Overcrowding Causes 'Unsafe and Unsanitary' Conditions for Youth In Philadelphia Jail
According to legal documents, children have been forced to sleep on the floor of offices and gymnasiums, with limited access to bathrooms and showers.

One Philadelphia, Pennsylvania juvenile jail is keeping youth in overcrowded, filthy conditions. According to The Philadelphia Inquirer, the situation has grown so dire that the city has now requested that a judge hold the state in contempt of court for failure to address the crisis.
Legal documents claim that the facility, which is built to house 184 juveniles, reached a peak of 242 this June. As a result, at least 30 children were forced to sleep in "mattresses on the floor in the admissions area," or "in physically crowded cells with no windows." Violence in the facility also reportedly increased.
The city claims that the overcrowding at the Juvenile Justice Services Center (JJSC) was caused by the state's inability to transfer youth who have been sentenced to prison into other facilities. The JJSC is a jail, meaning that children are only meant to be held there pre-trial and immediately post-sentencing.
According to legal filings, the city previously had contracts allowing it to send youth to serve their sentences at one of several private facilities around the county. However, according to the Inquirer, abuse at those facilities forced Philadelphia to remove youth housed there. Struggles to find other facilities that will take sentenced children have contributed to the current overcrowding crisis.
Pennsylvania's own policies around juvenile incarceration also contribute to overcrowding. The state "confines youth, both pre-trial and post-adjudication, at
significantly higher rates than many other jurisdictions around the country," according to an amicus brief filed by the Juvenile Law Center in Philadelphia's lawsuit against the state. "This overuse of confinement…flies in the face of research showing little benefit to public safety from confinement, and which in fact shows a greater risk of re-offending among incarcerated youth."
But despite a state judge's ruling in July mandating that the jail reduce its population, the number of youth incarcerated at the JJSC remains well above the jail's maximum, according to the Inquirer.
Making matters worse, kids kept in the JJSC who have been sentenced to serve prison time don't get credit for time spent incarcerated in the JJSC facility—meaning that some have had their incarceration extended by as much as six months as they await transfer.
"Our children are very frustrated because the time they are sitting in JJSC, or lying on a mattress on the floor with lights on 24 hours a day, none of that time counts," Keisha Hudson, chief of the Defender Association of Philadelphia told the Inquirer.
The situation is so dire that some children are allegedly asking to be sent to a private facility in Texas, with which the city now has a contract. Even though the Inquier reports that the facility has "a history of using disciplinary tactics including days-long isolation, mechanical restraints, and strip searches," Hudson said that some youth are "asking their lawyers, 'Please let me go because I'd be closer to coming home.'"
While an immediate solution seems unlikely, there is a way that Pennsylvania can reduce its population of incarcerated children: sending fewer kids to jail or prison and handing down shorter sentences.
"Pennsylvania particularly places youth at high rates for non-criminal acts such
as status offenses and technical violations, with the fourth highest rate of juvenile
confinement for these acts nationally." reads the Juvenile Law Center's amicus brief, adding that 73 percent of incarcerated youth in the state "are removed from their homes for their first adjudicated offense."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm certainly not cheering for poor conditions for the Juvenile jails, but after that story I saw on those two juveniles who murdered a guy by running him over in the street, then laughed about it, then mocked the arresting officer by telling him, "Slap on the wrist, we'll be out in 30 days", then laughed and flipped off the grieving family in the courtroom, I'm finding it really difficult to care right now.
But I know, disagree with what you say but defend with my life your right to say it and all.
Personally, I sleep comfortably in my smug, moral superiority knowing that these kids have to sleep on the floor at night so that we can avoid executing Nikolas Cruz by a 9-3 split decision.
I know you’d be first in line with a callous comment towards incarcerated people, Diane. Stay sarcastic and dead inside forever you fucking glibertarian
What did they do?
Well, from the article, "Pennsylvania particularly places youth at high rates for non-criminal acts such
as status offenses and technical violations, with the fourth highest rate of juvenile
confinement for these acts nationally." Doubtless some real crimes too of course.
screams "stop praying to government" are you learning your own lessons yet?
> Making matters worse, kids kept in the JJSC who have been sentenced to serve prison time don’t get credit for time spent incarcerated in the JJSC facility—meaning that some have had their incarceration extended by as much as six months as they await transfer.
What. That’s just wrong. Putting somebody in jail and then saying that it "doesn't count" against their prison sentence is cruel and unusual and I’m pretty sure that it’s downright unconstitutional. Is the IJ or somebody gonna file a lawsuit about this?
Putting somebody in jail and then saying that it “doesn’t count” against their prison sentence is cruel and unusual and I’m pretty sure that it’s downright unconstitutional.
Uh, not that I 100% disagree with the sentiment, but it's not at all unusual for a judge or court to rule jail time into or out of time served.
Or for the media (and others) to selectively interpret or present one set of "held without or while charged" (not) sentences as abhorrent human rights violations while largely, if not entirely, ignoring other "held without or while charged" (not) sentences.
Ah, vintage m.c bullshit. Since not everyone everywhere is being abused, we shouldn't care about those who are.
Pennsylvania is one of the states whose electoral votes the LP reshuffled in 2016. Its LP vote percentage times the number of electoral votes in play was 10, placing it tenth among the 13 states whose voters gave libertarian candidates more votes than the difference between the entrenched looter parties. PA girl-bulliers and child-bullier bureaucrats are showing their colors since the State went for Trump. So voters kicked the Statehouse nazis out and replaced them with less fanatical socialists. It's a pity the LP is no longer an option.
Green Party also got more votes than Trump's margin in PA.
The answer is to not commit a crime in the first place. Stupid is as stupid does. You get out what you put in.
Most jailed people have not been convicted of the crimes for which they are jailed. And most people awaiting trial don't need to be jailed.
First, many of these people haven't been convicted of any crime yet. Second, I don't give a shit if they did, that still's no excuse to treat them like this. Harsh and inhumane treatment of prisoners does jack to rehabilitate people. If anything, it makes them more likely to commit further crimes when they get out.
the absolute human refuse in this comments section
Finish your sentence.
But what do they have to do to make it counts towards their sentence?
This is obviously a totally false story. The Trumpists have told us that the Philadelphia DA never incarcerates anyone.
Well it’s a good thing that jail is 100% avoidable in a Constitutional society.
You know where I can find one of those?
The United States. We just need to do something about its poor leadership and apathetic citizenry.