New York Wants To Help More International Students Become Entrepreneurs
The plan will help provide “university-sponsored visas that allow them to continue performing and commercializing research without leaving the state.”

International students have few workable options to stay in the United States after graduating, even though most say they would like to do so. Instead, many leave and put their training to use elsewhere, depriving the U.S. economy of a skilled—and often entrepreneurial—work force.
New York state could start chipping away at that problem. Last week, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul announced 204 new policy proposals as part of her 2024 State of the State address. The agenda features a section on creating "new avenues for immigrant entrepreneurs," which will allow certain "graduate and doctoral students…to obtain university-sponsored visas that allow them to continue performing and commercializing research without leaving the state."
International students earned "more than 44% of graduate degrees in STEM awarded by SUNY in 2020–2021," it continues. "But many graduates are unable to secure visas and are forced to leave New York and start companies abroad."
In addition to the university-based visa pathway, Hochul's plan will involve Empire State Development, a state economic development agency, "offer[ing] competitive grants to research universities and colleges to retain international entrepreneurs who would otherwise be unable to launch start-ups in New York."
"In the absence of Congress taking action on immigration reform and creating a 'startup visa,' states need to know they can create programs like this one as a vehicle for innovation and economic growth," says Tahmina Watson, an immigration lawyer and author of The Startup Visa. "State-centric immigration policies have to be the way forward."
Policies that capitalize on the efforts and energy of immigrants could be especially beneficial in New York, which "has seen a steep decline in economic dynamism post-pandemic," notes Connor O'Brien, research and policy analyst at the Economic Innovation Group. "Its startup ecosystem has fallen behind much of the country."
"New York is home to a high-quality, affordable public university network that trains so many students with entrepreneurial potential," O'Brien continues. "Providing more avenues for foreign-born startup founders to stay in-state after graduation and grow their businesses in New York is a win-win."
Though Hochul's plan is short on detail, it seems to mirror the Global Entrepreneur in Residence (GEIR) programs that have been implemented around the country. GEIR programs allow universities and research nonprofits to sponsor immigrant entrepreneurs, who would otherwise likely have to try to get an H-1B visa. Demand for these visas far exceeds the annual cap of 85,000, and they're randomly allocated, meaning many talented people who may eventually become successful entrepreneurs never get their ticket to the United States.
Universities are uniquely positioned to avoid those roadblocks because they're exempt from the annual H-1B cap. GEIR programs capitalize on that, allowing universities to take on foreign entrepreneurs as employees.
Only a handful of universities have adopted GEIR programs, and several of these initiatives are still young, but they've reported some good results. Since 2014, foreign entrepreneurs sponsored by the University of Massachusetts Amherst have started companies that employ nearly 1,700 people and have raised over $1 billion in funding. Eight foreign entrepreneurs based at the University of Michigan have raised $15.6 million in funding since 2019. Other GEIR programs are bringing entrepreneurs to economically depressed cities, including Cleveland and Detroit.
"Research has consistently shown that the foreign-born not just have a higher entrepreneurial propensity," says Dane Stangler, managing director of strategic initiatives at the Bipartisan Policy Center, "but are also overrepresented among high-tech startups, venture-backed startups, [and] AI startups most recently."
Stangler cautions that observers should take the available job creation and fundraising numbers with a grain of salt. "It's one thing to say, 'Hey, we've created X number of jobs, X number of money.' I don't necessarily disbelieve that, but it doesn't appear to me that rigorous, independent, third-party evaluation has been done of that," he says.
New York may face problems implementing certain aspects of Hochul's international entrepreneur plan. For one, Empire State Development, which has been directed to offer grants to universities to retain immigrant entrepreneurs, hasn't exactly been the most effective distributor of economic development funds. Reason's Eric Boehm reported in 2022 that Empire State Development threw $750 million in subsidies at a solar energy project near Buffalo, with then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo saying it would create 3,000 jobs. It created just 700.
Startups are inherently risky ventures, and New York's plan may well shift that risk onto taxpayers. But it's still a good idea to open up avenues for universities to sponsor international entrepreneurs, getting around a major problem in the country's high-skilled immigration system. Other localities need not replicate New York's grant allocation plan, and it remains to be seen how costly that plan will be.
Ultimately, programs like this capitalize on an already-present talent force, in a way that may promote more growth and attract more future entrepreneurs. "Clusters of highly-skilled technical people, and of entrepreneurs in particular, build on themselves, attracting further investment and talent," O'Brien wrote.
"Leverage what you already have. You already have a lot of potential entrepreneurial talent in your universities," says Stangler. "What can you do to tie them into the ecosystems? What can you do to tie them into potential employers in those startup ecosystems?"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So the mayor of the largest city in New York state is saying illegal immigrants are breaking their budget, and the governor of New York state tells them to hold her beer?
I'm just so heart broken that these college graduates who came here expressly for an education don't get to leverage that into permanent underclass status here in the United States which, for the record, is still better than their underclass situation abroad.
Meanwhile, it would appear that almost 50% of graduates from these programs are foreign born. Does that number strike anyone else as insane?
Policies that capitalize on the efforts and energy of immigrants could be especially beneficial in New York, which "has seen a steep decline in economic dynamism post-pandemic," notes Connor O'Brien, research and policy analyst at the Economic Innovation Group. "Its startup ecosystem has fallen behind much of the country."
Yeah, I'm sure the startup climate in New York is the fault of the pandemic and not the New York legislature.
Read the following report to learn how a single-mom with 3 kids was able to generate $89,844 of annual Qa income working in her spare time online from her home without selling...
For More Visit Here....> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Gadzooks, the state’s ass is all over these proposals. Can yee not smell the stench of misdirected assets?
The agenda features a section on creating “new avenues for immigrant entrepreneurs,” which will allow certain “graduate and doctoral students…to obtain university-sponsored visas that allow them to continue performing and commercializing research without leaving the state.”
In addition to the university-based visa pathway, Hochul’s plan will involve Empire State Development, a state economic development agency, “offer[ing] competitive grants to research universities and colleges to retain international entrepreneurs who would otherwise be unable to launch start-ups in New York.”
There’s nothing entrepreneurial about state-sponsored anything.
Liberty first.
Pragmatism is nice.
Fire KMW.
Get out of DC.
"Entrepreneur" isn't a profession. "What would you say you do here?"
Hooray for academic slavery!
Three cheers for educating future professors!
Taxpayer funded research so that the STEM fields prop up the genderqueer poetry of the 17th century undergrads.
Ny migrant students seem to love the enlightenment, western civilization and Jewish folks in particular.
Climate research, modern monetary economic research
Technology inserting itself into every aspect of the economy, paying the middleman/investors =inflation, mandates and bans
Technocrat Fascist harder NY
"International students have few workable options to stay in the United States after graduating"
If only they knew that before they came here - - - - - -
We need grants for
""offering competitive grants to research universities and colleges to retain international entrepreneurs . . . "
Despite
"are also overrepresented among high-tech startups, venture-backed startups, [and] AI startups most recently."
the fact that they don't need the money.
Plus they're always handy when you need some paid sign holders at leftist protests.
New York is the name of the state. What you mean is that the governor, other politicians and their cronies want to use the power of the State and taxpayer money to order things as they see fit.
Geez, 10 comments so far and nobody mentioned food trucks?
LOL.... Copying CA footsteps and their sanctuary cities I see.
While we're destroying the nation for foreigners looking for greener pastures to graze ... I'd like to propose neighboring State's of CA and NY be permitted to filter their borders since NY seems to think they have that authority.
So it’s illegal to have laws affecting only Hispanic gang members, but it’s okay to have laws benefiting only certain racial or ethnic groups because they’re going to college.
Considering each state as a laboratory, let's try this experiment in NY and see what happens. Making life easier for foreign entrepreneurs doesn't seem like a terrible idea.
The state is literally begging for federal funding to help their illegal immigration costs.
Irrelevant.
State employees are not entrepreneurs.
It depends how the employment is structured.
No. Provide any single example of government employees providing any new service or inventing any new goods that aren't for expanding government power. New forms don't count. New police surveillance methods don't count.
So no useful inventions from any public universities or other government research groups have ever been invented.
Plenty of public works projects get started by entrepreneurial state employees, who funnel the money to needy relatives who are contractors, and augment their own paltry state salaries and stingy benefits with finders' fees for their efforts.
CA already tried. Pretty sure they're still doing it.
There's your "doesn't seem like a terrible idea" dream state.
What have they tried? Is it identical to the NY approach? Where is your evidence that their programme failed?
You can't provide a lick of evidence that government has ever done anything competently or efficiently.
In this case, TJJ2000 made the assertion so it's up to him to prove it, not me to disprove it.
And "competence" and "efficiency" were not the standards though I know that some of you hold your statement as axiomatically true with no thought at all. In general government is not as competent or as efficient as the private sector. But unlike you I don't hold this as an unthinking axiomatic belief.
Any useful invention that a public university or government research body has made disproves your thesis, because such an invention displays both competence and relative efficiency.
So every state needs to be a laboratory of various versions of CA's sanctuary cities in order to make sure nothing particular doesn't work?
Here's an idea. How about keeping the border secure and the Union of States Government is responsible in preventing invasions by foreigners and/or granting immigration citizenship instead of having every State carry it's own immigration policy and invasion control.
Seriously ... What is it with the left-leaner. Whatever the US Constitution says just lobby for the exact opposite or what?
I don't require every state to copy one state. That kind of ruins the point of the 50 labs argument.
I would be totally with you if I saw no benefit in having a nation -- national defense government in the first place and was out to dismantle the Union of States very/mostly-only purpose for existence.
But I'm not.
Plenty of jobs in undocumented pharmaceutical sales already.
New York Wants To Help More International Students Become Entrepreneurs
How about helping white male Americans?
As a former NY'er, the ethnics who built NY are considered pos by the NYC elites..much of it goes back to Europe and old world greviences.
Grew up in NY.this is how the "program" will work..99 cents of every $1 will be mandated to be spent on "administrative" or some govt mandate to give money to well-connected elites..NGOs, DIE programs and so on. The Economic Development Agency has a history of blowing money on failed projects (The Rochester Fast Ferry is a classic one).