Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Campus Free Speech

Harvard's Affirmative Action Hire Gets the Boot

Plus: Trump sues over ballot access, the CCP tells people to have sex, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 1.3.2024 9:32 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Claudine Gay | Rick Friedman/Polaris/Newscom
(Rick Friedman/Polaris/Newscom)

Gay is out: Harvard President Claudine Gay was ousted resigned yesterday, setting a record for the shortest tenure in the formerly esteemed university's nearly 400-year history.

In December, Gay—along with Sally Kornbluth of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Liz Magill of the University of Pennsylvania—was grilled by members of Congress on how elite universities handled campus fallout from Hamas' October 7 pogrom of Israeli civilians. At Harvard specifically, over 30 student groups circulated and signed a declaration stating that they "hold the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence," calling it "the apartheid regime." (All protected speech, sure, but all stunning given the college campus proclivity for safe spaces, trigger warnings, and shoutdowns of far more anodyne speech.) Since then, Magill has been ousted, but Harvard's governing body said they unanimously stood behind Gay after "extensive deliberations" following her testimony.

But over the past few weeks, evidence has emerged that Gay plagiarized throughout her academic career. Though many in the media downplayed it—saying Gay merely used "inadequate citations," part of their pattern of being overly laudatory toward her—half of the journal articles her resume lists include plagiarized sections, as well as her dissertation. The kicker, per The New York Times: "In one example that drew ridicule, Dr. Gay appeared to borrow exact phrases from the acknowledgments section of another author's book to thank her mentor and family in the acknowledgments section of her own dissertation." You truly cannot make this up.

The Harvard president plagiarism discourse is so weird because, like, this is obviously plagiarism but the whole scandal is so politically coded that the dude who was plagiarized is like "no biggie" https://t.co/rruYciFDcv pic.twitter.com/wgxT5PeJBa

— Ben Dreyfuss (@bendreyfuss) January 2, 2024

The donors who initially pushed Harvard to better tackle the antisemitism problem, like hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, seem to have realized that the university's problem is not just one single administrator or young people embracing Hamas-apologist ideas. "I came to learn that the root cause of antisemitism at Harvard was an ideology that had been promulgated on campus, an oppressor/oppressed framework, that provided the intellectual bulwark behind the protests, helping to generate anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hate speech and harassment," wrote Ackman. But also: "The cost structure of the University is out of control due in large part to the fact that the administration has grown without bounds," he adds, and "the price of the product, a Harvard education, has risen at a rate well in excess of inflation for decades."

"What other successful business do you know that has grown the number of customers it serves by less than 20% in 35 years, and where nearly all revenue growth has come from raising prices?" asks Ackman, diagnosing a far bigger problem.

Some may counter that there are some 1,576 public and 2,160 private colleges and universities in the U.S., so why does this one get so much press attention? Many college students' brains went to woke mush a long time ago, so who cares that student groups LARPed as foreign policy experts for all of 15 minutes?

I think dismissing it all as inconsequential is wrong. For better or worse, Harvard graduates steeped in DEI ideology have gone on to infect all kinds of other industries with their foolish ideas. And, if the 30-year-olds haven't risen in the ranks enough at present, they surely will in the future: In 2021, 41 of the companies on the Fortune 500 list were helmed by Harvard alums (Amazon CEO Andy Jassy and JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, for example). If the fever breaks at Harvard, as Ackman and others seem to desire, that will have ripple effects.

My only question is why it took a decade for powerhouse donors like Ackman to realize what was going on. If someone had been minding the store, Gay would never have been hired in the first place.

2024's bad laws: With a new year comes legislators attempting, once again, to screw up your life. Here's a sampling of what fresh hell awaits.

  • California will start mandating that large retailers set aside some toy aisles as gender-neutral.
  • Nearly half of U.S. states—22, to be exact—saw minimum wage increases take effect on January 1. The increases affect 11.4 percent of workers nationwide, or 8.4 million people, but the cost increases will surely be passed on to consumers (so we will all be affected by this, actually).
  • In Michigan, red flag laws and more regulations on gun storage and background checks will go into effect, making it even harder for residents to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
  • In New York, private schools are now required to offer menstrual products, free of charge, in bathrooms. (I wonder if they'll be offered in men's bathrooms too, as YOU NEVER KNOW who may be menstruating, or so they tell me).

Scenes from New York:  

"I have since discovered that many of the places in New York where my ancestors lived are still standing: tenements on the Lower East Side, brownstones in Brooklyn Heights, a squat apartment building in Astoria, a two-family building in Canarsie," writes Binyamin Appelbaum in a beautiful piece for The New York Times.

"I take pleasure in wandering around this museum of family history, but it also makes me sad. The buildings survive because New York is preserving the corporeal city of bricks and steel at the expense of its residents and of those who might live here."


QUICK HITS

  • The Chinese Communist Party does an about-face on the how-many-kids question, now trying to pressure women into having more babies due to worries about less-than-expected population growth. Women are receiving calls from government officials attempting to exert pressure on matters of family planning, per a Wall Street Journal report.
  • A top Hamas official, Saleh al-Arouri, was just killed in a drone strike in Beirut for which Israel has not yet claimed responsibility.
  • Donald Trump just filed a lawsuit in an attempt to get his name re-added to the Maine ballot. "The lawsuit filed Tuesday challenges a decision last week by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, who held that the former president is ineligible for another term because of a section of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment," reports Bloomberg. The 14th Amendment strategy—which bars those who have "engaged in insurrection" from holding federal office—has been used in several states and will likely be weighed by the Supreme Court.
  • More previously redacted names of Jeffrey Epstein's buddies will be released soon.
  • Fifth Circuit news:

NEW: 5th Circuit sides with Texas, says Biden admin overstepped in telling hospitals they were obligated to perform life-saving abortions under the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.

Background: https://t.co/Z56ZvMzn8s

Ruling: https://t.co/nB6twxD5QX

— Eleanor Klibanoff (@eklib) January 2, 2024

  • Historical tidbits:

Child labor in the US was declining *before* it was banned by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 pic.twitter.com/eBmUxlejW1

— Chris Freiman (@cafreiman) January 2, 2024

  • "I consider NFTs a good Rorschach test for whether an individual's mind is capable of moving out of 'the dismissive mode,'" writes Tyler Cowen at Marginal Revolution. 
  • New conservative weapon just dropped:

Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism https://t.co/GiVkT3LgUo

— The Associated Press (@AP) January 3, 2024

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Have a Drink on Me

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Campus Free SpeechReason RoundupHarvardAntisemitismIsraelPalestine
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (500)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   1 year ago

    Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Iran, and Ethiopia officially joined BRICS on January 1, 2024.

    Unipolar hardest hit.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      And I thought Scott Rolen getting into the Baseball Hall of Fame was a stretch...

      1. NovaleeWarwick   1 year ago (edited)

        I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to..
        Check It—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com

      2. Rob Misek   1 year ago

        It’s almost worth the loss of free speech to watch these woke cancellers destroy each other.

        Black women taking on the Israel lobby. Its a win win. hahaha.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Buzz off, Himmler.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Fuck off, Misek.

    2. (Impeach Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   1 year ago

      What a giant slap in the face "fuck you" from our friends, the Saudis. Especially considering that as we speak we're directly helping to kill their Houthi enemies. And it's all because Sleepy Joe and his puppet master Obama have absolutely no clue about how do real basic diplomacy.

      We're always hated by our enemies, but under real president's we at least get grudging respect from our friends. Under these assholes currently running things, not only are we no longer feared by our enemies, but we don't even get the minimal level of respect from our friends.

      1. Moonrocks   1 year ago

        I mean, can you blame them considering how badly the regime bungled the Red Sea mess? This is a prime "shit or get off the pot" situation; either we accept responsibility and defang the Houthis or we wring our hands of the situation and let the locals deal with it (preferably without pressuring them to stop because the Houthis are just such nice guys). The regime seems incapable of committing to either of these.

        1. goyopik1   1 year ago (edited)

          Stay At Home mummy From the large apple Shared Her Secret On but She Was ready to clear 5000 US dollars Weekly From on-line Work merely 3 Weeks once Losing Her recent Job… https://jobstime0909.blogspot.com

      2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        *Psssst!*. The Saudis aren't our friends, never were our friends (Nora bene 9-11-2001,) and as long as their official religion is Islam and as long as their flag contains a sword and the Shahadah ("There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is His Prophet!"), Saudi Arabia will never be our friend.

        Facts. Truth hurts.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Maybe so, but they're still better than any officially atheist state there's ever been.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            Whose supporters you will have to find on a Tankie YouTube site, not here.

            Insisting on a Limited Secular Government is not equal to supporting Communist Albania.

            Now what about all this about Whataboutism?
            🙂
            😉

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Insisting on a Limited Secular Government

              Point out the officially atheist country that ever did this.

              1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

                So you're saying a government that takes no stand on God is anti-God? Sounds like you're supporting a Theocratic flavor of Totalitarianism.

        2. XM   1 year ago

          The Saudis aren't our friends, but they're a frenemy. They're like border states that supported slavery in the civil war but didn't secede - Lincoln had to tolerate them for the sake of the country.

          We need oil from that region and intel on terrorist activity. The best thing for us to do is have diplomatic ties but otherwise not get involved when things go FUBAR there.

      3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        The Saudis don't really have any incentive to cleave to the US after Biden and his glowie allies acted like spastics about its CIA asset Kashoggi getting clapped. Everyone who knows anything about how the Deep State operates could see Kashoggi was being used to foment civil unrest and color revolution against the ruling family, and it's entirely logical that they'd seize the opportunity to take him out when he stupidly walked into that Embassy in Turkey.

        Also, non-alignment has been a goal of the Third World since Bandung in 1955. You work to make sure no one power has exclusive control over you, and can thus leverage that alliance for its own benefit. This didn't really work in the Cold War, or in reality in general, because there were effectively two sides, the US and USSR, and you eventually have to pick one or the other if you want to maintain steady trade and diplomacy.

        Now, it's effectively the EU and US vs Russia and China, and these countries are picking the horse that they think will benefit them the most. It's notable that Millei is trying to keep Argentina out of BRICS for now, but that will likely change after his time in office ends, whenever that may be.

        The hilarious part is that this isn't even really due to Trump, it's due to a generation of neocon/neolib heavy-handedness, entitlement, maliciousness, and stupidity by Bush, Obama, Biden, and their various circles ever since 9/11.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      All of them are BRICS shit-houses if they aren't politically, socially, and economically free. And their proposed monetary alternative is as much fart vapor as Federal Reserve ass-paper.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Whether it's vapor or not is immaterial to whether they can convince most of the Third World to go along with them. The US is hardly entitled to perpetual status as the world's reserve currency, and their reputation is effectively in the toilet now.

        Visa already squealed to the federal government when they lost a ton of market share to in India to RuPay, while all the sanctions on Russia after the invasion have failed to hurt their economy enough to either force them to withdraw or foment an overthrow of Putin. Turns out you don't need to worry about Atlanticist sanctions, when the nation that the US sold out its manufacturing base and military tech to--in the stupid belief that bloo-bloo-bloo jeeeenz n' rok un rolololololol would democratize the country--is acting as a major trade partner.

        Meanwhile, the post-WW2 globalist order, which has largely been dominated by the US, is coming closer and closer every day to cracking up completely.

    4. DRM   1 year ago

      Ah, yes, an organization whose entire genesis was being mentioned in an investment advisor's acronym back in 2001 has now expanded to even greater heights of geostrategic incoherence and internal self-contradiction. There hasn't been a similar threat to American global dominance since the founding of the Non-Aligned Movement.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        If the dollar isn’t the reserve currency and petrodollar isn’t used by the rest of the world, the inflation we’re experiencing now will be nothing compared to what’s coming. Our dollar is built on a house of cards.

        1. Chumby   1 year ago

          Keep improving your preps.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        As I pointed out above, the Non-Aligned Movement was always more of a pretense than a reality. Paul Johnson goes into some detail about this in "Modern Times," in his discussion about how Nasser tried to play both sides of the US and USSR against each other, and ended up aligning mostly with the Soviets in short order when the US wouldn't help him destroy Israel.

  2. Ajsloss   1 year ago

    Gay is out? Homophobe much?

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Can't say Gay at Harvard.

      1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

        Don't say Gay!

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Its not like she plagiarized Snow White.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

      It's funny that the ap concider not stealing a conservative weapon

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        No, more like the AP (and all woke liberals) consider stealing, including both academic text and stuff at Walgreens, a human right. Therefore, conservatives and others who oppose stealing are colonizing oppressors.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago (edited)

      If Claudine Gay is grown-up, then this Pansexual would rather have the Harvard President be Peter Pan.
      🙂
      😉

    4. Chumby   1 year ago

      Bitter dingers hardest hit.

  3. JesseAz   1 year ago

    New timeline based documentary if unreleased video including bodycam footage of J6 released to X.

    https://twitter.com/J6TrueTimeline/status/1741866543858729452

    A bit of everything here. Shoes the cops using riot gear on protestors prior to rioting. Shows cops letting in people on the west entrance prior to the rioting at the east. Shows officers firing tear gas into crowds but then realizing they forgot their gas masks when rounds thrown back at them, causing them to leave the terraces and go into the halllways. Shows cops working with protestors and protestors asking others to not be violent. Shows cops beating a woman at the east entrance tunnel.

    At 44 min it shows the shooting of Babbitt and the 3 cops less than 5 feet from her on her side of the door. The coward Capitol officer shooting her near point blank from the other side of the door. The shooting occurred before the surge of people even entered the Capitol from the riot on the east side.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      And we know jeff and sarc will refuse to watch it. They prefer the J6 Committe narratives pushed by NYT, WaPo, and CNN.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        “She was asking for it”.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          I mean she was trespassing. Thats a capital offense.

          1. Chumby   1 year ago

            Capitol offense.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Capitol fences were knocked over which is terrorism.

              1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

                Yet the guy who is on video taking them down is never looked for

              2. Chumby   1 year ago

                My take was that the removed confederate statues should have been used as a barricade.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  I mean it is in Stonewall Jacksons name.

            2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

              Capital punning of the Capitol Putsch, Old Bean!
              🙂
              😉

      2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        Your turning her into a canonized saint for the Church of Trump, a religious martyr who was cut down protesting The Great Steal, has made any rational conversation on the subject impossible. Now let us pray. "Hail Ashli, full of grace. May Trump's light shine down upon thee."

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          “It’s cool to make fun of dead people.”

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Those officers are heros. They even got medals. Sarc wins the argument.

          2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            I must say that your stupidity always surprises me.

            No, I'm not making fun of dead people. I'm pointing out how the faithful parishioners of the Church of Trump have elevated the religious martyr Babbitt to sainthood. That's a statement about Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS), not dead people.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Brian Sicknick, hypocrite.

            2. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

              Careful ... your double standard is showing. Oh, wait ... pointing out that the social democrats are EXPERTS at canonizing the saints of THEIR movement is probably "whataboutism" ... never mind ...

            3. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

              On a more serious note, it's possible for people who are NOT "parishioners of the Church of Trump" to question the democratic socialists' narrative about January 6th, although I suspect that the subtlety would be beyond your capabilities if you tried consider it, which I'm certain you won't ...

            4. Zeb   1 year ago

              She was murdered by a cop. At least spare a little outrage for that.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Sarcasmic, you guys took a police officer who died of an unrelated stroke two days later and turned him into an actual martyr. The establishments very own Horst Wessel.

          You laid him in state in the capitol rotunda, a place reserved for presidents, and gave him a state funeral attended by the nations luminaries, and buried him in Arlington.

          All to prop up your party's lie that he died in combat against evil insurrectionists.

          You don't get to throw rocks at people furious that they killed a woman protesting an obviously fraudulent, stolen election.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            I did nothing of the sort. That's just the lies that you and others say about me. Don't stop repeating them though. If you stopped spreading lies and started telling the truth I'd be worried that you had a stroke or something.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Sarcasmic, as long as you continue to attribute Conservative Inc. to the posters here, I'll continue to attribute your party's actions and hypocrisy to you.

              ...nevertheless, when White Mike was screaming about Sicknick's martyrdom here, you were going along with him every single time. You are a liar and a troll.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Sarcasmic, as long as you continue to attribute Conservative Inc. to the posters here, I’ll continue to attribute your party’s actions and hypocrisy to you.

                Dude, I'm not the one who invokes her name on a daily basis and can't help but to bring her up whenever there is a police shooting. Those are the people who have canonized the martyr. I'm just pointing it out.

                And you might actually have a point if I had a fucking party. You can't help but to see my scorn for Republicans because you're always alert to defend them, but willfully ignore by disdain for Democrats because it goes against the narrative. Wake up. You're smarter than JesseAz or Dlam (damning with faint praise I know).

          2. JesseAz   1 year ago

            You can tell he didnt watch the video.

            3 officers within 5 feet of her, no concern, watching her, talking to the people in the hallway.

            Officer Byrd creeps out from a corner and shoots her nearly point blank. Even the officers on the side of Ashlii looked like they were shocked and rushed to her aid.

            Sarc will never watch the video. He prefers to deride the dead unarmed woman.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              Oh I saw the video. And as I said I would probably care if religious zealots like yourself hadn't turned her into the Republican version of George Floyd. You're not doing her or her memory any favors by being such a toxic piece of human garbage that people would rather side with a police officer than agree with you.

              1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                Fuck off you lying garbage human. Being incensed over a murder isn't "a Republican version of George Floyd".

                Floyd died of an overdose, Babbit was murdered for protesting a coup.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  Floyd died of an overdose, Babbit was murdered for protesting a coup.

                  Talk about a scripted narrative. Did you get that off the back of a box of Hannity brand breakfast cereal?

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                    Why, did you find your script off the back of a box of whine?

                2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago (edited)

                  Floyd died of an overdose, Babbit was murdered for protesting a coup.

                  See, this is the problem I have. She didn’t deserve to be shot, but she was going well beyond “protesting.” She wasn’t standing outside waving a flag and chanting “stop the steal,” she was breaking windows and crawling through a clearly barricaded doorway, after a crowd breached multiple police lines to get inside the building. She’s not innocent, and I find it disingenuous to downplay her own actions and choices that day.

                  1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

                    That is clearly well within the modern bounds of "peaceful protest" as the riots of BLM informed us.

                  2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    Watch the video. The shooting occurred before the crowd breached the east entrance. The west entrance had people let in earlier. Mostly meandering peacefully.

                    Likewise 3 cops in the SAME hallways as her. Unconcerned.

                    You dont get to shoot a protestor for breaking a window. Or else many BLM rioters would be dead right now. Or Palestinian protestors who assaulted cops 2 months ago in the Capitol.

                    1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                      I watched the video. Officers on the west side were trying to block protestors, but because the crowd on the west side showed up after the east side, there were many more officers deployed on the east side compared to the west side. As a result, the west side lacked sufficient bodies to hold back the crowd. They absolutely shoved past officers and barricades in order to get inside the building.

                      And I've seen enough video of her pushing and shouting at those three "unconcerned" officers to know that they weren't just letting her go past them. She smashed a window and tried to crawl through a barricade. She is NOT innocent, she's not just a protestor, she's a rioter. Did she deserve to be shot? No. But you can't pretend she's some American hero either.

                    2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                      Moreover, she's part of the crowd that is blatantly shattering windows. That's not okay simply because the officers are watching it happen. (Why are they watching it happen? Probably because they're greatly outnumbered and don't want to shoot people dead) She was clearly not allowed to go through those doors which were locked and barricaded. She wasn't some confused tourist who walked into the wrong room.

                      Anyone who wants to pretend she's completely innocent is just harming their own arguments.

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      When I say that they call me a leftist.

                    4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      Sarc, did it ever occur to you that it's not necessarily what you say, but how you say it?

                      Your semi-snarky attempt below (re: Lorena Bobbitt) is an example of why you get hammered by many in the commentariat. ATM, above, is actually discussing the events and discussing the video. He hasn't once called Jesse a "religious zealot" (or any other insults for that matter), nor is ATM celebrating her death as you have in the past.

                    5. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      ATM, disagreed with the shoving. Not in the documentary, but if you watch Brandon Straka livestream for that day there were maybe a dozen people before the cops started letting them in. Then when the East gets bigger, one of the doors is left unlocked as cops go assist the east leaving the door open and they stream in.

                      The two sides were completely different on how people got in.

                  3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    No, she was murdered. The officer woke up that morning planning to kill Lorena Bobbitt. When she didn't show up he settled for Ashli Babbitt.

              2. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

                So what you are saying is you opinion of the matter is based on what your oppents think?

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I'm saying that some people are so despicable that I'd rather disagree with them then have something in common with them.

                  1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                    Back on the booze again.

                    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      Someone must've pissed in his cereal (or is that beer bottle?) this morning.

                  2. DesigNate   1 year ago

                    That’s a choice I guess.

                  3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                    So basically, if you have the same favorite color as them, you'll change yours just to spite them.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      His favorite color is clear or see through light brown. All his drinks are those colors.

                  4. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    Facts be damned.

                  5. R Mac   1 year ago

                    Haha, that means you’re broken.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

                      Sarc doesnt understand what words mean. He thinks this is the definition of principles.

                2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Lol. That has always been his MO. His allies are jeff and shrike and he goes out of his way to help push their narratives and defend them.

              3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                " And as I said I would probably care if religious zealots like yourself hadn’t turned her into the Republican version of George Floyd."

                So, your personal moral judgements are based on how you craft your opposition to your ideological foes? That sucks balls.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Those are his principles.

                  And what he said there isn't true. He started mocking her on January 6th.

                2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  Now credit Biden for continuing the trade policies that Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS) defended by saying anyone who opposed them was a leftist.

                  You mean you can't credit Biden for anything, even things you defended under a different president, because he's your ideological foe?

                  That sucks balls.

                  1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                    Imagining what other people might do is the same as what you did do?

                    But kudos for using the new Harvard method plagiarism.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      No credit for Biden I see. And I never will. Because it's different when you craft your judgements based entirely upon the opposite of whatever Democrats support.

                  2. DesigNate   1 year ago

                    Can’t really say anything bad about the tariffs.

                    Fuck you for comparing an unarmed protestor to someone who OD’d on a massive amount of drugs, especially seeing as one’s death lead to billions of dollars in property damage, multiple deaths and attempted secession (I’m sorry, autonomous zones) across the nation and the other led to people decrying it online with no subsequent violence.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      He didn't overdose. That's a lie that was spread to defend the police, further demonize the rioters, and absolve the J6 yahoos.

                    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      I'm on the road so I don't have time to correct sarcasmic, but can someone give him a link to his blood pathology report and the coroners report, so he can get a little of the CNN reporting out of his system?

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Every fact checker is a leftist liar. Every single one. The courts too. Some conspiracy theories have turned out to be true, and that means they're all true. If the media says something and the conspiracy theorists says otherwise, always go with the guys on far right fringe. Because they are sometimes proven true. And when they're not, they're still true.

                    4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      ML, here it is. It's kind of hard to tell from the original autopsy report exactly what killed Floyd.

                      https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/george-floyd-death/authorities-just-released-george-floyds-complete-autopsy-report-read-it-here/

                      The medical examiner’s report lists Floyd’s death as having occurred May 25 at 9:25 p.m.; the autopsy was conducted exactly twelve hours later at 9:25 a.m. on May 26.

                      As was released earlier by the medical examiner’s office, Floyd’s cause of death is listed officially as “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.”

                      The report explains, in detail, injuries to Floyd’s body. “Blunt force injuries” included “cutaneous blunt force injuries of the forehead, face, and upper lip” (those are injuries affecting the skin); “mucosal injuries of the lips” (that’s generally the skin inside the lips); “cutaneous blunt force injuries of the shoulders, hands, elbows, and legs,” and “patterned contusions (in some areas abraded) of the wrists, consistent with restraints (handcuffs).”

                      The report says Floyd’s autopsy revealed three “natural diseases:” (1) “arteriosclerotic heart disease,” which it described as “multifocal, severe;” (2) “hypertensive heart disease,” which included a “clinical history of hypertension,” and (3) a left pelvic tumor, which it described as “incidental.” (Incidental tumors are generally benign.)

                      The report elsewhere said that a “cross sections of coronary arteries, though not all ideally oriented, confirm the gross impression of atherosclerotic narrowing.”

                      Blood samples collected at 9:00 p.m. on May 25th, before Floyd died, tested positive for the following, the autopsy report states. (Quantities are given for those who are medically inclined.)

                      * Fentanyl 11 ng/mL
                      * Norfentanyl 5.6 ng/mL
                      * 4-ANPP 0.65 ng/mL
                      * Methamphetamine 19 ng/mL
                      * Various types of THC: 11-Hydroxy Delta-9 THC 1.2 ng/mL; Delta-9 Carboxy THC 42 ng/mL; Delta-9 THC 2.9 ng/mL
                      * Cotinine positive
                      * Caffeine positive

                      A urine drug screen tested positive for presumptive positive for cannabinoids, amphetamines, and fentanyl/metabolite.

                      A urine drug screen also confirmed free morphine of 86 ng/mL.

                      He did seem to have a fair quantity of drugs in his system.

                    5. DesigNate   1 year ago

                      He definitely OD'd. He started complaining about not being able to breath while sitting in the back of the patrol car. Whether Chauvin exacerbated it or not is hard to tell from the video evidence.

                      But let's say, for arguments sake, that you're right and they were both murdered by overzealous cops. One of those resulted in all the things I mentioned in my previous post and the other one did not.

                      So again, forget you for comparing the two and insisting that anyone who might have a problem with one is a religious zealot or some deranged sycophant.

                    6. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

                      Didn't it recently come out, through discovery phase of during a lawsuit involving members of the prosecutor's office, that the D.A. called the medical examiner before the autopsy report was released, and pressured him to change the report to say the restraint caused Floyd's death and not the drugs?

                  3. R Mac   1 year ago

                    “Trump’s Deranged Supporters (TDS)”

                    And YOU coined it!

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Lol.

                    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      If you weren't so deranged I wouldn't have to.

                    3. Chumby   1 year ago

                      That will be on his epitaph:

                      “I coined the phrase Trump’s Deranged Supporters” followed by “I didn’t write that”

              4. R Mac   1 year ago

                It’s ok the police murdered her because I don’t like you.

                — sarc

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I refuse to canonize this religious martyr because I'm not a parishioner of the Church of Trump.

                  -- sarc

                  1. R Mac   1 year ago

                    I missed her canonization. Care to cite an example? Because Floyd has statues and murals.

                  2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    "I refuse to canonize this religious martyr"

                    Oh. Was Babbit laid in state in the capitol rotunda and buried at Arlington too?

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      In the minds of Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS) she may as well have been. TDS is a powerful thing.

                    2. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Except you’re just making up bullshit now. So broken.

              5. JesseAz   1 year ago

                Amazing you watched it under 15 minutes when it is an hour long by the way. Almost like you're lying.

          3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            Then you have the fentanyl-addled George Floyd being canonized, immortalized on murals, and used as a get-out-of-jail free card for riots causing billions of dollars of damage, burned down cities, and a significant death toll.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              It's funny, there are so many conflicting narratives about how he really died that I can't keep track. Some say fentanyl, others meth. What they can agree on is that depraved-heart murder by a callous cop didn't happen. If it did then they might be forced to sympathize with the rioters. But rather than do that they believe a lie.

              1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                As if believing police are murderous assholes, which I do believe, suddenly makes someone believe it’s okay to burn down an unrelated Target, then loot gas stations and liquor stores.

              2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                Floyd did have fentanyl and meth in his system, and the pathological autopsy report (linked above) mentioned he also had severe heart disease. It's quite possible that his death was a combination of factors (drugs, heart disease, stress from the arrest) that, alone, would not have killed him on that particular day.

              3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                Fentanyl 11 ng/mL
                Norfentanyl 5.6 ng/mL
                4-ANPP 0.65 ng/mL
                Methamphetamine 19 ng/mL
                Various types of THC: 11-Hydroxy Delta-9 THC 1.2 ng/mL; Delta-9 Carboxy THC 42 ng/mL; Delta-9 THC 2.9 ng/mL
                Cotinine positive
                Caffeine positive

              4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                I simply pointed out that he was a far worse person to have been murdered by cops than Babbit appears to have been, and the idol-worship perpetrated in Floyd's name was orders of magnitude more overplayed than any such purported "elevated the religious martyr Babbitt to sainthood. That’s a statement about Trump’s Deranged Supporters (TDS), not dead people."

              5. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                Floyd’s cause of death is listed officially as “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.” The full autopsy report states further that “no life-threatening injuries [were] identified.” The medical examiner’s office had also previously deemed the manner of Floyd’s death a “homicide.”

                The report describes Floyd as a “46-year-old man who became unresponsive while being restrained by law enforcement officers; he received emergency medical care in the field and subsequently in the Hennepin HealthCare (HHC) Emergency Department, but could not be resuscitated.”

      3. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        Oh, they're gonna watch that scene all right. Repeatedly, with a bottle of lube handy.

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      Two lying piles of lefty shit on the subject:

      Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2
      April.20.2021 at 10:47 pm
      “Ashli Babbitt attacked the USA much like the 9/11 hijackers did.”

      JasonT20
      February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
      “How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”

      1. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

        It was bad enough the first time it was posted. Re-posting it does nothing to prove how wrong they are, it just inflates their egos that you went to the trouble to find the nonsense and makes them feel more important than they are here. Trolls are gonna troll ... it's what they do. Don't feed the trolls!

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

          "Don’t feed the trolls!" Agreed. Every damn comment section here is f'd up by that damn troll. And people keep feeding it.

    3. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Watched it. Some thoughts:

      1) You can argue that many people approaching the Capitol steps on the West side never saw the signs letting them know they were in a restricted area. But you'd think that standing there as the police are deploying smoke and other crowd-dispersal munitions would be a very clear sign, hard to miss, that should tell someone, "The police don't think we're allowed to be here." So definitely, a lot of people missed the opportunity to leave.

      2) The narrator refers to stinger grenades as simply "grenades," implying police were throwing grenades into the crowd. Just accurately describe the thing you're talking about if you want to spread truth and not a narrative. It's an hour-long documentary, so taking 12 seconds to explain to someone what a stinger grenade does isn't going to affect the momentum of your documentary.

      3) Trying to engender sympathy for the guy who climbed up outside of the railing trying to get around police just doesn't work for me. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

      4) The people who claim Trump didn't respond or do anything, or is guilty of inaction, are just narrative building. His first tweet happened before there was an officially declared "riot." His second came just as the building was being breached.

      5) CPD is clearly too incompetent to be trust with gas cannisters.

      6) It really is impressive how people pretend like Ray Epps is some innocent in all of this.

      So to some extent I'm unimpressed-it's very sympathetic to the rioters. Not the protestors, but people who were actually rioting and engaging in shoving matches with police. A lot of them ended up overcharged, sure, but it's ridiculous to portray them as if they're American patriots.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        We've had the state and media's narratives for years. This is largely the videos they refused to show.

        Do you find it sympathetic outright or just against the previously presented narrative. I thought it was fairly neutral.

        1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

          I definitely do not consider it "neutral." It's just pushing a different agenda. Even in a strict timeline, there's a selection bias about which cameras they're using and what is being omitted. This goes beyond it and frames a narrative. Guy gets pushed off the stairway where he's crawling up the outside of the railing, and the narrator says, "Some would call that attempted murder." Neutral would just be acknowledging what happened, that he got shoved off, without editorializing the framing.

          They also say that the surge on the east side of the building was clearly only caused by the misfired smoke bomb. Purely factual would be showing that, explaining that the police retreated, and then letting the evidence speak for itself.

          I'm not a fan of people trying to spin or frame events when they can just offer evidence and let me sort it out myself.

          1. NOYB2   1 year ago

            I’m not a fan of people trying to spin or frame events when they can just offer evidence and let me sort it out myself.

            Evidence is never neutral and doesn't sort itself out. That's why our justice system is adversarial.

            Each side presents evidence for their point of view and then people make a decision. That's the way our courts work and that's the way the court of public opinion works.

    4. SRG2   1 year ago

      Cops clearly unable to manage the rioters:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQaeg1d82Lo

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Did you see the video of them opening the doors, removing the barricades and giving some protesters tours, or would that wreck your religious beliefs?

    5. R Mac   1 year ago

      Meanwhile only 6 months for the guy that actually incited people to go into the capitol building. But don’t you dare say it looks like an inside job.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        https://www.bizpacreview.com/2024/01/03/doj-recommend-only-6-months-of-prison-for-ray-epps-1424583/

        1. Ersatz   1 year ago

          will he spend even 1 day in jail?

  4. mad.casual   1 year ago

    The Harvard president plagiarism discourse is so weird because, like, this is obviously plagiarism but the whole scandal is so politically coded that the dude who was plagiarized is like “no biggie”

    I don't know who David Canon is but I'm having trouble avoiding the logically inescapable conclusion that if copying his ideas provides no added or loss of value to any discourse he should be shitcanned too.

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      If academics cannot enforce the rules THEY create evenly...what is the point in having academics?

      1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

        You are missing the point of having rules.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Selective enforcement?

        2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          Rules don't apply to black women?

        3. Roberta   1 year ago

          Rules are meant to serve people. People are not meant to serve rules.

      2. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

        The appropriate reference here is Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" - "“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against. We're after power and we mean it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."

        1. Ersatz   1 year ago (edited)

          She really did nail it there

          22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.... so the state will have to make it an offense

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Carol Swain, who Gay stole from, disagreed it wasn't a big deal. She asked Gay to step down.

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/claudine-gay-and-my-scholarship-plagiarism-elite-system-unearned-position-24e4a1b1

      1. Ska   1 year ago

        I've tried to post comments to the NYT steering people to that op-ed. It's remarkable how hard people are willing to fight to avoid confronting reality.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Dude, that's just your reality. How dare you confront their (imaginary) lived experiences?

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          See sarc above. Literally admits he’d rather be wrong than agree with people he hates. I’m guessing the average NYT consumer is the same.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Yeah. I should probably bookmark that comment.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              It’s an amazing admission.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Now lets see you praise Biden for continuing the economic policies of Trump you defended by calling the detractors "leftists."

                1. R Mac   1 year ago

                  What policies of Trump’s that I defended by calling his detractors leftists are you referring to?

              2. NOYB2   1 year ago

                It’s an amazing admission.

                For sarc, it's really not surprising.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    "In one example that drew ridicule, Dr. Gay appeared to borrow exact phrases from the acknowledgments section of another author's book to thank her mentor and family in the acknowledgments section of her own dissertation."

    I'm sure she'll make a killing on Cameo.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      I hear the CCP Intellectual Property Acquisition Team is recruiting Gay.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      She’s still getting paid almost 900 gr.

      1. Chumby   1 year ago

        O feel bad for the fifty-centers here. They copy and past the Media Matters material and only get paid a couple of quarters to do so.

      2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        If only I could get punished like that.

  6. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    The Chinese Communist Party does an about-face on the how-many-kids question, now trying to pressure women into having more babies due to worries about less-than-expected population growth. Women are receiving calls from government officials attempting to exert pressure on matters of family planning, per a Wall Street Journal report.

    You can lead a couple to bed, but you can't make them fuck.

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      If a man goes down on his wife there, he'll just have to go down on her again an hour later or so.

      1. DesigNate   1 year ago

        What you did there, I saw it.

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      It doesn't say phoning couples, just the foxes...

    3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

      Have you seen how ugly the average Chinese person is? There is a reason most of the modles in China are Mongolian

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        We should come up with some kind of way to help them out in that department. I dunno, maybe bind their feet or something?

    4. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      It says something damn dehumanizing about Totalitarianism that it's citizen/subjects have to be told that they can fuck.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        It's not that they "can" fuck. The totalitarian CCP approach is telling people they must fuck (as opposed to the previous edict that prohibited fucking).

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago (edited)

          Perhaps I should have phrased it as “whether, when, or how to fuck.”

          Yes, you are correct. “What’s not prohibited is mandatory” is indeed the Totalitarian principle of human conduct.

          Here’s an except from the story about one woman who lived under both Deng Xiaoping and present Emperor Xi Jinping, who caught Hell both coming and going, so to speak:

          A decade ago, a woman surnamed Zhang was in a cat-and-mouse game with authorities after she decided to have a second child. She asked that her first name not be used.

          While pregnant, she left her job to stay out of public view, fearful officials would pressure her to have an abortion, she said. After giving birth, in 2014, she stayed with relatives for a year. When she returned home, local family-planning officials fined her and her husband around $10,000. She said she was forced to have an intrauterine device implanted to prevent pregnancy. Authorities required her to have it checked every three months.

          Months later, the Chinese government announced the one-child policy would be scrapped. For a while, authorities still demanded Zhang have her IUD checked.

          She now gets text messages from officials encouraging her to have more children. She deletes them in anger. “I wish they would stop tossing us around,” she said, “and leave us ordinary people alone.”

          China Is Pressing Women to Have More Babies. Many Are Saying No. Story by Liyan Qi • 1d https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/china-is-pressing-women-to-have-more-babies-many-are-saying-no/ar-AA1mkKCb

          This has all the makings of an episode of “Great Moments in Unintended Consequences.”

        2. NOYB2   1 year ago

          The totalitarian CCP approach is telling people they must fuck

          Communist and fascist regimes frequently want more children. That's also why they usually are so anti-homosexual, on the mistaken belief that if you threaten homosexuals with concentration camps, hard labor, or execution, they'll start producing children.

  7. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Feds at the EEOC and other federal agencies are using every possible redaction to hide anti white bias bias and working with 3rd party activist groups to change how the federal government operates.

    https://justthenews.com/accountability/watchdogs/feds-hide-anti-white-discrimination-complaints-names-policy-architects

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      My good racism protects me from your bad racism.

  8. JesseAz   1 year ago

    DCs solution to car jacking is to continue to hand out air tags to monitor the citizens.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/crime/dc-police-free-airtags-rise-car-theft

  9. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Lies by lying liars.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pentagons-extremism-our-ranks-propaganda-debunked-their-own-study

    Recall 2021... when the Biden FBI deployed counterterrorism resources against concerned parents who showed up at school board meetings, and Gen. Mark Milley told Congress that he wanted "to understand White rage" one month after an enraged father was dragged out of a Loudon County, Virginia school board meeting after his daughter was raped by a transgender boy in the girl's bathroom - which the school board then covered up.

    Remember that?

    And instead of addressing the concerns of millions of angry parents who had woken up to a nationwide phenomenon of mentally ill schoolteachers, critical race theory / DEI indoctrination, and transgender boys crushing the dreams of female athletes, the Biden administration turned the whole thing into a 'white rage' problem caused by extremist Trump supporters.

    In December of 2021, the Pentagon furthered the 'white rage' narrative, warning that 'extremism' within the ranks was on the rise, which would require 'detailed new rules' to prohibit service members from engaging in 'certain activities.'

    Turns out that was total bullshit...

    According to the Wall Street Journal, "Good news: The U.S. military isn’t packed with violent extremists."

    The researchers found that "the prevalence of extremist and gang-related activity that are reflected in court-martial opinions is limited to fewer than 20 cases" since 2012, for example.

    One conclusion was that the military doesn't need a new section of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to punish alleged "extremists" in the ranks, and that commanders can simply rely on Article 116 (riot or breach of peace), Article 88 (contempt toward officials), Article 109 (destruction or damage to property), and Article 115 (communication of threats), as well as others.

    The researchers also found that "fewer than ten" out of more than 700 Jan. 6 cases involved active members of the military, debunking yet another leftist claim.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      If the left could not lie, what would they have to say?

      1. Ersatz   1 year ago

        We could ask Al Franken... but i dont think we'd get an honest answer.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    California will start mandating that large retailers set aside some toy aisles as gender-neutral.

    Welcome to the Ken aisle.

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      Seems like a pretty easy work around to just keep everything the same, (barbie aisle, hot wheels aisle), and have the sign above the aisles say "Toys". If anyone questions it just say "are you assuming the toys genders?"

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        My thoughts exactly. Any child or adult of any sex or gender can look at and pick up any toy they want, as long as an adult ultimately pays for them.

        And if any Jackboots asked about my store's toy policies, that's what I would tell them before escorting them out with a not-so-toy firearm on my hip.

      2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        I can't recall a label in a department store that even says, "Boys" and "girls" in relation to toys.

        They do have boys' clothes and girls' clothes, which is extremely problematic.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Or go with the flow.

        Pink guns for girls and model electric cars for boys.

      4. JesseAz   1 year ago

        It used to be girls and boys can play with the same toy. It is now if you play with a doll as a boy you need to transition or if you play sports as a girl you need to transition.

      5. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Yeah, didn't we hear for 30 years or so that boys can play with dolls if they want to?

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          My son asked for an easy bake oven 25 years ago and he got it. They were marketed to girls but in our house he saw Mom and Dad cooking dinner every day. He's a great cook today as is his wife and his son and daughter. This is a cure to a problem that doesn't exist. Leftists are determined to promote gender roles and racism. Nobody else gives a shit.

          1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

            Leftists just want to break shit and be schizophrenic.

    2. Chumby   1 year ago

      Gavin Newsom dolls also available there. Contains very small parts.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        Most notably the brain. The entire doll is a dickhead.

        1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

          Zing!

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        French Laundry and hair salon sold separately.

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          Is getting held captive in a French Laundry worse than being held captive in a Chinese Laundry? I would imagine maybe.
          🙂
          😉

    3. Anomalous   1 year ago

      Because "gender-neutral" toys aren't (and can't be) defined, they could just declare any aisle the Gender Neutral toy aisle. In fact, move the sign around on a weekly basis.

      1. Zeb   1 year ago

        And if anyone complains call them sexist.

    4. Eeyore   1 year ago

      Shouldn’t they first mandate gender neutral shoe sizes? Those being different is super sexist. Also, if someone is one of the now 1000 or more other genders how the fk are they getting shoes?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        I've always wondered why shoe sizes even come as men's versus women's. One would think that with one scale (men's), women would use the much smaller number for vanity reasons.

        /I'll see myself out.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Nobody needs 23 different shoe sizes.

        2. Zeb   1 year ago

          I don't think there is any particular reason for it. Euro shoe sizes are unisex, I believe. Women's clothing sizes are weird too. How is one number adequate? I guess that's part of why women have to try on so many things before buying.

          1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            Men's clothes don't even have number. S M L XL XXL

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Nice shirts and suits do have numbers. Shirts commonly have neck sizes (such as 18-1/2) and suits go by chest sizes (like 50). They're also made in long lengths for those of us with longer arms (like 34-35), but all of these sizes are based on the inches around the neck, chest, and arm length.

              Then there are pant sizes by waist and inseam (36x30) also done by inches.

            2. Zeb   1 year ago

              Yeah, for t-shirts and stuff for people who don't care if they look like slobs. For nice shirts and pretty much all pants and suits there are meaningful measurements.

              1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

                I mostly wear khakis and dickies to work.

                1. Zeb   1 year ago

                  Don't they have waist/inseam sizes? All the casual pants (not sweat pants or pajamas) I buy do.

            3. Chumby   1 year ago

              XXXL XXXXL Jeff

          2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

            Women’s clothing sizes are weird too. How is one number adequate?

            It's not. Women's clothing sizes are as retarded as pipe sizes. Possibly worse, somehow.

  11. Ajsloss   1 year ago

    YOU NEVER KNOW who may be menstruating

    I mean, it says it right there at the beginning of the word. We don't call it womenstruating (probably because there is confusion about what a woman is).

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Yup. Menstruation like all other biology is a social construct.

  12. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

    Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism

    The MSN cannot help themselves. How TF is plagiarism a conservative weapon and not a self-inflicted wound?

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      Conservatives believe in SOME rules, bare minimum. The Left only believes in power.

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        The Left only believes in power.

        And The Science.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          The Science as far as it leads to Power.

          1. damikesc   1 year ago

            Yup. Biology is no longer "Science" to the Left.

            It ain't Social Science, it ain't actually science.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              Political science.

            2. NOYB2   1 year ago

              Sadly, the way science has been going, social science is little different from STEM.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Accountability is an alt right, white supremacy belief.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Is that why you oppose Trump being held accountable for anything and everything?

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            What would you hold him accountable for?

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              For pointing out his lack of principles, lies, being a leftist defending neocon, ignorance, etc.

            2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              For starters being a crybaby who convinced morons like you that the election was stolen resulting in J6, not to mention the various other crimes committed while trying to overturn the election. And potentially bringing down the Republic by getting half the voting public to lose faith in the electoral process, forever ending the peaceful transition of power that made this country unique for two and a half centuries.

              Little things like that.

              1. damikesc   1 year ago

                Yes, TRUMP eroded trust in the electoral system. Not Democrats screaming fraud for every Presidential election they lost since 1988. Not that at all.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  Because screaming fraud is the same as trying to change the results by force. Sure. Whatever you say.

                  1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago (edited)

                    What force?

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Oh yeah. You call it peaceful tourists milling about.

                    2. DesigNate   1 year ago

                      Have you watched the videos sarc? The overwhelming majority of people outside AND inside the building committed no violence or property damage.

                      Regardless, Trump didn't use force.

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Trump didn't use force, and Hitler didn't kill a single Jew by his own hand. So neither are responsible for what others did.

                    4. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      What did Trump do, Sarcasmic? Hitler ordered Himmler's final solution. Are you claiming Trump ordered the J6 protesters? If so, when and what did he say?

                    5. DesigNate   1 year ago

                      I mean, in an ultimate sense, no one is responsible for another person's action or inaction.

                      And yes, I bolded Trump because your original comment alluded to him using force.

                      Also, if you have concrete evidence that Trump ordered people to get all rioty and try some insurrection, you should probably call the FBI and get it to them so they can charge him (and the people that were at the Capitol) for it.

                  2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                    What about manipulating government agencies to justify a bogus impeachment?

                  3. R Mac   1 year ago

                    Trump literally said be peaceful.

                    God damn sarc, you really are just full in on the leftist establishment narrative, facts be damned.

                    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      Sarcasmic knows. He's seen the speeches, tweets and all the video posted here.
                      At this point he's either trolling or lying. Those are the only two options.

              2. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

                What other forms of speech should be criminalized Herr Sarc?

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I'm talking about force, not speech. As long as you're making Nazi references, you should remember "Papiere, bitte!" The favorite German phrase of all of Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS).

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                    WTF are you talking about using force? Force was never used in the 2020 election and accusations of fraud. That's all speech. Politically protected by 1A speech.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      You're aware that he's on trial, right?

                    2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                      Sarc, Donald Trump is not charged with using "force." He's charged with conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights. And a major part of his defense on all four of those indictments is going to be that he was exercising his First Amendment protected rights.

                    3. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Lmao. You’re such a clown sarc.

              3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                For starters being a crybaby ….

                The biggest crime of all.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  He certainly cornered the market in victimhood. There really isn't anything he's not a victim of and everyone is out to get him. Such a victim. Victim, victim, victim. He should copyright "I'm a victim" instead of "You're fired."

                  1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                    He’s going to be re-elected.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      And if he's not, Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS) will say he was a poor, poor victim, and they're victims by extension. So many victims.

                    2. DesigNate   1 year ago

                      "will say he was a poor, poor victim, and they’re victims by extension. So many victims."

                      They very well might. What they almost assuredly won't do (en masse at least) is violently attack anyone who disagrees with them.

                  2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

                    "He certainly cornered the market in victimhood."

                    Do you consider him a competitor?

              4. Super Scary   1 year ago

                "And potentially bringing down the Republic by getting half the voting public to lose faith in the electoral process"

                Were you asleep during Trump's presidency? The democrats went full force on that.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                  Were you asleep during Trump’s presidency? The democrats went full force on that.

                  Some would have claimed passed out drunk, but that's what some would have claimed.

                2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Hell. Both W presidencies too.

                3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                  C'mon now. They only spent hundreds of millions of Zuckerbucks to *secure* the elections--fortify them, as it were--to make sure that everything turned out for the common good. Nothing at all like these baseless charges of bribing elections officials with attention and cash to get biased third parties to be treated like an extension of elections officials (let me have a key to the storage room where ballot are secured!). Nothing at all like using social media ownership to censor political messages!

                  "That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.

                  “Most of our planning takes us through Election Day,” he noted. “But, we are not prepared for the two most likely outcomes”–Trump losing and refusing to concede, and Trump winning the Electoral College (despite losing the popular vote) by corrupting the voting process in key states.

                  In November 2019, Mark Zuckerberg invited nine civil rights leaders to dinner at his home, where they warned him about the danger of the election-related falsehoods that were already spreading unchecked. “It took pushing, urging, conversations, brainstorming, all of that to get to a place where we ended up with more rigorous rules and enforcement,” says Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, who attended the dinner and also met with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and others. (Gupta has been nominated for Associate Attorney General by President Biden.) “It was a struggle, but we got to the point where they understood the problem. Was it enough? Probably not. Was it later than we wanted? Yes. But it was really important, given the level of official disinformation, that they had those rules in place and were tagging things and taking them down.”

                  "Emails show that Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, a fellow with the National Vote at Home Institute, directed Green Bay city employees in gathering and counting absentee ballots on Election Day, and that he was granted access by the city to secured areas and served as an on-site contact for the department on election night. Rubenstein, who did not respond to a call seeking an interview, also provided help in “curing” ballots that were turned in without the appropriate information, including a signature or address.

                  1. R Mac   1 year ago

                    I’m assuming that’s from the Time article?

                    Yeah, that’s been posted here multiple times. Sarc’s not going to read it. It doesn’t match the leftist narrative.

                    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                      It *is* the leftist narrative. The Time article *lauds* all of these actions as good things, since the fortifications ensured that Trump lost.

                      What is surprising in the Times article is that they come right out and say it!

              5. Zeb   1 year ago

                There is plenty of blame to go around when it comes to people losing faith in the election system. There are plenty on the left who still think the election was stolen for Trump by Russians in 2016. And the response to people's concerns about 2020 has been pretty terrible if the aim is to make people more confident in the elections. It really doesn't matter if accusations of fraud are true or not. If a significant part of the voting public thinks there are problems, you need to take that seriously and be as transparent as possible.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  If a significant part of the voting public thinks there are problems, you need to take that seriously and be as transparent as possible.

                  Would it matter? We're talking about people who declared fraud because they didn't like the results, went looking for it, didn't find it, and still insist that it occurred. You think transparency will help? It will just make them look even more foolish as they continue to insist that they lost due to cheating.

                  1. Zeb   1 year ago

                    I don't know. I think it would matter to some people. Calling that many people a bunch of stupid liars and dismissing their concerns isn't helping matters anyway.

                    1. R Mac   1 year ago

                      This is what you’re trying to have an honest conversation with:

                      piritus Mundi 3 hours ago
                      Flag Comment Mute User
                      So what you are saying is you opinion of the matter is based on what your oppents think?

                      Reply
                      sarcasmic 2 hours ago
                      Flag Comment Mute User
                      I’m saying that some people are so despicable that I’d rather disagree with them then have something in common with them.

                      There’s no amount of evidence about the election that will change sarc’s mind. None.

                    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      There are liars who promote fraud while switching the burden of proof, and there are those who believe them. Confronting the liars will make no difference because they're liars, and the people who believe them can't be rationalized out of something they came to by emotion.

                      People need to step out of their bubbles. They make sense on the inside but look foolish from the outside.

                    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Sarcs preferred cleanest election narrative is far more insidious in face of election fraud claims. Laws were violated. Counts stopped and restarted. Courts used to disrupt laws. Meanwhile a while segment of society refuses to admit even the proven claims exist. Sarc refuses to admit it as well. An ever shifting narrative and excuses made for the documented issues. Then a doubling done in 2022. Now two elections have been adjudicated as false. People admit to filling out other people's ballots. All happening and they still claim elections are clean.

                      You want to lose trust in elections, thats how. Democrats even admitted to fortified elections. They admit to illegal ballot harvesting. Politicians have filled out false ballot applications. And now want everyone automatically registered to even not know who actually decided to register.

                    4. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Sarc:

                      sarcasmic 2 hours ago
                      Flag Comment Mute User
                      I’m saying that some people are so despicable that I’d rather disagree with them then have something in common with them.

                      Also sarc:

                      and the people who believe them can’t be rationalized out of something they came to by emotion.

                  2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                    Democrats 2016 insurrection was just smaller "The states were counted, but three protestors started yelling from the visitors’ gallery of the chamber. "
                    1:09 P.M. ET: Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts rose to object to the certificate from Alabama.
                    “The electors were not lawfully certified, especially given the confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia,” McGovern said.

                    Biden denied McGovern on the grounds that he didn’t have a senator’s signature on his written objection.

                    1:14 P.M.: Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland rose to object to 10 of Florida’s 29 electoral votes.

                    “They violated Florida’s prohibition against dual office holders,” Raskin said.

                    Again, despite the fact that Raskin pointed out that he had his objection in writing, he failed to get a senator’s signature.

                    1:15 P.M.: No sooner had the Florida question been settled than its neighbor to the north was the subject of another objection, when Washington’s Rep. Pramila Jayapal objected to Georgia’s vote certificate.

                    “It is over,” Biden told the congresswoman.

                    1:21 P.M.: Rep. Barbara Lee of California brought up voting machines and Russian hacking when she objected following the counting of Michigan’s votes.

                    “People are horrified by the overwhelming evidence of Russian interference in our election,” Lee said.

                    Once again, her objection was denied for the lack of a senator’s signature. They also turned off her microphone.

                    1:23 P.M.: After New York’s tally was read, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas stood up to object.

                    “I object on the massive voter suppression that included –” Jackson Lee began.

                    “The debate is not in order,” Biden interrupted. Again, the congresswoman lacked a senator’s signature.

                    1:28 P.M.: Arizona’s Rep. Raul Grijalva rose to object after North Carolina’s tally. He tried to object on violations of the Voting Rights Act, but Biden shut him down.

                    As you may have guessed, he didn’t have the signature of a senator.

                    Once he gave up, Jackson Lee tagged him out and tried to object to the votes herself. They cut off her microphone, too.

                    “There is no debate. There is no debate. There is no debate,” a visibly agitated Biden said as he gaveled.

                    1:31 PM: Jackson Lee made another appearance minutes later after South Carolina’s certification.

                    “There is no debate in the joint session,” Biden said, shutting her down once more.

                    1:36 PM: Biden must have thought, after five minutes of peace and getting through the state of West Virginia, that the House members might observe the rules. Lee wasn’t even able to make it through her objection before Biden said, “There is no debate.”

                    They cut off her microphone again.

                    1:37 PM: Wisconsin’s votes had been read. With just Wyoming to go, the finish line was in reach.

                    Jackson Lee once again tried to make an objection on the grounds of Russian interference in the election.

                    “The objection cannot be received,” Biden said.

                    1:38 PM: The final state’s votes had been read. Then entered California Rep. Maxine Waters.

                    Taking a play from her own book – she objected to the certification of George W. Bush’s 2000 election – Waters admitted that she didn’t have a senator’s signature on her objection.

                    “I wish to ask: Is there one United States senator who will join me in this letter of objection?” Waters asked. Through House Speaker Paul Ryan’s chuckle and boos from the rest of the chamber, it was clear that there was not.

                    1:40 PM: The states were counted, but three protestors started yelling from the visitors’ gallery of the chamber. At least one of them was reciting the Constitution as he was taken away by security.

                  3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                    The Wisconsin Supreme Court did rule that the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) gave inappropriate advice in its guidance to local elections clerks that drop boxes are a valid way to return an absentee ballot. It also ruled that no one can return a ballot in person on behalf of another voter, according to state law, despite what the WEC may have told local officials about allowing ballot harvesting.

                    What they said basically, was that "If Wisconsin wants drop boxes and ballot harvesting, the legislature knows how to write laws to allow them..."

                    Specifically:

                    ¶49Third, the legislature knows how to write a statute accomplishing the work DRW would have Wis. Stat. §5.06 perform. SeeState v. Yakich, 2022 WI8, ¶24, 400 Wis.2d549, 970 N.W.2d12 (explaining plain meaning may be derived by looking at differences between two statutes and noting "the legislature knew how to draft [different] language"

                    ...

                    ¶53Subchapter IV of chapter 6 of the Wisconsin statutes begins with a statement of legislative policy that cannot be reconciled with the statements of policy contained in WEC's memos:

                    LEGISLATIVE POLICY.The legislature finds that voting is a constitutional right, the vigorous exercise of which should be strongly encouraged. In contrast, voting by absentee ballot is a privilege exercised wholly outside the traditional safeguards of the polling place. The legislature finds that the privilege of voting by absentee ballot must be carefully regulated to prevent the potential for fraud or abuse; to prevent overzealous solicitation of absent electors who may prefer not to participate in an election; to prevent undue influence on an absent elector to vote for or against a candidate or to cast a particular vote in a referendum; or other similar abuses.

                    The statutory requirements governing absentee voting must be completely satisfied or ballots may not be counted:

                    INTERPRETATION. Notwithstanding s. 5.01 (1), with respect to matters relating to the absentee ballot process, ss. 6.86, 6.87 (3) to (7) and 9.01 (1) (b) 2. and 4. shall be construed as mandatory. Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be counted. Ballots counted in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election.

                    §6.84(2). "[M]andatory" election requirements "must be strictly adhered to" and "strictly observed." State ex rel. Ahlgrimm v. State Elections Bd., 82 Wis.2d585,592–93, 263 N.W.2d152 (1978).

                    ¶54Despite these provisions, no defendant can point to any statute authorizing ballot drop boxes; instead, the defendants argue no statute expressly prohibits them. The absence of an express prohibition, however, does not mean drop boxes comport with "the procedures specified" in the election laws. Wis. Stat. §6.84(2). Nothing in the statutory language detailing the procedures by which absentee ballots may be cast mentions drop boxes or anything like them.

                    B. The Merits

                    WEC's staff may have been trying to make voting as easy as possible during the pandemic, but whatever their motivations, WEC must follow Wisconsin statutes. Good intentions never override the law.[25]

                    [25]Justice Ann Walsh Bradley accuses the court of "erect[ing] yet another barrier for voters," dissent, ¶205, but to the extent any "barriers" to voting exist, they are of the legislature's making. Establishing rules governing the casting of ballots outside of election day rests solely within the power of the people's representatives because such regulations affect only the privilege of absentee voting and not the right to vote itself. Justice Ann Walsh Bradley says "[a] ballot drop box is a simple and perfectly legal solution to make voting easier[.]" Id., ¶207. While they might be a simple solution, the decision to devise solutions to make voting easier belongs to the legislature, not WEC and certainly not the judiciary. While the dissenters would permit ballot drop boxes, the court must respect the constitutional restraints on our power and refuse to act as a super-legislature. It poses a grave threat to democracy to mislead the people into believing we are one.

    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Original thought is racism.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        And heresy.

  13. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Carrying more weapons than anyone on January 6, 2021...

    https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_d5e3b9cc-a9c1-11ee-a80f-0f64c159492f.html

    A Venezuelan man who illegally entered the U.S. was arrested after wielding a machete and knife in the U.S. Capitol building the day after Christmas. He is being processed for removal.

    Jose Leonardo Marquez-Marquez, a 23-year-old Venezuelan national, was arrested by U.S. Capitol Police on Dec. 26 for carrying a machete, a butcher’s knife and a brick at the U.S. Capitol. He was charged with carrying a dangerous weapon and possessing a prohibited weapon.

    He was taken into custody the next day by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ICE ERO) agents in Washington, D.C.

    He is among an untold number of people who illegally entered the U.S. and once caught were released into the United States by Border Patrol agents only to later be arrested for committing a crime, as The Center Square has previously reported.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      He was going to use those things to build a food truck.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Machetes are needed for the coconut shrimp he was making.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Still three more weapons than Ashli Babbit was carrying.

          1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            Dude, Babbit was white, She IS the weapon.

            1. Super Scary   1 year ago

              She was also a veteran, so on the left's hierarchy she is easily below an armed illegal immigrant.

            2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

              She could have cried some White Woman Tears and it would have been genocide.

    2. NOYB2   1 year ago

      So, if you are an illegal migrant, committing a violent felony just results in getting a free ticket back to your home country?

  14. JesseAz   1 year ago

    seem to have realized that the university's problem is not just one single administrator or young people embracing Hamas-apologist ideas. "I came to learn that the root cause of antisemitism at Harvard was an ideology that had been promulgated on campus, an oppressor/oppressed framework, that provided the intellectual bulwark behind the protests, helping to generate anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hate speech and harassment," wrote Ackman.

    Still amazes me seemingly intelligent people are just learning this. Many here have discussed this for decades. Yet these people are shocked.

    Wonder what their preferred news sources are.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      I think dismissing it all as inconsequential is wrong. For better or worse, Harvard graduates steeped in DEI ideology have gone on to infect all kinds of other industries with their foolish ideas. And, if the 30-year-olds haven't risen in the ranks enough at present, they surely will in the future: In 2021, 41 of the companies on the Fortune 500 list were helmed by Harvard alums (Amazon CEO Andy Jassy and JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, for example). If the fever breaks at Harvard, as Ackman and others seem to desire, that will have ripple effects.

      Indoctrination is the goal. This is the loudly advertised long March through the institutions. They aren't quiet about it.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        The most confrontational leftist end members dared us to stop them when they started the march. Now the leftist establishment dares us to do anything at all.

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      My only question is why it took a decade for powerhouse donors like Ackman to realize what was going on. If someone had been minding the store, Gay would never have been hired in the first place.

      The store is minded by activists in academia. The media is just as corrupt as these institutions.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Many of those seemingly intelligent people had their own left biases, and were happy to be in the Big Tent, and pal around with the left elite. But then the core leftist mission of intersectional group conflict caught up with them.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Purity spirals rarely end well.

        "One aspect that stands out in all purity spirals is the vanity of small differences, and the punishing of people for the most minor transgressions.

        "This follows a now dismally familiar pattern: two camps are identified, the acceptable “for” and the demonised “against”. The latter are cast beyond the pale, cancelled and trolled. Identity politics has become a secular religion and, like any strict sect, apostates are severely punished.

        This can lead to a “purity spiral”, with the more extreme opinion the more rewarded in a pattern of increasing escalation. Nuance and debate are the casualties, and a kind of moral feeding frenzy results.

        The lesson: purity spirals can topple authoritarian regimes, but assist new authoritarians in ruining the lives of innocent people. They turn families and friends against one another.

        As polarisation intensifies, people are increasingly loath to consider opinions that don’t reinforce their own. Quite literally the road to hell can be paved with good intentions.

    4. DesigNate   1 year ago

      If you believed it before, you were just a conspiracy theorist.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Facts changed!

  15. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    In New York, private schools are now required to offer menstrual products, free of charge, in bathrooms.

    Can afford private school but not tampons.

    1. Chumby   1 year ago

      Legislators wanted to pad the schools monthly outflows.

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        This is all about the government controlling our private spaces... period.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          They all have blood on their hands.

          1. Chumby   1 year ago

            Doesn’t take a Mense member to figure that out.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              Hey, what smells like old tuna?

      2. Anomalous   1 year ago

        Quit ragging on them.

    2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      Back in Junior High School, they got all the girls separate from the boys in the auditorium and gave them feminine pads. A lot of them ended up up stuck on the sides of the school busses.

      "More Great Moments in Unintended Consequences."
      🙂
      😉

      Not say anything should be a law, of course, but feminine pads and tampons are a great addition to First Aid Kits for the home, the vehicle, and the Survivalist/Prepper Bug-Out Bag (B.O.B.). They are perfect for profuse bleeding and sucking chest wounds.

      Maybe the private school head could pointedly remind the inspectors of that and they'll back the Hell up and go away.
      🙂
      😉

  16. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The buildings survive because New York is preserving the corporeal city of bricks and steel at the expense of its residents and of those who might live here.

    Serves those who might live here right.

  17. damikesc   1 year ago

    I've seen a FEW feminists wondering how we went from Kavanaugh's yearbook showing he was an unrepentant rapist to trying to justify raping Israelis on 10/7.

    Feminism is, and always has been, an embarrassing joke.

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      I don't know about always. There are some second-wavers that have made some good points.

    2. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      It's called doublethink.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        You know how flighty the ladies can be.

    3. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Kavanaugh is an oppressor (white), Gazans are oppressed (brown).

      When you are oppressed, any action is justified against the oppressors. Doesn't matter how horrendous.

      I've heard exactly this from white liberal women in the US.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Do they have Phds in victim studies?

      2. Zeb   1 year ago (edited)

        Gazans are about as brown as Italians (and not even Sicilians).

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          Arabs and Persians were classified as "White" under an Immigration case before The Supremes. So the SJW//ESG/DIE crowd can't even get their own shit wired tight.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          Race wasn’t initially part of it anyway. But the system that Marxism initially grew under didn’t exist in the US, so they shifted to skin color. It’s easy just to switch back when it works for them.

      3. damikesc   1 year ago

        Keep forgetting that darker skin means one cannot be held to any standards.

        Curse my deficiency in DEI!

    4. Super Scary   1 year ago

      White man bad.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        You should write for the Atlantic.

  18. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Celebrating the New Year in Chiraq.

    https://cwbchicago.com/2024/01/chicago-new-years-gunfire-arrest-2024.html

    The new year is off to a rough start for Mauricio Guillen Lopez, the Back of the Yards resident who prosecutors say rang in 2024 by firing 80 rounds into the air from three firearms while carrying $13,000 worth of meth in his pocket.

    While Lopez may be accused of providing 2024 with the most—uh—enthusiastic welcome, he is not the only person arrested for allegedly firing weapons to welcome the new year.

    Also facing charges is 43-year-old Jermaine Mitchell. Chicago cops said they saw him running with a gun moments after they heard a gunshot in the 800 block of North Monticello around 11:15 p.m. on New Year’s Eve.

    “I’m sorry bro… I was just trying to celebrate New Year’s bro,” Mitchell told the officers, according to his arrest report. “I just ruined my whole life bro.”

    Here are some videos posted this week that reportedly show people firing guns to “celebrate” the new year in Chicago:

    The videos show people shooting into the air to celebrate the New Year on Lake Shore Drive and in the Back of the Yards neighborhood. Where do they think they are, Gaza?

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      $13k in your pocket ? Man, how expensive is meth nowadays??

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        If you gotta ask...

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        That's why he carries three weapons.

    2. Chumby   1 year ago (edited)

      Bullets fired into the air eventually come down, unlike Chicago’s crime rate.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        "...the experimental results are mixed. Hatcher calculated that his .30-caliber rifle bullets reached terminal velocity—the speed at which air resistance balances the accelerating force of gravity—at 300 feet per second. You might die from a bullet moving at that speed, but it’s unlikely. Lighter bullets, like those fired from a 9mm handgun, max out at even lower speeds, between 150 and 250 feet per second, according to computer models.

        "The general consensus is that a bullet fired straight up—at precisely 90 degrees to the horizontal—is unlikely to kill a healthy adult when it returns to Earth. That’s because, on the way down, air resistance prevents the bullet from returning to its initial velocity. The bullet would deliver a painful wallop but could only have a chance of killing you with a direct hit to the eye, ear, or mouth. Things aren’t likely to be much worse at angles just off the vertical.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          Youth BB guns produce velocities of 275- to 350-feet per second, and who hasn't been involved in a BB gun war? Stings, so long as you don't get hit in the eye--that ruins everything.

        2. Chumby   1 year ago

          https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912041/

          Those velocities are in the range of penetrating human skin and the skull.

        3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Mythbusters tested it.

          https://mythresults.com/episode50

          Bullets fired into the air maintain their lethal capability when they eventually fall back down.

          busted / plausible / confirmed

          In the case of a bullet fired at a precisely vertical angle (something extremely difficult for a human being to duplicate), the bullet would tumble, lose its spin, and fall at a much slower speed due to terminal velocity and is therefore rendered less than lethal on impact. However, if a bullet is fired upward at a non-vertical angle (a far more probable possibility), it will maintain its spin and will reach a high enough speed to be lethal on impact. Because of this potentiality, firing a gun into the air is illegal in most states, and even in the states that it is legal, it is not recommended by the police. Also the MythBusters were able to identify two people who had been injured by falling bullets, one of them fatally injured.

          (This is the only myth to receive all three ratings at the same time.)

          Looks like almost anything can happen when a bullet is shot straight up into the air.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            All the more reason not to do it.

            "I shot an error into the air.
            And it's still going everywhere."
            --Robert A. Heinlein's Lazarus Long.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...now trying to pressure women into having more babies due to worries about less-than-expected population growth.

    Best way to capture a man, too.

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      Elon Musk was right about this too, eh?

      Note: The people bemoaning global overcrowding are not dead, so they do not take it THAT seriously. You'd think Ehrlich would have swallowed a bullet by now if he bought his own BS.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Ehrlich is either a retard or a scam artist. And thus not likely to judge himself in the wrong.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    A top Hamas official, Saleh al-Arouri, was just killed in a drone strike in Beirut for which Israel has not yet claimed responsibility.

    The fool didn't realize it's supposed to be the peasants being martyred.

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Surprisingly the new york media mafia isn't declaring world War 6 yet.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        They will as soon as Trump is reelected.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Or learn anything from Munich.

  21. Jerry B.   1 year ago

    “A top Hamas official, Saleh al-Arouri, was just killed in a drone strike in Beirut for which Israel has not yet claimed responsibility.”

    “I am Spartacus”

  22. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    More previously redacted names of Jeffrey Epstein's buddies will be released soon.

    The ultimate and-then-nothing-happened.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago (edited)

      Until people start getting suicided left and right.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Premature exaltation.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      From Daily Fail:

      "The release of the long-awaited Jeffrey Epstein list of associates and high profile friends has been thrown into chaos by a woman who claims she will be in danger if named in her 'culturally conservative country'.

      The entire list of 187 names was due to become public this week, but a filing by a woman named in the court papers as 'John Doe 107' appears to have stalled it and caused confusion.

      On December 21, Judge Loretta Preska granted the woman a 30-day appeal, delaying the release of her name until January 22nd. She has until then to prove that she will be in danger if she is unmasked."

      Elites blue-balling everyone to remind us who's really in charge here.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        And speaking of Epstein, Jimmy Kimmel is squeaking because Aaron Rodgers made fun of him for not wanting the client list to be published:

        'Dear A***hole: for the record, I've not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any 'list' other than the clearly-phony nonsense that soft-brained wackos like yourself can't seem to distinguish from reality,' the comedian fumed.
        'Your reckless words put my family in danger. Keep it up and we will debate the facts further in court.'

        Dear commie fuckstain Kimmel:

        Rodgers never said you were on the list, he just said you didn't want to see it come out. That's not slander, that's an inference based on your behavior, when you mocking him as having CTE back in March for wanting to see it published.

        It was David Bakhtiari who actually said, blatantly, that you're on the list. But Rodgers is a HOF-track QB with millions, and Baktiari's a low-paid offensive guard, so I understand you think you can get a nice payday out of squealing like a child. Maybe if you weren't such a bitch-made leftist covering for your Hollywood and political elite friends, you wouldn't get made fun of like this.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Kimmel peaked intellectually as co-host of the Man Show. But he continues to achieve new heights of whiny leftist complaining, so there is that.

        2. windycityattorney   1 year ago

          The low paid offensive lineman is like a 5 time all pro selection and is actually one of the highest paid lineman in the NFL. He signed a 4yr deal in 2020 worth 92million dollars.

          Just thought I would clarify. Rogers made considerably more of course. Which is why the Packers couldn't afford all of them.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            That hardly refutes my point that Kimmel won't go after the guy who explicity said he was on the list. He's a lot more invested in trying to get one over on Rodgers, probably because A-A-Ron openly flouted Kimmel's Branch Covidian cult.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Yeah, but kudos to whatever government minion followed DEI policy to label this woman as John Doe.

    4. Chumby   1 year ago

      Post the list!

  23. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    Women are receiving calls from government officials...

    I'm taking the receiver off the phone because baby you and me
    This night we're gonna get it on to love serenade

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Stay away from my window
      Stay away from my back door too
      Disconnect the telephone line
      Relax baby and draw that blind

  24. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism

    Who knew the soft bigotry of low expectations could not be used as a shield for very long.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Plagiarism is just the academic version of reparations.

  25. Moonrocks   1 year ago (edited)

    The Chinese Communist Party…now trying to pressure women into having more babies

    Somehow, I doubt we’ll see Handmaid’s Tale protests about this.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Probably see the re-airing of Do Communist Have Better Sex?, though.

    2. Eeyore   1 year ago

      If they see the picture attached to this article, they might not be able to reproduce right away.

      1. D-Pizzle   1 year ago

        What are you talking about? Despite the masks, they look rather hot. They also look Japanese. Very much so.

  26. Moonrocks   1 year ago

    Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism

    I had to click through to make sure this headline wasn't a parody.

  27. Super Scary   1 year ago

    "A top Hamas official, Saleh al-Arouri, was just killed in a drone strike in Beirut for which Israel has not yet claimed responsibility."

    Maybe it was Russia's or Ukraine's drone? It'd be the cross-over event of the season! Just in time for sweeps!

  28. Sevo   1 year ago

    "Harvard's Affirmative Action Hire Gets the Boot"

    Thomas Sowell: "Affirmative Action is racism under new management".

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      But Good Racism >>>> Bad Racism

  29. Naime Bond   1 year ago

    Child labor in the US was declining *before* it was banned by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 Reason January 2023
    Homicide rates in ** was declining *before* it was banned by the 6th Commandment of DCCCLVII B.C. Reason January 925 B.C.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      Monocles fell out of fashion.

      1. SRG2   1 year ago

        Wasn't Monocles a one-eyed Greek philosopher?

        1. DesigNate   1 year ago

          Not bad, guv.

        2. NealAppeal   1 year ago

          Well Testicles had two of something...

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            And his Chinese cousin, Won Huang Lo?

    2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      Child labor declined as the overall demand for manual labor declined with the mechanization of both industrial and agricultural production in The Industrial Revolution.

      Also, as The Industrial Revolution made goods and services more plentiful and cheaper, fewer children were needed to labor and support the family, and thus couples needed and had fewer children.

      And with increase in the products and services for better nutrition, health, and sanitation, fewer children were stillborn, more survived childhood, and big broods of children changed from family assets working for the family to financial liabilities that people had to want. Thus, again, greater prosperity meant fewer children.

      Three cheers isn't enough for Capitalism and The Industrial Revolution!

  30. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    California will start mandating that large retailers set aside some toy aisles as gender-neutral.

    If a boy can be a girl, than aren't they already gender neutral and are just organized by genre?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      What's funny about California's law is that most toys are already sorted by manufacturer (Mattel, Hasbro, Lego, etc.) and type (Lego bricks, Barbie, Transformers, etc.) and not by whether they should be played with by a boy or a girl. I sincerely doubt Mattel wants their Barbie collection mixed in with Hasbro's GI Joe toys.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        What's funny about California's law is that there are actual toys that actually are biologically-coded to specific genders, and they're already sorted (and resorted) along various spectra, they've just been relegated to "Adult Toy Stores" for decades and the gendertards want to pretend like this isn't obviously about forcing people to aid in the warping of children's minds.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Don't give them ideas, or next year they will require child-appropriate dildos, nipple clamps, and strap-ons in toy stores.

          Because K-5 homework assignments.

          1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

            I would be surprised to hear that those don't already exist.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago (edited)

          Yeah, this is clearly all about appealing to the gender-specials and is completely fucking redundant if just saying “I’m a girl” when you’re actually a boy makes it so.

          This was the result of some marxist gender or ethnic studies grad claiming that segregating girls and boys things “reinforced patriarchal hegemony” or some other stupid nonsense. It’s also a clear example of why the SF-SD corridor needs to be turned into a quiet neighborhood for about 1,000 years.

      2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        Right. Over here is the Barbie aisle, with some related products and perhaps other dolls. Next aisle is action figures. Next aisle is nerf guns and toy cars. They're not labeled as "Girls over here, boys over there," even though kids do have preferences that seem to align to their gender.

      3. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        I sincerely doubt Mattel wants their Barbie collection mixed in with Hasbro’s GI Joe toys.

        The GI Joe's wouldn't mind that though.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Nissan had a great one for that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGMI_mWmb7g

          1. Krokko   1 year ago

            Man, I forgot all about that... Thanks for the trip down memory lane!

        2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Where do you think the baby dolls come from?

          1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

            You mean Barbie didn't abort them? Not much of a feminist icon, is she?

          2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            Well, it sure as hell isn't Ken.

        3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          What about Navy Joe?

          1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            He had Barbies at all of his ports of call and other Joes on board The Raging Queen.
            🙂
            😉

  31. Sevo   1 year ago

    The Associated Press
    @AP
    "Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism"

    Parody is not possible any longer.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      What do you want? Parody and satire, or vindictive culture war?

  32. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Donald Trump Flights on Jeffrey Epstein's 'Lolita Express'—What We Know
    Jan 02, 2024 at 10:58 AM EST

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-flights-jeffrey-epstein-jet-lolita-express-1857109

    Fox News and wingnut.com breathlessly covered Bill Clinton's involvement - not the leading candidate for the GOP nominiation.

    #DennyHastertConservatism

    1. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "There is no evidence that Trump visited Epstein's notorious Little St. James island, where the late financier is alleged to have trafficked and sexually abused young women and girls. Trump has also never been implicated in the offenses committed by Epstein or Maxwell."

      Wow, it's fucking nothing. How many paintings of Trump in a dress do you think Epstein had?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        There is no evidence Bill Clinton was grabbing pussy there either.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Wanna try again, Pluggo, as you're on a losing streak?

          https://nypost.com/2023/12/31/news/bill-clinton-to-be-identified-as-doe-36-and-named-over-50-times-in-upcoming-epstein-doc-dump/

          Former President Bill Clinton will be identified as “John Doe 36” in a trove of court documents related to late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein which are expected to be released this week, according to a report.

          Clinton, 77, is mentioned more than 50 times across redacted documents related to a 2015 lawsuit from Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, according to ABC News.

          [Image:] Bill Clinton is given a shoulder massage by Epstein victim Chauntae Davies at a small airport in Portugal in 2002.

          Why would Clinton be given a should massage by an Epstein victim?

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            GRAB EM BY THE SHOULDER!

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Again, why would Clinton get a massage from an Epstein victim in an airport?

              Are you that desperate to defend Democrats at any cost, Pluggo? Take the L with grace. You got it the hard way; you've earned it.

            2. Sevo   1 year ago

              turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
              If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
              turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        3. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Except the numerous flights and multiple pictures of him with the young women. Sure.

        4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          But wait, Pluggo, there's more!

          https://nypost.com/2024/01/02/news/document-dump-could-reveal-how-close-bill-clinton-was-to-epstein/

          The highly anticipated unsealing of a trove of court documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein could finally reveal the truth behind claims that Bill Clinton walked “into the night with a beautiful woman on each arm” while visiting the late sicko’s “Pedophile Island.”

          Alleged onetime Epstein teen “sex slave” Virginia Giuffre, now 40, has claimed that the former president visited Epstein’s Caribbean isle Little St. James — which was notoriously dubbed “Pedophile Island” by locals — sometime after Clinton left the Oval Office in 2001.

          “Strolling into the darkness with two beautiful girls around either arm, Bill seemed content to retire for the evening,” Giuffre wrote in a manuscript for a memoir cited by the Daily Mail.

          Epstein told Giuffre that Clinton was there because “he owes me a favor,” Giuffre said in a court deposition cited by the outlet.

          Giuffre’s claims that Clinton visited the island were later backed by former Clinton aide Doug Band in a 2020 Vanity Fair article. Band said Clinton visited Little St. James in January 2003 without the aide, according to the Mail.

          And let's not even get into Slick Willie's long and sordid history of sexual harassment and assault.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            All the assault allegations against Donald Trump, recapped
            Politics Updated on Jun 21, 2019 2:01 PM EST — Published on Oct 14, 2016 5:33 PM EST
            Sixteen women have come forward with allegations against President Donald Trump, each accusing him of inappropriate conduct. The most recent, from writer and columnist E. Jean Carroll, appeared in NY Magazine on Friday.
            .
            The women’s charges range from unwanted touches and aggressive, sudden kissing to the latest accusation against Trump — that he attacked a woman in a dressing room and forced his penis inside her. Donald Trump, his campaign and the Trump White House have insisted all of the stories are fabricated and politically motivated.

            https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/assault-allegations-donald-trump-recapped

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
              But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

            2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Trying for a "boaf sidez", Pluggo? Take the L, you've earned it.

            3. damikesc   1 year ago

              So, you still do not defend Dems at all costs, eh?

              Carroll's claims were insane. Trump "assaulted" her in a busy store, when he was famous, and nobody saw ANYTHING?

              Seriously?

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

                Jury even admitted she wasn’t raped yet some how found Trump civilly liable for saying he didn’t rape her.

                1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                  Hey, every leftist woman is entitled to her own reality, including compensation for imaginary crimes.

            4. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              Haha, your Democrat buddies are Epstein's biggest clients. But then, you're all pedos, so it's not surprising you're trying to deflect here, you hicklib cumstain.

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Believe her, but not her!

        5. R Mac   1 year ago

          No surprise you’re deflecting and defending for the actual pedophile shrike.

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        the late financier is alleged to have trafficked and sexually abused young women and girls

        Alleged? When they're dead they're just scumbag, rapist pedophiles.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago (edited)

      Per your article, Pluggo,

      During Maxwell’s 2021 trial, it was revealed that Trump had flown several times on Epstein’s jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” in the 1990s.

      Trump flew four times in 1993, as well as once in 1994, 1995 and 1997. The flights were between Palm Beach, Florida, and New York City airports, with one 1994 flight stopping at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

      In another June 1994 flight, Trump traveled with a woman named “Marla”—presumably then-wife Marla Maples—and his then-infant daughter, Tiffany, along with a nanny.

      Trump’s son Eric is also listed on a flight in August 1995 from Palm Beach to New York, and would have been 11 at the time of the flight.

      There is no evidence that Trump visited Epstein’s notorious Little St. James island, where the late financier is alleged to have trafficked and sexually abused young women and girls. Trump has also never been implicated in the offenses committed by Epstein or Maxwell.

      All in the 1990s, and nothing past 1997 for any Trump family member. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton flew numerous times to the island, and is even depicted wearing a blue dress in a painting Epstein had.

      Congratulations on exonerating Trump, Pluggo.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        He never reads his own links.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          I know. Pluggo makes it too easy some days.

          1. Chumby   1 year ago

            Pluggo don’t have time to read his own links. He’s too busy scrubbing the stains out of his clown suit.

    3. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        What else does your mother say about you?

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          Fuck off and die in a fire, asshole.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            Nice lady. Tell her I feel the same way about you.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              Fuck off and die in a fire, steaming pile of lefty shit.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Again, are your statements based on your own moral judgements or just ideological sniping?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            Given that he avoided both white knighting Pluggo and even participating in the main conversation, I'd say it's merely ideological sniping.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              Dunno. It's never a good idea to infer intent when abysmal stupidity will suffice. And in Sarc's case it's there in abundance

    4. ElvisIsReal   1 year ago

      Oh hey it's you. Just letting you know that everybody's glad you're gone from trolling the Substack!

  33. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

    .

    Child labor in the US was declining *before* it was banned by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

    Same thing applies to vehicle safety standards. Look at this graph and try to guess when the feds began regulating vehicle designs for safety.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago (edited)

      Huh. They changed the image! I’ll try to find the old one.

      ETA the problem with the linked graph is only showing deaths per capita, when what really counts is deaths per Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        Fuck wikipedia. I last looked at that chart just a few months ago. Showed US only, total accidents and deaths per year, per capita (which is useless), per Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and some others. It very clearly showed huge increases until 1910 or so, then continued but variable decreases, and zero changes correlated with federal safety regulations beginning in 1965 or so.

        This new chart is useless. Per capita? Says nothing useful except to provide excuses for more regulation. I'm surprised they didn't go whole hog and infuse it with wokery.

        They want donations? Stop doing this shit.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          At least we can use the chart. The first record is 1921 with 24.09 fatalities per 100 million VMT. It falls to 13.95 in 1932 before a few bumps in the 1930s and 1940s, but back down to 7.13 by 1949. From there, there's a steady decline to 1.08 by 2014 with a small bump in 2016. It rises in 2020 to 1.34 and seems to have plateaued there since (1.34-1.37). The regulations came into being in the 1960s while the rate was falling from the 5s to the 4s in the early 1970s.

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

            The original one I saw went back to 1900 or 1910, says my memory. This new one I found only goes to 1920.

        2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago (edited)

          Here’s a wikipedia chart which looks somewhat similar.

          https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/US_traffic_deaths_per_VMT%2C_VMT%2C_per_capita%2C_and_total_annual_deaths.png/1600px-US_traffic_deaths_per_VMT%2C_VMT%2C_per_capita%2C_and_total_annual_deaths.png

          It doesn’t look exactly the same, but it’s better than the trash that article shows now.

          It also starts around 1920, while the old one showed back to 1900 or 1910.

        3. damikesc   1 year ago

          I am astonished that Wikipedia made something impossible to actually research.

          They've earned their zero donations to date from me.

        4. Sevo   1 year ago

          "...They want donations? Stop doing this shit..."

          And sell ads.
          Please can the 'purity' bullshit; you're as biased as CNN.

        5. Zeb   1 year ago

          Never donate to the Wikimedia foundation (even if you like Wikipedia). They spend a lot of money on shit that has nothing to do with keeping Wikipedia online.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago (edited)

            ^ This (from a former donator)

          2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

            I wouldn't donate to Wikimedia foundation especially if it primarily supported Wikipedia. Wikipedia is dead to me. I don't care how many softball interviews Nick does with Jimmy Wales.

            1. Zeb   1 year ago

              I still like and use it for math and technical topics. And they have surprisingly good articles on guns and ammo topics.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                It’s also good for musicians/bands and discographies.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                  Wiki is fairly decent (but not perfect) for anything non-political. Once there's a political element to an article, or a person the resident lefties there love to hate, it's worthless.

                  1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                    That's what surprised me so much about this chart. It was vehicle safety, very informative. To hide it the way they did, they ad to change the redirection to a new article with a shorter revision log. I think it more likely due to incompetence than malice, but it still makes no sense.

          3. Chumby   1 year ago

            I donated to Wiggermedia, an encyclopedia website dedicated to documenting white rappers. Informer by Snow should be the Canadian anthem.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Look it up on an internet archive, it's bound to be on there.

        Some tranny janny changed that chart up because it didn't provide the manufactured consensus that they wanted.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

          Look it up on an internet archive, it’s bound to be on there.

          Doubtful. That's been captured too.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      For even more fun, look at timelines for poverty rates, especially for black Americans, and try to find the start of LBJ's Great Society and other big welfare programs.

      (Actually, you can see when the programs began, since the poverty rates stopped dropping and even increased.)

  34. Brandybuck   1 year ago

    > "I consider NFTs a good Rorschach test for whether an individual's mind is capable of moving out of 'the dismissive mode,'" writes Tyler Cowen

    I'm a fan of Tyler, but he's wrong here. The technology underneath NFTs is certainly valid, but NFTs themselves are indeed dismissible outside of a few corner cases. The technology is basically an indelible watermark, but people don't buy watermarks, they buy art. So if an NFT is worth anything it's due to its subjective artistic value, not its objective cryptographic strength.

    1. SRG2   1 year ago

      They're e-tulips.

    2. D-Pizzle   1 year ago

      Spacecash.

  35. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    Nothing at Harvard has actually changed.
    All the bullshit policies remain.
    The anti-semitic racist is still employed.
    No one has stated that anything she said or did (or copied) was wrong in any way.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      But at least it was fun watching uber-elite leftists snipe at each other.

  36. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    The 14th Amendment strategy—which bars those who have "engaged in insurrection" from holding federal office—has been used in several states and will likely be weighed by the Supreme Court.

    Here's an excellent article on the continuous use of DNC messaging by media corporations (Reason is guilty of this) regarding the 2020 election.

    Let's Stop Using the Words: 'Trump Tried to Overturn the 2020 Election'

    Excerpt:
    it is beyond time for the media to stop "reporting" that "Trump tried to overturn a presidential election" and to quit referring matter-of-factly: to "the election that Trump lost"; to "Trump's defeat" and his "baseless" "false claims"; and to "Trump is challenging the results" of "Biden's victory (in, say, Georgia)" and to "swing the election in his favor."

    It is equally time for news organizations to stop "reporting" that the four (who's counting?) indictments are nothing more than valid or understandable (if ill-timed) reactions to punish Trump for his ("criminal") attempts to "disenfranchise voters" and thus "subvert democracy."

    This is not a neutral, objective, and non-partisan view of of the facts of the 2020 election. Far from it. No. It is the (self-serving) DNC version. It is akin to asking "When did you stop beating your wife?"

    Phrases like “baseless fraud claims,” “sham election investigations,” and “false claims of election fraud” come straight from the Democrat party. At a minimum, readers and viewers are used to circumspect "allegedlys," to prudent "reportedlys," and to cautious "accused ofs". What happened to them?...

    ...The way that even conservative outlets like Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, not to mention RINOs like Mike Pence, buy into and repeat the Left's "talking points" and double standards is disconcerting. (A WSJ editorial defended Donald Trump against "lawfare" (to wield war on people through the legal system, by imprisoning them or "merely" ruining them, a tactic the Democrats have already used on such Trump allies as Gen. Michael Flynn and Rudy Giuliani) while calling his "post-election behavior" in 2020 "deceitful and destructive" and referring to his "disgraceful" "malfeasance." While National Review also pushed back against the Trump indictments, all the while feeling the need to point out that it "condemned Trump’s appalling actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election" as well as "Trump’s deceptions": "Mendacious rhetoric in seeking to retain political office is damnable.")

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Yep. If the other side is playing hockey, don't play golf at the blue line expecting not to be checked. Play hockey as well. Check them, elbow them, slam them into the boards so hard they flip over into the bench. Sure, you might get some time in the sin bin, but there are times it's well worth the 2 minutes.

      1. MK Ultra   1 year ago

        Paging Tom Wilson.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          How about Matt Petgrave?

    2. Zeb   1 year ago

      I don't even have particularly strong views about the validity of the 2020 election, but that shit has really bugged me too. It's just editorializing, particularly when they repeatedly state, as if it's an obvious fact, that Trump's take on the election is just "baseless" "lies". He was certainly wrong in some (but not all) of his claims. But that doesn't make it a lie.

      1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        At the same time, it's okay to condemn Trump's decision making. My long standing theory is that he was always planning on running again in 2024, so he was strategically using "Stolen election" as a theme for his campaign. Even if he believed there was evidence of fraud, he should have realized it wasn't going to be sufficient or emerge in time to affect the outcome.

        We can defend Trump's actions without having to endorse them.

        1. DesigNate   1 year ago

          Nope, we're all just conservative Trumpsuckers if we recognize any kind of nuance.

    3. Dillinger   1 year ago

      >>>(Reason is guilty of this)

      the January 6th super-duper-extra-galactic riot to end all riots was the worst assembly of humankind since the Great Flood

    4. mad.casual   1 year ago

      See above Re: Epstein.

      The guy's dead. Died in prison after being arrested. We've got multiple victims' testimony, photos, flight records, client lists, deeds, we've got his partner in crime, all of it can be indexed and cross referenced, it's not some sort of "He moved $10,001 to the Cayman Islands in a single payment." crime, and it's not like he was publicly notorious for dumping money into the Shriner's Childrens Hospital or anything similar otherwise and, still, "*alleged* financier and sex trafficker".

      It's like "alleged Gangster Al Capone", you're either being cheeky or retarded and considering that, unlike Capone, many of Epstein's victims and accomplices are still alive and free, it's not very cheeky.

  37. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    The white patriarchy is colonizing higher ed? The DEI brigade will have to woke harder!

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      '"I came to learn that the root cause of antisemitism at Harvard was an ideology that had been promulgated on campus, an oppressor/oppressed framework, that provided the intellectual bulwark behind the protests, helping to generate anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hate speech and harassment," wrote Ackman. But also: "The cost structure of the University is out of control due in large part to the fact that the administration has grown without bounds," he adds, and "the price of the product, a Harvard education, has risen at a rate well in excess of inflation for decades."'

      And Harvard-quality DEI costs big money.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        I find it hilarious that Ackman just now learned that "the root cause of antisemitism at Harvard was an ideology that had been promulgated on campus, an oppressor/oppressed framework." What rock has he been living under for the last 30+ years?

        1. D-Pizzle   1 year ago

          He's been living under Harvard's ATM.

  38. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    '"In one example that drew ridicule, Dr. Gay appeared to borrow exact phrases from the acknowledgments section of another author's book to thank her mentor and family in the acknowledgments section of her own dissertation." You truly cannot make this up.'

    'Many college students' brains went to woke mush a long time ago, so who cares that student groups LARPed as foreign policy experts for all of 15 minutes?'

    'With a new year comes legislators attempting, once again, to screw up your life. Here's a sampling of what fresh hell awaits.'

    I again want to commend New Liz. Her content skews more libertarian than most of what I see on Reason, and her tone is pleasantly snarky.

  39. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

    I guess it's somehow racist to hold black wahmyn to the same standards that huwite men are held to:

    Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism

    Also: "RethugliKKKunz pounce!"

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Again, think academic reparations.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Yeah, but she's keeping her staff position and her $875K salary. So don't cry for her.

  40. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    I'm old enough to remember three months ago when the Democrats were shrieking about white working class antisemitism. Jeff was breathlessly posting articles about how some Republican fundraiser had a intemperate Youtuber who criticized the ADL at his dinner party.

    Now as Democratic party auxiliaries reenact Kristalnacht across America, there's crickets about it from them.

    East Rutherford, NJ -a Jewish family of four, including a 12-year-old & a 16-year-old, faced verbal and physical assault at the American Dream Mall.

    The 16-year-old daughter, donning an IDF sweatshirt, endured offensive screams, such as "you're a whore, your mother is a whore, your grandmother is a whore." The aggressor, fueled by hostility, persisted in yelling "Free Palestine."

    Subsequently, the situation escalated as the assailant physically attacked the Jewish mother, as captured in the second video in the thread.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      But the attacker is totally not vermin.

  41. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago (edited)

    “the price of the product, a Harvard education, has risen at a rate well in excess of inflation for decades. its value”

    FIFU

  42. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    Harvard's Affirmative Action Hire

    Oooh, ouch. Someone at Reason is sharpening up her culture war knife, and I like where it's going.

    Liz, do you like me?

    [ ] Yes
    [ ] I'd rather not say in the comments
    [ ] I'll call you later
    [ ] All of the above

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      ^this is how not to pick up chicks.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Can't be any worse than Tinder.

      2. Dillinger   1 year ago

        worked in fourth grade.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          With the right intermediary.

      3. Chumby   1 year ago

        Simping ain’t easy

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          But somebody gotta do it.

        2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago (edited)

          But it’s necessary.

          Chasin’ Liz Wolfe like Tom chases… Jerry.

          1. Dillinger   1 year ago

            head-first into the wall every time. perfect analogy.

          2. Chumby   1 year ago

            Men don’t chase women.

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Dude, she's got a kid. Grow up, act like an adult, and sniff her hair when she's not looking.

  43. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Worth noting on the White House web site:

    What is “Indigenous Knowledge” And Why Does It Matter? Integrating Ancestral Wisdom and Approaches into Federal Decision-Making

    This is serious official bullshit. "Knowledge" justified as lore handed down from a bunch of naked people dancing around a fire is not the same as actual pre-COVID science. Claiming that both are equally valuable for answering scientific questions, and deriving subsequent policies, is way worse than anything Fauci and Friends ever did.

    And it helps me clarify why I now hate progressives. Once upon a time, I considered many on the left as allies in the battle to expel the Bible from science classes. But now they clearly want to replace that with their own religion. Have you noticed how liberals will shriek at the mere suggestion of Christian influence in public policy, but swoon over some indigenous shaman?

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Have you noticed how liberals will shriek at the mere suggestion of Christian influence in public policy, but swoon over some indigenous shaman?

      Yes, indeed. The Bible is a joke book, but "sacred narratives" should be honored.

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

        Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! - Isaiah 5:20-21

    2. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "Have you noticed how liberals will shriek at the mere suggestion of Christian influence in public policy, but swoon over some indigenous shaman?"

      Have I noticed that most atheists and other anti-religion people pretty much only focus on hating Christianity and leave most other religions alone? Yeah.

      1. NOYB2   1 year ago

        They don't even "hate Christianity", they hate American fundamentalist "Christianity", not understanding how fringe that is.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          And Catholicism as well, but that's only because they think they're in competition with them for who can sexually abuse the most kids.

          1. NOYB2   1 year ago

            Much as I despise the Catholic church, its rate of child abuse is no higher than that of the general population. That's too high for an organization that claims the moral high ground, but it is hardly a "competition".

      2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        I don't know who you all are talking about.

        For me and all other Atheists I interact with on other Forums, woo is woo whether it is prayer, exorcism, faith healing, male or female circumcision, anti-masturbation food and devices, sweat lodges, vision quests, Voodoo, "Psychic Surgery," or powdered rhino horns.

        It was rational, evidence-based, scientific medicine that got the human species from life expectancies from age 30 to age 83 and this is what will take it to multiple centuries and beyond. A Lazarus Long may be walking among us right now!

        Who knows? Maybe I'll be one. I've made it my New Year's Resolution to double-down on habits that made me lose weight and build strength on top of that, as well as participate in clinical trials and medical beta testing.

        Anything worth doing is worth doing as long as you can get away with it. And if eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty, somebody needs to man the watchtowers, grow eyes in the back of the head, and stay awake to do it.

        "Onward! Upward! Outward!"--Extropian and Transhumanist cheer.

        1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

          It was...scientific medicine that got the human species from life expectancies from age 30 to age 83...

          Improved sanitation and food safety, mostly the result of work by ordinary women, had a lot to do with that, too. Maybe more than medicine.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            Ordinary people did sanitation and food safety based upon the promptings of science, especially Louis Pasteur's Germ Theory of Disease.

            Before that--and even to some extent after and even to this day with some riff-raff--people threw garbage in the streets, bathed once a week, if that, and hung raw, uncovered, uncured meat in open outdoor markets.

            1. NOYB2   1 year ago

              Ordinary people did sanitation and food safety based upon the promptings of science, especially Louis Pasteur’s Germ Theory of Disease.

              You said that it was "scientific medicine" that cause life expectancy to increase, not "science" in general.

              Nor is there a contradiction between faith and science.

              For example, Louis Pasteur was a devout Catholic, as is clear from his numerous writings and letters.

              Historically, the vast majority of scientists were devout Christians.

        2. NOYB2   1 year ago

          It was rational, evidence-based, scientific medicine that got the human species from life expectancies from age 30 to age 83

          Almost all the gains in human life expectancy are due to better nutrition, lower violent deaths, and better public health.

          Medicine has added almost nothing to human life expectancy, and is likely going to be responsible for decreasing life expectancy in the future.

          and this is what will take it to multiple centuries and beyond. A Lazarus Long may be walking among us right now!

          That is both biologically and statistically impossible. Sorry. You are destined to die somewhere before age around 120, no matter what medicine does.

          For me and all other Atheists I interact with on other Forums, woo is woo whether it is prayer,

          Yet, your belief system is as irrational as that of Christians.

    3. NOYB2   1 year ago

      What is “Indigenous Knowledge” And Why Does It Matter? Integrating Ancestral Wisdom and Approaches into Federal Decision-Making

      Indigenous knowledge is the kind of crap Europeans believed before we became civilized.

      And it helps me clarify why I now hate progressives. Once upon a time, I considered many on the left as allies in the battle to expel the Bible from science classes.

      Ironically, mainstream Christianity is not hostile to science and does not believe in literal biblical truth. Such nonsense is reserved to fringe, mostly American, "Christian" churches.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        Ah, but "other ways of knowing" is what happens when you think science is just a collection of social clubs.

        And don't think European Christendom is out of the forest. It was just over 100 years ago that people went to barbers for treatment with leeches to balance the "Humours". (Candy-striped barber poles symbolize bloody rags used in the dangerous, barbaric procedure.)

        There are still Priests and Laity in the Catholic Church who believe in demon possession and practice exorcism and make trips to Lourdes for "healing waters" that are probably as toxic as the Ganges that Hindus tour to for healing.

        Among Evangelical and Charismatic Protestants, there are snake-handlers and Strychnine-drinkers and Raw Food cults with stores like Hallelujah Acres.

        Also, there's a brand of bread called Ezekiel 4:9 that takes up space in the freezers of the store where I work. Read the entire chapter and your appetite will go elsewhere.

        And it has to take up freezer space because it won't keep otherwise. Some idiot is going to leave Ezekiel 4:9 in their pantry at room temperature and it's going to give a bad case of Ergotism.

        And even when people in our society benefit from rational, evidence-based, scientific medicine, the first one they thank is not the Doctor or Nurse or the taxpayer who pays their Medicare or Medicaid...but God!

        Carl Sagan's book title says it best: The Demon-Haunted World.

        1. NOYB2   1 year ago

          Surgery became a fully recognized discipline in Europe in the 18th century.

          Evidence-based scientific medicine was developed mostly by devout Christians; the contradiction you see doesn't exist.

          Ezekiel 4:9 is a largely symbolic statement about the siege of Jerusalem; it also has nothing to do with Christianity.

          The fact that some Christians believe in superstitions is no more relevant than the fact that some atheists believe in witchcraft or UFOs.

          People like Carl Sagan have corrupted science just as much as medieval churches did, and largely for the same reasons: power and vanity.

    4. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      "Other ways of knowing"

      I'm starting to take the Reason stance and just sit on the sidelines on this one.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        But I can't. I still do scientific research and teach as an honorary professor. I see more of this "other ways of knowing" bullshit from my local college administration, national societies, and technical publishers. And I am not ready to surrender the hill of data and logic-based science to progressives, even if they tell us we need to turn STEM into STEAM. (If you have not seen that one, the A is for Arts.)

        1. SRG2   1 year ago

          Did you ever read Gross & Levitt's excellent book Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            Sounds interesting - I'll have to look into getting it. It's interesting that the warnings regarding postmodernism went up in the 1990s, but no one heeded them.

          2. Sevo   1 year ago

            Also "Fashionable Nonsense", Sokal/Bricmont.

        2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          Excellent! Keep up the good fight! Even if you have to do it from a Mad Scientist lair in an abandoned castle!

          Art is fine, but tell your charges that it still requires technical knowledge of which colors form which, which materials are the best medium for which art form, plus knowledge of computer sound-mixers, welding kits, 3D printing. Dremel Moto-Tools, and other tools for modern artists.

          And tell them to save the art for off-time, festivals, and the consignment shops. The hard and applied sciences keep you from being a starving artist!

    5. Zeb   1 year ago

      No, no. Christian Nationalists (whoever they fuck they are) are the real threat.

    6. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Leftists do adore their gnostics and wizards.

    7. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Once upon a time, I considered many on the left as allies in the battle to expel the Bible from science classes.

      Dude, you're almost as fucking old as Hank Phillips and Anthony Comstock.

      For the last almost half century, "the Bible in science classes" has consisted of "Maybe grinding up fetuses and buttfucking each other incessantly isn't the best idea." and having Anthony Fauci say "STFU, take your AZT, and get your COVID booster." in reply.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        Wrong you are, Rain Man Fart Breath.

        This story below in the archives of Reason pointed to where various members of the Religious Right were trying to mandate the teaching of "Creation Science" on equal par with Evolution in science classes of Gummint Skoolz.

        (If the link doesn't work, just put the title or author's name in the Reason search engine or cut and paste the URL in another Window.)

        The Facts Be Damned!
        The creationists claim to be scientific. But REASON's investigation exposes their subordination of truth to religious dogma.
        ROBERT STEINER | FROM THE DECEMBER 1981 ISSUE
        https://reason.com/1981/12/01/the-facts-be-damned/

        1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

          On the contrary, no such movement exists in the way you claim it does. An article from 43 years ago is not indicative of a mad.casual being a "Rain Man Fart Breath". That is still nearly a half-century ago. mad.casual is correct in his assessment.

          You're no better than Hank Phillips with your anti-Christian banter. Repent.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            Lol, I mostly skim past encog when he’s playing the religious bigot act, and didn’t notice he was citing an article from 1981.

            Totally “whoosh” worthy.

            1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

              Skimming and "whoosh"-ing doesn't make reality go away.

          2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            Well, it was more than what mad.casual said it was, not that Gummint Skoolz should take the stands he said either.

            And the Religious Right is still at in the Twenty-First Century with Ken Ham and his Noah's Ark replica and museum shitshow, which got subsidies from the local and Kentucky State taxpayers:

            Ken Ham’s Ark Park Floats On A Sea Of Taxpayer Subsidies
            Jul 31, 2019 Rob Boston
            https://www.au.org/the-latest/articles/ark-park-money/#

            And mad.casual is a Rain Man Fart Breath because he lives solely in his own head and not in a real world. And no, I won't repent from stating facts.

            1. NOYB2   1 year ago

              It's a religious not-for-profit that brings in lots of tourism.

              Whether what they teach is scientifically true is irrelevant to whether they should receive tax dollars.

        2. NOYB2   1 year ago

          What is taught in schools ought to be up to the local community. If the local community wants to teach "creation science" to their children using their local property tax dollars, they should be able to do that.

    8. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      Indigenous Knowledge

      Woah, woah, woah! What happened to the Science?

  44. Spinach Chin   1 year ago

    Is this one of the Good Reverend's Culture War Casualties?

    How are our betters fairing these days? 🙂

  45. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

    Seems the Babylon Bee is also glad ENB is gone from the roundup:

    January 9 - David French publishes revolutionary op-ed "The Conservative Case For Only Supporting Progressive Causes"

    https://babylonbee.com/news/the-babylon-bees-predictions-for-2024

    1. Dillinger   1 year ago

      beautiful.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      This is my favorite:

      July 9 - Camper full of meth with license plate HUNTER found on White House lawn, Secret Service unable to identify owner

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

        Although this is a good runner-up

        September 27 - Final kid in America becomes transgender, everyone begins detransitioning since now that's rebellious and cool

        1. Dillinger   1 year ago

          we move to empty Mexico is hilarious.

    3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      No, no, no, no, no, no, fuck, fuck, fuck no!

      May 8 - To raise campaign funds Chris Christie joins OnlyFans

      1. Ersatz   1 year ago

        this ....
        or this....
        this

    4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Babylon Bee also had a bit about "Tragic: Hamas Loses Two Leaders In One Day"

      Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Ha!

  46. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>saying Gay merely used "inadequate citations,"

    inadequate citations failed papers in every class I ever took.

    1. R Mac   1 year ago

      Yeah but are you a bipoc? Checkmate bitch!

  47. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>"I consider NFTs a good Rorschach test for whether an individual's mind is capable of moving out of 'the dismissive mode,'"

    also a test on whether the guy standing in front of you is an idiot.

  48. NOYB2   1 year ago

    Reason, please stick to the style guide you have received.

    It isn't "inadequate citations" (which would associate "inadequacy" with this strong, black woman, an unacceptable association), it is "duplicative language".

  49. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    If the CCP wants more babies they should sponsor more local NBA franchises (and NCAA D1 college teams).

  50. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >> California will start mandating that large retailers set aside some toy aisles as gender-neutral.

    figure skates?

    1. Zeb   1 year ago

      Just declare all aisles gender neutral. Then if anyone complains just call them sexist and something-phobic for thinking boys can't play with dolls or princess shit.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        TOYS - this aisle.

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

        Again, the California ideological political machine is accidentally being transphobic by their own rules. It was like Ketanji Brown Jackson saying that she couldn't define a woman because she wasn't a biologist. She was trying to walk the trans-sympathetic line, but inadvertently made a transphobic response.

  51. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    In New York, private schools are now required to offer menstrual products, free of charge, in bathrooms. (I wonder if they'll be offered in men's bathrooms too, as YOU NEVER KNOW who may be menstruating, or so they tell me).

    It warms my heart to see some at Reason no longer sitting on the sidelines.

  52. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago (edited)

    Harvard president’s resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism

    Calling out and proving the falsity of academia: The New Conservative Weapon.

    Every day, I get a little conservative-er.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      I will say the ratio on the tweet is pretty sweet.

      Community notes kicked the APs ass, and a cool meme was also posted:

      "the best time to delete this tweet was immediately after sending it. The second best time is now."

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

      And when the Hodge Twins weigh in...

    3. Minadin   1 year ago

      I am really enjoying the Community Notes feature. Democratized fact-checking against the establishment gatekeepers.

      1. DesigNate   1 year ago

        Ugh, figures y'all would support misinformation. /s

  53. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    "All protected speech, sure, but all stunning given the college campus..."

    I think Liz meant "..., to be sure,..."?

  54. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

    The Harvard president plagiarism discourse is so weird because, like, this is obviously plagiarism but the whole scandal is so politically coded that the dude who was plagiarized is like “no biggie”

    I love it when the people I make fun of, actually talk in the way I make fun of them with.

  55. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

    Here is a comment on another post.

    https://reason.com/2024/01/02/claudine-gay-harvard-resigns-plagiarism-free-speech/?comments=true#comment-10381113

    "I think Gay’s abysmal record on free speech is what, indirectly, did her in. If Harvard had a sterling record on free speech, she could plausibly fall back on that in defense of their tolerance for pro-Hamas rhetoric. “We allow free speech. Period” is a pretty compelling standard. Her problem is everyone is fully aware that Harvard, under Claudine Gay, doesn’t allow free speech, period. Everyone is fully aware that all the woke caveats and exceptions to free speech are fully in effect at Harvard. And everyone fully understands that, the moment this particular kerfuffle died down, Gay would be right back to combatting microaggressions. Gay was done in by the very standards Harvard has championed."- Bill daLasio

  56. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

    "New conservative weapon just dropped: plagiarism"

    Bwahahahahaaaa! Death toll from plagiarism has doubled year over year! University presidents and wymyn of colour particularly vulnerable!

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      We need to ban these conservative assault weapons. High capacity plagiarism checking kills children.

  57. John C. Randolph   1 year ago

    To nobody's surprise, notorious Jew-hating scumbag Al Sharpton has been making noises about staging a protest in support of Harvard's disastrous diversity hire.

    In 1991, Sharpton incited a race riot resulting in the murder of an Australian Jewish PhD candidate in Brooklyn.

    -jcr

    1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      #ResistWeMuchIsraeliSelfDefenseAndOriginalityInAcademia
      🙂
      😉

    2. D-Pizzle   1 year ago

      I'm sure Sharpton is a major Harvard donor.

  58. Roberta   1 year ago

    "In one example that drew ridicule, Dr. Gay appeared to borrow exact phrases from the acknowledgments section of another author's book to thank her mentor and family in the acknowledgments section of her own dissertation."

    But that's...just silly! Acknowledgments are so much fluff, like greeting cards. Silly that someone would copy them, but also silly that anyone would complain. If that's supposed to be the worst of the plagiarism, then the whole issue must be nothing.

    1. Roberta   1 year ago

      It's like Nelson Rockefeller's BOMFOG boilerplate: "brotherhood of man,...fatherhood of God".

      1. Chumby   1 year ago

        Nelson died due to a heart attack that rumors report began while he was making love to his 25-year old aide. New York magazine reported, “Nelson thought he was coming, but he was going.”

  59. Roberta   1 year ago

    I taught college courses for years and saw loads of plagiarism. Trust me, from the examples given here, this is not plagiarism.

    1. NOYB2   1 year ago

      You are evidently another example of the rot that permeates academia.

      But, plagiarism aside, Gay's publications were academically worthless drivel as well.

  60. XM   1 year ago

    "Harvard's Affirmative Action Hire Gets the Boot."

    How did this level of honestly get past Reason's editors?

    1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      Yes, seeing the AA word was startling.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!