Damning Justice Department Report Finds Leadership Failures Led to Botched Uvalde Police Response
"Responding officers should have immediately recognized the incident as an active shooter situation," the report found.

A lengthy Justice Department report issued today found that the disastrous police response to the 2022 mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, was a result of a lack of leadership and failure to follow well-established principles for responding to active shooters.
The over 600-page review confirms what previous investigations by media outlets and Texas state agencies have reported: that the inexcusable delay in confronting the shooter for over an hour left children and teachers trapped and defenseless inside classrooms.
"The victims and survivors of the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School on May 24, 2022, deserved better," Attorney General Merrick Garland said at a Justice Department press conference today.
The most significant failure identified by the Justice Department's critical incident review of the mass shooting was that "responding officers should have immediately recognized the incident as an active shooter situation, using the resources and equipment that were sufficient to push forward immediately and continuously toward the threat until entry was made into classrooms."
Instead, because of erroneous information and poor communication, police treated the shooter as a barricaded suspect. That meant officers spent time waiting for additional equipment and trying to negotiate with the gunman. In one instance, they spent 15 minutes waiting for a set of keys to unlock a door that was likely unlocked all along. And it meant that survivors were trapped in rooms with the shooter for more than an hour after the first officers arrived on the scene.
The review found there was no incident command structure among the enormous number of police officers gathered at the school, leading to indecision and chaos both during and in the aftermath of the shooting.
At the Justice Department press conference, Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta described how the lack of leadership meant there was no plan to triage the numerous victims after the shooter was killed.
"Victims were moved away without appropriate precautions," Gupta said. "Children with bullet wounds were put on school buses without medical attention."
The report found that city and state officials spread inaccurate information at news conferences, not just about the police response but also the status of victims, which further added to the distress of the community.
As questions about the shooting mounted, the City of Uvalde and Texas law enforcement agencies began to aggressively fight requests from media outlets for public records on the police response. The reason why they wanted the details to remain secret soon became clear.
The Texas Tribune recently reported in excruciating detail how the children and teachers at Uvalde actually followed their lockdown protocols by hunkering down and staying quiet—even among their dead and dying friends and teachers—which led officers to incorrectly assume the rooms had already been evacuated. "I'm watching that door. No screams. No nothing. No nothing," one officer later told investigators. "You know. Things you would think you would hear if there had been kids in there."
The Justice Department report notes, "More than one survivor recalled hearing someone state, 'Say 'help' if you need help,' and when a child tried to say 'help,' the subject reentered room 112 from room 111 and shot the victim."
Meanwhile, survivors inside the classrooms were calling 911, texting family members, and wondering why the police hadn't come yet. The police were busy doing things like holding back a fellow officer whose wife had been shot in one of the classrooms.
One mother who snuck past police into the school and retrieved her two children alleged that Uvalde police threatened her with arrest for obstruction of justice if she continued to talk to the media about what happened.
"This community deserved more than misinformation from officials after the attack," Garland said at the press conference today.
It's worth remembering that, before the most basic details of the botched police response began to trickle out, Texas politicians defaulted to their usual deference.
"The reality is, as horrible as what happened, it could have been worse," Republican Texas Gov. Gregg Abbot originally said. "The reason it was not worse is that law enforcement officials did what they do. They showed amazing courage by running toward gunfire for the singular purpose of trying to save lives. And it is a fact that because of their quick response, getting on the scene of being able to respond to the gunman and eliminating the gunman, they were able to save lives."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
" . . . shall not be infringed . . . "
Like Pearl High School. Imagine of the assistant principal hadn't needed to go to the parking lot, but had the pistol holstered.
"The school's assistant principal, Joel Myrick, retrieved a .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol from his truck and, spotting Woodham attempting to flee the parking lot after the shooting, shouted for him to stop. Woodham lost control of his vehicle, and Myrick ordered him out of the car at gunpoint and detained him until police arrived at the scene."
(only 2 killed, 7 wounded; no 'assault rifle, so the ban wouldn't have made a difference)
It ain't that hard.
First on the scene calls for backup and an ambulance or two, then goes in and kills the bastard. If he doesn't kill the bastard, he at least distracts him from killing civilians.
Within a week of Columbine, every county deputy had toured every school in the county and become familiar with the layout and the normally occupied spaces.
Within 10 years of Columbine, almost no county deputy (which would handle only a tiny fraction of the schools in the country - most being inside municipalities) had ever toured a school, let alone did the detailed work that would be needed to be sufficiently familiar with the layout to not need to 'wing it' in an emergency.
Not even city cops did it.
The reality is, police were complacent before Colombine, they were complacent in the immediate aftermath, and they're complacent today - and that's fine. Because shootings are crazy rare considering the size of the school.
12,000 k-12 schools in the US (not counting colleges/universities/technical schools). A shooting a month for 10 years straight is still only 10% of these schools.
That's actually 1%.
And, of course, there aren't nearly that many shootings.
Do you think this is anything like the theory, that if you’re attacked in public, you’re better off if there is only one person around rather than twenty?
Does the report also indicate how many officers were fired or disciplined in the wake of this failure?
All the heroes in blue got home safely that night which is all that really matters. Disgraceful they didn't all receive medals for their unyielding reticence and caution in the face of potential harm.
Did they ever get notice of the shooter's skin color? Wouldn't want them shooting at a member of the dindonuffin tribe now would we?
"The Robb Elementary School shooting was a mass shooting that occurred on May 24, 2022, in Uvalde, Texas, United States, when 18-year-old Salvador Ramos"
Sounds like an alt-right, white supremacist to me.
More leftist violence, certainly.
The shooter and most of the cops were Hispanic. The town is almost 80% Hispanic.
It seems like more than that if you spend any time there.
Must be easy to sit there and Monday Morning Quarterback. I'm not saying that the responders did nothing wrong, they did.
Here's a good one. When a school shooting takes place and the responders storm the school, like what some people here are calling for, are the responders going to be forgiven for any students killed in the assault? I didn't think so.
Copsucker
Really? So not damning the police at any and every opportunity means one is a copsucker?
You need to get out of your parent's basement and see the real world.
You beat me to it!
"Monday Morning Quarterback"
Um, it was a full Justice Department Investigation.
"Here’s a good one. When a school shooting takes place and the responders storm the school, like what some people here are calling for, are the responders going to be forgiven for any students killed in the assault? I didn’t think so"
Actually, that's a lame one. Are you suggesting that the cops simply let the shooting continue since there *might* be friendly-fire casualties?
I’d accept an exchange rate of a couple cops to several kids as evidence that cops made a good faith effort to rescue kids.
Serious, just arm the damn school and get rid of no-gun zones. If the government isn’t going to protect them, then stop disarming them.
Granted, I haven't been in an elementary school in 40+ years, but back in the day each classroom had at least on large "fire escape" window for emergencies. Are these still a thing? Is it still possible for people to bail out and run like hell?
The elementary's I went to didn't. They had those horzontally opening windows, 4ft wide, 2.5 ft tall that opened like 12 inches at the top. I mean, I guess you could push a toddler through the top, but no 1st grader's going through that.
the disastrous police response...was a result of a lack of leadership and failure to follow well-established principles for responding to active shooters.
Fuck principles, what about principles? Does the report make any mention of the comprehensive lack of valor from the whole of Uvalde' finest? Do the recommendations include seppuku?
"...They showed amazing courage by running toward gunfire for the singular purpose of trying to save lives..."
And then pathetic cowardice, stopping outside the room while the shooter was still shooting.
See, this is what happens when you focus on state-action as a primary source.
There failure of 'leadership' was not in the senior ranks of the Uvalde police department. It was in the failure of ordinary people to take and maintain control of their own lives.
'Leadership' told them they couldn't be armed. 'Leadership' told them to submit. 'Leadership' told them the 'leaders' would take care of them.
Stop believing in 'leaders' and most of this goes away.
+10000000....
I think the commenters here are being really tough on those cops. Sure, they could have run in and sorted the situation out and maybe saved a few children's lives but think of it from their point of view.
If you had proper Police Training you would know its not just "innocent lives" (and they were probably guilty of "something") that the cops have to think about.
If they were injured or killed how many thousands of pot smokers would they not be able to arrest? How many cars would they not have been able to have impounded? How many houses would have gone un-forfeited? How many dogs would have gone un-shot?
Big picture stuff that civilians just don't understand
Great defense of incompetence. So if a gunman on a rampage is not a reason for imminent police involvement what is or why gave cops at all?
Read that as satire.
Greg Abbott is a worthless stain.
We need to find a way to attract a better class of people to law enforcement.
Better training. Better education. Better temperament. Better character. Better judgment. Better equipment. Better accountability. Better oversight. Better people.
Fuck off and die, asshole bigot. And please take your family with you for three generations in each direction. The world will thank you for making the world a more intelligent place.
"The police have no obligation to save you."
Well, then what am I paying them for ?
And why would anyone go anywhere unarmed?
Because the police will save you.
Paradox? Yep.
Leftists argue that no teacher should have to wield a gun.
I would respond that any teacher unable to assume the adult responsibility of protecting children has no business being around them, let alone teaching them. Children need GOOD role models. That rules out leftists entirely.
Yeah we all knew a year ago that the cops fucked up. My question is what does the DOJ have to do with it and why should I give a shit what Merrick Garland has to say about anything.