Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Free Speech

Irish Prison for Edgelords and Hotheads?

Plus: Repealing tobacco bans, UN pointlessness, Substack's "Nazi problem," and more…

Liz Wolfe | 11.29.2023 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Parnell St | News Licensing / MEGA / Newscom/NEWSUK/Newscom
(News Licensing / MEGA / Newscom/NEWSUK/Newscom)

Ireland toys with criminalizing speech: Last week, in Dublin, three young schoolchildren were stabbed by an Algerian-born man. This set off waves of protests, rioting, and looting, mostly attributed to the anti-immigrant far-right by the press (the accuracy of which some Irish political observers dispute). 

Unfortunately, "the riots have caused the government to go into warp drive to pass their proposed hate-speech laws," writes National Review's Michael Brendan Dougherty. "Ireland already has laws on the books to stop criminal harassment and laws to stop the incitement of riots. But the proposed hate-speech laws go much, much further, to the point of criminalizing speech that a person has neither uttered nor published. A person could be arrested under these new laws for merely possessing speech, perhaps on his phone, that a judge deems offensive."

Prime Minister Leo Varadkar says the country is insufficiently equipped for the "social media era" and that such hate-speech laws are necessary to protect marginalized groups from violence. Violators could receive up to five years in prison, but Varadkar's administration has been disturbingly quiet on what type of hate speech would actually warrant prison time. Critics say that memers, shitposters, and people speaking humorously or ironically could surely be harmed by laws like these.

So far, authorities in Ireland have already "opened an investigation into MMA star and Irish citizen Conor McGregor over remarks he posted on social media in the aftermath of the riots," per The Messenger. Though no speech should be criminalized, it's worth noting that McGregor's comments were quite innocuous. He said that the child victims were "ruthlessly stabbed by a mentally deranged non-national" and clarified that he does not condone the riots.

"There will be change in Ireland, mark my words. The change needed. In the last month, innocent children stabbed leaving school. Ashling Murphy murdered. Two Sligo men decapitated. This is NOT Ireland's future! If they do not act soon with their plan of action to ensure Ireland's safety, I will," wrote the MMA fighter.

Somehow, this was enough for authorities to think McGregor's speech was worthy of investigation. If Varadkar's hate-speech law gets passed, expect much more of this.

In case that wasn't disturbing enough, the Irish government also "intends to pass additional legislation that would allow law enforcement to use facial recognition technology to identify individuals who participate in violent riots," reports The Messenger.

Though I am in favor of doling out punishment to those who commit property crimes, bolstering the capabilities of the surveillance state seems like a bad road to go down.

New Zealand remembers that, actually, smoking is cool: Last year, the government of New Zealand passed a law that banned people born after 2008 from buying cigarettes. The law was designed so that the smoking age would be raised gradually, year by year, until everyone in the population was ultimately prevented from buying tobacco products.

But last week, for reasons that are unclear, New Zealand's parliament started to reverse that law in a huge win for smoker freedom. Nicola Willis, the country's new finance minister, has publicly pointed to the fact that legislators have realized that this would lead to black-market sales of tobacco.

"We still want to see lower numbers of people smoking, but we do not think that the outgoing government's policy is the best way to achieve that," Willis told the broadcaster RNZ. Government officials, including Willis, have pointed to the fact that lost revenue from cigarette pack taxation was beginning to seed worry, so repealing the ban was a means of getting around that problem. (Taxes and duties on cigarette packs account for a staggering 70 percent of the total purchase price in New Zealand.)

Classic government logic: Since banning something creates black markets, they will instead…allow a vice, yet tax it quite heavily, which—checks notes—surely avoids that whole black market problem.

When will the bureaucrats learn?


Scenes from New York: 

How's the rollback of the war on drugs going? Mayor Eric Adams has apparently just started going after the landlords who rent to unlicensed pot shops. "Building owners whose tenants sell illegal tobacco or cannabis could face penalties of up to $1,000 a day once action is taken," reports The City. "Those civil penalties could increase to $5,000—and the cost of the city's attorney and other fees—if a building owner doesn't evict an illegal shop."


QUICK HITS

  • Shamelessly asking for your support, as it is WEBATHON TIME! Having lots of small donors allows us to maintain a wonderfully high degree of editorial independence. If you have, in any small way, gotten something from reading Roundup (or even the cursed comment section), please consider giving. We truly appreciate every dollar!
  • "Substack has a Nazi problem," declares The Atlantic. Not really. Substack allows writers to self-publish. The vast majority of that which receives eyeballs on Substack is…excellent and decidedly non-Third-Reich-supporting. The Substacks highlighted by this Atlantic article have 100 subscribers (Andkon's Reich Press) and about 1,000 subscribers (White-Papers). For comparison, Substacks like Leah Koenig's The Jewish Table—a beautiful paean to "global Jewish cuisine" at which you can find recipes for cardamom pear coffee cake and riffs on matzo brei—has more than 7,000 subscribers. So, while there may be a few Substacks that spread odious beliefs, there are many more that provide representation to all aspects of Jewish culture and have found far more success than antisemitic lowlifes ever will.
  • The wife of the suspected Gilgo Beach killer, who is currently awaiting trial, has already gotten a documentary deal, angering victims' families.
  • "Amazon is better understood as a massive logistics operation with a vestigial retail operation strapped to its back," writes John Hermann for Intelligencer.
  • The Koch-backed group Americans for Prosperity Action has endorsed former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley in her bid for president.
  • "At the forthcoming UN climate talks, diplomats will push for a tripling of renewable power by 2030," reports Yale Environment 360. "A new analysis finds the world is likely already on track to hit this goal."
  • Please, nobody Sioux over this blackface/Kansas City Chiefs kerfuffle!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: $100,000 Matching Grant Announced for Reason's Annual Webathon!

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Free SpeechReason RoundupIrelandNew ZealandTobaccoSmoking BansNazisEuropeHate Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (395)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Ireland toys with criminalizing speech...

    How British of them.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      They are asking for troubles.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      In my norm Mcdonald voice
      "however stabbing children is still okay"

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        One of his best tweets:

        https://ifunny.co/picture/norm-macdonald-normmacdonald-what-terrifies-me-is-if-isis-were-y8Cs3Nf69

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

          The left loves to jerk itself off about "speaking truth to power," but Norm showed how it's really done at the ESPYs:

          "“And there’s Charles Woodson! How about that? What a season he had. He became the first defensive player to win the Heisman Trophy. Congratulations, Charles, that is something that no one can ever take away from you,” MacDonald said at the end of his monologue. “Unless you kill your wife and a waiter, in which case, all bets are off.”

          1. Nardz   2 years ago

            https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1729891976705720349?t=gJn7Oj6totM4gw39X1Z88w&s=19

            If saying “Irish lives matter” in Ireland is a hate crime that’s the definition of a conquered nation

            [Link]

            1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

              Ireland has been one of those for centuries.

              1. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

                And they LIKE it that way.

            2. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

              As the saying goes, "you can tell who's in charge by who you're not allowed to criticize."

    3. Chumby   2 years ago

      Limerick considering secession?

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Ireland already has laws on the books to stop criminal harassment and laws to stop the incitement of riots.

    There better be a drunk clause or they might as well make the whole place an open air prison.

    1. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

      The British already tried that.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    But last week, for reasons that are unclear, New Zealand's parliament started to reverse that law...

    Their jonesing for lung darts outpaced their jonesing for social engineering.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Government officials, including Willis, have pointed to the fact that lost revenue from cigarette pack taxation was beginning to seed worry...

    But what about all that money they were going to save on treating lung cancer.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

      Someone realized that the sooner they die, the less pension gets paid out.

      1. Anomalous   2 years ago

        This is actually correct.

        1. rbike   2 years ago

          I was always for others smoking if they wanted to.

  5. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

    Please, nobody Sioux over this blackface/Kansas City Chiefs kerfuffle!

    Stealing chumby’s puns.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Hey now, it's "borrowing" on a permanent basis.

      1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

        It's actually just a free product since it's valued at under $1,000. Anyone can just walk in and grab one.

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          Nonsense. Humor is priceless.

      2. mulched   2 years ago

        Indian giver!

    2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

      Commenter_XY should have looked at you!

      1. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

        I should have...you're right.

    3. Minadin   2 years ago

      They used a deliberately misleading photo, then when that was pointed out they said that the red/black with the headdress was even worse>

      And, it turns out that the kid is Native American.

      Oopsies, Deadspin.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        They should sue for defamation and bankrupt Deadspin. It might teach them to think twice before slandering someone.

        1. Minadin   2 years ago

          Maybe they follow their parent company down into the abyss.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        Carron Butler is too damn stupid and unself-aware to realize that he fucked up here, but regardless, it's a great example of why any woke takes should always be dismissed outright.

        In fact, "cultural appropriation" by white people should be encouraged specifically because it pisses these assholes off so much. When they complain about it, they need to be told to shut their fucking mouths because their opinions, ideology, and their very existence have no merit or redeeming value whatsoever.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

          Sorry, Carron Phillips. Carron Butler seems like a decent guy.

          1. Minadin   2 years ago

            Maybe you could teach Mr. Phillips how and when to issue a retraction.

        2. Zeb   2 years ago

          Cultural appropriation is just a completely idiotic complaint all around. Unless you are an isolated tribe in the jungle, that's how culture works.
          Freaking out whenever anyone puts black makeup on their face because there used to be some offensive minstrel shows is similarly retarded.

        3. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   2 years ago

          Disaffected, doomed, bigoted, worthless, right-wing faux libertarians are among my favorite culture war casualties. Those assholes can't be replaced -- by better Americans -- fast enough.

          Carry on, clingers. So far as your betters permit, and not a step beyond. Thank you for your continuing compliance.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Is that all you have to say, Artie? You never addressed the actual comment, & managed to be an asshole at the same time. Fuck off, cling-on.

          2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

            Are you still pissing in your flourishing cape at the thought of running up against Herr Misek, Rev. Artie?

            Fuck Off, Quisling!

          3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

            Rev. Arthur L. Hicklib weighs in with Input #4.

      3. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

        The number of posts from my Amerindian friends on Facebook that thought the whole Redskins kerfuffle was stupid and white knighting was legions (grew up on the Rez so the number is about half of my Facebook friends). Growing up in the Pacific Northwest where everyone was either a Broncos or a Seahawks fan, the only kid who openly supported the Redskins, and wore their jerseys and team jackets was the son of the Native CEO of the tribal casino. And how is the chiefs mascot anymore a cultural stereotype than the Vikings? For fuck sake, plains tribes did wear feather war bonnets, Scandinavians never wore horned helmets. But the former is considered a derogatory stereotype while the latter is perfectly acceptable. Who makes up these asinine, contradictory rules, anyhow?

    4. Ajsloss   2 years ago

      He gave her that one… in the spirit of the pun, he’ll be asking for it back in 3… 2… 1.

    5. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      I seen a Bumper sticker years ago that said "Custer Was Siouxed."

      Why that's "Cultural Appropriation!"...But then again, as fat as I care, Liz can have all she wants.
      🙂
      😉
      I wonder what the Venn Diagram is on those who think "Cultural Appropriation" is a thing and those who don't believe in Intellectual Property Rights. Hmmm...

      1. Anomalous   2 years ago

        I remember "Custer wore an Arrow shirt."

    6. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

      It may sound like Crazy Horse trading to some people, but my interpretation of S230 says the puns belong to the indigenous peoples of Reason and Chumby Stands With Fist in a Dances With Wolfe-type situation.

    7. Chumby   2 years ago

      She reads the comments and has taken the Roundup more libertarian.
      I’m fine if she borrows the injunuity we provide.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Since banning something creates black markets, they will instead…allow a vice, yet tax it quite heavily, which—checks notes—surely avoids that whole black market problem.

    When will they learn to simply ban black markets?

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      Gov bans black markets?
      Churches chicken hardest hit.

      1. BigT   2 years ago

        Black Markets Matter!

    2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      And make a law that says "Obey All Laws" too.
      🙂
      😉

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

        How hard is that?

        1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago (edited)

          Evidently as hard as making a law that says law enforcers must enforce all laws.
          🙂
          😉
          *M.C. Escher infinite regress of Cervantes Watchmen Watching Watchmen on top of a turtle on top of a turtle with turtles all the way down.*
          🙂
          😉

  7. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

    Please, nobody Sioux over this blackface/Kansas City Chiefs kerfuffle!

    Memo to Chumby: You got some competition! 🙂

    1. Chumby   2 years ago (edited)

      I borrowed that pun from her…yesterday.

      Your on a mo pun friendly Roundup.

      1. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

        Chumby...you have no equal. 🙂

  8. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

    At the forthcoming UN climate talks, diplomats will push for a tripling of renewable power by 2030," reports Yale Environment 360. "A new analysis finds the world is likely already on track to hit this goal.

    Leading from behind.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 years ago

      Going to need it in Michigan where Gov Whitmer just signed a bill requiring 100% renewable by 2040. Seems we are going to get those climate refugees afterall.

      https://www.wri.org/news/statement-michigan-enacts-new-climate-laws-and-creates-just-transition-office-fossil-fuel

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        Yeah, the idiots in the Colorado legislature signed a bill recently mandating that 82% of all new car sales to be EVs by 2032.

        It's 17% right now. Not only will they not get there, they don't even have a plan for how they're going to get the infrastructure in place to support it even if they could hit that number. All because they stupidly believe the earth is going to burn up if we don't get everyone in a lithium battery-powered vehicle, or better yet, in a 15 minute city with "gentle density" to be 100% reliant on public transportation with the other dumbshit lemming urbanites.

        1. Homer Thompson   2 years ago

          good luck getting to the slopes from denver during ski season

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

            One of my favorite dumb greenie proposals for the ski industry was the construction of a mag-lev choo choo train. It never goes beyond the Good Idea Fairy stages because reality, geology, and physics aren't kind to greenie morons.

            1. Minadin   2 years ago

              Was the mag-lev train supposed to transport people from Denver to Winter Park, or replace the ski lifts at the resorts, or both?

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

                Take them from Union Station to the resorts. I think one branch to Winter Park, the other along the I-70 corridor.

              2. kevrob   2 years ago

                Florida to Chicago?
                There are a lot of Union Stations .

                1. Minadin   2 years ago

                  Downtown Denver.

          2. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

            Skiing is just all kinds of wrong from the Green point of view.

    2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      Define "renewable." Oil is renewable, on a sufficiently long time.

      Is wind actually renewable? Wind is random, intermittent, and inefficient to harness.

      We're still allowed to build dams, right? Hydro is renewable, persistent, and reliable, even if not every river is suitable for it.

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        No, we cannot build dams.

        1. kevrob   2 years ago

          Hydro bad, m'kay?

          Hydro bad, part deux

      2. HorseConch   2 years ago

        If you consider the actual materials to build, maintain, and repower wind, you have to squint pretty hard for it to actually be renewable. Solar is derived on a similar, possibly more toxic path.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

          Yeah, the green morons don't realize that those wind generators have a shelf life, leak hydraulic fluid like crazy, and still can't support the load demand. It's all "ooo, pretty fan make power!"

          1. Nardz   2 years ago

            They don't care.
            It's about hurting normal people, not saving the world.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

              They consider to the two to be linked.

              1. Nardz   2 years ago

                I'm not certain they do.
                On the surface, sure, but there's a real deep loathing for the world and existence motivating it all.

                1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

                  Eh, it's really nothing more than a modern variation of Rousseau's man unspoiled by civilization archetype, or a secular version of the Garden of Eden. The greenies get this mixed up with their Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism dreams, but that's more or less what drives a lot of it.

          2. Longtobefree   2 years ago

            The dead eagles, General; don't forget the dead eagles.

      3. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

        Biden signed a secret agreement with the watermelons to tear out four dams on the Snake River, hasn't bothered to inform Washington, Oregon or Idaho governors about the plan or the utility companies.

        1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

          Oh and he's hiding behind a confidentiality agreement to avoid releasing the details of the plan.

          1. ElvisIsReal   2 years ago

            Don't worry, leaked drafts of the documents assure us that it's totally necessary.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Mayor Eric Adams has apparently just started going after the landlords who rent to unlicensed pot shops.

    You know who else went after landlords?

    1. The Margrave of Azilia   2 years ago

      Rent-skipping tenants?

    2. Ajsloss   2 years ago

      The CDC?

    3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      Eddie Murphy?
      https://youtu.be/5-3ckX-zSHw?si=WzfmMKyZzLEQSFzV
      🙂
      😉

      1. kevrob   2 years ago

        Tyrone Green?

        cill my landlord

    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 years ago

      Jello Biafra?

    5. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

      Communists?

    6. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

      Tim and Uncle Martin?

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Shamelessly asking for your support, as it is WEBATHON TIME!

    Like shame is something to be proud of anyway.

  11. Sevo   2 years ago

    ""Substack has a Nazi problem," declares The Atlantic..."

    The Atlantic has an honesty problem. Does turd write for them?

    1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      The Atlantic probably has a larger Nazi problem than Substack.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      Remember, anything that resists left-wing ideology is Naziism.

  12. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

    When will the bureaucrats learn?

    Never.

  13. Sevo   2 years ago

    "...Nicola Willis, the country's new finance minister, has publicly pointed to the fact that legislators have realized that this would lead to black-market sales of tobacco..."

    A politico who understands reality exists beyond laws?

  14. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

    NotTheBee claims that black/red kid is actually native American.

    That "sports" writer looks dumber and dumber, woker and woker.

    https://notthebee.com/article/mother-of-young-chiefs-fan-bullied-by-deadspin-he-is-native-american

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

      "Sports writer" needs to be beaten black and red. That's a fucking child in a costume.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        Well, the sports writer is already black, so we're halfway there.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

      Native Americans don't get a blackface card!

    3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      I hope that kid Peter thiels dead spins asses out of existance

    4. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      Skin color is the most important thing?

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        This guy gets it.

        1. Ajsloss   2 years ago

          Not exactly. Skin colors are the most important things.

          1. HorseConch   2 years ago

            Only if it's a dark enough skin color. We went from trump inciting anti-asian hate to asians being white people over the course of one heavily-fortified election. I've been told that hispanics that aren't being hauled in by the NGOs are also white.

            1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

              I remember the first time I heard the term “white hispanic”, it was right Zimmerman,s mugshot didn’t quite match what they were expecting.

      2. Chumby   2 years ago

        That’s what I red too.

  15. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    If you have, in any small way, gotten something from reading Roundup (or even the cursed comment section), please consider giving.

    AS THE MOST BELOVED COMMENTER WHERE'S MY KICKBACK?

    Just kidding. Everyone knows I was replaced with AI after I died of COVID or maybe monkeypox.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      AS THE MOST BELOVED COMMENTER

      Wait, when was this decision made?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

        BEFORE YOU WERE EVEN BORN

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          It wasn't a committe of top men funded by your donations?

      2. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Well at least we know sarc, jeff, and shrike weren't in the running for the prestige.

        1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

          Glad I don't have to pay rent for all the time I spend in your head.

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            No time. 5 seconds to make fun of one of the dumbest people here.

            You know. You and Jeff started shit this morning and now you're acting as the victim. Discuss.

            1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

              You and Jeff started shit this morning...

              You claim 5 seconds but you've been stewing for hours? How cute!

              Only victim here is the guy owed arrears for all that time spent in his head. You poor baby.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

                I’ll add stewing to the list of words you dont understand.

                It is having a memory that isn’t destroyed from alcoholism. Discuss.

                You immediately went to victim mode in the other thread. Lol.

                1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                  Cry more.

                  1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                    I'll add that to the list of phrases you dont understand.

      3. Minadin   2 years ago

        I think KMW mentioned Fist by name at least once that I've seen.

        1. Anomalous   2 years ago

          Are you sure she wasn't using Fist as a verb?

          1. Minadin   2 years ago

            "As Voltaire almost certainly did not say: We may not like what you say, but we will defend to the death Fist of Etiquette's "firsts," Heroic Mulatto's staunch pining for former Reason staffer Lucy Steigerwald, and everyone's frankly unhealthy interest in Robby Soave's grooming habits."

            https://reason.com/2016/11/30/preet-bharara-the-guy-who-subpoenaed-rea/

            1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

              I've outlived them all (except for Soave).

              1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                STEVE SMITH LIVES FOREVER!

        2. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

          SHE BETTER NOT HAVE

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Sure it wasn't RSV or that new thing in China?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

        Might have been climate change or aliens.

    3. mad.casual   2 years ago

      I was replaced with AI

      *That* explains why all your comments have seemed degenerate after 2021!

      1. Jefferson Paul   2 years ago

        Shots fired!

    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 years ago

      Very impressive that you were able to line up a robot replacement with covid pox stalking your mortality.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    "Substack has a Nazi problem," declares The Atlantic.

    The Atlantic's revenue department has a Substack problem.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Everything is Nazi for establishment media except the kids smashing the windows of Jewish businesses and shouting in the streets that a certain nation should be free of Jews. They're anti-racist.

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Most of the antisemitism I see broadly put out lately is coming from the left leaning journalists. So a bit of irony.

        1. Nardz   2 years ago

          So we've seen plenty of anti-white (standard practice for the past decade), anti-Israel, anti-colonial rhetoric. And we've seen whites and jews harassed.
          But what rhetoric have we heard that is specifically anti-jewish?

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

            What specifically? A journalist laughing in video about them being raped and murdered just yesterday. Mehdi Hassan has many posts purely antisemitic.

            Both anti Semitic statements and anti white statements happen. You dont have to dismiss one of them because you want to highlight the other.

            In NYC just over the weekend there were flyers of community jews posted with the star of David reminiscent of the SS in Germany.

            1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

              Forget it, Jesse. Between Herr Misek and Nardz, the Reason Comments have a Nazi problem, and with comments from Mtrueman, Rev. Artie, and Roberta, we also have a Quisling problem.

            2. Nardz   2 years ago

              You're intentionally missing the point by a mile

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Write a clear point then. Instead of excusing one form of attack because you prefer highlighting another.

              2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

                Oh, always! We Mongrel Degenerates can't begin to grasp your Aryan Pure Superman Polylogic!

    2. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

      There's a theme:

      Substack has a Nazi problem.
      NFL has a racism problem.

      Lefty media has an "instigating culture war" problem.

    3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      And 60 of the 100 subscribers are fbi agents

      1. THX1138   2 years ago

        And only three of those are on assignment.

  17. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The wife of the suspected Gilgo Beach killer, who is currently awaiting trial, has already gotten a documentary deal, angering victims' families.

    Double victimized. That should make them as gods in today's world.

    1. markm23   1 year ago

      What's the wife awaiting trial for?

  18. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Another lawfare bid rejected.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/court-rejects-another-bid-keep-president-trump-primary-ballot

    A federal district court in Rhode Island on Monday rejected a bid to disqualify former President Donald Trump from candidacy in the 2024 presidential elections, citing an earlier ruling by an appeals court that rejected a similar claim.

    Chief Judge John J. McConnell of the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island on Monday summarily dismissed a complaint by John Anthony Castro, a lesser-known Republican presidential candidate from Texas, who sought to disqualify President Trump from the ballot.

    That marked another defeat for Mr. Castro, who has filed lawsuits in more than two dozen states over the past few months, including the one in Rhode Island that was dismissed today, to disqualify Trump from the ballot for the 2024 presidential election.

    In recent months, courts in Florida, Colorado, New Hampshire, Minnesota, and Michigan have dismissed his claims, mostly for procedural or jurisdictional reasons, such as a lack of standing or the courts’ refraining from ruling on a political question.

    Judge McConnell’s Monday ruling followed a Nov. 21 ruling (pdf) on the same matter (also brought by Mr. Castro) by a higher court, the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit. The appeals court has appellate jurisdiction over the Rhode Island District Court, so its rulings are binding on the lower court.

    In that earlier ruling, the appeals court affirmed a lower court’s ruling and rejected Mr. Castro’s bid to remove President Trump from the New Hampshire ballot for the 2024 presidential election. The judges reasoned that Mr. Castro failed to show that he suffered “injury in fact”—a required component for bringing the case under Section Three—by Trump’s candidacy, because Mr. Castro’s claim that his votes would be taken away during the 2024 election (should President Trump run) is “too speculative” as of the time Mr. Castro filed his complaint.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      The screaming and tearing of clothes is going to be epic when he wins.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        They're going to kill him. They went way to far, violated the constitution, subverted democracy and broke thousands of laws, and there is no way that they want to face a reckoning for their behavior.

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          Based on the theories of Jack Smith, everyone pushing these lawsuits should be charged with crimes.

          1. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

            Who is going to do it?

            1. JesseAz   2 years ago

              That is the problem with the lefts lawfare. Until both sides have mutually assured destruction it will continue. Doesn't help having Roberts on the USSC thinking allowing this shit to continue upholds the judicial branches integrity.

              1. Ersatz   2 years ago

                how much does launching 2 dozen lawsuits in different states actually cost? Is he paying for this himself... if now - who is footing the bill?

        2. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

          If he can find a way to win with all of the ballot shenanigans, they will kill him. They are hoping he loses (fair or foul) and the leftists' nightmare will end.

          1. HorseConch   2 years ago

            They have dug in so deep that even their own are starting to question it. They may get dealth with whether they get rid of their Trump problem or not.

        3. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          These Optimates should keep in mind what has gone before. It will be their eventual downfall, but it's going to be very messy.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            They think they are way too smart and way too right for things to go south. You don't get into the top echelons of the FBI, CIA, DHS and the uniparty without being pathologically narcissistic and overly self-confident.

            These people honestly think that whatever they believe is right, whatever they do is justified because of who they are, and whatever they attempt is prudent because they are so incredibly smart.

            If they decide to assassinate Trump they won't believe that they won't get away with it.

            1. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

              See JFK.

              1. Chumby   2 years ago

                They’ll be playing head games with us?

        4. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

          They’re going to kill him.

          That would bring war. A cold one.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            I think we're already at that cold war stage. Doing that might just make it go hot.

    2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      John Anthony Castro, a lesser-known Republican presidential candidate from Texas, who sought to disqualify President Trump from the ballot.

      Can we just call this guy what he is? He's not a legitimate candidate, his sole purpose in running is to artificially attempt to create "standing" so he can file suit in every state to remove Trump. He's an operative, or controlled opposition. He's not even showing up in any polls.

    3. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

      I guess that whole Baudsen/Paule argument is just bullshit.

  19. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    The bank speaks.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/did-deutsche-bank-just-destroy-new-york-ags-case-against-trump

    A Deutsche Bank executive may have just tanked New York Attorney General Letitia James' lawsuit against former President Donal Drump - which revolved around portraying the German lender as Trump's biggest victim in an alleged scheme to inflate his assets in order to obtain favorable terms from banks and insurers.

    David Williams, who directly worked on at least one of several loans obtained by Trump over several decades, testified on Tuesday in Manhattan that it's "atypical, but not entirely unusual" for a bank to internally slash a client's stated asset values by 50% and approve a loan anyway, as they did with Trump, Bloomberg reports.

    "It just depends on the circumstances," said Williams, a managing director at the bank.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Big surprise, banks know how to make decisions.

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

        They are at least wise enough to rely on appraisals if the claimed value is over $1,000,000.

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      This is why the judge pre judged the facts. So he wouldn't have to listen to the actual facts.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

        And that's the problem for Trump. This clown judge is the finder of fact however ridiculous his conclusions. I would hope that he gets humiliated at the appellate level but it's hardly a slam dunk.

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          He has already been smacked down by an appeals court twice.

        2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

          How is that even slightly legal? How can a judge literally just make facts up and declare them as reality?

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            New York. Same thing happened with the Fox vs Dominion suit.

          2. Longtobefree   2 years ago

            Lots and lots of 'judges' go along with the trans bullshit that men can actually become women.

  20. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Jeff will dismiss thus story as he hates non narratives, but a pretty fucked up story.

    Operation Atlantis was an investigation opened against Euro Pacific to target the bank leadership, namely Peter Schiff, an outspoken critic of quite a few governments. The investigation was opened without reference if a crime. Despite scouring its books, nothing was ever found.

    The media reporting on the unfounded investigation led to a series of calamities for the bank, culminating in it being shuttered by a Puerto Rican regulator — with the IRS falsely taking credit for the closure and suggesting it was because of money laundering and tax evasion, even though its investigation substantiated neither of the charges.

    The claims by the IRS were never founded. Investigation was closed. So government leaked the investigation after finding nothing, causing clients to flee. IRS then took credit for the closure as a win, despite no laws broken.

    The journalists who pushed the story at the governments request (the ones Jeff demands w3 listen exclusively to) took evidence given to them, manipulated testimony and interviews, and the bank closed.

    Schiff has successfully sued 2 of the journalists for their defamation. Ironically at least one of the journalists got an award for the story.

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/court-says-media-outlets-defamed-conservative-economist-orders-them-to-pay-massive-settlement

    All sorts of fuckery in the article.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      The IRS ought to fucking know that Peter Schiff is a made man for the establishment, whatever his criticisms. You need special permission from higher-ups to take on guys like that, which is why guys like David Frum and other left-wing pundits have been calling for the government to nationalize Twatter and Space X from Musk.

  21. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Biden says he stopped inflation and it is the evil corporations refusing to lower prices.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/11/27/remarks-by-president-biden-on-new-actions-to-strengthen-supply-chains-lower-costs-for-families-and-help-americans-get-the-goods-they-need/

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Only the keen mind and sharp intellect of Joe Biden can direct our economy.

  22. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

    The Koch-backed group Americans for Prosperity Action has endorsed former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley in her bid for president.

    Surprising!

    1. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

      Not really when you listen to her and realize she is talking about sensible things. She also has the best chance to take the Presidency for the Republicans. There is that downside of her being a woman and a woman of color no less. That might be had to sell to the base.

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        What color is she?

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          Pinko, like Moderation4ever.

      2. Ajsloss   2 years ago

        She also has the best chance to take the Presidency for the Republicans.

        Is that why she's polling so far behind Trump?

        1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

          it can be so hard for simpletons to understand the difference between primaries and general elections.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            Wish harder.

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago

            The same finding regarding the amendment applies to the general dumdum.

        2. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

          But we know that Trump is so upset over losing the 2020 election that he is not eating. Kevin McCarthy was forced to go down to talk to him and get him to eat. He could starve before the 2024 election is even held and the polling will not matter.

          1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

            You suck at story telling.

      3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        "Sensible things" like requiring everyone on the Internet to be registered with the Government?

        Perhaps your handle should be "BootOnAHumanFace4Ever."

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          No. Sensible things like funding every foreign war without question.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

            Well, "We have always been at war with _Fill In The Blank_."
            🙂
            😉

      4. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

        Sensible things like war with everyone?
        You really should kill yourself

      5. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        Not really when you listen to her and realize she is talking about sensible things.

        Note how "moderates" always seem to talk in the most sweeping of generalities.

    2. LIBertrans   2 years ago

      Ah, the Herbert Hoover, George Wallace and Prohibition Party lobbies are gonna teach us how banning production and trade and subsidizing asset-forfeiture looting causes prosperity. A Quisling harridan like Nikki Duh is the perfect vehicle for that!

  23. JesseAz   2 years ago

    California is leading the way on protecting democracy by ending it.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/california-leading-trump-off-ballots-2024

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

      Won't Trump will get zero electoral college votes in CA whether he's on the ballot or not? What's the point?

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        So they can point to the total national vote when he wins to discredit him like they did when Hillary lost.

    2. Zeb   2 years ago

      I knew this was going to happen when everyone started saying "insurrection" as often as possible. But I'm still amazed how retarded it is.

      1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

        It’s wish casting.

      2. LIBertrans   2 years ago

        Mirror, mirror, on the wall...

  24. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Just in case anyone missed the news. Nikki is the new dreamy politician.

    https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/koch-backed-americans-prosperity-nikki-haley-endorses-nikki-haley

    1. The Margrave of Azilia   2 years ago

      Maybe Reason's young staffers can stage a revolt? I hear that's all the rage in corporate circles.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

        Kmw kmw, the commenters are revolting
        Kmw "I know, they stink on ice"

        1. Ersatz   2 years ago

          For my Part I think that has been the History of the World

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 years ago

        I hear she’s past her prime. Some gay black guy said so, so it must be true.

    2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      Kochs out for Haley!

      Haley makes the Kochs rise up to support her!

      Okay I'm done.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        What a Kochy post.

      2. Ajsloss   2 years ago

        Wait until she ends her campaign and the Kochs have to pull out.

        1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

          Hah!

        2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Should she announce that Koch is supporting her at Ball State University?

        3. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          The Koch came too early.

        4. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

          Could be sloppy.

          1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

            It's often the case when someone else gets there first.

            1. Ajsloss   2 years ago

              Exactly. Show me a clean and orderly bu-Koch-ee and I'll eat my hat.

      3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        She wants the Koch's out so she can geld them.

      4. Anomalous   2 years ago

        Does that mean that the other candidates are Koch blocked?

      5. mad.casual   2 years ago

        Kochs out for a Lady Dick in 3 inch heels.

      6. Nardz   2 years ago

        Nimrata loves the Koch

      7. Chumby   2 years ago

        Those monocles don’t polish themselves.

  25. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Jeff and shrike applaud.

    Byron York
    @ByronYork
    Cause for concern: The Biden team is 'working with social media platforms to counter misinformation.' This time it seeks to 'counter' reports that food and other items cost a lot after Biden-era inflation. From WP: (link)

    https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1728750793577087233

    Paid for by your tax dollars.

    1. Anomalous   2 years ago

      Make those Ministry of Truth minions earn their pay.

  26. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Fuck and Tabarnak Trudeau, Love Alberta.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/alberta-premier-defies-trudeau-carbon-agenda-invokes-sovereignty-act

    It is an action which multiple red states in the US have undertaken: Blocking carbon controls ingrained in "green power" initiatives conjured by the federal government.

    Now it appears the momentum has spread to Canada through Alberta's conservative leadership as Premier Danielle Smith defies the Trudeau regime by invoking the province's recently drafted Sovereignty Act.

    The Sovereignty Act is designed to give Alberta's legislative assembly the power to identify any federal programs or actions that violate Alberta's constitution, the government would then refuse to implement those programs. The implementation of the act means that finally, an open dialogue on the existential threat of the UN's "sustainable development goals" and Agenda 2030 has begun in Canada.

    In other words, the supposed crisis is a fraud and there's no reason for any nation, province or state to sacrifice their power grids.

    When people face the possibility of freezing or starving there is little chance they are going to listen to unfounded claims of climate doomsday from a bunch of ultra-rich yacht sailing private jet-setting carbon-spewing hypocrite elites.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Alberta has been doing some things lately like pulling out of the Canada Pension Plan, amongst others, that make me think that they may be getting ready to bolt.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

        Is secession a real possibility? How would that work in Canada? Serious question.

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          Not a clue. Canada isn't a real country and in some aspects the provinces have more independence than states in the US.
          Not too many states have tariffs against other states, but it happens in Canada. Then there's the fact that only one road and a rail line connects the West to the East and far more Canadians interact with their neighboring states than with the other half of their country.

          Plus, while Western Canada pays for the East's social safety net, the East actively hates the West like Palestinians do the Jews, and wants to hurt it even when doing so is Pyrrhic.

          Then there's the fact that the northern indigenous territories like Nunavut and provinces like Quebec and Newfoundland really are truly unique cultures in a way that the US doesn't have, and your looking at a house of cards.

          1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

            Is BC as kooky as the rest of the left coast, though?

            1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

              The Interior? No.
              The Lower Mainland and Victoria? Oh hell yes.

  27. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Amazon is better understood as a massive logistics operation with a vestigial retail operation strapped to its back...

    ...and a portable urinal strapped to its dick.

  28. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Here are some old blog posts from the President of Media Matters Angelo Caruson. He made fun of trans people, mocked “jewry” and “jewish gold,” and praised a member of the KKK.

    Media Matters led a campaign for advertisers to leave X because they claimed ads were appearing near white supremacist content.

    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

      "Far right media matters"

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "Right-wing Extremist Media Matter"

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          According to Pluggo, Media Matters is unbiased.

    2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      By the way, I find all of those statements to be completely acceptable. Joking about bags of Jewish gold and jokes about Bangladeshi trannies being ugly aren’t even really offensive.

      It’s just the obvious “rules for thee and not for me” about the whole thing. If you can’t live up to your own standards, then it may not be a useful standard.

      1. Nardz   2 years ago

        ^

      2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        If, as Media Matter's claimed, Musk's statement qualifies as anti-Semitic, then Angelo Caruson is the KKK Grand Dragon.

  29. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

    ""Substack has a Nazi problem," declares The Atlantic."

    The Atlantic has a cultural Marxist and anti-white racist problem.

  30. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Trying to hide it.

    https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_0efa860e-8e11-11ee-9ba2-cfc194baab0d.html

    The Biden administration is under fire after a website to help keep federal funding of union work transparent disappeared.

    The federal site in question tracks what is called “official time,” a term for when taxpayer-funded federal employees use part of their work hours to work on behalf of a public union.

    The Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit group that works on these issues, released a report on the Biden administration change. The tracking site was on the Office of Personnel Management’s website since 2013, but appears to have been taken down over the summer.

    “Unions and Democrat administrations generally seek to maximize official time, since shifting the costs of union administration to taxpayers frees up union treasuries to increase engagement in politics, lobbying and other ideological activities that advance progressive interests,” the Freedom Foundation said. “Republican administrations are generally more skeptical of official time, viewing it as an unjustified giveaway to unions at taxpayers’ expense.”

    "It may not sound like a big deal at first glance, but when we're talking about federal employees doing the union's business on government time -- that means the union is passing that expense on to the taxpayer and the union gets to put its money to other uses, like politics and lobbying, and regular Americans are covering that cost,” Varner said. “This administration is showing us exactly to whom they are accountable - and it's not the American taxpayer."

    Former President Donald Trump issued an executive order in May of 2018 to regulate and limit official time use in the federal government, but President Joe Biden quickly repealed that order after taking office.

  31. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The Koch-backed group Americans for Prosperity Action has endorsed former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley in her bid for president.

    Why did they wait so long into the race?

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      They wanted to see if Reason's tone was in the same octave range as their DeSantis writing.

  32. Spiritus Mundi   2 years ago

    Please, nobody Sioux over this blackface/Kansas City Chiefs kerfuffle!

    Hey! That is Chumby's shtick.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      Ya know, I have never seen Liz wolf and chumbys in the same room at the same time... Also chumbys came back right at the end of lizs vacation

      1. Chumby   2 years ago

        I’m happy that I…she was able to feather that in.

  33. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    At the forthcoming UN climate talks, diplomats will push for a tripling of renewable power by 2030...

    Thank God Ted Kennedy isn't alive to see this from the deck of his Hyannis Port compound.

  34. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

    "The Koch-backed group Americans for Prosperity Action has endorsed former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley in her bid for president."

    LOL

    Who cares that she's a neocon with a Crazy Plan to Require Verification on Social Media?

    What really matters is that she'd do exactly what billionaires want on immigration! 🙂

    #CheapLaborAboveAll

    1. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

      She is also willing to talk about reforming SS, Medicare and Medicaid. Talks realistically about abortion. Has the skill set for the job. But don't let that stand in your way, stick by your old white man.

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        What color is she? That’s important.

      2. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

        "stick by your old white man"

        Who is my old white man, exactly?

        Trump, who I criticize so often his dead-enders here diagnose me with "TDS"?

        Biden, the guy I often point out deserves his low approval rating, especially on the economy?

        I won't stop pointing out what's bad about Haley just because she's 2 degrees more "marginalized" than other bad candidates.

      3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        She is also willing to talk about reforming SS, Medicare and Medicaid.

        Gosh, that's never happened at any point in the last 25 years!

        Talks realistically about abortion.

        "Accept whatever the Democrats will agree to" is hardly any sort of political principle other than typical neocon jobberism.

        Has the skill set for the job.

        So do the other candidates other than Ramaswamy. Hell, even Trump's already had the job and did okay, other than his COVID fuckups like listening to the "experts." What's so fucking unique about her in that regard?

        But don’t let that stand in your way, stick by your old white man.

        Oh, are we going with the identity politics bullshit now? How "moderate."

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

          I'll note that 2/3 of your stupid list of qualifications consists solely of her "talking." No wonder you like her so much, but I'd say that's not any different from what any other center-right hosehead has done over the last generation.

    2. Witch-Burning Nazi   2 years ago

      So now Neocon Nikki is a libertarian fave? Well, surprise, surprise!

    3. Chumby   2 years ago

      I just saw Haley’s comment.

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        Did she wave?

  35. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    ...blackface/Kansas City Chiefs kerfuffle!

    At some point Deadspin has gone past diminishing race card returns and moved balls deep into self-parody.

    1. Chumby   2 years ago

      Ladyballs

      1. Stuck in California   2 years ago

        https://www.dailywire.com/videos/lady-ballers

  36. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

    How hum, another day of treating the constitution like used toilet paper.

    Many people insist that governments aren’t involved in censorship, but they are. And now, a whistleblower has come forward with an explosive new trove of documents, rivaling or exceeding the Twitter Files and Facebook Files in scale and importance.

    Read the whole thing. It would be shocking if we weren’t already all conspiracy theorists now.

    In the spring of 2020, CTIL began tracking and reporting disfavored content on social media, such as anti-lockdown narratives like “all jobs are essential,” “we won’t stay home,” and “open America now.” CTIL created a law enforcement channel for reporting content as part of these efforts. The organization also did research on individuals posting anti-lockdown hashtags like #freeCA and kept a spreadsheet with details from their Twitter bios. The group also discussed requesting “takedowns” and reporting website domains to registrars.

    CTIL’s approach to “disinformation” went far beyond censorship. The documents show that the group engaged in offensive operations to influence public opinion, discussing ways to promote “counter-messaging,” co-opt hashtags, dilute disfavored messaging, create sock puppet accounts, and infiltrate private invite-only groups.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 years ago

      Also from the 'at least Biden follows the constitution' files:

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/personalfinance/813000-student-loan-borrowers-are-now-getting-emails-that-their-loans-are-wiped-out-following-bidens-recent-reforms/ar-AA1kGk0i

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      Facts changed! You're a conspiracy theorist for noting earlier!

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      Michael Shellenberger is just plain old libertarian. He's not Libertarian Plus, so he gets ignored.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        He's an actual left-libertarian which for the Left Libertarian Plus is the worst kind of libertarian. More worse than even the Mises caucus.

    4. ElvisIsReal   2 years ago

      It's probably too late for anybody to see this, but I wrote about this today:

      In the Battle for Free Speech, It's Later Than You Think

      Official misinformation incoming........

      https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/in-the-battle-for-free-speech-its

  37. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Part 2, regarding how Chicago poses a threat to the Republic (long read).

    https://www.chicagocontrarian.com/blog/chicago-grave-threat-american-republic

    Being an attorney who actually defends the Constitution in Illinois is a lonely pursuit, rife with condemnation from the rest of the legal and political swamp currently in power.

    The attorneys argued in a motion that a state agency created in 2009, the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission (TIRC), was an unconstitutional infringement on the judiciary, an argument that, if embraced by the courts, could have far reaching impact on Illinois.

    Through the state legislature, members of TIRC have been granted the authority to overturn murder convictions that had long been settled in the courts.

    TIRC was created in large part through the efforts of Kwame Raoul in 2009 in the wake of allegations that former Chicago Police Commander Jon Burge tortured confessions from African American suspects. In order to push the case against Burge, Raoul ignored massive evidence that at least some of the cases against Burge were false, including the Madison Hobley case. Hobley, convicted of setting a fire that killed seven people, was freed from prison by a corrupt governor. No judicial proceeding had ever ruled in his innocence.

    But surely, at some point, Raoul was held accountable by some fellow legislators. Surely some elected officials reviewed the TIRC statute and observed the constitutional abuses it enshrined.

    Not one. In fact, Raoul, a founding member of this legal monstrosity, is now the attorney general for Illinois, the highest criminal justice position in the state. Raoul’s ascendency to this position is yet another example that obeying party factions, not merit, is the key to career success in Chicago.

    Let’s move on, then, as the demise of Illinois, while dark and depressing, is important to understand the survival of the larger republic.

    There is one more stage to this cruel, pathetic farce. TIRC could likely never have been created in a two-party system. The dominance of the Democratic Party in Chicago, Cook County, and Illinois resembles a Soviet-like outpost more and more every day, complete with a ministry of propaganda disguised as journalism.

    The so-called conservatives in Illinois turned their back on the police decades ago. The hard work of truly reforming Illinois appears too difficult and risky for them, even as Illinois poses a larger threat to the federal system.

    And there you have it, not only a blatant sell out of the legislation to a radical movement rife with corruption and revolutionary motives, but also a refusal of nearly every party with the power to stop it refusing to do so, save two attorneys working in Will County.

    1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      Hobley, convicted of setting a fire that killed seven people, was freed from prison by a corrupt governor. No judicial proceeding had ever ruled in his innocence.

      I don't know how the pardon power works in Illinois, but in theory, it's meant to be unlimited. The governor is allowed to get it wrong, or to pardon people for corrupt reasons. In fact, it undermines the existence of the pardon power if it has to go through a "judicial proceeding."

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago (edited)

        A pardon is a check against judicial power as well against prosecutorial power.

      2. mad.casual   2 years ago

        I think it's a statement not an argument.

        Ryan forgave a lot of people before himself being convicted of unrelated corruption predating his term/the pardons/commutations. Setting aside the question of whether he should've had that ability or not, Hobley wasn't otherwise determined to be innocent for some manner of judiciary failure or oversight.

        1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

          I just think it’s going afield of the issue to get upset about gubernatorial use of the pardon power. Beyond that, if we restrict the concept of the pardon to the idea that it is only for the truly innocent, it’s giving up on one of the checks and balances between the branches. There are reasons to leave the pardon power unfettered.

          You can argue that people misled the governor into pardoning someone who shouldn’t have been. You can advocate for more restrained use of it. But the remedy for a governor or President misusing the pardon power is political. Vote him out or impeach him. It has nothing to do with this legislative body that is apparently violating the balance of power by summarily releasing some convicts.

          1. mad.casual   2 years ago

            Neither the statement that no court ever found Hobley not guilty nor the statement that Ryan, duly convicted of crimes committed while Secretary of State, was corrupt is inaccurate.

            The assertion that someone needs to check gubernatorial pardoning power rather than checking Raoul's or TIRC's ethics before they 'misinform' Ryan, or checking Ryan's ethics before his ascension to the Governor's office is your own fabrication in between the two facts above.

  38. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson lashes out and blames “right wing extremists” for Chicago’s problems and says Republicans are mad that black people are free.

    [video]

    Chicago last had a Republican mayor in 1931.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Mayor BJ is a piece of work. Violent crime, especially car theft is up by quite a bit since he took office. He gets cover from our own lying fatfuck governor.

      https://cwbchicago.com/2023/11/chicago-crime-not-down-contrary-to-pritzker-claim.html

      Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker unloaded a whopper of a lie on Monday that would make even the Chicago Police Department’s boldest press relations executive blush.

      “Violent crime has been coming down [in Chicago], actually for three years, but in particular over the last year,” Pritzker said during an afternoon Q&A with Crain’s Chicago Business, according to The Center Square.

      “Shootings and murders have come down significantly,” Pritzker continued. “Again, it doesn’t make anyone feel safer to just hear a statistic; it will take some time, but that is something people should know.”

      “[The Chicago Police Department] publishes statistics where you can see where the problem areas are with car thefts and robberies and so on, but shootings and murders have come down significantly,” Pritzker said.

      Let’s take a look at those statistics published by CPD, governor. Here are the year-to-date historical comparisons from its most recent report, dated November 19.

      Violent crime, a term defined by the FBI, includes the murder, criminal sexual assault, robbery, and aggravated battery categories on CPD’s chart.

      Criminal sexual assaults are up in comparison to every year since 2019. Robberies are way, way up compared to those years. Aggravated battery has increased from last year but is down compared to earlier years. And, yes, while murders have declined, they remain 23% higher than 2019.

      Overall, Chicago’s violent crime is up 18.3% compared to 2019, according to CPD’s “CompStat” data. It’s up 16.8% compared to 2020. It’s up 17.1% versus 2021. And it’s up 6.3% compared to last year.

      What is our governor smoking?

      The Grand Central (25th) District is struggling with a 128% increase in robberies this year. Robberies are up 125% there compared to 2019. Murders in the district are up 50% from last year and up 60% compared to 2019.

      Robberies in the Shakespeare (14th) District are up 57% from last year. Compared to 2019, they’re up by 128%, that’s 198 cases, more than offsetting the five fewer homicides, 16 fewer sexual assaults, and one fewer aggravated battery.

      The Near West (12th) District has seen six fewer murders this year than in 2019. Unfortunately, it has experienced two more sexual assaults, 32 more aggravated batteries, and 453 more robberies.

      On the North Side, the Town Hall (19th) District CompStat historical comparisons are almost all in the red. Every single category, violent and non-violent, is up this year compared to every year since (and including) 2019. The only exception is murder. Town Hall has had four of those this year, which is flat compared to 2019 and 2020. It’s up one from 2021 and down six from last year.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Illinois really needs to separate from Chicago.

        1. creech   2 years ago

          Does Chicago then become a state with two senators?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            I favor territorial status for Chicago. No senators; no representatives.

            1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

              We could just give them to Lake Michigan.

          2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

            I propose we force Canada to take them.

            1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

              NO!

              1. Chumby   2 years ago

                You gave us Anne Murray, Bryan Adams, Celine Dion, and Nickelback. That is the least you could do.

                1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

                  And Alanis Moresette. The only thing ironic was that nothing in her song was actually ironic.

                  1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

                    But we'll give you some credit for Shania and Jewel Staitte. So, you won't have to take Detroit, too.

    2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      I've heard that Chicago is MAGA country, though. Clearly a dangerous environment for gay black actors.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      Mayor Urkel is a typical marxist slack-jaw. Anything that goes wrong while his side is in charge is always the fault of the kulaks, wreckers, and counter-revolutionaries.

      Nuke Chicago (and Evanston) today, and make Illinois great again.

  39. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

    "Last week, in Dublin, three young schoolchildren were stabbed by an Algerian-born man."

    Koch-funded libertarianism tells us exactly how to handle this situation: Give him a slap on the wrist. Then invite him to immigrate to the US.

    #FreeTheCriminals
    #EmptyThePrisons
    #OpenTheBorders

  40. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    The Capitol cops beat the hell out of innocent J6 protesters, and the videos are finally coming out

    We saw the old guy in the white shirt invited in earlier. J6 was an inside job.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Previously censored video re-emerges showing Trump Supporters PROTECTING Police officers on January 6th from suspected Antifa agitators..

      1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

        Yeah but they were trespassing.

    2. sarcasmic   2 years ago

      Worst. Insurrection. Ever.

    3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

      The old guy in the white shirt was an illegal trespasser, right?
      Why should he be given the benefit of the doubt?

      If he was an immigrant crossing the border without permission, you would not hesitate to demand that officers of the law use force against him to haul him back.

      But the entire mob crossed the property boundary without permission into the Capitol. Why should they get sympathy?

      1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

        If he was an immigrant crossing the border without permission, you would not hesitate to demand that officers of the law use force against him to haul him back.

        And what is your stance on what to do with an illegal immigrant crossing a border?

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

          Are we going by my rules, or ML's rules?

          According to ML's rules, state violence is justified to stop the trespasser. Except if the person is from ML's tribe and can be used as a useful pawn to push his narrative to help Trump regain power, then it's time to throw principles out the window.

          1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

            No, I wanted your position, since you're posing an argument of double-standards. Yet by your framing, you seem to imply that this guy definitely deserved to be beaten. Do you apply this consistent standard to people illegally immigrating to a country?

            And here's my point. If you think A) This was a violent criminal who was being beaten in a defensive manner, and B) Illegal immigrants do not deserve to be beaten merely for crossing a border, then you have an identical double-standard. So the call out of double-standards comes from a disingenuous place.

            You might then argue that entering the Capitol Building on January 6 and crossing into the US to seek asylum are substantially different things, so it's okay to have different responses to these things. Which I agree with-but then your argument about double standards is even more meaningless because it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. These two things are not similar.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

              Sure. Here is the brief version.

              Government exists to protect our rights and facilitate the exercise of our liberty. That is its "mission statement". The property that government owns, it does so in furtherance of this mission. The US Capitol is public property because that is where it decides on the laws appropriate for implementing this mission. Having rules for trespassing at the US Capitol is appropriate here because trespassers would, in general, interfere with this mission. (Exceptions to be made for conduct of normal business affairs, stuff like that.) On the other hand, public property like public roads are for facilitating transportation of goods and people to and fro, in furtherance of freedom of movement and freedom of association. Having rules for trespassing on this public property would NOT be appropriate because it would hinder the exercise of these liberties.

              So if an undocumented immigrant crossed the border, was not otherwise an international criminal or carrying some horrible disease, and was using only public roads for transportation, then I would not regard him as "trespassing" and I would not advocate for the use of state violence to return him anywhere.

              But if an undocumented immigrant, or anyone, went on to the US Capitol grounds to disrupt the lawful proceedings of Congress, I would regard that as trespassing, because that would be hindering Congress' work to fulfill the government's mission statement. So I would say that state force would be justified to prosecute the crime of trespassing. Citizen or not, it wouldn't matter though.

              Clear enough?

              1. Zeb   2 years ago

                So, do you think that every disruptive protest in the capitol should be treated like Jan 6? There is traditionally some degree of tolerance for protest that non-violently breaks laws. Would you support a more strict enforcement of trespassing and laws against disrupting official congressional proceedings against all protests in the capitol that don't strictly follow the rules?

                1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

                  And what does that stricter stance imply for future Antifa riots? Do we finally get to break out Ma Deuce and clean those fuckers off the roads?

                2. JesseAz   2 years ago

                  He was defending the Palestinian protests that had assaults and congressional disruptions last week. He is a living double standard as well as a living double wide.

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

                    This is a total lie, as usual.

                3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

                  So, do you think that every disruptive protest in the capitol should be treated like Jan 6?

                  Not necessarily. I said that state force "would be justified" though, because technically it is breaking the law. I agree with you that nonviolent protest should not generate a violent state response, and the state should use a great deal of discretion and patience in its response to protests.

      2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        Trespassing! Shoot to kill!

      3. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "The old guy in the white shirt was an illegal trespasser, right?"

        I know that you've seen enough video of doors being opened and the crowd being ushered into the building by the Hill Police to know that your trespassing narrative is bullshit, but look at you pretend.

        You don't get to invite someone on your property and then shoot them for trespassing.

        Reason #2,465,988 that I call you a Nazi.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

          Fuck off. Officers retreating to a more defensible position is not "inviting" the aggressors in.

          I suppose the French army "invited" the Nazis in when they retreated in 1940, right? God you are such a tool.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

            Fuck off. They opened the doors, removed the barricades, gave them directions and even escorted tours around the building.

            Hundreds of videos posted here in the comments, some today, conclusively proves you are lying. And it is lying. I know you’ve seen many of them. But paid politruk that you are you choose to deliberately lie.

            You're such a fucking Nazi.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago (edited)

              This is complete bullshit. You lie compulsively. None of the videos today show anyone giving tours around the building. Even the videos that you presented today are misleading in their captions. You're pushing narratives for your tribe. Post the full raw unedited video of what you claim.

              1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

                Me: “They opened the doors, removed the barricades, gave them directions and even escorted tours around the building. Hundreds of videos posted here in the comments, some today, conclusively proves you are lying.”

                Jeff: “This is complete bullshit. You lie compulsively. None of the videos today show anyone giving tours around the building.”

                See what we have to deal with folks? Elementary school sophistry that is all pinned on hoping nobody has reading comprehension.

                Here he deliberately ignored the allusion to other days, restricted it to “today”, and ignored the words “doors”, “barricades”, and “directions” solely focusing on the the one thing that wasn’t posted “today”.

                And the funny thing is he thinks that he is being clever and that people will fall for it. What a fucking joke.

                In addition, I know for a fact Jeff has seen the videos showing occurrences he claims not to have seen, the deceitful fuck.

                I’m not at my computer right now so I can’t access my bookmarks, but can the rest of you start posting the videos that Lying Jeffy is claiming aren’t real?

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

                  You wrote:
                  Hundreds of videos posted here in the comments, some today, conclusively proves you are lying.

                  None of the videos posted today conclusively show anything of the sort. And you know it, but you are just playing your usual sophist games. You are such an asshole.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

          ML's story of how Jan. 6 happened:

          Trump told the crowd to go to the Capitol and protest peacefully.

          Crowd showed up, was doing very peaceful things. Very very peaceful. The most peaceful things ever.

          Antifa agitators and FBI informants whispered into everybody's ears, "Hey guys, let's go smash some windows and break into the Capitol!"

          The crowd, which was totally committed to doing peaceful things, nevertheless mindlessly obeyed the Antifa agitators and FBI informants and smashed windows and broke into the Capitol too.

          The Capitol police, seeing all this, said "Hey, look at those guys breaking into the Capitol. Let's invite them in!" So they invited the whole mob in.

          But then, they started pepper-spraying the mob and beating the mob and one of them shot St. Ashli Babbitt. Why would the Capitol Police, which was so nice and cordial to invite the mob in, now turn on the mob to beat them and spray them with pepper spray and shoot them and MURDER them? Who knows? Probably because they were given instructions by Nancy Pelosi to do so.

          So the mob of MAGA patriots were innocent dupes of Antifa agitators and FBI informants, who mindlessly followed their insidious advice, and were not responsible for smashing windows and breaking into the Capitol, they had no agency of their own. They should not be prosecuted because they are morons. The End.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            Yeah, despite the sneering tone of a Nazi politruk's narration and your omission of the speaker's office action and the FBI and DHS agent provocateur's presence in the crowd, that's essentially what happened and there's video and email receipts to prove it.

            Your extremist narrative however, has been conclusively disproven by hard evidence time and time again. Whether it's a cop being beaten to death with a fire extinguisher or your "trespassing" narrative being contradicted by hundreds of hours of video showing hill police removing barricades, opening doors, escorting protesters and giving them fist bumps.

            1. JesseAz   2 years ago

              Not only does jeff support shooting unarmed conservative protestoes, he also defended terrorist enhancements for the PB because they knocked over a fence.

            2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

              Right. They are not responsible for their actions because they are morons.

              1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                Patsies, not morons. Pelosi and Wray set them up.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

                  I see. But they still decided to break into the Capitol building nonetheless, right? I mean, they must be responsible for their own actions at some point?

      4. VinniUSMC   2 years ago

        Chemjeff extraordinary dipshit thinks that the US Capitol is private property, and US borders are imaginary.

  41. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

    If your defense is that you never took an oath to "support the Constitution", then you may want to rethink your legal strategy.

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-oath-support-constitution-colorado-insurrection-1847482

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Ha ha ha ha
      Go fuck yourself you anti-democratic weasels and your fascist attempts to keep him off the ballot.

      In their appeal against the Colorado lawsuit, Trump's lawyers reiterated that the wording of Section Three does not apply to people running for president and that Trump technically did not swear an oath to "support" the Constitution. Instead, during his January 2017 inauguration, Trump swore to "preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution during his role as president.

      What the fuck is "support"?

      1. Super Scary   2 years ago

        If you don't use the same verbiage as them, you're a nazi insurrectionist.

      2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

        We both know that if anyone on Team Blue had used the exact same language as Trump, you would be having a cow.

        "Look at that anti-American asshole, he's straight up admitting he doesn't support the Constitution, just like I suspected all along!"

        But since he's on Team Red:

        "Well duh, it's not in the oath, fuck off with your TDS bullshit man!"

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

          So you admit it's not about what he said, but the pre-crime scenario in your head that someone would bitch about Team Blue had they said the same thing.

          Ok then. That moved pretty fast to step two in the three step process.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            So you admit it’s not about what he said, but the pre-crime scenario in your head that someone would bitch about Team Blue had they said the same thing.

            Lying Jeffy's modus operandi on 80% of his posts here.

      3. Zeb   2 years ago

        "Support" is what the text of the 14th says. But it's irrelevant since it doesn't apply to the president anyway. And even accepting the ridiculous premise that Jan 6 was an insurrection, I have yet to see anything to convince me that Trump had a hand in planning or participating in any attempt to violently influence the outcome.

        1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

          The testimony of the sociologist in the Colorado trial was hilarious. In order to conclude this, you had to say that Trump was speaking in code, and this guy cracked the code, which was worked out between Trump and his extremist followers.

          He meant it literally when he said “fight,” and he was lying when he said “peacefully.”

        2. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

          "Any office, civil or military, under the United States" doesn't include the Presidency?

    2. sarcasmic   2 years ago

      “Then, I have an Article II, where I have to the right to do whatever I want as president"

      -Trump

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

        And what was that context of that statement dumbass? He was talking a specific power regarding firing political appointees. But youre such a dumb leftist fuck you’ll blindly just push the lefts narratives without inspection.

        You fucked this argument up years ago on your sqrsly sock as well.

        1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

          Must. Defend. Trump.

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            Must. Defend. Accuracy.

            Now you're just admitting to pushing a narrative. It is either from ignorance or intentional. But it is 100% a leftist talking point meant to trick idiots like yourself into blindly repeating it.

            So you make a knowingly false claim to attack trump, someone gives you the factual information showing you to be intentionally pushing a lie, and instead of admitting you were unaware you attack.

            Hilarious. And bookmarked.

            1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

              Blah blah blah blah.

              And bookmarked.

              Loser.

    3. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      It’s gonna be epic when he wins again.

      1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

        If he loses the next insurrection will bring guns.

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          T.D.S.

          1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

            Yes. Trump's Deranged Supporters will be in attendance.

      2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

        I look forward to the screaming. It will be absolutely hilarious. I may have to wear Depends for a week, because I'm going to be pointing and laughing at people so hard I might pee.

  42. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    The "law" has become lawless.

    Special Counsel Jack Smith sought Twitter data on "all lists of Twitter users who have favorited or retweeted tweets posted by [Trump]''...

    DOJ Ordered Sweep of Trump’s Twitter Data for Everyone Who ‘Liked, Followed or Retweeted’ Trump.

    The release of the warrant follows Twitter opposing the search warrant as well as an accompanying gag order—arguing that the gag order violated the company’s First Amendment right to communicate with Trump, and that Trump may have legal standing to raise his executive-privilege rights to block the warrant.

    Twitter was ultimately unsuccessful in its opposition to the DOJ, with Obama-appointed District Judge Beryl Howell also fining the company $350,000 in February for failing to meet a deadline for complying with the warrant.

    An appeals court upheld all of Howell’s decisions.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      The DOJ has released the redacted search warrant for Donald Trump's Twitter account.

      Unredacted pages here:

      [documents]

      1. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

        What's the judge's story? Isn't she a FISA judge, too?

  43. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Professor at @RutgersU went on MSNBC and suggested Elon is antisemitic and hates Jews after he visited Israel and toured the massacre site with Netanyahu.

    Joy Reid nods along.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      Noura Erakat's another Palestinian subversive whose only loyalty is to Palestine, not the country where she's actually a citizen.

      1. Nardz   2 years ago

        Lot of that kinda thing going around...

  44. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago

    Huh.

    https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4331790-elon-musk-deletes-pizzagate-meme/

    So Elon Musk promotes then deletes a PizzaGate meme, he retweets Nazi content then has to backtrack - can we call him an overgrown child?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Tell us about bears in trunks again?

    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

      It's like he has never read any of the stupid QAnon shit conservatives like to spew until this year.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        Please, for the sake of the commentariat, explain why you have a "2" after your name.

      2. Sevo   2 years ago

        turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
        turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    3. Agammamon   2 years ago

      You can call him whatever you want - but the 'elite' of our country have a disturbing track record of kiddy-diddling.

    4. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

      “he retweets Nazi content then has to backtrack”

      What made the content “Nazi”, Lying Jeffy? (although if anyone knows Nazi content…)

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

        Pizza is round, round like the "O" in the O-K hand gesture.

        1. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

          And the three fingers look like a turkey tail. So, Turkey Pizza is the most racist food possible.

    5. Zeb   2 years ago

      Yeah, what was the Nazi content?

      And doesn't it seem a little suspicious? I don't see how you read his comment as an endorsement of the whole Q anon conspiracy theory, whatever it is. Seems fair to say that it does seem a little odd that several supposed debunkers of the theory are actual pedophiles.

  45. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Republicans don't want Hunter Biden to testify publicly because truth is scary
    Does Hunter Biden have any idea how hard it is to manipulate and distort facts when you let the person you're trying to impugn share actual information that might undermine your misinformation?

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/11/29/hunter-biden-testify-james-comer-impeachment/71730568007/

    Republicans want to discuss HUNTER BIDENS PENIS! in private without TV cameras and the lamestream media reporting facts.

    1. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

      What they are afraid of is his balls. That he has a pair which more than you can say for Jim Jordan and the Republicans that refused to testify about what happened on January 6th.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        What they are afraid of is his balls.

        Most think they prefer his penis.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Please, for the sake of the commentariat, explain why you have a “2” after your name.

        2. Sevo   2 years ago

          The assclown turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        What they are afraid of is his balls.

        LOL, no one is afraid of Hunter's entitled attitude from knowing he never has to suffer the consequences of his shitty, deviant behavior.

        His daddy and stepmom are pretty fucking afraid of his youngest daughter, though.

      3. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Parody.

        1. Dakotian   2 years ago

          Parody or just really really dumb. Parody should be at least a little clever.

          1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

            "Parody should be at least a little clever." Well, that puts the kibosh on my theory that The Rev is parody.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      I see the ActBlue talking points memo just came out.

      Rex Huppke is quite the flaming progtard, having read his screeds in the Chicago Tribune for years. His columns are a very lame attempt at humor, and get very tiresome after the first one that you've read.

      Try harder, dork.

    3. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

      If Hunter Biden testifies publicly, it could damage GOP narrative
      We believe deeply in transparency, but not the kind of transparency that could allow people to see things. Under the direction of Rep. James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, we have worked hard on our narrative and gone to great lengths to sidestep irritating left-wing speed bumps like “facts” and “evidence.” The last thing we, as a party, should accept right now is an effort by Hunter Biden to directly answer questions and defend himself.

      Well done, you lamestream media pedophile WEF globalist Marxist.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        Geeze, you're even dumber than I first thought. Huppke claims to be a humor columnist. The only humor he knows is bad humor.

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

          DERP! SHELL COMPANY! ARGLE BARGLE! ARRGGHHH!!! BENGHAZI!!!!!

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Throw in some random mixed case there, Pluggo, you don't seem quite deranged enough.

          2. Sevo   2 years ago

            The TDS-addled assclown turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
            turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

          3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 years ago

            Screaming Benghazi as part of your schtick is pretty low, considering 4 people were killed and another guy almost lost an arm.

            1. Sevo   2 years ago

              Oh, turd is much, much lower than that.

            2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

              We call that the Rittenhouse award

    4. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

      Hunter Biden will comply with the subpoena, or he will be prosecuted. It is that simple. No one is above the law, right? Where have I heard that line before?

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        It's different when Democrats like Pluggo say it. There's nUaNcEs.

      2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 years ago (edited)

        Who is going to prosecute him? Trump defied all sorts of Congressional subpoenas when he was in charge, and got away with it. Why shouldn’t Hunter Biden just ignore this subpoena?

        I'm not advocating that he should or he shouldn't. Just, if you were in his shoes, why wouldn't you?

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          What were those "subpoenas" for, Lying Jeffy?

          Yes, I do know, but I want you to say it.

      3. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

        But Hunter Biden is complying and offering to testify. Which is more than many Republicans will do. Do you think you could get a court to prosecute Hunter for noncompliance, because he will not testify in private? I don't think that will happen.

    5. Sevo   2 years ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    6. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

      Hey another lie from shrike. Public testimony in congress comes with rules and time limits that allow a defendant to filibuster the testimony. The trasncripted interview does not. The GOP stated he can request a public hearing after the transcribed interview.

      Why is everything you say a leftist lie?

      1. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

        This is of course BS. Hillary Clinton several times about Benghazi and in one case for 11 hours. There are no fixed rules for public testimony and the chairman could set the rules he likes. What he can't do in public is lie about what Hunter said.

        1. Jefferson Paul   2 years ago

          So if it were a private transcripted interview, instead of a public hearing, you are alleging that the transcript would be altered and faked?

          1. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

            No, the transcript would be correct. What I am saying, and this has been done is that the Republicans would claim something from the interview that would later be shown to be false. By the time it is reported correctly the story has been seeded in the public's mind.

  46. DRM   2 years ago

    Um, Liz?

    But last week, for reasons that are unclear, New Zealand's parliament started to reverse that law

    There's nothing particularly unclear about it. There was an election; the people who passed the ban lost, and the people who opposed the ban won.

    Yes, the NYT is accurate in reporting that three-party coalition agreement that announced the change did not itself explicitly put forth a justification. But that is largely inherent in the nature of multi-party coalition agreements; it is unlikely that all the negotiators have the same reasons for the position.

  47. Jerry B.   2 years ago

    "Substack has a Nazi problem,"

    According to the more Leftist Washington Post commentariat, the Washington Post has a Nazi problem.

    I guess when someone doesn't agree with your biases 100%, they're Nazis.

    "We're all Nazis now!!!"

  48. Sevo   2 years ago

    Thank you, Donald Trump:

    "Ninth Circuit Judge Plans To Leave The Bench, Return To Private Practice"
    https://abovethelaw.com/2023/01/watford-resign-court-private-practice/

    According to an interview in The Chron this morning, he's leaving as a result of SCOTUS rulings. Not that they are constitutionally wrong, they're not sufficiently left wing for his tastes.
    Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out, scumbag.

  49. Agammamon   2 years ago

    "But last week, for reasons that are unclear, New Zealand's parliament started to reverse that law in a huge win for smoker freedom."

    The reasons aren't unclear - the new New Zealand parliament is actually kinda pro-New Zealand and New Zealand's autonomy. They've been asking whether or not treaties are 'in the national interest' - for example the UN's stealth takeover of global healthcare, they're rejecting it.

    This is just part and parcel of a parliament that is working to undo the horrible things its predecessor has done.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      They got rid of that dizzy chick that was in charge.

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

        Sadly, not by drowning.

  50. Agammamon   2 years ago

    " Not really. Substack allows writers to self-publish."

    Exactly. They don't follow the narrative - hence why they're all Nazis. Get with the times Wolfe.

  51. Agammamon   2 years ago

    "The vast majority of that which receives eyeballs on Substack is…excellent and decidedly non-Third-Reich-supporting."

    Better a thousand innocent be silenced than one Nazi be allowed to speak.

  52. Minadin   2 years ago

    Would 'Edgelords & Hotheads' be a good Reason Commentariat band name?

    1. Ajsloss   2 years ago

      Has "Fist-ful of Nardz" already been taken?

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

        *snerk!*

      2. Agammamon   2 years ago

        That'll be the title of the breakout album.

        1. Minadin   2 years ago

          Perfect.

  53. swillfredo pareto   2 years ago

    Please, nobody Sioux over this blackface/Kansas City Chiefs kerfuffle

    This is Nick Sandmann Part II. Expect zero contrition from the scumbags currently in high dudgeon once it is shown how categorically wrong they are. Their work is done.

    A Lie Is Halfway Round the World Before the Truth Has Got Its Boots On.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago (edited)

      Perhaps a soothing knee massage to the neck and upper back would calm Carron Phillips down.

  54. JFree   2 years ago (edited)

    Varadkar’s administration has been disturbingly quiet on what type of hate speech would actually warrant prison time.

    What the gobshite kind of a Mick name is Varadkar?

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Ireland is no longer Irish.

      1. swillfredo pareto   2 years ago

        Ireland is no longer Irish.

        Sir Paul has an idea: Give Ireland Back to the Irish.

        1. Chumby   2 years ago

          Seamus if we don’t accomplish this.
          - folks supporting that movement

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      Vradakar's dad is Indian.

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      Ireland got enriched by people who like hate speech laws.

      1. Zeb   2 years ago

        Seems to me that it is mostly the white elites who like hate speech laws.

  55. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    Classic government logic: Since banning something creates black markets, they will instead…allow a vice, yet tax it quite heavily, which—checks notes—surely avoids that whole black market problem.

    You know who else often has to check notes while writing comments?

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

      Did think of you when I read that.

      1. Minadin   2 years ago

        Same.

  56. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    "Substack has a Nazi problem," declares The Atlantic. Not really. Substack allows writers to self-publish. The vast majority of that which receives eyeballs on Substack is…excellent and decidedly non-Third-Reich-supporting.

    What everyone NEEDS to do is realize that this whole game isn't about whether or not Substack has a Nazi problem, it's the fact that the Atlantic, and every other corporate media operation has an eyeballs problem.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      And that there's a distinct lack of "censoring anything that refutes the left-liberal consensus" problem.

      1. Zeb   2 years ago

        Which is the fucking point of Substack, or one of the big ones anyway. So it isn't a problem. When you say you will allow free speech, and then you do allow free speech, you aren't the one with a problem.
        I think Paul is right and the Atlantic mostly wants to beat up on the competition. But it's striking to me how many people and orgs have given up on any pretense of supporting free speech generally.

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

          "You are free to say the things I tell you to say."

  57. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    "At the forthcoming UN climate talks, diplomats will push for a tripling of renewable power by 2030," reports Yale Environment 360. "A new analysis finds the world is likely already on track to hit this goal."

    I suspect a lot of agreeing to disagree went on here.

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago

      The UN and WEF accidentally forced China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia to accidentally oppose their "Live in pods. Eat bugs. Own noting. Be content." agenda.

  58. Use the Schwartz   2 years ago

    Thoughts Re: Atlantic Substack Article:

    1. Is the Atlantic calling out anti-Semitic articles on Substack because they are fer it, or agin' it? See it's hard to tell with the Left these days...

    2. The Atlantic sees Substack as a threat, just like they see Facebook, Instagram, and (choke) TikTok as a threat.

    3. You have to search for this stuff on Substack, so it's like typing "porn" into Google and freaking out over the results.

    1. NOYB2   2 years ago

      Why would Substack be a "threat"? It's not like the Atlantic is a business. The Atlantic is the pet project of the angry billionaire who put out for Steve Jobs in return for a juicy inheritance.

  59. LIBertrans   2 years ago

    Lizard clearly misses the olde Ireland, where Constitutional Comstockism and Islamic girl-bullying kept pagan females in their place. That's the thing about women voters. They rarely spend a lot of effort on pal-ing up to the likes of Marjorie Greene-Teeth and the Alabama von Mises.

  60. AT   2 years ago

    Having lots of small donors allows us to maintain a wonderfully high degree of editorial independence.

    Does it though?

    1. Minadin   2 years ago

      Spreading out your funding among people who are only sort of loosely aligned by terminology, but actually disagree on a lot of the specifics, and have a particular affinity to bicker on details? Yeah, that gives you a lot of cover and leeway.

  61. NOYB2   2 years ago

    Though I am in favor of doling out punishment to those who commit property crimes, bolstering the capabilities of the surveillance state seems like a bad road to go down.

    The EU is the Fourth Reich, under German leadership. Why wouldn't they go down this road? Europeans voted for this, now let them enjoy it.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!