Javier Milei Sworn in as President of Argentina
"Just as the fall of the Berlin Wall marked the end of a tragic era for the world," he said, "these elections have marked the turning point in our history."

Javier Milei was sworn in as president of Argentina on Sunday. Breaking with tradition, the economist—and self-described anarcho-capitalist—delivered his inaugural address to thousands of his followers gathered outside, his back conspicuously turned away from the legislature.
"Today begins a new era in Argentina," he said, promising a new era of liberty and progress. "Today we end a long and sad history of decadence and decline and begin the road to the reconstruction of our country."
Milei, 53, is relatively new to politics, beginning his political career in 2019 and winning his first election in 2021. His political campaign took the world by surprise, calling for the deregulation of markets, the elimination of government ministries, and the dollarization of the economy. This platform helped him decisively win the second round of the presidential election on November 19, defeating the ruling Peronist coalition's candidate.
"For more than 100 years, politicians have insisted on defending a model that only generates poverty, stagnation, and misery," Milei said in his speech, promising to break ties with Argentina's political class, whom he called a "corrupt caste" throughout his campaign.
In Argentina, four out of 10 citizens live in poverty. Inflation has reached 143 percent and is expected to exceed 200 percent this year—one of the highest rates in the world. The country owes the International Monetary Fund $45 billion. Milei blames Argentina's "state of emergency" on the policies adopted under Peronist rule.
"The outgoing government has left us with hyperinflation, and it is our top priority to make every effort to avoid a catastrophe that would push poverty above 90 percent and indigence above 50 percent," he continued.
There is no room left for a gradualist approach to work, Milei suggested. Argentina does not "have margin for sterile discussions. Our country demands action and immediate action."
Milei acknowledged that this would have negative short-term effects. "There will be stagflation, it is true," he said, "but it is not very different from what has happened in the last 12 years." And after the short term is over, he promised, "we will see the fruits of our effort, having created the base for solid and sustainable growth."
One of his first actions, Milei declared, would be a 5 percent cut in public spending. He did not share any other details in his speech, but he is expected soon to submit a wide-ranging package of reforms to the legislature. His proposals will face an uphill battle, as his party, La Libertad Avanza, has only a small number of seats.
Milei's 35-minute speech ended with a call for liberty and a return to embrace the ideas of freedom: "Just as the fall of the Berlin Wall marked the end of a tragic era for the world, these elections have marked the turning point in our history." Years of failure cannot be undone at once. But change, Milei said, "begins in a day, and today is that day."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics.”
― Thomas Sowell
Looks like Milei flunked politics.
That's OK , he's being tutored by the Presidents of Liberkrania and the Free Republic of the Huns
This is a good speech. A five percent cut in government spending starting on day one is unassailable! He certainly, as President, has the authority all by himself to cut spending with or without the approve of the legislature.
What if an American president issued an executive order telling all executive agencies to spend 95% of what is budgeted? Would that have the effect of cutting spending by 5%?
That would get him hauled before the courts/congress. See Trump/Ukraine payment - iifc Impoundment Control Act from 1970s covers that.
A USA president's card to play would be to veto a budget and fight for cuts; if they have enough support to hold out.
Bummer.
A budget? What’s that? I know they used to have them, but we’re in the age of continuing resolutions now.
Good point. A problem with the Constitution is that it doesn't have any teeth. There's no prescribed punishment for Congress failing in their duty to produce a budget. I'd settle for charging them all with treason and hanging them from lamp posts outside their respective state capitols, but that's just me.
The US Constitution doesn't mention budgeting.
Good luck getting congress arresting themselves for treason. What else you got?
Today's continuing resolution is "Eyes Closed! Straight Ahead! Peeking will be Punished!"
As we head towards a financial cliff the two major political tribes argue over how hard to hit the gas, while neither considers using the brakes.
Oh, oh, can i steal that totally original comment?
Yeah! Get those Chinese!
Please continue showing your complete and intentional ignorance of governance as you criticize Trump for being a dictator while criticizing him for not being a dictator.
Under Obama around 2010 OMB issued changes to appropriations bills changing wording from may to shall requiring departments to spend all the money allocated. Prior to that, as noted above, was the Impoundment Act to make it presidents couldn’t act unilaterally.
It helps to understand the basics of the system before making an argument from ignorance.
Where he was legally allowed to he cut such as with regulations.
Even more ironically Trump tried to do that.
At an Oct. 17 Cabinet meeting, President Trump directed department and agency heads to reduce spending by at least 5 percent in the fiscal year 2020 budget. “Get rid of the fat; get rid of the waste,” he instructed them.
https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/how-trump-can-cut-spending-if-congress-doesnt
Then the Resistance came forward and congress got involved.
I wasn’t making an argument you antagonistic prick. I was asking a question because I didn’t know the answer. I would say thank you for giving me information that answers the question, but since you behave like an antagonistic thirteen year old boy I won’t.
The fact you wade into so many arguments you dont know the basis of discussion about is one of your primary issues here. And it doesn’t matter how many times things like the Impoundment Act are discussed here it never seems to stick. People get tired of telling you basic information you have firm beliefs in without informing yourself.
I asked questions, asshole. I wasn't making an argument. Once upon a time people in the comments would share knowledge without being total pricks about it. You sure despise those days.
You ignore answers retard. The same issue Mike and Jeff have. Doesn't matter how many times you're told something, you come back the next day just as ignorant.
“Get rid of the fat; get rid of the waste,”
That's silly. Fat and waste are the goals of budgeting, legitimate spending is the means.
Well, 5% of 6 trillion would be 300 billion dollars the taxpayers don't have to pay back later, for one.
The next result would be national panic headlines about children starving, the environment decaying, and infrastructure crumbling, and how now is not the time to try austerity, and how there is no way anyone can run an advanced industrial economy when the government only spends 45% more than it spent 5 years ago, instead of 50% more.
5% would mean staying the same, because all it would do is negate the new baseline.
Things are about to get Messi for the statists.
Just did, supposedly half the cabinet positions down the toilet.
Puerto Rico had a governor with programs similar to those of Milei. Luis Fortuno was by far, the best governor of any US entity (states plus possessions). He was on the way to a balanced budget, lower taxes and less regulation. Within a year, he was universally despised even though people were noticeably better off. When faced with re-election, the Puerto Rican people ousted him and voted for a socialist.
Argentinian media will attack Milei with incredible ferocity declaring his policies to have failed long before any are implemented.
Milei will probably be exiled or assassinated before any of his plans take effect.
On the other hand, he may defy the odds and start what will begin a global revolution. He has the support of Fortuno.
"he may defy the odds and start what will begin a global revolution." We can hope. Lord knows, the U.S is no longer the beacon for freedom in this world.
the U.S is no longer the beacon for freedom in this world.
Compared to what? Relative to the past yes we have lost freedoms, but relative to the rest of the world I think we're doing ok. While our government does its best to wipe its ass with the Constitution and Bill of Rights, people in other countries don't have either. They can go to jail for offending someone. Police start interrogations with a beating. Guns are things they see on tv.
It could be a lot worse.
According to the Heritage Foundation, the US isn't even in the top 20 for economic freedom. For 2023, the US ranks 25th with all of Europe, except France, having freer economies.
For overall freedom, the Cato Institute's rankings for 2020 have the US in 17th place. In 2017 to 2018 the US ranked 9th. Thank the one-two punch of Trump-Biden for the collapse.
Sorry, but unless we get rid of both Trump and Biden and then replace the Congress with actual free market people, we are on our way to 50th place or even worse.
But Americans seem to believe that foreign trade is destructive, that businesses can't be trusted to produce value, that more deficit spending spurs economic growth.
Since George W Bush, every administration has made the economy less free, mostly by dramatically increasing debt. Bush doubled the national debt, Obama redoubled the debt and the Trump-Biden combination will redouble it again.
That is totally subjective.
So the best way to get socialists elected eventually is to run libertarians.
Inflation has reached 143 percent and is expected to exceed 200 percent this year—
Sleepy Joe's fault - according to the Trump Cult.
All Statists are cut from the same cloth. So if the shoe fits, and it does, wear it.
“Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.” ― Robert A. Heinlein
The different flavors of statists differ in what they want to control and who they want to control it. One thing they can agree on is hatred of libertarians for not wanting people to be controlled.
It’s people like you that make people hate libertarians.
What did they do to you as a child to make you into... you?
The rule you established in 2020 was that POTUS is responsible for everything bad about the American economy. Didn't matter that there was a pandemic that made other countries struggle too.
Can't change the rules just because your boy Dementia Joe is in charge now.
#Bidenomics
Is this FAR RIGHT dude as scary as the FAR RIGHT woman who seized power in Italy establishing that country's most FAR RIGHT government since WW2?
Or can he instantly gain international respectability by saying the correct things about Ukraine?
It's funny how so many supposed libertarians single out Ukraine for their scorn (as if resisting invasion and genocide is a bad thing and somehow the non-aggression principle doesn't apply to Russia), when it's basically all the authoritarian governments in the world supporting Russia and Hamas.
Including MAGA Republicans, who see Russia and Hungary as some sort of bastion against wokeness and gays and for white people and Christians.
As an actual libertarian, Millel is indeed pro Ukraine and Israel
The Russian response is a logical, if aggressive one. Based partly on the US and NATO fucking around in their literal front yard in fairly unlibertarian ways.
The hundreds of billions sent to them isn’t terribly libertarian.
The full on propaganda blitz in western media when we aren’t even directly involved wasn’t too libertarian.
Hungary is a bastion, not only against wokeness but europes attempted suicide.
If the UN is so corrupt and communist that they make Russia look good, thats on them. A lot of libertarians think Agenda 2030 is a way more direct threat to freedom world wide than Putin.
Its perfectly libertarian to support Ukraine against Russian aggression.
However it is definitely not libertarian to support the continued spending of billions of dollars we don't actually have to defend Ukraine. Particularly at a time when our Government has completely failed to even produce a budget. Pretending America has unlimited resources or that our Congress will ever manage to cut enough domestic spending and entitlements to cover our spending abroad is not being libertarian.
Milei acknowledged that this would have negative short-term effects. "There will be stagflation, it is true," he said, "but it is not very different from what has happened in the last 12 years." And after the short term is over, he promised, "we will see the fruits of our effort, having created the base for solid and sustainable growth."
Well it's certainly a good thing that he didn't promise rock candy and unicorns on day one. Only on day two with all the epistemological certainty of Austrian economics.
What he didn't mention surprises me. The dog that's not barking. His party is itself a coalition of parties - his paleolib party (entirely Buenos Aires based), a militarist/far-right party, and a bunch of regional/federalist/populist parties. My guess is it's the latter that won Milei the election since his coalition won every province outside Buenos Aires. Populist anger at Buenos Aires screwing everything up not libertarian ideology.
His party can't do anything in the legislature and nor can a coalition of parties. The Peronists and Socialists combined are a majority.
Shutting ministries down is a great start. Failing to allow for devolution of powers however means all those changes will be easily reversed if/when the future day two isn't as predictably rosy as he paints.
He's in the same centralized power trap that Argentina has always been in. But centralized libertarian/Austrian this time - (with the kinda ugly specter of far-right militarist if things fail).
I just want to know whether he's going to give any helicopter tours to some of the outgoing bureaucracy.
As long as the helicopters are privately funded, the bureaucrats sign a contract saying they agree to be thrown out at 1000 feet, and no one gets hurt on the ground from falling commies, it seems a perfectly libertarian solution.
Sad thing is, he’s probably going to wish he had done it within a year or so.
Shaving off merely 5% seems timid in comparison to the rest of what he's saying.