Review: Ahsoka Rejects Star Wars' Good-vs.-Evil Binary
George Lucas divided his universe into light and dark. Dave Filoni is dissolving that worldview.

Since its inception in 1977, the Star Wars universe has always been divided between two poles: the light side of the Force, a mystical power embraced by the series' heroes, and the dark side, embraced by its villains. This moral-spiritual binary was explicitly literalized in the form not only of psychic powers but of the colors of the green and red laser swords—er, lightsabers—the heroes and villains fought with.
This was a universe torn between two totalizing, collective ideologies. Darkness and light, goodness and evil: the franchise's central conflict was entirely binary.
But over the last decade and a half, that schematic worldview has steadily dissolved under the oversight of Dave Filoni, the mastermind behind several animated Star Wars series as well as the live-action Star Wars: Ahsoka, which debuted on Disney+ this summer. Filoni has shaken Lucas' polarized binary, replacing it with a more nuanced view of the Force and the choice it offers.
In Ahsoka, the binary is explicitly rejected by the titular hero, who trained as a Jedi in the tradition of light but broke away from the ethos—and saw her master, Anakin Skywalker, turn to the dark side. Ahsoka is clearly a hero, but she rejects the moral collectives represented by the light and the dark, and the unwinnable battle for moral and political victory they are locked in.
The series attempts to reckon with the schematic worldview of Lucas' original movies and to pull the franchise beyond its simplistic setup. Life, it seems to say, is more than light and dark, good and evil, heroes and villains—it's a series of individual choices that are not always so easily categorized.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Disney rejects the principle of good versus evil.
As do all faithful satanists.
The concept that the force is more complicated than simply light vs dark has been a theme in Star Wars books since before Disney took over, it just never made it into the movies because Lucas wanted to preserve the duality.
Everything with intelligence and free will chooses to do either good or evil. It isn’t more complicated than that. There is no gray other than non willful ignorance.
If not to clarify good versus evil why choose light versus dark? To provide for pointless bickering? Is that your argument, which the movie espouses?
I Am Earning $81,100 so Far this year working 0nline and I am a full time college student and just working for 3 to 4 hours a day I’ve made such great m0ney.I am Genuinely thankful to and my administrator, It’s’ really user friendly and I’m just so happY that I found out about thisI worked Here ══════►►► http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
We all know which side you've chosen.
As we do with you. Hint: it's the same as Rob's.
The boogeyman’s greatest trick was convincing the world it didn’t exist.
Palestinians knew it existed.
Now the rest of the world does too.
The term antisemitism has expired.
I don't care, I'm looking forward to the new Reacher and The Boys . As for syfi I enjoyed SG1 and Star gate Atlantis,
The SyFy channels 12 monkeys is now on Hulu, all 4 seasons. Was a good series.
I thought traditional Star Wars fans blamed Kathleen Kennedy for turning the franchise into a woke, shadow of its former self.
She is the infamous "The Force is Female" person who only puts money behind projects that make women the big bad ass. She got her hooks into the Mandalorian and he became a backup charachter in his own season. Ahsoka started off with the women being the only ones with power. So much that a non force using mandalorian is being trained to use the force... which apparently any woman can be trained to use, it's free with estrogen now.
The Wheel of Time keeps spinning, eh?
That's another good example. Ideology over good writing.
"The series attempts to reckon with the schematic worldview of Lucas' original movies and to pull the franchise beyond its simplistic setup. Life, it seems to say, is more than light and dark, good and evil, heroes and villains—it's a series of individual choices that are not always so easily categorized."
Which is contributing to Disney's ongoing destruction of Star Wars as a valuable franchise. Star Wars began life as a break from the bleak, cynical cinema of the '70s.
I wish the Ahsoka I watched was the same one Suder Peterman is reviewing here. His sounds better.
Even his sounds pretty lame. Nuance doesn’t always make things better, especially if the stakes drop off drastically too.
Luke: I must choose between the Light and the Dark Side, between my family and what I know to be right, between freedom and helping control the galaxy with an iron fist.
Ahsoka: Tacos or Chinese?
Is this character trans or at least bi? How can you have a good movie without such “nuance”?
I think Star Wars was suffering from stakes-creep: Death Star destroyed? No wait there’s an even bigger planet destroyer! Emperor dead? No wait he was only a pawn! I found it tiring. I would rather see the tacos or Chinese equivalent - a day in the life of one of the quadrillions in the galaxy.
Right, I don't disagree. Pretty sure this is why the first couple seasons of The Mandalorian were so well received.
And, to your point, my "Tacos or Chinese?" comment is inapt because Ahsoka is the worst of both worlds. Ahsoka isn't just one of the quadrillions and none of the decisions are of any real consequence but keep getting spun up to save-the-galaxy-level significance.
Either way, while there are a quadrillion "one of the quadrillion" stories, really only one is broadly interesting from an audience perspective, and that one appears to have been The Mandalorian.
The thing is that the Star Wars Universe consists of a whole lot more than the Jedi and the Sith, who are notably the two groups using space magic which apparently does have objective 'good' and 'evil' sides to it.
Get outside of the relatively boring Jedi/Sith stories and suddenly the franchise is just another format for the same stories that people love in just about every genre. 'The Mandalorian' was clearly based on spaghetti westerns like The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly and it worked because they were telling old stories in a new setting.
I was a little bummed that the Solo movie bombed since a heist movie set in the Star Wars universe was actually a really good idea, they just burdened it with Han Solo when it didn't need him at all. It's still the only new 'Star Wars' movie that I actually liked.
They spent too much time making Solo about where Han Solo got his stuff and less about what made him the disusioned smuggler down on his luck in Mos Islies Space Port.
That's a problem with all entertainment. After the Matrix everything needed bullet time and wire stunts. After John Wick everything needs shake cam fights with common household items being used to kill people. The Marvel movies have upped the CGI ante and now everyone is making shows where everything is CGI with no plot.
I like to watch movies from the 80s with my son. They are pretty slow for what he grew up on but they have plots that he simply cannot believe. The realness and the way they build to heavy stakes make him unable to watch modern crap.
I liked how they destroyed multiple planets light years apart, and observers on another planet could see them all simultaneously.
Yeah... that was real stupid.
Here is the Ahsoka show made into an 80s tv intro. This Ahsoka I would watch.
I hope it gets enough episodes to go into syndication.
If they cut it down to 2 hours it might have been.
Good for Star Wars. Let's leave the simple-minded good vs. evil narrative where it belongs: US politics.
Life, it seems to say, is more than light and dark, good and evil, heroes and villains
Only if your definition of "more" is strictly physically measured by the amount of stuff you accumulate. As in, if your heroes continually get stabbed in the chest with light sabers and no one dies, yes, you have "more" in terms of characters but you have less in terms of what's at stake and what matters to any given person... including the audience.
FFS, Joss Whedon figured this out in Buffy The Vampire Slayer.
I bent my Wookie
Q: What do you call a show full of "women" with a shitty plot that keeps plodding forward while the "women" get stabbed over-and-over again with light sabers and survive?
A: The Trans-Saberian Railroad
Sounds like a tsarry endeavor. Perhaps woke millennials falcon around.
May the farce be with you.
Ahsoka is not that good.
The Mandolorian is everything Star Wars should have been.
When Ahsoka appeared in the Mandolorian, she was great interacting with baby Yoda and fighting against the evil woman with a spear made of Beskar metal.
In her spinoff, Ahsoka has an apprentice named Sabine Wren.
Sabine is not force sensitive and she disobeys Ahsoka at every turn.
She took the map off the ship against orders.
She later gave the map to the enemy.
She even accompanied the enemy to the other galaxy.
Why Ahsoka keeps her as an apprentice is a mystery.
Estrogen is the answer. Estrogen is more powerful than mitachlorrians.
Listen, The Mandalorian was never very good - and I'm tired of pretending it was.
The reality is the first season was an ok opener. And then it went to shit. Baby Yoda was stupid from the beginning - and its arc should have ended with the first season. Being taken to be trained by Luke was stupid.
I mean, there's no real reason for anyone to care about it - its not like people who can move things with their minds are *rare* in Disney's Star Wars. Be even less rare if the Emperor hadn't half-assed setting up a system to murder them that missed so many. Every fucking system has a 'last of the Jedi' hanging out, barely hidden, still dressed in the fucking robes that Kenobi was wearing. Because Lucas turned into a hack and they became 'the traditional dress of the Jedi' rather than what they were - what you wore when you are a poor hermit living in a desert.
The Mandalorian was amazing... in comparison to the sequel trilogy. Which I admit is a smartest of three stooges comparison. The sequel trilogy was so bad that it made a moderately good show seem all that better. The fact that it avoided, for a season or two, all the BS political correctness made it amazing, in comparison.
If it was released in an entertainment vacuum it would have been just another Sci fi show. Nothing amazing to see, nothing new or innovative. However it was like the Clone Wars series which gave fans hope that there were people who could write stories without the modern pc bs. Mind you, our hopes have been dashed and now this Ahsoka show is the quality we can expect from Disney.
So, game over.
The Mandalorian worked because it was entertaining, something the sequels forgot about. It was basically a western in space, with Clint Eastwood in full armor. And it had a good time mocking the dreaded and feared Storm Troopers for what they were, a bunch of ill-trained and under-powered draftees who were good for blaster practice and not much else.
For the first season. Then they dropped the ball.
Too much focus on making these guys 'heros' - its what killed BOBF before the first episode aired. Killed it so bad that 2nd season of BOBF was actually The Mandalorian's season 3!
When drug addicted, morbidly obese, non-binary, queer lesbian chicks go around ax murdering people and stealing their stuff, then we shouldn’t succumb to simplistic views of right and wrong.
But when a cis-hetero Christian man rejects a woman with a penis on a dating site, there is no nuance about it: that is pure evil, obviously worse than Hitler! The death penalty is wrong, but frontal lobotomies are always on the table for rehabilitation and treatment!
Welcome to postmodernism and progressivism.
Suderman approves!
As for Star Wars, the original movies were the equivalent of junk food. What’s currently going on with the franchise is more like the entertainment equivalent of “you vill eat ze bugs and you vill like it”.
Life, it seems to say, is more than light and dark, good and evil, heroes and villains—it’s a series of individual choices that are not always so easily categorized.
The only people who say stuff like that are the ones trying to justify, excuse, or otherwise rationalize dark, evil, and villainy.
Pretty much.
Yes, people don't want moral absolutism and that's why movies that espouse it are wildly successful.
Trying to twist Star Wars into something like The Expanse or Altered Carbon risks Star Wars meeting the same fate: cancellation.
This is what happens when executives who don't understand their own purchased intellectual property try and wring a buck out of those franchises.
Star Trek went to shit after Roddenberry lost control (and died), Marvel went to shit after Stan Lee died, and Lucas apparently never knew what made Star Wars a phenomena.
What's amazing is that Lucas, for all his huge faults, still managed to make more cohesive 'prequel' movies than Disney managed to do with just about infinite money and talent. His prequels are just about unwatchable garbage, and they are still better than what Disney managed to do with the franchise.
They rejected good writing and acting as well, I only made it 3 episodes
My wife will watch anything, I mean anything. So she watched all of the season. I watched because happy wife, happy life.
It didn't get better. It just got more and more unbelievable.
No, before someone tries "its science fiction, it's not supposed to be real." There is an important element to all kinds of fiction, science or otherwise, are the people acting in a believable manner and are they responding to the actions of others in an internally consistent manner for the charachter.
The way the women in this series act is simply impossible to believe. They are not consistent with the Rebels series, the Clone Wars series or even within the previous episodes of the Ahsoka series.
The men are just stupid children who make grunting noises and are ignored by the women. Who are so superior to them.
So, more of the same. Yawn.
Here's Critical Drinker's take.
1. How would you know - 8 episodes in and nothing has happened except for a bunch of morons doing moronic things in between walking around really slowly. When they're not talking really slowly.
2. None of this is true. There's one fucking dude. ONE FUCKING DUDE. Who is, you know, completely evil but *maybe* not for the sake of being completely evil. And its not like Star Wars hasn't had grey morality before. Andor? Ring a bell? Probably not. The only one of these shows that was any good was the one no one watched. And, FFS, there are 'gray' Jedi in the EU. For decades now.
Filoni isn't doing shit except milking 3 episodes of bad writing into 8 bad episodes. Oh, and space whales. He's really into the space whales.
One thing the prequel series showed was that the Emperor wasn't wrong. The Clone Wars series showed it even more. The Republic and its incompetent governance was worse than galactic anarchy or galactic empire. The remnants of the Galactic Empire introduced in Mandalorian and expanded on in Ahsoka when compared to the Biden level incompetence shown by the New Republic and how easily it has been infiltrated by the remnants of the Empire again goes to show that the Emperor wasn't wrong. So the new "Bad Guy" Grand Admiral Thrawn doesn't seem so bad, compared to the incompetence of the Republic.
If anything, Ahsoka is proving that the Empire is the better choice.
Libertarians for tyranny?
I see it as why the Russian people accepted Communism and put up with it. The Tsars were so incompetent and were so passively evil that anything seemed a better choice. After centuries of the Tsars, Stalin seemed better. Mind you, that's a smartest of three stooges comparison. The Tsars just sucked more than Stalin.
Same deal here. The Republic was so incompetent and incapable of solving problems half the systems wanted to break away and try something different. The result was an overbearing Empire that a lot of people thought was a better deal than either one of the competing "republics" in the Civil War.
The Emperor couldn't have rose to power if the Republic had lived up to its ideals.
The Imperial government *was not better* than the Old Republic.
At least they didn't mind-control people and exterminate whole planets.
Alderon was a hive of terrorist supporters. They supplied arms and vessels to the rebel scum and earned their status as an example to other systems.
How many people in our Republic think nuking one or two of the countries that support terrorists is an acceptable idea regardless of the innocent bystanders? He'll, look at how Israel deals with terrorists. They blow up apartment blocks I'd one suspected terrorist is living there.
Lucas deliberately styled Star Wars after early 20th C sci-fi serials aimed at an adolescent audience, hence a formulaic B&W morality childlike in its simplicity. I see Filoni's "more nuanced" style as a maturation of the franchise (subgenre shift) toward more complex plots complete with flawed protagonists, relatable antagonists etc that appeal to grown-up audiences.
I don't see him erasing the earlier polarity, just expanding the story-telling beyond those elements. The pious Jedi ideal is still out there, and some true evil still exists (e.g. those witches), but now we get to add stories about some characters in between. So I won't be offended by Ahsoka's moral ambiguity, but I will be disappointed if morally ambiguous choices don't come with consequences.
WTF are people getting 'black and white morality' from the OT?
Remember the garbage people the Rebellion works with (like Solo)? Remember the people who infiltrated Jaba's palace and then murdered everyone there? Remember the primitive indigenous population of a planet they propagandized in order to get their help in a galactic war - and then caused an extinction level event on that planet?
When you manage to define someone as NAZIs it's easy to justify any actions.
Stories and myths have always set up good vs. evil, and held up a heroic ideal. It is people who are morally compromised themselves who want to make more "complicated" stories in the "grey area."
Good vs. evil worked. This show may be more "realistic" but people are not tuning in.
Who wants realism in their escapism?
Surprised nobody has yet mentioned the self-contradicting Obi-Wan quote "Only a Sith deals in absolutes."