Give to Reason and Help Create the Next Generation of Libertarians!
Or: WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!

In its early years, the long-running animated sitcom The Simpsons was famous for laughable characters who would shout, "WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!" at the drop of a hat, a smart parody of increasingly ubiquitous attempts to push political and cultural agendas by invoking society's most vulnerable members. Only a few weeks ago, I wrote a Reason column about the show's slow, sad embrace of just such an attitude regarding pater familias Homer's cartoon violence toward his son Bart and other offenses to "enlightened" sensibilities.
But now, as we enter the weekend period of Reason's webathon—the one time a year we ask our readers, viewers, and listeners to make tax-deductible donations to fund our principled libertarian journalism—I unironically ask you TO THINK OF THE CHILDREN! (And while you're doing that, go here to check out different giving levels and associated swag; and yes, we accept bitcoin, fiat currency, and almost anything short of live or dead animals.)
Give me a minute to explain.
Established in 1968 as a mimeographed magazine by Boston University student Lanny Friedlander (who died in 2011), Reason has over the ensuing decades become a full-fledged media juggernaut. Our monthly mag goes out to 52,000 subscribers, our podcasts are downloaded 530,000 times a month, our website pulls 3 million visits a month, and our videos generate on average 5.1 million views a month. We've got 43,500 Instagram followers; 282,000 Twitter (alright, X) followers; 363,000 daily email newsletter readers; 618,000 Facebook followers; and 868,000 YouTube subscribers. (All figures are from our Fiscal Year 2023, which ended in September.)
As our reach and visibility have grown, so has our readership among and influence on younger people, who are constantly being told in explicit and implicit ways that they are entering a world that is completely devoid of common decency and moral virtue, uniquely destructive to psychological and emotional health, and fundamentally unsustainable from environmental and economic perspectives. There are right- and left-wing variants to these metanarratives of doom and gloom, but they are absolutely everywhere you look: Don't have kids because of the environment (or because they're too expensive)! Gender fluidity must be eradicated from public life entirely and, besides, Atrazine is turning frogs and boys gay! There are too many flavors of deodorant to choose from, which is both psychologically demotivating and economically wasteful. School shooters, child molesters, stochastic terrorism, and unnaturally thin social media influencers have taken complete control of American life!
As psychologist and Generation Disaster: Coming of Age Post-9/11 author Karla Vermeulen told me in the video below, Millennials and Gen Zers have been bombarded since birth with messages that their world is utterly and totally doomed.
No wonder that across the board, Millennials and Gen Zers tend to report significantly higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression than Gen Xers and Boomers do. They've simply been attentive to what American Enterprise Institute sociologist Scott Winship calls "declension narratives," or stories about how the past was better and the present and future really just kind of totally suck. Watch this short video for a discussion of "3 Myths About American Decline" and why they are misguided when not just totally false.
Reason stands athwart such toxic pessimism "yelling Stop," as National Review long ago promised to do vis-à-vis history. But unlike conservatives, we aren't constantly trying to breathe life into dead-but-with-us-still institutions, attitudes, and mindsets. We celebrate economic, cultural, and political creative destruction that allows societies to grow, innovate, and flourish while also maintaining continuity with the past. And we consistently take this piss out of the apocalypse du jour by showing younger people (and older ones, too!) that "Free Minds and Free Markets" are already making the world a better place—and could do even more if we were all given a little more freedom.
Younger people don't need to be hectored about what might have worked in some supposed Golden Age past. They need to be given realistic analyses of today's world and what sorts of policies might work in the future. We've been delivering the goods on that front, especially with short videos that whet the appetite for deeper dives on all sorts of policy areas. Consider this YouTube short featuring Andrew Heaton that talks about how housing policy has made it virtually impossible to build new apartment buildings in many major urban areas. The video has pulled 2 million views, and 57 percent of those watching are under 35 years old.
Or consider this TikTok featuring Reason's Billy Binion, which was similarly popular among younger people. In less than a minute, he deftly explains the looming threat of eminent domain abuse. Interested readers can comb through hundreds of articles about eminent domain by Christian Britschgi, C.J. Ciaramella, Joe Lancaster, and others.
@reasonmagazine Eminent domain allows the state to take someone's property as long as they provide just compensation. Sometimes it's for important utility projects, but often it's for political pet projects like tourist attractions or an electric vehicle factory. #blacktiktok #property
And if Millennials and Zoomers have been subjected to a steady stream of socialist propaganda in their K-12 and college years, Reason is robustly advancing the argument that it's capitalism that has produced a historic reduction in global poverty. Cue Robby Soave:
View this post on Instagram
Which is a roundabout way of answering the question in the subtitle of this post. Who's thinking about the children, especially as they grow up and move out into the world? Reason is, and we're offering persuasive counternarratives to the negative and false messages about the future being sent from the right and left.
When I started at Reason back in 1993, I'd say that the biggest sources of new libertarians were the works of Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman, and maybe Robert Heinlein—writers and public figures who in very different but effective ways made the case for individualism, minimal government, and increasing freedom in all areas of human activity. Toward the end of the aughts, Ron Paul became a major factor, especially among younger people. So was the state of the world itself and the politicians who ran it. Endless elective wars, a financial crisis that was clearly the result of massive and disparate government interventions into all sorts of economic activity, and bald-faced lying about surveillance on the part of successive presidents and presidential candidates also played a huge role, too.
But so has Reason in all its permutations. I've talked about how Reason played the chief role in my own political awakening, and television legends such as Drew Carey and John Stossel have given credit where credit is due. In 2007, Carey told Time, "I never thought I was a libertarian until I picked up Reason magazine and realized I agree with everything they had printed." And in 2011, Stossel told viewers of his Fox Business show:
I looked in The New York Times and the lefty press that we were reading and it was all about got to have much more government doing everything. And I turned to the conservative press and the conservative press was all upset about sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll. And upset about homosexuality, and it just didn't make sense to me. I finally discovered Reason magazine….And that was an epiphany for me. It was like, wow, these people get it. Wow, they really get it, much better than I do.
Now more than ever, Reason is helping to create the next generation of libertarians by producing more and more content that finds Millennials and Gen Zers where they live and that speaks to the mix of idealism and exhaustion they evince. Without speaking down to them (or to anyone else, for that matter), we report on the real state of the world, what's working and what's not, and how to create a future in which more and more of us get to live how we want to live.
If you want to help create tomorrow's libertarians, support Reason today with a tax-deductible donation. Your gift is currently being matched, meaning it goes twice as far when it comes to writing more articles, recording more podcasts, and producing more videos. Give now!
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!
There are several commenters that do so early and often.
If Pluggo played guitar he'd be Jimmy Page
The girlies he likes are underage.
Didn't Page contebd he was against pedophilia and was just doing research so he could fight it?
Iirc, that was Pete Townsend.
Tommy, can you feel me?
Youre right. That was Townshend.
I think he got off. From the charges too.
Give to Reason and Help Create the Next Generation of Libertarians!
Or: WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!
NICK GILLESPIE | 12.2.2023 8:00 AM
You can tell from this that Gillespie doesn't read the comments.
🙂
😉
Mises.org already has free copies if rothbard and von mises. Bastiat is public domain. Donating here may create a libertine instead of a libertarian. So think I will keep my money. Until you let us donate to specific writers.
^ This.
We want an option to donate specifically to the good Liz.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome9.com
Of course you won't contribute to the only website that hasn't banned you for being a raging cunt.
Why should Reason ban Jesse?
It should be noted that the Soros cuckold that posted links to cp here has not been banned (just the specific account that did so).
I didn't say that they should. Just that his behavior would get him kicked off any website that demanded a minimum level of civility.
What is the specific behavior that you find fails to meet your minimum level of civility standard?
Some things are self evident and need no explanation.
You don’t like it when he posts the entirety of previous posts you have made?
He hates it. It exposes his lies too succinctly.
I don't like liars and their defenders. That includes taking things out of context, making stuff up, lying by omission, and anything else I may have missed. All the perennial favorites in these here comments that you among others consistently join into and defend.
That includes taking things out of context, making stuff up, lying by omission, and anything else I may have missed.
This is what he calls word for word posts along with links if he asks. Lol. Fucking hilarious.
Meanwhile below he straight up makes lies says evidence. Again. Fucking hilarious.
In all the years you've been posting here you've never made a truthful statement. That takes talent or mental illness. Still not sure which.
What the hell, ill bookmark that one too. I'll use it as an example of projection when you misuse the term again.
Provide evidence buddy. Take a few deep breaths first. Lol.
Any sentence written by you and directed at me with the word "you" in it. There are millions to choose from. Every single one is a lie.
Do you have an example? Sorry for using the word you. But you still aren't providing evidence.
Here is an example of why I bookmark.
Literally a day later you denying you said something while calling me a liar. When you did exactly what I said =) hope this helps.
https://reason.com/2023/11/06/blinkens-mission-impossible/?comments=true#comment-10306317
Do you think providing an entire post falls under “out of context”?
Cmom sarc. Defend your weak and bald assertion for once in your life. You can do it. I believe in you buddy.
What behavior sarc? Please provide examples.
I'll start.
sarcasmic 2 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
I was going to add something about people who might be splattered by the mess, but nobody cares about your alone ass. Shit. Nobody will know you’re missed until they shut the power off and things start to smell.
sarcasmic 2 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
I see he’s dropped some turds on my comments. No doubt more lies about stuff I never said nor did, and probably something nasty about my family.
.
I wish he’s talk his shit to someone’s face. He wouldn’t be commenting for a while because he’d be in the hospital.
Your turn.
g
e
t
a
l
i
f
e
That wasn't a post from me. Try again buddy. Show us this behavior.
Here's some classics:
sarcasmic 2 hours ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Mother’s Lament is the worst human being I’ve ever been unfortunate enough to communicate with in my entire life. I wouldn’t piss on his face if his teeth were on fire. So I really don’t care what he supports.
sarcasmic 22 mins ago
Flag Comment Mute User
I didn’t say you have moose. I said you fuck moose. You. Personally.
sarcasmic 3 hours ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Because annoying you is fun.
sarcasmic 2 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
I think him and Nardz are going to go on a shooting spree someday. I really do. Storm a Democrat convention with body armor and rifles. Actually no. That would require balls. They’ll probably do something more like the DC sniper. Hide in the trunk of a car when they’re not making sweet homosexual love.
sarcasmic
November.2.2021 at 10:19 am
Chumby does. Pretty sure he's a Mainer. But he's got me on mute. You know, virtue signaling to Ken. Can't listen to someone who takes people's words to their logical conclusion. Only a progressive would do that, right?
sarcasmic
September.10.2021 at 12:14 pm
I stir shit up. So what.
sarcasmic 6 hours ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Yeah, I don’t like being impersonated. I know you don’t care because you have no honor or integrity, but I do.
Out of context posts!!!!
Hide in the trunk of a car when they’re not making sweet homosexual love.
He doesn’t even realize the bear danger from hiding in a trunk.
Guess those were his emotional feelingz when he posted.
Emotional truths*
*buttressed by bald assertions.
Sarc needs a safe bubble where his ignorance and lack of principles won't be exposed. Oddly he could achieve that by just leaving, but he also has a weird desire to be a victim, so he keeps coming back.
Poor sarc. So angry. It will be okay buddy. Deep breaths.
Actually not even shocked you want censorship. Lol.
Also bookmarked.
Also bookmarked.
L
O
S
E
R
Get a life.
Stop lying about what you say and I won’t need to bookmark. Stop being a hypocrite and I won’t need to bookmark.
Predicated on your behavior. Same with Jeff. Pathalogical liars require receipts. Understand? =)
L
O
S
E
R
Lol. Sorry lying hypocrite. You have demanded people provide evidence. Your demand. Now you're pissed people met your demands. Again. Stop being a lying hypocrite and it wouldn't matter if I bookmarked now would it. Lol.
I don't bookmark posts by liars on the internet.
I have broken down your posts lie by lie in the past, but it's not worth the effort to do it again.
No you haven't. Lol. Provide evidence. Your breakdowns are not reputations of your past statements. They are rationalizations orthogonal to what you said in an attempt to deny the word by word citation provided.
So think I will keep my money. Until you let us donate to specific writers.
How 'bout giving some of that donated money to the commenters? We do a lot of free writing and research here.
A commenter roundup once a weekend would be pretty good.
I concur. While Ken and I disagreed on some things, most notably eastern Europe, he could have penned articles more than worthy of this periodical. Sandra as well.
I’d enjoy it if they had jeff write something on the age of consent. Not for the article but the comments.
Anustasia has actually been more explicit against age of consent laws.
Sandra??? Give me a break.
TDS asshole that one.
Better Bastiat than Basquiat.
Get out of DC.
Fire KMW.
Start thinking of liberty first, then pragmatism.
Agreed, MrMxyzptlk and company should leave DC first, right, Nick "Mxyzptilk" Gillespie?
MrMxyzptlk is Nick? But MrMxyzptlk was backhandedly praising South Dakota while simultaneously discouraging people to move. That doesn't would like The Jacket.
1. Get rid of Koch money. It's poisonous.
2. Get out of DC.
3. Fire the Foundation board.
4. Start thinking of liberty first, then pragmatism.
5. Fire KMW.
6. Hire a diversity of libertarian opinion. Bring in Paleolibertarians and actual left-libertarians like Michael Shellenberger. Stop hiring these big-government fetishists in ill-fitting libertarian skin suits, whose articles read like auditions for jobs at the NYT or Atlantic.
7. Stop being auxiliaries in the establishment Democrat war against Mises Caucus. The fact that Reason is the biggest enemy of the largest segment of the Libertarian Party is insane.
Are you some kind of anarchist?
Also no libritarian should use "equity" it is a loaded Marxist term
I mean, there is an older, non-hijacked definition of the term "equity." It's bastardized to mean "equality of outcomes regardless of opportunity," instead of our usual sense of equality, which is just equal opportunity.
You could use the term "equity" to describe almost any lawsuit seeking recompense for real damages-ie, the government demolished your house because they mistakenly believed a fugitive was hiding inside. An equitable outcome not only pays the cost of restoring your home, but also the costs of loss of comfort and the inconvenience of not being able to use your house for a lengthy period. (And when the government says, "Fuck you, we don't owe you anything," we call that a Tuesday.)
If you're using equity in a non-social-justice sense, it's a good word.
Don't look now, but "dollarized" Ecuador finally empowered an undead DEA sockpuppet. The first act of the New Caudillo de Dios was to repeal the law legalizing possession of small quantities of non-addictive drugs.
The excuse for gunning down dollarized Ecuadorian civilians over plant leaves? “In this way, we care for the future of Ecuadorian families and protect our children, girls and adolescents from the use of psychotropic substances and narcotic drugs.” This is exactly what The Looter Kleptocracy has endless-looped since self-hypnotists Biden, Reagan, Charles Rangel, Jim Wright, Strom Thurmond, Dan Quayle and Kerry chanted "Just Say No" over and over and over...
Ah, the audacity of those tricorn-hat-wearing radicals, trotting about with the arrogance of peacocks in the jardin! How they prattle endlessly, with the fervor of a thousand suns, about liberté, égalité, fraternité, while sipping their café au lait! Mon dieu, Robespierre, Danton, Marat, and their ilk, brandishing their pamphlets like sabers at a duel, professing to rescue the commoners from the so-called tyranny of silk and velvet! As if their raucous cries of "Vive la Révolution!" could drown the elegant whispers of courtly intrigue. Oh, how they dance the Carmagnole, round and round, as if possessed by the spirit of some mischievous faun, convinced they are the harbingers of a new era, while in truth, they are but jesters in a farce scripted by the ghosts of Versailles!
If reason represents libertarians best chance with da yoots, then they might as well convert to communism.
Reason does represent the best chance with the youths... What with the "promethean transformations", acknowledgement of climate change and the ability to fight it with cheap solar panels and mandated electric cars.
"...we ask our readers, viewers, and listeners to make tax-deductible donations to fund our principled libertarian journalism"
Puhleeze. Reason is less and less libertarian by the year, half the time not even bothering to advance even the most basic libertarian arguments in articles. Its obsession with the legacy parties' Presidential candidates and near-total lack of coverage of the Libertarian Party (except for a sporadic burst now and then) is glaringly obvious.
These days, Reason is about as libertarian as Hilary Clinton.
These days, Reason is about as libertarian as Hilary Clinton.
Even more so!
Funny comments from the non-Libertarians telling Reason they aren’t Libertarian enough for them! Funny, if Reason goes under how will you argue with all your Prog buddies?
According to the majority of the commentariat, if Reason was truly libertarian they'd be defending Trump 24/7/365.25
Cite?
Always funny watching fake libertarians claiming defending someone they hate against state abuses is wrong.
You and others shouting TDS at anyone who doesn't kiss the ring. yasafi
You have TDS. I dont even call you out for it. Haven’t in a long time. Because it is self evident to everyone here. You can provide a citation in the last year to prove me wrong.
You do have it though, see your false claim above and your link in the other thread lol.
This is especially hypocritical from you though who calls people defending against abuses of the state as cultists and Forever Trumpers.
Yeah, like that.
I provided the link just above last time you claimed this a lie. Lol.
How about shouting TDS at people gloating over unconstitutional political lawfare because they think the victim is a buffoon?
Is that valid?
Last week he tried to redefine TDS to mean exactly that. Being against political prosecutions and state abuses against someone you hate is apparently not libertarian per sarc.
I don't think that Trump was intentionally libertarian in any way. But a lot of his administration's policy choices could be described as 'accidentally' libertarian.
I'll take 'accidentally libertarian' over someone who says they're trying to be libertarian and is accidentally statist/authoritarian. And I'll take the person who is trying to be liberty minded over the actual totalitarian statists who are intentional about it.
I mean he campaigned on reduced regulations, tax cuts, and working on various prison reforms. First Step was over a years worth of work. He also campaigned against getting into no new wars and didn’t. Not sure how any of that was accidental.
The accidental ones were probably the Abraham Accords and being federalist during the first year of covid. Too bad he didn’t remain as a federalist at the end when agreeing to CARES, but Congress is primarily responsible for that with 90% votes in house and senate.
No president with such an actively entrenched bureaucracy against him can be perfect. The demand is silly. I'll always prefer taking a couple of steps towards liberty than no steps or steps away from it.
And if Trump is actually campaigning on build "future cities" and other things that sound like progressivist pipe dreams, I'm in favor of calling him out for those things. Instead the focus is still on the fact that he organized a protest at the capitol three years ago and that this exercise of constitutionally-protected speech is unforgivable.
Despite the fact they don't have a single word of him organizing shit until words to demonstrate peacefully then disburse after the fact.
That's the problem with outlier minorities. As a spoiler-vote-getting party with a cogent original platform, the LP undid a lot of the damage done by looter and mystical prohibition parties since Reconstruction. But when our 4 million presidential votes shuffled and redealt 127 electoral votes in 13 States, the Kleptocracy had to infiltrate and destroy or gradually quit robbing and murdering. Still, it took Sarwark's unguarded comment to show them how looter cash could pack the fake convention with infiltrating collectivists and turn the LP into a larger, softer, less angry version of the Army Of God.
if Reason was truly libertarian they’d be defending Trump 24/7/365.25
I don't know about defending him constantly, but I think it's very libertarian to defend him against the way the legal system is being weaponized against him. And their coverage and defense of these lawsuits is often either non-existent, minimal, or perfunctory. Unless I've missed it, they haven't talk about any of the lawsuits brought in several states trying to pre-emptively remove Trump from the ballot because he started an "insurrection," which is an absolutely bogus, untenable position.
No, their defense of the lawsuits against Trump are vociferous, assuming guilt and constant. Have you not followed Sullum's TDS BS as he declares Trump guilty beyond all doubt but gives all benefit to both Obama (through absence) and Biden explicitly despite lesser protections for worse actions.
Reason goes under how will you argue with all your Prog buddies?
We'll follow the Reason scribblers to their new employer at The New Republic.
If you really want to help create the next generation of libertarians, direct them to Dave Smith and Michael Malice.
Anarchist Army Of God girl-bulliers. That's the ticket!
Fascist freakshow of Moloch-fellating infanticide fetishists, that's the ticket.
Gender fluidity must be eradicated from public life entirely
Correct.
What do you have against continuously variable trans?
Reason stands athwart such toxic pessimism "yelling Stop," as National Review long ago promised to do vis-à-vis history.
So has Reason--not to mention Human progress.org and Steven Pinker-- found any reason for optimism in the wake of the biggest slaughter of Jews in a single day since The Holocaust? Where have their words of encouragement been here?
I'm not happy with how Reason has outsourced their subscription and tech support to some outside firm (or so I assume). In the past, I could email support and get a response right away. Now it takes days and my problem (cannot connect my digital subscription to my account) is still not fixed. I'm considering cancelling all together.
Certainly not interested in giving someone money if you can't get the basics right.
Presione 1 para inglés.
There's a lot to unpack here so I'll just make a couple of points about Reason and "The Children". Reason's primary benefactor has endorsed for president an unapologetic authoritarian establishment neocon for president. If she is successful it's difficult to imagine that young people will somehow find themselves in a more "libertarian" world. Reason defends, or at least will not condemn, the liberty of Munchausen moms to chemically and surgically mutilate their healthy children. Reason also defends the liberty of women to abort a healthy full term fetus in the birth canal. For these children libertarianism will be the least of their worries. Reason refuses even to acknowledge non violent protesters held without bail for years and sentenced to federal prison. Reason refuses to even acknowledge the well documented criminality of the sitting president. Reason refuses to condemn, in fact it celebrates, the weaponization of the DOJ and the federal judiciary to prosecute their political opponents using "novel" interpretations of law. The message to young people is that if they dare stray from the dictates of the establishment regime, Reason libertarians won't give a shit.
"Give to Reason and Help Create the Next Generation of Libertarians!"
Any evidence to support this claim?
ENB and Liz both have young children, right?
ENB at least we have to worry about because she's either going to trans one or pimp them out into sex work.
Nick claims a PhD in literature. Why not take a look at the first paragraphs of Henry Miller’s “Tropic Of Cancer”? Miller has a character belch warmunist Cassandra Sharknado pandering today’s looter media projectile-hoses at viewers 24/7–urging men with guns to outlaw electricity (just NOT in totalitarian dictatorships). Just Say No fearmongering was dinned into their developing minds from early childhood--cut with toxic doses of mystical terrorism. Small wonder they attack art, science, freedom and methods of inference.
I wonder if Hank actually still lives in 1974 and is posting this stuff via wormhole.
It would explain why he can't make a reference less than 50 years old.
You don’t like the cut of his jib?
Or his brain is so fried he really thinks its still 1977?
You beat me to it. I'd guess Alzheimer's.