Both Republicans and Democrats Want 'Buy American' Provisions for E.V. Chargers
When the Biden administration temporarily suspended its own protectionist policies, Senate Republicans voted to reinstate them.

While it may seem at times that America is hopelessly divided, there are some issues on which lawmakers seem to agree. For example, both Republicans and Democrats support protectionist policies that drive up prices for consumers.
From the first days of his administration, President Joe Biden has pledged that by 2030, electric vehicles (E.V.s) should make up at least half of all vehicles sold in the United States. The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act apportioned tens of billions of dollars to expand E.V. adoption, including $7.5 billion "to build out the first-ever national network of EV chargers." The administration hoped to build 500,000 chargers by 2030.
To be eligible for funds, E.V. chargers must be built in the United States, and the cost of the American-made components used in their construction must be "greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product."
But in February, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) waived the "Buy American" requirements for chargers "manufactured by July 1, 2024, whose final assembly occurs in the United States, and whose installation has begun by October 1, 2024." It noted that a temporary postponement "enables EV charger acquisition and installation to immediately proceed."
In July, Sen. Marco Rubio (R–Fla.) introduced Senate Joint Resolution 38, stating "that Congress disapproves" the waiver "and such rule shall have no force or effect." On Wednesday, the resolution passed in the Senate, 50–48; Sens. Sherrod Brown (D–Ohio), Joe Manchin (D–W. Va.), Jon Tester (D–Mont.), and Kyrsten Sinema (I–Ariz.) crossed the aisle to support the measure.
"Waiving the Buy America requirements on EV chargers won't help American taxpayers or workers," Rubio said in July. "It hurts American companies and empowers foreign adversaries, like China, to control our energy infrastructure. We should never use American dollars to subsidize Chinese-made products."
Interestingly, Democrats counter that Rubio is in fact the one responsible if the U.S. "subsidize[s] Chinese-made products." After it passed, Sen. Bob Casey (D–Pa.) called the resolution a "cynical political ploy" that "would do irreparable damage to American workers and manufacturing…by forever hindering our Nation's ability to become less reliant on Chinese manufacturing of EV chargers."
In a statement on Wednesday, the White House claimed that the resolution "would weaken Buy America requirements by reverting to FHWA's general waiver for manufactured products, allowing federal dollars…to be spent on chargers made in competitor nations like the People's Republic of China."
"If the President were presented with S.J. Res. 38," the statement concluded, "he would veto it."
The FHWA general waiver, established in 1983, "exempt[ed] manufactured products other than steel and cement" from provisions of the Buy American Act of 1933. But the 2021 infrastructure law mandated that "all iron, steel, and manufactured goods" used in federally funded projects be "produced in the United States."
"Currently, all manufactured products are covered by this 'waiver' of Buy America requirements, which until recently included EV chargers," the administration noted on Wednesday. "Last year, to ensure that the national network of EV chargers is Made in America, the Biden Administration issued a new policy that restores Buy America protections for EV chargers."
In other words, the Biden administration instituted Buy American provisions on E.V. chargers only to then suspend those requirements when it became clear they would disadvantage production. Senate Republicans then criticized the administration for waiving its own rules and reverting to a policy put in place 40 years ago.
Unfortunately, in neither case did lawmakers admit that Buy American policies are a form of economic protectionism that harms consumers by making their desired products more expensive. The Biden administration implicitly acknowledged this fact when it waived Buy American rules on E.V. chargers so that domestic manufacturers could catch up.
"Global demand for EV chargers is putting strain on the supply chain that makes it difficult, if not impossible, to meet the made-in-America standards and expedite construction of new chargers, states and companies warned in comments to the Department of Transportation," a Reuters report noted in February after the release of the FHWA rule.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There are a battery of reasons why this whole thing is bad.
Let's not current day everything...
I'm not too amped up about it.
I find the whole situation shocking.
It’s important to stay grounded.
I’m pretty wired about it.
I think they should volt to can this whole EV push entirely.
Electrons matter
Someone should charge right in and out a stop this.
Watt did you say?
I, for one, am shocked. I thought this was a static issue, but apparently it's become polarized.
Isn't it ionic, don't ya think?
It has its positives and negatives.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,900 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,900 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SalaryOption1.Com
The green new deal promised kajillions of "New Green Jobs". How are you going to get New Green Jobs if they're outsourced to Latvia?
They didn’t said where those jobs would be.
Or “say” even.
Here I thought the only promise they made was soilent green on every plate.
We’ll get crickets too.
>>Global demand for EV chargers
lolz
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
...
After reading this article............>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
Breaking, Jezebel shuts down.
Umbrage feminists are in mourning.
Oh, wow, that MIGHT explain the collapse of The Onion...
Of all of those, I shall miss The Onion.
The Onion is a shell of its former husk. It's become the Saturday Night Live of news satire sites.
that's cold.
When you peel back the layers, if often made folks cry.
It's def getting the chop.
Who leeked that information?
You rapscallion!
Babylon Bee runs rings around the Onion, making the latter's position a bit dicey.
The Bee definitely sliced into their niche.
The onion got fried.
Pluggo most hurt.
another union success story
Vice is dead as well.
When is Salon's death?
Maybe they should learn to code.
Protectionism is okay when WE do it. It's only bad when THEY do it.
Yeah, but only one side is trying to force me to install several of them when I make alterations to my commercial project's site plan.
Chinese shit does have a tendency to blow up.
What difference, at this point, does it make?
We aren't going to buy those damn electric cars anyway, government edict or not.
I'm starting to look around for another 1970 MGB.
Almost entirely mechanical, just the lights and ignition know anything about electricity, and no electronics whatsoever.
Not a computer in sight.
Red Barchetta! a buddy & I built a '69MGBgt from the ground up 35 years ago it was a hoot
..just the lights and ignition know anything about electricity..
Too bad Lucas didn’t know much about electricity.
I don't miss carburetors.
Especially those SU carbs.
Set 'em and then leave them alone worked for me.
At least the feds can't shut them down with a computer virus.
My favorite bumper sticker of all time was on an MG-TD at a vintage sport car race in Laguna Seca (when it was an SCCA track) reading "all parts falling off this car are of the finest British manufacture".
China is gearing up for war with the West. Is it really a bright idea to keep giving them money and building up their manufacturing at the expense of our own?
It’s totally racist to think we shouldn’t finance our potential enemies through buying things made with literal slave labor.
The “funny” part is that trading with the United States was supposed to make China more like us, but we became like china instead.
The whole notion of "comparative advantage" and "free trade raises all boats" is a reductionist theoretical abstraction akin to feathers and bowling balls in a vacuum. Which doesn't say it's not or can't be true but, speaking from a statistical and physical standpoint, you wouldn't just assume you mix two economies and get out more than what you put in without a healthy dose of collective(-ist) optimism or exceptionalism or other assumed optimism. The sensible "null hypothesis" is that you would get something closer to the mean of the two inputs.
You certainly can get free trade that raises all boats but the idea that there is no free trade that could sink all or most boats, that two governments would never knowingly (let alone accidentally) commit to a policy of mutually assured destruction against their own people is idiotic.
Trade and travel makes peace more likely, not war.
You're not paying very close attention to the world, are you?
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
...
After reading this article............>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
It's almost like Republicans and Democrats don't understand economics.
Why not buy the chargers from wherever they can be made most cost effectively? It's not a jobs program.
That would be Tesla. Can’t have that.
But it is a jobs program.
It's a '10% for the big guy' program.
+1
No matter how cheaply you're buying the chargers or from where, union or not, if it's because the government has banned the competition in several states, in the Federal fleet, and is regulating it out of the private fleet at the federal level... it's still a jobs program.
If anything, in light of the above, placing the domestic restrictions obstructs the jobs program down and ensures it doesn't enrich or further more totalitarian efforts.
Instead of isolationist policies, wouldn’t bilateral trade agreements incentivizing despotic regimes to raise worker standards, safety standards, human rights and individual rights be a better goal?
For example: expand the “Fair Trade” labeling system, so consumers could decide to pay more for coffee, bananas, batteries, etc through the point of purchase label - instead of government choosing which products we are allowed to buy.
Basically bring third-world standard up to USA standards, instead of a race to the bottom - which harms American workers.
In such a labeling system, Chinese products would receive a lower score at the retail store if they committed human rights abuses, etc.
Wouldn’t make a big difference. The majority of consumers just want cheap stuff.
Instead of isolationist policies, wouldn’t bilateral trade agreements incentivizing despotic regimes to raise worker standards, safety standards, human rights and individual rights be a better goal?
You do realize you're saying "bilateral trade agreements" and not just "trade" right? As in, this position requires you to assume the best of two individuals engaged in mutual trade, not just the best of one government among its own people, but the best of both governments on both sides of the border.
Basically bring third-world standard up to USA standards, instead of a race to the bottom – which harms American workers.
See issues 2 and 3 in my "list" above. Part of the problem is that US standards for all sorts of shit are arbitrarily high and, potentially, even deliberately so... like requiring all cars to run on unicorn farts by 2035.
In such a labeling system, Chinese products would receive a lower score at the retail store if they committed human rights abuses, etc.
Again, see point 3 from the "list" above. This assumes it's not cheaper just to exploit the slave labor and use the excess funds to either manipulate the scoring system directly or indirectly manipulate the background standards and norms on which the scoring system is based, such as pretending that CO2 pollution is the same as the pollution from heavy metal mining.
Sorry, "this position requires you to assume the best of two governments *not two individuals* engaged in mutual trade"
Since I’ve only read Reason’s side I can’t be sure the supporters of said regulations all want protectionist policies. Perhaps there is more? Say, once a (shitty) law is passed follow it? Or perhaps stopping Federal bureaucracies from making up their own shit and ignoring the law? Biden and the Ds pushed this policy without complete thought so they should own it.
I was going to say the similar. If you can't repeal the solar panel subsidies, you can uphold the provisions of them in a bad faith manner to similar effect. If that makes you look pro-American and/or pro-jobs well... at some point only pesudo-religious true libertarian Scotsmen and bad faith cryptolibertarians who support larger, broader economic controls (if I'm not being redundant) would oppose you (in turn).
Since EV chargers are a useless boondoggle, the equivalent to digging ditches and filling them in again, why shouldn't 100% of the proceeds go to Americans?
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.
This Website--------------> https://bitcoindollar346.blogspot.com