COP28: No 'Phase Out' of Fossil Fuels After All
Countries could include reducing the consumption and production of fossil fuels.

Dubai, United Arab EmiratesโEarlier today at COP28, the United Nations' climate summit, U.N. Secretary-General Antonion Guterres declared that "a central aspect, in my opinion, of the success of the COP will be for the COP to reach a consensus on the need to phase out fossil fuels in line with a time framework that is in line with the 1.5 degree limits." In other words, Guterres wants COP28 to impose a global deadline for the elimination of fossil fuels from the world's energy supplies.
The new proposed text for the Global Stocktake (GST)โthe principal document being composed at the conferenceโmay disappoint Guterres. Though the options in the negotiating text all proposed some goal for the "phase out" of fossil fuels as of last Friday, that term is nowhere in the new GST text.
While expressing a desire for deep, rapid, and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, the GST draft text as it stands now "calls upon Parties to take actions that could include," among other things, "Reducing both consumption and production of fossil fuels, in a just, orderly and equitable manner so as to achieve net zero by, before, or around 2050 in keeping with the science."
This clearly avoids the trigger words "phase out," but doesn't it really amount to the same thing? Perhaps not. Because that formulation "could include" suggests that reducing the consumption and production of fossil fuels is just one option among many that signatories may choose to pursue over the next two years.
It is worth noting that this draft text does include the phrase "fossil fuels." If that remains in the final text, this will be the first time an official COP decision document actually deployed those words. Previously, such documents have coyly focused on cutting greenhouse gas emissions without mentioning from whence those pesky emissions might come.
This outcome is entirely unsatisfactory to the longtime climate activist (and former U.S. vice president) Al Gore. "COP28 is now on the verge of complete failure," he posted on X (formerly Twitter). "The world desperately needs to phase out fossil fuels as quickly as possible, but this obsequious draft reads as if OPEC dictated it word for word. It is even worse than many had feared."
Gore is not alone in his disappointment. Spain's environment minister, a co-leader of the European Union's delegation, said "there are elements in the text that are fully unacceptable."
Other options in the draft GST text include such measures as "Tripling renewable energy capacity globally and doubling the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030." This is in line with the global pledge signed by nearly 120 countries issued on December 2. Note that China, India, Saudi Arabia, and Russia did not commit to this goal.
Interestingly, the draft text mentions nuclear energy as one of the measures that countries could include in their efforts. So perhaps COP28 is the "nuclear COP" after all.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Well, I for one, am shocked by this development. Shocked!
Would you count that as a full description of the emotional state you achieved from reading this article? Is it more or less of the state you were seeking when you decided to read it? Finally, where is the section for articles and comments when seeking to instead curb the distractions of emotionally intensity? In other words, where are to be found articles and/or comments that are actually disciplined by REASON?
If COP28 phased out fossil fuels, how would all the beautiful people in attendance be able to make it to COP29?
Hang gliders.
Propelled by farts from their vegan diets
"how would all the beautiful people in attendance be able to make it to COP29?"
We'll give them a pair of Nikes and a cup of Kool-Aid.
Why, they'd use EVs powered by potato batteries provided by Professor Bobo from Pearl Forrester's potato battery monopoly!
๐
๐
Folks, Mystery Science Theater 3000 not only riffed and spoofed horrible movies, but in the first 5:35 of this episode, they inadvertently riffed and spoofed "Green Energy," with a sidebar dig at Transgender thuggery activism.
๐
๐
MST3K - Boggy Creek II (S10 E06) [HD] 1080p60 - Project MSTie
https://youtu.be/CtIJmzMXVDw?si=mtoMPb2NJjjiWp4s
It just breaks my f**cking heart that AlGore is disappointed. I will celebrate the collapse of the War on Global Warming if and when it finally happens, but it should surprise no one that a huge international climate Congress canโt actually agree on anything after our experience with our own Congress of the United States. I have no doubt that renewable energy will eventually gain a share of the market as the technology improves, and I have no doubt whatsoever that the economic crisis that would occur as a result of draconian mandatory cuts in fossil fuel energy use would be far worse than any minor, gradual social dislocations if the world simply lets the current interglacial warming trend take its course.
But, every other globalist bureaucratic body of public sector teet-suckers has been so profficient and effective at accomplishing their objectives!
Yeah, who could have ever guessed?
The climate cult wants nothing less than a global economic catastrophe, and the end of capitalism. Of course, they all all be safe and sound with cushy government and academic jobs, or their trust funds.
More testing needed!
Yep. China and India will be carbon free by 2050. And the flying pigs will use solar power.
In other news, the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928 renounced war as an instrument of national policy and to settle all international disputes by peaceful means. Non compliance still being addressed.
It looks like we dodged a bullet; COP28 may end up doing no damage at all.
So the author's previous article, "Fossil Fuel Phase-Out Frenzy at COP28" was hysteria? But he's fine now? Good.
Is there a way to tell when articles of REASON are meant to serve as catalysts for the reader's emotional state? I can already spot the Koch propaganda. (Hint: follow the oil) But I can't seem to shake the naรฏve habit of assuming that anyone with the confidence to claim the mantel of our crucial human faculty must have relevant contributions, and I am, of course, frustrated. I don't lead my life by emotions however, and so I continue my search.
Perhaps the editors could invent a special section for those readers who simply seek reason without regard to the emotional satisfaction? Because if there's EVER anything worth reading on this site, I'd be curious about it.