Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Poisonous Atmosphere

Plus: Eric Adams vs. migrants, SBF is back, Arnold Schwarzenegger for speaker?, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 10.5.2023 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
capitol building | Joshua Sukoff/Unsplash
(Joshua Sukoff/Unsplash)

In the wake of the ouster of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.), President Joe Biden called on lawmakers Wednesday to fix the "poisonous atmosphere in Washington" and get their act together. "We cannot and should not again be faced with an 11th-hour decision or brinkmanship that threatens to shut down the government."

But the "poisonous atmosphere" existed in Washington long before this week's events. And given that one of the central reasons for the McCarthy drama—other than long-brewing animus toward McCarthy, who struggled to get elected speaker in the first place—was a faction of Republicans being concerned about runaway spending and the looming threat of a debt crisis, the ouster may actually be a welcome sign.

Still: Before any such spending cuts can be addressed, members of the House must elect a new speaker.

House Democrats intend to nominate New York's Hakeem Jeffries, but that is unlikely to go anywhere, given the Republican majority. On the Republican side, Louisiana's Steve Scalise and Ohio's Jim Jordan have announced that they are running. Republicans will reportedly hold a session on October 11 where they discuss, internally, who they intend to put forth.

Some have offered former President Donald Trump as a possibility, citing the fact that one does not actually have to be a sitting member of the House to serve as speaker. Trump has expressed some interest in the idea.

JUST IN: Donald Trump confirms from the New York courthouse that he has been asked about becoming the House Speaker, says he would do it.

That would be epic ????

"All I can say is we'll do whatever's best for the country and for the Republican Party."

"A lot of people have asked… pic.twitter.com/fx3AKlhS17

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 4, 2023

Some libertarians will cheer the fact that the House is effectively on pause until these leadership decisions get sorted out. But the stopgap funding bill runs out roughly a month from now, and this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute—if they manage to meet their deadline at all. Bear in mind that government shutdowns don't actually really save much money, and—frustratingly—don't even really shut down much of the government. So it's not clear that this gridlock would help on those fronts.

Meanwhile, "the yields on U.S. Treasury bonds are now hitting levels not seen in decades," writes Reason's Eric Boehm, and "much of the U.S. government's debt is tied up in short-term bonds which periodically 'roll over' into new bonds with updated interest rates. As a result, higher interest rates mean higher interest payments—and those funds come directly out of the federal budget, leaving less revenue for everything else the government might aspire to do."

In a better Washington, with a less "poisonous atmosphere," the impending debt crisis would be considered a gigantic problem. In the one we have, it's unlikely to be fixed. Let's hope the next speaker of the House sees it as a priority.

Sam Bankman-Fried goes to trial: The trial of former FTX crypto exchange boss Sam Bankman-Fried started yesterday. Bankman-Fried faces seven criminal counts, including money laundering, securities fraud, and wire fraud; the trial is expected to last roughly six weeks. Prosecutors are arguing, in The New York Times' words, that Bankman-Fried "effectively looted billions of dollars in customer money to buy lavish properties, donate to political campaigns and invest in other companies." 

One key component of the case will be Bankman-Fried's intentions—whether he was deliberately defrauding those he worked with or whether he acted "in good faith," as his lawyer claims.

No more right-to-shelter rule in NYC? Mayor Eric Adams has asked a judge to let him suspend New York City's right-to-shelter mandate (also called the Callahan consent decree) under an influx of migrants. Adams is arguing that the spike in migrants expecting public services constitutes an emergency, which warrants suspending the policy.

"With more than 122,700 asylum seekers having come through our intake system since the spring of 2022, and projected costs of over $12 billion for three years, it is abundantly clear that the status quo cannot continue," Adams declared in a statement.

"With approximately 10,000 asylum seekers still arriving each month, the city estimates this mounting crisis will cost taxpayers $12 billion over three fiscal years—an amount that will continue to grow without federal and state intervention and support," Adams argued last month. "Because the city has been forced to bear most costs of the asylum seeker humanitarian crisis at a time when revenue growth is slowing and COVID-19 stimulus funding is sunsetting, the city faces substantial fiscal disruption if circumstances do not change."

This was predictable. New York City actually achieved a balanced budget in fiscal year 2024 (due mostly to better-than-projected revenue), but it expects a $5.1 billion budget shortfall by fiscal year 2025. It's essential for the city to keep its finances under control. Expedited work authorization for asylum seekers who have come to the city would be one way out of this mess; Adams started prioritizing this in mid-September, and Gov. Kathy Hochul has announced a similar initiative within the last few days. Still, that's mostly in the hands of federal immigration authorities, who ought to be more permissive in letting people work. The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment.


Scenes from New York: 

This week, Manhattan finally got its very first beach. But you can't swim there.

"The idea for a Manhattan beach has been decades in the making. Former governor George Pataki promised a beach at Gansevoort, previously the site of a Department of Sanitation building," reports Curbed's Clio Chang. "But it wasn't until 2019 that the Hudson River Park Trust announced that it had selected [an] architecture firm…to turn the concrete square into a beach. The city put over $70 million into the 5.5-acre park, which also features a launch point for kayakers, a sports field, a boardwalk, picnic tables, and 20 million oysters seeded in the surrounding waters to help restore the habitat."

Holy cow, $70 million? Why couldn't this have been privately funded? You can't even surf there.


QUICK HITS

  • Today at 1 p.m. Eastern, Zach Weissmueller and I will be interviewing Aella, a well-known sex worker, rationalist, and data scientist. We plan to talk about porn age-verification laws, whether the sexual revolution was a mistake, and whether there's too much porn in the world. Bring your (non-R-rated) questions for our guest. Check out our past livestreams too.
  • A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary.
  • Down with gerontocracy, please, I am begging you:

Only 3% of U.S. adults say it's best for a president to be in their 70s or older. Roughly half of Americans (49%) say the ideal age for a president is their 50s, while another 24% say it's best for a chief executive to be in their 60s. https://t.co/gKXOfmaY6Z pic.twitter.com/GvbTMM0vTR

— Pew Research Center (@pewresearch) October 4, 2023

  • Britain's prime minister says the smoking age should start at 18 and rise by one year, every year, up until nobody can buy them. (Alternative proposal: We trust adults to make their own choices without the intervention of the state.)
  • Get this man some eye bleach!

I need eye bleach after reading about SBFs and Caroline's dueling memos about their relationship

— nic ???? carter (@nic__carter) October 3, 2023

  • For real, ew:

pic.twitter.com/B8YpncquZY

— nic ???? carter (@nic__carter) October 3, 2023

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger for speaker?

I actually am coming around to the idea that Democrats should nominate @Schwarzenegger for Speaker of the House. A few reasons…

1) He's likely the most popular Republican politician in America

2) I think it is very unlikely he actually does it---why give up a sweet life of… pic.twitter.com/FBnaHuH8R7

— Armand Domalewski (@ArmandDoma) October 4, 2023

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Texas Rep. Joaquin Castro Warns Military Strikes Within Mexico Could 'Be Considered an Act of War'

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupCongressKevin McCarthyWashingtonBiden AdministrationCryptocurrenciesDonald TrumpImmigrationNew York CityGovernment SpendingPolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (310)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    ...poisonous atmosphere in Washington...

    If only.

    1. Longtobefree   2 years ago

      You can take the malaria out of the swamp, but you can't take the swamp out of the legislature.

      1. Eeyore   2 years ago

        Just force them all to take one of the experimental malaria vaccines.

      2. Public Entelectual   2 years ago (edited)

        If New York can recommission a Hudson river sewage works as an oyster bed, why not a Kraken nursery in the Potomac fever swamps?

        The next step in NY urban renewal is returning Yankee Stadium to Hoboken where it belongs.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Donald Trump confirms from the New York courthouse that he has been asked about becoming the House Speaker, says he would do it.

    The following SOTUA would be outstanding.

    1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

      I would die laughing if this happened. Worth it. 😀

      1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

        It would be glorious.

        1. Public Entelectual   2 years ago

          You should volunteer to serve pro bono as House Ear Trumpet.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The trial of former FTX crypto exchange boss Sam Bankman-Fried started yesterday.

    He better watch for non-functioning cameras and sleeping corrections officers.

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      Sam Bankman-Fried didn’t kill himself.

      1. rbike   2 years ago

        Remember when he he was assigned the highest bail ever, 230 million if I recall.
        Then he was let go based on the value of his parents home.

        I remember.

        I was glad to pay taxes to keep him in jail.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Were he caught in Illinois today, SBF would probably never even get bail. The jackass would just be released.

        2. markm23   2 years ago

          Are you saying that you wanted punishment first, trial second? Bail and pre-trial imprisonment are supposed to be _only_ to make sure the accused shows up for trial. If the accused is unlikely to flee, they should be released without bail. Any other position is unamerican.

          And yes, I hold the jailing of the J6 protesters without trial to be a gross injustice, for which prosecutors and judges ought to be tried for civil rights violations and _then_ imprisoned.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Adams is arguing that the spike in migrants expecting public services constitutes an emergency, which warrants suspending the policy.

    I hope border states don't reach that level of emergency.

    1. damikesc   2 years ago

      Oh, Fist, NY is OK because they CARE about illegals.

      Sure, they care about far fewer of them, but they care.

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

        An insufficient number per capita, at that.

    2. Eeyore   2 years ago

      What is the "right" to housing. Can I show up in NY and expect free housing?

      1. Longtobefree   2 years ago

        As always, the Bee is ahead of us all:
        https://babylonbee.com/news/genius-frugal-family-poses-as-illegal-immigrants-to-get-free-hotel-oom-in-nyc

        1. Eeyore   2 years ago

          The picture with little girls with fake mustaches, lol.

          1. gagow1   2 years ago (edited)

            My Companion mother makes 55 bucks an hour on the PC(Personal PC). She has been out of w0rk for quite some time however last month her check was 11,000 bucks only w0rking on the PC(Personal PC) for 9 hours per day.

            OPEN>>>>>>bitecoinsallar12.COM

  5. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    In the wake of the ouster of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.)

    Other Republican House Speakers since 1960 include:

    Newt Gingrich (left in disgrace)
    Dennis Hastert (lifelong boy molester, revered by conservatives)
    John Boehner (resigned - chased out by the "crazies")
    Paul Ryan (retired from politics after embarrassing defeat)

    Not a job a sane person would aspire to.

    1. SRG2   2 years ago

      Not a job a sane person would aspire to.

      Like a sports coach taking over a team with a long tradition of failure, everyone going for the job believes that they're different and they can fix it.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Newt Gingrich didn't leave in disgrace, neither did McCarthy, or Boehner or Ryan.

        You two need to up your trolling game.

        But there are far more leadership challenges on the Republican side of the aisle than the Dem one. Team Blue's minions are extremely subservient, even Bernie was in the end.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Remember Code Pink? Turns out they still exist. And Bernie just had them arrested for protesting outside his office.

          1. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

            When did this happen?

            1. JesseAz   2 years ago

              Yesterday I believe.

            2. R Mac   2 years ago

              https://www.timesnownews.com/world/what-is-code-pink-protestors-arrested-at-bernie-sanders-office-over-ukraine-funding-watch-article-104171293

              Also of interest, none of the corporate press is covering this, which is completely the opposite of when they were protesting Bush.

              1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

                Well they're not MAGA so...

          2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 years ago

            ""Remember Code Pink?""

            Anti-war protesters that disappeared when Obama was elected despite the fact that the wars continued? That group?

            1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

              Are you suggesting, (gasp!) That they might have been astroturf like international answer?

    2. Sevo   2 years ago

      turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    3. R Mac   2 years ago

      You were banned for posting links to child porn.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Pretty ironic that Pluggo of all people is throwing stones at Hastert for pederasty.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Something, something, glass houses and stones, something.

        2. R Mac   2 years ago

          Remember when he tried to label us all “Denny Hastert conservatives”? That was such amazing projection even he had to give it up.

  6. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/FuckKoroks/status/1709806587056173167?t=4H32Rw_kjrPZ-ecBTpz3Sg&s=19

    LMAO the gofundme for the leftist’ activist’s death is for his friends to take time off from work, no mention of funeral costs at all.

    Just profiting off his death. Simply ghoulish.

    Imagine your close friend dies and your first priority is “we can fundraise our slacking off from work”. Incredible stuff.

    My bet is none of this money goes towards a funeral and if there is one, it’s paid out of pocket from his parents.

    Do these people even have real friends?

    [Link]

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      Do these people even have real friends?

      No, they don't. Most of these kinds of people have no real relationships with anyone, which is one of the main reasons why they're such miserable shitheads.

    2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      Notable:

      These antifa losers have proudly proclaimed that cops aren't needed, ACAB, and cops dont protect you.

      One would think someone with this attitude would make the least effort in learning how to protect their own life.

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

        Truth be told, cops do not protect people. They arrive after an incident. Which is exactly why me and mine train for self-defense.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          I really can’t imagine living in a big city and not being prepared to defend yourself at every turn.

          1. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

            No shit.

            Situational awareness is MANDATORY in a big city. .

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              Hell, it's mandatory everywhere, whether it be a mugger in an urban environment or a bear on a trail in the woods. This idiot would've gotten mauled by one of Jeffy's proverbial trunk bears.

              1. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

                Hell, it’s mandatory everywhere

                True, but I am (feel?) safer walking among wolves and grizzlies than walking around Seattle. Animals tend to fear and operate on instinct. Humans can be fucking crazy.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                  Humans can be fucking crazy.

                  Touché. That, they can be. I've had enough rush hour run-ins with total nuts.

                2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

                  incidentally, some basic situational awareness + bear spray would be a solution to all of the above, for the most part.

  7. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    I will be interviewing Aella, a well-known sex worker, rationalist, and data scientist.

    Thanks. We have missed the ENB libertarian slant recently.

    1. Sevo   2 years ago

      Remember that turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

  8. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Newsweek out with a story interviewing high level DoJ and FBI officials stating the number one interest for investigations is trump supporters. This aligns with more than half of D.C. convictions and investigations in D.C. the last 2 years have been against J6 protestors.

    https://www.newsweek.com/2023/10/13/exclusive-fbi-targets-trump-followers-2024-election-nears-1831836.html

    even though the vast majority of its current "anti-government" investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek.

    1. SRG2   2 years ago

      Mitt Romney has said that other GOP members of Congress had privately told him that they won't go against Trump because of threats made to their families.
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/14/romney-political-violence-republicans/

      “One Republican congressman confided to Romney that he wanted to vote for Trump’s second impeachment, but chose not to out of fear for his family’s safety,” Coppins writes. “The congressman reasoned that Trump would be impeached by House Democrats with or without him — why put his wife and children at risk if it wouldn’t change the outcome?

      “Later, during the Senate trial, Romney heard the same calculation while talking with a small group of Republican colleagues. When one senator, a member of leadership, said he was leaning toward voting to convict, the others urged him to reconsider. You can’t do that, Romney recalled someone saying. Think of your personal safety, said another. Think of your children. The senator eventually decided they were right.”

      There was former Ohio congressman Anthony Gonzalez (R) — a former professional football player — who deemed the hostility he faced after opposing Trump too much of a risk for his family. Former Wyoming representative Liz Cheney (R) described similar fears from other legislators, as did former Michigan representative Peter Meijer (R). That these three are all former legislators is not a coincidence: They resigned or were beaten in primaries largely because they saw how the party had turned against them.

      Who do you think is making those threats - Antifa?

      And shouldn't they be investigated?

      Do you, perhaps, even approve of such threats?

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

        Lol. What a weird rationalization of government going after political opponents.

        Especially after Trump supporters were shot, scalise was shot, they were run over.

        First never trust shit out if romneys mouth without him showing the goods. This is a known tactic of the left to present unsourced threats of violence to justify actions. No wonder you do so as well.

        Second antifa has been far more violent. There was even a knife attack on trump at one point retard.

        But please. Justify government focus on going after political opponents shrike.

        At least show me the true threats you are asking about. I gave real actual examples. Not words online used to justify killing a barely mobile senior in Utah.

        What a leftist shit.

      2. Zeb   2 years ago

        What was the nature of these threats? Were there even any actual explicit and credible threats? The excerpt you post doesn't even mention the existence of specific threats, only the worries of the people involved.

      3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago (edited)

        So the rebulican party turning away from the disgusting globalist rinos is the same a a threat to them, got it.

      4. Sevo   2 years ago

        "Mitt Romney has said that other GOP members of Congress had privately told him that they won’t go against Trump because of threats made to their families."

        And obnoxiously arrogant lying piles of shit believe it. Stuff your TDS up your ass and die.

        1. damikesc   2 years ago

          Romney, mind you, was accused of wanting to re-enslave black folks.

          Didn't view THAT as a threat.

          Which makes one wonder...

      5. damikesc   2 years ago

        "Who do you think is making those threats – Antifa?

        And shouldn’t they be investigated?

        Do you, perhaps, even approve of such threats?"

        I'd like proof they occurred.

        Have not seen that yet. Sorry, but "A politician said it happened" is not proof.

        1. SRG2   2 years ago

          And now we have a version of Dreher's Law of Merited Impossibility - "there are no threats and if you don't support Trump you'll deserve them"

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            You failed at your attempt to excuse these actions through redirection shrike. Sit down.

            1. SRG2   2 years ago

              Still not shrike, you lying POS.

              Evidently you're in favour of pro-Trump violence and think that the FBI should not investigate.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                What pro-trump violence? You've presented anonymous accounts of words. What your side used to go kill an obese senior that could barely walk in utah. Cite some specific examples like I did above. Or else, sit down shrike.

                1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

                  Shrike can only lie.

              2. R Mac   2 years ago

                “Evidently you’re in favour of pro-Trump violence”

                Gov’na shrike doesn’t know what “evidently” means. Maybe lost in translation from across the pond?

              3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

                Evidently you’re in favour of pro-Trump violence and think that the FBI should not investigate.

                LOL, these claims have about as much credibility as Anita Sarkissian's did.

                1. Zeb   2 years ago

                  A marvelous thing about the internet is that just about anyone can claim to be getting death threats.

                  1. R Mac   2 years ago

                    WAS THAT SOME KIND OF THREAT!!!???

          2. R Mac   2 years ago

            “and if you don’t support Trump you’ll deserve them””

            I missed this. Where did you get this from?

          3. damikesc   2 years ago

            SRG2, you have a version of "A politician's word is not good enough for much of anything".

            Because a politician's word is not good enough for much of anything.

            They allegedly have the threats. Publicize them.

      6. R Mac   2 years ago

        My cousins brothers friend heard from an anonymous source that you are, indeed, shrike.

        What do you have to say for yourself?

        1. SRG2   2 years ago

          1. You know I'm not.
          2. Romney isn't anonymous.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            "Mitt Romney has said that other GOP members of Congress had privately told him that they won’t go against Trump because of threats made to their families."

            "Romney isn’t anonymous."

            "Jokes on you, I was being retarded on purpose."

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago

            God damn is shrike retarded. The threats he is claiming are dumbass.

          3. R Mac   2 years ago

            This reply is dumb enough to be shrike though.

          4. Minadin   2 years ago

            2b. His 'sources' are.

            1. SRG2   2 years ago

              Fuck me. An actual intelligent reply, rather than the usual spriochaete-induced foamings from the usual neo-Confederates. They'll kick you out of their glee club for being a dangerous intellectual

              Yes. his sources are anonymous but he is himself a source, albeit secondary. And in the article I cited one or two primary sources were mentioned.

              1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                More than you deserve. Pretending Jesse was talking about Romney and not his sources was toddler-level retarded.

              2. JesseAz   2 years ago

                With literal zero evidence that the acts actually occurred or any examples of these threats being real and actionable threats and not just words. While you handwaive away actual examples of violence from the left in your defense of the FBI/DOJ going after almost exclusively conservatives. You're a statist shrike. You support political abuse of power for your team.

              3. R Mac   2 years ago

                “the usual neo-Confederates.”

                Huh, that’s a new one for me. You realize this kind of bullshit is why you’re shrike, right?

      7. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "One Republican congressman confided to Romney that he wanted to vote for Trump’s second impeachment, but chose not to out of fear for his family’s safety"

        Until Romney spits out a name I'm going to assume he was lying, like the last four times Pierre Delecto pulled this shit. Fool me once, shame on me, fool me four times and I'm a (D) voter.

      8. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

        I'm pretty sure those threats were made by Pierre Delecto.

      9. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

        That these three are all former legislators is not a coincidence: They resigned or were beaten in primaries largely because they saw how the party had turned against them.

        They chose....poorly.

        1. Social Justice is neither   2 years ago

          What do you bet these were the Republicans that aided the fraudulent impeachments and J6 kangaroo courts. If so it wasn't because they opposed Trump but because they turned on the US founding principles for power and money.

        2. markm23   2 years ago

          So voting against politicians that turned their back on you is the same as making a violent threat...

      10. TrickyVic (old school)   2 years ago

        ""Who do you think is making those threats – Antifa?""

        ""Think of your personal safety, said another. Think of your children. The senator eventually decided they were right.”""

        Fear of a threat does not mean one existed.

        I keep hearing how Trump is threating judges but I have seen no text to support that claim. I see where he complains about judges, disagrees with the judges loudly, but nothing I would call a threat.

        The Trump threatens meme is overplayed.

      11. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

        All you’ve proven is that RINOs are a bunch of lying cowards.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      Meanwhile nothing happens to the Marxists that say they want to destroy america

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        One of the agents in the story even said violence from the left was unlikely. Blm riots and attacks on trump supporters are memory holed.

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

          It's worse than that, the FBI officially has a policy of there is no left wing violence. It took an act of congress to get the rnc baseball practice shooting, done by a Bernie bro, to get it listed as political violence from the left

  9. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Some have offered former President Donald Trump as a possibility, citing the fact that one does not actually have to be a sitting member of the House to serve as speaker.

    The House just needs to change their rules to allow an indicted felon to become Speaker.

    1. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

      Does not the phrase "indicted felon" kind of destroy the innocent until proven guilty principle?

      It is amazing how much the Anti-Trump people are willing to destroy norms to get Trump because they are afraid he will destroy norms. A real destroy the village to save the village mentality.

      1. SRG2   2 years ago (edited)

        That principle is for court-rooms. For a political party, it makes sense to separate the party leadership from a major criminal case. If the indicted pol is acquitted, he can always rejoin. But you presumably support the Trump Exception.

        And, btw, it was not the Democrats who put that restriction in GOP rules, which rules you had no problem with until just now.

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          So we can get rid of all dem politicians by having a political DA simply undict them. Glad you're on board.

          1. Mickey Rat   2 years ago (edited)

            Yeah, giving prosecutors a potential veto power over their political opponents officeholders only works if you can trust the State AGs are not corrupt political hacks.

            1. SRG2   2 years ago

              Blame the GOP. Their rules.

              1. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

                Which they can change with a majority vote.

          2. SRG2   2 years ago

            "stepping down from a leadership position", not being removed from Congress altogether.

        2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          There's got to be some prosecutor in Texas willing to run Letitia James style charges against the entire Democratic Party field this year.

          You'll have a hell of a time with justifying your "principal" if that happened, Diet Shrike.

          1. SRG2   2 years ago

            I am not justifying any principle (sic). I was pointing out, quite accurately, that the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" is for a court-room. And the rule itself is a GOP rule, not something imposed on them by the Democrats.

            1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

              “innocent until proven guilty” is for a court-room.

              And for society at large...

              Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat—"Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies" was a common saw in the second century.

            2. R Mac   2 years ago

              We get it, you’re illiberal* shrike.

              * Using the historical definition of liberal, not the current usage describing leftists.

      2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        Well, yeah, due process and House rules are not at all the same. Given the nature of Congress maybe convicted felons should be eligible to become Speaker.

        And the Senate with Menendez? What a scumbag. Resign, you asshole.

        but Santos still has his seat. But he is a Republican.

        Pelosi kicked out Katie Hill for a little girl-on-girl fun time. The double standard is striking.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Speaking of scumbags, Shrike...

          Please explain to the commentariat how you managed to get an entire thread nuked along with your old handle, "Sarah Palin's Buttplug", note the lack of a "2".

        2. Minadin   2 years ago

          Western enlightenment principles should not be restricted to courtrooms only.

          Just like not all freedom of expression is covered by the 1st Amendment, yet the principle of freedom of expression should still be valued and protected by everyone in our society.

        3. Sevo   2 years ago

          turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        4. Sevo   2 years ago (edited)
        5. damikesc   2 years ago

          Why are you SPB 2 and not SPB 1 or JUST SPB?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            1. He's a turd.
            2. Something, something, Pluggo posted child porn to Reason, got banned.

    2. Sevo   2 years ago

      turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

  10. JesseAz   2 years ago

    First a dozen immigrants in MV causes the left to expel illegal immigrants. Now about 10% of the problem making it to blue states has caused Mayorkas to begin clearing the way to build a wall on the border. Unfortunately he already sold off all the materials for the wall last year.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/myorkas-cites-immediate-need-wave-regulations-build-border-wall-texas-immigration-surges

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      I fucking LOVE that the bleeding heart dems are landing on:

      - too many migrants, we cant afford this
      - social safety nets and welfare programs are stressed
      - we need to suspend the goodies because the migrants are too expensive
      - we need to build a wall on the southern border...

      Seriously, the Babylon Bee doesn't even have to write this shit, its just served to them on a platter

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        Maybe Fatass should have built that border wall after all.

        But he failed on that too.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Your Democrat friends and allies had more than a little something to do with that, Shrike.

        2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

          the irony of course being the buttplugs of the world (and congress) who declared it racist, xenophobic, a waste of money, and also fought him every step of the way to keep it from happening are going to have to use the same solution in the end.

          This is why people dont listen to your kind about economics, immigration, or really any matter that should be left to adults. Your cult like magical thinking isn't very helpful when pragmatic solutions are needed.

        3. JesseAz   2 years ago

          The more you post here the more obvious it is how little you understand how government works.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

            It's odd how Obama/Pelosi pushed through the ACA with the narrowest of Dem margins in 2010 but Donnie couldn't get his signature and much less costly border wall with solid GOP majorities during his first term.

            Maybe it is you and Fatass who don't understand how government works. If you did we would have that goddamn wall.

            1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

              And again shows how little he understands of congress.

              For you shrike.

              https://www.dailysignal.com/2010/03/10/obamacare’s-procedural-fraud-on-the-american-people/

              1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

                Maybe it is you and Fatass who don’t understand how government works. If you did we would have that goddamn wall.

                1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                  The wall is there, maybe if you guys stopped cutting holes in it it would work.

                2. R Mac   2 years ago

                  Turn yourself in for your crimes against children.

                3. Sevo   2 years ago

                  The TDS-addled turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
                  turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

                4. JesseAz   2 years ago

                  I figured out why sarc defends you now. You make him look semi intelligent by comparison.

            2. Sevo   2 years ago

              We all know that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
              If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
              turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

          2. R Mac   2 years ago

            He understands fine. He’s just a lying psychopath.

        4. Sevo   2 years ago

          turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        5. R Mac   2 years ago

          Nobody here buys your bullshit, pedo.

      2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

        I fucking LOVE that the bleeding heart dems are landing on:

        – too many migrants, we cant afford this
        – social safety nets and welfare programs are stressed
        – we need to suspend the goodies because the migrants are too expensive
        – we need to build a wall on the southern border…

        It's funny what happens when reality pops up and smacks them right in the face.

        1. DesigNate   2 years ago

          Was hoping that would link to South Park, was not disappointed.

    2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      Mayorkas needs to be arrested, stripped of US citizenship and deported back to Cuba.

    3. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

      Only 1.5 percent of them are in NYC, whereas they have 2.3 percent of the nation's population. So, they need to do their fair share and take in more.

  11. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

    The overwhelming majority of Reps who voted to oust McCarthy were Democrats, who were only interested in caysing chaos for GOP majority and gave zero desire to promote budgetary restraint. The question for the budget hawks is, do you have a practical plan to get what you want or are you just making anything unworkable?

    1. Beezard   2 years ago (edited)

      I’d argue they can’t even remotely agree on what they want in the first place. That’s my question to the republicans coming out against this. What was the big conservative big meal ticket Gaetz just tore up? It doesn’t seem like there was any plan at all, past “try and tone down the democrats spending plan by a few billion and hope no one in your constituency finds out,

      Now I totally think their plan will be “make this blow up in Gaetz face”. And he has to know that. But IDK. It’s pissing off all the right people.

      1. Nardz   2 years ago

        The meal ticket was stealing more money from Americans to launder through Ukraine, which has long been Mickey's highest value

        1. Mickey Rat   2 years ago (edited)

          Um, no. I just do not see how this helps. It does not change the political situation that there is a razor thin majority for the GOP. This seems to be tantrum when at a decidedly strategic disadvantage. And again, most of the reps supporting McCarthy’s ouster are not fiscal hawks, so that is not the real reason he is out. Goetz has no real plan to get what he allegedly wants.

          I object to your opposition to Ukraine based on your insistence to justifying it based on anti-Ukrainian bigotry and simping for strong man Putin. You bootlick authoritarians, as long as they are foreign and anti-American.

          1. R Mac   2 years ago

            Wait, your position on funding Ukraine is based off Nardz?

          2. Social Justice is neither   2 years ago

            So Republicans should just accept betrayals from their leadership and follow them like lemmings? If getting rid of him over betrayal on funding unlimited weapons to Ukraine isn't the right issue or time, then what/when is?

  12. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Sad when even liberal WaPo opinion writer Ruth Marcus begins to realize the legal on attacks Trump are bad before true libertarians like sarc.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/liberal-washington-post-columnist-surprisingly-worries-trump-victim-double-standard-ny-fraud-case

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      But he's totes not a Democrat. Just ask him, he'll swear.

  13. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Amere 16 days after Joe Biden assumed the presidency, top officials in his Justice Department raised suspicion among career IRS agents by demanding a briefing on the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, according to evidence turned over to Congress that raises new questions about Attorney General Merrick Garland's claims of an interference-free probe.

    https://justthenews.com/accountability/whistleblowers/new-biden-administration-doj-officials-requested-briefings-hunter

    So much for hands off by Garland.

    1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

      Glenn Greenwald

      @ggreenwald Just watch for how often the most influential articles in the NYT and the WPost are 100% built on what “US officials said.”

      In the headline, in the text: “according to US officials… US officials warned,” etc.

      Once you look for it, it’ll shock you how much is based on this.

      https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1709255645927538892

      Whoops. Meant new post here. Meh.

      1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

        Yup. Its a combination of "people are saying" and actual placed leaks from US intel agencies. Both of which are used to push the narrative of the day

      2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        I wonder how long they've been captured for? Since the beginning? Since Watergate? Just the past decade?

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

          Well new york times ran articles praising the starvation in Ukraine in the 20s,

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Walter Duranty: the model for the typical NYT reporter.

            1. Sevo   2 years ago

              Happen to be reading a book, in part devoted to the Iranian revolution of '78, wherein the NYT runs articles praising Khomeini as 'surrounded by progressive advisors and dedicated to human rights'.
              No, REALLY!

        2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

          They've always been commies or commie simps, but at some point the US intel agencies decided these commies were no longer the enemy but numerous enough and useful for controlling the masses.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            Yes, exactly. That's what I meant by captured. They were once in thrall to the Soviets, but when did the FBI and CIA take them over?

            1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

              Dec 26, 1991, presumably.

        3. DRM   2 years ago

          Always remember that Nixon wasn't taken down by Woodward & Bernstein. They were just the stenographers for a member of the secret police (Mark "Deep Throat" Felt, of FBI COINTELPRO) upset that Nixon didn't pick him as J. Edgar Hoover's successor.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            It's pretty obvious that the FBI and CIA got rid of Kennedy, Agnew and Nixon for threatening their game. Johnson, Ford, Reagan and especially Bush Sr. were their guys. I don't think Carter was, but he wasn't a threat either. After H.W. it was smooth sailing until Trump.

          2. markm23   2 years ago

            So revealing massive lawbreaking by White House staff was just a plot to get rid of Nixon? That's actually plausible - but you're ignoring that there would not have been anything to reveal if he hadn't hired a "dirty tricks" team, then either approved of them doing burglaries, or made sure to avoid knowing what they did.

  14. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

    "A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary."

    Reason's most principled libertarian chemjeff says anyone claiming to be nonbinary really is nonbinary. Even 7-year-olds.

    #YouEitherBelieveSelfIDOrYouDont

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      "men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary"

      Has anyone arrested the bigot who wrote this, for misgendering. I have been trained by my betters that when someone says they are X gender, they ARE X gender, end of story. Weird that now they are "claims"

      1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago (edited)

        It was darkly amusing when some claimed mass shooter Anderson Lee Aldrich “isn’t reeeeeeeeally nonbinary” because “we can all tell he’s male just by looking.”

        By that standard, degenerate luggage thief Sam Brinton isn’t nonbinary either.

        1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

          The narrative is the most important thing until its no longer useful.

          Wondering if/when the "All men who say they are women are women, and should be able to compete in women's sports" and "We need to have Title IX to protect women" ouroboros will actually devour itself. I can only assume its when the number of Lia Thomas copycats abusing the system hits critical mass and girls are just getting wrecked left and right to the point enough people throw in the towel because its too embarassing to watch

          1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

            Entire events that are nothing but men in women's clothing competing with each other.

        2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

          As I said above, it's amusing to watch what happens when reality smacks them in the face... and what happens when they're forced to play by their own rules, like "if someone says they are X gender, they ARE X gender." Of course, they'll just ignore and/or change the rules on a whim. It's all just one big game of Calvinball to them.

        3. Dillinger   2 years ago

          the Bud Light chick is pretty obviously a dude at all times too. don't even get me started on Mr. Wheaties

        4. Zeb   2 years ago

          Yeah, there aren't even that many full on trannies who can really pass. I've never seen anyone claiming "non-binary" whose sex wasn't obvious.

          1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

            It's getting more common on actors' IMDb bios. The lead from that enormous flop The Flash is apparently a "they / them."

            At best, some of the obviously female "they / thems" just look like butch lesbians.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              At some point, you have to wonder if they're just puting in these "they/them" "non-binary" pronouns just to get an acting gig from a woke/progressive director and producer.

    2. damikesc   2 years ago

      So, women in tech are transphobes, it seems.

    3. Mickey Rat   2 years ago (edited)

      These are the rules the Woke have created in abandoning reason and objective reality. Now they have to live with them.

  15. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Glenn Greenwald

    @ggreenwald
    What the EU is doing is exactly what neoliberals did in the US and UK after 2016: looked at the 2 election losses they suffered (Brexit and Trump) and concluded they can't allow a free internet any more: too dangerous.

    Read about the EU censorship law:

    https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1709249697431388530

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      They erroneously think that by shutting people up they will get their way and be able to run roughshod over everyone who opposes them. They're going to be in for quite the shock when reality ensues.

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        It isnt censorship as long as one person in a remote forest can tell a bear next to him the story. - Mike

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Is that bear in a trunk?

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            This is a libertarian bear. Won't be held down in trunks.

        2. Eeyore   2 years ago

          It has to be a polar bear that hasn't eaten in a month.

    2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      I wonder how much longer Koch will tolerate the comments for? Will he shut them down or fund more Jeffs and Shrikes?

  16. JesseAz   2 years ago

    But the stopgap funding bill runs out roughly a month from now, and this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute—if they manage to meet their deadline at all.

    Poor naive Liz. They had 8 months to pass the bills and did not. They will not do so in 45 days even with a speaker.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      "will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute"

      I don't know, she's probably right about this.

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Problem is that was always their plan.

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          Well yeah.

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      And seeing as committees are still active...

      No vote for speaker should be held until all 1e bills are ready to be introduced.

  17. Think It Through   2 years ago

    "The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment."

    I can think of a better way.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      I hear in China they have the camps for people where they a feed and housed, and pay it back by working for the ccp, or donating an organ...

  18. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/knrd_z/status/1709805236116693325?t=Ga4lzszx5Mzv29feqx7WVA&s=19

    In civil wars, people who internalize its master narrative structure are most susceptible to violence. They don't realize what causes violence on the ground: resentment, rivalry, criminality, opportunism, grievance, not ideology or artificial 'sides'. Seems relevant lately

    "But I'm on your side!" You can find these cries in the primary sources for every documented civil war, no matter the time, place, or ideologies. Force all the world into ten-thousand foot abstractions and you're bound to misunderstand human nature, which can be fatal

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      We’re on your side!

      “The greatest thing to come out of the BLM movement is this video right here:”

      https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1709762078083358922

  19. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Bipartisan CBO report in 1999 on the budget surplus with a forecast for ten more years of surpluses (that morons claim didn't exist):

    CBO is now projecting budget surpluses that are
    much larger than those it projected last August, when
    CBO published its previous economic and budget outlook. Cumulative surpluses over the 1999-2008 period are $745 billion higher. Legislation enacted since
    August—primarily the Omnibus Consolidated and
    Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act—lowers
    projected surpluses by $51 billion over that period.
    Changes in factors other than legislation and the
    economic outlook increase projected surpluses by
    $448 billion over the 1999-2008 period. A variety of
    those so-called technical factors raise projected revenues by almost $160 billion and reduce mandatory
    spending by nearly $185 billion (excluding debtservice savings) over that period. A substantial reduction in projected spending for Medicare and smaller
    reductions in several income security programs are
    only partially offset by increases in projected Medicaid costs

    .
    The Budget Outlook
    Under CBO’s baseline assumptions, the first total
    budget surplus since 1969 will be followed by even
    larger surpluses in the next 11 years. The surplus
    grows from $70 billion (0.8 percent of GDP) in fiscal
    year 1998 to $107 billion (1.2 percent of GDP) in
    1999 (see Summary Table 3). Those projections assume that discretionary spending will equal the statutory caps of the Deficit Control Act and that policies
    affecting other spending and revenues will remain unchanged. If discretionary spending increases at the
    rate of inflation after the caps expire in 2002, the surplus will reach $381 billion (2.8 percent of GDP) in
    2009, compared with $514 billion (3.8 percent of
    GDP) if discretionary spending is instead held to the
    dollar level of the 2002 caps after that year.

    https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/106th-congress-1999-2000/reports/eb0199.pdf

    Wingnuts all cry -- IT WARE'NT A REAL SURPLUS! NOT BILL CLINTON!

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

      Before we all tear you apart, and point out you didn’t read your source again, do you want to clarify what your troll is exactly?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        Yeah, I know.

        the CBO is lying/wrong/partisan/lefty/deepstate/Jewy/globalist/blahblahblah.

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

          I was pretty clear, what is your troll here? Jesse thinks you’re trying to pretend that the debt didn’t increase under Clinton. Is that it?

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

            I have admitted that national debt increased many times. I have explained why surpluses caused that.

            Jesse is a financial ignoramus as are all the "Clinton didn't have a surplus" morons.

            Clinton and Obama were the only two presidents in my lifetime that worked to reduce annual deficits. Period. Give Bubba the credit and stop lying.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              There's a difference between the the deficit and the total debt, idiot.

              Deficit: The amount you spend more than you collect in taxes/tariffs/fees. Yes, that shrank, but was not eliminated in the 1990s, especially after the Republicans took the House in 1994.

              Total Debt: The total amount you owe, regardless of your deficit. This still grew in the Clinton years.

              Maybe if you took the time to retake Econ 101, you might understand something. Of course, Shrike, you probably can't even balance your checkbook.

              1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

                He is hilariously ignorant of all things macroeconomics. Its like talking to a freshman econ 101 student that is getting a C in the class

                1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                  Should I tell shrike about how CBO makes projections and what assumptions they have to use per their construction?

                  1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

                    Well, let's look at what CBO said in the same report:

                    In CBO’s forecast, real economic growth, which was
                    3.7 percent in calendar year 1998, falls to 2.3 percent
                    in 1999 and 1.7 percent in 2000 (see Summary Table
                    2).

                    They forecast a slowing economy.

                    Once again, the truth is the opposite of what dumb-fuck Jesse is implying (that growth is wildly exxagerrated).

                    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                      You keep proving your ignorance buddy. Go do some research and learn the rules CBO has to abide by.

                    2. Sevo   2 years ago

                      turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

              2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

                Total Debt: The total amount you owe, regardless of your deficit. This still grew in the Clinton years.

                I acknowledge that the debt grew during the surplus years, you dumb fuck.

                Once AGAIN, Social Security SURPLUSES must be used (by statute) to buy US Treasuries. You dumb fucks don't understand double-entry accounting.

                We could run a $10 trillion annual surplus and debt would still increase.

                1. Sevo   2 years ago

                  turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                  If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                  turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

                2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                  Then you might just want to stop with your silly and false claims.

                  Quick rule of thumb: when in a hole, stop digging.

                  1. Sevo   2 years ago

                    Shhh. I'm making a killing selling him new shovels.

            2. Sevo   2 years ago

              turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
              If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
              turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
              And here he's asking someone else to 'stop lying'?! Stuff it up your ass, turd.

            3. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

              Lol. You admit I’m right but continue to list reasons you’re wrong as being right. Amazing.

            4. Sevo   2 years ago

              "...Jesse is a financial ignoramus as are all the “Clinton didn’t have a surplus” morons..."

              See? Told ya: turd lies.

            5. damikesc   2 years ago

              You should be aware that if you take in MORE than you SPEND (a surplus), it'd be mathematically impossible to INCREASE debt.

              1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

                another moron who doesn't understand double-entry accounting...

                The Medici invented it. I know conservatives lag behind but 600 years is absurd.

                1. Sevo   2 years ago

                  turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                  If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                  turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

                2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                  You're using terms that you do not understand. Double-entry accounting has nothing to do with whether one is spending more money than he takes in (deficit) and will record (usable for an audit) what the total debt is. It's a method for detecting errors and fraud.

                3. damikesc   2 years ago

                  Feel free to explain, in what universe, a SURPLUS INCREASES DEBT.

                  One thing increases debt. MORE debt.

                  So, either there was NOT a balanced budget (there was not, mind you) or you're a mathematical imbecile.

                  Correction, I need to embrace the power of "and" more. You're an imbecile AND there was not a balanced budget. Unless you go along with "Well, it is balanced if we do not include these charges" ---- which, by default, makes it not balanced.

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                    So, either there was NOT a balanced budget (there was not, mind you) or you’re a mathematical imbecile.

                    Shrike's a mathematical imbecile in any case.

        2. JesseAz   2 years ago

          The CBO is literally wrong on every fucking projection dumbass.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

            Because the Bushpigs fucked up the fiscal situation, dumbass.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              It goes further back than that, dumbass. Let's talk Lyndon Baines Johnson.

            2. Sevo   2 years ago

              turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
              turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

            3. JesseAz   2 years ago

              You just keep proving how retarded you are dont you? Dot com bubble didnt burst because of Bush.

              1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

                It was because Bush the Idiot "spent like a drunken sailor" - (John McCains words), you dumb GOP bootlick.

                1. Sevo   2 years ago

                  The TDS-addled turd, ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                  If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                  turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

                2. JesseAz   2 years ago

                  Keep doubling down on retard shrike.

                3. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                  For a guy who claims to hate Bush, you sure shill his policies a lot. Anyway, your man Barry came along and made Bush look like a pinch-penny... and he didn't have an economic collapse, war for oil or global pandemic to blame it on.

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      You are still retarded about this?

      Debt increased every year under Clinton.

      Government: we will get 20B in tax revenues and spend 20M
      Reality: we got 19B in tax revenue and spent 19.5M

      Shrike: Budget surplus!

      Debt went up every year. And the very year he left the dot com bubble popped.

      How fucking retarded are you shrike?

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        "How fucking retarded are you shrike?"

        However turd replies, it will be a lie. turd lies.

    3. DesigNate   2 years ago

      I love that you continue to try to give Clinton the win (just like with Obama) when it was a REPUBLICAN HOUSE that crafted, voted, and passed those budgets that reduced the deficit.

      Nevermind that it was a budgetary gimmick and the DEBT increased every year of Clinton’s presidency.

  20. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Public Enemy Number One for Joe Biden’s door-battering FBI thugs is still the Generic Trump Voter

    "“The federal government believes that the threat of violence and major civil disturbances around the 2024 U.S. presidential election is so great that it has quietly created a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter: Donald Trump’s army of MAGA followers,”
    “The challenge for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the primary federal agency charged with law enforcement, is to pursue and prevent what it calls domestic terrorism without direct reference to political parties or affiliations — even though the vast majority of its current ‘anti-government’ investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek.”

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      They really do view anyone who isn't with them and doesn't believe what they believe as the enemy. Does the Left really want to start civil strife or a civil war? They need to be careful what they wish for as they might just get exactly what they want.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        The FBI is fully rogue, an enemy of the constitution and in actual insurrection against the United States of America.

        1. damikesc   2 years ago

          At this point, I'm suspicious of ANY Republican who does not move to disband the FBI.

  21. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1709768265529020581?t=7LQrtJ6QDNACSUC8X11fzQ&s=19

    The Army vs Navy game scheduled for Dec 9 at Gillette Stadium is turning into a clusterfuck for military veterans and families, because they’re being pushed out of the local hotel rooms, and having their booked reservations cancelled, so illegal aliens can live there!! Unacceptable!

    1. rbike   2 years ago

      Our local army/navy base has the equivalent flag football game the night before. Last year my son played for the navy and they won a squeaker, 28-26.

  22. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Trouble in paradise for Buttplug and Jeff.

    Satanists Turn On Leader Over Transgenderism After He Takes Photo With ‘Ex-Woke’ Atheist

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      "David Silverman frequently posts about his skepticism of transgender ideology."

      Or..."even man who poses with statue of part goat, part angel, part man thinks transgender ideology is a bit much"

  23. Nardz   2 years ago

    Gays and black people are sacred, and the most significant part of American history!

    https://twitter.com/SecDebHaaland/status/1708897679898521725?t=-35bZQDwKxvfQHWFb10aNQ&s=19

    To celebrate LGBT History Month, I joined outdoor advocate and climate movement icon @pattiegonia to discuss how places like @StonewallNPS help tell our country’s full and honest story.

    [Video]

  24. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    House Democrats intend to nominate New York's Hakeem Jeffries, but that is unlikely to go anywhere, given the Republican majority.

    I hope not, Jeffries is an insurrectionist lying asshole.

    On the Republican side, Louisiana's Steve Scalise and Ohio's Jim Jordan have announced that they are running.

    Jordan could be an interesting choice, given his willingness to go after the Bidens.

    Some have offered former President Donald Trump as a possibility, citing the fact that one does not actually have to be a sitting member of the House to serve as speaker. Trump has expressed some interest in the idea.

    Would make Democrats' heads explode. Might be rather fun to watch no matter what happens. It would also mean that Trump would be 2nd in line for the Presidency should something happen to both Biden and Harris. That would probably make Democrats go totally bonkers (as they weren't enough already).

    Arnold Schwarzenegger for speaker?

    Not a fan, but that would modify the Presidential line of succession as Schwarenegger was not born a US citizen. Patty Murray (D-Washington) would be next in line then after Harris.

    1. damikesc   2 years ago

      I also like "He's the most popular Republican in the country".

      Amongst who? Democrats?

      1. Eeyore   2 years ago

        He is an absolute piece if shit.

  25. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

    So Biden has a speech call half of Americans the enemy, sics the doj and irs on political oppenets, and then complains about a toxic atmosphere?
    There is nothing so bad that can happen to a progressive that they don't deserve it

  26. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1709926191849676959?t=9jlDCgQ3MIoQQGUzwYPKAA&s=19

    El Paso today.

    It's an invasion.

    [Video]

  27. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Because why not at this point, but more importantly Trump overvalued his house in estimates.

    Biden Nominates Hunter Biden's Former Colleague To Lead Office of the Special Counsel

    Dellinger and Hunter worked together at the white shoe law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. In 2014, Hunter Biden tapped Boies Schiller Flexner to represent Burisma Holdings.

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      they are just bragging now

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Could you imagine if Trump had introduced a colleague of Don Jr's as Special Counsel? One that had done work for Trump Ruffin Tower LLC?

        The papers would have gone mental.

  28. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1709920684753780936?t=HynGZmLS4aXun_EauNE6ow&s=19

    According to the US Consumer Product Safety commission, more children are killed by 5 gallon buckets every year than unarmed black men killed by police

    [Link]

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      So, what's next, banning 5-gallon plastic buckets from Menards and Home Depot?

      1. Eeyore   2 years ago (edited)

        How else can poor and mentally ill women afford an abortion?

        Her bucket her choice.

      2. Zeb   2 years ago

        All 5 gallon buckets must come with holes drilled in the bottom.

      3. Minadin   2 years ago

        Lowe's gets a pass because they're Blue?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Don't have Lowe's in town, so I often forget they exist. It's Menards/Home Depot/Ace near me.

    2. Zeb   2 years ago

      Amazing how effective that propaganda has been.

      Meanwhile, you can't talk about the real threat to young black men. The main outcome of all the BLM stuff seems to be more dead black men as crime and gang violence increases.

      1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

        Number one killer of young black men is the Drug War.

        1. Zeb   2 years ago

          Yes, the WOD and the social problems it has caused or exacerbated is certainly responsible for a lot.

  29. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1709928744989995144?t=uyM_0FJIjERE-86cI_DC8A&s=19

    This doesn’t work anymore. These commies aren’t bothered by this. They smile at your anger and demand you maintain decorum.

    [Link]

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      Yeah, there's a reason the left is absolutely shitting its pants about its allies being yeeted out of school boards. Not a big deal to use these kinds of shock tactics at board meetings, but you have to drag the commissars out and create a socially hostile environment for them to the point that they disappear from these institutions.

      And this goes back to JFree's observation that "voting" is, in the modern practice, actually an abandonment of civic duty. it's not enough to just vote, you have to be directly and intensely involved in the minutiae of your local community, because that's the currently breeding ground for a lot of this rad-left bullshit. Volunteer for community boards, run for city council and the school board, attend meetings.

      The left has woken up to this now, and is telling their people the same thing, so you can't just assume the fight's over if you get a couple of extra people on the school board. You have to play both offense AND defense; leftism thrives on voluntary acquiescence, and doesn't do well in conditions of sustained resistance. But if you want them to go away, you have to be ready to hit back twice as hard and be very, VERY stubborn when they run the full-court press in their takeover efforts, and afterwards to gatekeep and prevent their entryism.

  30. Nardz   2 years ago

    "Football" aka "soccer"

    https://twitter.com/wayotworld/status/1709919721280127445?t=G6aF5Ao3PfSspjLGDcR1DA&s=19

    Football legend Kevin Keegan (pictured below) is in hot water today, after saying he thinks women should not be pundits for the men's game. Of course, he's right (no one actually *wants* women in men's spaces except leftists), but he's probably going to get cancelled over this, because football is a key cultural battleground for the globalists. Let me explain.

    When Keegan was still playing football in England in the 1980s, both the game and the country were very different. Hard to believe, but it was a time before teams even had sponsors on their shirts! English football was a game for men, and it was almost entirely for *English* men. It was a time before the rabid feminism, diversity quotas, and fake gender confusion of today. It was long before we had heard of 'white privilege' and we could feel good about being English in our homeland. We had a real and positive sense of identity. Like every other country, we had problems, but they were our problems to sort out in our own way.

    How things have changed. The 'English' Premier League now frequently has matches without a *single* English player on the pitch. The vast amounts of money in the game are now more important than the game itself, and the top teams now have more 'fans' living in the third world than in England. The teams are now owned by foreign billionaires and corporations, and make most of their money in overseas markets. As English players have become a minority in their own football league, multiculturalism has seen the English people become a minority in their first two cities of London and Birmingham. More cities will follow this trend.

    And, as English men are increasingly marginalised in the workplace and academia, women's football has gone from being an irrelevance to being pushed down our throats at every opportunity. Of course, right after the 'Lionesses' were thrust into the media spotlight, they were attacked by that same media for being too white! Football, like everything else in today's world, is now a tool for pushing the anti-male, antiwhite, globalist agenda, where national borders are irrelevant and becoming English is a simple matter of climbing into a dinghy.

    As our standard of living is deliberately lowered by the traitors who rule over us, expect the divisions in society to widen and rip England apart. Multiculturalism and feminism have been pushed on us for this reason, and the rampant diversity in football is there to make us cheer for the end of our own nation. I stopped cheering a long time ago, and I suggest you do the same.

  31. Longtobefree   2 years ago

    President Joe Biden called on lawmakers Wednesday to fix the "poisonous atmosphere in Washington"

    But hw will never, ever, call on Chuckles to actually bring up a budget bill in the senate.

  32. Sevo   2 years ago

    "Pelosi Evicted: McCarthy Reportedly Taking Office Space After Ouster Vote"
    [...]
    "McCarthy will move into Pelosi’s Capitol office, Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.) told Axios.
    Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) sent an email about 90 minutes after McCarthy was booted on Tuesday ordering Pelosi and former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) to vacate their secondary offices located near the House chamber, according to Axios, which reported that the email noted the locks would be changed on the doors Wednesday..."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-evicted-mccarthy-reportedly-taking-office-space-after-ouster-vote/ar-AA1hHdcV

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Delightful. Couldn't happen to a better person.

    2. R Mac   2 years ago

      The important question is why didn’t McCarthy kick the ghoul out when he took over?

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        The office is for the prior speaker. Which is now Mccarthy

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Ah, thanks.

          1. Dillinger   2 years ago

            all former Speakers need time to get the classified documents to the garage.

        2. Sevo   2 years ago

          Which Pelosi knew and was hoping would be ignored because Pelosi.

  33. damikesc   2 years ago

    Is it not odd that Letitia James, the prosecutor, is allowed to discuss the Trump case publicly via social media --- but Trump, the defendant, cannot?

    Seems quite backwards.

    As much as you hate leftist judges, you do not hate them NEARLY enough.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      The West really needs a judges trial a la Nuremberg when the smoke dissipates.

  34. Jerryskids   2 years ago

    The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment.

    It's entirely coincidental that under the precept of "no taxation without representation" that the next step will be allowing these "migrants" to vote. They are illegal aliens after all and "economic refugee" is not a valid category for asylum seekers so I'm not sure how this isn't a straight up open borders argument. Of course, as our most pro-union President ever, there's no way Joe Biden would ever approve of importing so many potential low-wage workers no matter how much experience they may have in building batteries or windmills or gathering unicorn farts.

    1. Sevo   2 years ago

      "The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment."

      Naah. It's too move the 'migrants' into those locations most supportive of their 'migration'. You want it? You pay for it.

    2. Longtobefree   2 years ago

      OR -
      The best way out of this is to move (illegal border crossers) migrants away from the USA.

  35. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    much of the U.S. government's debt is tied up in short-term bonds which periodically 'roll over' into new bonds with updated interest rates. As a result, higher interest rates mean higher interest payments—and those funds come directly out of the federal budget, leaving less revenue for everything else the government might aspire to do.

    I'd rather see them spend all their money on debt servicing than what they spend it on now. That would be a major improvement.

    1. CE   2 years ago

      If you have to borrow more money to make the minimum payments on your existing debt, technically you're already broke.

  36. creech   2 years ago

    If one believes the legacy media, there is absolutely no work getting done by the House because the House hasn't elected a new Speaker. While the Constitution says the House "shall" elect a Speaker, it doesn't address what happens if no speaker is elected. In fact, if one were to go around the House office buildings today, you'd find that 435 congressmen were doing just about business as usual: handling constituent services, meeting with rent seekers, attending to committee business, lining up cozy lunch dates with colleagues, trading favors, and seeing what lobby cocktail parties would be most beneficial to show up at this evening.
    Except for voting on legislation, the business of screwing the citizens goes on.

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      the business of screwing the citizens goes on.

      That's guaranteed to continue pretty much no matter what.

  37. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

    Alternative proposal: We trust adults to make their own choices without the intervention of the state.

    What?! Crazy talk! Why even have a state in the first place if it's not going to be used to boss people around?

  38. Bill Dalasio   2 years ago

    this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute

    Gosh it raises the likelihood that they'll pass an omnibus from 99.9% to 99.95%! Honestly, if Gaetz hadn't done this, do you really think anything about the budget would be being discussed right now? Aside from Republicans need to be more responsible and pass the Democrats' omnibus proposal in a month and a half? Even Massie, who I generally respect, was palming off the last round of GOP budget capitulation under the premise that it included automatic spending cuts. Spending cuts that, surprise, surprise, never actually materialized.

    The DC GOP Establishment is fully in bed with the DC Democratic Establishment. They know they have to pretend otherwise for the voters back home. This really shouldn't be a surprise. People whose status and prospects are dependent on the size and centralization of the state want a large and centralized state. The only way you're ever going to fix anything is to disrupt that status and prospect.

    My only complaint about Gaetz is that he didn't create enough chaos.

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      Massie talks a good game but he still supports the status quo when it matters.

      1. Dillinger   2 years ago

        ^^^

  39. Bill Dalasio   2 years ago

    Down with the gerontocracy

    Consider this choice: A government of Ron Pauls or a government of AOCs.

    Age isn't the issue.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      This "down with the gerontocracy" is a clever way of criticizing Biden without criticizing Biden-- or Feinstein. It's a way of kind-of-sort-of acknowledging that Biden is in steep cognitive decline, while casting a wide net of criticism over all people in the age range of Biden, which Donald Trump is. It's the bowf-sideziest of the bowf-sidez argument.

    2. CE   2 years ago

      Ron Paul for Speaker of the House.

  40. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>B called on lawmakers Wednesday to ... get their act together.

    Brandon and Vlad-Z need studio time to record their C.R.E.A.M. cover.

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      No question, I would speed for cracks and weed
      The combination made my eyes bleed
      No question, I would flow off and try to get the dough all
      Stickin' up white boys in ball courts

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        If you don’t get it, “white boys in ball courts” refers to US tax payers in this version.

      2. Dillinger   2 years ago

        no no it was good w/o explanation.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Don’t discount how dense some people here are.

  41. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute

    the assholes were going to fucking do it anyway. pan et circenses.

  42. Dillinger   2 years ago

    surprised SBF gets a trial when Epstein didn't

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      Who says he's going to survive until the trial ends?

  43. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>Bring your (non-R-rated) questions for our guest.

    was Porky's underrated?

    1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

      "XXX isn't R. Now you've learned to be specific."

  44. TJJ2000   2 years ago

    But Biden... UR the poisonous atmosphere in Washington. American Rescue Plan, Inflation Reduction Act, Extended Paycheck Protection, Extending Relief Extension Act, etc, etc, etc, etc - endlessly.

  45. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>I actually am coming around to the idea that Democrats should nominate ...

    Armand Domalewski, write better.

  46. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

    "In a statement, Adams said the city’s right to shelter obligation “was never intended to apply to the extraordinary circumstances our city faces today.”"

    LOL. Imagine, these people when putting forward a truly retarded policy. They, or people around them, never seem to ask..."OK, but what if its not just 100 people...what about 1000 people...10,000 people...1,000,000 people?..." or "do you think a policy like this might have unintended consequences?"

    It really is like giving a young female child a magic wand and saying "OK, you can do whatever you want!"

    1. Sevo   2 years ago

      "...It really is like giving a young female child a magic wand and saying “OK, you can do whatever you want!”"

      "Free" medical care!

  47. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>Donald Trump’s army of MAGA followers

    suits, red armbands, orange wigs ...

  48. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment.

    This is some fucking top shelf libertarian wishcasting. Top shelf.

  49. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    1) He's likely the most popular Republican politician in America

    ?!!

    1. gagow1   2 years ago (edited)

      My Companion mother makes 55 bucks an hour on the PC(Personal PC). She has been out of w0rk for quite some time however last month her check was 11,000 bucks only w0rking on the PC(Personal PC) for 9 hours per day.

      OPEN>>>>>>bitecoinsallar12.COM

    2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      He probably meant the most popular Republican politician in the part(s) of America that count.

      IOW, the large coastal cities populated by people who think and act just like him.

  50. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary.

    Rooster in the henhouse.

    1. Minadin   2 years ago

      That particular henhouse was so full of roosters, apparently, that there wasn't any room left for the hens.

      1. CE   2 years ago

        If you identify as a hen, you're a hen.
        I'm pretty sure that was the rules last week.

  51. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary.

    Keep it neutral, Reason, keep it neutral.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      Helen Joyce, on the other hand...

  52. MWAocdoc   2 years ago

    "this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute"

    This "distraction" will do nothing whatever to change the failure of Congress to do its job. It would be wise for Reason writers to keep the cause of Congressional dysfunction front and center instead of constantly trying to "distract" readers with red herrings - a fight over budgeting and spending authorization procedures centering on the Speakership - from our feeling that a government shutdown would actually be a GOOD thing at this point!

  53. Longtobefree   2 years ago

    "A tech conference meant for women . . . "

    Who would sponsor such a blatently sexist conference?
    I want names so I can mount a boycott!

    1. Eeyore   2 years ago

      Whoever rented them the conference center should be boycott as well. Bake that cake bitch.

  54. Longtobefree   2 years ago

    "A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary."

    There is no such thing as "claiming" to be nonbinary.
    If they say they are, then they are. It is not a claim, it is a fact.

    (Even if it is just for the duration of a conference)

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      This is correct. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one reading the fucking source material around here. It's nice to know at least one other person does.

      1. Zeb   2 years ago

        I think the deal is, anyone can be non-binary if they say so, but it doesn't really count if you don't make a big deal about it on social media.

    2. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

      It is interesting how, after it biting them on the ass, they quickly go back against the idea of rejecting the existence of an objective reality with regards to gender identity. They may even have to define what a woman is in a non-circular reference!

      1. Zeb   2 years ago

        Consistency is not something they care about. The aim is only to be disruptive.

    3. CE   2 years ago

      So they scheduled a tech conference for biological women only?
      In this day and age? What did they think would happen?

  55. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Britain's prime minister says the smoking age should start at 18 and rise by one year, every year, up until nobody can buy them.

    This is a direct assault on the American colonies.

    1. CE   2 years ago

      They are still bitter about losing in Virginia.

  56. CE   2 years ago

    If Biden is so worried about Democrats voting out the Speaker of the House, why didn't he tell them not to?

    If Republicans are so worried that one Congressman can call for a no-confidence vote, how about nominating someone who a majority of the Congress has confidence in?

  57. Panhandle   2 years ago

    With more than 122,700 asylum seekers having come through our intake system since the spring of 2022, and projected costs of over $12 billion for three years, it is abundantly clear that the status quo cannot continue

    $12B/3 = $4B/year/122,700 people = $35,492/person/year.
    I am going to hope I am missing something.

  58. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

    Also of note, ran in the opposite direction of the love of his life, which would have left the attacker free rein to stab her to death. Stupid, terrible instincts, and a coward.

    As you said, guy was half his size. Knife or not, its do or die, your wife is there with you, real men make it work. This was a soyboy through and through.

  59. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/UsingLyft/status/1709918130930119070?t=pV5cXXpl4fa7Sb2_PpC-uw&s=19

    The fact that guy who stabbed him wasn’t even a homeless schizo but someone who was working in the public school system is just mind boggling

  60. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago

    That was his first face-to-face confrontation of his entire life. Having never considered actual self-defense, he didn't have a clue what to do.

  61. damikesc   2 years ago

    Is it wrong to call this one of the more Darwin-esque of Darwin Awards?

  62. VirginiaLamm   2 years ago (edited)

    Earn money in USA, high scores from trusted resources. Work at your own pace. Regular Payments. Search in different job categories. Work anywhere on your vs03 computer, laptop or mobile phone. Update your profile at any time.
    .
    .
    Detail Here———->>> http://Www.Smartcash1.com

  63. R Mac   2 years ago

    The person who posted the video when I first saw it commented something along the lines of “This video has a great ending”. Unaware of the context, I assumed the big white guy was going to just lay him out.

  64. Idaho-Bob   2 years ago (edited)
  65. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

    Does it have English teeth?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Zohran Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Stores Won't Lower Prices

Jack Nicastro | 6.25.2025 5:10 PM

On Housing, All New York Politicians Are Socialists

Christian Britschgi | 6.25.2025 4:30 PM

Reason Earns 15 Southern California Journalism Awards

Billy Binion | 6.25.2025 3:53 PM

Tariffs Are Keeping Interest Rates High

Eric Boehm | 6.25.2025 3:05 PM

The Biggest Impediment to Kathy Hochul's Pro-Nuclear Plan for New York Is the Government

Jeff Luse | 6.25.2025 2:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!