The Florida Barrier Reef's Last Stand
Summer heat this year posed an existential threat to the world's third-largest barrier reef.

The race to save the only barrier reef in the U.S. hit a major setback this summer when a heat wave turned the waters off the Florida Keys into a Jacuzzi.
The Florida Reef Tract is used to weathering warm water during fall months, but unseasonably hot water arrived this summer, meaning those coral colonies had to endure months of extreme water temperatures. A buoy off Florida recorded 101-degree water temperatures this July. When corals are stressed by hot or cold water, they lose their color—a result of expelling algae that provides corals with most of their energy—and eventually die.
Throughout the summer and into early October, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coral Reef Watch program placed the Florida Keys under a coral bleaching Alert Level 2, meaning significant bleaching is expected with likely mortality.
The bleaching was heartbreaking for researchers and volunteers trying to save the reefs—and an existential threat to the third-largest barrier reef in the world. Over the past 50 years, 97 percent of the Florida Reef Tract's historical cover has died due to overlapping environmental pressures: pollution, bleaching events, and disease.
In 2019, NOAA, which has authority over the protected waters inside the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, launched Mission: Iconic Reefs, a 20-year plan to try to restore seven of the most notable reefs by growing and outplanting roughly 500,000 corals back onto them.
To accomplish this, NOAA is relying on several ocean nonprofits, such as Mote Marine Laboratory, Reef Renewal USA, and the Coral Restoration Foundation (CRF), as well as a large network of private aquariums. The CRF maintains large underwater nurseries where it grows critically endangered staghorn and elkhorn corals. Part of the researchers' work is selecting corals that are more resistant to heat and disease. Because coral can reproduce asexually as well as through sexual reproduction, hardy phenotypes can be split into fragments and regrown as identical clones.
Mote Marine Laboratory also recently started a breeding program to reintroduce the Caribbean king crab to the coral reefs. Animals like crabs and urchins are important grazer species that keep coral reefs from being smothered by fast-growing algae.
But when the heat wave hit the Keys this summer, staff had to frantically retrieve thousands of those coral samples and transport them to above-ground nurseries before they were cooked to death. One nursery near Looe Key was a total loss. The results could be equally dire for the over 100,000 coral fragments already planted back on the reefs.
If the reefs collapsed completely, it would be disastrous for the Florida Keys. According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the reefs in Southeast Florida are valued at $8.5 billion and sustain 70,000 full- and part-time jobs. The barrier reef also protects the Keys from hurricanes and major storms by soaking up wave action.
But while the news is grim, it's also a testament to the ingenuity of the research groups and their passionate volunteers. Mote Marine Laboratory runs a volunteer-driven program called BleachWatch, where boaters and divers can submit bleaching reports and photos from their own observations of local reefs. This gives scientists an early warning system for bleaching in the Florida Keys.
Reason attended a volunteer orientation session for the BleachWatch program in August, followed by a dive with I.CARE, a local coral restoration nonprofit. I.CARE has an outplanting site that sits in deeper water than most, and the corals there were still thriving. Volunteer divers carefully scraped algae away from the tiny pieces of coral with steel brushes, giving them the best chance possible for survival.
When the water finally cools down, they will come back with more coral—and hope that future generations will be able to see a thriving reef.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A single location is never the sign that alarmists want it to be.
https://qz.com/1180919/coral-reefs-thrive-despite-global-warming-say-scientists-with-3d-images-from-scripps-institution-of-oceanography
The environment is never static. Stop using it as a sign of catastrophe.
Trying to save this reef while the planet is naturally warming is like trying to save Haley’s nomination chances when that party is naturally looking elsewhere.
Surely all these FL bad articles are helping swing it her way.
Did the article start by saying 97% was already gone, but losing the last 3% would be catastrophic?
That don't make no sense.
Leave the damn environment alone.
I spent a week in the USVI earlier this year, and the reefs have been gone for 5 years. A friend told me this was all due to ocean warming, but talking with the park rangers there revealed that in fact they were mostly destroyed by several Cat 5s that came through over the past 5 years.
We used to dive in Hawaii at one of the most beautiful reef systems in the world and it was completely paved over by lava in the 2019 volcano eruption.
We are coming to learn that, despite their rocky appearance, reefs are relatively transient. Many atols wouldn't exist except for the fact that reef locations move out and in, and grow and die off.
No! Everything has to stay the way it is right now forever no matter what!
Well, except for any forests that need to be flattened to make room for toxic chemical dumps contained in solar panels.
Or eagle killing wind farms.
^This and more.
Lots of fantastic shots you see of colorful reefs have fuck all to do with Florida. The Florida reefs have always been hideous Elk Horn and Stag Horn corals which are as colorful as... Elk and Stag horns. What is colorful about the reefs of Florida are the fauna that live on the coral, like the colorful parrotfish (which is colored and has a beak like a parrot) that actually eats the coral and digests out the algae. Other places, other creatures like anemones (which kill the coral under their footprint) are what people ooh and aah over in the color photographs.
I've long said that anybody saying "coral reef X is over 1,000 yrs. old" is effectively saying the same thing as "London or Rome or Dresden is over 1,000 yrs. old" even though they've been firebombed, burned down, abandoned, paved over, and rebuilt multiple times over the 1,000+ yrs. and generally nobody gave or gives a shit about 99% of the purely-functional architecture that was destroyed as long as the 1% of paintings, palaces, and chapels didn't get burned down or blown up.
Yes but the category five was caused by the Jones act, so...
I've scuba dived since I was a kid. Every coral reef in the world where I've been has deteriorated sharply over my lifetime. Especially the last 20-25 years. The Red Sea is apparently the only reef system that has corals that can thrive in current/warmer waters.
Anyone who thinks corals worldwide are 'transient' is a blithering idiot. Todays reefs are overall maybe 5,000 years old. So they can withstand some% of damage each year. But the coral/algae symbiosis has been around for 200+ million years and only the dinosaur extinction resulted in as significant a species loss event as today. 1/4 of marine species use/require coral reefs for at least part of their life and 1 billion people depend on them for their fishing.
25 years ago maybe there was reason to be concerned about their future. But that was always futile and is now long past. They won't die in my life - but in my kids life the change towards algae, slime and jellyfish will happen.
What are you suggesting? The oceans have warmed MAYBE .5 degrees F in the past 40 years. Are you suggesting everywhere you scuba dive has been destroyed by .5 degrees F? Is so I call bullshit.
https://psmag.com/environment/more-coral-more-problems
The obligatory article that says warming is causing more coral growth which again, is problematic.
Everything is a crisis, all the time.
"Anyone who thinks corals worldwide are ‘transient’ is a blithering idiot."
Anyone who listens to JFear is moreso. JFear loves nothing more than to spout confidently about shit that he knows nothing about. This is especially true when it comes to Climate Change and he makes stupid statements based solely on eyeballing graphs (incorrectly) and thinking it makes himself an expert.
For the record, we know for a fact that in many places we have looked there are signs of ancient coral reefs- thousands to millions of years old that are dead. They didn't die because of our addiction to SUVs, they have died because coral have adapted to thrive in very specific convergences of depth, sunlight and water temperature- and those convergence points move over time.
Is this the same noaa that has been caught falsifying evidence in the past?
It's definitely the same Jesse.
Glad the Florida Story box got checked by six in the AM.
No, that's bullshit.
The reefs have survived worldwide for hundreds of millions of years, including regenerating themselves when sea levels dropped hundreds of feet just, what, 20,000 years ago, and then rose again 10,000 years ago as glaciation increased and decreased. They survived hotter periods than today and colder ones.
They aren't in any kind of existential crisis.
All those Pacific coral atolls which were going to be flooded into non-existence? Yeah, they're coral, and they've increased in size over the last several decades.
Stop drinking the climate catastrophe alarmunism kool aid. It's even dumber than TDS.
+1
It’s even dumber than TDS.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
TDS is dumb enough without asking for more- Mar A Lago isn't famed for its snorkeling.
Serious coral restoration is so labor intensive that It takes money in private island quantities
But ... but ... but ... invasive species! climate change! global warming! species extinction! human blight on momma Gaea! C'mon, guys! Get into lockstep with the proletariat!
Why not just do the whole Animatrix blot out the sun thing to lower global temperatures and save the coral reefs?
Wow, this article is so stupid I thought for sure Ron wrote it.
Damn, I thought I was the only one thinking that!
Coral bleaching is a thoroughly debunked "danger". Yes, the corals expel their symbiotic algae - and then pull in new ones. It's part of the adaptation process. Australian reefs that the media were touting is "dead" just a few years ago were back to normal almost before the ink on the stories was dry.
If your ambition is to be a science writer, you really need to study the science part.
That goes double for those who aspire to be science readers.
And this rather reminds me of Ron DeSantis.
The science library at Guantanamo leaves a lot to be desired.
Another ignorant, fear mongering article, claiming the end of the world because of coral bleaching.
Such climate catastrophe BS is for simpleton Lefties.
"A buoy off Florida recorded 101-degree water temperatures this July."
Where was this buoy? How far off Florida? It wouldn't have been in a near-shore estuary, would it?
Manatee Bay, Everglades national park.
Here's why it's more than anecdotal:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwRTw_7NNJs
So, in other words, not off the Florida coast, but rather in shallow and largely enclosed water not the least bit representative of ocean temperatures.
RE, youtube. Given that oceanic temperature coverage was practically nonexistent until, at most, 50 years ago, how does NASA have any earthly idea of temperatures, within a tenth of a degree, before the 1970s? Sounds like shenanigans.
So Reason, like King Knut, is standing on the beach with arms outstretched trying to hold back the tide? Could it get any sillier than this? Unspoken in this article and all the other nonsense about heartbreak and "researchers" is why anyone cares who doesn't have a direct stake in the few billions of dollars and the few thousand "full and part-time jobs" that depends on the barrier reefs.