Review: Inside New York's 20th Century Psychotherapeutic Cult
The Sullivan Institute trapped members and broke up families.

The postwar era saw many attempts to find new ways of thinking and living that avoided the dissatisfactions and interpersonal nightmares that often arose in more traditional structures. Since human happiness and flourishing are difficult and can't be hacked with a mere transvaluation of older values, some of those experiments created more dissatisfaction and misery—especially for children—than the traditional family usually did.
With The Sullivanians, Columbia University journalism professor Alexander Stille has produced an interesting account of a Manhattan-based psychotherapeutic quasi-communal cult that flourished from the 1950s through the 1980s with ideas loosely based on the work of psychoanalytic pioneer Harry Stack Sullivan.
This group trapped its members in endless therapy (with endless fees to support the leaders' real estate, moviemaking, and theatrical dreams) while stressing that parents were always the enemy, and by extension that the patients were their own children's enemies. The solution: Send them away to boarding schools and camps, forever.
The circle of abstract expressionist painters surrounding Jackson Pollock were early devotees, but the story mostly focuses on average New Yorkers driven to grief by the Sullivanians' obsessive need to break up families and to play reproductive Russian roulette in an attempt to obscure dangerous facts about paternity.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I would rather read a book about New York's 21th-Century Psycho-progressive Cult.
"This group trapped its members in endless therapy (with endless fees to support the leaders' real estate, moviemaking, and theatrical dreams) while stressing that parents were always the enemy"
Why does this sound familiar?
Because the playbook hasn't changed?
I just got paid 7268 Dollars Working off my Laptop this month. And if you think that’s cool, My Divorced friend has twin toddlers and(Q) made 0ver $ 13892 her first m0nth. It feels so good making so much money when other people have to work for so much less.
This is what I do………> > > > > > http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Did this cult force its members to wear face diapers after someone had a cough or is that just the current day Democratic Party?
The list of villains who can plausibly be said to favor the destruction of the nuclear (blood-related) family is ever growing. It includes critical race theorists and their fellow identity grifters, the Democrat Party, One World progressives and commies (family creates a competing claim on loyalty and obedience that statists really hate/envy), anti-natalist misanthropes and gaywads of all varieties (resentful of the lamentably stubborn realities of procreation).
It's easy to see the poisonous roots of 2020s insanity.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.
This Website--------------> https://bitcoindollar346.blogspot.com
Not wanting procreation is not the same as desiring either the destruction of Heterosexual families or a cult membership or following.
Start again.
Don't try to confuse them with facts or logic. Although I will at least give them truth-in-advertising points for the handle.