Tesla's Expensive New Cybertruck May Qualify for $7,500 in E.V. Tax Credits
According to a Treasury Department website, two of the three Cybertruck models currently offered would qualify for tax credits.

In late November, Tesla Motors delivered the first 10 Cybertrucks to customers, over four years after it was first unveiled as a concept prototype and two years after it was originally supposed to begin production. The odd, angular electric vehicle with a stainless steel exterior attempts to marry Tesla-style sports car performance with the rugged function of a pickup truck. The Wall Street Journal characterized it as "a giant, steel triangle on wheels."
Depending on options, the Cybertruck can achieve 600–845 horsepower and cost between $60,000–$100,000—clearly making it a luxury purchase and not for the shopper on a budget.
So why, then, do some models qualify for federal tax credits?
As part of President Joe Biden's pledge to transition the U.S. to greener sources of energy, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) established $7,500 tax credits for purchases of electric vehicles (E.V.s).
"Working families will be able to use tax credits that make electric vehicles more affordable," brags the White House's Clean Energy webpage. "Purchasing an electric vehicle (EV) can save families thousands of dollars on fuel costs over the life of their car."
But according to FuelEconomy.gov, maintained by the U.S. Department of Energy, the Cybertruck can qualify for the tax credits as well.

The site notes that qualifying models must be assembled in North America and are limited to a retail price of $80,000, the same parameters put on any vehicles that hope to qualify. Since the Cybertruck is assembled in Tesla's Texas Gigafactory and two of its current options retail under $80,000, it could indeed qualify.
Neither the IRS nor the Department of Energy responded to Reason's requests for confirmation that the Cybertrucks would qualify, but Tesla clearly thinks so: The Cybertruck order page on the automaker's website lists "purchase price" alongside prices with "probable savings," which "assume IRA Federal Tax Credits up to $7,500 for Rear-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive and est. gas savings of $3,600 over 3 years."
It's worth wondering why the Cybertruck should qualify for tax credits that are nominally intended to benefit people who want to switch to an electric vehicle and need a little help. It stands to reason that anybody both willing and able to spend around the median annual household income on a futuristic-looking luxury truck should have to cover the entire cost themselves, without any help from the American taxpayer.
Earlier this year, Biden promoted the E.V. tax credits by tweeting a photo of himself driving a GMC Hummer EV, even though no version of the Hummer EV available at the time cost less than $84,000. For the 2024 model year, GMC is planning to offer the base model EV2 starting at $79,995—$5 below the cutoff. Similarly, Tesla currently set the all-wheel-drive Cybertruck's retail price at $79,990.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"According to a Treasury Department website, two of the three Cybertruck models currently offered would qualify for tax credits."
Why wouldn't it?
Electric vehicles are playthings for rich people - Cybertruck is no different.
Cybertruck is the type example.
That thing has zero cargo space. They should be sued for false advertising for calling it a truck.
Cyber El Camino doesn't have the same ring to it.
It's got a 6 foot bed just like all the other poser trucks out there that can't actually be used as a truck.
Most versions of every truck model aren’t offered with an 8 foot bed. My Ram has the 6 foot bed, but I have a bed extender if I have to transport longer items.
While I admire Musk for turning science fiction into reality, his designs look like what happens when no one has the balls to say "That look really dumb."
It’s funny when people think they are smarter than musk..
He's smarter than me, which makes him hella-smarter than you, but his aesthetics are autistic.
What products have you designed that have 1 million pre orders?
Neener neener nya nya.
Doesn't contradict what I said. The stuff he designs is fut buggly.
You appear to be outnumbered 1 million to one.
Jeff is firmly behind him.
Joined at the hips, one might say.
Not to defend Jeffry or Sarcasmic, or whatever but...
To be clear, not saying the guy has no talent and I don't be grudge him any of the money or success he's had. But sometimes, you're a one-in-a-million genius and sometimes you're more of a 1-in-100 or 1-in-1,000 genius surrounded by 50 million morons.
A million people signed up to buy a cybertruck a year ago or a year in advance? If every last one of the million of them are jabbed are we celebrating Musk's genius or the result of decades of leftist, environmentalist social engineering?
Because there are people around here who, on an article highlighting how even an $80K Tesla cybertruck enjoys an almost $7500 tax break (federally) will still say "EVs are just really popular!"
They signed up for preorders before the rebate was even thought of.
Overall, EV’s aren’t all that popular. At least according to over 3,000 auto dealers around the US who sent an open letter to Biden asking him to reverse his EV mandates and regulations.
They signed up for preorders before the rebate was even thought of.
The Federal EV Credit started in 2008. Musk didn't even mention designing a pickup truck, not even a sketchy verbal outline of it until 2014.
I keep forgetting that you support the social engineering program and, just like the anti-science tranny supporters, will pretend that will obfuscate that is just strictly about the tax credit and has nothing to do with the rest of the GND, the radical(ly retarded) environmentalism, and the fact that tards like you have been shouting "THE WURLDZ GUNNA END! BY ULTERNUTIVE VEHIKULLZ THAT DOENT EMIT CARBON!" at schoolchildren in The Science! classes as part of your social engineering scam for at least 3 decades.
The Cybertruck intentionally resembles the eponymous vehicle from the 1970’s Saturday morning tv show ‘Ark 2’. I tried to link a picture, but good old Reason managed to prevent that.
I think it looks dumb too, but it performs pretty well as far as I have read.
At least it looks a bit less 'Dr. Evil' than Bezos's rockets.
"Depending on options, the Cybertruck can achieve 600–845 horsepower and cost between $60,000–$100,000—clearly making it a luxury purchase and not for the shopper on a budget."
The Ford F-150, the most popular truck in the US, starts at 35k. The mid-level is 60k, and the high end is over 80 - Cybertruck falls pretty squarely into the mid-to-luxury end of the market.
A quick google says that F-150 has 350-700 horses depending on the engine. On paper the UglyMobile looks like it's got more pep.
Oh, it probably does. There's Tesla's video of it outrunning a Porsche while towing a Porsche. Electric vehicles are known for grunt at all speeds - for maybe 200 miles;) On a not too warm or not too cold day.
It's all in the torque.
Electric motors have all the torque, all the time. Turbine engines would be on the opposite end with their need to spool up.
A normal non EV F150 is far more capable of doing sustained truck work. EV trucks are expensive toys.
The Tesla would probably be pretty useless for doing things a truck is supposed to do, like carrying a motorcycle or sheets of plywood.
It can carry 4x8 sheets of plywood.
How many will?
It's, once again, a typical Musk gimmick. It holds a 4x8 sheet... if you put the tailgate down (and allow all the other stuff you've put in the bed to roll out) which, once the tailgate's down, a $15K hatchback "can carry 4x8 sheets of plywood".
Not that other manufacturers are necessarily better or worse about sale gimmicks but Musk is a car salesman who puts the tailgate down on his truck to hold a 4x8 sheet of plywood and the fanbois say "Egineer!", "CEO!", and "Genius!"
Sorry, puts the tailgate down on his $80K truck to hold a piece of plywood and the fanbois say "Genius!".
It’s a useless, overpriced pig with gigantic batteries that take a long time to charge.
You can't be this stupid. It's like comparing a 600 hp Mustang (Mach-E or other) to an F-150 and saying "See, mid-to-luxury truck". The low-end Cybertruck is going to have nowhere near the range, bed space, or towing capacity at range of the $35K model F-150 and unless you plan on using your F-150 for drag racing, 600 hp is unecessary.
This is the same bullshit that Musk pulls and the climate-cum-car tards and GND white saviors continue to fall for.
It's completely hideous. Can't believe it will sell on that fact alone.
Yeah, the look needs some work. But then again, it sticks out and everyone will know how special you are when they see you in one.
Like a corvette or Lamborghini?
Yeah, like that. Only this one is ugly.
Butterface of cars.
Like a VW Thing
"everyone will know how special you are when they see you in one." Special, as in "special education."
Instead of doing shitty sketches about Congressional testimony SNL should redo the skit with Jon Lovitz and Phil Hartman where Lovitz plays an aging Picasso paying everyone with shitty "It's a Picasso!" sketches. Except it's Musk and Teslas instead of Picasso and sketches and paintings.
SNL should be canceled.
"It's worth wondering why the Cybertruck should qualify for tax credits that are nominally intended to benefit people who want to switch to an electric vehicle and need a little help. It stands to reason that anybody both willing and able to spend around the median annual household income on a futuristic-looking luxury truck should have to cover the entire cost themselves, without any help from the American taxpayer."
Why should people who want to switch to an electric vehicle and need a little help get any money from 'the American taxpayer'?
You're bitching about Tesla getting the subsidy here - not that the subsidy exists.
If you accept that the subsidy is acceptable, then you've already lost the argument - its just nackering over where to draw the line.
Teslaman bad, mkay?
Exactly. This has nothing to do with Tesla, their former precious beautiful baby of all things green, and everything to do with "How dare you buy our Ministry of Truth and start red-pilling people."
Every Dreamer should be given one of these.
Well I'm sure glad I work 60hrs a week to help virtue signalers buy their next luxury vehicle. NOT! F'You criminals; go buy your own sh*t.
How much do wiper blade replacements on that thing cost?
$0 or $60+K. That's how this ecosystem/own nothing and like it thing works.
Guys, seriously?
It's because they genuinely believe "working families" have six figures to throw around on status symbols. Remember when Let's Go Brandon had the gas up to $5/gal or more in some places?
Their response was, "Buy a Tesla."
These people live in Clown World. This is par for the course.
You also can't get the full credit unless you actually pay $7500 in federal income tax. You have to make about $80K a year, single filer, before you might pay that much.
Your monthly payment on a 5 year loan is going to be around $1500 a month, that's close to 25% or your monthly take home pay. Then you likely have yearly state license taxes.
If you follow the rule for cars of 20% down, 3 year loan with payments being no more than 8% of your gross pay you really can't afford one unless you make around 290K a year.