The Cops Are Watching You
New online database details the shocking extent of intrusive surveillance tech used by American police.

Who watches the watchmen? All of us, if we're smart. In the age of surveillance, that means monitoring how and where the snoops put us under scrutiny. Among the people and organizations doing such important work is the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which recently updated one of its countersurveillance tools.
"The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today unveiled its new Street Level Surveillance hub, a standalone website featuring expanded and updated content on various technologies that law enforcement agencies commonly use to invade Americans' privacy," the group announced January 10.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Understanding How We're Being Watched
The hub consolidates information about such evolving and increasingly common technologies as automated license plate readers, biometric surveillance, body-worn cameras, camera networks, cell-site simulators, drones, face recognition, gunshot detection, and social media monitoring. There's also a news section featuring relevant articles about such topics as the huge amount of data modern cars collect about their drivers and the legal status of surveillance efforts in various jurisdictions.
Not all of the technologies and practices covered by the Street Level Surveillance hub are inherently bad; body-worn cameras (BWCs), for instance, have been championed by reformers as a means of recording interactions between police and the public so that there's an objective record of events.
"For nearly two decades, law enforcement agencies have explored and implemented the use of body cameras as a tool to help hold officers accountable and make departments more transparent," PBS News Hour reported in 2020.
But, as EFF points out, "because police often control when BWCs are turned on and how the footage is stored, BWCs often fail to do the one thing they were intended to do: record video of how police interact with the public." The organization says the cameras should be used only with strict safeguards regarding usage, privacy, and storage of recordings.
Other technologies are more obviously intrusive, such as automated license plate readers (ALPRs) which "capture all license plate numbers that come into view, along with the location, date, and time." While the readers have the potential to solve crimes by showing who was at the scene, they do so by following people's movements and can build patterns of life around where people travel and with whom they associate.
"Where you go can reveal many things about you—whether you attend political rallies, which religious institution you attend, if you go to the gun store," the ACLU's Allie Bohn warned the South Bend Tribune in 2014 about the use of automated license plate readers.
That was two years after New York City cops were found to be tracking mosque attendance using ALPRs.
EFF engages in extensive litigation to limit the use of ALPRs and to restrict data-sharing among law-enforcement agencies.
Where Are We Being Watched?
The Street Level Surveillance hub integrates closely with EFF's already established Atlas of Surveillance. Users can search the Atlas for jurisdictions to see what surveillance tools are currently in use in their hometowns or in places they're visiting.
Unsurprisingly, Washington, D.C. is closely monitored by the powers that be. Residents and visitors in the nation's capital are scrutinized by automated license plate readers, face recognition scanning by the FBI of driver's license photos, a registry of private security cameras, gunshot detection microphones (yes, they can overhear conversations), cell-site simulators which pinpoint the locations of phones and their users, and more. The Atlas lists the surveillance tools used in the city and links to more information on them—including the extensive write-ups on the Street Level Surveillance hub.
The Atlas also includes an interactive map of the United States plotting the use of various surveillance technologies, including links to information about local implementations. It's a handy tool if you're planning a trip and want to see just how likely it is that you'll wind up on somebody's radar (or camera, or microphone). In 2022, I used the map to trace a road trip my son and I took to visit a college campus in Kansas.
"According to the Atlas of Surveillance, we passed through jurisdictions that, in addition to bodycams and doorbell cameras, register private surveillance cameras for official use, monitor the public with drones, detect gunshots, use facial recognition, track cellphones, and automatically check passing license plates against databases," I wrote at the time.
That route isn't becoming any more private, but the leg of our journey through northeastern New Mexico and into Kansas remains relatively unmonitored.
For those who truly want to marinate in the Big Brother experience, EFF also offers Spot the Surveillance, a virtual reality tool demonstrating how to identify spying technologies. According to the summary, "the user is placed in a 360-degree scene in the Western Addition neighborhood of San Francisco, where a young resident is in the middle of a police encounter. By looking up, down, and all around, you must identify a variety of surveillance technologies in the environment, including a body-worn camera, automated license plate readers, a drone, a mobile biometric device, and pan-tilt-zoom cameras."
No, thanks. I'm paranoid enough as it is.
We Can All Watch the Watchmen
For anybody concerned about privacy and surveillance, and interested in how the use of such technologies is implemented and regulated, EFF's Street Level Surveillance hub offers a handy resource. Instead of wondering just what biometric surveillance is, you can quickly look it up and be simultaneously informed and creeped out by discovering that it "encompasses a collection of methods for tracking individuals using physical or biological characteristics, ranging from fingerprint and DNA collection to gait recognition and heartbeat tracking."
Biometric surveillance is an evolving field and not yet widely implemented as such, though various technologies under the very broad heading (it includes tattoo recognition) are certainly gaining ground. But it's closely related to face recognition, which is all over the place.
It's all just a little bit spooky. But so long as the snoops are watching us—and they are—it's only fair that we return the favor by keeping an eye on them, too.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“Who watches the watchmen? All of us, if we’re smart. In the age of surveillance, that means monitoring how and where the snoops put us under scrutiny.”
That’s why we need the constitution to be UPDATED to give EVERYONE the inalienable right to record any and all memories we want to everywhere we go.
It is our self defence when we are accused by liars, and our proof of truth when we accuse criminals.
Technology is being used against us. We need a “second amendment” for technology.
I’m making over $7k a month working component time. I saved hearing other people inform me how lots cash they could make online so Qs I decided to look at it. Well, it turned into all proper and has definitely modified my life. Get this today by follow instructions====>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
cxghfdb bcghf
my neighbor’s mother-in-law makes $80/hour on the computer. She has been fired from work for 5 months but last month her paycheck was $25465 just working on the computer for a few hours. I was reading this … http://Www.worktoday7.co
Makes $140 to $180 per day online work and I received $16894 in one month online acting from home just in a few hours. I am a daily student and work simply for a few hours in my spare time. Everybody can get this job. For details…..
open this web…… http://Www.Worktoday7.co
The other day, was talking with a friend on the phone and the topic of government surveillance came up. She said that the authorities are reading every email, following each text, and listening to all of our phone conversations. I told her she was a conspiracy theorist. She laughed. I laughed. And agent Peters also laughed.
How is Agent Peters doing this day? Heard one of his family members was in the hospital.
My friends and I refer to him as “Bob”.
Seems like just the other day, the primary opposition candidate claimed that the authorities had tapped his phone. The media laughed, most of the electorate laughed, and Agent Strzok and FBI Attny Clinesmith also laughed.
And even if they aren’t watching you now, Jack Smith will get a subpeona and find out what you said.
But if you were actually robbed, defrauded or assaulted, they probably won’t bother to use the technology to catch the perpetrator.
Why would cops care about crimes with victims? There’s no money in it. Unless they can accuse the victim of selling drugs or something. Then they can steal the victim’s house and car.
The left wants to watch us to protect democracy. The right wants to watch us to protect democracy. The tech industry wants to watch us to monetize democracy. And the government wants to watch us, well, because that is what modern authoritarian governments do, in the name of democracy.
I am not sure how much more democracy we can stand.
Don’t worry! If you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear-hahahahaha!
A generation or so I was inclined to actually believe that. If surveillance would help catch some terrible terrorist, why should I care if anyone in authority knew what books I checked out from my local library? Hey, I wasn’t doing anything wrong so why worry?
That had to be my dumbest moment. Perhaps I did not at the time realize that I would become an enemy of my government, just for not going along.
The hub consolidates information about such evolving and increasingly common technologies as automated license plate readers
Would these be the very same automated license plate readers that Reason itself cheers on and pushes?
, have been championed by reformers as a means of recording interactions between police and the public so that there’s an objective record of events.
And bodyworn cameras have also been derided by “reformers”. Because competing virtues are a bitch.
The EFF does good work.
Fuck that. The EFF was part of the pro-NN/”Pai repealing Title II will end the internet” and pro-S230/”The 1A of the internet”. The worst possible outcome**.
They couldn’t find their own ass with two hands, let alone any electronic frontier if the party told them where to find it. The only way they get encryption right is because, policy-wise, it’s so inherently personal and individual that nobody has figured out a stupid enough way to falsely portray it as socially correct* in order to sell it to them.
*Encryption is based on math and white people use encryption the most, ergo encryption is racist and a law to regulate encryption would be the CRA of the internet. Only Klansman, Right-wing extremists, and insurrectionists with something to hide would use encryption.
**What the fuck good is encryption of the government can control the wires the traffic flows on and any/all publicly conveyed speech? “Know your role and shut your encrypted hole or we’ll throttle the fuck out of your encrypted disinformation.”
ya try an episode of Real Time Crime on DiscoveryID
The danger is not so much the recordings and databases being collected, but more about how the data is being used by government. For example, since there’s no such thing as perfect data or perfect analysis, if a law enforcement snoop gets the wrong person using faulty data or faulty analysis, the innocent victim will undoubtedly suffer with almost no recourse after being attacked by the government who is supposed to be protecting us. Another example is intentional abuse: officials using tracking to stalk someone they don’t like or want to have an illicit affair with. And please don’t say it can’t happen … I can cite a dozen examples right off the top!
My town doesn’t seem to use any of those technologies.
As usual, Reason just has a simplistic view of the world again, treating “the government” as if it were a monolithic entity. Stupid beyond belief.
Maybe your town doesn’t. Maybe it does and you don’t know it. Your state police certainly use every available technology, as do the feds.
(1) Technology costs money and this shows up in budgets. So, yes, we know whether our town uses these. Furthermore, the use of these technologies becomes obvious in legal cases.
(2) The state police can’t collect license plates in my town if my town doesn’t use license plate readers.
(3) The article doesn’t talk about “the feds” it talks about “the government”. There is no such thing as “the government” in the US; there are thousands of different governments.
1) True. However it doesn’t necessarily have to show up on the budget if it’s a gift from the federal government. I live in Shitville Maine and the police department has an armored vehicle. A gift from Uncle Sam. Not on the budget, but there it is.
2) They put readers on cop cars now. So if a trooper is on the side of the road, there’s a good chance every single plate going past is getting read.
3) Talk about pedantic. When people say “government” most other people know what they’re talking about.
This is an excellent post, Sarc. I was going to reply something similar (but probably less effective than what you posted).
I wish you would engage like this more often instead of the constant trolling and pissing contests.
Agree it is a good post; not that Sarc will care whether anyone agrees with him, or not.
And, of course, your web browser rats you out each time you visit that hub’s site.
WHO is the very factor. In practically every case the common man who would publicly publish pictures of his neighbors every movement could be charged with harassment, defamation or invasion of privacy. Funny how all those rules change when the WHO’S watching changes.
You realize that privacy is a thing of the past now, right? I mean, we talk about it like it’s this thing that still exists and is valuable – but it’s long gone. Has been for awhile.
Also, anyone making arguments against the State’s surveillance network who – even once – argued in support of scamdemic masking and social distancing? They’re hypocrites. And if they don’t know that, then they’re useful idiots. That nonsense was used for no reason whatsoever other than to help fine tune those surveillance databases.
“Also, anyone making arguments against the State’s surveillance network who – even once – argued in support of scamdemic masking and social distancing? They’re hypocrites.”
Well, actually, I like the fact that wearing a mask is common and accepted. All the better to defeat video surveillence and facial recognition. If all the Jan. 6th protestors were wearing their masks, most of them would be free right now because the feds wouldn’t have been able to identify as many of them.
Well they are already using your “Ring” doorcam footage without your permission / consent. Your smartTV is a spy. Alexa and her knockoff clones aren’t even pretending anymore.
Stop putting internet accessible devices in your house / livingspace.
Let’s not forget the clandestine FUSION CENTERS. With one phone call your local police department has access to federal intelligence databases. Remember last summer’s congressional testimony about ‘Commercially available Data’ which the government PURCHASES en masse from undisclosed companies; I wonder where that data ends up hmmm.? 9/11 introduced the breakdown of historical intelligence silos and mission creep has crept in. Friendly Reminder, an Emergency Declaration is still in place from 9/11.
Additionally, keep in mind, that with advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning, these intelligence data sets can be processed, cross referenced and analyzed at a lightning pace to provide a detailed picture/mosaic of an individual’s life in easily to understand intelligence report.