Over 100,000 Abused Immigrant Kids Are Stuck in Green Card Limbo
They face yearslong wait times, keeping them at risk of deportation.

In 1990, Congress created a humanitarian protection that allows abused, abandoned, and neglected young immigrants to receive green cards and launch new, safe lives in the U.S.—in theory. In reality, impacted young people face a yearslong wait before they can get their green cards, during which they're at risk of deportation and unable to make long-term plans.
The protection is called Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS), and thanks to a strange technicality in the law, a staggering number of young people are stuck in limbo, harmed by the very process that Congress created to protect them.
When Congress established SIJS, it put that status under the employment-based visa umbrella. "There's really no legislative history that we could find that explains why humanitarian protection for children is placed in the employment-based visa system," says Rachel Davidson, director of the End SIJS Backlog Coalition at the National Immigration Project. That classification means SIJS youth are subject to per-country and per-year caps. Once a year's green cards are delegated, impacted young immigrants who don't receive one simply have to wait. As more qualify for the status and apply each year, the backlog grows.
A report released last week by Davidson's End SIJS Backlog Coalition and Tulane University's Immigrant Rights Clinic found that the number of children stuck in the backlog has more than doubled in just two years. Over 100,000 young immigrants are now trapped, facing a wait time of five years or more before they can get a green card.
"Until recently, the size of the SIJS backlog was not publicly available," according to the report. Milbank LLP filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to obtain the data this report is based on. "Milbank has represented SIJS clients for decades so we have seen first-hand how the backlog has negatively impacted our [clients'] lives," says Anthony Perez Cassino, pro bono counsel at Milbank. "Kids who were abandoned and neglected are now in limbo and put into unstable environments."
There are three steps before an immigrant youth receives a green card through the SIJS process, explains Rachel Prandini, a staff attorney for the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. A state court judge must first determine "that a child needs court intervention, whether that's placement in the child welfare system or a custody order for the child; that the child can't reunify with one or both parents because of abuse, neglect, or abandonment; and that it's not in the child's best interest to return to their country of origin," she says.
Next, the child applies for SIJS with USCIS. (The new report notes that USCIS currently takes 263 days on average to approve an SIJS petition—a violation of the 180-day deadline required by law.) "If that's approved, then that creates eligibility to apply for their green card," says Prandini. "But that's where you need a visa to be available before you can apply for a green card." Young immigrants could historically apply for SIJS and a green card at the same time or very close together. Now, however, they have to wait years between those two steps.
"Right now, the way the system works, we know who is eligible to get out of the backlog retrospectively," says Laila Hlass, a law professor at Tulane University who co-authored the new SIJS report with Davidson, Tulane law student Katia Leiva, and Immigrant Justice Corps fellow Gabriela Cruz. "Prospectively, we think it's only going to get worse and worse and worse."
It's very difficult for young immigrants to live in the U.S. solely with SIJS. "The government does not believe that it provides lawful immigration status," Prandini explains. "They view it as just creating eligibility to apply for a green card. So on its own, it doesn't provide protection from removal and it doesn't come with work authorization."
A lack of work authorization means that impacted young people "are going to have to be in the unregulated workplace," says Hlass. "We heard from young people who had unsafe jobs, who were being exposed to chemicals without safety gear, who were just working any job that they could get."
Many SIJS youth deal with severe financial and emotional distress as a result of the backlog. "I don't think about the future anymore because I don't want to have false hope," said an impacted young person who was interviewed for the SIJS report. One youth from Georgia, who faced violence inside and outside the home, noted that he hoped to "start healing the other things that have been messed up" after he gets his green card. "But the longer it takes," he continued, "the harder it is going to be for me to fix everything."
In early 2022, the Biden administration announced a deferred action policy, which granted some SIJS youth the ability to apply for work authorization. It also deferred removal proceedings. Advocates say that the policy was a welcome bit of relief but note that it's imperfect. It's a case-by-case measure, and it isn't permanent. Any lasting solution will need to come from Congress.
This June, Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D–Calif.), Jimmy Gomez (D–Calif.), and Adriano Espaillat (D–N.Y.) introduced the Protect Vulnerable Immigrant Youth Act. The targeted bill would exempt SIJS kids from the annual numerical limits on employment-based visas.
"With reports that the youth backlog has more than doubled in just two years, it is more important than ever for Congress to stop ignoring immigrant children and, instead, pass sensible bills like the Protect Vulnerable Immigrant Youth Act," Lofgren, a senior member of the House immigration subcommittee and a former immigration lawyer, tells Reason. "Placing vulnerable immigrant youth in employment-based visa backlogs and subjecting them to arbitrary per-country caps makes no sense, and Congress can correct that."
Until then, Davidson notes that there are several ways the Biden administration can offer relief to impacted young people. It could ensure they get deferred action in a timely manner and rescind removal orders for SIJS youth, among other things. "When they're allowed to be full members of this society, they're going to be not only doing well for themselves," Hlass notes, "but they're supporting family members, they're part of communities that as a whole can begin to prosper more."
"In the grand scheme of things of immigration reform, it's kind of a small piece of the puzzle," says Davidson. "But each of these young people really is an entire world."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I feel a lot better for America's chances, if Limbo were an Island in the South Pacific.
Sounds rough.
Oh well.
That is just what America needs: 100,000 abused, neglected, kids that can't speak English and have no idea of how to make their own living.
We need to grant them citizenship and give them an Obamaphone.
Know what your problem is? You didn't inherit a giant company from your father.
If you had, you wouldn't see 100,000 abused, neglected, kids that can’t speak English. You'd see cheap labor. Lots of it. Decades of it.
That's just wrong.
Isn’t it though?
The left loves slavery.
The right loves DEATH for ALL butt TRUE Rightist Power Pigs!!
(Twat could POSSIBLY go wrong with their schemes for unlimited POWER?!?!?)
Jeff's preference.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/25/us/unaccompanied-migrant-child-workers-exploitation.html
That is actually your preference Jesse - exploited child labor, as long as they are exploited *somewhere else*, out of sight and out of mind.
Again, this is not an argument in good faith.
America cannot fix the world. It is insane to say "We do not want that here" means "We do want it occurring elsewhere". Any more than saying "We do not want this horrible disease in the US" meaning we hope it ravages other countries.
Oh. So would you also consider it an argument not in good faith, to claim that if I want a more permissive immigration policy, that also means I want exploitative child labor in this country?
No, that’s in good faith, as you’ve made that very clear, along with your desire to import more illegals who are child molesters.
The only way to reduce exploitative labor by foreign minors is to impose a restrictive and regulated immigration policy, which of course depends upon greatly improving border security first.
And I’m sure you have a solution for these kids. Placing them with groomers like you and Shreek. And we all know your position on letting illegal alien child molesters have free chess to children in the US. So I’m sure there will be an ample supply of child rapists to service these kids under the Chemjeff plan. Probably with big government handouts.
To be fair, it's not they plan on using them to mine dangerous for rare minerals in the Congo. Farm labor and working in chicken plants is much safer.
Not to mention yard work. Democrats like their lawns to look nice, without paying too much.
Low cost nannies, cheap maids, cost efficient pool boys, the benefits of being virtuous and tolerant are innumerable.
Well, as democrats believe in positive rights, it only stands to reason that they feel as entitled to illegal alien slaves as they did to black slaves so long ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkIcktncrk4
What do you think about what coyotes do to women that they smuggle across our southern border?
Ask them to make some tamales?
Probably nothing very good. You know a great way to stop the smugglers from abusing their customers? Take away their business by making legal immigration easier. What do you think?
“Probably nothing very good.”
Way to take a stand against rapists.
“You know a great way to stop the smugglers from abusing their customers?”
Find out who’s funding the efforts to convince these people that the border’s open and creating the logistics to get giant caravans of people marching towards our border in the first place, and for Democrats to stop announcing that there’s free healthcare when you get here.
“Take away their business by making legal immigration easier.”
I’ll agree our legal immigration system is a shitshow. Wonder why democrats have no interest in solving it. Why do you think?
Find out who’s funding the efforts to convince these people that the border’s open and creating the logistics to get giant caravans of people marching towards our border in the first place,
"Marching", hmm, interesting choice of words there.
Even if there were some single entity organizing and funding these caravans, if the government knew who this entity was, what do you think the government should do about them?
and for Democrats to stop announcing that there’s free healthcare when you get here.
Is there anyone who is saying "come on over *because* you'll get free health care"? I think instead, some Democrats have positions more like "IF an undocumented migrant gets sick in this country, THEN that migrant should get free health care". Which is a different motivation.
In your view, what ought to happen to undocumented migrants who get sick in this country?
I’ll agree our legal immigration system is a shitshow.
Whaddya know, we agree on something.
Wonder why democrats have no interest in solving it. Why do you think?
Democrats, like Republicans, gain a lot of political mileage by demagoguing on the issue. After all, if it wasn't for undocumented migrants, Trump would never have been elected in the first place. Things will only change for the better when the incentives for change become stronger than the incentives for demagoguery on the status quo. One way to help make that happen is to stop feeding the demagogues.
You can’t help being a dishonest piece of shit.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aMSmoNOZJ9Y&pp=ygUpRGVtb2NyYXQgcHJlc2lkZW50IGRlYmF0ZSBmcmVlIGhlYWx0aGNhcmU%3D
Now fuck off Lying Jeffy.
Well, isn't this interesting. This is evidence of your dishonesty.
I asked a question of what the government should do do with information about individuals or entities funding mass migration of individuals to the southern border, you refused to answer it.
I agreed with you that Democrats don't have an incentive to solve the immigration issue, because they gain political mileage from demagoguing the issue.
I asked what you think ought to happen to undocumented migrants who get sick in this country, you refused to answer it.
I also agreed with you that it is the position of many Democrats that they wish to extend 'free' health care benefits to undocumented migrants.
But because I don't agree with your interpretation of their *motivation* for their position on government-funded health care for undocumented migrants - you call me a liar and leave in a huff.
No, that's not a lie, that's a valid difference of opinion.
You on the other hand are the one who acted dishonestly by refusing to answer good-faith questions and refusing to acknowledge points of agreement.
You are the one who is demonstrating that you are just a troll and a stalker.
Of course Pedo Jeffy deflected any criticism of democrats to make this all about Trump and open borders.
He’s suck a fat, slimy, Marxist piece of shit.
Or locking the border down hard and severely punishing anybody trying to cross illegally.
If coyotes never enter the US, nothing we can do to them. If they have no stream of people to pay to get here, the business will dry up.
Or locking the border down hard and severely punishing anybody trying to cross illegally.
What this means in practice, is the deprivation of liberty against CITIZENS by the state trying to enforce the immigration regime that you desire, and the use of lethal state violence against unarmed migrants at the border.
The first is fundamentally immoral from a libertarian perspective.
The second is profoundly unpopular and will never survive in the court of public opinion. Once again, I point to the public freak-out that occurred with Trump's "child separation" policy. What do you think the freak-out would look like if the National Guard/Border Patrol/US Army are authorized to use lethal force against unarmed women and children at the border?
So if you want to convince *libertarians* that your ideas are good, then you will have to show why we should have to put up with the loss of liberty that you will demand of us, and you will have to demonstrate how you plan on providing public support for armed soldiers shooting unarmed penniless Guatemalans.
Fuck you and your open borders bullshit. Funny you bring up OBAMA’S child separation policy, then lie about it. You really deserve to be tortured to death by illegal alien gangbangers, you fat fuck.
No, that's not a great way, because we would have to let hundreds of millions people into the US. At reasonable immigration levels, immigration will not cause a reduction in demand.
But you're all for importing child rapists if they do the abusing while being processed for "asylum" aren't you. Why should anyone listen to a monster like you?
I'm not in favor of child abuse or child rape.
Are you in favor of child abuse or child rape?
If a child has been abused, do you think that at least passes some minimal test for starting the asylum process?
If a foreign child is being abused, that's a matter for the government of their country to deal with.
No, it doesn’t. The requirements for asylum are very clear. And that isn’t one of them.
You would know that if you weren’t such an ignorant, lying piece of shit.
You're right, Sandra. I need to get my mind right.
Sandra, stop Koch-blocking me!
I’m sure their parents will make good citizens.
Sounds like the law gives the parents an incentive to abuse their kids, so the kids can get green cards.
**mushroom cloud explodes from head**
Time for each Reason editor to start adopting then.
Wouldn’t they have to pass a background check?
The kids? Probably not.
I meant the “adults “.
Oh, well, no wonder they aren’t adopting.
ENB should be able to get an exception, and take in many of them. Given her sandwich making skills.
They just need to claim to be trans - that's a free pass to do whatever.
"Time for each Reason editor to start adopting then."
Do you think that illegal sub-humans, trannies, accused “groomers”, abortionists, gays, heathens, infidels, vaxxers, mask-wearers, atheists, dirty hippies, Jews, witches, or, the very WORST of them all, being one of those accused of STEALING THE ERECTIONS OF OUR DEAR LEADER, right, right-wing wrong-nuts... Should be allowed to EXIST? Have YOU adopted ANY of them? No? So then it's OK for us to collectively KILL them all, right? Whatever "the voters" say is Deeply Blessed, right?
Nobody reads your crap.
Yep. No one.
I'm guessing that by this point, most people don't even see it.
I, too, am a Supreme Uber-Genius who can refute ANYTHING by NOT reading it!!!
See what?
Apparently Shillsy is shitposting again, but everyone is just seeing a gray box.
We simply see a grey box. But the poor people that deal with it in real life can smell its shit breath from across the room.
Hope the orderlies at the institute where he lives get hazard pay.
They need to increase his Thorazine dosage.
They are clumps of cells that can work in factories.
So the legislature and the bureaucrats fucked up a government program with a really cool name. I for one am shocked. Also wondering why the backlog has doubled in 2 years. Looks like Trump was doing a better job.
If they were human beings then they would have papers.
If you were human you might occasionally have an original thought.
But you’re just a midwit.
He has plenty of leftist narratives. Ahh. Original thought. Disregard.
You can always tell what was on CNN today when Sarc is posting.
That’s awfully generous of you VM.
Yes, this! Government Almighty has Spoken! If Government Almighty (In It’s Profound Grace And Unfathomable Benevolence… and Deep Spiritual LOVE, even…) Had seen fit to grant the illegal sub-humans their “Magic Papers”, then the illegal sub-humans WOULD yea verily have been granted Sacred Spermissions, Sperm-Emissions from Queen Spermy Daniels, even, to Have Jerbs! Having obliviously FALLEN from the Graces of Government Almighty, they deserve neither jerbs nor “Magic Papers”!!! And for SURE, NOT the status of "human being worthy of respect"!!!
(Actually, jerbs follow “Magic Papers”, and SNOT vice versa, Truth be Told!!!)
How many live in your home now that you have a fabulous income?
How many large wild animals live in your home now, fascist, authoritarian asshole? Shall we then therefor exterminate all wildlife on the planet, to serve YOUR EVIL POWER-LUST AND UNQUENCHABLE PIGGY-THIRST, ye evil servant and serpent of the Evil One?
I did NotSee what you wrote.
I ignore it. I’m shocked no one has taken it to the vet to be put down.
He isnt allowed after CPS was called on him.
They don't need papers to be human, they need papers to get free stuff from the government.
Although I guess they are getting that anyway
Strawman and broken appeal to emotion noted.
Sarc coming out against the concept of property. Good to see.
Sarc: "Why are you in my house?"
Stranger: "What, I'm not a HUMAN if I do not have the deed?"
Sarc: "You got me."
Sarc becomes quite agitated if anyone enters his refrigerator box in that piss soaked alley where he lives.
It's not the USA'S job to save the entire world especially when they can't even save their own nation from the [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s].
It is however their job to protect it from an invasion of [Na]tional So[zi]alist minds.
Obviously, abused kids are Nazis.
More so than not (70%+) statistically and for the specific one's that aren't ... there is where the immigration policy needs to be addressed/corrected as Trump so perfectly stated it.
I see. How do you determine if an abused child is a Nazi or not?
If they think 'guns' (gov) makes stuff for them. (political criminals)
Also statistically far more-so than not.
I see. So trying to detect Nazi sympathies in an abused child is more important than the abuse that the child may be suffering.
The are turned into Nazis by Marxist groomers like you. After you get done molesting them.
Absolutely... Do you think the German Nazi's didn't abuse children or what? Just because someone has been abused means they can't ever abuse another? The abuse mentality is exactly what needs to be stopped. It does no good to entitle every victim without having any means of stopping the abuser.
Your self-entitlement pursuit is damaging your common-sense.
Obviously we need to clear the backlog by deporting them much more vigorously.
Yes, the exact same way that we've been able to solve alcohol and drug addiction, and poverty and crime, by deporting or PUNISHING-PUNISHING-PUNISHING all of the BAD people! ALL bad things can be FIXED with MORE punish-shit-ment!!! We ALL know that!!! Now we need a MUCH Stronger Strong-Man, and ALL Perfection is at Hand!!!! Twat could POSSIBLY go wrong, anyway?!?!?
Removing someone from a place they have no right to be in is not a punishment you self-entitled moron.
Jeff screams the same thing when he tried to enter children's dressing rooms.
Ad hominem attack noted.
Not ad hominem. A simple insult.
I am amazed those two idiots still don't understand this.
Neither one of them can figure that out, and it’s been YEARS.
Oh, huh. You understand that even if true, it makes Jesse look even worse?
Jesse: "I didn't even bother to consider an argument, I just went straight to the name calling, because I have the mentality of a 12-year-old."
No, we just don’t respect you, or consider you worthy of civility. Because you’re such an ignorant, lying, global Marxist piece of shit. Who has never once argued in good faith.
And then the children scream when Jeffy enters them.
It might be easier to help these children if we hadn't had over 6 million illegal aliens enter the USA over the last three years and sucking up huge amounts of resources. Seriously the resources of the USA are limited and choices must be made. Want to help these children? Stop expending resources on lawbreakers who enter the USA illegally.
No matter what kind of immigration system you would prefer, the first step is border security. It doesn't matter what our system and rules are if invaders can literally walk around them.
If only the number was that low. It's far closer to ten million in the last three years.
It would because mercy. America is such a racist, sexist, homophobic country (according to leftists) that we'd be doing them a kindness to pass them on to the safe state of Canada.
So, we are told that the government must
banremove certain books from school libraries, and impose authoritarian measures on private business owners who host drag shows, in order to protect the innocence of children. We're told that normally the government shouldn't be taking such steps, but, if it's for the sake of the children, well, exceptions must be made.But here we have actual abused children seeking asylum, and the reaction is, well, much different. I wonder why.
Because they are clumps of cells?
“and impose authoritarian measures on private business owners who host drag shows,”
Not engaging in sexual acts in front of children is authoritarian.
Would you consider it an authoritarian use of government power if the government were to force a private business to cancel an event in which there was no anticipated violation of the NAP?
Normal people would consider it an act of aggression to expose children to graphic sexual performances. Since you desire to sexualize children, you're unable to see that.
For some, it does seem to be the case.
So you’re for children being taken to strip clubs, porn stores, etc.?
So, in order to get this Protect Vulnerable Immigrant Youth Act through Congress, Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D–Calif.), Jimmy Gomez (D–Calif.), and Adriano Espaillat (D–N.Y.) of course inclThis June, Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D–Calif.), Jimmy Gomez (D–Calif.), and Adriano Espaillat (D–N.Y.) of course included provisions that would strongly appeal to Republican members of Congress, right?
Or are they just grandstanding on the backs of abused kids?
Well of course they are grandstanding. That is what politicians do. It is the same when Republican politicians demand "we will tolerate nothing less than deporting them all without exception or delay". That doesn't exactly appeal to the other side either. It would be nice if reasonable people could find a compromise somewhere that would permit genuinely abused children to not have to suffer.
The "other side" is free to try and pass legislation.
The Right is seeking to enforce laws that have been already been passed.
Laws don’t mean anything to global neo Marxists like Jeffy. He’s just doing it for the kids. And a big government check as his reward for grooming them.
Sounds rough. Maybe they would be more comfortable waiting in, you know, Mexico. Where its safe and they can speak the language?
Give them rifles and ammo and tell them to go fix their own countries.
You're right, Fiona, let's send them back from whence they came...they'll be much better off than they are here in "green card limbo!"
Waaah!
Deport.
OK, so if a judge determines a likelihood of abuse and it's not in their interest to be deported - wouldn't a simpler solution be to ship them off to be cared for by/in their COO's closest embassy or consulate? There's only a handful of nations that don't have one here (and if memory serves, it's mainly Iran, its proxy nations, and the Norks - and nobody from any of those should be coming across our border period) most actually have multiple - and we could easily condition our continued tolerance of their diplomatic relations on continued assurance that the kids are being well cared for by their COO's diplomats.
I mean, there's no reason to say, "Aww, you had it hard and decided to break into our country illegally. Here's American citizenship." That's stupid.
if you are here illegally you have to go. Period...
America is not the dumping ground for single moms with five kids who can't speak english and have no skills.
No. We produce plenty of those domestically.
And call it "empowering."