Houthis Ruin Christmas
Plus: The fertility crisis, the origins of Israel, El Segundo's tech scene, and more...

You've heard of the Grinch, but what about the Houthis? Yemeni Houthis, who are backed by Iran, have been targeting massive ships in the Red Sea with drones and missiles since the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel. Now, a bunch of shipping companies like Maersk—which had a ship attacked by Houthis last week—are avoiding the Suez Canal and diverting their ships around Africa via the Cape of Good Hope.
"Following the near-miss incident involving Maersk Gibraltar" last Thursday "and yet another attack on a container vessel" one day later, "we have instructed all Maersk vessels in the area bound to pass through the Bab al-Mandab Strait to pause their journey until further notice," reads a press release from the company.
"As Israel ramped up its retaliation for the attack, the Houthis began targeting ships that it accused of in some way support Israel's war effort," reports CNN, "though multiple companies that have been targeted have said they have no connection with Israel or the war."
The Houthis have launched more than 100 attacks on a dozen commercial vessels over the last month. This hasn't happened at this scale in more than two decades, an American military official told CNN. Now, the Pentagon is assembling a security initiative alongside allied countries to attempt to secure the trade routes.
"About 50 vessels go through the Suez Canal a day, and recent data suggested that, as of Monday, at least 32 had been diverted, said Chris Rogers, head of supply chain research at S&P Global Market Intelligence," per The New York Times. Another analyst called the situation "a slow-burning disaster." In other words: Houthis are threatening the supply chain in a major way—roughly 12 percent of global shipping traffic goes through the Suez Canal—and, well, if your Christmas packages don't get here in time, it's possibly the Houthi militants' fault.
The oil angle: Because of this unfolding crisis, BP has stopped sending ships through the Red Sea. But rerouting oil tankers will impose additional costs likely to have ripple effects. "Brent crude, the international oil benchmark, has risen about 8 percent since mid-December, to above $79 a barrel," reports The New York Times. "But the move has only partly reversed a monthslong slide in the price of oil, which hovered above $90 a barrel in September and early October."
The Red Sea disruption is an especially big problem right now because both Russian sanctions and the war in Ukraine mean Europe depends on Middle Eastern and Asian oil to a greater degree than in years prior. Bypassing the Suez Canal and going around the Cape of Good Hope tends to raise crude oil prices by nearly $4 a barrel, Goldman Sachs analysts predict.
In some ways, pandemic supply chain snarls—and their quick resolutions—have taught us that supply chains are more resilient than we had once feared. But in other ways—American reliance on Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturing, for one, which could all go to shit if China at some point tries to seize Taiwan—we've found ourselves vulnerable. This bizarre situation playing out in the Red Sea might not drive oil and gas prices up too drastically, all on its own, but when piled on to the pain Americans are feeling from sky-high inflation, it's surely unwelcome.
Colorado screws us all saves democracy: Colorado's Supreme Court ruled late last night that Donald Trump is not eligible to seek the presidency under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits those who have engaged "in insurrection or rebellion against" the government from holding office, which means his name will be removed from the state's Republican primary ballot.
The "provision [was] originally intended to restrain former Confederates from seeking office after the Civil War," writes Reason's Eric Boehm. But late last night, "in a 4–3 ruling, the Colorado high court determined that Trump's role in instigating the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol was sufficient to bar him from the presidency." Note that Trump has been convicted of no insurrection-related crimes.
The ruling will probably be appealed to the Supreme Court but, in short, the outcome probably won't be pretty.
The opinion of the Colorado Supreme Court is shameful and runs completely counter to our constitutional system.
Donald Trump was not removed from office by Congress for engaging in insurrection.
Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted in a court of law of engaging in…
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) December 20, 2023
Just finished reading the Colorado Supreme Court ruling, and I wholly concur with Justin's view. The opinion is wrongheaded in the main and sloppy in specifics. The Supreme Court will undoubtedly overturn, but the damage from this corrosive folly will linger. (1/4) https://t.co/ZJ9tlD8xQL
— Peter Meijer (@RepMeijer) December 20, 2023
I continue to believe that Trump's liability for January 6th is political, and efforts to bend the law and loosen interpretations to force accountability into the legal realm will be more damaging in the long-term than whatever his opponents think they are preventing. (4/4)
— Peter Meijer (@RepMeijer) December 20, 2023
Scenes from New York:
Eric Adams gives the worst answer any politician has ever given to a soft ball question. pic.twitter.com/sYL3cj5yCf
— Tim Miller (@Timodc) December 18, 2023
"New York… This is a place where every day you wake up, you could experience everything from a plane crashing into our Trade Center to a person who's celebrating a new business that's opening. This is a very, very complicated city and that's why it's the greatest city on the globe."
QUICK HITS
- This is beautiful and insightful, on the joy of having children as well as how we ought to look at the current fertility crisis, by Alex Nowrasteh in Quillette.
- A paper company in Guangdong, China, is saying that "employees need to clock 62 miles every month if they want to get an annual bonus worth 130% of their monthly salary," and that they will be eligible for "an annual bonus equivalent to a month's salary if they ran 31 miles every month."
- New episode of EconTalk from Russ Roberts (who was recently a Just Asking Questions guest, back before the rebrand) and Haviv Rettig Gur on the origins of Israel and the conflict in the Middle East.
- More tax trouble for members of the Biden family, who can't seem to figure out how to pay the IRS what they owe.
- Unacceptable bullying from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.):
Coin Center received the same impertinent letter from Elizabeth Warren as the BA and Coinbase. Read it for yourself to see what a bullying publicity stunt it is. pic.twitter.com/YF3SFQ8rqh
— Jerry Brito (@jerrybrito) December 19, 2023
- Minnesota Timberwolves player Anthony Edwards made headlines this week because he allegedly wired a model $100,000 to pay for her abortion and sent texts that made clear what he wanted her to do. "Hell Nawl can't do dis," say the texts, as well as the oh-so-eloquent "get an abortion lol." After these texts were made public by the New York Post, he released a statement: "I made comments in the heat of a moment that are not me, and that are not aligned with what I believe and who I want to be as a man. All women should be supported and empowered to make their own decisions about their bodies and what is best for them." You see, one is supposed to use the verbiage of the second statement, not the first, in polite society. (The actual morality of the baby-aborting doesn't seem widely disputed in this case, just the way he talked about it.)
- Yes:
I hear this often: "There's no way that the work of a CEO is worth 300x that of their average employee."
But this isn't the sort of thing you can know from the armchair. It's like asserting that there's no way that a gram of plutonium is worth 3,000x a cup of coffee. https://t.co/qTWkrwYktT
— Chris Freiman (@cafreiman) December 19, 2023
- "Today, the lifeblood of Southern California's tech scene is charged by an unapologetically optimistic pack of engineers, machinists, and entrepreneurs building at the frontier of atoms-based technology," writes Founders Fund's Scott Nolan for Pirate Wires on El Segundo's tech scene.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...who are backed by Iran...
Well that's out of left field.
You know who else hates Christmas?
The Hessian forces garrisoned at Trenton, NJ?
Nice.
The Puritans? Jehovah's Witnesses? Seventh-Day Adventists?
The White Witch?
You know who else hates Trumpsmas?
The Bider-Grunch! AND the Lizard People!
The Bider-Grunch has stolen Trumpsmas!!! Get a grip, people, and focus on the BIGLY problems around here!!! Man the battle stations, full speed ahead, and DAMN the Lizard People AND their mind-controlled vote thieves and erection thieves!!!
How the Bider-Grunch Stole Trumpsmas
‘Twas the night before Trumpsmas,
And all through the lands,
Patriotic feelings were stirring our glands!
The voters ALL firmly fixed to vote RED!
Vote BLUE?!? They’d rather be dead!
Visions of Eternal Redness danced in their heads!
The Great Whitish-Orangish Pumpin-Father would soon be there!
All one-party Republican states would soon be square!
While every You Down in Youville Liked Trumpsmas a lot...
But the Bider-Grunch, who lived just north of Youville, Did NOT!
The Bider-Grunch hated Trumpsmas! The whole Trumpsmas season!
Now, please don't ask why. No one quite knows the reason.
It could be his head wasn't screwed on just right.
It could be, perhaps, that his shoes were too tight.
But I think that the most likely reason of all,
May have been that his heart was two sizes too small.
Whatever the reason, His heart or his shoes,
He stood there on Trumpsmas Eve, hating the Yous,
Staring down from his cave with a sour, Grunchy frown,
At the warm lighted windows below in their town.
For he knew every You would vote Trump,
THIS, bigly, made the Grunch a real grump!.
"And they're preparing ballots!" he snarled with a sneer,
"Tomorrow is Trumpsmas! It's practically here!"
Then he growled, with his Grunch fingers nervously drumming,
"I MUST find some way to stop Trumpsmas from coming!"
For Tomorrow, he knew, all the You girls and boys,
Would wake bright and early. They'd rush for their toys!
And then! Oh, the noise! Oh, the Noise!
Noise! Noise! Noise!
That's one thing he hated! The NOISE!
NOISE! NOISE! NOISE!
Then the Yous, young and old, would sit down to a feast.
And they'd feast! And they'd feast! And they'd FEAST!
FEAST! FEAST! FEAST!
They would feast on You-pudding, and rare You-roast beast.
Which was something the Bider-Grunch couldn't stand in the least!
And THEN They'd do something He liked least of all!
Every You down in Youville, the tall and the small,
Would stand close together, with Trumpsmas bells ringing.
They'd stand hand-in-hand. And the Yous would start singing!
They'd sing! And they'd sing! And they'd SING!
SING! SING! SING!
And the more the Grunch thought of this You TrumpsmasSing,
The more the Grunch thought, "I must stop this whole thing!"
"Why, for four years I've put up with it now!"
"I MUST stop this Trumpsmas from coming! But HOW?"
Then he got an idea! An awful idea!
THE GRUNCH GOT A WONDERFUL, AWFUL IDEA!
"I know just what to do!" The Bider-Grunch laughed in his throat.
And he made a quick MAGA hat and a coat.
And he chuckled, and clucked, "What a great Grunchy trick!"
"With this coat and this hat, I look just like Saint Prick!"
"All I need is a Proud Boy..." The Bider-Grunch looked around.
But, since Proud Boys are scarce, there was none to be found.
Did that stop the old Grunch? No! The Grunch simply said,
"If I can't find a Proud Boy, I'll make one instead!"
So he called his cat, Chairman Meow. Then he took some red thread,
And he tied a big MAGA hat on the top of his head.
Then he loaded many bags and sacks, made ‘em all fit somehow,
On a ramshackle sleigh, and he hitched up Chairman Meow..
Then the Grunch said, "Giddap!" And the sleigh started down,
Toward the homes where the Whos Lay asnooze in their town.
All their windows were dark. Quiet snow filled the air.
All the Whos were all dreaming sweet dreams without care.
When he came to the first little house on the square.
"This is stop number one," the Grunchy fake-Trump hissed,
And he climbed to the roof, empty bags in his fist.
Then he slid down the chimney. To his fat gut, a punch.
But, if Trump could do it, then so could the Grunch.
He got stuck only once, for a moment or two.
Then he stuck his head out of the fireplace flue.
Where the little You ballots all hung in a row.
"These ballots," he grinned, "are the first things to go!"
Then he slithered and slunk, with a smile most unpleasant,
Around the whole room, and he took every vote!
This, surely, would get the You’s goat!
And he stuffed them in bags. Then the Grunch, very nimbly,
Stuffed all the bags, one by one, up the chimney!
Then he slunk to the icebox. He took the Yous' feast!
He took the You-pudding! He took the roast beast!
He cleaned out that icebox as quick as a flash.
Why, that Grunch even took their last can of You-hash!
Then he stuffed all the food up the chimney with glee.
"And NOW!" grinned the Bider-Grunch, "I will stuff up the tree!"
And the Bider-Grunch grabbed the tree, and he started to shove,
When he heard a small sound like the coo of a dove.
He turned around fast, and he saw a small You!
Little Cindy-Lou You, who was not more than two.
The Grunch had been caught by this tiny You daughter,
Who'd got out of bed for a cup of cold water.
She stared at the Grunch and said, "Lord Trump, why,”
"Why are you taking our Trumpsmas tree? WHY?"
But, you know, that old Grunch was so smart and so slick,
He thought up a lie, and he thought it up quick!
"Why, my sweet little tot," the fake Lord Trump lied,
"There's a light on this tree that won't light on one side."
"So I'm taking it home to my workshop, my dear."
"I'll fix it up there. Then I'll bring it back here."
And his fib fooled the child. Then he patted her head,
And he got her a drink and he sent her to bed.
And when CindyLou You went to bed with her cup,
He went to the chimney and stuffed the tree up!
Then the last thing he took Was the log for their fire!
Then he went up the chimney, himself, the old liar.
On their walls he left nothing but hooks and some wire.
And the one speck of food That he left in the house,
Was a crumb that was even too small for a mouse.
Then He did the same thing To the other Yous' houses
Leaving crumbs much too small For the other Yous' mouses!
It was quarter past dawn... All the Yous, still a-bed,
All the Yous, still asnooze When he packed up his sled,
Packed it up with all of their ballots… ALL of their votes!
THIS, the fake Lord Trump grumped, will get ALL of their goats!
Three thousand feet up! Up the side of Mt. Crumpit,
He rode with his load to the tiptop to dump it!
"Pooh-Pooh to the Yous!" he was Grunchishly humming.
"They're finding out now that no Trumpsmas is coming!"
"They're just waking up! I know just what they'll do!"
"Their mouths will hang open a minute or two,
Then the Yous down in Youville will all cry Boo-Hoo!"
"That's a noise," grinned the Bider-Grunch, "That I simply MUST hear!"
So he paused. And the Bider-Grunch put his hand to his ear.
And he did hear a sound rising over the snow.
It started in low. Then it started to grow.
But the sound wasn't sad! Why, this sound sounded merry!
It couldn't be so! But it WAS merry! VERY!
He stared down at Youville! The Grunch popped his eyes!
Then he shook! What he saw was a shocking surprise!
Every You down in Youville, the tall and the small,
Was singing! Without any Trump-votes at all!
He HADN'T stopped Trumpsmas from coming! IT CAME!
Somehow or other, it came just the same!
And the Grunch, with his Grunch-feet ice-cold in the snow,
Stood puzzling and puzzling: "How could it be so?"
The Grunch-light came on! “Yes! Now I know!
The Yous down in Youville, they’re really quite slow!
Their erection’s been stolen, but the whole Trumpsmas glow,
Overwhelms EVERYTHING, even democracy!
They’ll lie bigly, and impose mobocracy!”
So the Bider-Grunch whipped out his cell phone,
Called the Lizard People, who send out a drone,
Mind-controlled them ALL, as is Lizard habit,
Now NO ONE could save them, not even Saint Babbitt!
So THAT’s the Sad Story of the bad Bider-Grunch,
Who stole Trumpsmas, the erections, AND your lunch!
For those that haven't muted him, the spam flag will save your scrolling finger. Reason doesn't pay attention to it, so using it won't hurt him or you, but it will override his heckler's veto and make the thread readable.
I muted the squirrel sometime ago after the constant spamming of section 230 and Humpty Dumpty Trumpty crap. Say, have you asked him about Stormy Daniels?
That must've taken you all of a very long 50 seconds to cpoy and paste from somewhere, NaziSqrlsy.
Back on mute shiteater. And fuck off sarc.
People with short gold, frankincense and myrrh contracts on the Babylon Commodities Exchange
Now that's clever!
🙂
😉
"As Israel ramped up its retaliation for the attack, the Houthis began targeting ships that it accused of in some way support Israel's war effort," reports CNN, "though multiple companies that have been targeted have said they have no connection with Israel or the war."
Obviously, the Gaza-Israeli War is just one theater of the larger global Jihad of Dar Al-Islam ("The House of Islam") versus Dar Al-Harb ("The House of War" i.e. anyone who isn't under the submission which is Islam.)
There is no getting out of this by BDS against Israel or shilling for the Palestinians or even if Israel were pushed into the sea or the world were somehow rendered Jüdenrein.
Let's hope this will end with every mosque turned into a skating rink or a dance hall instead of offices for Century 21 Caliphate.
Obligatory link that sums up our predicament, except that the "worlds" at stake are each of our individual lives and the "evil" that must confront today's Necromongers is what they hold as "evil" I.e. Rational, Sovereign, Individualism.
The Chronicles of Riddick (Unrated)--Trailer
https://youtu.be/Vm9aNwTBJ2c?si=ckbpTt0t7QlEAgJA
Here is a poem about Gaza.
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.israel/c/9r3guA2dKjE/m/Yh8AssMiAQAJ
Oh, Hamas attacked the Jews,
And now they are learning bad news,
Many of Hamas are dead,
And their women like to give dirty head,
Oh, what can I say about Hamas,
Satan the devil is their boss,
I really don’t know what to say,
Many in Hamas are gay,
They attacked Kibbutz Aza with their might,
Now they a learning the Jews know how to fight.
Hamas murdered little children that they hate,
Hamas has a big fat puss gut woman for a mate.
Soon Hamas will be all done,
As Tzhal kills each and every one.
As I mentioned elsewhere, this must be a song on the Palestinian State TV version of South Park, sang by a Jewish (((Al-Cartmann))) who hates Al-Kyle because; "He's a Goy!"
🙂
😉
Kyle's mom?
Dreidel dreidel dreidel, I made you out of clay, Dreidel dreidel dreidel, with you I will play.
BWA-BWA-BWAAAAAT?!?!?!?
🙂
😉
Well, she is a bitch, and she has stupid hair.
I'd like to point out that two years ago, we were supposed to be upset that Saudi Arabia was paying us to bomb these assholes.
Well, let the Saudis and Houthis bomb each other without our help, while we pay-per-view it next to some cozy gas logs fueled by our own petroleum-derived propane.
🙂
😉
NYT complains about conservative children's cartoons that have a dad active in the family life.
https://scnr.com/article/jeremy-boreing-criticizes-nyt-article-discussing-fantasy-of-weirdly-present-fathers-in-bluey-chip-chilla_2d54c98b9ebd11ee9c930242ac1c0002
Well, men are icky and the two-parent family is a white privilege racist construct (as the Smithsonian told us).
"Duh culture war is all on the right and stuff..."
Funny how you complain about so-called indoctrination in schools yet you defend explicit right-wing indoctrination in the form of kids' programming.
Most households in America have a father present. To say otherwise is simply bullshit.
"A fAtHeR cO-pAreNTinG iS riGhT-wiNG iNd0cTriNaTioN"
Fortunately you can't become a dad from where Jeff likes to stick it.
In prepubescent boys?
Not if your black
HEY, THAT IS JUST THEIR CULTURAL HERITAGE AND EVEN IF IT SUCKS FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED EXCEPT THE GANG- (AND BITCH-)BANGING STUD THEN IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS BUT YOU STILL OWE REPARATIONS!
Are people required to fund the kid's programming with their tax dollars, and required to watch the shows? The same way they are required to fund the govt schools, and their kids are required to attend?
At this point Lying Jeffy isn’t putting any thought whatsoever into attacking Jesse’s links. It’s basically a Tourette’s like reaction.
Standard family structure is indoctrination?
Lol. God damn youre retarded jeff. Yeap. Bookmark.
How dare someone have a positive dad as a character in a children's show.
Fuck me, Jeffy, can you be anymore retarded? How the fuck is having a positive father character in a children's TV show indoctrination?
Yes, yes he can. Just wait, you'll see. Possibly even today.
I've a feeling we have another "Snow White" incident on the way from him.
That approaches the bears in trunks take.
He must have absolutely seethed at 80s sitcom programming.
chemtard hates it when fathers are present in their children's lives.
Fatherless children are easier to groom.
He’ll be that boy’s daddy.
HONK HONK!
Come on, dude, that's just silly. The problem and complaint is that schools are doing it regardless of parents' wishes. No one is saying that parent's shouldn't instill their preferred values and worldview in their own children. You can call that indoctrination if you want to.
I am referring to the BentKey network, which is explicitly right-wing and that is what is hosting the programming.
A right wing network? The horror!
Yes, and parents are free to choose to have their kids watch it, or not. So what's the problem? It's not like there is a lack of choices in educational entertainment for children.
That’s uh, definitely a take.
yeah... except if you actually read the article, thats a very misleading summary.
It's not "blarg arg, cartoons shouldn't feature dads because they suck" It doesn't actually have a point that's easy to boil down to a headline. It's more generally about how the dad's feature prominently in the cartoon, it's a mostly positive evolution from the portrayal of dads in tv in the past as couch potatoes, but how the ultra engaged dad serves as a surrogate fantasy for parents who would like to but can't practically be that involved. You just have some conservative claiming its a super woke article bashing dads and assume its true without actually reading it. There has clearly been plenty of ultra woke stuff published in the Times, but this isn't it.
Mexico claims to have standing to sue over Texas state law.
https://scnr.com/article/mexico-to-challenge-texas-new-illegal-entry-law_0fd894079e9611ee9c930242ac1c0002
Just the next step in nullifying our border.
Umm, according to your own article, Mexico's president never claimed to have legal standing to sue anyone in US court. He said he would "challenge" the law. "Challenge" could mean many things, not necessarily file a lawsuit in court.
Why are you lying about the content of your own article?
So like... pistols at dawn?
Lolwut.
Have you gotten even dumber?
"He said he would “challenge” the law. “Challenge” could mean many things, not necessarily file a lawsuit in court."
Looks like Jeff decided he's going to gift us a whole bunch of new Jeff quotes five days early.
"Well, he didn't say *exactly those specific words*!!11111!!!111!!!"
Now you're ignoring terms that have clear and precise definitions when you want?
'Challenging' a law means challenging it in court. It always has.
Because anything else isn't challenging the law - its whining about it.
He’s been doing that for awhile.
At this point it seems like it’s just a visceral reaction to anything Jesse posts.
Yep.
"Challenge" means "challenge".
What it means to challenge a law is different for heads of state than it is for ordinary citizens.
It is not hard to imagine a head of state "challenging" a law through diplomatic avenues that are not available to ordinary citizens.
So no, "challenge" does not necessarily mean "go to court" in every single case, and especially when the person speaking is a head of state.
Will that hearing be in a Texas court?
Now, a bunch of shipping companies like Maersk—which had a ship attacked by Houthis last week—are avoiding the Suez Canal and diverting their ships around Africa via the Cape of Good Hope.
Is the world ready to look past commerce disruptions? Was the 'rona training us for this???
In some ways, pandemic supply chain snarls—and their quick resolutions—have taught us...
I KNEW IT
Nobody needs stuff from 23 kinds of countries.
Breadlines are a good thing.
Fatties waiting in food lines would need a bench and perhaps would call Pizza Hut to deliver.
I guess they think Pizza Hut gets it's pizza crust from love, good looks and good taste. /Sarc
🙂
😉
(Nearly 40 years ago in college, I wouldn't have said that. Pizza Hut and Pizza Inn were Da Bomb when you couldn't get Godfather's. Now they're all a distant memory.)
Either love or government mandates.
True enough. ADA accommodations don't make the wheat sprout.
That's how we know when they have bread!
Isn't Biden still blaming supply chains for all his economic problems?
Liz Warren (D) is blaming the 2% grocery store profits for high food prices.
To be fair, when she was growing up they'd just go out and hunt down a buffalo, so she doesn't know how the white men's stores work.
A buffalo, or a buffauxlo?
Bison
Tatanka
That and people who don't put their masks back on between bites at restaurants...
oops, that's Gavin Newsom.
https://twitter.com/witte_sergei/status/1737230663085109347?t=2pgwRUS368Z4JDmzjqZ9Hw&s=19
Democracy is residents of cities voting to literally release wolves into rural areas against the objections of the people who live there.
[Link]
The feds did this to rural Idaho in the 90's. Apply the 3S criterion.
Shoot, Shovel, and Shut-Up?
🙂
😉
Alas, that might not work anymore. Cities that no longer fight crimes of humans against humans would re-tool their CSI labs to finding killers of endangered species.
That was alluded to in an episode of Yellowstone when a cast member shot a Grizzly Bear and the Sheriff said 10,000 Vegans would be writing letters to the Park Service if this got out.
Wolves are no longer on the Endangered Species List. I can legally take 10 wolves per year with my trapping endorsement. There's no season on private property and a 6 month season on public property.
Idaho never forgave the Feds for dumping them here after a century absence.
Well, that's good to know at least.
Here in North Carolina, we get coyotes on the walking trails and greenways, but authorities may frown on packing to defend against them, since some of these vistas are in City Limits and there may be local restrictions.
Well, if you're trapping them, I hear Boulder, CO wants them released near their schools.
FYI - Wolves do not survive snares.
I don't know about Idaho, but outside of ranchers, the re-introduction of wolves in Yellowstone and Western MT around that time had a decent amount on local public support. It did make the local white-tail population (probably mule deer as well) more manageable, which probably actually got a number of farmers on board after it was done if not before
Democracy is our betters telling us what to do, with a fig leaf of popular voting.
As for the retarded Colorado wolf scheme, I demand that democracy and equality require wolf distributions proportional to county populations. So a handful of wolves in a rural western slope county must be balanced by at least a thousand wolves in Boulder county.
Round them up and drop them off in the cities that voted for this.
The elitists or the wolves? Perhaps both?
Yes. Together. In the same arena.
🙂
😉
Well, I had meant the wolves. Just right in the middle of downtown.
I guess these idiots never saw Wolfen
https://youtu.be/L46RneepoxQ?si=xNxlg6uzS14wDAMj
Why are you complaining? Wolves figured highly in Nazi iconography.
Trump Kept Hitler Speeches ‘In a Cabinet By His Bed,’ Said Ex-Wife Ivana Trump in Resurfaced Interview
Jamie FreveleDec 18th, 2023, 10:17 am
https://www.mediaite.com/trump/ivana-trump-revealed-in-1990-vanity-fair-interview-that-her-ex-kept-hitler-speeches-in-a-cabinet-by-his-bed/
Fatass Donnie loves his dictators - see Putin and Lil' Kim.
You love kiddie porn.
It is amusing watch shrike and sarc run around saying trump is Hitler while ignoring the massive calla for genocide from the left. Almost like it is a political issue for them. Also funny they ramp up the claims the same time the DNC and the left ramp it up. But don't call them democrats.
ignoring the massive calla for genocide from the left
You mean Rashida Tlaib and the idiot Pro-Palestine college students. Fuck them all. Expel Tlaib from Congress. I am not ignoring a damn thing you moron.
You left some people out.
Shrike's Democratic party pals have spent the last month reenacting Kristallnacht across America, killing Jews for being Jews and attacking their businesses. The worst antisemitic actions ever in American history and all perpetrated by Democrats and egged on by Democratic Party representatives in the House.
But the lying fuck wants us to believe that the guy with the Jewish family, who arranged the Abraham Accords and moved the embassy to Jerusalem, is a Nazi because Marty Davis from Paramount who gave him a copy of Hitler's speeches.
Beyond retarded.
https://twitter.com/FrankDeScushin/status/1737515931184615682?t=RmrowfDygFRG67T2fr7UOA&s=19
A recent poll showed Americans think hate crimes against Jews, Blacks, Muslims, and Arabs are a serious problem, but hate crimes against Christians and Whites aren't. Are hate crimes against those last two groups less serious or have Americans been trained it's OK to hate them?
[Links]
https://twitter.com/FrankDeScushin/status/1718403898321391699?t=ird0Go5errZcjKdv7o7Fcw&s=19
2022 FBI hate crime stats show:
1. Whites commit hate crimes at a lower rate than others. Whites commit only 51% of hate crimes despite comprising a larger % of the public.
2. Anti-White crimes grew 38% the last five years. Anti-white rhetoric manifests in anti-white violence.
[Link]
or have Americans been trained it’s OK to hate them?
Yes
Thanks, Obama (and CRT).
Christians must hate themselves with 10,000 houses of worship a year going up for sale in the United States. More to come in the Islamic world too.
No hate, just people appreciating life on Earth more!
🙂
😉
Why Religion is Declining in Modern Societies| Rick Cragun
https://youtu.be/oPp-NTE6QwQ?si=wX37aweaPyCwf8VB
Well, now I know where you get a lot of your retarded and wrong talking-points from. Atheist Elmer Gantry's and Peter Popoff's have been the one of the most interesting phenomenon of the last 20 years.
"Shrike’s Democratic party pals have spent the last month reenacting Kristallnacht across America, killing Jews for being Jews and attacking their businesses."
Your citations fell off!!!
So you fully support Trump quoting Hitler, his love of dictators, his declaration that the Constitution says he can do whatever he wants, his describing Hispanic immigrants as "animals," and everything that implies.
Good to know.
He didn't quote Hitler. He used a relatively common English phrase that almost everyone has used and because Hitler used a German version of the phrase once, dishonest idiots are pretending it's a quote.
By that measure I could find a dozen phrases you use every day that I could pick from Mein Kampf's translation. Does that make you Hitler?
That's so weak.
It is factual. Read the entire quote he made retard. Instead of relying on leftist talking points.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12881811/Republican-lawmakers-turn-Trump-saying-migrants-poisoning-blood-country-quoting-Putin.html
Republican lawmakers turn on Trump for saying migrants are 'poisoning the blood' of our country and quoting Putin
Those leftist Republicans!
I don't recall "poisoning the blood" and calling some groups "vermin" being commonly used expressions either by American politicians or "regular folks".
Ask any historian for any historical parallels, and they will point to Hitler. Stalin and Mao, who were worse numerically, didn't use this kind of nationalist rhetoric and the language of disgust.
Bitter clingers, deplorables, trash people don't ring a bell?
Hillary referred to young blacks as super predators.
Funny you brought up vermin shrike. There is a link below for you. Lol.
You know that's not going to happen.
Whats funny is I gave him a link to leftist media using the proclaimed saying vermin equals Hitler just yesterday.
https://twitter.com/0rf/status/1732746683274932259
Oddly not a single criticism by him of it. Despite invoking trump is Hitler.
It's diff'rent when they do it.
Of course, it's (D)ifferent when they do it, you know.
I've told you I skip most of your posts and don't click your links. Last one was what you called "THE LIBERTARIANS POSITION ON IMMIGRATION" and it was some far-right nutter bloviating fallacies and hate.
So your ignorance is intentional. I understand this.
Back in the day:
"On Sept. 9, Biden criticized the millions of Americans who have remained unvaccinated. “We’ve been patient. But our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us,” he said.
Way back in the day:
I am grateful to Mr Chamberlain for all his efforts. I have assured him that the German people desires nothing else than peace, but I have also told him that I cannot go back behind the limits set to our patience. ... But in the same way I desire to state before the German people that with regard to the problem of the Sudeten Germans my patience is now at an end!
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/11/trumps-big-lie-and-hitlers-is-this-how-americas-slide-into-totalitarianism-begins/
Trump's Big Lie and Hitler's: Is this how America's slide into totalitarianism begins?
The above is mostly strictly factual, with very little editorializing. When I post it, the FACTS never get refuted… I only get called names. But what do you expect from morally, ethically, spiritually, and intellectually bankrupt Trumpturds?
Totalitarians want to turn GOP into GOD (Grand Old Dicktatorshit).
It was already pointed out to you that the "Big Lie" rhetoric originated with Hitler and was an accusation he made about the Jews. What you and your retarded (and grossly outdated) article are doing is adopting Hitler's argument and using it against MAGA.
And then you fucking idiots think Trump is Hitler for saying "Blood poisoning", when you're knowingly adopting a Hitler argument.
Absolutely amazing.
Can Ye TWIST Yer "logic" ANY more than that, Ye Perfect Serpent and Servant of the Evil One? Just go right ahead and say shit outright... "Good is evil, and evil is good!"
(I noticed that You and Your Imaginary Followers NEVER actually refute the contents of the link, by the way!)
I did at least a dozen times as have may other's here but you won't stop lying that it hasn't been.
Now here is the Wikipedia article backing up what I just said about who created the argument of the Big Lie.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie#Hitler's_description
You and Salon are copying Hitler, Shillsy.
"You and Salon are copying Hitler, Shillsy."
Twat, discussing evils done by evil-doers makes us evil?
HOW LOW CAN YOU AND YOUR LIES SINK AND STINK?
Never mind; I should NOT want to know!
Mammary-Necrophilia-Farter-Fuhrer stamps Her Perfectly Fat Feet and DEMANDS that NO ONE dare shine the light on EVIL, that it may CUNTINUE to do shit's work in deep, evil darkness!!!!
It never would have been possible to use "The Big Lie" on a society without centuries of that society being taught that believing makes it so. Wunner who did that?
The Company I work for is based out of Germany. One of the visiting engineers and I went to lunch one day. On the way back there was something going on and the traffic was being directed by the State Police. We pulled up and the engineer, who's English wasn't that good aske me who was stopping us. I said "Staatliche Polizei" The cop thought that I called him the Gestapo and got pissed. I said that I just told the guy beside me that you were "State Police" in German.
So having read the full statement sarc, which I now know for a fact you didnt....
A) he didn't quote Hitler.
B) he wasn't talking about genetic blood by symbolizing blood for policy, ethic, and foundation of the country.
You obviously didn't read past the single quote.
This is especially ironic as you cried about Godwin yesterday morning and then ran around invoking Trump shares the spirit if Hitler the rest of the day.
Did you bother reading the entirety of the statement? Because you look like a leftist retard if you did.
A) he didn’t quote Hitler.
See that sarc? Trump didn't literally quote Hitler's exact words. Sure, Trump used the same references that Hitler made and the same dehumanization and rhetoric that Hitler used towards his enemies. But it wasn't a *literal quotation*. Only an *exact literal quotation* will count, see? Oh, and it also has to be in German. And Trump has to be standing in Germany. Literally in the Munich Beer Hall. Then and ONLY THEN can Trump ever be compared to Hitler. Every other time, it is nonsense you see!
Screw facts, Jeffy feels The Truth!
There is nothing the man can do or say that Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS) will not defend.
Show us where he quoted Hitler as you claim.
You know better than this, Sarcasmic. I already showed you both quotes.
“[The President of Mexico] said he would “challenge” the law. “Challenge” could mean many things, not necessarily file a lawsuit in court.”
So in one situation its important that someone use the *exact* words, but in another its only necessary that the reader infer some sort of 'spirit of intent'?
^ This
It is important to read what was actually written. "Challenge" means "challenge". It doesn't mean "sue in court".
In the case of Trump he actually said that illegal immigrants were "poisoning the blood of our country". That's what he actually said. So if I were to take what he said literally, it would be even more of a direct comparison to Hitler, because Hitler wrote that Jews were "poisoning the blood" of Germany literally through miscegenation, diluting the supposedly pure blood of Aryan stock. Does Trump think that illegal immigrants are *LITERALLY* "poisoning the blood" of America in the way Hitler thought?
Is this really the argument that you want to make?
^ Chemjeff selectively nuanced individualist.
Believe it or not I am actually giving Trump a bit of the benefit of the doubt here by NOT claiming that he means LITERAL poisoning of the blood by diluting the supposed pure American blood in the way Hitler meant it when he wrote about it. I criticize him by making allusions that Hitler would approve of, by borrowing his style guide in his rhetoric, by dehumanizing the people he hates, and by being a terrible demagogue on the issue. But you all can't even bring yourselves to criticize him on that level.
One of the many different ways Lying Jeffy is dishonest.
"Trump didn’t literally quote Hitler’s exact words"
You, above.
https://reason.com/2023/12/20/houthis-ruin-christmas/?comments=true#comment-10365401
B) he wasn’t talking about genetic blood by symbolizing blood for policy, ethic, and foundation of the country.
But just yesterday, Jesse wrote:
He shouldn’t have said that. In fact he was wrong to.
https://reason.com/2023/12/19/texas-new-immigration-law-will-lead-to-more-policing-with-less-accountability/?comments=true#comment-10364357
But today, Jesse is now trying to defend Trump's statement, claiming that because he wasn't referring to literal blood then it's totally okay? So which is it, Jesse? What does Jesse really believe? Who knows?
Are you being retarded on purpose?
Explain how this wasn't metaphorical:
“They let — I think the real number is 15, 16 million people into our country. When they do that, we got a lot of work to do. They’re poisoning the blood of our country, That’s what they’ve done. They poison mental institutions and prisons all over the world, not just in South America, not just to three or four countries that we think about, but all over the world.
Are you being retarded on purpose?
It's Jeffy, therefore, the answer is a definitive and conclusive, yet very assertive "yes".
Am I being retarded? No.
Is ML being a complete and total dickhead standing up and defending authoritarians? Yes.
Is ITL defending ML and the rest of his tribal allies around here like a good little lapdog? Yes.
Go blow it out your fat ass, dip.
Maybe you should stop defending authoritarian right-wing dickheads.
"Is ML being a complete and total dickhead standing up and defending authoritarians?"
How the fuck are the facists removing a politician from the ballot based solely on the allegations of his political opponents not authoritarian, you goose-stepping fuck.
You're a complete parody.
Oh look, here's ML to join the chat to defend his pal Jesse and to call me a Nazi. How predictable.
Stop pushing the ideas, policies and rhetoric of the Third Reich and I will stop calling you one.
Just realized sarc went full retard again.
his declaration that the Constitution says he can do whatever he wants
He never said that. The quote you used was specifically regarding firing political appointees. What is hilarious is you tried this same narrative as sqrsly.
This shows facts don't matter to you. You'll blindly repeat leftist talking points even when obvious lies.
Just realized sarc went full retard again.
What day doesn't he go full retard right now?
Look, Sarc, I know that Laursen is gone, but you don't need to curry favor with every other authoritarian fool out there.
The authoritarians are the ones who want to round up tens of millions of foreigners, and don't care about how empowering police to do this will erode our rights in ways similar to the war on drugs. Because immigrants are bad, m'kay.
Using the gun of the state for massive wealth transfers in the hundreds of billions is much better than enforcing residency requirements literally every country enjoys.
You're deliberately conflating foreigners with illegal aliens there, Fiona. Even those here legally are sick of the illegal aliens' shtick.
So you support more police powers if it means catching illegals. Good to know.
And where did I say that, Sarc? You whine about people misinterpreting what you think (when you post something completely different), but you don't hesitate to throw words in someone else's mouth. Hypocrisy is thy name, eh?
How else do you cleanse the blood of the nation, smart guy?
Sarc still pretending it was being used racially. Lol.
Trump said "poison". You're the one saying "cleanse". Ergo, by Jeff's argument, you are Hitler.
Cleanse falls under wishful thinking fallacy. Perhaps projection.
Sarc, what would you like to have happen to Jesse, RMac, and ML?
Coming from the guy supporting the J6 prosecutions this is pretty rich.
As far as I can tell from reading the law in Texas it is a secondary charge, not primary. Just like the Arizona version a decade back that leftists lied about. There is no excess police power as criminals are already verified as to who they are.
The only application I can see in the law as a primary occurrence is if a state police officer watches someone illegally cross the border.
The law literally exempts its use in a large portion of society such as schools, church, health care, etc.
But you didnt read the law did you.
https://reason.com/2023/12/19/texas-new-immigration-law-will-lead-to-more-policing-with-less-accountability/
This is what you are promoting: More police power and less police accoutability.
You realize Fiona (+ChatGTP) was absolutely full of shit with that hot garbage, right?
I read the law. Fiona didn't retard. Her liberal projections based on what if and not application is meaningless. Lol.
Now do those nasty vaccine-deniers.
If there's a problem with the blood of the nation, then you've got to cleanse the blood. Funny how those of us who find that language to be disturbing are the ones being accused of authoritarianism, while the ones who get giddy at the prospect are not.
Thomas Jefferson was Hitler!!!
If there’s a problem with the blood of the nation, then you’ve got to cleanse the blood.
If there's blood poisoning you remove the source of the infection and provide antibiotics. You don't "cleanse" someone's blood. That would be dangerous and retarded.
“They let — I think the real number is 15, 16 million people into our country. When they do that, we got a lot of work to do. They’re poisoning the blood of our country, That’s what they’ve done.”
What does "a lot of work" look like to you? To me it looks like more intrusive government, but people who would otherwise balk support it because "Illegals! Welfare!"
Social Security and Medicare are what's bankrupting the country. Not illegal immigrants.
I'm missing the word cleanse. You've used it a half dozen times now.
He was lying. Too much time trying to be Lying Jeffy’s friend.
What do you mean by "more intrusive government"? Border agents?
You're far off in Maine so your away from what's happening, but when the population of a state shoots up by 25% almost overnight, what do you think happens to housing, wages, hospitals, emergency services, taxes, infrastructure?
It collapses.
And you know who swoops in to pick up the pieces? Government. A lot more government.
Here in far off Maine, Border Patrol has jurisdiction over most if not all of the state. Remember they get 100 miles in from the border, and this state is mostly one big border. And when it comes to those guys, the Constitution doesn't matter at all. I've been stopped at one of their roadblocks on the highway in the center of the state.
Do I want more of that? No. No, I do not.
As far as the rest goes, that's what people have been saying for fucking ever. Like since the dawn of civilization.
You would if you had 38,000 "moose-fuckers" moving through Maine each month.
He never said that.
Trump's exact words:
"Then I have an Article 2, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President."
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-turning-point-usas-teen-student-action-summit-2019/
One more time, Jesse is deflecting on behalf of Team Red. I sense a pattern here.
He lies and pushes a narrative while accusing others of lying and pushing a narrative.
Youre literally pushing a narrative. The full quote exists. The entire speech can be found online.
But you now don't care about facts and evidence. You care about the leftist talking point Du Jour. Just like Jeff.
Notice neither of you calling the leftist media above for invoking Hitler in their use of vermin.
Never see you calling out Nardz for using terms like vermin and cancer to describe people who vote differently than you.
That means you support cutting the cancer out or killing off the vermin.
So it's no surprise you defend language about cleansing the blood of the nation.
Um, just a few weeks ago, ML and Jesse were indeed calling out Nardz. Just for the record there.
For what, Israel? Ukraine?
Certainly not for describing people who vote differently as something to be cleansed.
The only people here screaming Hitler is you and shrike retard. I domt care the left media used vermin. The thread and its usage is to point out your retarded hypocrisy and narrative usage.
Youre not smart sarc.
Your spelling and grammar mistakes increase the angrier you get lol.
"Certainly not for describing people who vote differently as something to be cleansed."
I do believe that after the Nazis, the Democratic Party has been the evilest political party in the Western world. Worse by oppression and death toll than Mussolini's Fascists and Spain's Falangists.
Their voters are gaslight and propagandized, but the party is demonic.
the Democratic Party has been the evilest political party in the Western world
I would say the Progressive Movement is what changed the relationship between people and government. While they have a stronger foothold in the Democratic Party, I can think of a couple Republican presidents who were pretty progressive.
Sarc, what other political party in the US did the following:
1. Deliberately ignored a Supreme Court decision and removed the Cherokee from Georgia anyway.
2. Propagated the expansion of slavery and called it the natural order of things.
3. Instigated and fought a war to conquer territory explicitly for the expansion of chattel slavery.
4. When they didn't get their way in an election, threw a massive temper tantrum that resulted in a Civil War over the slavery and expansion of slavery issue.
5. After said Civil War, they then instituted a caste system in order to retain their former positions over their former slaves.
6. Curtailed the rights of their former slaves and then disenfranchised them so they couldn't rebel through the ballot box.
7. Passed sedition acts just before and during the US's involvement in WWI, even going so far as to imprison objectors to the US involvement in WWI (see: Eugene Debs).
8. Massively expanded the federal bureaucracy during the Great Depression, intruding into the everyday affairs of most Americans.
9. Attempted to pack the Supreme Court when they didn't get their way with New Deal legislation.
10. Expanded the US involvement in Vietnam while expanding the federal bureaucracy once again (Great Society) into Americans' lives while printing off so much money to pay for both that it resulted in massive inflation.
11. Attempted to take a Presidential election by continuous counts in Florida (2000). When that failed, they defamed the person who did become President.
12. Voted for the Iraq invasion and then lied about having done so later.
13. Passed Obamacare without any review, discussion, or debate which raised health care insurance premiums while lowering the state of care for Americans while also claiming, "you can keep your doctor".
14. Then put up the worst candidate ever to run for President, even manipulating the primaries and delegates so she could have her turn at it.
15. Defamed the opposition candidate with a fake dossier and fake allegations of him colluding with Russia and Putin.
16. When she lost to him, they then did everything they could to make his life in the White House hell.
17. Two politically motivated impeachments of said President to try to get rid of him before his term was complete.
18. Shutting down entire state economies (some of which have yet to return to normal) for a virus they could never control.
19. Using said virus as an excuse to manipulate and change (commonly by executive order) election laws so that it would be easier for them to cheat during the election and remove a President from office.
20. Claim that a protest was an insurrection and then charge those involved with silly crimes and keep them imprisoned for years prior to any sort of trial.
21. Continue funding a war between Ukraine and Russia that has little strategic value for the US in any way, shape, or form so they could protect their money laundering schemes.
22. Attempt to knock a Presidential contender off the ballot.
I'm sure there's much more, and I haven't even touched on the Clintons.
What part of "more of a foothold in the Democratic Party" made you think I said "Republicans are more progressive"?
Because I don't push my enemy is Hitler like you are doing retard.
lol really? I'm willing to bet that if I look hard enough I can find an instance or two of you comparing "the Left" to Nazis. And besides, even if you haven't, you have consistently run cover for those around here who have.
Trump is not 'literal Hitler' but he is borrowing Hitler's rhetoric and style guide. Why is that, do you think?
Just the other day he was on some tirade about how the left says nazism was far right but it's really far left, but I quickly got lost when he started arguing against what I supposedly believe. I'm not going to defend things I don't support, and he's going to call me a liar if I say that's not what I support. Really dumb.
That was probably me, Sarc, because it's true. There are enough Nazi speeches out there to demonstrate that, and then there's the party's record and its platform.
It was only years after the war that left-wing professors and the Soviet Union started pushing the narrative that National Socialism was a right wing phenomena.
And my argument is still that the right/left paradigm is dumb. If I wanted everyone to have machine guns, and supported abortion up until birth, I'd balance out as a moderate. That's just dumb. Really it just means each side can, with enough cherry picking, accuse some historical bad guy of being on the other guy's team, or claim some good guy was on their team. Again, it's dumb.
And my argument is still that the right/left paradigm is dumb.
I absolutely agree, because those words are essentially meaningless. The world right now is rather split between an authoritarian cargo cult run by the global elites, and the other side is everyone else.
But usually when an elitist is criticizing the "right-wing" they're actually attacking the proles, so I respond accordingly.
Ummm, ok.
Jeff and Shrike will continuously attack something as right-wing but refuse to define what they mean by that, because they don't want to have a definition.
They want a word to smear the dirty poors who get in the way of their paymasters, and a definition would wreck that.
I would define left and right wing as what it takes to be accepted into, and not thrown out of, the political tribes that think of themselves as left and right wing.
Can you define either of those terms without using them within the definition?
They are subjective and fluid. Being on the outside looking in I don't keep track. I just know that if someone screams "Leftist!" or "Fascist!" at anyone who disagrees with them, they're probably defending their tribe's position.
Lol. Sarc. Here is your thread. You jumped in to defend shrike calling fascism far right.
Why do you lie about shit you know I have bookmarked?
https://reason.com/2023/12/12/texas-abortion-law-test/?comments=true#comment-10354105
And sarc... you are the fucking biggest tribalist here. Thats why you want definitions to be fluid so you can claim it doesn't apply to you. You call everyone else right wing, conservatives, forever trumpers as you constantly defend the left. Lol.
No, that's not what I said. I said, in response to you saying Fascism has always been leftist "That explains why Hitler sent communists to the camps."
My point was that the left-right paradigm is dumb because it doesn't get much more leftist than commies, and fascists liked to kill commies.
So you accuse me of saying fascism was far-right?
Dude, how many stupid pills do you eat a day?
And you post the link too, to show off your stupidity. Jesus.
Awe, sarc’s still sad we appropriately used the word fascist to describe his precious democrats. It’s ok sarc, some day you’ll understand what it means.
HAHAHA, I’m just kidding, you’re just not smart enough to understand the word. Poor sarc.
Jeffy and sarc scrambled for years to find two brain cells to rub together. In the end, after failing to do so, they settled on just circle-jerking each other.
Their combined effort was frot with stiff resistance.
And then we have Obama:
“Well, I think as– as you know– and I’ve said this before to you, Jose, but– I’m not a king,” Obama replied. “You know, my job as the head of the executive branch ultimately is to carry out the law. And– you know, when it comes to enforcement of our immigration laws– we’ve got some discretion. We can prioritize– what we do. But we can’t simply ignore the law.”
Then weeks later DACA and DASA, which simply ignored the law.
Obama got taken to the woodshed almost 50 times by unanimous SCOTUS decisions. E.g., when he tried to make recess appointments when Congress was deliberately NOT in recess.
"But the reason Obama was hit with so many more unanimous decisions was because he went rogue early on, asking his staff to look for novel theories that would allow him to move forward with implementing his agenda. And if that meant twisting the Constitution — and basic logic — to get it, so what?
"If others didn’t like it and decided to seek legal remedy, the president knew he had a chance of slow-walking the process through the courts for months or even years. Hence his taunt to Republicans: “So sue me.”
"And if he got a unanimous Supreme Court smackdown for his efforts, as he has 44 times, he would simply say that he disagreed and go to his next rally where hundreds of people, also tired of being constrained by the Constitution, would cheer him on.
-------------
Joe Biden gets told by the Supreme Court that he cannot forgive billions of dollars of student loans. Joe does it anyway.
Repeat after me:
It is wrong for Trump to be comparing immigrants to vermin, and it is wrong for Trump to be accusing them of "poisoning the blood" of the nation, regardless of what Obama or Biden might or might not have done.
Can you say that in good conscience?
I can. Yup. That was easy.
Many, many people around here cannot. And that is sad.
Is it because they don't agree, or because they know they'll be heckled?
Repeat after me, you two.
"Entering a country illegally is not the same thing as legal immigration and I shouldn't deliberately conflate the two for the purpose of cheap demagoguery."
Can you say that?
It's true, but I don't think that you can.
Repeat after me, "Papiers, bitte."
They don't care. It's not about argumentation. It is always about being on offense and attacking the Left.
So if someone on Team Red does something good, then they offer praise and attack the Left for not being on board or agreeing.
And if someone on Team Red does something bad, ignore it and attack the Left in some way.
It's just constant full-on attack mode. Never having to stand for anything or defend an argument. Just attack attack attack.
Team Jeff is putting political adversaries in jail on phony charges, censoring the internet and removing political opponents from the ballot, but complain about it and "It is always about being on offense and attacking the Left".
Amazing.
I don't know about team jeff, but team sarc supports more ballot access. Not less. What happened in CO is BS.
Yeah, god forbid the country have borders and enforce them or a sane legal immigration system, it makes us just like Nazi Germany.
For fucks sake…
It's not about "having borders". It's about how you treat people.
As I mentioned in a previous discussion, this entire episode is not about policy per se. It is about shifting the cultural narrative, from one which is tolerant and compassionate towards immigrants, to one that is fearful and contemptuous towards immigrants.
IF enough of the population believes that immigrants are a bunch of rapists, or a bunch of layabout moochers, or a bunch of worthless people, then it becomes easier to justify the 'extreme measures' that would be necessary to deport all the illegal immigrants and enforce the border wall with lethal force.
This is about shifting the cultural narrative. It isn't about policy per se.
Do you believe immigrants are worthy of respect and compassion, or not? If not, then you are on Team Trump.
Words and lies mean more than actions according to sarc and Jeff.
Words and lies mean more than actions according to sarc and Jeff.
And precisely how many times have you complained about Biden's "red speech", which was nothing but "words and lies" accompanied by dark imagery? Hmm? I believe the answer is "many, many times".
What the hell are you trying to pull?
We've certainly seen the fascist unconstitutional actions following his Red Speech in the last two years.
No, ML, you're the Nazi.
Glad I could clear that up.
So why are the jackboots on your feet?
Orthopedic jackboots with extra cushioning?
If anyone has jackboots around here, it's ML. He is the one who has advocated for using force against people who choose differently than him when it comes to transgender individuals and their choice of bathrooms.
"I have [...] to do [...] President."
Oh my good lord, he wants to fuck Biden! Call NYT! Wapo, get on this!
Remember when he was all about 'shared understanding of reality'?
And he was denying that this meant ignoring facts in favor of group narratives?
And yet here he is, doing exactly that.
I never used the phrase "shared understanding of reality", that was you.
And I was referring to actual FACTS, such as "hydrogen is an element", and "the Dominion voting machines were not hacked by Hugo Chavez". Things like that.
Instead, it's you and your team which is continually blurring the line between fact and opinion, in a post-modernist deconstruction of truth itself. That is what is dangerous, but you will never admit to such, because your team derives power from bullshit.
If I had a dollar for each gender, I’d have two bucks and a lot of counterfeits.
*lmao*
Beautiful.
And right on cue, here comes Jesse to deflect on behalf of the right.
I wish I was surprised that Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS) are defending his affection for Hitler, but I'm not.
Hitler once ordered a coffee with cream, and sarc ordered a coffee with cream.
SARC IS QUOTING HITLER!
Because ordering coffee and cleansing the blood of the nation are the same thing. Suuure, buddy.
Here you are, supporting *ordering people around* - just like Hitler.
I wish you could explain why you think Trump has affection for Hitler, but you won't.
Speaking of evil, I notice you wrote Hitler's name earlier. Using the sophistry set out in Buttplug's Politico link that means that you love him.
I actually thought you might be the one who wouldn't defend Trump on this.
What do we call it when a person judges others on whether they hate Trump enough?
Stop being gullible.
Here's what Trump said:
"“They let — I think the real number is 15, 16 million people into our country. When they do that, we got a lot of work to do. They’re poisoning the blood of our country, That’s what they’ve done. They poison mental institutions and prisons all over the world, not just in South America, not just to three or four countries that we think about, but all over the world. They’re coming into our country from Africa, from Asia, all over the world.”
Here's what Hitler actually said:
“All great cultures of the past perished only because the originally creative race died out from blood poisoning,”
That is sophistry at it's worst. Blood poisoning is an incredibly common metaphor.
Sarc is too dumb to realize blood is symbolism. The speech was discussing policies and fabric of the nation. But the left says he meant genetic blood and it was racial so sarc runs with it without question.
Thomas fucking Jefferson used the symbolism of blood for fucks sake. But sarc has gone full leftist, blindly repeating their narratives.
Der TrumpfenFuhrer ***IS*** responsible for agitating for democracy to be replaced by mobocracy!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/trump-election-warnings-leaving-office/index.html
A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses.
Essential heart and core of the LIE by Trump: “ANY election results not confirming MEEE as Your Emperor, MUST be fraudulent!”
September 13 rally: “The Democrats are trying to rig this election because that’s the only way they’re going to win,” he said.
Trump’s constant re-telling and supporting the Big Lie (any election not electing Trump is “stolen”) set up the environment for this (insurrection riot) to happen. He shares the blame. Boys will be boys? Insurrectionists will be insurrectionists, trumpanzees gone apeshit will be trumpanzees gone apeshit, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Trump was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
It really should immediately make us think of Krystallnacht. Hitler and the NAZIs set up for this by constantly blaming Jews for all things bad. Jew-haters will be Jew-haters, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Hitler was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?
Go fuck off, NaziSqrlsy.
Make me, you wussy pussy-shit! You, and whose army?
Oooo, I see the mask is off the squirrel. No stupid Tim the Enchanter copypasta or other such crappola.
Ask, and ye shall receive wisdom! Knock, and the door shall be opened for ye!
Do you recall the awesome enchanter named “Tim”, in “Monty Python and the Search for the Holy Grail”? The one who could “summon fire without flint or tinder”? Well, you remind me of Tim… You are an enchanter who can summon persuasion without facts or logic!
So I discussed your awesome talents with some dear personal friends on the Reason staff… Accordingly…
Reason staff has asked me to convey the following message to you:
Hi Fantastically Talented Author:
Obviously, you are a silver-tongued orator, and you also know how to translate your spectacular talents to the written word! We at Reason have need for writers like you, who have near-magical persuasive powers, without having to write at great, tedious length, or resorting to boring facts and citations.
At Reason, we pay above-market-band salaries to permanent staff, or above-market-band per-word-based fees to freelancers, at your choice. To both permanent staff, and to free-lancers, we provide excellent health, dental, and vision benefits. We also provide FREE unlimited access to nubile young groupies, although we do firmly stipulate that persuasion, not coercion, MUST be applied when taking advantage of said nubile young groupies.
Please send your resume, and another sample of your writings, along with your salary or fee demands, to ReasonNeedsBrilliantlyPersuasiveWriters@Reason.com .
Thank You! -Reason Staff
You're too easy, NaziSqrlsy.
Fuck off and die, spastic asshole.
SHOW us how it's done, asshole hypocrite!!!
And even then, Hitler was talking about genetics. Trump is talking about what makes our republic function. Two entirely different things.
When they do that, we got a lot of work to do. They’re poisoning the blood of our country, That’s what they’ve done.
What's the next step? You cleanse the blood. How do you do that?
See you are enjoying your early Christmas gift, a Jump to Conclusions mat.
So he's getting everyone riled up against nasty immigrants, saying that they're poisoning the blood of the country, and that has no implications at all? Come on. You're smarter than that.
So you are enjoying your Jump to Conclusions mat.
You're not.
How do you cleanse the blood of the nation of the blood of illegals? Hmmm? This is what you are defending. How do you do it?
"How do you do it?" Starvation, gas chambers, being worked to death, rampant diseases in concentration camps... THIS is what the haters want, but they're too pussy-shit to take us STRAIGHT there! They want to take us there in TINY LITTLE STEPS, starting with babies in wire cages, and losing track of their MomDads!!!
Sarc. Do you realize ML posted the fucking quote and you continue to lie about it?
"They let — I think the real number is 15, 16 million people into our country. When they do that, we got a lot of work to do. They’re poisoning the blood of our country, That’s what they’ve done."
Blood is poisoned and we've got a lot of work to do. But that's all metaphorical, right?
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
.
Thomas Jefferson
He said blood. He is cleansing people! Jefferson was Hitler!!
Thomas Jefferson was discussing WAR against tyrants! He was NOT discussing putting helpless innocent babies into wire cages, and deliberately losing track of their MomDads, or similar hateful point-scoring in order to "own the libs" tribalistically! There are HUGE differences here, deliberately deceptive and EVIL One!
Wow, Squirrely. That was remarkably sane.
The squirrel said something cogent? Worth unmuting or just better than the normal blathering copypasta gibberish?
No.
Mentally and-or work-ethic-challenged Chumpy Chump is TOO stupid, and-or TOO lazy, to do its own reading, for itself! TWAT a surprise!
Remarkably sane for him. Still bonkers by normal standards.
sarc, thanks. I’ll keep the tree rat muted. He does sometimes offer up something nice but doesn’t sound like this is one of those instances.
Don't play dumb. He is acting in the role of a demagogue. That is what they do. They rile up the crowd with emotional appeals. It is irresponsible and dangerous rhetoric.
If some left-winger had said "Those conservatives are poisoning the blood of the nation", you would not stand for it. You would rightly call it out as a dangerous rhetoric intended to vilify and incite extreme reaction against conservatives.
Nobody ever tells Jesse to stop playing dumb, or that he's smarter than that.
Have we reached JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer "peak dumbness" yet? Can it EVER be reached?
Have we reached JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer “peak dumbness” yet? Can it EVER be reached?
No, just when we think we've reached "peak dumbness", one of you idiots opens his mouth.
What did I say that was dumb sarc. Provide a citation.
Is it because I don't blindly push leftist narratives?
https://reason.com/2020/02/07/michael-bloomberg-and-the-imperious-presidency-2/#comment-8120658
JesseSPAZ comment: “He can fire political appointees for any fucking reason he wants.” With Respect to Der TrumpfenFuhrer, of course!
Jesse’s over-archingly lusting after the super-powers of the Trumptatorshit YET AGAIN!!!
Trump can fire them for not assigning their entire paychecks to Trump… For not licking Trump’s balls ass much ass JesseSPAZ does… For turning down Trump’s requests for then to perform personal murder-for-hire… For having fucked Spermy Daniels out of turn, when it was Trump’s turn… For Air Force Captain-Sir-Dude-Sir-Pilot-Sir refusing orders to go and bomb Nancy Pelosi’s house…
Just when I was rooting for JesseSPAZ to turn from his evil ways, he doubles down on Trumptatorshit-worship AGAIN!
"Don’t play dumb. He is acting in the role of a demagogue. That is what they do."
Say's Jeff, acting in the role of demagogue.
Jeff: "They rile up the crowd with emotional appeals. It is irresponsible and dangerous rhetoric."
The Crowd:
Sarckles: "Nobody ever tells Jesse to stop playing dumb"
Shillsy: "Have we reached JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer “peak dumbness”
It's like watching a comedy skit, but the hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness are genuine which makes it creepy more than funny.
The sad part is people in the crowd who would otherwise be offended by government creeping in on liberty are demanding that something be done about the illegal immigrant problem. And they're demanding that from government. Well, how is government going to do that? C'mon. Are you that short-sighted? Did you forget the Iron Law of "Me today. You tomorrow."?
Enforcing laws that have been on the books for a century and have worked well and are common world wide, isn't government creeping in on liberty.
The Democrats are deliberately creating an emergency so they can do again what they did with Covid.
Enforcing laws that have been on the books for a century and have worked well and are common world wide, isn’t government creeping in on liberty.
You really don't think "the illegal immigrant problem" won't be used as an excuse for more laws, more police power, and less police accountability? This is America we're talking about here. Never let a crisis go to waste.
Ok sarc, bring on the vigilante justice!
Well if the nation's blood is poisoned and there's a lot to do, and government isn't going to do it, then that's the only other option.
Hey, why stop with illegals? If we gonna “cleanse” this place, let’s do it right!
You worried about that too, Jeff? Lol. You are gullible.
Just yesterday morning I got you cried about Godwin law. Then as the typical hypocritical piece of shit you are you spent the rest of the day invoking trump is Hitler after misreading his quote because the left media told you to.
Speaking of Godwin's Law:
"‘Trump Knows What He’s Doing’: The Creator of Godwin’s Law Says the Hitler Comparison Is Apt"
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/19/godwins-law-trump-hitler-00132427
When Godwin himself jumped the shark.
We all saw Dark Brandon give his speech from the red stage, trying to project power by leveraging visuals that virtually everyone said "Looks like a Nazi designed the stage". So much so that CNN et al. adjusted their color wheels to try to tone it all down.
More Wolfe, less Sullum and Boehm. Unreluctantly.
This^
^ Yes, this, very much so.
Dem official fined a whopping $500 for intentionally voting in multiple states. Money quote.
"Finally, Ms. Rubio stated that it was 'never really stated that you are not able to vote in more than one state,' and that she thought that if one attempted to do so, the 'system' would block one from doing so," the board's order said, according to NBC News.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-dc-official-fined-500-for-voting-twice-2020-election
Was that wrong? Should I have not done that? I tell you I gotta plead ignorance on this thing because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing was frowned upon, you know, cause I've worked in a lot of offices and I tell you people do that all the time.
Show up for work, yada yada yada, lost my job.
No "widespread" fraud.
And just to make sure it wasn't widespread, don't investigate.
When only four judges engage in lawfare, that technically isn’t widespread.
You know what was widespread? That Democratic Party staffer in the US senate judiciary committee hearing room.
Hey, is that a fat joke? That better not be a fat joke, because fat-hating talk is strictly prohibited.
The staffer was hoping it was fat. Staffergape.
Why, you want a fat joke?
When Jeffy sits around his mom's basement, he sits around his mom's basement.
"I'm sorry officer...I didn't know I couldn't do that."
Gays for Palestine meet Palestine. Video.
https://twitter.com/DaveAtherton20/status/1736858582258471358
https://babylonbee.com/news/palestinian-flag-outside-rashida-tlaibs-office-seen-throwing-pride-flag-off-the-roof
Lol.
Lol, the guy in the blue polo shirt blocked things for about 2 seconds before he was like "well, at least I tried" and wandered off.
Colorado's Supreme Court ruled late last night that Donald Trump is not eligible to seek the presidency...
One way or another, he wasn't getting those votes.
The important part is to give the left the ability to scream about the popular vote if he does win.
That's one thing the left will scream about. If Trump wins again, US cities will burn. Leftists will target conservative individuals.
Keep your powder dry.
But they would never, ever, ever gather in an insurrectiony mob and storm the Capitol and put feet on desks and carry zip ties and fire extinguishers. And if they did it would be totally different and totally justified and protecting democracy from a rigged stolen election.
Why would cities burn?
There's something really critical to remember here--the legalistic arguments behind all this are just a rhetorical smokescreen. Don't get caught up in all the discussions over whether the 14th Amendment prevents Trump from running or not, or whether it requires a conviction to kick him off the ballot.
That's not the issue. It's like talking about a bomb blast when the plane has already flown over and past the target area (hat tip: James Lindsay). The issue is that Democrats and their center-right enablers, like the NeverTrumper ex-GOP plaintiffs who brought the lawsuit, are trying to provide the legal justification to force you to accept that they can tell you whom you can or can't vote for. THAT'S the real issue. Everything else is just background noise.
When the left and center-right start arguing that the 14th Amendment provides this justification, do not, under ANY circumstances, take the fucking bait. Turn it back on them and tell them that no state, no judicial branch, no government official, nor any political operative has the right nor even the authority to tell you who you're allowed to vote for. When they try to re-direct back to the 14th Amendment, tell them that the 14th Amendment isn't the issue, the issue is the government, with the blessing of the judiciary, giving itself the formal authorization to dictate your choice of political candidate, irrespective of whom you might actually support.
Put it back on them by asserting your right to vote for whomever you please, that no state has the authority to tell you otherwise, and that if they support it, that means they want to control whom you can and can't vote for as well.
+1
And just to demonstrate what a fucking banana republic Colorado has turned into, with the help of the drug addicts and neo-yuppie left-liberal scumbags on the Front Range:
Note that the political environment in the state is so dysfunctional right now that two freshmen legislators of the ruling party, which has a hard majority in the state house and controls every single electable state office, can't take it and noped the fuck out of there before their term was even up.
Colorado needs an enema, starting with its radical left population in Denver and Boulder, and its boot-licking liberal population in the metro suburbs.
Don't forget to also flush the hyper-liberal mountain resort towns.
Turn it back on them and tell them that no state, no judicial branch, no government official, nor any political operative has the right nor even the authority to tell you who you’re allowed to vote for.
So, get rid of all ballot access laws?
Ballot access is not the same as saying "You aren't allowed to vote for this person," but it's no surprise you're trying to obfuscate the issue with this misdirection.
Poor, poor Trumpy-poo is being SEVERELY PUNISHED by (possibly) NOT being allowed to be POTUS, and RULE AND DROOL over us ALL!!! WITHOUT having been duly convicted of insurrection!!! POOR, POOR Trumpy-pooo!!!
Well, “Governator” Arnie Schwarzenegger is ALSO prohibited from being POTUS, and RULING AND DROOLING over us ALL!!! Yet Arnie has NEVER been convicted of the “crime” of being a NON-native-born USA citizen! Which is a requirement for being POTUS!!!
Being jailed, fined, or KILLED by Government Almighty is ONE thing… NOT being allowed to becum a Government Almighty Power Pig, to Rule us All, is a TOTALLY different thing!!!
Would you whining crybabies PLEASE fuck the hell OFF?!?!
So, get rid of all ballot access laws?
If you're going to be honest here, you'll acknowledge that a number of them are used to keep third parties off the ballot. But, you're just on a libertarian website in their comment section, so that might make you think again.
“If you’re going to be honest here,”
Spoiler Alert: He’s not going to be honest.
In Reid technique, when folks say “I’m being honest” or “I’m not lying” it is a cue to look closer for deception. Someone here drops that stuff occasionally.
Yes. The constitution has the requirements listed, and these are clearly objective, knowable, observable criteria. Are you 35 years old? Are you a US citizen? We need no further laws. If people want to vote for Charles Manson, let them.
I’m sure you’re not in favor of ballot access laws being used to make it harder for third party candidates to get on the ballot, or are you?
Again, this is just a red herring. Third parties being left off ballots doesn't prevent voters from writing in the names. I don't support preventing third parties from being listed, either, but again, it's not the real issue.
This is the state telling its voters that they are not allowed to vote for a specific candidate based strictly on Fuck You, That's Why.
9 states don't allow write in votes.
Illinois does, but the write-in vote must be from the approved list. Therefore, we really don't have write-in votes.
The Colorado Supreme Court doesn't prohibit write-in votes for Trump.
So again, what is your problem?
Oh right, you are being a dishonest shithead.
I am not in favor of ballot access laws being used to make it harder for third party candidates to be on the ballot.
But as we see from RRWP's responses, his position of "the state has no business telling people who to vote for!" is a lie. He is totally comfortable with the state telling people who to vote for in the form of ballot access laws. He just uses that argument disingenuously to justify not kicking Trump off the ballot.
>non-sequitur alert<
This Colorado thing is exactly what the new sites and dems meant when they said Trump would be the end of our democracy.
they have literally said he would do things like THIS if he gets elected and it would be the end of democracy!
One can almost place bets (and set a clock) by what Democrats claim regarding Trump these days. If they claim he will do something if elected, you can wager safely that the Dems either are already doing such a thing or will do such a thing in the not-so-distant future.
This is a lot like the opening of Captain America: Civil War where the Avengers are trying to stop Crossbones from stealing a biological weapon in Lagos, and Scarlet Witch redirects a bomb explosion into a building that ends up killing a bunch of people.
Except it was an accident and she was actually remorseful about her actions.
If Roberts has any fucking sense, and if there's one thing we know about it him is that he is monumentally conflict-averse, he'll immediately gather the other justices together and say, "We need to shut this shit down right away, or it's going to open up a whole Pandora's box of political tit-for-tat which will tear the country apart. Political operatives are going to use this to find any justification they can to remove candidates from ballots, based on wholly partisan purposes, and it's going to cause total chaos. We're going to tell these people to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up, indicate that similar lawsuits going on right now will be equally dismissed with prejudice, and assert the will of the people to determine whom they can vote for or not, not any government entity."
We'll see if he does that or knuckles under like he did with Obamacare.
We have to destroy Democracy in order to protect Democracy.
Amazing that the Dems are working so hard to remove the one guy from the primaries who Biden might actually have a chance to beat. Without the anti-trump vote, it's hard to imagine Joe getting more than maybe 30% of the vote (35% if he replaces Kamala Harris as the person in line to replace him when the animatronics that make him move go out of warranty.
Trump hasn't been convicted of that class of crime today, but by the 2024 election, he might actually have a record which includes a conviction that's been overturned on appeal. He is facing an indictment in D.C. where at least 7-8 of any 12 random people gathered off the street would be happy to rule him guilty of both the JFK assassination and the Lindbergh kidnapping.
This is beautiful and insightful, on the joy of having children as well as how we ought to look at the current fertility crisis...
What about Climate Change? Won't someone please think of the children???
I suppose we could consider killing the children as 'thinking of them'.
Just like democracy, we have to destroy humanity in order to save it.
Pluggo is thinking of the children.
A paper company in Guangdong, China, is saying that "employees need to clock 62 miles every month if they want to get an annual bonus worth 130% of their monthly salary..."
SIXTY-TWO MILES OF WHAT?
Snorting Wasabi.
Hundred dollar bills for "the big guy"?
SIXTY-TWO MILES OF WHAT?
Taiwan.
If they fail, the money gets transferred to the paper company’s charity Scott’s Tots.
"The scope of exercise includes running, hiking, walking, etc. The amount of exercise is based on the check-in on APPs such as Gudong"
Well, I guess that rules out putting a fitbit on your dog's collar and letting him run around the yard.
I'd walk two miles a day for double the salary.
A paper company in Guangdong, China...
Dundel Miffrin, Inc.
More tax trouble for members of the Biden family, who can't seem to figure out how to pay the IRS what they owe.
It turns out fair share is a sliding scale based on reverse influence.
All women should be supported and empowered...
One hundred grand is quite empowering.
All women should be supported..
I prefer the braless look.
For some, that falls flat.
Not everyone gets to go motor boating in the silicone valley.
This one flopped.
”All women should be supported and empowered to make their own decisions about their bodies and what is best for them”
Try fitting that onto an NBA jersey
...there's no way that a gram of plutonium is worth 3,000x a cup of coffee.
Not Starbucks coffee.
Starbucks Milk*
We've shifted from the "Barbie Price Index" to the plutonium one I guess.
Today, the lifeblood of Southern California's tech scene is charged by an unapologetically optimistic pack of engineers, machinists, and entrepreneurs building at the frontier of atoms-based technology...
They've seen too much Barbie and not enough Oppenheimer.
MOAR PINK!!!
"Today, the lifeblood of Southern California's tech scene is charged by an unapologetically optimistic pack of engineers, machinists, and entrepreneurs building at the frontier of atoms-based technology," writes Founders Fund's Scott Nolan for Pirate Wires on El Segundo's tech scene
Who are you going to believe, this guy or Fred Sanford?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUSgNGAKYZg
"All women should be supported and empowered to make their own decisions about their bodies and what is best for them."
And if one of those decisions is to have unprotected sex, they get to kill a baby?
That guy signed a contract worth 260 million. $100,000? Piffle.
Why take 100k once when you can extract double that or more per year for 18 years?
Hey, women, like all oppressed people, cannot be held responsible for their actions, and by the power of intersectionality politics are entitled to void all contracts and consequences.
I do sometimes think this is an actual goal of progressives, in their quest for permanent child status as underlings in a nanny state.
It explains middle class white women driving $100K SUVs claiming victim status.
Well, that's fine, but if they're children, they shouldn't be able to vote.
Bingo.
https://twitter.com/_kruptos/status/1737475581959115227?t=vafD8z8xJZvc0BhovWUjSQ&s=19
“Democracy” has become a CIA buzzword (like the word “disinformation”) to allow the administrative state (i.e. the “deep state”) to influence and control our election to ensue that only aligned politicians get into office. Trump is a threat to these “aligned” interests.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/AtlRey/status/1737484153543631359?t=Sf76WaT8gtpwGX4C4AMcsg&s=19
Anti-Trumpers: Trump is unelectable!
Anti-Trumpers: Remove him from ballot.
Make that make sense.
Well, it is one way to make him unelectable.
Unless you have a progressive brain, with level 10 cognitive dissonance powers, you can never understand.
Or, they just lie.
Chicago’s Democratic Party mayor echoing that of his NYC counterpart. Turns out sanctuary cities want the moniker but not the headaches or price tag. No matter who, keep voting blue.
Yep. Mayor BJ is whining about it.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cry-victim-chicago-mayor-rages-over-buses-immigrants-texas
The biggest supporters of open borders are those who don't bear the cost. Such as idiots from Maine (specifically sarc, not Chumby)
"In reality, the political left is the favored movement of the establishment and they are only ever victims of their own incompetence, lust for power and delusions of grandeur."
Call it the spoiled 13 year-old girl princess syndrome.
https://twitter.com/TheRealZBlog/status/1737464315496530139?t=QySSny8LdFMhZ-C2yGg8mw&s=19
Nudge theory has been popular with the managerial class for a long time now. It lets elites believe that they are not using hard power to impose their morality on society, but instead they are helping history along in its inevitable course.
[Link]
You know who else thought history has an inevitable course?
Jack Nicklaus?
!
The Elder Edda's? The Book of Revelation in The Holy Bible? Al-Qu'ran?
Some of these people could use a hard nudge off a short pier.
Christmas is not about plastic shiny crap. Christmas is ruined by consumerism.
The issues with the ME is partially due to an ineffective administration in Washington. Gas prices at the pump were one third lower just three years ago.
Cue the cries of “rig count”!
"Christmas is ruined by consumerism."
Thank you, Charlie Brown.
To be fair, consumerism was ruined by Christmas. What could be a more rational pattern of buying consumer goods, spread across the year, has become an insane boom-bust frenzy that distorts both commerce and human behavior.
So, there.
The early Christians could have left well enough alone and kept Jesus's birth in September (where it is suspected of having been) instead of moving it to the solstice celebration.
It helped to convert the pagans. Keeping the tree may be part of that too. Orthodox Christians celebrate this holiday in early January.
I don't think you even see Christmas trees become a thing until well into the Renaissance era, when a merchant and guild middle class had become more prominent in European society. Peasants and feudal lords would have found the idea of cutting down a tree for the house and putting presents around it to be completely fucking absurd.
No, all Orthodox Christians celebrate Christmas on December 25th.
It's just that a subset of the Orthodox Churches (Georgia, Jerusalem, Macedonia, Russia, Serbia) still use the Julian calendar to decide when December 25th is, instead of the Gregorian calendar.
Which falls in early January using the calendar that 99.8% of the people in the comments use.
The early Christians could have left well enough alone
and kept Jesus’s birth in September (where it is suspected of having been) instead of moving it to the solstice celebration.by making life on Earth better here and now instead of looking for Pie-In-Thr-Sky-In-The-Sweet-By-And-By.FTFY
🙂
😉
It really fucks up personal budgets, too. As you indicated, gifts that might be given through the year are concentrated in one spending frenzy over the course of a few weeks that can take months to pay down.
The last guys who did anything about Red Sea piracy are the Russians. The only thing Biden would do is accept all the Houthis as refugees.
RE: Colorado and Trump.
Title IX comes to national elections.
Because due process and all other democratic norms can't be trusted to achieve democratic purity. And because we must trust our betters to always do what is right and necessary to protect the ideals they cherish most.
"Trust the gurus and the wizards, they're the experts and you're not."
Exactly.
— Lying Jeffy
"Hell Nawl can't do dis," say the texts, as well as the oh-so-eloquent "get an abortion lol."
Whaaaaaaaaat?
You mean straight men who aggressively promote abortion might not actually care about "choice," but instead are stereotypical frat bros who just want to crush as much consequence-free pussy as possible?
My world has been shattered. 🙁
#JossWhedonRule
Kobe Bryant had to pay and he didn’t even get that gold digger preggers.
Back in 1993, Snoop Dogg warned the playa class about this in Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang.
Pfff! '93?!
And mother always told me, "Be careful of who you love
And be careful of what you do (Oh-oh)
'Cause the lie becomes the truth" (Oh-oh), hey-ey
Ok Boomer.
I’m not familiar with Lawrence Welk.
Lawrence Welk wore one glove and offered little kids "Jesus Juice"?
Wunnerful, wunnerful.
Minnesota Timberwolves player Anthony Edwards made headlines this week because he allegedly wired a model $100,000 to pay for her abortion
Christ, even abortion procedures are suffering from inflation spikes these days.
That baby is safer than money in a Swiss bank.
Speaking of athletes going for the high score:
Miami Dolphins superstar Tyreek Hill fathered kids with three different women in the space of four months – and now one baby mama is rushing to his defense.
I like to think of Anthony Edwards as the Biden administration in this situation, and his bitch as the social media companies.
He was just asking nicely.
he was just expecting her to do her patriotic duty to him
https://twitter.com/Doc_0/status/1737461624112349520?t=a1dMtm5LAbCsdh9l4dhUgg&s=19
They don't think the GOP has the guts to weaponize this against them, and between this stuff and Biden's open borders, they don't think they're ever going to lose power again.
"Democrats are dumb to set a precedent that their political opposition can weaponize and they should greatly fear loss of virtue in said opposition."
What if we imported more Eastern Europeans, include actual Ukrainians?
I doubt the GOP will play hardball back at them. Too many want to protect the "norms" they eschew.
Maybe. Paxton's already signaling that he'll do something similar to Biden in Texas, probably using the failure to protect the borders as the justification.
As I said above, the justification, of course, is irrelevant to the actual issue that citizens are being told by the state whom they can and can't vote for. And like they always do, the left and center-right exercise no future-time orientation on their actions, because what is going on right now is meeting their objective of the current moment.
"and, well, if your Christmas packages don't get here in time, it's possibly the Houthi militants' fault"
My local post office, at risk of running out of excuses for the shitty service they provide, thanks you.
Why the EU is coming for Musk.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/12/19/why-the-eu-is-coming-for-elon-musk/
When Mary Poppins turns out to be more like Nurse Ratched.
the only thing i'm surprised about is that they havent tried to imprison or arrest him yet.
some kind of rape allegations must be getting cooked up as we speak. maybe they can get the swedish chicks who lied about assange to do the job
the only thing i’m surprised about is that they havent tried to imprison or arrest him yet.
They can't, because he's still a made man. If they did try putting him in prison, they'd lose the entire means they have of getting their surveillance satellites into space. They could ask Bezos, but who the fuck knows how long it would take for Amazon to get military-grade boosters ready. The west's military supply chains are already extraordinarily precarious as it is.
This is their way of trying to get permission from the head of the outfit to whack him.
There's also a bit of a sticky wicket with EVs after the Big 3 and others have laid out how, unless you're bilking the upper crust of the first world and covering it with tax breaks, you're essentially losing money on every unit shipped.
Correct, especially when you're charging $85K or more for an EV like the Ford Lightning while dumbfuck states like Colorado are implementing minimum inventory laws that over 80% of a car dealer's new sales lot needs to consist of EVs by 2032. And range limits are still applicable here, as the real-world range on the batteries is actually smaller than what's claimed--massively so, in some cases.
Hold on. This is weird. Reason's official DNC rep told us his party has no time for nonsense like reparations for slavery, and that only the GOP cares about it.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signs controversial legislation to create slavery reparations commission
#DefendDemocratsAtAllCosts
Just thinking about proper reparations.
If some of the most heinous treatment of slaves occurred when white plantation owners raped black slave women, what is the best way to atone for this oppression?
I love how the actual people who sold the slaves initially never get any condemnation.
I wonder how they intend to identify people who were enslaved under the laws of New York.
I know Reason is pro Nikki, but vivek had the best reply to Colorado last night. Not amash or Meijer.
===
Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
This is what an *actual* attack on democracy looks like: in an un-American, unconstitutional, and *unprecedented* decision, a cabal of Democrat judges are barring Trump from the ballot in Colorado. Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in this election, the bipartisan Establishment is now deploying a new tactic to bar him from ever holding office again: the 14th Amendment. I pledge to *withdraw* from the Colorado GOP primary unless Trump is also allowed to be on the state’s ballot, and I demand that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to do the same immediately - or else they are tacitly endorsing this illegal maneuver which will have disastrous consequences for our country.
Today’s decision is the latest election interference tactic to silence political opponents and swing the election for whatever puppet the Democrats put up this time by depriving Americans of the right to vote for their candidate of choice.
The 14th Amendment was part of the “Reconstruction Amendments” that were ratified following the Civil War. It was passed to prohibit former Confederate military and political leaders from holding high federal or state office. These men had clearly taken part in a rebellion against the United States: the Civil War. That makes it all the more absurd that a left-wing group in Colorado is asking a federal court to disqualify the 45th President on the same grounds, equating his speech to rebellion against the United States.
And there’s another legal problem: Trump is not a former “officer of the United States,” as that term is used in the Constitution, meaning Section 3 does not apply. As the Supreme Court explained in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010), an “officer of the United States” is someone appointed by the President to aid him in his duties under Article II, Section 2. The term does not apply to elected officials, and certainly not to the President himself.
The Framers of the 14th Amendment would be appalled to see this narrow provision—intended to bar former U.S. officials who switched to the Confederacy from seeking public office—being weaponized by a sitting President and his political allies to prevent a former President from seeking reelection. Our country is becoming unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.
Was a good response.
Bingo. This should be easily overturned by the USSC, but I fear that the damage has already been done. What's to stop another state from trying it under a different approach?
Hmm, how about entire political parties that switched from supporting the Confederacy?
Our country is becoming unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.
It's not recognizable to me.
Having tried every trick in the book to eliminate President Trump from running in this election, the bipartisan Establishment is now deploying a new tactic to bar him from ever holding office again
And he's right that this is a bipartisan establishment effort--the legal team is headed by liberal political operative Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics from DC, along with ex-GOP NeverTrumper and current Democrat Mario Nicolais, and the plaintiffs are Colorado ex-GOP NeverTrumpers Krista Kafer, Norma Anderson, Michelle Priola, and Chris Castilian.
Before I know exactly how to feel about the issue, I'm going to need Nardz to find a Tweet delineating exactly how the backstabbing, anti-white Jewish conspiracy was involved.
Houthis Ruin Christmas
This is very bad for Cindy-Lou Houthi.
LOL
love this.
+1
No Roast Halal Beast or even a can of Houthi Hash?
🙂
😉
reports CNN,
I always wonder if this thing even happened if CNN is saying it's so.
Only 6 months later when the Conspiracy! has been accepted by official media.
"in a 4–3 ruling, the Colorado high court determined that Trump's role in instigating the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol was sufficient to bar him from the presidency." Note that Trump has been convicted of no insurrection-related crimes.
Wait, what?
IOW, the Democrats on Colorado's highest court decided to remove a competitor from the ballot, in the style of a banana republic.
But... January 6 WAS an insurrection. Trust the science!
You have to admit, it was cleverly disguised as a mostly peaceful protest.
There may have been more insurrection observers present than insurrectionists plus protesters.
"I made comments in the heat of a moment that are not me, and that are not aligned with what I believe and who I want to be as a man.
He's a progressive.
Fun side note: As Iowahawk once said, when someone apologizes by saying "this is not who I am"... it is exactly who they are.
Just like that twink staffer saying he'd never disrespect his workplace, after using the Senate chamber as the setting for a Pornhub video.
"...which prohibits those who have engaged "in insurrection or rebellion against" the government from holding office,..."
1) There was no "insurrection"; it was a protest.
2) Trump hasn't yet won, so "holding office" is not yet an issue.
3) We can hope TDS is a fatal disease; a lot of TDS-addled shits need to die.
Colorado’s Supreme Court ruled late last night that Donald Trump is not eligible to seek the presidency
Trump's enemies are doing all the things they keep warning us he will do if he wins.
"I don't want to hit you, baby, but you just make me so crazy sometimes."
David Harsanyi
@davidharsanyi
Nothing says "democracy" quite like throwing people off ballots for crimes they haven't been convicted of
Harsanyi needs to have a chat with Krista Kafer, his former colleague at the Independence Institute, about that.
Totally not election interference.
Note that Trump has been convicted of no insurrection-related crimes.
Neither has anyone else. It's all a sham pretense to attack their enemies and everyone knows it.
>A paper company in Guangdong, China, is saying that "employees need to clock 62 miles every month if they want to get an annual bonus worth 130% of their monthly salary," and that they will be eligible for "an annual bonus equivalent to a month's salary if they ran 31 miles every month."
That's . . . an incredibly stupid incentive structure.
1. Its easy to run 31 miles in a month - one a day - and you get a month's bonus.
2. Its more than twice as hard to run 62 miles a month, you're running twice as far, and you only get 130%? No one's gonna take this option.
Except that a lot of people already run more than 2 miles every day. For them, this is "free money".
Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like somebody hit Agammamon in the head with a bag of hammers or something.
Nowhere does it say "run" and, personally, as someone who hasn't run a full mile in decades, I wouldn't call back-to-back 15-min.-miles a *run*, and, (making some assumptions about Chinese paper factories) I already signed on for 100% of my pay for 40 hours a week, 130% of my pay for 43.5 hrs. a week is still a bonus, even if it's not as good a bonus as running 62 mi. in two days or whatever.
>>I wouldn’t call back-to-back 15-min.-miles a *run*
two 4.0 walked miles.
stupid nonedit ... which mme dillinger will tell you is a run bc her shorty legs but is really barely a brisk walk
I suspect not a lot of urban Chinese actually run more than 1/100th of a mile a day. Especially not workers in a paper factory.
I agree that the whole thing sounds a bit I think the, potentially, missing key is the rest of the week/work week. If they're already expected to pull 90 hour weeks, this is pretty brutal.
It's like your employer paying you to walk between half and the entirety of your lunch hour.
I could understand if you really liked lunch and thought the idea was stupid, but the idea that it's stupid because people can't possibly eat all their meals for a month in two days is just you being retarded.
A mile a day is almost impossible NOT to do in a country where you can't get a car.
For the workers that fail to meet this goal, does management ream them out?
It's when the sheet hits the fan.
That’s a portrait of the current landscape.
The letter of the tabloid.
Out of curiosity, what happens if Joe Biden wins the DNC nomination, then croaks, say, Oct 15th or so.
Ballots cannot legally be changed, I think, so do Democrats vote to elect a dead person President (which is different than dead Democrats voting for President). Would the VP candidate get to subsume the Presidency on a victory? Are votes for a dead person even valid? Or what if he wins, but dies before taking office in January?
I'd have to guess that since technically Presidential ballots are for Electors and not actually for the candidate, the system would work itself out in the Electoral College, since the Electors have some freedom to vote.
What if he wins, Electoral College meets and confirms the election, but then he dies before either he or his VP are sworn in? Certainly Harris as the current VP becomes President until Jan 20, but then what? Hmm, 20th seems to cover that " If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President-elect shall have died, the Vice President-elect shall become President."
Out of curiosity, what happens if Joe Biden wins the DNC nomination, then croaks, say, Oct 15th or so.
Kamala continues the campaign and she's our next president.
And you thought Biden press conferences were a deep-dive into verbal retardation...
James Lindsay has said that Kamala's ditzy politician act is just that, a smokescreen to make people think she isn't as ruthless as she really is. He points out that she's a former prosecutor, and that she talks in these nonsensical word salads to garble the communism she's actually spewing.
I'm not sure how accurate that assessment is, but I do think there's something to the assertion that she's not nearly as dimwitted as people think she is. She was smart enough to use her boyfriend to advance her political career, after all.
If there is one thing Asian revenge dramas have taught me, it's that someone can be an utter idiot and ruthless at the same time. It typically happens when someone's power was acquired due to a relationship (parent/spouse/lover) with someone who earned it.
So, that tracks.
If there is one thing Asian revenge dramas have taught me, it’s that someone can be an utter idiot and ruthless at the same time. It typically happens when someone’s power was acquired due to a relationship (parent/spouse/lover) with someone who earned it.
Jesus, considering Jiang Qing, talk about art imitating life.
I saw that. It's an interesting take, and there's probably some truth to it. She can't be that much of a dingbat.
It wouldn't be the first time in recent history the dems elected a dead guy - https://www.abc27.com/pennsylvania/late-pennsylvania-state-rep-tony-deluca-wins-re-election-one-month-after-passing/
Eric Adams gives the worst answer any politician has ever given to a soft ball question.
While the answer was terrible, it's not even close to the worst.
"What is an Aleppo?" still has to be pretty near the top and above Adams' response. Biden, Psaki, and Jean-Pierre generated worse responses on a daily basis, up to and including reading canned answers to questions not asked. Also, while not as platitudinous and their role as politicians dubious, James Clapper, Anthony Fauci, and a few others have given worse answers that politicians have gone on to regurgitate as fact.
"You can keep your doctor"
100% safe and effective .
"Usually briefs."
Hey, Johnson was just exhausted after campaigning in all of Obama's 57 states.
R. Budd Dwyer's answer to his own rhetorical question of "Why bother?" was pretty bad.
A friend thinks Smith & Wesson should offer a Budd Dwyer commemorative revolver that comes packaged in a manilla envelope.
I was chipping golf balls behind my house.
OJ Simpson, still not a Jew.
>>You've heard of the Grinch, but what about the Houthis?
always promised to come for the Sunday people too.
>>"get an abortion lol."
wonder if Anthony Edwards talk to me goose asked his mom if anyone ever said this to her.
>>This is a place where every day you wake up, you could experience everything from a plane crashing into our Trade Center ...
expectation damages if I go there and this does not take place?
>>Biden family, who can't seem to figure out how to pay the IRS what they owe.
they know how they don't fucking care.
The Houthi movement arose in the 90s as an opposition force to Ali Abdullah Saleh, who ruled as the democratically elected leader of Yemen for over 20 years. The elections were all free and fair, too.
In reality, he was a dictator the US propped up, and now the opposition to him is causing logistical headaches for the state of Israel as it tries to carry out genocide in peace.
Trust Reason to twist the fuck out of a relatively simple story and literally try to pin Christmas woe on a reactionary political force that only exists because of US meddling in the domestic politics of Yemen.
"...causing logistical headaches for the state of Israel as it tries to carry out genocide in peace...
Eat shit and die, antisemitic asshole.
attacking cargo ships perfect response to grievances.
The Houthi's have been firing rockets and drones at Israel for months now without a peep from Reason. A threat to the timely arrival of Christmas goodies, and the story is front and center.
the Houthi's are Brandon's pet I'm shocked we're even hearing about these rockets
I'm shocked that someone in these pages thinks Brandon is running the show.
Hopefully Israel will actually commit genocide this time. Palestinians are garbage. Actually, so are the Houthi.
Fuck 'em all.
Got to hand it to Israel. Committing genocide fairly easy against a population confined to a concentration camp without an army, navy or air force. Committing the genocide while getting the US to pay for it, as well as funding Israel's socialized medicine and education requires a master stroke of propaganda.
is palestine a race?
Is garbage a race?
Nah, they're just Arabs who colonized the place a while back.
That "concentration camp" has a border with Egypt. How many have crossed over into Egypt to avoid the genocide?
It's not Egypt who is perpetrating genocide, cheered on by Biden and the ghouls at Reason. If Israels want to 'avoid the genocide,' they can easily do so without Egypt lifting a finger.
Who's your favorite Nazi, misconstrueman?
"Who’s your favorite Nazi, misconstrueman?"
I'm glad you asked. It's Herman Goring. For the same reason why Richard Nixon is my favorite president. Someone whose life story and personality is worthy of a Shakespearean drama. The science fiction author Jose Philip Farmer evidently agrees, as Goring figures prominently in the Riverworld series.
Who's your favorite? Or are you still on the fence?
Goering would certainly agree with your posts about Israel.
No, the Nazis were quite happy with the idea of Jews living in Israel. SS officials like Eichmann and Heydrich schemed for years to facilitate the transfer of German Jews to British occupied Palestine.
You're evidently not familiar with the Haavara Agreement:
"The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הֶסְכֵּם הַעֲבָרָה Translit.: heskem haavara Translated: "transfer agreement") was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist German Jews signed on 25 August 1933. The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany. It was a major factor in making possible the migration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine between 1933 and 1939.[1]"
Goering would absolutely agree with this:
"Got to hand it to Israel. Committing genocide fairly easy against a population confined to a concentration camp without an army, navy or air force. Committing the genocide while getting the US to pay for it, as well as funding Israel’s socialized medicine and education requires a master stroke of propaganda."
"Goering would absolutely agree with this"
Because it's true. For that matter, neither you or anyone else commenting here has disputed my comment.
Today I learned that the "m" in "mtrueman" stands for "Misek".
Interesting how Sarcasmic and Jeff are barking everywhere that Trump is Hitler, while all their other coreligionists like mtrueman are busy being antisemitic.
"Today I learned that the “m” in “mtrueman” stands for “Misek”.
Interesting how Sarcasmic and Jeff are barking everywhere that Trump is Hitler, while all their other coreligionists like mtrueman are busy being antisemitic."
Ad hominem from the get go. Not even an attempt to counter the points I made. You are another intellectual and moral coward without the stones to make your case. Fucking pathetic.
My favorite Nazi is one that's six feet under.
If the Palestinians surrendered, there would be peace. If the Israeli's surrendered, they would be massacred.
Speaking of master strokes of propaganda.... Any word on the headless babies?
You're now denying that children were killed in Oct 7th attack? Your favorite nazi would indeed be cheering you on.
Did you ever get to the bottom of that "too many high ranking IDF casualties" mystery you posted the other day?
"You’re now denying that children were killed in Oct 7th attack?"
Now you're against killing babies? A fine genocidalist you would make. Stick with the 'Palestinians are garbage' and other school yard taunts.
"“too many high ranking IDF casualties”
Too many? Aren't you mistaking me for somebody else?
You posted an entire Israeli casualty list and said it was top heavy with colonels and sergeants. Just wondering if you ever figured it out.
" Just wondering if you ever figured it out."
Apparently they only became sergeants and colonels after they were killed. Or something.
So you don't buy that as an explanation?
I do not. The Palestinian militants took several Israeli bases and command centers by surprise. Hubris can be such a bummer.
But they have a potential exit into Egypt - I'm asking why they don't use it.
"I’m asking why they don’t use it."
The Egyptians are hoping for a ceasefire. As I write this, Hamas officials are in Egypt discussing a ceasefire. It's much easier than forceably transferring millions of starving people to tent cities in the Sinai desert.
Instead of asking me all these questions, you should take the trouble to read some books and educate yourself. I hope you've brushed up on the Haavara Agreement, next is Egypt's long running Sinai Insurgency. I assume you know nothing of this. Educate yourself. Egypt is the last place that would want to add millions of radicalized Palestinians to the insurgency in Sinai. The Palestinians are Israel's problem. They can come to a political settlement, or they can exterminate. This attempt to blame Egypt for Israel's genocidal actions is one more example of your falling for Israel's ridiculous and ill informed propaganda.
The palestinians themselves are to blame for Israel's actions, since they elected and continue to support a party with the stated purpose of wiping out jews. Egypt could have taken the palestinians in as fellow arabs, but refuses to do so, for the reason you finally admitted to.
Israel has tried many times to come to a settlement with the palestinians, and in return they got literal rape and pillage. They also get Goering fans such as yourself who describe their self-defense as genocide.
"The palestinians themselves are to blame for Israel’s actions"
Again with Israeli propaganda. I've heard this before. Those responsible for 'Israel's actions' are Israelis themselves. And their American enablers/paymasters.
"since they elected and continue to support a party with the stated purpose of wiping out jews."
Given your gullibility and general ignorance, I imagine you believe all that. In fact Israeli politicians fostered and promoted Hamas as a foil to Fatah, the faction now 'in charge' of the West Bank. Hamas and the Israeli right shared an opposition to the two state solution, (something that Fatah favored, also PM Rabin until he was gunned down by a Netanyahu fanboy.) The enemy of my enemy is my friend went the logic. Only months ago, Netanyahu was transferring suitcases of cash surreptitiously to Hamas, every month for years.
"At a 2019 Likud party conference, Politico noted, Netanyahu said, "Anyone who wants to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state needs to support strengthening Hamas."
Do you really think Israelis fear that Hamas will one day emerge from their tunnels and exterminate the lot them? They clearly don't. Still, it's a good talking point for the useful idiots, and genocide apologists.
The only ones to keep breaking the ceasefires are the Palestinians.
Take your antisemetic apologia and join Herr Misek.
"The only ones to keep breaking the ceasefires are the Palestinians."
The only ones that aren't happy with the status quo are the Palestinians. If Israelis want a permanent peace with their neighbors, drop the genocide, and apartheid. Until then, expect the resistance to continue. Expecting the Palestinians to accept their second class status is naive and flies in the face of over 70 years of history.
"Take your antisemetic apologia and join Herr Misek."
What would Gresham's law have to say about watering down the word to mean any criticism of Israel, wearing a checkered scarf, calling for a ceasefire, attending a peace rally. It will only hurt Jews world wide in the long run, and your giving a shit about Jews is nothing but a pose, playing to the peanut gallery.
The elections were all free and fair, too.
And you know this how? because you were told this?
The Houthi movement arose in the 90s as an opposition force to Ali Abdullah Saleh, who ruled as the democratically elected leader of Yemen for over 20 years. The elections were all free and fair, too.
So besides targeting random merchant ships, they're an insurrectionist danger to democracy, too. Sounds like a nice bunch.
causing logistical headaches for the state of Israel
No such thing is happening. The vast majority of Israels trade goes through its Mediterranean ports. Egypt is going to bear the brunt of the Houthi's attempts to disrupt world trade, as the Suez canal makes up a large chunk of its economy.
a relatively simple story
It is indeed a simple story. Goat fucking terrorists shout Allah Akbar as they try to destroy the west with any means they have until they are violently stopped.
"Sounds like a nice bunch."
Nice bunches don't win wars.
"Aliyah's Snackbar!"
The Houthi movement arose in the 90s as an opposition force to Ali Abdullah Saleh, who ruled as the democratically elected leader of Yemen for over 20 years. The elections were all free and fair, too.
In reality, he was a dictator the US propped up, and now the opposition to him is causing logistical headaches for the state of Israel as it tries to carry out genocide in peace.
So which was Ali Abdullah Saleh? He can't be both under Aristotelian Syllogistic Logic...Or do you practice Aryan Pure Superman Polylogic where the moving of "The Blood" determines "Aryan Truth"?
That might explain why you think Israel's war for survival is genocidal.
Why don't you follow your fellow Sheeple and take "a.heroic.dose" of either Nytol or Zyklon B and "Get Your Zzzs" permanently!
1995 Nytol Quick Caps "Will help you get your Zzzs" TV Commercial
https://youtu.be/JCurGbeD0KA?si=GfVQdbTyL_RvZXib
Reason - has snarky remark on a state supreme court acting like a kangaroo court in a banana republic and terrorist pirates attacking free enterprise, doesn't really cover Boston mayor normalizing segregation.
But anything potentially bad happens to foreign nationals in the country - "this is attack on democracy itself, brrrrr"
Haviv Rettig Gur on the origins of Israel and the conflict in the Middle East.
Interesting but a couple big holes imo.
First, I understand Gur's splitting Ashkenaz into two groups - those who fled/emigrated to the US (and are easily the dominant population of Jews here) and those who stayed and suffered through the violence of ethnic European nationalism until DP camps in 1947. There's also a psychology about each experience but in understanding Israel (v simply mythologizing it) how is it better than the 1960 film Exodus?
Because it's a third group - European Jews who emigrated to Palestine very early on - that imo formed Israel from the kernel of a Zionist idea. They are nearly 100% of all PM's of Israel (Yair Lapid's father is the exception) - maybe half of all Ashkenaz in Israel. They turned the basic Zionist idea (Jewish and democratic state) into an ethnic nationalism that is as exclusionary as the European form they fled. That is the source of the Naqba and that ethnic nationalism is becoming even more so with the Israeli right wing now (see 2018 Nationality Bill).
And on the Palestinian side, it is ludicrous that Gur seems to think that the Palestinians were all a-ok until someone started reading Frantz Fanon and studying Algeria in the 1960's. Is 'real people's experience' only applicable to one side?
So, per the AP article Liz linked on assembling a force:
So, my question is, what the hell is wrong with the Biden Administration?
1) Biden
2) Harris
3) The people that Biden appointed
4) The people that support Biden
Can't say for sure, but the Biden regime (and the Obama administration before it) always seemed hesitant to upset Iran.
Normally, their gut reaction would be to bomb these asshats back to the bronze age.
But it seems like these guys never left it.
" On Monday Austin did not answer a question as to why the Pentagon had not conducted a counterstrike."
Perhaps it has conducted a counterstrike.