Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Israel

112 Hostages

Plus: Segregationist Christmas parties, California cops, Israeli gun licenses, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 12.15.2023 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Kidnapped by Hamas posters | Deb Cohn-Orbach/UCG/Universal Images Group/Newscom
(Deb Cohn-Orbach/UCG/Universal Images Group/Newscom)

Hostages remain: In Gaza, more than two months after the October 7 Hamas attack, the Israeli military estimates that there are still 112 hostages being held, with roughly 20 additional believed to be dead. Many of the women and children initially taken by Hamas have been freed during the temporary ceasefire that ended on December 1, so the remaining hostages are primarily Israeli men, with a few women, children, and foreign nationals in the mix.

War rages on in the Middle East where, this week, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan is in Tel Aviv, meeting with Israeli officials. Biden administration high-ups have been putting a lot of pressure on Israel lately to bring the military campaign in Gaza to an end, pursuing more targeted takeouts of Hamas militants instead. "Sullivan did not specify a timetable," per The New York Times, "but four U.S. officials said Mr. Biden wants Israel to switch to more precise tactics in about three weeks."

"The new phase that the Americans envision would involve smaller groups of elite forces that would move in and out of population centers in Gaza, carrying out more precise missions to find and kill Hamas leaders, rescue hostages and destroy tunnels, the officials said," reports the Times.

Yesterday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced it had taken action against a soldier who went into a mosque in Jenin, in the West Bank, and sang Jewish prayers over a loudspeaker, filming himself doing so in a video that went viral. He was in Jenin as part of the IDF's three-day raid there, which ended yesterday, and allegedly killed 12 people—at least 10 whom the Israeli military says are Hamas terrorists—while injuring 34.

"Israeli military incursions in Jenin, commonplace for years, have become more frequent since the Hamas-led attacks on Oct. 7," reports The New York Times.

New CDC director on the job: Back in April 2020, 14 percent of Republicans said they had "not too much" or "no confidence at all" in "scientists to act in the public's best interest." Fast forward to now, it's up to 38 percent, per Pew data. Of all American adults, "the share expressing the strongest level of trust in scientists—saying they have a great deal of confidence in them—has fallen from 39% in 2020 to 23% today."

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seems to think that if we just appoint a normie mom to the head spot, all will be well again. Not so.

"I'm not just the C.D.C. director, I'm also a mom," Mandy K. Cohen told a Fox station in Dallas last month. Her daughters already got their COVID vaccines, "so I wouldn't recommend something for the American people I wouldn't recommend for my own family," she said.

Cohen was picked by President Joe Biden to take over for Rochelle Walensky, who oversaw and enabled a coercive, expanded CDC that even saw fit to create an eviction moratorium that made it, in many places, impossible for landlords to evict nonpaying tenants. That CDC, under Walensky, seemed almost religiously committed to masking in schools—schools that were allowed to open, at least—even when credible studies contradicted that conclusion. At every turn, Walensky relied on suspect scientific research and favored blunt-forced tools that infringed on Americans' civil liberties.

So now, the CDC is trying out Cohen, who is attempting to brand herself as a relatable messenger who can really speak to Red America.

But here's the rub. "When Representative Daniel Crenshaw, Republican of Texas, pushed her to admit [during recent congressional testimony] that the C.D.C. had been wrong during the pandemic, she politely ignored the request," according to The New York Times. 

Until our public health agencies are fully rid of people who violated our civil liberties, and until those agencies admit their wrongdoing, public trust will not be restored, no matter how many times Cohen mentions her kids.


Scenes from New York: Can the city's new subway turnstiles actually thwart fare-beaters?


QUICK HITS

  • Watch the second episode of Just Asking Questions—featuring Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.):

  • "A plurality of swing-state Generation Z voters—those born in 1997 or later—say Biden is not doing enough to address the burden of student loan payments, even after he has erased $127 billion in such debt in initiatives that are widely thought to be aimed at locking in that key demographic," reports Bloomberg. I might scream.
  • Profoundly frustrated (but not surprised) by how The New York Times' podcast, The Daily, made Rep. Elise Stefanik's (R–N.Y.) questioning of elite college presidents over how they handle antisemitism on campus into…a moment that shows few problems with higher ed administrators, but rather, apparently, an attempt by Stefanik to redirect from opponents' accusations that she dabbles in "great replacement" theory talk. (Literal use of "Republicans seized" in this episode, proceed with caution.)
  • How an obscure IRS tax code change is making it so tech companies are being forced to lay off even more people.
  • Presidential failson Hunter Biden is now defying congressional subpoenas, refusing to "appear privately for a deposition before Republican investigators" who want to have a little chat with him about his business dealings, per the Associated Press.
  • For once, California cops seem able to do what their New York counterparts refuse.
  • Oklahoma's governor signed an executive order prohibiting offices of diversity, equity, and inclusion on college campuses. But some are saying that the actual legislation is narrowly tailored and actually does a decent job protecting academic freedom.
  • "After a party invitation for elected officials of color was accidentally sent to the entire Boston city council, Mayor Michelle Wu spoke to media about carving out spaces for communities of color," reads a hilarious tweet from NBC News. Maybe major news outlets shouldn't justify segregation.
  • Back in 2021, only 150,000 private citizens held gun licenses out of Israel's total population of 9 million. Following the October 7 terrorist attack, Israelis have applied for more than 250,000 gun licenses.
  • The Harrison Bergeron posting will continue until morale (politics) improves:

We live in the era of the Handicapper General https://t.co/9xAUFuAQEI

— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) December 15, 2023

  • This seems to, uh, misunderstand how internet access works:

MSNBC's @MilesTaylorUSA: If elected, Trump may "turn off the Internet." https://t.co/OstdHL4n9T pic.twitter.com/IcE9rtRfM5

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 14, 2023

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Why Are California's Animal Shelters Killing So Many Pets?

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

IsraelPalestineMiddle EastWarSocial JusticeBostonCaliforniaNew YorkGun RightsPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (524)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   1 year ago

    FJB

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      sarcasmic 1 year ago
      Flag Comment Mute User
      What about the blind hatred for Biden in these comments? Seems like a majority of the people here start the day with the “Fuck Joe Biden” prayer. Why is that warranted while anyone who says “Boo” about Trump is accused of Trump Derangement Syndrome?

      Posted merely because he is pretending to not defend democrats again this morning.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        For a guy with "sarcasm" in his name, he ironically fails to understand a lot of sarcasm. His comment in the Greenhut article was merely looking for a fight.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          He has made that comment in 3 of the last 5 non brickbat threads.

          He only comes here to get his victimization buzz going.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            Curious how the guy who always says others are playing the victim card can't stop crying about how Trump and his minions are poor victims of an unfair system that's rigged against him and Republicans (which includes JesseAz so we're talking massive self pity here) an how Trump is a victim and it's unfair and Republicans are victims and it's so unfair victims unfair victims unfair unfair unfair!

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Where did I do that?

              Let's get right to it sarc. Do you support government abuses for people you dislike. Yes or no?

              Do you agree with novel legal theories being constructed to do so? Yes or no.

              Do you agree with DAs and such campaigning on convicting someone you dislike? Yes or no?

              This is why everyone thinks you support state abuses for political purposes. This is why you get called a leftist. You don't give two fucks that state power is utilized against your enemies. This is why you're not a fucking libertarian.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                My answers are no, I've heard that narrative bandied about but haven't decided yet, and of course not that's shameful.

                In your case it's yes, yes, and fuck yes, as long as the people being abused are Democrats.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Of your answer is really no, why do you claim people who are against that are, in your words,

                  Curious how the guy who always says others are playing the victim card can’t stop crying about how Trump and his minions are poor victims of an unfair system that’s rigged against him

                  Your answer here is orthogonal to your attempted attack. You are attacking people you now claim you agree with for criticizing what you now claim is bad.

                  Do you understand how dumb this makes you look.

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    The statement you quote is a statement about you and only about you. Not about Trump and his minions. It's about someone who accuses others of playing victim while parading himself, his party, his political savior, and all of Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS) as victims of the most victimized sort.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      So you don't really understand how dumb you look. Got it. Keep at it I guess. I mean you used the same argument against others below. So you are lying here as well. You have major issues.

                    2. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                      Over 18000 Palestinians killed by Jews including over 13000 women and children.

                      Your US tax dollars at work funding genocide, terrorism and crimes against humanity.

                      Just take away what the west stole for these terrible Jews. Take away their power and let them live in Palestine like they did before they stole it 76 years ago.

                      Then we’ll see how Jews fare trying to kill Palestinian women and children.

                      Cowards.

                    3. Truthfulness   1 year ago

                      @Rob Misek

                      Still relying on those unreliable Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry numbers? There's no credibility to the claim. To hell with you.

                    4. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                      Questioning the numbers reported by the likes of CNN and Reuters is your only and feeble response to the accusation that Jews are committing genocide, crimes against humanity and terrorism supported and funded by your tax dollars.

                    5. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                      Saying that the Gaza health ministry who is the only group counting the dead and wounded is Hamas as justification is the same as targeting and killing every non combatant Palestinian.

                      That is the definition of genocide and a crime against humanity.

                    6. Rob Misek   1 year ago

                      What this atrocity clearly demonstrates about you lying waste of skin Jews crying about Nazis and holocausts is that you don’t really care about either.

                      Your ONLY motivation is and has always been to further your own narcissistic self interests.

                      Jews are committing a holocaust in Gaza today to steal it for themselves.

                      Jews, Zelensky, are employing Nazis in Ukraine to terrorize the population and through war steal that nation’s wealth for Jewish/western interests.

                      Too bad the west ever supported these terrible jews.

                      Funding genocide, terrorism and crimes against humanity has destroyed any western claim to moral authority.

                2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  I've said it a few times this morning. Youre a projecting hypocritical piece of shit. Glad we could put that out there in such a succinct series of posts. =)

                  1. R Mac   1 year ago

                    The sad thing is sarc doesn’t understand what just happened.

            2. Agammamon   1 year ago

              Are you now trying to play the victim over this again?

              Only one victim point per victimization, you don't get to re-use one.

            3. Marshal   1 year ago

              sarcasmic
              Trump is a victim and it’s unfair and Republicans are victims and it’s so unfair victims unfair victims unfair unfair unfair!

              Notice how sarc characterizes demands for equal and fair treatment as character flaws so he can change the subject from equal treatment to the person while deriding them.

              Later today he'll whine that others criticize people instead of discussing issues.

        2. Sevo   1 year ago

          There's also a lying pile of collectivist lefty shit claiming to be an 'individualist'; steaming piles of lefty shit lie. It's what they do.

      2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        Are you saying that that statement of mine is wrong? Because as I see it you guys get together every morning and chant "Fuck Joe Biden" over and over as if God gives a shit. However if anyone said "Fuck Donald Trump" a couple dozen of you guys would descend upon the person and rip away their flesh.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          I'm sure you have a citation for your bald assertion. Lol. Just kidding. More of your projection.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Now if you had said people would point out the falsity of your left narratives like your trump is a dictator claim last week, yes you'll get a dozen people pointing out how big an idiot you are for propagating leftist narratives blindly.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              So that's your latest lie. That I said Trump is a dictator. Keep it up. The only people who believe you are morons. But for you that's something to be proud of.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                And what evidence do you have that Trump was, is, or will be a dictator? Please, feel free to post links with your cites.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  I have his citation. Waiting for him to agree to the bet.

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    You mean when I was sarcastically saying what you'd say if you were honest?

                    Go for it. The only people who will be impressed are so stupid I'm surprised they remember to breathe.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Agree to the bet. There is no sarcasm in your post.

                      So agree to the bet and I will post.

                    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      I'm not agreeing to any bet because you're a liar and a piece of shit. You can post whatever you want. I'm sure you'll take it out of context, lie by omission, and claim your inferences matter more than the actual words.

                      As usual.

                    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Agree to the bet sarc. You demanded the citation yesterday. What are you scared of? If I'm a liar the post doesn't exist. You seem scared.

                    4. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      "You scared? You're scared. You must be scared."

                      Grow up and get a life.

              2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                We had a bet yesterday. Will you agree to say you're a pathalogical liar if I post your post on daily mail claiming trump said he would be a dictator? Yes or no?

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  This is yet another example of you inferring something from what I say and then claiming that I said what you inferred, instead of what I actually said.

                  Funny thing is that nobody cares. Those of us who are disgusted by your lies have given up on clarifying the truth, and those who are impressed by your lies don't care about the truth. One thing everyone has in common though, they know you're a liar.

                  1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    Yes or no sarc. Will you admit you are a pathalogical liar if I do as you ask and provide the citation.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Soon as you own up to all of your lies.

                    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Yes or no sarc. Why are you scared? You claimed yesterday you didn't make the post. What are you worried about?

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Own up to your lies and we're on.

                      Afraid?

                    4. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      You keep making claims despite given evidence. This is probably why you are scared.

                      So yes or no. If I'm lying you shouldn't be scared to say yes.

                    5. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Do whatever you're going to do. I don't give a shit. What I'm not doing is making some sort of deal with you, because making deals with piece of shit liars is foolish.

        2. R Mac   1 year ago

          Fuck Joe Biden.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            Keep praying. Maybe the great elephant in the sky will answer.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              OK, does "fuck you" work better, sarc?

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                I don't really give a shit. I just find it humorous that you start off every day with "Fuck Joe Biden" and scream "TDS" like some deranged person whenever anyone says anything disparaging about Trump.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  You seem really emotional for people pointing out your open and glaring political biases.

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    Cry more about how Trump is a victim, about how Republicans are victims, and how you're a victim for being a Republican who supports Trump.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Just above you said no to the three questions. Here it appears you support the opposite. Weird.

                      Or is your new claim trump is not being prosecuted in a political manner?

                    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Victim, victim victim. You poor poor victim.

                    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Keep spiraling buddy. That 40 oz is calling you.

                    4. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

                      You're actually taunting someone you believe is an alcoholic, with alcohol. Classy.

                    5. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      You’re actually taunting someone you believe is an alcoholic, with alcohol. Classy.

                      He's like school at five in the mornin. No class.

                    6. Truthfulness   1 year ago

                      @ObviouslyNotSpam @sarcasmic
                      It's like neither of you have any clue how time zones and responsible drinking work!

              2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                I want to hear sarcs defense of why Joe Biden shouldn't be cursed.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I want to hear JesseAz's defense of why they all shouldn't be cursed.

                  1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                    This is your problem sarc. Youre too big a fucking drunk retard to even defend your positions. Lol.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Why can't you agree with jeff's post below, where he says fuck you to all of them?

                    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Because neither you or Jeff can actual cite yourselves actually saying fuck you to all of them. All I have to do is pull up an article critical of the left and show neither of you criticizing the left.

                      You only do so when pretending to be neutral. It is meaningless.

                      Jeff has hundreds of posts defending the left and their policies. It is a lie.

                      The sad part is you two think you're intelligent enough for people not to notice. Shrike tries to play the same game.

                      Critcize Biden. Let's see if you can even do it instead of crying about people saying FJB.

                    3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Critcize Biden.

                      I've got nothing good to say about the guy. As far as policies go he's just doing what Democrats do. No surprises there. He said the Constitution said he couldn't do something, then he went and did it anyway. He's been in government all his life and hasn't a fucking clue as to what life is like for people without power. Guy doesn't even know where he is half the time.

                      Let’s see if you can even do it instead of crying about people saying FJB.

                      I don't really care about your prayers. My point was that you flip out and say anyone critical of Trump has mental illness, yet you chant "Fuck Joe Biden" every day like it's meditation or something. I find the hypocrisy, especially in light of your constant accusations of hypocrisy, to be amusing.

            2. R Mac   1 year ago

              I’m sorry those words upset you so much.

              Fuck Joe Biden.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                I'm sorry for pointing out sarc gets upset when the left is criticized. Fuck Joe Biden.

              2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Shouldn't you be crying about how Trump is being victimized by evil Democrats?

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  Again just above you claimed no to supporting political abuses against topponents and DAs running on platforms to convict individuals. Here you claim trump isnt being victimized.

                  Are you capable of understanding what are post?

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    Poor victimized Trump. So unfair. Cry more.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Yes. State abuses against political opponents is unfair. Glad you openly disagree.

                2. R Mac   1 year ago

                  I’m saying Fuck Joe Biden. And it’s hurting your feelings.

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    And you wonder why I say you're tied with Dlam for the prize of being the dumbest person in the comments.

                    1. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Fuck Joe Biden.

                    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Fuck them all.

                    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Lol. Sarc will never criticize a Democrat in isolation. He will say this only when his biases are so openly exposed. Fucking hilarious.

                      Who the fuck do you think is dumb enough to fall for your bullshit sarc? Again I can randomly choose any story critical of Biden and show your refusal to criticize him while attacking the GOP in those threads. This is deflection. This is your documented behavior. Nobody buys your lies retard.

                      Another bet. I'll go through the last 10 stories critical of Joe Biden and post your comments. If there are more deflections against the GOP than attacks or criticism of Biden, I'll admit you're a centrist. If not you admit you're a raging partisan pathalogical liar. Agree?

                    4. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Thanks for proving my point.

                      Fuck Joe Biden and his son. They suck. Fuck Pelosi with a stick. AOC needs to be hate-fucked as a matter of principle. And don't get me started about that Warren cunt. I think you can agree to that.

                      Also...

                      Fuck Trump the crybaby and his idiot minions. Fuck Republicans for claiming to be fiscally responsible and fuck people who believe they are. Fuck both teams for perpetuating ongoing assaults on liberty.

                      That last part you simply cannot concur with, because it would mean saying things about your hallowed tribe.

        3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          You realize that millions of people do say (or at least think) "Fuck Trump" everyday, prompted by at least 90% of professional and social media, right?

          Maybe Reason provides a forum for rebuttal.

        4. MoreFreedom   1 year ago

          If you're going to argue about who's allowed to disparage Biden or Trump (IMHO everyone is entitled to do so given our freedom of speech), you ought to provide a reason - e.g. a particular EO, stated support of a law, lack of enforcing a law, abusing one's office via some act, etc., with your disparaging statement.

          Lacking that backup, you're not contributing to civil society and just engaging in incivility, and look like the Boy who Cried Wolf.

        5. Marshal   1 year ago

          sarcasmic
          Are you saying that that statement of mine is wrong? Because as I see it you guys get together every morning and chant “Fuck Joe Biden” over and over as if God gives a shit. However if anyone said “Fuck Donald Trump” a couple dozen of you guys would descend upon the person and rip away their flesh.

          That's pretty amusing coming from a guy whining about anyone saying FJB but who routinely attacks Trump, and really anyone on the right.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            You can fuck Joe all day long. Whatever floats your boat.

            I just find it amusing that you, who would accuse others of being mentally ill with Trump Derangement Syndrome if they started every morning by chanting "Fuck Donald Trump," defend starting every morning by chanting "Fuck Joe Biden."

            1. DesigNate   1 year ago

              I mean, he's (Biden) objectively worse than even Bush or Obama were, just based on actual policy.

              Anyone here saying Fuck Joe Biden is because of his policies and the obvious corruption. Well that and 50 fucking years being a member of the government class all while fucking us average citizens with burdensome laws and regulations.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

                Anyone here saying Fuck Joe Biden is because of his policies and the obvious corruption.

                Or, it's because they are tribal nitwits who reflexively say "Fuck " regardless of policy.

              2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

                Ugh, angle bracket fail.

                Or, it's because they are tribal nitwits who reflexively say "Fuck (Insert Tribal D Name Here)" regardless of policy.

                1. Chumby   1 year ago

                  Fuck Joe Biden (D)

      3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        Sarc is confused about the hatred of a traitorous pedofile that wants to destroy America. The hatred is there but it is not blind

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      Fuck Joe Biden
      Fuck Donald Trump
      Fuck Barack Obama
      Fuck George Bush
      Fuck Nikki Haley
      Fuck Ron DeSantis
      Fuck Vivek Ramaswamy
      Fuck Chris Christie
      Fuck Kamala Harris
      Fuck Nancy Pelosi
      Fuck Mitch McConnell
      Fuck Chuck Schumer
      Fuck Team Red
      Fuck Team Blue
      Fuck the corrupt two party duopoly

      1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        aye

      2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        That's great, except coming from you it is meaningless.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Dishonest too. He only means three of those.

          Somehow, after posting tens of thousands of ringing defenses for the top men in the establishment uniparty, we're supposed to believe he's serious about Pelosi, McConnell, Schumer, Haley and Obama.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Most democrats think everyone else is stupid. They forget this is mostly true of democrats but not others.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              Says someone who would never say fuck [insert name of Republican here] unless that Republican has done the unthinkable and shown independent thinking.

          2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            I agree with all of the fucks. Them all. Feed 'em beans. Then fuck them again.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    In Gaza, more than two months after the October 7 Hamas attack, the Israeli military estimates that there are still 112 hostages being held...

    Israel needs to get a Hamas calculator and multiply that number by 100.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Can that calculator run 100 days on 3 days of fuel?

      1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

        The best they can do is make one day's worth of candle oil burn for eight days.

        Hamas are absolute miracle workers with generator diesel by comparison.

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          Anything could burn for 8 days if the levels of fuel, Oxygen, and spark were just right. A Miracle did not occur, M'Bubbalah.

          *Tips fedora-brimmed Yarmulke.*

  3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    "Can the city's new subway turnstiles actually thwart fare-beaters?"

    I thought NYC made fare jumping a non-crime? "Manhattan Stops Prosecuting Subway Fare Jumpers"

    1. Chumby   1 year ago

      Would it be fair to skip the fare at the faire?

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        Only if thou ist a varlet who desireth to bogart yon turkey legs and mead!
        🙂
        😉

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Uh, sure, Frodo.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            I respecteth private property rights of all innocent Middle-Eathlings and say "Carefully, carefully with the plates" at yon Renaissance FreakNic as well.
            🙂
            😉

      2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Only if you are a fairy.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      If they were as woke as SFC, NYC would make fares a crime. Or at least impose social credit-based fares.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    "...I wouldn't recommend something for the American people I wouldn't recommend for my own family," she said.

    We have two kinds of liberals in DC: ones that will sacrifice their own young for whatever bullshit ideology, and ones that will send their children to private school while fighting against choice. Which do you suppose this one is.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Why not both? And you forgot the liberal type ready to sacrifice other people's children. Or is that all of them?

  5. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Define irony.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ex-fbi-intel-chief-who-investigated-trump-russia-collusion-gets-4-years-prison-colluding

    A former top FBI official who led the agency's New York counterintelligence division, and played a key role in the Trump-Russia collusion probe, has been sentenced to 4 years in prison for colluding with Russia - and he may face an even longer sentence under a second indictment for hiding $225,000 in payments from a former Albanian intelligence officer.

    Charles McGonigal, 55, was arrested in January and slapped with two separate indictments - one in New York and one in Washington, with the New York case related to taking nearly $200,000 in bribes from Russian oligarch Oleg V. Deripaska to investigate a rival oligarch, and the Washington case concerning the Albanian money.

    While heading up the NY counterintelligence division, McGonigal was responsible for supervising and participating in investigations of Russian oligarchs, including Deripaska.

    1. Chumby   1 year ago

      When all you have is a hammer, everything you see is orange man bad.

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Whatever the left accuses you of, they are already doing.

      1. Minadin   1 year ago

        Which is interesting, given every manner of corruption that they've accused their opposition of committing.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Interesting, or nauseating and frightening?

        2. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

          The accusations sound legitimate because they can describe how it is done so accurately. Because they know.

          1. MoreFreedom   1 year ago

            Excellent observation Josey - you're taking after your namesake.

      2. Super Scary   1 year ago

        "Whatever the left accuses you of, they are already doing."

        This is why people need to be more afraid when the dems say that Trump running again is going to "destroy democracy." They will do exactly that in order to prevent him from getting back into office.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          And the best way to prevent some future election that allows an undesirable type to win office?

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      "A bunch of idiots dancing to a song by a band that died in a plane crash."

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Any Democrat telling us what they will do to save democracy?

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        And their center-right/neocon allies.

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Lea Thompson?

      1. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

        Wolverines!

        1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

          Oh, yeah. I was thinking of the love scene in Howard the Duck. Yours is better.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    When Representative Daniel Crenshaw, Republican of Texas, pushed her to admit [during recent congressional testimony] that the C.D.C. had been wrong during the pandemic, she politely ignored the request...

    Mom knows not to show weakness in front of the kids.

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Just for the record, you cannot politely ignore questions when giving testimony.
      You can defiantly ignore, rudely ignore, or lyingly ignore, but NOT politely.
      Eliminate the CDC & NIH for crimes against humanity.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

        The entire hhs needs to go

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Let's start with only the agencies and roles defined in the Constitution.

          1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

            Hey NSA!
            I found another insurrectionist over here!

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              Will you at least share your extra potato ration reward with me?

    2. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      "I'm not just the C.D.C. director, I'm also a mom," Mandy K. Cohen told a Fox station in Dallas last month.

      Sooooo...Is the C.D.C. the Hair Club for M.I.L.F.s? Any "Before" and "After" pics?
      🙂
      😉

  7. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    A plurality of swing-state Generation Z voters—those born in 1997 or later—say Biden is not doing enough to address the burden of student loan payments...

    Do I detect some fragile surface tension in the higher education bubble?

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      The easiest way to ease the burden of student loan payments is not to go to college in the first place, and if you do, get the "general education" bullshit out of the way at community college. Some high schools even have programs where you can get these credits while you're finishing high school.

      1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

        Even back-water Idaho has these programs. My daughter almost had her AS when she graduated HS. Finished the AS at CC, and transferred to U of I with reduced tuition. Total spent was around $20K.

      2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

        Community college. Yuck.

        1. Public Entelectual   1 year ago

          Orange Man almost as bad as Queens Community College graduation rate.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      In the NYT right now:

      PAUL KRUGMAN
      The Biggest Threat to America’s Universities

      Wanna bet it's Trump?

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        No bet.

  8. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Kirby goes on TV again and states if we don't find Ukraine, NATO and American troops will get involved.

    Top Biden spokesman John Kirby: "Imagine the cost in blood and treasure in the lives of our own troops and those of our NATO allies" if Republicans continue pushing for border security

    There is video, but before I post it I need Maines greatest IT level 2 help desk agent to use his vast Google skills to let me know if it fake. I dont need the link to his evidence, just his bald assertion.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "before I post it I need Maines greatest IT level 2 help desk agent to use his vast Google skills to let me know if it fake."

      To this moose-fuckers old ears that sounds like a job for the only fair and balanced, never-trolling poster here.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Maybe the one true libertarian?

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      LEAVE THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ALONE!!!

      — sarc

    3. Nardz   1 year ago

      https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1735621448373256275?t=Yruro290TRalC4xd00l5yg&s=19

      BREAKING: UKRAINE DEPUTY DETONATES GRENADE IN COUNCIL MEETING | 1 DEAD, 26 INJURED

      [Video]

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1735627001925443672?t=_n6Xd31M1KjLvzwFKbDUQA&s=19

        Politician throws THREE grenades into the crowd.

        In Transcarpathia, a local deputy blew up a village council meeting along with himself with several grenades.

        As a result, 26 people were injured, 6 of them are in serious condition. The reasons for this action are still unknown.

        Preliminary reasons why Transcarpathian deputy Batrin blew up grenades have become known

        Deputies at the session approved the budget for 2024. The media write that Batrin argued very strongly with them - he demanded that the deputies report on the 2023 budget, and then adopt the budget for 2024.

        A few minutes before the explosion, the deputy was quarreling with his colleagues that during the war it was impossible to give the village mayor a 50% bonus and a monthly bonus of 100% of the salary. At some point, Batrin left the hall and returned 2 minutes 40 seconds later. The media also claim that another deputy left with Batrin, but did not return to the hall.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Pretty harsh reaction for only getting another 200M? After the first 100B. Imagine if Ukraine got nothing.

          1. mad.casual   1 year ago

            I'm no Ukrainian Money Laundering math expert, but I think "no money" translates to 100,000 more grenades.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          "A few minutes before the explosion, the deputy was quarreling with his colleagues that during the war it was impossible to give the village mayor a 50% bonus and a monthly bonus of 100% of the salary."

          Oh, so one of those icky far-right fiscal conservatives. Like Hitler.

      2. R Mac   1 year ago

        Holy shit.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Fake news! Nothing on NYT or WSJ, so it didn't happen (aka "we don't need to know about it").

      4. Chumby   1 year ago

        Narrator’s voice

        His presentation at the council meeting bombed and he would not be invited back

    4. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      Oh look, I found the source for Jesse's quotation above. It is literal Team Red talking points.

      https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1735366835682308328

      Yes it is true: Jesse is a Team Red fifty-center. He is literally repeating Team Red propaganda.

      Now, here is the *original source* for Kirby's words.

      https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2023/12/14/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-karine-jean-pierre-and-nsc-coordinator-for-strategic-communications-john-kirby-december-14-2023/

      So, in short, we cannot afford not to help. Imagine the cost in blood and treasure, in the lives of our own troops and those of our NATO Allies if we just walked away from this effort, if we just let Putin take Ukraine, wipe it off the map as an independent country.

      And you know what? He has a point.

      The critics of aid to Ukraine have a point too - it costs too much, the money could be better spent here at home (or not spent at all), we are supporting a country in Ukraine that is not exactly a flowering beacon of democracy, there is no exit strategy, all of these are valid points.

      On the other hand, have we learned nothing from the sad history of the 20th century? Then, tyrants and dictators would use force to invade their neighbors, while counting on the rest of the world to be too weak or too spineless to do anything about it. If the freedom-loving world of the 1930's had been more forceful in standing up to Hitler and Tojo then, how much carnage of the Second World War of the 1940's could have been avoided? If Western nations do not stand up now to Putin's aggression, will Western nations pay a much larger price, in blood, later on when he decides to expand his aggression even further?

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        If Western nations do not stand up now to Putin’s aggression, will Western nations pay a much larger price, in blood, later on when he decides to expand his aggression even further?

        That's what the neocons, warmongers, and Democrats are arguing, but this whole "we have to fight them there so we don't fight them here" rings hollow after the experiences of GWOT and the impact that had on our social and economic fabric. Invoking the ghost of Hitler only works with the Nuland/Kagan/Power/Kristol crowd these days, but they're the ones influencing our government and politicians. If they were exiled to a desert island as they deserve, no one would give a shit other than condemning Russia in the UN for invading the country unprovoked.

        I've pointed out from the very beginning that this all goes back to the 2004 Orange Revolution, and the proxy slapfight between Russia and the US over whose puppet is running the country. Whether Putin takes Ukraine or not is immaterial to the argument that he's going to roll into the rest of Eastern Europe if we don't stop him from doing so. That's the whole point of NATO, to serve as a deterrent from him doing that very thing.

        If Putin actually thinks there won't be any repercussions from moving into the Baltic NATO states or Poland, then the alliance either has no teeth, or Putin is straight-up insane. And I think we've all seen that he's not crazy. So why the hysteria over whether he conquers Ukraine or not? These arguments are just misdirection as cover for the State Department and CIA gayops we're running in the country, to keep it as a graft pipeline for our politicians and oligarchs, and in the hope that they can take over the Black Sea ports at Sevastopol to use as vacation resorts for their political retreats.

        And as I've also pointed out already, the actions of the US government don't match the rhetoric of their commissars and media shills. If it was that critical to stopping Putin, NATO would be running Allied Force or Odyssey Dawn operations, would have a FAR more intensive special forces presence, and would have deployed far more ground forces to the Polish border as a warning against doing the very thing these loudmouths claim Putin is going to try and do. That they haven't done so betrays their very rhetoric and the reasoning behind why we need to actually be involved here.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          The funniest thing about this conflict is how the same people who have been part of the "war is a racket" crowds for the last 50-plus years are now bawling like the very gung-ho cowboy strawman they criticized.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Yeah, but those liberal Neo-cons, with war boners for the first time, know they have to eliminate Putin before he elects Trump again.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

          Well, the 1930's did happen, regardless of what you or I may think of George Bush, GWOT, and neocons.

          If Putin actually thinks there won’t be any repercussions from moving into the Baltic NATO states or Poland, then the alliance either has no teeth, or Putin is straight-up insane.

          But here's the thing: if Western nations did nothing to defend/support Ukraine, why wouldn't Putin rationally conclude that NATO has no teeth? Why wouldn't he threaten the Baltic states/Poland next? "Because NATO"? Last I checked, nukes are more powerful than treaties.

          We don't want things to get to the point where our choices are either to use nukes to comply with our treaty obligations to defend Poland, or to submit to Putin's nuclear blackmail and let him roll in. Do we?

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            "Well, the 1930’s did happen"

            Putin isn't anything like Hitler, but in policy and beliefs you certainly are.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              True.

          2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            Jesus Christ, this is a full-throated defense of the Truman Doctrine. Tell us again how the Korean War was an unmitigated success! Were we right to defend our good ally South Vietnam? Perhaps we needed to give them even MORE support. Should have we listened to MacArthur and dropped the Bomb on Beijing and Shanghai?

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

              No, I am not interested in "containing" Putin or overthrowing Putin-friendly governments, only in not rewarding his aggression.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Uh, the whole point of both the Domino Theory, and and our funding of Ukraine's war effort, is for the very purpose of containment. Both claimants thought the Bad Guys were being "rewarded" if they were allowed to expand impeded.

                You even confirm this thinking by parroting the dumb claim that Putin's going to use this to attack NATO partners next.

              2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                So should North Vietnamese aggression have been rewarded? North Korean? Congolese?

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

                  I don't think any aggression should be rewarded. They are all violations of the NAP on an international scale. The question is what is the most appropriate response to instances of international aggression. Unlike NAP violations on an individual scale, NAP violations on an international scale require a different toolset, which tends to be more utilitarian. They don't and shouldn't ALL require a military response. Maybe a diplomatic-only response is the most appropriate one. Maybe a war-by-proxy response is the most appropriate one. And yes maybe direct military involvement is the most appropriate one - I'm not going to say direct military intervention is NEVER appropriate, but it should be very very rare IMO. There's a number of factors at play including alliances, strategic interests, military capabilities, etc., along with the nature and severity of the particular aggression.

          3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            Well, the 1930’s did happen, regardless of what you or I may think of George Bush, GWOT, and neocons.

            History is a guide, not a road map.

            if Western nations did nothing to defend/support Ukraine, why wouldn’t Putin rationally conclude that NATO has no teeth?

            Because it's irrelevant. Ukraine is not a formal ally of the US, nor is it a part of NATO. NATO shouldn't have gotten involved in this anymore than they should have gotten involved in Libya or Serbia--because NATO wasn't actually attacked.

            We don’t want things to get to the point where our choices are either to use nukes to comply with our treaty obligations to defend Poland, or to submit to Putin’s nuclear blackmail and let him roll in. Do we?

            This is a false dilemma that shouldn't be taken seriously. Again, the whole point of NATO is to act as a deterrent against direct attack by the USSR/Russia. The claim that Putin might go after Poland if he takes over all of Ukraine (and there's no evidence thus far that he's actually trying to do that) is nothing more than question-begging.

          4. R Mac   1 year ago

            Lying Jeffy just completely ignored what RR said about defending Poland.

        3. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

          If it was that critical to stopping Putin, NATO would be running Allied Force or Odyssey Dawn operations, would have a FAR more intensive special forces presence, and would have deployed far more ground forces to the Polish border as a warning against doing the very thing these loudmouths claim Putin is going to try and do.

          Don't confuse the difference between strategy and tactics.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            Deflection. "Strategy and tactics" didn't mean shit during GWOT. If it did, we wouldn't have invaded Iraq, nor would we have stayed in Afghanistan more than a month after doming Bin Laden.

        4. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          The eastern provinces will become part of Russia as they have voted to do. That's the war Putin has been fighting from the beginning. Ukraine will remain a nation state. There is zero evidence that Putin has any ambitions beyond that. All of this could have been resolved before the Russian invasion or shortly after. In the end the result will be exactly the same.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            This is where I depart. Irrespective of whether those regions wanted to be with Russia or not, it's a bad precedent for a country to just waltz in and take over part of a recognized state with established borders via a military invasion. We certainly wouldn't be okay with Mexico authorizing a literal military invasion of the country to take back, say, the Rio Grande Valley and Gadsden Purchase, even if the majority of people would prefer that. We'd rightly go ham on Mexico and call in every alliance card we could muster to repel it.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              My main point, though, is that this is a local conflict, and it needs to be handled locally. If Europe wants to help them out, fine, as its in their backyard. They shouldn't continue to rely on American military welfare like they have for 100 years now.

          2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            Oddly, Ukraine might be better off split. Prior to this, it's been a cleft country due to its history of the eastern half being Orthodox and under Russian control at various times, and the western half being more Western and under Polish or Austrian control in the past.

          3. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

            The eastern provinces will become part of Russia as they have voted to do.

            You mean, according to the referenda in 2014, which were conducted at Russian gunpoint, and were illegal according to the Ukrainian constitution?

            There is zero evidence that Putin has any ambitions beyond that.

            Except of course the initial stage of the war when the Russian military objective was Kiev itself.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              Haha, Lying Jeffy is completely ignorant on the topic.

        5. JesseAz   1 year ago

          It amuses me jeff goes 5o bat for Joe's State Departmeny right after he tried claiming fuck em all. Just hilarious.

      2. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

        If Western nations do not stand up now to Putin’s aggression, will Western nations pay a much larger price, in blood, later on when he decides to expand his aggression even further?

        Lol, no. Next question. Putin is not hitler despite what the feeble minds at NPR keep telling you.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

          He's not Hitler, but he is an autocrat who launched a war of aggression.

          How can you be so certain that his aggression will stop at Ukraine? Why wouldn't he threaten the Baltic countries or Eastern Europe next?

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Like Bush and Obama then?

          2. Chumby   1 year ago

            Thank you Lyndon Baines Johnson sucker domino theory shill.

            The western backed puppets in Kiev violated Minsk 2 and perpetuated a 7+ year campaign of genocide in Donetsk and Lugansk. Instead of getting the opportunity for more autonomy, they were killed. The eastern people living there asked for intervention and they received it.

            The libertarian position is to let the locals figure it out. Biden (D) took the proxy war position, which has led a near peer nation to chip away at the reserve currency monopoly and the petrodollar.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

              What is your evidence for the claim that Ukrainian forces were committing genocide in Donbas from 2014-2022? My understanding is that the claim was adjudicated before the International Criminal Court and found to be baseless.

              1. Chumby   1 year ago

                10,000 dead and violations of Minsk accords. The ICC is a western puppet court. For example, zero war crimes prosecutions against team Bush-Cheney-Biden-Clinton in Afghanistan.

        2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

          Not Hitler. Got it.

          Invading his neighbors to expand his nation's territory, eliminating all political opposition and persecuting minorities is totally fine, because he's "not Hitler". Got it.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            You're welcome to go sign up for the foreign volunteer legion anytime, tankie.

            1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

              No need! He's "not Hitler".

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Good, then there's no need for you to be limping out about it, then.

                When Putin actually attacks a NATO country, let us know.

              2. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

                jesus you fucking warboner normies are insufferable.

                Send your own sons and money to fight him, not mine.

      3. Nobartium   1 year ago

        Then, tyrants and dictators would use force to invade their neighbors, while counting on the rest of the world to be too weak or too spineless to do anything about it.

        That was the state of the world before the 20th century, and will be the state of world after you are dead.

      4. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        It's the same argument used by politicians everywhere.

        "Give us more money and more power. If we can catch one more criminal before he kills your family, you'll thank us."

        Ya know ... pre-crime detection doesn't work in that kind of detail. You either wait for criminals to self-identify by committing crimes, or you start throwing everybody in jail based on guesswork which devolves into political power plays. I suppose you could call it pretribution.

        I despise Putin more than Zelensky, but you know who I despise even more? Politicians who steal my money to give to Zelensky.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

          If you're going to talk about the war in the context of crime - Putin has already committed one "crime", aggression against Ukraine.

          How do you suggest this "crime" should be punished?

      5. R Mac   1 year ago

        Haha, Lying Jeffy is a neo-con.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Him and sarc both. They try to hide it like above but anytime they put something if substance out it is noticeable. And this is mostly because the DNC and neocons have essentially joined forces.

    5. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      Sorry, can't resist. Did you tell Ukraine to get lost?

      1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

        It may take all our troops to find it.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Profoundly frustrated (but not surprised) by how The New York Times' podcast...

    This podcast is not made for you.

  10. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    No wonder college is so expensive...

    https://twitter.com/Mark_J_Perry/status/1467959926567931913

    Just out today: (6 Dec 2021)
    @OhioState
    has a small army of 132 "diversicrats" at an avg. salary of $77,000 and total est. payroll cost of $13.4M, which would cover in-state tuition for 1,120 students
    https://apps.hr.osu.edu/salaries/ @jennsmola @CollegeFix @FreemanWSJ @stevenfhayward @charliekirk11

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      More "No wonder it costs so much"...not clear how many of the Yale staff are DEI, but you gotta think there's a pile of them...

      "Yale has more administrators than undergraduate students."

      ------------

      Administrative bloat in higher education has gotten so bad over the last three decades that many universities now employ more administrators than professors. But the problem at Yale University is even more serious than that: Yale has more administrators than undergraduate students. According to the Yale Daily News:

      Over the last two decades, the number of managerial and professional staff that Yale employs has risen three times faster than the undergraduate student body, according to University financial reports. The group's 44.7 percent expansion since 2003 has had detrimental effects on faculty, students and tuition, according to eight faculty members.

      As evidenced by the financial report from 2002-2003, Yale employed 3,500 administrators and managers while there were 5,307 undergraduate students enrolled at the university. Less than two decades later in 2019, before the pandemic affected enrollment, Yale employed more than 1,500 additional administrators while the undergraduate population had only risen by 600 students. Now undergraduate enrollment has dipped to 4,703, with more than 5,000 “managerial and professional staff.”

      Meanwhile, professor of English Leslie Brisman made light of the situation, remarking, “I think we don’t yet have a Vice President for the rights of the left-handed, but I haven’t checked this month,”

      1. Super Scary   1 year ago

        Too many chiefs, not enough Indians.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Now undergraduate enrollment has dipped to 4,703, with more than 5,000 “managerial and professional staff.”

        And it should be noted that the original justification for hiring additional admins (not just at Yale) was the democratization of college admissions, so that there would be enough staff to handle the student load.

        As I noted below, this didn't extend to the professoriate, just a bunch of make-work clowns with otherwise useless college degrees.

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

          At least some with useless college degrees can become college administrators.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        'Meanwhile, professor of English Leslie Brisman made light of the situation, remarking, “I think we don’t yet have a Vice President for the rights of the left-handed, but I haven’t checked this month”'

        Guess who wants to be "retired"?

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Uni Wisconsin finally agreed to not expand (not cut) DEI in exchange for 800M in state funding.

      It is all about indoctrination with them.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      This isn't anything new, of course--the delta between administrators of various kinds and actual teaching professors has grown exponentially at colleges for well over a generation now. It was inevitable when colleges made political correctness their theology in the 80s.

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      How dare you? That's like complaining that the staff at the Vatican is too large.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    How an obscure IRS tax code change is making it so tech companies are being forced to lay off even more people.

    All tax code changes are obscure and potentially devastating.

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Learn to tax code.

    2. Chumby   1 year ago

      Fortunately, the IRS is hiring.

  12. Jerry B.   1 year ago

    "Scenes from New York: Can the city's new subway turnstiles actually thwart fare-beaters?"

    They're trying these in D.C. where fare beating is also endemic. The jumpers just seem to take it as a challenge to be defeated.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Resist! fares.

  13. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    Gov. of Oklahoma signs anti-DEI legislation...

    [https://www.news9.com/story/657a0d4e45b5ed12f2531a91/ou-president-responds-to-gov-stitts-dei-executive-order-]

    The order will affect every university in the state; the University Of Oklahoma was among one of the first to respond to the signature.

    "For many of us, this news evokes deep concern and uncertainty about the future, and in many ways, feels like a step backward," the a statement from University of Oklahoma President Joseph Harroz Jr. said. "Though we are obligated to comply with the governor’s executive order, we will remain committed to ensuring an education from the University of Oklahoma remains accessible and available to all, and we will continue to work to recruit and retain a workforce of talented and qualified minds that is representative of our state."

    Democratic lawmakers from Stillwater and Norman also responded to the governor's executive order.

    Senator Boren from Norman says that this will impact business expansion in Oklahoma

    "Governor Kevin Stitt’s claim that ‘Oklahoma is open for business’ cannot be taken seriously by banning future business leaders from learning about diversity, equity, and inclusion on college campuses," Boren said.

    Senator Rosecrants has similar concerns.

    "I wonder if he even cares that this wrong-headed executive order will have a chilling effect on the Oklahoma economy. Corporations looking to invest in Oklahoma will continue to pass us over for more forward-thinking and innovative states which respect the diverse world in which we all live," Rosecrants said.

    [Senator Guildenstern could not be reached for comment].

    I'm stymied to think of reasons why not being allowed to indoctrinate marxist racism on campus is a bad idea.

    1. Nardz   1 year ago

      Meanwhile

      https://twitter.com/VDAREJamesK/status/1735504283284525399?t=0NOO6HAWH_WYu4xZhAoW3Q&s=19

      It's unthinkable, absolutely unthinkable within the GOP to act this way to defend whites. It's even unthinkable to use state power to defend American symbols as aggressively as are those of Israel.

      Again, NO ONE in the GOP is opposed to identity politics. Just not for whites.

      [Link: "South Dakota has less than 400 Jews and the governor is passing laws that will make criticizing Israel illegal

      Remember it’s legal to criticize all other countries and races

      Why do Americans allow our politicians to serve the needs of Israel before America?"]

      1. Super Scary   1 year ago

        "South Dakota has less than 400 Jews and the governor is passing laws that will make criticizing Israel illegal "

        I can't imagine government officials making crazy laws in favor of a tiny percent of a population. This is entirely unprecedented!

      2. The Margrave of Azilia   1 year ago

        It seems the bill has yet to be introduced; hence no text.

        Which makes it difficult to look up the bill - the news articles simply suggest it's against anti-semitism.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      "Senator Boren from Norman says that this will impact business expansion in Oklahoma"

      Definitely will impede the DEI business.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        NGO grifters hardest hit.

  14. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    I came to post that Supercut but Liz has already done it. She's so wonderful.

    1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      He's gonna steal all the penis foreskins!

  15. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Presidential failson Hunter Biden is now defying congressional subpoenas, refusing to "appear privately for a deposition before Republican investigators" who want to have a little chat with him about his business dealings...

    They're looking for tips.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      What, like on a bar tab?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

        Like anyone in power in Washington pays for drinks.

    2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      If so, they should be talking to Jared Kushner. He's a lot better at it.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        Stuff your TDS up your ass and fuck off.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Keep sucking Biden dick.

        1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

          You're the ones wanting to "fuck Joe Biden". I don't judge...

          1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

            I don’t judge…

            Quit fantasizing, liar.

    3. SRG2   1 year ago

      Not entirely defying it. He's willing to testify in public and I am sure that most of us agree that a public hearing is preferable to a closed-door hearing. Unless you're an excessively partisan scumbag, of course. Then there's the irony of gym Jordan whining about someone not complying with a subpoena.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Hey shrike, he doesn't choose the terms of a subpeona.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Also, please let us know your past statements regarding the depositions for the J6 committee. Don Jr was 40 hours plus a public hearing.

      3. R Mac   1 year ago

        Thanks for your ignorance gov’na shrike, it fuels entertainment.

    4. Chumby   1 year ago

      Just the tip.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    For once, California cops seem able to do what their New York counterparts refuse.

    California is ruled by freeway drivers.

    1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      Speed bumps. These highway blockings wouldn't happen if motorists simply didn't stop.

  17. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    But some are saying that the actual legislation is narrowly tailored and actually does a decent job protecting academic freedom.

    In other words, white supremacy.

    1. Nardz   1 year ago

      https://twitter.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1735659550244491404?t=WX_-KBQfHl23vpavyCgHQA&s=19

      A black man commits a hit-and-run. A white woman intervenes, leading to him assaulting her and in response, she shoots him. A jury composed of 11 black people and a black judge determine it to be premeditated murder.

      Expect a lot more of this going forward.

      1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        Scott Adams and Robin DiAngelo are right. Black and white people just need to stay away from each other as much as is practical.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Lincoln was right, too. Let's boost the population of Liberia (and Linconia--look it up).

        2. The Margrave of Azilia   1 year ago

          I keep encountering friendly black people - doubtless they're concealing the depth of their racism so as to fool whitey?

          1. The Margrave of Azilia   1 year ago

            /sarc

      2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        Yes, but it is the price we willingly pay for the 2nd Amendment.

        1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

          Why are you defending the assaulter?

      3. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        This is fact sensitive. If she started an altercation with him, he was defending himself, and she's unjustified in shooting him as she's the initial aggressor. If she merely walked up to him, or followed him, and he then began the physical altercation with her, he's the initial aggressor and she was defending herself.

        It's 100% legal to follow someone who is in public, and also to confront them for the purpose of having a conversation with them. You don't have a right to not be bothered in public. However, you don't have the right to stalk after someone, intentionally provoke them, and then use them responding to that provocation as a pretext for shooting them.

        There's supposedly some cell phone footage of this, but I can't seem to find it. Seeing that might sway my feelings on this.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          "It’s 100% legal to follow someone who is in public, and also to confront them for the purpose of having a conversation with them."

          Nuh-uh. If you do that to a woman you have committed at least 3rd degree rape.

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            I should add that you can't continually follow someone-that can cross the line into harassment. But simply following someone and telling them you want to talk, that much is legal. I think, depending on the state, the person may need to communicate something asking the person to stop/leave them alone before it becomes harassment.

        2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

          The facts seem to be that she started the altercation in order to prevent him from committing a crime in the form of leaving the scene of a traffic accident he was involved in. He would not have a right to self defense under that circumstance.

          1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

            If he left the scene of a crime, he's not aggressing toward someone else. A second scene somewhere else restarts the fact pattern when determining who is the aggressor. And if he already hit and left the collision, he's already committed the crime of hit-and-run, and she is therefore not preventing anything.

            I'd need to see the video to have an idea about how much the scene unfolded, but if you chase someone down and provoke them into attacking you, you're the aggressor and therefore it's not self-defense.

  18. JesseAz   1 year ago

    Democrat backed Hecklers Veto remains. Newsome cancels cultural staple of the Christmas tree lighting due to threats if protest and violence.

    https://scnr.com/article/newsom-comments-on-decision-to-cancel-state-christmas-tree-lighting-due-to-concern-of-pro-palestinian-demonstrators_b5a4db149ab211ee9c930242ac1c0002

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Mad at Jews in Israel? Attack Christmas trees in California.

      It's a chemjeff sort of sensibility.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Anarchist tyranny is the plan. Disruot, destroy, but scream if anyone pushes back against it.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          It's why red areas need to suppress and harass the left into either shutting up or leaving. Gatekeeping and preventing leftist entryism works, you just need to practice the same political double standard they do, and not take anything they say at face value.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Sigh--really.

            You are probably right, but then we will never have even a semblance of a libertarian society.

            1. tracerv   1 year ago

              Too late my man.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    After a party invitation for elected officials of color was accidentally sent to the entire Boston city council...

    If only the invite was sent also to typical Boston sports fans.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Following the October 7 terrorist attack, Israelis have applied for more than 250,000 gun licenses.

    Have they tried firing off a shotgun from the back deck?

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      Can they lie about their drug use on the application?

      1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

        have they tried stockpiling weapons in a compound with a wannabe rock star?

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Only if they also commit graft and tax fraud.

  21. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    Capitol Police commander who ordered evacuations of Senate and House publishes a statement: ‘J6 was not an insurrection’.

    I’ve been saying publicly for a year that J6 was not an insurrection but not many people would listen. Ironically so, no one would benefit more than I if J6 was an insurrection, as I (Tarik Johnson) was the Commander that ordered and led the evacuations of the Senate and the House during the J6 breach, after begging former Assistant Chief Yogananda Pittman for permission to do so as she sat comfortably in the Commander Center watching the events unfold on CCTV while Chief Steven A Sund was obtaining National Guard approval and getting assistance from local law enforcement agencies.

    Pittman flat out ignored me so I was forced to forge ahead with the evacuations without obtaining approval from her. Three days later I decided to call Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont to report Pittman’s malfeasance and approximately an hour after I got off the phone with the senator I was contacted by the USCP internal affairs section and informed I was suspended. The suspension lasted for 17 months and I was under a USCP gag order not to speak about the events of January 6, 2021 to the media until I separated from the Department.
    I was also required to remain in my house Monday through Friday from the hours of 8am to 4pm and unable to step off my property without notifying the USCP for fear of being disciplined up to and including termination during those 17 months. These are some of many facts USCP Chief J Thomas Manger (who is arguably the most corrupt politician in the country) was brought in to cover-up.

    If presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy would like more facts to disrupt the insurrection narrative, I will inbox his designated representative my personal phone number. God bless our country now and in 2024.

    Tarik K Johnson
    Former Lieutenant US Capitol Police

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      It was a more peaceful protest than all other documented peaceful protests.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        It wasn't even really fiery.

        1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

          Then explain the presence of a fire extinguisher, genius.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Assault fire extinguisher *

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              A black fire extinguisher with extended capacity and the thing that goes up?

    2. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "I was also required to remain in my house Monday through Friday from the hours of 8am to 4pm and unable to step off my property without notifying the USCP for fear of being disciplined up to and including termination during those 17 months."

      What the actual fuck? Just a little light house arrest, no big deal.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Funny how the J6 committee didn't ask him to testify.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

          They were polite and didn't want to get him fired.

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      And for this jeff and sarc laugh and mock those in prison and solitary despite the vast majority committing no violence or vandalism using a law constructed to stop congressional investigation of financial crimes.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

        I no longer read ML's blatherings. What is the point, all he does is just call me a Nazi all day. I have better things to do than to read that crap.

        If you can point to someone who is actually being mistreated by the authorities, then I would be happy to listen and hear the evidence.

        But if the evidence of "mistreatment" is "being treated exactly the same as every other accused perpetrator in a similar situation, it's just that I think conservatives should get special treatment because we're patriots who did nothing more than parade around the Capitol on Jan. 6" then yes, that deserves a mocking and you all can go fuck yourselves.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          "What is the point, all he does is just call me a Nazi all day."

          If you didn't advocate for the policies and practices of the Third Reich we wouldn't be able to call you a Nazi. Don't like being called a Nazi? Stop being one.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          If you can point to someone who is actually being mistreated by the authorities, then I would be happy to listen and hear the evidence."

          Literally in the link you fascist, phony fifty-center.

        3. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

          fuck off ML

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Suck my sack, Nazi.

      2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        You mistake mockery of you for mockery of those you've elevated to religious martyrs.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          No. You've been very clear you support government abuses against people you hate. Even above as an example.

          Again. Pathalogical.

    4. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Amazing. Has this guy been on Tucker?

    5. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      Just the other day, a Colorado judge, after conducting a hearing at which opposing sides presented evidence and argument, concluded that "J6" (assuming here that you accept that this term includes not only the rioting, but also the other acts committed by Trump et al, and the reason why the rioting had been incited in the first place) was indeed an "insurrection" insofar as the Constitution is concerned.

      This guy is no expert on the Constitutional meaning of the term "insurrection".

      Strange that Trump didn't bother to pardon him, though. He had three weeks to think about it. Maybe he decided that would make himself look guilty?

      1. Zeb   1 year ago

        The definition of "insurrection" includes unruly protests that get out of hand?

        1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

          Unruly protests? What happened to "peaceful tourists"?

          1. Zeb   1 year ago

            There were some of them too. But some people committed legitimate crimes that ought to be punished.

      2. Zeb   1 year ago

        And it's not that strange that Trump didn't pardon him since he wasn't charged with or convicted of a crime.

    6. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Just another MAGA election denier, right?

    7. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

      He also said:

      "I saw fighting like I'd never seen before in my entire life. They were punching and they were swinging, they were throwing water bottles, they were throwing smoke bombs, gas bombs...

      I kept it [a MAGA hat] on. I was on the West Front. And I saw more violence combined that day than my entire life.

      So, yes, I was scared to death..."

      https://www.npr.org/2023/01/20/1150316026/jan-6-attack-tarik-johonson-former-police

      Maybe an attention seeker?

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

        “I saw fighting like I’d never seen before in my entire life. They were punching and they were swinging, they were throwing water bottles, they were throwing smoke bombs, gas bombs…

        But isn't that a standard part of the Capitol tour? I mean, we have been told they were merely tourists...

        1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

          Oh. I thought he was talking about the senators.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

            Wait, did Antifa plan that too? Wow, they are everywhere.

            1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              Never underestimate the lengths Antifa will go for their sinister ends.

  22. JesseAz   1 year ago

    I want to thank Tom Elliot for posting the video of sarcs talking point source.

  23. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

    Biden administration high-ups have been putting a lot of pressure on Israel lately to bring the military campaign in Gaza to an end,

    I wouldn't take military advice from a nation that *checks notes* hasn't won a war since 1945 despite starting over half a dozen.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      The War on the First Amendment seems to be going pretty well...

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      "We respect women too much to let them off the hook as easily as you did, Mr. Hairsniffer-In-Chief." - IDF

    3. Chumby   1 year ago

      Biden has won several wars against clean shorts.

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        The White House staff couldn't turn the Tide in that messy battle, decided that All was lost and there was nothing to Gain by continuing... now they got Bides in disposables.

        1. Chumby   1 year ago

          Part of a smear campaign. Biden has claimed more victories on clean shorts than actually documented creating a case of stoolen valor.

          1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

            Better stoolen valor than Ashley's stoolen diarrhea.

  24. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The Harrison Bergeron posting will continue until morale (politics) improves...

    And you thought they saw just Orwell as an instruction manual...

  25. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    If elected, Trump may "turn off the Internet."

    He would turn off the thing on which he regularly owns libs?

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      Great, now the Dems are going to cut off the internet in order to fortifiy the elections, stop misinformation, or some other bullshit canard.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        THE INTERNET IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO FREE SPEECH!!!

        Am I doing it right?

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      If the adults in the room lose to Trump he'll take office and do the worst thing they can imagine... the one punishment my tween fears the most....

  26. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

    So now, the CDC is trying out Cohen, who is attempting to brand herself as a relatable messenger who can really speak to Red America.

    She ran the NC covid resposne like she was the love child of Fauci and Welensky. That bitch can die in a fire along with her fucking kids.

  27. a.heroic.dose   1 year ago

    Max Blumenthal has written testimonies of released Israeli hostages, who allege that the greatest threat to their safety was Israeli shelling. Israel appears to have executed a mass Hannibal Directive in an attempt to not have to conduct an embarrassing prisoner swap. Perhaps I should not impugn motive to the Israeli state, but why else try to murder your own citizens?

    Also, note the author's description of Sullivan's efforts in Israel;
    "Biden administration high-ups have been putting a lot of pressure on Israel lately to bring the military campaign in Gaza to an end, pursuing more targeted takeouts of Hamas militants instead."

    What have they been doing up until now? They assassinated an English professor last week, at his sister's house, via missile strike. This is barbaric. No advocate of the non-aggression principle should condone this violence against civilians.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      They would all be alive if Hamas didn't fuck around. Now they are finding out. Where is all your pearl clutching over the violence against civilians committed by Hamas on Oct7 or of the 10,000's of unguided missiles launched at civilian targets inside Israel since?

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        Nothing excuses war crimes--not even other war crimes.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Define war crime, and "civilized" war.

          1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

            I don't have to. They're helpfully defined in numerous international treaties most countries have freely signed up to--including Israel.

            1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              And why exactly do we need to heed to them? Tell us your definition.

      2. BYODB   1 year ago

        I suspect that the poster above thinks that bombing 'colonist' civilians is good while bombing 'brown' people is bad. It's honestly probably about that deep of reasoning.

        Gazans raped, hacked apart, and otherwise opened slaughtered Israeli civilians. If you want to look around for some barbarians, there they are right there in front of you. If you look past them and blame Israel, you have to ignore basically everything Hamas and Gazans have done and start your metrics immediately after the October attack.

        Turns out, A.Heroic.Dose thinks that black people and American Indians simply do not rape, hack apart, or otherwise slaughter anywhere close to enough Americans per year.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          This is, unironically, what leftists actually believe--that anything an "oppressed" person does to an "oppressor" is justified, while the "oppressor" has to fight with one hand tied behind their back.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Sounds like equity.

    2. Zeb   1 year ago

      War sucks. But it happens. Civilians always get fucked over in wars. That's a good reason to be against wars that aren't absolutely necessary. But it's hardly something unique about the Israel-Gaza conflict.

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        We have war crime conventions for a reason. It is not just so you can ignore them when it's convenient.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          But any nation can ignore them if the decide it's in their interest to do so. War is what happens when law and diplomacy is insufficient to solve a dispute between political entities. I guess it's admirable to try to discourage war atrocities. But the whole idea of laws of war is kind of nonsensical when you think about what war actually is.

          1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

            Ignore prison, if you can.

            1. Nobartium   1 year ago

              Many a war criminal has. Tough tittes for the tru-beliefers in the global order.

            2. Zeb   1 year ago

              You can't put a nation in prison. And generally, only people on the losing side do time for war crimes.
              And my point here isn't to excuse any kind of behavior. I just think it's naïve to think that there can be rules of war. War is what happens when the rules break down (or one side decides they don't care about the rules).

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Has max released said testimonies and statements from the hostages?

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        I mean not even CNN is going with your claims.

        https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/27/middleeast/israel-hamas-hostages-testimony-conditions-intl/index.html

        And just looked up Max's claims. He is posting all hamas propaganda including the claim of a concert goer killed by an Israeli tank based on a picture of them seeking cover behind the tank.

        Lol.

    4. Sevo   1 year ago

      "...Perhaps I should not impugn motive to the Israeli state, but why else try to murder your own citizens?..."

      Perhaps you might try to be a decent human being, asshole.

    5. mad.casual   1 year ago

      No advocate of the non-aggression principle should condone this violence against civilians.

      Are you calling for aggression to stop them or just teargassing every elevator full of people you can find? You fucking asshat.

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        Is that rant supposed to be coherent?

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          I called a.heroic.dose a fucking asshat. If you thought I was addressing you, that's on you.

    6. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      Israel has the right idea. When hostages are taken, the primary goal should be to kill the hostage takers. If you can recover the hostages alive, that's a bonus. Negotiations, ransoms, and exchanges just encourage more hostage taking.

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        That is not even close to what Israel is doing. They are doing everything you say encourages more hostage taking: negotiating with the terrorists and freeing criminals to get their hostages released. I'm surprised they haven't also paid HAMAS ransom.

        1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

          Israel took the low-hanging fruit with a low-cost exchange then immediately resumed the killing. At his point they believe they have killed some of the hostages.

    7. Agammamon   1 year ago

      I'm sure he does. I'm totes sure.

  28. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    14 percent of Republicans said they had "not too much" or "no confidence at all" in "scientists to act in the public's best interest." Fast forward to now, it's up to 38 percent,

    Republicans pray the gay away.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      I couldn't have anything to do with Covid restriction shit, now could it? Nah, that would never cross your CP-addled brain.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        He is really hoping the social studies on minor attracted persons and how sleeping with young kids doesn't harm them gains a foothold.

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      How many masks did you wear for your 36th booster yesterday?

    3. MT-Man   1 year ago

      I'm confused, is it that a dig that's somehow worse than praying the surgical way?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        This is Reason. Prayer is the go-to conservative/wingnutty worthless solution to all sorts of things. Conservatives hate science and many even believe teaching Natural Selection is the "devils work". I remember Rick W. Perry have a big prayer session at the Astrodome over the drought in Texas while he was governor.

        Again, this is Reason.com. If I offended you go back to a conservative site.

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

          1. (Impeach Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   1 year ago

            In many ways, Dipshit is the absolute perfect self-appointed de facto spokesman and representative of the current Reason staff. He checks just about every box in the entird list, he's

            A faggot
            A pedophile
            A far lefty
            Loves Soros
            Worships Obama
            Loves and apologizes for the Biden crime family.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          "Conservatives hate science and many even believe teaching Natural Selection is the “devils work”."

          Smart anti-theists like Pluggo know that the only way to real salvation is zero carbon (CO2 IS TOXIC!!!) and doublemasking.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            real salvation

            This is something you theists made up.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
              turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

            2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              This is something you theists made up.

              So eating bugs and living in pods aren't necessary to save us from your climate catastrophe then?
              Do we still need 97 genders not to be racist though?

        3. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

          Which is why the results are drastically different from 2020, when Republicans were different.

        4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          And what site should I go to for state-mandated doctrine, complete with priestly admonitions and holy rites, for pandemics, gender biology, climate science, etc.?

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Why won't people accept Lysenkoism!!!

    5. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    6. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "Fast forward to now, it’s up to 38 percent"

      Being lied to tends to do that.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        And refusing to believe official lies makes it worse.

    7. Truthfulness   1 year ago

      You'll definitely need all the prayers, because as of now we sure as hell don't want you near the children.

  29. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    If elected, Trump may "turn off the Internet.

    Dear Leader must not be questioned or criticized.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Look at you not watching the video again.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Liz even helped you out: "This seems to, uh, misunderstand how internet access works"

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        I LOL'ed at the zoom cut @0:28 after the statement "We're going to see violence the likes of which we didn't even see on Jan. 6th." in the SUPERCUT! video.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Do you have any understanding of how the internet works, or do you just use it to trade child porn pics?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        I know that Fatass Donnie believes that a free press is the "enemy of the people" - meaning him of course.

        He would love to jail any journalist that is critical of him.

        And I am tired of the NN argument. That was 2015.

        1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

          Your quotes belong around free press, not enemy of the people.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          I don't recall him ever saying that about the free press. A reminder that the words "free press" don't apply to DNC party organs and Media Matters branch offices like the ones in Liz's post, shill.

          You're like Goebbels complaining that Hindenburg was attacking the free press because he constantly shit on Der Sturmer.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            Oh, Donnie just said "press" then. But everyone knows we have a free press so the meaning is the same.

            Donnie the Pompous Asshole just can't handle criticism.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
              But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

            2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              "But everyone knows"

              This is the classic tell that Buttplug has simply started making shit up. Which one of those on the supercut Liz posted was you, Plugly?

              1. Sevo   1 year ago

                Yep, turd lies.

            3. Chumby   1 year ago

              Do you blame Trump for getting your original account banned?

        3. R Mac   1 year ago

          No, you lying pedophile, the corrupt corporate press is the enemy of the people.

        4. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Which administrations have issued subpeona and search warrants in journalists?

        5. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

    4. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      Will turning off the internet include the dark web, SPB?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Oh, noes! Would that force kiddy porn back into crappy photocopies bought at truck stops?

  30. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    Can anyone else no longer edit comments, or is it just me?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      It's not just you. The edit function is broken.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Thanks.
        Back to the old days of double checking before I click submit, I guess.

      2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        Plus the top banner now includes a big blank spot to the right of the orange "r", so you lose a big chunk of screen.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Me too. I guess we have exceeded our seditious comment quota.

    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      It's been broken for at least three days now.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Thanks

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

        I putt it at well over a week.

      3. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Much harder for Tulpa to post as you now.

      4. Agammamon   1 year ago

        I think you mean 'two decades';)

  31. mad.casual   1 year ago

    For once, California cops seem able to do what their New York counterparts refuse.

    Weird that a Jewish-orchestrated protest of the massacre of Jewish civilians on Oct. 7th took this long to materialize on the highways of California. It's almost like they're a destructive, (false) grievance-monger culture that chooses to wallow in their own self-pity and filth and force others to do so rather than moving past any irreconcilable historical inequities and enjoying and allowing others, without even the slightest link to their grievance, to enjoy the conditions and conveyances of the modern era.

  32. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Presidential failson Hunter Biden is now defying congressional subpoenas, refusing to "appear privately for a deposition before Republican investigators"

    Go ahead and agree to the private meeting, Hunter. Whip it out and show it to them. The pictures aren't doing it for them.

    #IMPEACH HUNTER BIDEN!

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      What is it with your fixation on Hunter's penis? Are you jealous or something, Pluggo?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        It was Republicans who held up and submitted a picture of Hunter Biden's Penis during the last hearing.

        MTG to be specific. Boebert is a horned-up bitch I hear. I kind of like her myself. And Nancy Mace is a good Southern Waffle House whore. Very nice!

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          "Boebert is a horned-up bitch I hear. I kind of like her myself. And Nancy Mace is a good Southern Waffle House whore."

          I see that Buttplug has as much respect for women in politics as he has for Black's in the judiciary. Funny that he's pretending he'd actually fuck an adult woman though.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Let's see:
            Feels superior to women and black people.
            Eager to curse out political foes.
            Pushes the bounds of sex, especially with minor.

            A natural fit with Democrats.

        3. Chumby   1 year ago

          And you have been holding on to Hunter’s penis ever since.

  33. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

    Is Hunter Biden defying a subpoena? Seems to me he is willing to speak. Why are Republicans afraid of a public hearing? Would it show how little they actually have in this case?

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      I thought Trump established that defying Congressional subpoenas was totes okay now.

      1. Agammamon   1 year ago

        Brother, your team was a bunch of pussies who never actually subpoened Trump.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Which subpoena did Trump defy?

        Jeff was cratered that his J6 committee failed.

    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      It seems they want a private meeting so they can get all "personal" with Hunter.

      "Hunter, where can my wife find a pool-boy like you?"

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        "It seems they want a private meeting so they can get all “personal” with Hunter."

        Or to put his dad in jail, but you keep wanking to whatever keeps you going.

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      The normal sequence is deposition first, then public hearing. This is the process Democrats started. Congressional hearings have limited time, depositions do not. Don Jr was depositions over multiple days for 40 hours. He then testified publicly. Those are the rules your team chose. More can be asked in a depositions than limited time in congressional settings.

      Weird how you expect a different process here.

      1. Super Scary   1 year ago

        "Those are the rules your team chose."

        And that is the worst thing you can do: make them play by the rules they chose.

        1. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

          Except there are no rules here, the Chairman decides, and both sides chose that.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            To repeat, you stupid Democrat shill:

            The normal sequence is deposition first, then public hearing. This is the process Democrats started.

            1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

              You think the House is bound in some way to follow the rules implemented by a previous Congress? Interesting.

              1. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

                If the House Republicans had followed Democratic precedents, they have picked a Speaker on a single vote and would have keep the Speaker through the term. They would also have gotten votes through the House.

              2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Bound or not, if your side doesn't like it, you shouldn't have set the precedent--but considering what happened after Reid killed the judge filibuster, or your side's efforts to do the same thing for all legislation, there's too little future -time orientation to see the consequences.

      2. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

        There are no rules here. The Committee Chairman can decide as he wishes. Congress has hearings all the time where people come in to publicly testify with no private deposition. Where the college Presidents recently testifying privately deposed beforehand? No. You are going nowhere here. The fact is that Republican don't want a public hearing because it would show there is no case.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          The fact is that Republican don’t want a public hearing because it would show there is no case.

          Magnificent circular reasoning from the Democat shill.

          1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

            Blah, blah, blah, insult.

            So much better than admitting you're wrong!

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              Blah blah blah.

              You haven't even proven that, faggot.

            2. Sevo   1 year ago

              Nothing you don't deserve.

          2. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

            No circular reasoning here. The Republicans have nothing to show, and Hunter's testimony will give them no more. Straight as an arrow flies.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              You do realize that begging the question is circular reasoning, right, shill?

        2. Agammamon   1 year ago

          If there's no case - then why is Biden scared of the deposition?

          Why not go in and just plead the 5th?

          1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

            Who knows? Who cares? If he goes to jail for defying a subpoena, it's on him, isn't it?

            1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              You're shilling for Biden, you don't think the scenario threatens you?

        3. JesseAz   1 year ago

          They chose to continue the rules Nancy put in place. They decided for normalcy of execution. Yet you still cry about it. Almost like you are a Democrat posing as neutral like Jeff and sarc.

          Now what about the rest. More questioning vs political theater? Congress is not the correct avenue for what is garnered in a deposition.

          1. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

            What I am is a tax paying citizen who is pissed off that my tax money is going to this crap. The Republican can't get the budget done but they can hold frivolous hearing. And yes, during Nancy Pelosi's Speaker ship there were hearings, but they were bipartisan and produced facts. More importantly the House got budgets completed.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              Yes, you're frequently upset when Republicans do things. For some odd reason, for a supposed "moderate," this outrage never goes in the other direction.

              1. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

                If you check the record, I am pretty much don't like extremes in either party. The fact is that Nancy Pelosi is center left and not far left. She got the work that was needed done. I think this impeachment investigation is BS. I would say little about it if the Republicans has first gotten the budget work done.

    4. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Republicans also agreed to a public hearing after the deposition retard.

      Why did Biden in 2021 say those who defied a subpeona should be criminally charged?

      1. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

        The question remains has Hunter defied a subpoena? Would a court hold that refusing private testimony in favor of public testimony constitutes refusal to comply. Is there any case law to support a contempt charge under these circumstances?

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Whatever hurts your side is what's appropriate.

        2. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

          Legal scholars disagree on whether Congress can subpoena witnesses at all for hearings that do not serve a legislative purpose.

          1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

            Well, they tend to cast a wide net on that...

            1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              That doesn't refute what Vernon Depner said.

        3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          You should ask Joe these questions.

        4. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Yes. He defied the fucking subpeona.

    5. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Yes. He is openly defying a congressional subpoena.

      1. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

        Opinion not fact. Can you cite case law to support your opinion

        1. BYODB   1 year ago

          Did he show up when subpoenaed? No?

          Then he defied it. Not being there is your answer.

          1. Moderation4ever   1 year ago

            He was there at the Capital and was open to public testimony. So, I would say he met the principles of the subpoena.

            1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              That's not how subpoenas work. Don't be so dishonest.

  34. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

    "I'm not just the C.D.C. director, I'm also a mom," Mandy K. Cohen told a Fox station in Dallas last month. Her daughters already got their COVID vaccines, "so I wouldn't recommend something for the American people I wouldn't recommend for my own family," she said.

    New German study which shows the latest booster has zero effect on death, only provides limited protection from infection for three months, and then for the six months following that, results in increased likelihood of infection. Fuck off with your boosters.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      That is not entirely accurate. This is from the study:

      We observed a 21% lower all-cause mortality risk in individuals with four versus three vaccine doses (37% when we excluded nursing home residents), suggesting healthy vaccinee bias especially in the community-dwelling population, albeit much lower as in a study from Israel.23

      1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

        We had to parse the data to make it look better by removing the group most likely to die from covid, the elderly. Meanwhile, for the all participants:

        rVE for four versus three vaccine doses was −24% (95% CI: −120 to 30) against COVID-19 deaths, and 17% (95% CI: 14–19) against SARS-CoV-2 infections.

        You are MORE likely to die if you had four shots instead of three.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Wonder if that's what happened to that kid in Israel, Yonatan Moshe Erlichman, who was the face of the Pfizer vaccination campaign there, and had a heart attack and drowned in his tub at the age of 9.

          Safe and effective with no downsides!

          1. Chumby   1 year ago

            At least he has gone to a zero carbon lifestyle.

          2. Roberta   1 year ago

            He's a hero to every child for proving baths are bad for you.

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

        Analyses in 2023 confirm no rVE for four versus three vaccine doses for COVID-19 mortality (4%, 95% CI: −31 to 29), but show higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections with a rVE of −17% (95% CI: −19 to −15) (Table 4). Until 30 June 2023, 536,376 individuals had received the fourth vaccine dose, with thus only relatively few additional fourth vaccinations in 2023. rVE of the fourth vaccination versus all less vaccinated groups gradually declined from November 2022 to June 2023 (Figure 1 and Table S6).

        Table: (4 doses/3 doses/1 or two vaccine doses/unvaccinated)

        doses: 4 3 1 0
        COVID-19 deaths (n) 95 75 26 29

        In previously infected individuals, a fourth vaccination was not associated with COVID-19 death risk, but with transiently reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections and reversal of this effect in longer follow-up. All-cause mortality data suggest healthy vaccinee bias.

      3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        "That is not entirely accurate."

        Classic chemjeff. It is accurate, but he let's the word "entirely" do all the heavy lifting so he can post a blurb out of context.

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Adapted from "Let's agree to disagree on gun control"-
      Mandy Cohen: Get jabbed.
      Me: No. And if you or any of your goons try it I'm going to be compelled to put them in the dirt.
      Mandy Cohen: I wouldn't recommend something for the American people that I wouldn't recommend for my own family.
      Me: Are you using your own children as human shields?

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        You think someone was actually going to hold you down and inject you with a vaccine?

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          You think the US government has never inoculated people with infectious diseases?

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      I wouldn't recommend something for the American people that I wouldn't recommend for my own family.

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        I don't click on video links (or dark web links, unlike some of your pals, lol), but let's just hope that's not a link to the Zieglers' home videos...

        1. Super Scary   1 year ago

          It's a link to a youtube clip of Blazing Saddles. The only links you need to worry about on this site are from the bots and anyone trying to push their little blog.

        2. mad.casual   1 year ago

          My reading of it is that the DNC wants him to step down not because of any alleged rape in their own home but because they didn't advocate for such behavior in public schools.

          Which is waaay creepier than any dark web links you, for some reason, feel compelled to come here and lie to us that you don't click on.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        "Isn't anybody gonna help that poor man?"

        "Oh, baby, you are so talented--and they are so dumb!"

    4. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      I mean, there's parents who think it's okay for their kids to get their genitals and their breasts whacked off while being injected with puberty blockers and hormones for nothing more than cosmetic purposes (and I'm 99% certain Cohen is one of them), so it's not like this sort of "for my own family" recommendation has any merit.

  35. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

    Until our public health agencies are fully rid of people who violated our civil liberties, and until those agencies admit their wrongdoing,

    Well there's the rub. None of the bolsheviks running these agencies thinks any mistakes were made.

    1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Facts actually did CHANGE! The Truth went from one thing to something completely different, and they were only following the Truth the whole time!

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Ah, the wisdom of our elite betters.

  36. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

    "A plurality of swing-state Generation Z voters—those born in 1997 or later—say Biden is not doing enough to address the burden of student loan payments, even after he has erased $127 billion in such debt in initiatives that are widely thought to be aimed at locking in that key demographic," reports Bloomberg. I might scream.

    Why would you scream. The generation that thinks the Holodomor was good thing and... fuck it... It's friday. I can't be bothered.

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      It seems to be a generation which expects everything should be done for them, so of course no "half-measures" are going to be good enough.

      I blame the parents.

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        Parents aren't the ones who're promoting ideas like having someone else pay for your school... that's the government.

  37. Sevo   1 year ago

    "S.F. DA Brooke Jenkins faces blowback after saying homeless people should be made ‘uncomfortable’"
    [...]
    "San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins is taking heat for recent controversial comments that homeless people “have to be made to be uncomfortable,” a reference to the idea that regularly sweeping encampments encourages unhoused people to accept offers of shelter..."
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/brooke-jenkins-homeless-uncomfortable-18547794.php

    Note she was only referring to the bums refusing free shelter, not to the worthless lay-abouts in general.
    Their parents didn't do them the favor; someone should. With a firehose, perhaps.

  38. tracerv   1 year ago

    Next story - IF TRUMP IS ELECTED, HE WILL CUT OFF YOUR OXYGEN! YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO BREATHE!!!

    1. Ska   1 year ago

      But breathing causes global warming - quite the conundrum.

    2. Super Scary   1 year ago

      Well breathing contributes to global warming, so maybe it's for the best if Trump took away our oxygen.

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      "But will I have internet?" - Elizabeth Nolan Brown

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        can babies still be killed?

        1. Chumby   1 year ago

          Coat hanger app?

    4. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      "There's no limit to what he could do. He could destroy the Earth."—Klaatu

    5. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      There's no need for exaggeration. Trump's own words are quite sufficient.

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        What are those words, then? Get at it.

    6. Chumby   1 year ago

      All will be sent on a lung march

  39. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    "Biden administration high-ups have been putting a lot of pressure on Israel lately to bring the military campaign in Gaza to an end, pursuing more targeted takeouts of Hamas militants instead."

    By all means, let's have a civilized war. After all, that is the DNC style, for wars and trying to nullify presidential elections.

  40. Nobartium   1 year ago

    Maybe major news outlets shouldn't justify segregation.

    Hard disagree. Integration was a mistake. The left has come full circle on it, so all the efforts to erase color were wasted.

    1. tracerv   1 year ago

      But think about all that "green" redistribution. That's really the only color that matters to them.

  41. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

    Oklahoma's governor signed an executive order prohibiting offices of diversity, equity, and inclusion on college campuses. But some are saying that the actual legislation is narrowly tailored and actually does a decent job protecting academic freedom.

    I believe the overturning of affirmative action also kind of sort of barred offices of Diversity, Inclusion and Equity...

  42. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seems to think that if we just appoint a normie mom to the head spot, all will be well again. Not so.

    "I'm not just the C.D.C. director, I'm also a mom," Mandy K. Cohen told a Fox station in Dallas last month. Her daughters already got their COVID vaccines, "so I wouldn't recommend something for the American people I wouldn't recommend for my own family," she said.'

    Fuck you and the modern Democratic Party who wants to be our mommy, but with Stalinesque policies and power. And I hope someday your daughters denounce you.

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      And in a normal world, that would simply be a good reason to vote for a decent Republican instead.

      However, in a world in which all the decent Republicans have been swept from the board, the calculus has to be different.

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        You're mistaken. A guy like DeSantis is far preferable to whoever's running the CDC right now.

  43. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

    We live in the era of the Handicapper General

    You know what I like about Liz Wolfe? She's willing to dip her toe, ever so carefully into the stormy waters of KulturWar hurr durrr...

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      I hope she is not so naive to believe that [this lot] won't also viciously turn on her if she gives them any reason to doubt her total loyalty to the cause.

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        There's good reason as to why people viciously turned on ENB, you know.

  44. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    '"A plurality of swing-state Generation Z voters—those born in 1997 or later—say Biden is not doing enough to address the burden of student loan payments, even after he has erased $127 billion in such debt in initiatives that are widely thought to be aimed at locking in that key demographic," reports Bloomberg. I might scream.'

    New Liz continues to impress.

    And if anyone has suggestions for what we can do beyond screaming, let's hear them.

  45. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

    Profoundly frustrated (but not surprised) by how The New York Times' podcast, The Daily, made Rep. Elise Stefanik's (R–N.Y.) questioning of elite college presidents over how they handle antisemitism on campus into…a moment that shows few problems with higher ed administrators, but rather, apparently, an attempt by Stefanik to redirect from opponents' accusations that she dabbles in "great replacement" theory talk.

    My problem with Stefanik is that she sounded exactly like an AWFL shrieking about climate change, transphobia, or microaggressions.

  46. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

    For once, California cops seem able to do what their New York counterparts refuse.

    I'm sure the IDF is going to absolutely change their strategy in order to ease the California traffic situation.

    Seriously, though, how are the front four rows of drivers not systematically throwing those people, one after the other, over the side of the bridge?

    1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      You're too humane. I would just run over them.

      1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        Might break a headlight.

  47. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    '"After a party invitation for elected officials of color was accidentally sent to the entire Boston city council, Mayor Michelle Wu spoke to media about carving out spaces for communities of color," reads a hilarious tweet from NBC News. Maybe major news outlets shouldn't justify segregation.'

    How dare you! Learn to anti-racist already!

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      ps. Where else can the city council bitch about Whitey while getting drunk on the tax-payer's tab?

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia...

  48. Dillinger   1 year ago

    I can't believe I gotta deal with thinking about dead Snoopy all day thanks a lot guys.

  49. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    "The Harrison Bergeron posting will continue until morale (politics) improves"

    In the woke remake do white men have to wear dark makeup and cross dress in order to feel the equalized burdens of the oppressed?

  50. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    "Presidential failson Hunter Biden is now defying congressional subpoenas, refusing to "appear privately for a deposition before Republican investigators" who want to have a little chat with him about his business dealings, per the Associated Press."

    Wow! Liz snuck a mention in!
    Nobody let KMW or Charles Koch know...

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      I was going to say that all I see is a professional just objectively reporting on the AP's headlines but that actually might also get her singled out for unwanted attention.

    2. Chumby   1 year ago

      Meanwhile at Koch Industries HQ, present day

      Staffer: Sir, the new Roundup editor has turned into a lone Wolfe. She’s full libertarian. The Biden backers are changing narratives every forty-eight hours.

      CK: Good good. Let the hate flow through them.

      Staffer: Sir. Soros is on line 2 again.

      CK: Tell that nazi I’m on the can and take a message.

  51. Agammamon   1 year ago

    ""Sullivan did not specify a timetable," per The New York Times, "but four U.S. officials said Mr. Biden wants Israel to switch to more precise tactics in about three weeks."

    "The new phase that the Americans envision would involve smaller groups of elite forces that would move in and out of population centers in Gaza, carrying out more precise missions to find and kill Hamas leaders, rescue hostages and destroy tunnels, the officials said," reports the Times."

    And Israel should listen to the US on counter-insurgency/terrorism strategy why exactly?

    Because we have a 20 year history of failing miserably at it.

    And the Biden admin wants Israel to do 'elite teams doing targeted strikes'? They're not allowed to just drone the population willy-nilly? Like we did? How many 'elite teams' did we deploy to do 'targeted strikes' over the last 20 years vice just bombing some group of bystanders if someone so much as thought they caught a glimpse of a terrorist on the monitor?

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      Because we give them billions of our taxpayers' dollars, maybe?

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        Has the thought ever occurred to you that those massive amount of war funds should be put to good use and that Biden's ideas won't fulfill that? Hmm?

    2. BYODB   1 year ago

      Empires have a sorry history of dealing with guerrilla's, ironically including our own split from England.

      Obama surely showed what an Imperialist Presidency looks like.

      Drone strikes for me but not for thee.

  52. Dillinger   1 year ago

    Cheney Warns "Checks & Balances Won't Stop Trump

    if she isn't in the new Civil War movie it was a major casting gaffe.

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      What would it take to shut that harpy up?

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        there's a joke about my enemy's dick in there but I'm not making it.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Whether they would actually stop him or not, Lizzie's got a lot sand saying anything like that when she's fully on board with having an unaccountable surveillance state.

  53. Agammamon   1 year ago

    "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seems to think that if we just appoint a normie mom to the head spot, all will be well again. Not so.

    "I'm not just the C.D.C. director, I'm also a mom," Mandy K. Cohen told a Fox station in Dallas last month. Her daughters already got their COVID vaccines, "so I wouldn't recommend something for the American people I wouldn't recommend for my own family," she said."

    Because they don't have any new ideas - they've been run by 'normie moms' for decades now. And no one turns into a mask-wielding Karen faster than a normie-mom with a little bit of power.

    1. Agammamon   1 year ago

      "an attempt by Stefanik to redirect from opponents' accusations that she dabbles in "great replacement" theory talk."

      The hilarious part about all this is that Democrats simultaneously openly use 'great replacement theory' talk - even celebrate it - while trying to demonize Republicans when they point out what the Democrats are openly bragging about doing and utterly open about their goal to eliminate white people in this country.

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        You want to try that again?

        Pointing out that the demography is changing is not exactly the same thing as saying there's a devilish conspiracy to change the demography for political benefit.

        You could choose to embrace these non-white people, and make them feel as American as everyone else, but instead you fear them and push them away. And then you're surprised when they vote against you...

        1. Agammamon   1 year ago

          Uh, mate, open borders is predicated at least partially on the idea that we're not having enough babies thus we need to import replacement workers.

          That's on top of the talk about how we need to 'eliminate whiteness'.

          You don't need a bunch of people affirmatively colluding when they all 'have an understanding'. That's what this is.

          "You could choose to embrace these non-white people, and make them feel as American as everyone else, but instead you fear them and push them away. And then you’re surprised when they vote against you…"

          You could choose to understand who I am and where and how I live - among Mexicans, my family is Mexican, my friends are Mexicans, 90% of the people I deal with on a day-to-day are Mexicans - or you can make stupid assumptions about people in order to feel good about your own prejudices.

  54. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Hostages remain

    thank you.

    >>National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan is in Tel Aviv, meeting with Israeli officials

    begging them to stop.

  55. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Mayor Michelle Wu spoke to media about carving out spaces for communities of color

    lunch counter owners of the world, unite and take over!

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      The hilarious part is the these American Maoists are so completely unselfaware. "Carving out spaces" is literal segregation.

      The infuriating part is that they want to impose this shit on the entire nation, going in only one direction. A society with a backbone would have shoved every single one of them into woodchipper by now.

      1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        Such a society would probably not be a democracy.

        1. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

          But it could remain the Democratic Republic it once was.

  56. Agammamon   1 year ago

    "Oklahoma's governor signed an executive order prohibiting offices of diversity, equity, and inclusion on college campuses. But some are saying that the actual legislation is narrowly tailored and actually does a decent job protecting academic freedom."

    Its almost like DeSantis is leading the way.

    Except more 'its horrible in Florida and DeSantis is why' articles from Reason in the near future.

  57. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>"I'm not just the C.D.C. director, I'm also a mom,"

    exponentially more terrifying.

  58. Agammamon   1 year ago

    "Back in 2021, only 150,000 private citizens held gun licenses out of Israel's total population of 9 million. Following the October 7 terrorist attack, Israelis have applied for more than 250,000 gun licenses."

    If they weren't complete pussies then there would be *zero* 'license' applications and the licensing centers would be burnt to the ground.

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      Police stations? Government offices?

      1. Agammamon   1 year ago

        Yes.

  59. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>But some are saying that the actual legislation is narrowly tailored and actually does a decent job protecting academic freedom.

    does it, actually?

  60. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Anyone else having problems with the edit function? I have tried on two different posts, within seconds, and neither edit worked.

    1. Dillinger   1 year ago

      hasn't worked all week I left a hanging quote up there it's driving my ocd bananas lol

      1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

        Better than leaving a hanging chad.

        1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

          We can't hang Chad. It has to be lethal injection now.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            What about state-assisted voluntary suicide?

  61. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Da Meatball to the rescue!

    Freedom of Religion? Not in Iowa!

    DeSantis vows to help man charged with beheading Iowa Capitol’s Satanic Temple statue

    https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4362025-iowa-capitol-satanic-temple-statue-vandalism-desantis/

    The Satanic Temple display was permitted under Iowa law allowing any religious organization to hold a display inside the Capitol. It consisted of a figure of the demon Baphomet with a bejeweled goat head alongside prayer candles.

    Theists angry!

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Anti-theists angry. You wouldn't have just created yourselves a religion based on trolling Christians and screaming "Fuck you, Dad!" if you weren't.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        Tbe whole exercise is to show the absurdity and injustice of Government giving it's support and to religion. If a Government can have a copy of The Ten Commandments in front of a City Hall or a creche at Christmas, doesn't Baphomet or better yet, the Biblical Satan--a creation of JHVH-1--deserve equal time?

        By the way, endless generations of Dads have brought us to this mess of a world. Some of them need a "Fuck You, Dad!" (Looking at you, Biden, Putin, et. al.)

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          It's solely about being assholes, any pretense of deeper meaning is just that.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

            Chrisendom has been exercising State-sponsored assholery since 385 C.E. and Islam has done so since it's inception.

            If it takes a Billy Goat gettin' his Gruff on to get rid of Abrahamic assholery in Government, then I say head-butt away!

            I'll happily send some Horny Goat Weed to The Satanic Temple so they can have some sexy rituals to keep their morale on the up-and-up, so to speak.
            🙂
            😉

            1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              People have a right to put religious symbols in their offices if they so desire and request that others be out, and actually remove it if they succeed in convincing enough people to do so.

              You want laïcité. You do not believe in the freedom of religion.

    2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      Too bad it wasn't a statue of L. Ron Hubbard, eh?

      1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        That statue could have him in front of a volcano shooting light that looks like lava and include his "E-Meter" for passers-by to check themselvee fir "Engrams."
        🙂
        😉
        Or maybe the whole space should be devoted to a Police/Emergency 911 phone for those whose smartphone is broken. That would be more fitting with a Secular Libertarian form of Government and, with competant personnel, at least may have better results than prayer.

  62. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12868627/idf-paratrooper-replace-george-santos-republican-long-island.html

    The ex-IDF paratrooper who could replace George Santos as the Republican in Long Island: Mother-of-seven Ethiopian refugee who fled to Israel at 12, signed up to fight and then moved to the U.S. and got into politics
    Mazi Melesa Pilip left for Israel in covert military airlift in 1991 amid civil war
    She served two years as a paratrooper in the Israel Defence Force
    Now Republicans see her as a future star as she runs for Congress

    Could she be a contender?

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Sounds like a white supremacist to me.

    2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      The same voters who voted for Santos in the first place are going to vote in the election? Well...

    3. Agammamon   1 year ago

      She's too 'yt'. They freaked the fuck out about that black lt governor that had a picture taken holding a rifle.

  63. Z Crazy   1 year ago

    It's been eleven years since the murders at the Newton School in Sand Hook, Connecticut.

    What did Congress do about gang violence in the ghetto? Nothing.

    In fact, some places actually defunded the police. Isn't that crazy or what?

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      Not a false flag, then?

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/how-the-gun-control-debate-ignores-black-lives/80445/

        Two weeks after Obama unveiled his plan, McBride and dozens of other clergy members, many of them from cities struggling with high rates of gun violence, met again with staffers from Vice President Biden’s task force.

        The mood at the January 29 meeting was tense. Many of the attendees, including McBride, felt the president’s agenda had left out black Americans.

        “The policy people working for Biden worked with the reality of Congress,” said Teny Gross, one of the original Boston Miracle outreach workers who now leads the Institute for Nonviolence Chicago. “What they were proposing to us was very limited and was not going to help the inner city.”

        Gross said he “blew a gasket.” The clergy members in the room were pleading for help. “We bury hundreds of kids every year in the inner city,” Gross recalled them telling the administration representative. “Some of the solutions need to apply to us.”

        A staffer said that the political will of the country was not focused on urban violence, several ministers who attended the meeting recalled.

        1. Z Crazy   1 year ago

          That's outrageous!

          And where was the Black Lives Matter? Why weren't they raising holy hell about this!

          1. BYODB   1 year ago

            BLM only matters when it suits the agenda of the ruling class, which goes for just about every alphabet group.

            It's kind of sad how organizations that are started for special interests quickly pivot to supporting the interests of the people in charge of those organizations rather than the rank and file.

    2. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      Congress has no Constitutional authority to do anything about gang violence in the inner cities. The fact that Congress has routinely done lots of unconstitutional things affecting inner cities - and everything else in America and around the world - for decades simply means that they get to pick and choose which unconstitutional things they want to do. Holding a finger to the wind to see which way it's blowing is the only skill most of them have. There are over four thousand Federal laws, rules and regulations in the CFR almost all of which are unconstitutional, which means that the DoJ and the FBI get to pick and choose the targets of their abuse.

  64. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

    https://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/2023/12/14/23999428/illinois-naacp-president-teresa-haley-migrants-savages-rapists-burglars
    LOLOLOL!
    Illinois NAACP president apologizes after likening migrants to ‘savages,’ rapists, burglars

    1. DesigNate   1 year ago

      So what you're saying is that the Illinois NAACP president is a Mega MAGA?

  65. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

    Here is a link to the complaint by X against Media Matters.

    chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/

    1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454.1.0_1.pdf

  66. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    Just wondering; how many American hostages has Biden's negotiations freed?

    Maybe he should sit down and shut up.

  67. DesigNate   1 year ago

    "The Harrison Bergeron posting will continue until morale (politics) improves:

    We live in the era of the Handicapper General"

    As if we needed further proof that you are the best.

  68. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    From an email sent out by the dean of the university, where I volunteer as an honorary proferssor:

    "It is wonderful to see the variety of contexts people are bringing forward to create their own eclectic path in ways that address topics that truly matter in education in their own contextualized setting."

    Can somebody help me translate this?

    1. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      It's word salad. It's not meant to be sorted and parsed, just consumed as-is.

    2. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      Written by ChatGPT

    3. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      No. Next question ...

    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

      Jeff really, really, really understands nuance of the nonsense type.

  69. nobody 2   1 year ago

    So the new CDC director is either a liar or a sociopath who's willing to endanger her own children for political advantage.

    1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

      That's pretty much the job description.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Trump Cut Funds From Wasteful Projects To Spend on Wasteful Statue Garden

Joe Lancaster | 6.3.2025 3:50 PM

Is It 'Harassment' To Heckle Your Local Politician? A British Court Thinks So.

Matthew Petti | 6.3.2025 3:01 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!