ask biden to return his. Does that exist somewhere?
Reports stated that the Biden WH created a false predicate of "needing" one of the docs despite having copies.
Aren't they all copies? If not, why not?
If ex-presidents really need to take secret docs (and I'm not convinced they do), why not take copies? Then there is no need to selectively "ask for them back"
As long as the documents are kept secure (and a locked garage doesn't count), what's the issue?
That assumes ex-presidents keep security clearances. They don't.
Do you know anything about the treatment of classified information? It's a big deal that's taken very seriously.
Yes, I used to hold a clearance and handle classified material.
It's a big deal that's taken very seriously - for certain people. That's the whole point of this discussion.
Then compare apples to apples. Were the people who did it first asked to return the material, and did they? If the answers are yes and yes then there's the difference. Because in Trump's case it's yes and no. Now we're comparing apples and oranges.
The "asked to return them" is the dodge you keep using. Why does the records office get to selectively "ask people to return" them? When I held a clearance, I was never informed that I could take documents and just give them back when asked.
The simple questions are:
Was it legal for trump (who was at least president, so could seemingly use that excuse) to keep the documents or not?
Was it legal for biden (who wasn't even president at the time in question) to keep the documents or not?
When I held a clearance, I was never informed that I could take documents and just give them back when asked.
Were you the president? No? Well that explains that. Powerful people are held to a different standard. Always have been and always will be.
Was it legal for trump (who was at least president, so could seemingly use that excuse) to keep the documents or not?
Was it legal for biden (who wasn’t even president at the time in question) to keep the documents or not?
The key difference between the two is that one cooperated while the other did not.
"Powerful people are held to a different standard. Always have been and always will be."
And trump is being held to a different standard than biden et al. That’s the whole point, guy.
I’m not even a trump supporter, but this kind of shit is what makes him sympathetic as an outsider, who gets treated differently than insiders such as bush, obama, biden.
And sarc is always there to go to the mat defending the insiders (but they cooperated!)
“The key difference between the two is that one cooperated while the other did not.”
The key difference is one was President and so could argue they had the right to those documents. The other was not and no law or anything else gave him the right to possess them.
And all of this still side steps the fact that if Trump DID in fact break the law by having those documents, the law doesn’t just magically disappear if he gives them back when asked. So it would still be a miscarriage of justice to be all “no big deal that you broke federal law since you gave it back. That’s for the little people, lol.”
It’s my understanding that trump was asked to return his documents, and Biden also had documents dating back to a time when he wasn’t president, or VP.I have never heard a good explanation of why they asked trump to return his docs, but didn’t ask biden to return his. Does that exist somewhere?Whatabout Biden?!?!
ftfy
Yeah sarc, thank you for giving your same daily refrain, yet again.
I am comparing two related situations . I don't give a fuck about trump, and as I said, I am not convinced that any ex-president needs to take secret docs at all. Does the info in the documents even need to be classified any more? But it is completely legit to ask why one prez gets treated differently than the other.
I am not convinced that any ex-president needs to take secret docs at all
From what I've read it's sometimes allowed on a limited basis for things like writing memoirs.
Does the info in the documents even need to be classified any more?
Until they're officially declassified, yes.
But it is completely legit to ask why one prez gets treated differently than the other.
Perhaps if the circumstance are identical, but they're not. Even so, "They did it first" is not a valid legal defense.
“They did it first” is not a valid legal defense."
This is the point that you choose to miss all the time. I am genuinely interested in discussing the unequal treatment of different people for the same actions. I don't care about trump or biden's legal defense for their actions.
Then look up the specifics of what the different presidents did and compare them yourself. Don't rely on bullshit filtered through Trump defenders.
The specifics that I've read indicate that Biden is getting a pass for actions that would land a low level person in jail (particularly since he held documents from before he was even prez, so he can't even use the memoir excuse). Maybe trump is getting the same pass.
I think Trump would have been given the same pass if he hadn't acted like a petulant child about it and given the stuff back when asked.
Again, why was he asked? Don't they already have copies of the same documents that they're asking for?
Were Biden and the others asked to give the material back? If so did they return the material or say "I do what I want"? If so did they respond to threats of charges with "I do what I want"?
Again, why was he asked?
Because the material was classified and ex-presidents don't keep their clearances. That seems pretty straightforward to me.
Don’t they already have copies of the same documents that they’re asking for?
Why would that matter? Being originals or copies doesn't make them less classified.
Unless you mean why weren't the documents destroyed. I don't know the answer to that. I presume that it's because shredding them in the garage doesn't follow protocol.
So why wasn't Biden asked to do the same thing? He was an ex-senator and ex-VP - he also didn't retain a clearance.
Please don't respond with more projection of your own double-standards. I am not asking these questions as a way to defend trump.
To spell it out for you –
Forget the names involved.
Two different people without clearances retain secret documents.
One is asked to return them, the other isn’t.
Is this unequal treatment?
So why wasn’t Biden asked to do the same thing?
Nobody asked him to return the material?
From what I've read Biden cooperated with the DOJ, while Trump said "I do what I want".
Can you cite where he was? I thought he "found" it.
Let me spell it out for you. Trump is in trouble more for saying "I do what I want" than for taking the material home. Had he cooperated he wouldn't be in any shit.
Your spelling out doesn't answer the question at hand in any way.
sarcasmic 5 mins ago
Let me spell it out for you. Trump is in trouble more for saying “I do what I want” than for taking the material home. Had he cooperated he wouldn’t be in any shit.
In response to:
Bertram Guilfoyle 8 mins ago
To spell it out for you –
Forget the names involved.
Two different people without clearances retain secret documents.
One is asked to return them, the other isn’t.
Is this unequal treatment?
Sarc, this is why we say you have TDS. You seem unable to separate the name, the person from what is going on. Give it a thought as merely "Person A" and "Person B" for a bit and then get back to us.
At this point I don't know what you are asking. That and so many premises have been thrown out that I'm getting kind of lost.
Why were Clinton, Bush and Obama treated differently than Trump? Because they cooperated. Trump did not. Had they said "I do what I want" then I'm quite certain they'd have been in some shit as well.
Give it a thought as merely “Person A” and “Person B” for a bit and then get back to us.
Persons A and B are presidents who took classified material home.
Person A cooperated and gave the stuff back when asked.
Person B refused to cooperate and claimed they can do whatever they want despite being threatened with criminal charges.
Person A gets a pass. Person B gets charged criminally.
Is that clear enough for you?
The others were "asked to cooperate" differently, or not at all.
This isn't that hard to understand.
You're now intentionally missing the point. "Asked to cooperate" on what basis?
We're talking past each other and I have things to do. Thank you for being civil and have a good weekend.
"We’re talking past each other"
Nope. You're intentionally evading the key point.
“Had they said “I do what I want” then I’m quite certain they’d have been in some shit as well.”
Was biden storing secret documents in a garage an example of saying “I do what I want” ? What shit did it land him in exactly?
Ex presidential clearances are at the behest of the current president. Ex presidents are often invited back for classified discussions. It is a common courtesy. They don't have need to know, but they are often considered to hold onto top clearances in general.
Stop making bald assertions sarc.
Here is my position.
Biden, Obama, Bush, etc. take home secret documents, and store them in varying degrees of security, and nobody really seems to care, no one ever "politely asks them to return" the docs.
Trump does the same thing, and all of a sudden, he is "asked to cooperate." And when he doesn't "cooperate", his house is raided.
I am not even a trump supporter, but this kind of unequal treatment makes him sympathetic.
"things like writing memoirs"
Yes I know this. The point is, if it can be used for an unclassified memoir, then it should be declassified. This isn't complicated, but our fucked up system of classification allows certain people to be above the law. Can an army private take secret docs home from Iraq because he wants to write a memoir? (rhetorical question)
The primary issue is most presidential documents, especially regarding foreign interactions, are generally originated at least as confidential, lowest level of classification. Their presidential documents are filled with these types of documents. It has been common procedure to allow the presidents to keep these types of documents and the PRA even gives them the choice to keep them given the ruling precedence from the Clinton sock drawer case.
Obama had classified documents in a warehouse. As an example.
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/1747642834717454656
"Three weeks ago, during the interrogation of two Hamas terrorists arrested in Israel, they confessed that one of them had attempted to sell my son's head for $10,000 in Gaza. The IDF then entered Gaza, searched an ice cream shop's freezer, and there, in a suitcase, they found my son's head, which had also been desecrated."
"Zionist propaganda", is the term social media is exclaiming.
NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION
https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html
NEW YORK, 17 March (DESA) -- The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.
United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio -- i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person -- will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.
Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.
Major findings of this report include:
-- In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.
-- Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.
UN told EU to accept 1.3m MORE migrants EVERY YEAR or face population crisis
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/721233/migrants-EU-UN-declining-population-crisis-migration-report
...“Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.”
That's a rAcIsT cOnSpiRaCy tHeOrY, Ra's. Just ask Jeff.
There's a solution. Fuck.
Just a Wild, Baseless Conspiracy Theory.
No, no, no.
"Replacement migration" is totally true and a good thing.
"Great replacement theory" is a white supremacy conspiracy.
Yeah, pretty much. As societies get richer people have fewer children for a variety of reasons including lower child mortality, not needing to be taken care of in old age, and pursuing careers. The eventual result is a declining population. So if rich societies want to maintain their population, they're going to have to import people from poor societies.
I'm not sure what your point is.
Or start fucking each other in orifices where pregnancy can occur.
Ironically, without children, there won't be enough money for these people be taken care of in their old age.
Yep. Need working immigrants to pay for Social Security and Medicare.
Assuming said people will be willing to work for Americans they do not know and have no feelings for one way or the other.
....because, if enough of them come --- they can always decide to turn off aid.
That doesn’t make sense. Assuming these immigrants are allowed to work legally, they’re going to pay payroll taxes.
Here’s an interesting tidbit. If legal non-citizens stay non-citizens they still have to pay those payroll taxes using an ITIN instead of an SSN, but get nothing in return. It’s pure profit for Social Security and Medicare.
Sarcasmic, you can't tell the truth like that!!! That makes you a LEFTIST!!!
Actually, illegal humans pay in about $10 billion per year to prop up Social Security (under fake SSNs), with little if any hope of ever getting to benefit from what they paid in. That's why the Feds are half-assed in fighting illegal humans, is because they ("illegals") are so helpful in propping up Social Security. This is the actual truth, but illegal-human-haters don't want to talk about that particular FACT...
"The Truth About Undocumented Immigrants and Taxes" (in quotes) in your Google search window will take you straight there, hit number one...
http://reason.com/blog/2017/07/18/its-official-republicans-hate-immigrants
You are a leftist, Shillsy.
Also, you’re pulling the Reasonista trick of deliberately conflating legal and illegal immigration.
Sarcasmic very clearly wrote: “Assuming these immigrants are allowed to work legally… If legal non-citizens stay non-citizens”
That and promoting institutionalizing of a lower class citizen who is taxed without representation.
"That and promoting institutionalizing of a lower class citizen who is taxed without representation."
This is the "de facto" stance of those who support "big. beautiful walls". More-open-borders kinds of folks do NOT support this shit! "This shit" is a stance of SAYING that all humans are equal, but REALLY believing in "some are more equal than others", "magic papers", and hatred of "those others"! While "those others" merely want to WORK for honest wages!
"Also, you’re pulling the Reasonista trick of deliberately conflating legal and illegal immigration."
“Team R” absolutely LOVES the unwanted Sacred Fartilized Egg Smells… And vehemently HATES the illegal sub-humans!
When many-many-MANY “Team R” find themselves in a collapsing economy, starving, with bedsores and bitten by ants, in decrepit old age homes… For lack of labor… Then some “Team R” political Big-Wig will FINALLY discover a Government-Almighty SOLUTION! Issue Government-Almighty “Magic Papers” and turn the illegal sub-humans into legal humans, turning them from dross into gold! Better yet, turn them into HONORARY Sacred Fartilized Egg Smells, and THEN they will be LOVED and adored!!! (Or at the very least, be allowed to WORK legally, without this "taxation w/o representation" shit that we have going on right now).
MAGIC PAPERS PRONTO, PLEASE!!! Turn that dross into gold!!!
It's a bot, scraping Xitter for whatever it's been programmed to find.
It doesn't have a "point".
You're deeply mistaken. Read the post. It's filled with facts. Why do you go to lengths to defend sarc or the U.N.?
Latin America "enjoys some other, less obvious, advantages in today's troubled world: its states are not at war with each other..."
Venezuela has other ideas when it comes to Guyana.
"Read this heartbreaking story about the migrants in New York City who have been sleeping in the snow, awaiting ID cards issued by the state that are necessary precursors to finding legal work."
Do I really need more proof that your colleague Fiona embarrassed herself when she wrote LOL anti-open-borders people sent immigrants to Martha's Vineyard but GUESS WHAT in just 24 hours the stunt backfired because Democrat-run areas totally love immigrants and everything turned out great for everyone!
No. I don't need more proof Koch-funded libertarians cannot be trusted to write honestly about the effects of unrestricted immigration. That was already clear when Mayor Adams (D - NYC) warned unrestricted immigration would "destroy" his city.
Yes. Sad to see New Liz parroting the Koch party line.
KMW's been looming over her with a stick.
Yeah, but it's fun to see you guys react to her "betrayal".
It’s even more fun watching your guys in NY and Chicago freak out about the consequences of their empty virtue signaling.
https://twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1747958077108715934
“There’s a real spin behind this”.
“This” being convincing the Ukrainians to continue fighting because if they lose hope/stop fighting, it is “not in our interests”.
It’s not just that they said it by accident, behind closed doors, or among themselves.
The
@WEF
literally published it to the world thinking what they said was good. Or not caring how evil it truly is.
Why do you think we're funding Ukraine to resist Russian aggression? Out of the goodness of our hearts? Obviously, it is in our interests that Ukraine fights Russia (rather than us).
Are you a bit slow?
Because sacrificing other people’s lives for our best interests is a shitty thing to do?
Because sacrificing other people’s lives for our best interests *against their will* is a shitty thing to do?
Spam is Obviously “a bit slow”.
I was told it was a bargain at only 5% of the defense budget. See it is a good thing.
(Note: that this statement is quite distant from my own beliefs.)
https://twitter.com/toadmeister/status/1747997324511506872
Newly elected Prime Minister Donald Tusk has been busy sending riot police to purge Polish media of those who oppose him – and suddenly the EU has nothing to say about the 'rule of law' in Warsaw.
Of course not; he's doing the EU's work. See, if you oppose the EU, you're evil, bad, and must be repressed. If you work for the EU, then you have license to do what you need to do to repress those who oppose the EU.
Imagine the shitstorm if this was happening in Hungary. I'm sure chemjeff and Shrike would be screaming about it.
It is a "state broadcaster", so you do kinda expect it should answer to...the state, no?
Tusk should have abolished the state broadcaster, not taken it over.
Why are you defending state-controlled media? Are you this infested by TDS?
Medically assisted deaths could save millions in health care spending: Report
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/medically-assisted-death-could-save-millions-1.3947481
...Doctor-assisted death could reduce annual health-care spending across the country by between $34.7 million and $136.8 million, according to a report published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on Monday.
The savings exceedingly outweigh the estimated $1.5 to $14.8 million in direct costs associated with implementing medically assisted dying.
"The take-away point is that there may be some upfront costs associated with offering medical assisted dying to Canadians, but there may also be a reduction in spending elsewhere in the system and therefore offering medical assistance in dying to Canadians will not cost the health care system anything extra," said Aaron Trachtenberg, an author of the report and a resident in internal medicine at the University of Calgary.
Hey, if that's the new marching orders from The Left, so be it.
One third of Canadians fine with prescribing assisted suicide for homelessness
Roughly the same number told a poll they were fine with approving MAID for someone whose only affliction was poverty
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canada-maid-assisted-suicide-homeless
One third of Canadians fine with prescribing assisted suicide for homelessness
To be fair, so am I. *
*If my support of ‘assisted suicide’ for homeless people gets people to wake up to exactly the outcomes I predicted in the 1990s when assisted suicide became the topic du jour and was even supported by Libertarianism Plus, then I’m going in hard.
How much will the US save if we stop paying for healthcare of democrats?
Asking for a friend.
Imagine if we medically assisted them to die.
Death panels are a rightwing conspiracy theory.
And like all rightwing conspiracies, certified true 6 months later.
I believe we've already agreed to call them 'spoiler alerts'.
It took a lot longer than that for people to notice the death panels. This was debated years and years ago (at least 20 years for me) and we were all told we were reactionaries who hated poor people.
Well, now the poor people are being euthanized by the people that were chastising us about hating poor people. Guess killing them is kinder, somehow.
True, but with AI the process has been accelerated.
While I don't object to anyone's right to commit suicide or the right to consult a professional to do so, one thing you cannot rightly do is call this health care. This is end-of-life care.
Health care is based on the premise that life is worth preserving.
I'm going to get a tattoo on my chest that says that I do not consent.
Make sure you get it in several languages. Your DEI 'Dr' will likely not speak english.
I think it should be the only approved treatment for climate anxiety.
https://twitter.com/RepLuna/status/1747692994487038432
Why was
@CatoInstitute
’s David Bier laughing about child trafficking at the border?
Disgusting display of ignorance.
Read this heartbreaking story about the migrants in New York City who have been sleeping in the snow, awaiting ID cards issued by the state that are necessary precursors to finding legal work.
If only they had a choice on how to avoid sleeping in snow.
Appeal to emotion noted. Now let's have a few blurbs of veterans and homeless citizens kicked out of shelters and homes.
Students kicked out of their schools.
Stop defending nativist privilege!
How a Polyamorous Mom Had ‘a Big Sexual Adventure’ and Found Herself
In her memoir, “More,” Molly Roden Winter recounts the highs and lows of juggling an open marriage with work and child care.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/13/books/molly-roden-winter-more-book-open-marriage.html
Being an upper middle class white woman who gets her daily heated-seats struggles detailed in the New York Times isn’t easy.
"Found herself" in multiple beds, fuck-swings, locker rooms, dungeons, and on top of the Empire State Building naked?
🙂
😉
"How a Polyamorous Mom Had ‘a Big Sexual Adventure’ and Found Herself"
How a Zoo-Curious Man Got Into Gay Furry Porn and Found Himself
How a Professional Wanker Discovered Peeping Into Other Peoples Windows and Found Himself
How an Unemployed Georgian Troll Discovered Kiddie Porn and Found Himself
https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1748077340117045283
BREAKING: Chinese Communist Party cash is flooding UPenn, the home of Joe Biden's think tank.
UPENN raked in $25 million in contributions from entities and individuals in China from mid 2022-mid 2023.
https://twitter.com/jameslynch32/status/1747657372107948152
Ex-Delaware AUSA Lesley Wolf got a cushy new job after leaving the DOJ amid scrutiny over how she appeared to protect Joe & Hunter Biden from scrutiny during her time on the Hunter case.
https://twitter.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/1747725267383022059
NEW:
@MarcoPolo501c3
discovered that Lesley Wolf's PA Bar info changed within the last 24 hours. LinkedIn, too. The Democrat DOJ operative who covered for
@JoeBiden
has landed softly at
@BallardSpahrLLP
, unsurprisingly, given the firm's donation history.
It pays to use your state powers for democrats against their enemies.
Hunter Biden And Kevin Morris Set Up Unusual Payment Structure For $875,000 Art Purchase, Testimony shows
https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/16/hunter-biden-kevin-morris-payment-art-purchase-testimony/
Hunter Biden appeared to use his substantial art sales to pay off the loan debt owed to his fixer who paid off Hunter’s overdue taxes and funded his lifestyle.
Hunter Biden’s art gallerist Georges Berges testified in January before the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, and described to lawmakers how Hunter and his financier, Hollywood attorney Kevin Morris, used an $875,000 art sale to allow Hunter to pay back loan debt he owed to Morris, according to a transcript reviewed by the Daily Caller....
Free markets!
https://twitter.com/JewishWarrior13/status/1747993034204090693
IDF is releasing letters that were captured in one of the Hamas commanders' houses; the letters show that teachers in Gaza schools are Hamas terrorists; the letters were addressed to the teacher's superiors, asking them to release the teachers for Hamas military training ten days before 10/7
This should come as a surprise to no sentient being.
One of the things that bugs me about the narrative (and this is on both sides) is the continued referrals by media and pundits to Hamas as a 'terrorist organization' and not to what they are in this context - the dictatorship governing the territory. It creates this false narrative that somehow the Gazan people as a whole are something separate from and uninfluenced by Hamas (which is what all the quibbling about moral equivalency in attacking Gaza and injuring civilians are rooted in).
My stock response to any 'don't you sympathize with the poor Gazan civilians' question has been "Yes, as much as I would sympathize with the average North Korean if their country had decided to launch a war by invading and massacring the populace in South Korea."
Even to the point of "The IDF shot Palestinian civilians lighting garbage on fire in the streets."
You were just accidentally caught up lighting some garbage on fire... in a war zone... that everyone in virtually every corner of the globe knew to evacuate days ago... when the regime you accidentally appointed to power precipitated a war... by attacking and killing innocent civilians.
https://twitter.com/BillMelugin_/status/1748032653033669040
NEW: An illegal immigrant from Haiti charged with raping a developmentally disabled person in Boston was released from jail into the community after the sanctuary jurisdiction in Dorchester refused to honor ICE’s detainer request. ICE in Boston just found & rearrested him, and they call the local decision to release him without notice “disturbing”.
ICE statement: “Disturbingly and despite our filing an immigration detainer, this individual was released back into the community by the criminal court. The men and women of ERO Boston continue to protect the community from those who pose a real public safety threat to our communities.”
The man will now stay in federal ICE custody until his local rape charges are adjudicated - then ICE will seek to deport him.
Background: The Haitian man first arrived at a port of entry in Brownsville, TX in December 2022, where he was deemed inadmissible & released into the U.S. with a future court date.
In September 2023, Boston police arrested him for rape and indecent assault and battery on a disabled person. ICE filed a detainer request with local authorities in Dorchester, seeking his custody, but the request was ignored, and the alleged rapist was released into the community in November. ICE found & rearrested him a little over a week ago.
I'm very confused as to why he was released into the country if he was deemed inadmissible.
I am old enough to remember when the advertised purpose of sanctuary districts was to protect victims of, and witnesses to crimes, not asking about their immigration status so that they can report crimes to police without fear of deportation.
Now it is about protecting violent criminals.
I'm very confused as to, when we say "a developmentally disabled person", are we obfuscating their gender on the behalf of the perp, talking about an actually developmentally disabled biological woman, or talking about a regular man or woman who has voluntarily retarded themselves into thinking they're the opposite sex?
I'm pretty sure we're all talking about a developmentally disabled biological woman but I can't fathom why you wouldn't just say that except to mentally disable the people you were speaking to as well.
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1748069885672919200
Bob Menendez, indicted on corruption charges amid allegations of a pay-to-play scheme with foreign governments, now attending classified briefing with Antony Blinken. Asked by
@tedbarrettcnn
and
@morgan_rimmer
to respond to concerns about his attendance, he said: “Look to my past answers.”
He’s got the magic (D).
'The U.S. is currently dealing with a strange mix of high inflation and low joblessness.'
Not only that, the U.S. is dealing with a strange mix of how people calculate official numbers for inflation and joblessness.
At least we don't have to worry about food prices with all those books getting cooked.
"Did you hear they doubled the potato ration?"
Yes, from 25 grams to 20 grams.
Do you work for the Fed?
Nothing more libertarian than endless war:
Nikki Haley is banking on an avalanche of campaign spending in New Hampshire, where she has the best chance of gaining momentum on Donald Trump before Super Tuesday.
Much of it is undisclosed, dark money.
The recently formed "Independents Moving the Needle," a new Super PAC, just unveiled a $1 million television ad spend across N.H., which showcases former Trump voters endorsing Haley.
The group was registered last November by Jonathan Bush, the cousin of former President George W. Bush. News reports link the group to billionaire CEO Frank Laukien, but given its late registration, the group does not have to disclose any donors before voters go to the polls.
The biggest flow of opaque pro-Haley money comes from the network helmed by billionaire Charles Koch through his organization, Americans for Prosperity. Koch, who amassed a fortune through oil pipelines, refineries, paper plants, and a range of industrial products, created a political network that rivals the size and scope of the two major political parties. It is a coalition effort by Koch and like-minded conservative billionaires.
In November, Americans for Prosperity formally endorsed Haley and threw its massive weight behind her candidacy.
This is the same Koch who basically gives you a free platform?
What a moron!
As an Iowan I am glad the ad money has gone there instead of here.
'Read this heartbreaking story about the migrants in New York City who have been sleeping in the snow, awaiting ID cards issued by the state that are necessary precursors to finding legal work.'
NEEDZ MOAR EMPATHY!
Read the story and say "well, it's about damn time!".
European Members of Parliament (MEPs) have voted to keep its contracts with Pfizer and other Covid-19 “vaccine” companies a secret, successfully blocking public access to vital data regarding the EU’s dealings with shady Big Pharma enterprises.
As always, the government needs to know all the details of the public's business, but the public must not know any of the details of the government's business.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1747953008225521757
This is Scott Kirby, the CEO of
@united
. He’s a drag queen and has been incorporating drag into
@united
.
This video should tell you everything you need to know.
Where are all the drag kings to keep these queens in their place?
What the fvck is supposed to be so hilarious?
All of it was just terrible. It made Gretchen Whitmer’s TikTok video look polished and well rehearsed.
It’s almost to the point where the insane Johnny-come-Joanna-come-latelies are no longer just parodying women and are even parodying female impersonators, themselves, into retarded oblivion.
A fine demonstration on how you lose the “Is it porn or is it art?” debate by demonstrating that it’s not even art.
Powerful men who get easy sex become perverts, news at eleven.
I'm not offended sexually, I'm offended as a rational, pattern-discerning mammal with limbs, eyes, and ears. That was more awful than everyone backhandedly complimenting Ellen Degeneres by saying her terrible dancing made her more relatable and humanized her.
"Out of my way Hillary Clinton and Lena Dunham, let a real gargoyle show you how to make the winged monkeys clap."
'"Every booster you take, you're more likely to get COVID as a result of it," said Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently. (That's not true, writes Reason's Ronald Bailey.)'
But who said, "Every booster you get guarantees you will not get COVID"?
No one ever.
Fauci very much said if you get the vaccine you will not get COVID.
Fauci is my definition of 'no one'.
I have to wonder if you are really on a cruise on a ship as big as Icon. I also noted reports that serious cruisers are opting for smaller ships and more intimate experiences. I think there is a place for both and I know where I would want to be.
I've done cruises on ships much larger;)
I would rather be at home.
More seriously though - there's nothing 'intimate' about a smaller ship either. You're out on the water, if you're not working what are you doing? Getting drunk within the confines of a floating hotel until it docks so you can go somewhere.
They say the journey is more important than the destination - if this were true then you could just leave the cruise ship moored at its departure pier and spend a week on it then head home as soon as you get sick of it.
I've been on one of those, though it was for a weekend and you do have to go out to sea far enough where gambling laws at the departure pier do not apply.
Tripping balls and playing craps for two days in a floating hotel - not bad. Especially since I won enough money the first night to pay for the whole thing and still leave with extra cash.
You’re out on the water, if you’re not working what are you doing?
Can I answer your questions with a few of questions?
1. Blue, Green, or Brown water?
2. Could you clarify where, exactly, between getting drunk in the floating hotel and getting drunk outside the floating hotel whatever vacation taboo violation it is taking place occurs?
A (quasi-)legitimate answer to your question: I'm not drinking within the confines of a floating hotel, I'm (selectively) observing my dive training and abstaining from the hot tub, alcohol, and air travel as the nitrogen sublimates out of my blood between destinations/dives.
I think the only cruise I'd be willing to do is on a smaller boat to a place difficult to travel around except by ship such as Antarctica or parts of Alaska.
The only thing worse than a floating hotel is a sinking hotel.
THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN'T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL 'ROGUE COP' OR 'BAD APPLE.' SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH 'GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.'
That's pretty illuminating. He defends bad cops and lumps himself in with them. Wow.
Indeed.
For once I am agreeing with sarc. Except for the illuminating part. We already knew this.
"Shove their head into the doorjam and seize their assets" -
(Donnie to cops on how to handle suspects)
No wonder the loudest Trump supporters in the comments mock QI reform and any other effort to reign in the police.
I'm no Trump supporter, but I've been very critical (and effective) on criticizing QI reform. Namely because:
1. It won't work
2. It hasn't work where "reform" has already taken place.
3. Democrats who by every metric aren't Trump supporters will never allow QI to happen, even if you convinced 742% of Republicans to support it, because Democrats are the biggest beneficiaries of it.
4. It's the Jones Act of Making Baltimore Great Again.
Only because you define 'work' as 'silver bullet.' There is no silver bullet to fix abuse of power by the police. But QI reform would be a step in the right direction. Why? Incentives. As it is police know they can't be sued, so they make a point of abusing their power. Because fuck you that's why. QI reform would take that incentive away.
Only because you define ‘work’ as ‘silver bullet.’
No, I define "work" as "has a meaningful impact on police abuse that is markedly better or statistically significant in curbing police abuse".
There is no silver bullet to fix abuse of power by the police.
This is where we agree to disagree. Well, maybe you're right, maybe not "silver bullet", but making public sector unions illegal, especially in high sensitivity positions that deal with the public would be the biggest, most dramatic sea-change in how we can insert accountability back into the government.
Why? Incentives. As it is police know they can’t be sued, so they make a point of abusing their power. Because fuck you that’s why. QI reform would take that incentive away.
No it wouldn't and I've made my arguments clear, no one has refuted them, and even Reason's articles which cheered on how "State X has done their own QI reform!!11!!" did exactly what I said would happen: The officers were indemnified against lawsuit.
I'm with you on no public unions.
As far as indemnification goes, that's a separate issue.
Personally I think requiring cops to carry insurance similar to malpractice insurance would go a long way. But it wouldn't matter without people being allowed to sue them, which would require QI reform.
I never hear this mentioned by others, but I would pair ending QI with instituting a loser-pays tort system.
The argument against ending QI always includes the scenario that criminals will just sue into bankruptcy even the cops who aren't doing anything wrong. Okay, well let's have a system where if you sue someone and lose, you have to pay the legal fees of the one you sued. This will greatly reduce the frivolous or fraudulent suits, while giving an avenue for suing the bad cops directly. Trial lawyers will still be willing to file lawsuits against obviously corrupt, evil cops on a pro-bono basis, as they'll likely win the suit, so the worst apples will have to answer with their wallet for abuses.
Do you have a cite or a link for such a quote?
It is a paraphrased composite of two quotes of his. And yes, I took the liberty to use marks on a paraphrase.
You can't be this ignorant. You know he supports Asset theft and roughing up suspects as he has said it.
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
Don't mistake dishonesty for ignorance.
Did you look in a mirror first before saying that?
Do you sneer when you shout "No you!" like a teenage girl?
Do you even know what Buttplug actually posted?
Did you click on another of his links?
Will you ever learn...
No links were shown for Shrike's claims. Stop defending him.
A paraphrased composite isn't a real quote. Should we do the same to Biden? To you?
It can be if it's a tight paraphrasing, but if you completely reinterpret meaning...
True, but Turd does have a way of completely reinterpreting the meaning, and does have a past history of lying his ass off.
If it is a turd post, it is a lie. Been wrong once or twice, but those were accidents on turd's part.
turd lies, as he's doing here.
He's paraphrasing things you know Trump has said, so instead of addressing what Trump said you're attacking him for paraphrasing. Seems about right. Always attack. Never address the topic.
Sarc, if any other poster besides spb or jeff used a "paraphrased composite" you would immediately call it a lie.
Not true. Even if it was, which it isn't, appeal to hypocrisy is a fallacy that doesn't make someone wrong.
You're a lying pile of steaming lefty shit. Fuck off and die, asshole.
There is nothing fallacious about pointing out hypocrisy. You display hypocrisy every day. Rarely to sometimes, you're even right despite the hypocrisy.
Tu quoque is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent’s argument by attacking the opponent’s own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, therefore accusing hypocrisy. This specious reasoning is a special type of ad hominem attack.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
Thank you, Master Logician, for the wikipedia cut/paste, which is not relevant to my comments toward you.
Calling you a hypocrite is not tu quoque, nor ad hominem, unless I were to say an argument of yours is wrong because of it.
But, Sarc, that's not personal behavior, it's actually related to the argument you're making, thus tu quoque does not apply.
So you're just whining then. K, I'll ignore such comments in the future.
it’s actually related to the argument you’re making
How so? The only point to saying "you would have done the same thing nya nya nya" is to invalidate what was said.
"So you’re just whining then."
Sarc, your daily posts are filled with whining. You can't do the same schtick day after day, and also complain about people calling you out.
Dude, you're arguing against what you claim I would do, not anything I've actually done.
Sarc, if any other poster besides spb or jeff used a “paraphrased composite” you would immediately call it a lie.
If that's what I do, point it out when I do it. But don't accuse me of something I did in your imagination.
If that’s what I do, point it out when I do it. But don’t accuse me of something I did in your imagination.
We do. You then proceed to bitch, whine, piss, and moan over it.
What ITL said.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
“Shove their head into the doorjam and seize their assets” –
(Donnie to cops on how to handle suspects)
Like most of turds posts, this is a lie he hopes if it's repeated often enough, someone will be as stupid as he is and believe it.
Anyone who saw the clip and took it as other than a joke is a turd-level TDS-addled ignoramus stupid enough to believe this:
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2
April.20.2021 at 10:47 pm
“Ashli Babbitt attacked the USA much like the 9/11 hijackers did.”
“”Reckon for a moment with what it is Trump is actually endorsing here: a literal prescription for strongman-style dictatorship,” writes National Review’s Jeffrey Blehar.”
So is “reckon” going to be the new folksy word journalists and twitter users are going to use? Like they did with “ya’ll”? I’ll wait patiently for them to throw in a “by crikey!” sometime in the near future.
Reckon I could see that becoming a strategy. **spits high-priced spittin tobacky into a spittoon** CLINK!
And those capitalist cruise ships? Even worse, they are full of people who might vote for Trump!
(Any decent people who want a boat ride compete with virtue points to get invited to Greta's sailboat.)
And that satellite photo of North Korea at night? That is not just a communist utopia, it demonstrates the WEF vision for all of us: crapping in a communal bucket in the dark, while the few elite enjoy cocktails on the patio, lit by strings of electric party lights (powered by Youth Corps kids on bicycle generators).
Late stage capitalism is so absurdly comical at times.
Why do all these Leftist jerks speak of "Late Stage Capitalism" as if they know it is about to fall, as if they even know what time it is, and as if full-fledged Laissez-Faire Capitalism has ever existed?
🙂
😉
Soros and Schwab told them so.
A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION
Fatass Donnie is a true fascist. Not a genocidal fascist like Hitler but a fascist in form and mind and style.
His Cult confirms this. Fat Leader can do no wrong and is above the law. When I see bootlicks like Mothers Lament bow to him it confirms everything.
We want a strongman in control to smite our enemies. So what if that has historically turned into an oppressive autocracy? Trump is different! It will be different this time!
"We want a strongman in control to smite our enemies."
Well you're in luck. Astroturfed "insurrections", invented charges against political opponents, online censorship campaigns, kangaroo courts, the whole nine yards. You've got it all right now.
And has cheered the state while mocking the victims at every step.
And you want to give Joe Biden total immunity?
Not us, but you do.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Sevo the Bootlick.
Sevo makes me think of the Crazy Old Man on the Simpsons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRgNbis14pE&pp=ygUVY3Jhenkgb2xkIG1hbiBzaW5nZXJz
Sarc reminds me of the drunk falling over the curb, griping about how unfair the world is.
Stuff your head up your ass and die, steaming pile of lefty shit,
Sarc reminds me of a fifteen-year-old who got in an internet forum fight and now spends his day trolling all his "enemies"... but drunker.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
“Fatass Donnie” is gonna be your president one year from today.
Haha. That’s hilarious no matter what.
We're not doing the 'mean tweets!' thing again are we Wolfe?
Were we ever not doing the mean tweets?
Well, to be fair, he posted it on Truth. Twitter has tweets, but what do they call posts on that platform? Truths?
Propaganda?
>"Reckon for a moment with what it is Trump is actually endorsing here: a literal prescription for strongman-style dictatorship," writes National Review's Jeffrey Blehar. "A thugocracy. The Great Leader and his goons may commit some crimes here and there, but let that slide for the greater good."
Buddy, you already support it. You voted for it. Several times already. Trump just wants it extended to *him*.
'Read this heartbreaking story about the migrants in New York City who have been sleeping in the snow, awaiting ID cards issued by the state that are necessary precursors to finding legal work.'
I know some place where it's warm this time of year . . .
Texas?
dude the wind chill is 12 in Dallas right now
Isn't wind chill what you pull out when you are trying to sound like a victim? It's like 40 deg out....but the wind chill.
TBF, the high today is like 35, so cold as fuck for us Dallasites.
Havana?
Cuba?
Cozumel is absolutely lovely right now. 😀
I'll bet. Haven't been there in years, but last time it was nice.
"where he was deemed inadmissible" but admitted anyway by direct written order of dictator Biden.
Sounds like "a literal prescription for strongman-style dictatorship,"
>Controversial opinion over here but I think it's fine—good, even—for pastors to live out their faiths by sheltering the homeless when it's freezing outside. (The state of Ohio disagrees.)
Pastors, yes. The state of Ohio - no.
Just for the record:
• Governor Mike DeWine (R)
• Lieutenant Governor Jon Husted (R)
Legislature General Assembly
• Upper house Senate
• Lower house House of Representatives
Judiciary Supreme Court of Ohio
U.S. senators Sherrod Brown (D)
J. D. Vance (R)
U.S. House delegation
10 Republicans
5 Democrats
Am I mistaken in thinking that this is the same Ohio pastor who was housing them in his garage and got into trouble when police/fire showed up because someone saw copious amounts of smoke/steam emanating from the impromptu heat sources that had been set up in the garage?
I don’t really want bumcicles lining the streets either but asphyxiated by carbon monoxide or burned to death en masse isn’t any better and discovering the hard way that the facilities in the church are a public toilets for large groups of homeless people isn’t exactly good for anybody either.
but asphyxiated by carbon monoxide or burned to death en masse isn’t any better and discovering the hard way that the facilities in the church are a public toilets for large groups of homeless people isn’t exactly good for anybody either.
If it's achieved by the free market, then what's to complain about?
*cough* *cough*
Bidenomics delivers again:
"US Employment Reports Greatly Exaggerated, Over 400,000 Jobs Mistakenly Added to Total"
https://ijr.com/us-employment-reports-greatly-exaggerated/
The ass-clown turd hardest hit.
Ibram X. Kendi's How to Be an Antiracist is stocked in 42 percent of the school districts studied by James Fishback for The Free Press. But Fishback only found one school district where John McWhorter's Woke Racism—which pushes back on Kendi's ideas—was stocked.
I believe that based on current metrics, that means McWhorter's book has been banned.
Wow, I didn’t know Elizabeth Warren was at Davos
You know how some people are bewildered by "How did the German people get to the point that they were genociding The Jews?"
Well, with this video and all the back and forth of globalization and colonization it should be pretty clear *exactly* how European settlers in North America contracted themselves into their own "Manifest Destiny" with the natives.
I'm still trying to figure out why we quote-tweeted Elon Musk on that video. The original video was alarming and funny enough on its own.
I half agree, half appreciate Musk's frank, common sense/everyman take. Fuck 'em.
Seriously, I’m confused as to how that First Nations, or whatever, person even remotely believes that the people she’s blessing or entertaining, or whatever, at the WEF give a single fuck between the six of them about anything she’s doing and aren’t actively thinking to themselves, “If I had to tear down your native villages to build solar farms and make all your people’s children mine lithium for three generations in order to save this planet, I would.”
Gates took it like communion head up back arched … weirdo
she’s blessing or entertaining, or whatever
I thought she was trying to give them covid, coughing on them like that. I mean, her mask was painted on! She reverse small-pox-blanketed those colonizers.
Let's hope.
"the Supreme Court, which will need to rule on this sooner rather than later due to how far into election season we're getting."
Innocent question: Since when did the Supreme Court start doing what it needed to do, sooner OR later? Inquiring minds want to know!
Did you catch Trump's gratuitous little plea at the end?
In other words, "HEY SUPREME COURT, YOU OWE ME ONE!"
Of course. You think it's okay for the Supreme Court to delay their decision when there's a ballot approaching?
Yes. Trump is entirely wrong to pretend Presidents have complete immunity. The Supreme Courts very JOB is to limit the powers of congress and the executive. Trump says some really stupid sh*t sometimes and if it wasn't for his past administration proving he has no intent on carrying through the stupid sh*t he says I'd jump ship.
That said. Immunity from what? Being witch-hunted by [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s]? Seems the subject at hand writes its own immunity by any logical sense of the word justice itself.
Complete immunity is something no other official has.
If they're going to do it, they could save us some future aggro and just say, "Only President Trump has total immunity."
That's because if you look at the facts, such "immunity" would be justified. But you simply don't get it.
Every politician in US history has been at risk of prosecution for "crimes" committed while in office or crimes committed because of their office. "Immunity" was never, as far as I know, intended to cover crimes. It was intended to prevent individuals from being penalized for doing their official jobs correctly while inadvertently causing harm - either intentionally or collaterally - even by doing that job badly. I suppose the assumption is that we could never get anyone competent to serve in office if they were at risk of losing everything because the office itself was risky. Having said that, we do NOT want the kind of official who intentionally does harm while in office to be protected. That ambiguity - plus the recent weaponization of the justice apparatus for obviously political reasons - is where the source of the current issue lies.
On the other hand, watching politicians hoist by their own petards – namely thousands of laws, regulations and administrative procedures that they themselves enacted in order to wield power against the sheeple is delicious; and watching the D’s and R’s slowly but surely destroy each other and themselves is just like dessert!
So that's the silver lining....
Since the issue of to what degree a President has constitutional immunity for actions taken during their term as part of their (perceived or actual) duties - pushing for the extreme position makes sense.
I'm of the mind that the only way to minimize potential for political retaliation is to follow the strict interpretation of the wording and only allow criminal trials to proceed after a successful impeachment. Not perfect and creates hypothetical loopholes, but the alternative is to force courts to decide what actions a President took constitute 'part of their office' or not.
(Of course, McWhorter isn’t the only corrective for Kendi’s terrible book, but I think Fishback’s point still stands; read the full piece for more.)
Kendi’s book is a pretty good corrective for Kendi’s book.
Side observation: You know something positive is going on at Reason when Kendi is made fun of in a morning lynx post.
>>something positive is going on at Reason
ya my complaint is I only have time for morning HnR now because it’s too full of interest lol
edit: just noticing the they/them, lolz.
awaiting ID cards issued by the state that are necessary precursors to finding legal work.
But not voting.
Citizenship, however, is.
Yet that's not what the Democrats are thinking of.
Trump also seems to be gesturing toward qualified immunity—the legal doctrine that allows cops to get away with bad behavior if their misconduct was not "clearly established" via a prior court ruling—and acting as if we ought to expand such a thing instead of scrapping it.
I agree with the criticisms of the scope of qualified immunity that was written by Reason's authors.
Nevertheless, it is the klaw unless and un til the Supreme Court abolishes it. As such, qualified immunity should require the dismissal of these indictments against Trump, for the acts they allege do not violate clearly established law.
I’m sympathetic to the claim against presidential immunity. But, honestly, I am highly suspicious that if we go that direction, it will last any more than fifteen minutes after it is used against Donald Trump. And that’s my problem here. Even if a principle the regime is using against Donald Trump is a good and legitimate one, we can be reasonably certain that it will only be used on a one-off basis against someone the regime doesn’t like. I mean anyone remember James Comey saying Hilary Clinton broke the law, but no prosecutor would go after her? Does anyone think if we curtail presidential immunity, war crimes cases against Bush and Obama will go forward? And if a principle is only selectively applied, it isn’t really a principle. After all, I’ve no doubt Adolph Hitler supported free speech for Nazis and Joseph Stalin supported free speech for loyal communists. But, I’m pretty sure neither of us would label them committed libertarians.
Fortunately, in contrast with absolute immunity for anything the President does while in office, we have qualified immunity which immunizes officials from being taken to court unless the act in question violated clearly established law.
Despite criticisms by many commenters and authors here, qualified immunity is still law, an d these indictments must not stand due to qualified immunity.
qualified immunity is still law
Qualified immunity is not law, it's court doctrine.
Until the Supreme Court overrules it.
It definitely applies to these indictments against Trump.
But, that sort of gets to my point. Let's say qualified immunity isn't applied here, to Wolfe's and a lot of commenters' here applause. Does anyone really think for a minute that that will mean qualified immunity will go away? To even suggest as much is laughable. We aren't going to see the federal government and bureaucracy open itself up to lawsuits or punishment just because they didn't extend that immunity to Donald Trump. It'll be memory-holed and extended claims (beyond Donald Trump) will be ridiculed out of polite society. And that will be that.
Wolfe is kinda passively engaging in it herself. Again, we've been extrajudicially assassinating American civilians on foreign soil for at least 3 administrations now. People complained that we shouldn't be doing it, but nobody raised a peep about QI. Sure, somebody died but, you know, no grounds.
Now that it is some shithole DA on completely novel charges that her boyfriend is investigating, suddenly "Executive QI" imperils all of Western Civilization.
I mean, FFS, remember the compare/contrast of Reality Winner, Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, and Edward Snowden to Hillary "No reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" Clinton?
Despite criticisms by many commenters and authors here, qualified immunity is still law, an d these indictments must not stand due to qualified immunity.
But qualified immunity only protects against civil lawsuits, not criminal charges.
The argument that it should apply to all criminal charges is even greater.
https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/qualified-immunity-legal-practical-moral-failure
As a matter of fact, every criminal prosecution should be dismissed absent an allegation of conduct that violated "clearly established law".
Otherwise, we have situations like the Rick Perry indictment.
It's not so much THAT Trump has been charged with "crimes" as it is WHAT "crimes" he has been charged with. Those laws are so egregiously nebulous and vague, and the actions he has been charged with in violation of those laws are so ludicrous that the effect is clearly "weaponization of the justice system for political purposes rather than public safety.
All 91 criminal charges are "egregiously nebulous and vague". C'mon, even you don't believe that.
I do believe that.
>> he wrote on his TruthSocial platform
more people saw it here than there.
>>Wow, I didn’t know Elizabeth Warren was at Davos
gold. mme. dillinger asked why they wall want covid.
I'd say LOL, but it's actually cringe worthy. These are supposed to be the best and the brightest? That primitive mystic mumbo-jumbo nonsense fits perfectly well with what they're doing there.
See above. They are the best and brightest. What you're witnessing is how the white man convinces the natives to march themselves to the reservation for the future of mankind and the good of everyone involved.
May as well have asked her for some wampum in exchange for a trillion dollars in green energy credits after the "blessing".
The fact that so many white (and other) people will recognize the "genocide" that people, with nowhere near the global, scientific, and cultural understanding of Bill Gates, perpetrated two centuries ago but see that and think "OMG! How cosmopolitan and inclusive of them!" is truly fucking diabolical.
the white man convinces the natives to march themselves to the reservation for the future of mankind and the good of everyone involved.
We will call them civilized tribes, and we can get the newspapers to run stories with the headlines "Indians Vow to Endeavor to Persevere".
>>"Reckon for a moment with what it is Trump is actually endorsing here: a literal prescription for strongman-style dictatorship," writes National Review's Jeffrey Blehar.
National Review should cite you not the other way around. Unless your secret goal is to bring down National Review via general mockery in which case I'm on board.
>>On this week's Just Asking Questions, we chat with Matt Welch
I'm sorry. was the entire eastern seaboard busy?
>>I think it's fine—good, even—for pastors to live out their faiths by sheltering the homeless when it's freezing outside. (The state of Ohio disagrees.)
Ohio shall make no law ...
>>Latin America "enjoys some other, less obvious, advantages in today's troubled world:
I've been led to believe CCP is a huge fan of the local fare.
The migrants in NYC aren't out looking for work, they're laying in bed on cots all day doing not much of anything but staring at their phones, fighting with each other and stealing from one another. There aren't enough unskilled labor jobs for them here. Not sure what they were expecting when they came here, but this probably isn't it. Should've gone to China if they wanted work. Oh wait, they can't.
Buttplug, better lock your doors. Looks like you might have to face your comeuppance.
https://redstate.com/jeffc/2024/01/18/bikers-against-predators-hunts-down-pedophiles-in-the-heartland-leading-to-multiple-arrests-n2168918
Better clean up those corpses in your basement now, Buttplug.
Better destroy your HDD, you mean.
What is causing you do go to great lengths to defend a blatant pedo like Shrike? Are you hiding something from us? Hmm?
Wow, I didn't know Elizabeth Warren was at Davos
Based.
SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH 'GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.'
Anyone else get the impression that Trump didn't write this? Seems too humble, conciliatory, and cogent/sage for him.
I mean, of course the Presstards interpret it as "He's trying to say he should be granted immunity to kill people!", like sitting administrations haven't been extrajudicially executing American citizens for 3(... 4?) administrations now.
But what he's actually saying "I'm not perfect but if any given activist DA can strangle the Executive on any cockamamie charge they'd use to indict a ham sandwich it will tear the system apart." is surprisingly not "She's a terrible, horrible, mean-spirited evil person who hates democracy and is just wrong in every way. Completely wrong."
But what he’s actually saying
is what he's actually saying, not what you're trying to claim he meant.
Oh sh*t that never happens.. I mean if I like my doctor I can keep my doctor or something, something....
That was incorrect and possibly a lie. And irrelevant to the point.
Trump's prose is inimitable. It's obvious when somebody else has manned the golden iPhone. The question is why? Why now?
Because he can. Objections?
Read this heartbreaking story about the migrants in New York City who have been sleeping in the snow, awaiting ID cards issued by the state that are necessary precursors to finding legal work.
Just fuck off with this shit.
I hear it's warm in El Salvador
No, Kooky Ass Retard, but thanks for asking.
At least you own it. 😉
Are you KAR?
Is their sex abuse any different than schools, the Boy Scouts, priests in the Catholic Church, or in other places?
Yes, it's KAR, aka Kooky Ass Retard.
>>the Boy Scouts, priests in the Catholic Church
theirs is more about girls?
People who make up a religion turn out to be controlling and abusive?
Who'd a thunk it...
@ObviouslyNotSpam
Who would’a thunk it? Pretentious bigots like you and Lynn. And it’s all lies.
Statistics show that abuse is no more likely to occur in the LDS Church than in any other religion, or any organization for that matter, including the Boy Scouts of America. And contrary to Lynn’s claim, there’s no evidence that either Joseph Smith nor Brigham Young sexually abused anybody, nor is there any evidence that they knowingly lied about their beliefs.