Texas Troopers Killed 74 People in Vehicle Chases Since Implementing Controversial Border Program
From March 2021 to July 2023, 74 people were killed and nearly 200 were injured in vehicle chases occurring in counties affected by Operation Lone Star.

Texas border enforcement cops killed 74 people and wounded almost 200 more during vehicle chases over a 29-month period, according to a report released yesterday by Human Rights Watch. The chases occurred as part of Operation Lone Star, a controversial program that has spent over $10 billion in taxpayer funds to militarize Texas' border with Mexico.
Operation Lone Star (OLS), which was launched in March 2021 by Gov. Greg Abbot, has devoted a tremendous amount of taxpayer dollars to increasing Texas' border security, often using extreme tactics. Recently the program came under fire for using razor wire and blade-topped buoys on the Rio Grande in an attempt to keep out migrants.
The goal of the effort, according to a July press release, is to "secure the border; stop the smuggling of drugs, weapons, and people into Texas; and prevent, detect, and interdict transnational criminal behavior between ports of entry." According to Human Rights Watch, as of March 2022, about one-third of the total Texas state police force had been deployed as part of OLS, with additional National Guard members from 14 other states joining the project.
"Across the United States, police departments have adopted restrictions on when law enforcement can engage in a vehicle pursuit," the report reads, adding that the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) "has not restricted vehicle pursuits….Texas DPS and several other law enforcement agencies have engaged in dangerous and deadly pursuits on a weekly basis in the 60 counties implementing OLS or experiencing DPS deployments under OLS."
According to the report, Texas Department of Public Safety troopers working under Operation Lone Star frequently engage in unnecessary vehicle chases and other dangerous driving maneuvers when attempting to make arrests. As a result, unnecessary police chases have increased by as much as 1,000 percent in some Texas counties.
Data analyzed by Human Rights Watch showed that over 80 percent of cases were instigated because of a traffic violation, with 97 percent of these violations being misdemeanors like speeding. According to the report, OLS chases had an average maximum speed of 91 miles per hour, with one in three reaching speeds of over 100 miles per hour.
In all, from March 2021 to July 2023, 74 drivers, passengers, or bystanders were killed in these chases, and 189 more were wounded. Those killed include seven bystanders, including a 7-year-old girl and her 71-year-old grandmother.
"Texans want our government to show us it can do its job, but Operation Lone Star and these dangerous and deadly car chases are bringing a sense of chaos and lack of humanity to my neighborhood and to my state," Amerika Garcia Grewal, a resident of Eagle Pass, Texas, and member of Eagle Pass Border Coalition, told Human Rights Watch. "I want Texas law enforcement to stop killing people and I want Operation Lone Star to end. This is not the kind of government my community needs."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
…blade-topped buoys on the Rio Grande
There are no sharp edges on the buoys.
Yeah buoy!
I caught that too, right after I saw them say cops were somehow killing people by chasing them when they broke the law.
In addition to mischaracterizing WHO is responsible for the deaths, they lie by omission about the number of deaths relative to anything resembling a rational standard. 74 deaths over 29 months over multiple counties makes the number of people killed in crashes resulting from teens stealing Kia and Hundai cars look like 911 in comparison.
It is to keep the vampires out.
I'm in favor of seeding the river with alligators.
ASAP please.
I hope ESPN has them ranked first.
But were those people citizens, or illegals?
At this moment, I can't really say I care. Regardless of legal residency, these people are committing crimes and causing death and damage in the process of avoiding responsibility. It isn't the fault of the police that criminals are causing harm.
On the flip side, is it responsible for the police to just ignore crime because attempting to stop a suspect could cause harm? I don't like the precedent set there and think it's bs progressive logic that destroys society
NO amount of damage to the USA, and NO numbers of innocents maimed or killed, can EVER be TOO MUCH, when it comes to HATING-HATING-HATING the illegal sub-human brown-skins, dammit!!!!
Not allowing illegal invasion is just 'hating-hating-hating'...... /s
Your self-entitled criminal BS is getting old.
At this moment, I can't really say I care whether you care or not and whether you live or die because you're an execrable piece of slime.
They did mention "bystanders".
Cops are killing bystanders by chasing criminals who kill bystanders while running from the cops. If a cop says hey stop you criminal and the criminal murders a bystander that's actually a cop killing a bystander. Seems logical to me!
"these people are committing crimes and causing death and damage in the process of avoiding responsibility"
^Exactly.
There are many instances where the pursuit is canceled.
At least 8 were innocent victims. Here are some of the details:
The driver of a Honda containing smuggled illegals passed an 18-wheeler in a no-passing zone on U.S. 57 Highway near Batesville and drove head-on into a Chevy SUV, killing the driver and a passenger, according to the spokesman, Lt. Chris Olivarez. They were later identified as Jose Lerma, 67, and Isabel Lerma, 65, of Dalton, Georgia.
The casualties of the ill-fated pursuits have included drivers and passengers of involved vehicles, according to the report, but also innocent bystanders, in one case a 7-year-old girl who was struck by a fleeing truck driven by a Louisiana resident.
Two civilians are confirmed dead after an alleged human smuggler transporting illegal migrants collided with their vehicle. The victims were killed Saturday in Mission, Texas, after a human smuggler, being pursued by police, ran a stop sign and T-boned their vehicle, according to the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS).
So the coyote caused the death... yet you blame the police. Sounds like the facts don't matter to you.
Some criminals did some VERY WRONG things in Nebraska! (I heard that they scratched their butts during the National Anthem!) Let us therefor NUKE Nebraska! Nuke ’em till they GLOW!!! PUNISHMENT is THE Final Solution, ALWAYS and FOREVER!
If some innocent people happen to SUFFER during the nuking of Nebraska? Shit is ALL to be blamed on the CRIMINALS in Nebraska!
(All who disagree with MEEEE, are weak-spine limp-dicks and leftist WUSSIES!!!!)
JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer, ye are SUCH an UDDERLY evil piece of fascist SHIT!!!!
+10000 Right... Blame projection 101.
So you're saying Texas police didn't kill 74 people? It was the smugglers that did? Maybe Emma should correct the headline.
Crappy driving by the coyotes probably killed most of them. I also like the “X number of people were wounded” rather than “injured”. Nice spin.
The criminals caused these deaths – not the chase, the running away from the cops.
There's plenty of shit to hold cops responsible for, what criminals do to others in an attempt to escape is not one of those things. We've seen what happens when cops are forbidden to chase, to arrest, and when what they do arrest is let back out immediately.
Everything is a tradeoff and the latter is way more harmful than the former.
"Texas border enforcement cops killed 74 people and wounded almost 200 more during vehicle chases over a 29-month period"
Well, according to "Human Rights Watch" (as trustworthy as the NYT & WaPo).
In reality those deaths and injuries (not wounds) are due to those avoiding arrest. We pay the cops to chase and arrest the bad guys.
I wonder what the arrest/kill ratio is.
And you'd never guess who funds Human Rights Watch. It's none other than the Open Society Foundation aka George and Alex Soros along with Bill Gates.
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/human-rights-watch/
Alex is as dumb as his dad. Tried claiming progressive cities had less murder than republican cities this morning. The community note was precious.
I think everyone knows that Salt Lake City is a cesspool of murder compared to Chicago.
That says it all.
Anything with either George Soros or Bill Gates involved is highly suspect.
From the incident reports it was the smugglers trying to evade arrest that caused the deaths. Narrative building at its finest.
Sooooo...... What's the mpg rating of a car that can run for a 21 month period?
Can you give us a breakdown of each particular chase, the circumstances and conditions? Or are we just going to take Hamas' word for what's going on?
Free thinker Kim Iverson just ran with “The highest civilian death rate ever” in regards to Gaza. The Israelis are *that* imperialist and colonialist and white adjacent.
Including back when standard warfare included sieges, scorched earth retreats, and mongols….Israel is that evil.
All good as long as the goal is to stop migrants.
Xenophobia uber Alles!!! Heil Hatred!
The smugglers caused the deaths. You blame the police.
Ashley Babbitt shot by cops, you blame the protestors.
Talk about principled.
The only one passing judgment here is you.
You remain not smart.
You like it when brown migrants are killed, and you get mad when a black guard kills a white trespasser. The pattern is obvious.
Nobody was trespassing the "People's House". Especially during a peaceful protest.
And you.
We (theoretically) have control over police, but not criminals. When police and criminals engage in high speed chases they endanger innocent bystanders. Our only recourse to end the chase and protect innocents lies with the police. For this reason it is justifiable to blame the police; because they are the only ones accountable to us (again, theoretically). Some violent criminals are worth the risk of high speed chases. I don’t think illegal aliens crossing the border is. There are safer and more effective ways to crack down on illegal aliens if that is your goal.
This is a fun game.
We theoretically choose the president. When the president promotes lax border Laws it causes smugglers and criminals to transport humans. Biden is to blame.
This is fun when you advocate for no agency of others and seek to blame someone else.
Should I extend it one more level to blame open border advocates?
By your assertions we can also blame cops who don't arrest illegal immigrants that later go on to kill or maim a human. Same rationale. Guess the only thing to do is always blame someone besides the individuals who caused the harm.
I didn't mean to imply the criminals are blameless, just that the police answer to us, the criminals don't.
Yes, the same applies to many situations including Biden. There is the matter of relative risk though. If you are chasing someone at 100 mph, what are the chances they will kill/harm someone? If you let an illegal alien go at a routine police interaction, what are the chances they will kill/harm someone?
If someone is willing to drive over 100 mph on a public road, they are most likely a danger to everyone in other ways.
They were willing to do the original crime, they were willing to drive recklessly, they will be willing to kill intentionally.
Interesting statistic you pulled out of your ass there.
Have you ever worked with livestock? The calmest cow or even chicken will often charge if cornered. Similar instinct with humans. Fight or flight kicks in. Not to mention that many that flee are teens/early 20's males that will mature out of it.
By the way, chickens can use your head as a springboard to escape. As for charging cattle, they can teach their own lesson about when to call off a pursuit and try a different tactic due to excessive risk.
How much has crime risen, such as shoplifting, in states that no longer prosecute shop lifting? Letting criminals go doesn't stop future crime, it in fact encourages more crime.
Yes, obviously. There are tradeoffs.
But, I'm not advocating not prosecuting these crimes. I'm advocating using smarter, safer apprehension techniques as opposed to high speed chases whenever possible and that some pursuits are more dangerous than they're worth even if no alternative technique is available.
One of the worse case scenarios occured in Florida acouple years ago when some Kia Boys went on a car theft rampage and stole a couple SUVs driving down the streets at speeds up to 90 mPH. After the police broke off pursuit, the one vehicle continued speeding, that is until they struck a car stopped at an intersection, whereby said speeding car became airborne, striking a utility pole at 12 feet up, ejecting three of the four young Einsteins leaving only one survivor.
Yas, it be all de fault of dose whi rayciss popo.
A .50-cal round through the engine block (or drivers-side windshield) from a sharpshooter on the next overpass works wonders.
Then you have an out-of-control car going 100 mph careening down the highway. Brilliant!
Chemjeff run-of-the-mill collectivist doesn't know how cars work. Go figure.
Zero culpability for the fleeing criminals I see.
There should be a no-chase policy, as long as they're on the highway to Chicago and New York.
Let's not leave out Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, Portland, and Seattle.
Martha's vineyard is offering free pizza!
And a free ride to an ICE facility.
With military escort!
You forgot Little Somalia aka Minneapolis.
There should be a no-chase policy, as long as they’re on the highway to Chicago and New York.
Detroit apparently has a no-chase policy. Warren has a "chase-them-back-into-Detroit" policy.
Some criminals did some VERY WRONG things in Nebraska! (I heard that they scratched their butts during the National Anthem!) Let us therefor NUKE Nebraska! Nuke ’em till they GLOW!!! PUNISHMENT is THE Final Solution, ALWAYS and FOREVER!
If some innocent people happen to SUFFER during the nuking of Nebraska? Shit is ALL to be blamed on the CRIMINALS in Nebraska!
(All who disagree with MEEEE, are weak-spine limp-dicks and leftist WUSSIES!!!!)
Shouldn't the crime itself be taken into account? I mean, is it really worth risking the death of drivers, passengers and bystanders over a traffic citation?
I've been waiting decades for people to realize this. For nonviolent crimes, get the license # and deal with it later or radio ahead for a roadblock/ tire spikes. Yes, some will get away with crimes like drunk driving or drugs in the car, but lives will be saved.
get the license # and deal with it later or radio ahead for a roadblock/ tire spikes.
You should watch some police videos where roadblocks and spikes are deployed and see just how often those fail.
I have watched many such videos. I've also watched many videos where a police chase ends in death and injury of innocents. Which is a worse outcome for a speeder, a shoplifter, a drug dealer?
We get it, no consequences for criminals if they can just dial up the risk to others above zero. Pathetic proggy response of blame shifting.
No need for hyperbole. That's not what I said. The risk is always above zero. But some things are excessively risky and we need to draw lines. We allow people to drive, but not drive drunk.
I remember my dad telling me the respect he had for his retired state trooper friend said that he learned through his career to not pursue petty criminals if they fled due to the excessive risk. The prompt for my dad to say this was the death of 3 local teens that were chased to a fatal accident for speeding (likely drunk).
How do you get a car ahead to lay down spikes if you don't chase? Otherwise you don't know where the suspect vehicle is going.
Don't tell me you've been waiting decades for people to realize this - but you never thought it through?
>Yes, some will get away with crimes like drunk driving or drugs in the car, but lives will be saved.
Except for the people the drunk driver and the drug dealer then go on to murder.
It is done all the time. Police turn off the lights and trail farther behind. They radio others with the vehicle description. Unmarked cars and helicopters are a big help.
Except for the people the drunk driver and the drug dealer then go on to murder.
Were you the instructor for my DARE classes? It's risk analysis. Those risks are much smaller than the a death as the result of the chase.
Sure. If you take responsibility for those killed by illegal immigrants who the cops let go.
Start with these. Apologize for every one.
https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/crimes-illegal-immigrants-widespread-across-us-sanctuaries-shouldnt
So maybe Jesse is finally learning about the concept of cost/benefit analysis?
If you let the illegals go free, some will commit crimes and harm innocent people.
If you pursue an aggressive strategy to catch the illegals, there will be 'collateral damage' which will end up with innocent people being harmed and killed.
Both statements are true.
So, whatcha gonna do Jesse?
And if the illegals pull over they’re likely processed and released in a matter of hours, and then they don’t have to worry about being chased. And they know this. Instead they run and kill people, sometimes themselves.
But fuckin’ cops, right Jeff?
And if the illegals pull over they’re likely processed and released in a matter of hours, and then they don’t have to worry about being chased. And they know this. Instead they run and kill people, sometimes themselves.
Your argument makes no sense. If the illegals know that if they are caught that they will be processed and released in just a few hours, why would they continue to risk their own lives by continuing to flee?
Let me guess, because they are inherently horrible people from shithole countries?
Yes, we've done the cost-benefit analysis.
And what are we going to do?
We're going to have the cops take the least damaging option - to chase those who flee.
Until the chase turns into a pursuit of 100+ mph. Those are really dangerous speeds. Then what? Call it off or keep going? How far are you willing to go to get those dirty filthy illegals?
Oh wait, aren't you one of those people who think that the military should be shooting penniless Guatemalans at the border? Never mind then.
He doesn't care when brown people are killed.
But when a black guard kills a white trespasser he has kittens.
No no no. When a black guard kills a white "Capitol tourist peacefully protesting", that is when he has kittens.
The black guard can kill as many white BLM protestors aka ANTI-AMERICAN SCUM as the guard wants, though.
"A recent report from the Texas Department of Public Safety revealed that 297,000 non-citizens had been “booked into local Texas jails between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019.” So these are non-citizens who allegedly committed local crimes, not immigration violations."
74/29-months = 2.5/m
297,000/98-months = 3,030/m
That's 0.0008% or 1 per 1,250 crimes.
I just don't get the excuses to allow a low threshold of criminal acceptance. Taking away agency from criminals is not libertarian.
Oh give it a rest. Nobody is buying your schtick of "unless you agree with me you want criminals to walk free" crapola.
If we had 100% strict and unyielding enforcement of all laws, we would be living in a panopticon police state, and no one here wants that. Well maybe Nardz would, but only if he were in charge.
So if we don't want a police state, that means we have to make some tradeoffs. We have to tolerate that some minor offenses will not be prosecuted, and the benefit that we gain from that is that we retain our liberties - we don't suffer under an oppressive regime that would be necessary to prosecute every last minor offense.
Obviously there comes a point where we cannot tolerate too much criminal behavior, because otherwise the liberty we lose from all of the NAP violations from the criminal activity outweighs the liberty we retain from not having the police state enforcement.
Rational people understand this, but demagogues and partisans like you do not. You'll just dishonestly push one side of the cost/benefit analysis and claim that it is the only side that matters and that the other side of the cost/benefit analysis is irrelevant. So you and your team continually exaggerate the loss of liberty and the physical/monetary costs associated with criminal behavior because that is how your team derives its political power - by scaring people into thinking "crime is out of control!" and so they will vote for your team to put the criminals in their place.
Of course the other team does the same thing - they exaggerate and inflate the loss of liberty associated with policing, so that they can scare people into thinking "the police are coming to gun you down in the street for no reason!" and so they expect people will vote for their team to put the cops in their place. That's also dishonest.
Reasonable and rational people will understand that there must be a balance here, and libertarians of reason must keep the liberty of the individual in the forefront of thought when striking that balance.
You consider things like human trafficking to be minor crimes? I was pulled once for speeding. I had no reason not to stop. Why do you think people evade police in reckless manner?
Cost benefits analysis requires intellectual honesty and willingness to consider if ideas that work on papers are feasible in practice. It doesn’t involve counting immediate 1 gain while ignoring 3 losses, which is what you’re doing.
Most of CA thought like Chemjeff and said “It’s not worth seriously prosecuting people for stealing items that total less than 900 USD”. They voted for prog DAs. The unintended consequences? Massive retail theft and unrest in cities like SF. CA made some progress (maybe) in prison overcrowding but created deeper problems elsewhere.
Your position (apparently) is that cops should just let speeding people go to spare lives, even if they’re suspected of transporting migrants, drugs, weapons, etc. At a time when there are two wars and Jewish lives are in danger.
Most Americans will consider this an extremist position and reject it. It’s reasonable to stop pursuits if road conditions are genuinely compromised (bad weather, traffic) and civilian life is demonstrably at risk. But once someone goes 90 plus MPH, pursuits are usually called for. HRC won’t hype numbers of deaths caused by coyotes, who often abandon their “customers”.
You do, in fact, take extremist positions – like open borders. A country does not have infinite resources to feed and house millions of foreign nationals. Eric Adams is decrying the migrant situation in his city and has threatened cuts to city services. Even black Chicagoans are so fed up that they’re pledging to vote republican.
I’ve never once seen you credit any other viewpoint other than yours. I told you I’m an immigrant and given you certain realities that belie the usual narrative, and you’ve ignored them completely. Open your own mind first before urging others to do so.
It would also help to understand the statistic if we knew what the rate was in the previous 29 months. I mean if there were 65 in the previous 29 months is an increase of 9 statistically significant? I noticed that the article's author didn't include that number as if they didn't want that comparison.
Just to add it would also have helped to know what the number of deaths were of those who were fleeing and lost control of the vehicle thus crashing into a brick wall or some other unforgiving object.
The person who fled from the traffic citation certainly thought so.
The cops do not know why the driver is running from them - and even if it is only a traffic violation, someone stupid enough to run from the cops over a traffic ticket is a menace to the public safety.
Of course if the federal government enforced existing immigration law Texas wouldn't have to defend it's borders. And if the human smugglers pulled over instead of trying to outrun the cops a lot of the death and Injuries would not happen. A lot of cops are assholes who shouldn't be behind the wheel and if innocent bystanders are in harms way the Texas legislature should consider regulating pursuits. But that's a separate issue.
unnecessary police chases
Why were they unnecessary?
If the criminal suspects don’t stop, a chase becomes necessary TO stop them.
The question then is it worth the risk to others to chase the criminals?
Why not just catch them later?
Because they’ll dump the vehicle and the “migrants” will disappear into the undocumented alien demimonde. Then the coyote will cross back into Mexico and do it again. At probably ten grand a pop, replacing a junker car or van is just the cost of doing business.
Is it worth the risk to human life?
Ask the coyote.
Yes. We are at war.
How would they know until they detain the suspects to find out why they fled an attempted police stop?
How can you "catch them later" if you don't know the identity of the vehicles occupants?
How do you catch someone later when they don't live where their vehicle's registration says they live?
Even if you do go to the house, how do you prove that that person was the one driving?
And the smugglers now know cops will stop pursuing if they raise the population risk above zero, so what is to stop then from threatening neighbors or getting in a car to flee again when approached?
And chasing shoplifters can also injure people, so we should stop that, right? In fact, all attempts to enforce any laws pose too much risk, so just stop trying.
Libertarian paradise!
+1000000000 Perfectly stated.
Well, at that extreme, the cops also would not chase citizens who successfully defend themselves. Pretty soon the crooks would figure out the new rules and get a job.
A few shoplifter heads on pikes outside a few stores would slow the crime rate a bit.
This coming Friday will be another Black Friday sale. Entitled the George Floyd Black Friday sale where everything is 100% off.
Besides deys law be all rayciss and sheeit.
An it not be all shopliffin but reparations an sheeit.
The left-leaner in a nutshell.
"If it keeps me from getting something that isn't mine I'm an anarchist. If it helps me get something that isn't mine it's just good government."
"From March 2021 to July 2023, 74 people were killed and nearly 200 were injured in vehicle chases occurring in counties affected by Operation Lone Star."
That happens, sometimes, when you're caught breaking the law and try to flee.
" often using extreme tactics. Recently the program came under fire for using razor wire and blade-topped buoys on the Rio Grande in an attempt to keep out migrants."
We have very different definitions of 'extreme'.
To you, 'extreme' is 'anything'.
To me its 'taking people's land for a border wall' or 'shooting people trying to cross the river.
""Across the United States, police departments have adopted restrictions on when law enforcement can engage in a vehicle pursuit," "
If by 'across the United States' you mean 'in Democrat controlled cities that are shitholes' - sure.
But most of the US hasn't implemented anything of the sort.
Also, I'm not sure how 'across the United States' is even an argument.
The *point* of the way we're organized is so that different places can do different things - we're not all supposed to follow the same policies unless and until those policies show themselves as objectively better.
Democrat controlled cities are beyond saving. They voted for it now they're getting it good and hard.
The problem is the liberals are too stupid to realize the policies they enacted are the reasons why their cities have turned into toilets.
"According to the report, Texas Department of Public Safety troopers working under Operation Lone Star frequently engage in unnecessary vehicle chases and other dangerous driving maneuvers when attempting to make arrests. As a result, unnecessary police chases have increased by as much as 1,000 percent in some Texas counties."
Who is defining 'unneccessary'?
What is their definition of 'necessary'?
There's just a lot of questions this article raise that are *not* answered by these out-of-context excerpts from this 'report'.
"According to the report, OLS chases had an average maximum speed of 91 miles per hour, with one in three reaching speeds of over 100 miles per hour."
Is this bad? I don't know. I routinely used to reach speeds of 90+ MPH on highways. Most of the cities you'll find the average speed on the highways running through them are in the 80's. I remember screaming down some CT highways in bumper-to-bumper traffic, right next to Jersey barricades, at fucking 75+. Those people are insane. Fucking terrifying. Yet no one hit anything.
"Data analyzed by Human Rights Watch showed that over 80 percent of cases were instigated because of a traffic violation, with 97 percent of these violations being misdemeanors like speeding."
If all you're getting is a speeding ticket - I bet those people are not the ones screaming away at 90+.
The speeding that got the cop's attention in the first place - and speeding unlike, say, a busted tail light, is a legitimate (if frustrating) reason to stop someone - was probably being done by somene wanted on something more serious. Hence why they ran.
Or it was being done by someone so dangerously reckless its necessary to stop them before they kill others. Hence why they ran.
So, it's your position that any excuse is a good excuse for the police state to project their power and authority over us serfs? Probable cause and due process are just window dressing concepts in the Constitution that the police should just ignore in their pursuit of order? It doesn't matter how many innocent people are killed by panicky cops who "thought he had a gun" or "feared for my life" while doing totally unnecessary traffic stops?
Texas Troopers Killed 74 People in Vehicle Chases Since Implementing Controversial Border Program
Well, it's a start.
Hmmmm, ask yourself, "why do these people run because of a feared traffic citation"?
How about driving without a license or no insurance or both or maybe the vehicle was stolen....oh heavens, not that, or maybe they were drunk or under the influence of narcotics and other drugs or maybe they were transporting drugs or humans. Or maybe they have stolen firearms, or maybe they were gang bangers out joyriding and building up some street cred.
Our auto insurance went up by 37% because of the level of stupid behavior in cities like Detroit, Flint, Saginaw and Lansing. Uninsured, car thefts downstate force the rest of us to pay for the stupidity and criminal behavior of certain demographic.
So , please, I don't feel the least bit sorry when some criminal scum is taken out of society even if it is by a violent means.
The proper function of the police is not to keep your insurance premiums as low as possible, and the Supreme Court has ruled more than once that you have no right to expect the police to rescue you or protect you against criminal attacks. Your pathetic attempt to convince us (or yourself?) that pulling drivers over for minor traffic violations protects us all against drunk drivers is unsupported by either facts or logic. Rejected!
I think it makes a difference whether those killed were drivers, passengers or innocent bystanders! I don’t have much sympathy for drivers who flee police at high speeds. On the other hand, I do not support: routine police patrols looking for trouble (they frequently not only find trouble but create it); traffic stops for minor traffic violations (they frequently result in the death of innocent drivers at the hands of Rambo wannabes – just mail the vehicle owner a ticket and let the courts sort it out!) or community policing (the “broken window” theory is failed and ends up breaking far more windows without making communities even a little bit safer.) Police should only respond to calls about actual crimes, not welfare checks or SWATting calls.
Those are rookie numbers! Gotta pump those numbers up Texas!