Kids at Oklahoma Football Games Must Sit With Their Parents
Students in four Oklahoma school districts are also required to wear their school ID on a lanyard and sit on their own team's side.

Football season is almost over, but for the past several weeks, middle school students who attended high school games in several Oklahoma cities have had to sit with their parents at all times. At some schools, even if they go to the bathroom, they must be accompanied by an adult.
The Oklahoma schools' rules were implemented after a 16-year-old student was shot to death on August 25 at the first home game of the season for the Choctaw High School Yellowjackets.
Toward the end of the third quarter, shots rang out on the visitors' side. The victim, who was not a student at either team's school, was allegedly killed following an argument he had had with another teen. In other words, this was not what we think of as a school shooting, except that it was on school property.
In the ensuing panic, fans ran for safety and an off-duty officer shot a 42-year-old in the chest. A 15-year-old girl was also shot.
There were seven on-duty police officers at the game for security purposes, NBC reports.
The new safety rules that went into effect in at least four Oklahoma school districts include requiring all students at high school football games to wear their school ID on a lanyard. Attendees must also sit on their own team's side.
The rules at the Moore Public Schools—part of the Oklahoma City metro area—state that: "Junior High and elementary students must have a parent/guardian present for the duration of the event, and they must remain with the parent/ guardian, including [during] restroom and concession breaks."
Most purses and backpacks are forbidden, but attendees may carry a one-gallon Ziploc bag, a clear tote about the size of a sheet of paper, or a clutch no bigger than a paperback. Diaper bags are allowed, for what I assume are the obvious reasons.
Students attending Mustang Public Schools cannot mill about. "Loitering will not be tolerated," according to the rules. "Students/children are to sit in the stands and shall not congregate under the stands or in other areas of the sporting complex."
Erin Henriques—my colleague at Let Grow, the nonprofit I co-founded—tells me that these kinds of restrictions have become commonplace.
"Since I don't have kids in school anymore, I'm not sure how others feel about it," writes Henriques, who lives in Mustang, Oklahoma. "But my understanding is that everyone has gotten so used to privileges being taken away because of violence that it is just something they now have to abide by for safety, whether it is practical."
In her town, Henriques said, middle school students invited to homecoming come to the high school football games proudly wearing a corsage (on him) and a knee-length sash of matching flowers (on her). It is thrilling for them to walk through the stands together, showing off their "homecoming mums."
Now they must be accompanied by their mom or dad.
In the aftermath of a high school shooting, it's not surprising that some security changes would immediately be put in place—whether or not they do any good. But similar rules were recently adopted at Sheldon High School in Springfield, Oregon, where I can find no report of any recent incidents.
The rules there state that elementary and middle school students must be supervised by a parent or a "responsible adult" at Friday night football games.
The local ABC affiliate reports that Sheldon High School's athletic director said "the changes are to provide a safer and more predictable environment for everyone in attendance by ensuring younger fans have the guidance and support to enjoy games responsibly."
Do kids really need "guidance" at a football game? Are they not able to figure out anything by themselves?
"If I'm a 14-year-old and I have to have a parent go with me to the bathroom at a game? Talk about taking away a child's independence and instilling fear," Henriques said.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sports Illustrated writers have to be escorted by ChatGPT before they can write an article. It's the way of the world!
Actually, measures such as this provide a good leading indicator as to whether liberty will continue to flourish in this “shining city on a hill”. The school officials with authority can pass and impose any rules they want (within some limits) on school property.
Someone, once famous and esteemed, who has only been partially cancelled once said “A little rebellion is a good thing.” If the children of junior and high school age choose, they can simply refuse to attend games. If parents choose, younger junior high school and elementary students can simply not be allowed to attend or transported to games. There will be nothing school officials can do if this boycott occurs except to shrug their shoulders and declare victory.
If no such boycott materializes, that will be a pretty good indicator that our population is ready to be fully controlled.
Edit: yes, I know it's now "middle school" rather than junior high school. Some quote about a rose should come to mind for those who were in school long enough ago actually to have received some education.
What if one of the fans has on facepaint? Directly to jail?
Twitter jail for sure:
https://notthebee.com/article/this-sports-writer-is-trying-to-crucify-a-kid-for-wearing-face-paint-and-a-headdress-to-a-professional-football-game
How lucky I was to grow up in a time without such nonsense.....our school colors were orange and black, and I painted my face for games at least 2 or 3 times a year.
At the same time, with respect to Lenore’s article, the story feels too local.
Having been to a number of HS football games spanning 3 decades up to about three weeks ago, it would actually surprise me if the narrative was just “A shooting happened and then local schools adopted the parental attendance policy.” and not something like "low-level harassment and even assault routinely took place for weeks and the school was considering action until a shooting took place".
Teens fucked around all season, someone got shot and then they found out what the school was going to do about any/all such activity on their property.
They can still be mules and deliver mail-in ballots to drop boxes sans ID or parental chaperone.
It takes a village to transition a child.
Juvenile sex reassignment clinic and election fortification distribution center?
Erections matter.
Yeah,
Diaper bags are allowed, for what I assume are the obvious reasons.
Attending Presidents?
Depends
Teach them young to accept any silly old 'rule' that their masters can come up with. Otherwise they may not believe that a vaccine developed overnight and mandated by law with no recourse for 'adverse outcomes' is actually what the politicians making millions off the stock say it is.
100% safe and effective with no downsides!
They can chop off body parts at a whim, but mommy has to escort them to the non gender specific bathroom at the football game.
I seem to recall a commentary here about how parents were being helicopter parents over Trick or Treating. Here we have yet another government mandate forcing parents to helicopter their TEENAGERS.
Parents today can't take chances these days with local, county, state and federal government mandating HOW we can parent is it any wonder parent aren't ready to take risks?
So reportedly a teenager shot another teenager, therefore "an off-duty officer shot a 42-year-old in the chest"?
"A 15-year-old girl was also shot" by a different cop or the same one who shot the 42yo?
Do kids really need "guidance" at a football game? Are they not able to figure out anything by themselves?
As someone who used to doused lit matches in gasoline as a kid, I'm only ~75% sure the answer isn't "Yes".
Give it time. They're eventually going to outlaw attendance. You'll have to watch it on a screen. The NFL will let them borrow their fake cheering noise.
It is indeed disheartening to see how tragic incidents can lead to a loss of freedoms for our young students. While safety is paramount, it's essential to strike a balance between security measures and preserving the independence and normalcy of childhood experiences. The recent rules in Oklahoma and Oregon seem to reflect the heightened concerns for safety, but one cannot help but question whether such stringent measures are necessary for every student.
In times like these, it's crucial for communities to come together to find solutions that prioritize both safety and the well-rounded development of our youth. It's a delicate task to navigate, but fostering an environment where kids can enjoy football games without unnecessary restrictions is a goal worth pursuing.
The comment made by Erin Henriques regarding the impact on a 14-year-old needing a parent to accompany them to the bathroom speaks volumes. It raises valid concerns about the unintended consequences of such rules on a child's independence and the potential instillation of unnecessary fear. Let's hope that communities can collectively explore alternative ways to ensure safety while preserving the joys of childhood, even in the face of adversity.
For more information click = https://mycitycuisine.org/
I think the bots are using AI.
It's all about liability and visual perception. God forbid something happens and the School District is sued. This way if something does happen, the District can say "It isn't our fault! They violated the rules we put in place!" Then there's the whole "We have to be seen doing something." aspect. This way they can point to the helicopter parents and say "See what we are doing to keep your kids safe."
These are probably the same parents that I watch this morning when I got caught behind a school bus. It was a cold morning (16F.) I saw on at least five occasions where kids got out of a running car to get on the bus. Then the car backed up the driveway into the garage. The longest distance was 30 feet. What kid can't wait inside the door, see the bus and walk 30 feet to get on it? I could see it if it was a long driveway.
I walked two blocks to the bus stop and waited in the freezing cold for the bus - except when I biked or walked the mile and a half to school. The bus was often so late that I could get out of the cold faster by walking.
Proficiency there is 47% English, and 36% 11th grade science and 36% 11th grade math. Maybe they should just chuck the football program and use the time to educate the kids and solve the 'bathroom' problem that way? With those results maybe they are concerned the kids won't be able to find the bathroom without an adult?
> and sit on their own team's side.
No way! My girlfriend was from the opposing team's school. So I would always go there and sit with her. Sigh.
Sorry to burst Teen Brandybuck’s simping bubble, but if your girlfriend is always sitting on the visitor’s side, she’s just not that into you.
Under these rules, his girlfriend could not sit with him on his side, either.
The same problem would arise if the schools merely banned kids from neither school at the games - his team and his girlfriend's team were often playing other teams, so if they watched a game together, one of them would not be from either team's school.