State Governments Promised Private Companies More than $10 Billion in Subsidies Last Year
The statistic, compiled by watchdog group Good Jobs First, only takes into account "megadeals" involving at least $50 million in subsidies.

Governments often make deals with private companies, offering generous subsidies to encourage development in their respective states. The year 2023 was unfortunately no exception.
According to a new report from Good Jobs First, a watchdog group that tracks economic development deals, 16 states promised more than $10 billion to private companies last year. The group counted 23 "megadeals," which it defines as any agreement involving at least $50 million in subsidies to a private company.
The most spendthrift state was Michigan, which agreed to shell out $2.73 billion for three projects, including $1.7 billion to Ford Motor Company, the single largest economic development deal in the nation last year. The Center for Economic Accountability, a Michigan-based think tank that opposes corporate welfare, previously named the Ford subsidy 2023's Worst Economic Development Deal of the Year.
Economic development subsidies are often sold with the promise that the state will recoup its initial investment in the form of greater tax revenues, as the development projects spur economic growth. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer pledged that the Ford project "has an employment multiplier of 4.38, which means that an additional 4.38 jobs in Michigan's economy are anticipated to be created for every new direct job." A multiplier of 4.38 would be extraordinarily high, and a much more realistic number would be closer to 1.5 or 2.
When broken down by the number of jobs the subsidies are supposed to directly create, the math is still unfavorable. Michigan's $1.7 billion investment, intended to "create 2,500 good-paying jobs," works out to a staggering $680,000 per job, for which state taxpayers would be on the hook. (Ford has since announced it would be "re-timing and resizing some investments," which included paring back its project in Michigan and lowering its job creation goal to 1,700).
Good Jobs First noted in its report that 18 of the deals announced last year included "job creation targets," for a total of 34,928 jobs promised. When compared against the amount of state funding promised in return, though, that works out to an average subsidy of $262,800 per job.
Among the other most egregious examples on the list, Amazon received property tax exemptions worth $1 billion over 15 years for its Oregon data centers. At the time, Good Jobs First noted that Amazon—which recorded $4.3 billion in profits and $524.9 billion in revenue last year—"hasn't said how many jobs it will create, but the program under [which] the tax breaks were approved requires just 10 jobs per project."
If there is an upside, the report notes that 2023 actually saw fewer "megadeals" than the year before. "Whereas we dubbed 2022 a 'mega-year' for megadeals," writes Good Jobs First research analyst Nya Anthony, "the decreasing costs and number of deals in 2023 suggest a cooling-off period for state and local subsidy decision-makers this year." Unfortunately, Anthony still foresees that the automotive and tech industries "will most likely be heavily subsidized next year."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Without reading the article, what do they consider a "subsidy"?
Among the other most egregious examples on the list, Amazon received property tax exemptions worth $1 billion over 15 years for its Oregon data centers. At the time, Good Jobs First noted that Amazon—which recorded $4.3 billion in profits and $524.9 billion in revenue last year—"hasn't said how many jobs it will create, but the program under [which] the tax breaks were approved requires just 10 jobs per project."
They do reference the Ford plant in Michigan, which actually includes some direct payouts by the government for things like site development and grants. And it's in service of an E.V. battery plant, which is a side of the industry that Ford is increasingly disinterested in pushing.
But yeah, I definitely don't consider tax breaks and tax credits the same thing as direct subsidies.
I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned Qa effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to..
Check It—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
They don't say. But I know at least recently (the article about movie / TV production in Georgia) it included tax waivers, which is not something I would normally consider a subsidy.
Why wouldn't you consider a tax waiver to be a subsidy? Everyone else has to pay it but Bob (and only Bob) doesn't. If that's not a subsidy, what do you prefer to call it?
In many cases nobody else even can pay it. Tax waivers often waive a tax that wouldn't exist were it not for the waiver. That is, the business wouldn't even be done were it not for the waiver; it's not as if Bob were one among many similar business enterprises.
If it's something that can't be done without bending the rules, then should it be done?
I get what you're saying, but it is still a thumb on the scale. And it is very much a temptation to increasingly plan the economy, and then to pick and choose winners, so it should be discouraged everywhere, all the time. Too much corrupting power in the hands of corruptible people.
Seriously, If an industry isn't profitable using the rules that EVERYONE has to follow, well, so be it. Those investment dollars should go toward something that is more in demand.
If you don't want to buy our product well F'You!
We'll use gov-'guns' and MAKE you buy it...
Welcome to the Commie-State.
Transgender Candidate Disqualified For Not Revealing Birth Name
A transgender activist who was running as a Democrat for the Ohio House has been disqualified for omitting the candidate's original name.
Vanessa Joy legally changed names in 2022.
According to Ohio law, political candidates must disclose their former name if they have changed their name in the previous five years.
"I would have had to have my dead name on my petitions," Joy said. "But in the trans community, our dead names are dead; there's a reason it's dead — that is a dead person who is gone and buried."
that is a dead person who is gone and buried.
But probably still voting for a Democrat in Chicago.
Funny how I knew it was a man who 'transitioned' to a woman.
I honestly don't know who all the women who transitioned to men are, standing next to me quietly at the urinal, but at least they keep their fucking yaps shut about it.
It isn't in the "trans community". It is in the real world.
Way up north in the land of autos
Where govt handouts are their motto
Look away, look away, look away, look away
Old Detoit..
Small potatoes Joe compared to the trillion in new deficit spending in the last few months. a trillion of newly printed digital dollars handed over to perhaps the most corrupt organization in the history of the world..the US Federal Govt. I honestly dont' care if the idiots in Michigan make themselves poorer by handing over money to Ford. (disclaimer..the one Ford I bought was a lemon and I had the dealer buy me out after two years because Ford refused to do anything).
End the Fed..that should be Reason's only reason these days. But man if they did the entire Reason gang would lose all their friends and neighbors in DC..