Poisonous Atmosphere
Plus: Eric Adams vs. migrants, SBF is back, Arnold Schwarzenegger for speaker?, and more...

In the wake of the ouster of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.), President Joe Biden called on lawmakers Wednesday to fix the "poisonous atmosphere in Washington" and get their act together. "We cannot and should not again be faced with an 11th-hour decision or brinkmanship that threatens to shut down the government."
But the "poisonous atmosphere" existed in Washington long before this week's events. And given that one of the central reasons for the McCarthy drama—other than long-brewing animus toward McCarthy, who struggled to get elected speaker in the first place—was a faction of Republicans being concerned about runaway spending and the looming threat of a debt crisis, the ouster may actually be a welcome sign.
Still: Before any such spending cuts can be addressed, members of the House must elect a new speaker.
House Democrats intend to nominate New York's Hakeem Jeffries, but that is unlikely to go anywhere, given the Republican majority. On the Republican side, Louisiana's Steve Scalise and Ohio's Jim Jordan have announced that they are running. Republicans will reportedly hold a session on October 11 where they discuss, internally, who they intend to put forth.
Some have offered former President Donald Trump as a possibility, citing the fact that one does not actually have to be a sitting member of the House to serve as speaker. Trump has expressed some interest in the idea.
JUST IN: Donald Trump confirms from the New York courthouse that he has been asked about becoming the House Speaker, says he would do it.
That would be epic ????
"All I can say is we'll do whatever's best for the country and for the Republican Party."
"A lot of people have asked… pic.twitter.com/fx3AKlhS17
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 4, 2023
Some libertarians will cheer the fact that the House is effectively on pause until these leadership decisions get sorted out. But the stopgap funding bill runs out roughly a month from now, and this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute—if they manage to meet their deadline at all. Bear in mind that government shutdowns don't actually really save much money, and—frustratingly—don't even really shut down much of the government. So it's not clear that this gridlock would help on those fronts.
Meanwhile, "the yields on U.S. Treasury bonds are now hitting levels not seen in decades," writes Reason's Eric Boehm, and "much of the U.S. government's debt is tied up in short-term bonds which periodically 'roll over' into new bonds with updated interest rates. As a result, higher interest rates mean higher interest payments—and those funds come directly out of the federal budget, leaving less revenue for everything else the government might aspire to do."
In a better Washington, with a less "poisonous atmosphere," the impending debt crisis would be considered a gigantic problem. In the one we have, it's unlikely to be fixed. Let's hope the next speaker of the House sees it as a priority.
Sam Bankman-Fried goes to trial: The trial of former FTX crypto exchange boss Sam Bankman-Fried started yesterday. Bankman-Fried faces seven criminal counts, including money laundering, securities fraud, and wire fraud; the trial is expected to last roughly six weeks. Prosecutors are arguing, in The New York Times' words, that Bankman-Fried "effectively looted billions of dollars in customer money to buy lavish properties, donate to political campaigns and invest in other companies."
One key component of the case will be Bankman-Fried's intentions—whether he was deliberately defrauding those he worked with or whether he acted "in good faith," as his lawyer claims.
No more right-to-shelter rule in NYC? Mayor Eric Adams has asked a judge to let him suspend New York City's right-to-shelter mandate (also called the Callahan consent decree) under an influx of migrants. Adams is arguing that the spike in migrants expecting public services constitutes an emergency, which warrants suspending the policy.
"With more than 122,700 asylum seekers having come through our intake system since the spring of 2022, and projected costs of over $12 billion for three years, it is abundantly clear that the status quo cannot continue," Adams declared in a statement.
"With approximately 10,000 asylum seekers still arriving each month, the city estimates this mounting crisis will cost taxpayers $12 billion over three fiscal years—an amount that will continue to grow without federal and state intervention and support," Adams argued last month. "Because the city has been forced to bear most costs of the asylum seeker humanitarian crisis at a time when revenue growth is slowing and COVID-19 stimulus funding is sunsetting, the city faces substantial fiscal disruption if circumstances do not change."
This was predictable. New York City actually achieved a balanced budget in fiscal year 2024 (due mostly to better-than-projected revenue), but it expects a $5.1 billion budget shortfall by fiscal year 2025. It's essential for the city to keep its finances under control. Expedited work authorization for asylum seekers who have come to the city would be one way out of this mess; Adams started prioritizing this in mid-September, and Gov. Kathy Hochul has announced a similar initiative within the last few days. Still, that's mostly in the hands of federal immigration authorities, who ought to be more permissive in letting people work. The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment.
Scenes from New York:
This week, Manhattan finally got its very first beach. But you can't swim there.
"The idea for a Manhattan beach has been decades in the making. Former governor George Pataki promised a beach at Gansevoort, previously the site of a Department of Sanitation building," reports Curbed's Clio Chang. "But it wasn't until 2019 that the Hudson River Park Trust announced that it had selected [an] architecture firm…to turn the concrete square into a beach. The city put over $70 million into the 5.5-acre park, which also features a launch point for kayakers, a sports field, a boardwalk, picnic tables, and 20 million oysters seeded in the surrounding waters to help restore the habitat."
Holy cow, $70 million? Why couldn't this have been privately funded? You can't even surf there.
QUICK HITS
- Today at 1 p.m. Eastern, Zach Weissmueller and I will be interviewing Aella, a well-known sex worker, rationalist, and data scientist. We plan to talk about porn age-verification laws, whether the sexual revolution was a mistake, and whether there's too much porn in the world. Bring your (non-R-rated) questions for our guest. Check out our past livestreams too.
- A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary.
- Down with gerontocracy, please, I am begging you:
Only 3% of U.S. adults say it's best for a president to be in their 70s or older. Roughly half of Americans (49%) say the ideal age for a president is their 50s, while another 24% say it's best for a chief executive to be in their 60s. https://t.co/gKXOfmaY6Z pic.twitter.com/GvbTMM0vTR
— Pew Research Center (@pewresearch) October 4, 2023
- Britain's prime minister says the smoking age should start at 18 and rise by one year, every year, up until nobody can buy them. (Alternative proposal: We trust adults to make their own choices without the intervention of the state.)
- Get this man some eye bleach!
I need eye bleach after reading about SBFs and Caroline's dueling memos about their relationship
— nic ???? carter (@nic__carter) October 3, 2023
- For real, ew:
— nic ???? carter (@nic__carter) October 3, 2023
- Arnold Schwarzenegger for speaker?
I actually am coming around to the idea that Democrats should nominate @Schwarzenegger for Speaker of the House. A few reasons…
1) He's likely the most popular Republican politician in America
2) I think it is very unlikely he actually does it---why give up a sweet life of… pic.twitter.com/FBnaHuH8R7
— Armand Domalewski (@ArmandDoma) October 4, 2023
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...poisonous atmosphere in Washington...
If only.
You can take the malaria out of the swamp, but you can't take the swamp out of the legislature.
Just force them all to take one of the experimental malaria vaccines.
If New York can recommission a Hudson river sewage works as an oyster bed, why not a Kraken nursery in the Potomac fever swamps?
The next step in NY urban renewal is returning Yankee Stadium to Hoboken where it belongs.
Donald Trump confirms from the New York courthouse that he has been asked about becoming the House Speaker, says he would do it.
The following SOTUA would be outstanding.
I would die laughing if this happened. Worth it. 😀
It would be glorious.
You should volunteer to serve pro bono as House Ear Trumpet.
The trial of former FTX crypto exchange boss Sam Bankman-Fried started yesterday.
He better watch for non-functioning cameras and sleeping corrections officers.
Sam Bankman-Fried didn’t kill himself.
Remember when he he was assigned the highest bail ever, 230 million if I recall.
Then he was let go based on the value of his parents home.
I remember.
I was glad to pay taxes to keep him in jail.
Were he caught in Illinois today, SBF would probably never even get bail. The jackass would just be released.
Are you saying that you wanted punishment first, trial second? Bail and pre-trial imprisonment are supposed to be _only_ to make sure the accused shows up for trial. If the accused is unlikely to flee, they should be released without bail. Any other position is unamerican.
And yes, I hold the jailing of the J6 protesters without trial to be a gross injustice, for which prosecutors and judges ought to be tried for civil rights violations and _then_ imprisoned.
Adams is arguing that the spike in migrants expecting public services constitutes an emergency, which warrants suspending the policy.
I hope border states don't reach that level of emergency.
Oh, Fist, NY is OK because they CARE about illegals.
Sure, they care about far fewer of them, but they care.
An insufficient number per capita, at that.
What is the "right" to housing. Can I show up in NY and expect free housing?
As always, the Bee is ahead of us all:
https://babylonbee.com/news/genius-frugal-family-poses-as-illegal-immigrants-to-get-free-hotel-oom-in-nyc
The picture with little girls with fake mustaches, lol.
My Companion mother makes 55 bucks an hour on the PC(Personal PC). She has been out of w0rk for quite some time however last month her check was 11,000 bucks only w0rking on the PC(Personal PC) for 9 hours per day.
OPEN>>>>>>bitecoinsallar12.COM
In the wake of the ouster of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.)
Other Republican House Speakers since 1960 include:
Newt Gingrich (left in disgrace)
Dennis Hastert (lifelong boy molester, revered by conservatives)
John Boehner (resigned - chased out by the "crazies")
Paul Ryan (retired from politics after embarrassing defeat)
Not a job a sane person would aspire to.
Not a job a sane person would aspire to.
Like a sports coach taking over a team with a long tradition of failure, everyone going for the job believes that they're different and they can fix it.
Newt Gingrich didn't leave in disgrace, neither did McCarthy, or Boehner or Ryan.
You two need to up your trolling game.
But there are far more leadership challenges on the Republican side of the aisle than the Dem one. Team Blue's minions are extremely subservient, even Bernie was in the end.
Remember Code Pink? Turns out they still exist. And Bernie just had them arrested for protesting outside his office.
When did this happen?
Yesterday I believe.
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/what-is-code-pink-protestors-arrested-at-bernie-sanders-office-over-ukraine-funding-watch-article-104171293
Also of interest, none of the corporate press is covering this, which is completely the opposite of when they were protesting Bush.
Well they're not MAGA so...
""Remember Code Pink?""
Anti-war protesters that disappeared when Obama was elected despite the fact that the wars continued? That group?
Are you suggesting, (gasp!) That they might have been astroturf like international answer?
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
You were banned for posting links to child porn.
Pretty ironic that Pluggo of all people is throwing stones at Hastert for pederasty.
Something, something, glass houses and stones, something.
Remember when he tried to label us all “Denny Hastert conservatives”? That was such amazing projection even he had to give it up.
https://twitter.com/FuckKoroks/status/1709806587056173167?t=4H32Rw_kjrPZ-ecBTpz3Sg&s=19
LMAO the gofundme for the leftist’ activist’s death is for his friends to take time off from work, no mention of funeral costs at all.
Just profiting off his death. Simply ghoulish.
Imagine your close friend dies and your first priority is “we can fundraise our slacking off from work”. Incredible stuff.
My bet is none of this money goes towards a funeral and if there is one, it’s paid out of pocket from his parents.
Do these people even have real friends?
[Link]
Do these people even have real friends?
No, they don't. Most of these kinds of people have no real relationships with anyone, which is one of the main reasons why they're such miserable shitheads.
Notable:
These antifa losers have proudly proclaimed that cops aren't needed, ACAB, and cops dont protect you.
One would think someone with this attitude would make the least effort in learning how to protect their own life.
Truth be told, cops do not protect people. They arrive after an incident. Which is exactly why me and mine train for self-defense.
I really can’t imagine living in a big city and not being prepared to defend yourself at every turn.
No shit.
Situational awareness is MANDATORY in a big city. .
Hell, it's mandatory everywhere, whether it be a mugger in an urban environment or a bear on a trail in the woods. This idiot would've gotten mauled by one of Jeffy's proverbial trunk bears.
Hell, it’s mandatory everywhere
True, but I am (feel?) safer walking among wolves and grizzlies than walking around Seattle. Animals tend to fear and operate on instinct. Humans can be fucking crazy.
Humans can be fucking crazy.
Touché. That, they can be. I've had enough rush hour run-ins with total nuts.
incidentally, some basic situational awareness + bear spray would be a solution to all of the above, for the most part.
I will be interviewing Aella, a well-known sex worker, rationalist, and data scientist.
Thanks. We have missed the ENB libertarian slant recently.
Remember that turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Newsweek out with a story interviewing high level DoJ and FBI officials stating the number one interest for investigations is trump supporters. This aligns with more than half of D.C. convictions and investigations in D.C. the last 2 years have been against J6 protestors.
https://www.newsweek.com/2023/10/13/exclusive-fbi-targets-trump-followers-2024-election-nears-1831836.html
even though the vast majority of its current "anti-government" investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek.
Mitt Romney has said that other GOP members of Congress had privately told him that they won't go against Trump because of threats made to their families.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/14/romney-political-violence-republicans/
“One Republican congressman confided to Romney that he wanted to vote for Trump’s second impeachment, but chose not to out of fear for his family’s safety,” Coppins writes. “The congressman reasoned that Trump would be impeached by House Democrats with or without him — why put his wife and children at risk if it wouldn’t change the outcome?
“Later, during the Senate trial, Romney heard the same calculation while talking with a small group of Republican colleagues. When one senator, a member of leadership, said he was leaning toward voting to convict, the others urged him to reconsider. You can’t do that, Romney recalled someone saying. Think of your personal safety, said another. Think of your children. The senator eventually decided they were right.”
There was former Ohio congressman Anthony Gonzalez (R) — a former professional football player — who deemed the hostility he faced after opposing Trump too much of a risk for his family. Former Wyoming representative Liz Cheney (R) described similar fears from other legislators, as did former Michigan representative Peter Meijer (R). That these three are all former legislators is not a coincidence: They resigned or were beaten in primaries largely because they saw how the party had turned against them.
Who do you think is making those threats - Antifa?
And shouldn't they be investigated?
Do you, perhaps, even approve of such threats?
Lol. What a weird rationalization of government going after political opponents.
Especially after Trump supporters were shot, scalise was shot, they were run over.
First never trust shit out if romneys mouth without him showing the goods. This is a known tactic of the left to present unsourced threats of violence to justify actions. No wonder you do so as well.
Second antifa has been far more violent. There was even a knife attack on trump at one point retard.
But please. Justify government focus on going after political opponents shrike.
At least show me the true threats you are asking about. I gave real actual examples. Not words online used to justify killing a barely mobile senior in Utah.
What a leftist shit.
What was the nature of these threats? Were there even any actual explicit and credible threats? The excerpt you post doesn't even mention the existence of specific threats, only the worries of the people involved.
So the rebulican party turning away from the disgusting globalist rinos is the same a a threat to them, got it.
"Mitt Romney has said that other GOP members of Congress had privately told him that they won’t go against Trump because of threats made to their families."
And obnoxiously arrogant lying piles of shit believe it. Stuff your TDS up your ass and die.
Romney, mind you, was accused of wanting to re-enslave black folks.
Didn't view THAT as a threat.
Which makes one wonder...
"Who do you think is making those threats – Antifa?
And shouldn’t they be investigated?
Do you, perhaps, even approve of such threats?"
I'd like proof they occurred.
Have not seen that yet. Sorry, but "A politician said it happened" is not proof.
And now we have a version of Dreher's Law of Merited Impossibility - "there are no threats and if you don't support Trump you'll deserve them"
You failed at your attempt to excuse these actions through redirection shrike. Sit down.
Still not shrike, you lying POS.
Evidently you're in favour of pro-Trump violence and think that the FBI should not investigate.
What pro-trump violence? You've presented anonymous accounts of words. What your side used to go kill an obese senior that could barely walk in utah. Cite some specific examples like I did above. Or else, sit down shrike.
Shrike can only lie.
“Evidently you’re in favour of pro-Trump violence”
Gov’na shrike doesn’t know what “evidently” means. Maybe lost in translation from across the pond?
Evidently you’re in favour of pro-Trump violence and think that the FBI should not investigate.
LOL, these claims have about as much credibility as Anita Sarkissian's did.
A marvelous thing about the internet is that just about anyone can claim to be getting death threats.
WAS THAT SOME KIND OF THREAT!!!???
“and if you don’t support Trump you’ll deserve them””
I missed this. Where did you get this from?
SRG2, you have a version of "A politician's word is not good enough for much of anything".
Because a politician's word is not good enough for much of anything.
They allegedly have the threats. Publicize them.
My cousins brothers friend heard from an anonymous source that you are, indeed, shrike.
What do you have to say for yourself?
1. You know I'm not.
2. Romney isn't anonymous.
"Mitt Romney has said that other GOP members of Congress had privately told him that they won’t go against Trump because of threats made to their families."
"Romney isn’t anonymous."
"Jokes on you, I was being retarded on purpose."
God damn is shrike retarded. The threats he is claiming are dumbass.
This reply is dumb enough to be shrike though.
2b. His 'sources' are.
Fuck me. An actual intelligent reply, rather than the usual spriochaete-induced foamings from the usual neo-Confederates. They'll kick you out of their glee club for being a dangerous intellectual
Yes. his sources are anonymous but he is himself a source, albeit secondary. And in the article I cited one or two primary sources were mentioned.
More than you deserve. Pretending Jesse was talking about Romney and not his sources was toddler-level retarded.
With literal zero evidence that the acts actually occurred or any examples of these threats being real and actionable threats and not just words. While you handwaive away actual examples of violence from the left in your defense of the FBI/DOJ going after almost exclusively conservatives. You're a statist shrike. You support political abuse of power for your team.
“the usual neo-Confederates.”
Huh, that’s a new one for me. You realize this kind of bullshit is why you’re shrike, right?
"One Republican congressman confided to Romney that he wanted to vote for Trump’s second impeachment, but chose not to out of fear for his family’s safety"
Until Romney spits out a name I'm going to assume he was lying, like the last four times Pierre Delecto pulled this shit. Fool me once, shame on me, fool me four times and I'm a (D) voter.
I'm pretty sure those threats were made by Pierre Delecto.
They chose....poorly.
What do you bet these were the Republicans that aided the fraudulent impeachments and J6 kangaroo courts. If so it wasn't because they opposed Trump but because they turned on the US founding principles for power and money.
So voting against politicians that turned their back on you is the same as making a violent threat...
""Who do you think is making those threats – Antifa?""
""Think of your personal safety, said another. Think of your children. The senator eventually decided they were right.”""
Fear of a threat does not mean one existed.
I keep hearing how Trump is threating judges but I have seen no text to support that claim. I see where he complains about judges, disagrees with the judges loudly, but nothing I would call a threat.
The Trump threatens meme is overplayed.
All you’ve proven is that RINOs are a bunch of lying cowards.
Meanwhile nothing happens to the Marxists that say they want to destroy america
One of the agents in the story even said violence from the left was unlikely. Blm riots and attacks on trump supporters are memory holed.
It's worse than that, the FBI officially has a policy of there is no left wing violence. It took an act of congress to get the rnc baseball practice shooting, done by a Bernie bro, to get it listed as political violence from the left
Some have offered former President Donald Trump as a possibility, citing the fact that one does not actually have to be a sitting member of the House to serve as speaker.
The House just needs to change their rules to allow an indicted felon to become Speaker.
Does not the phrase "indicted felon" kind of destroy the innocent until proven guilty principle?
It is amazing how much the Anti-Trump people are willing to destroy norms to get Trump because they are afraid he will destroy norms. A real destroy the village to save the village mentality.
That principle is for court-rooms. For a political party, it makes sense to separate the party leadership from a major criminal case. If the indicted pol is acquitted, he can always rejoin. But you presumably support the Trump Exception.
And, btw, it was not the Democrats who put that restriction in GOP rules, which rules you had no problem with until just now.
So we can get rid of all dem politicians by having a political DA simply undict them. Glad you're on board.
Yeah, giving prosecutors a potential veto power over their political opponents officeholders only works if you can trust the State AGs are not corrupt political hacks.
Blame the GOP. Their rules.
Which they can change with a majority vote.
"stepping down from a leadership position", not being removed from Congress altogether.
There's got to be some prosecutor in Texas willing to run Letitia James style charges against the entire Democratic Party field this year.
You'll have a hell of a time with justifying your "principal" if that happened, Diet Shrike.
I am not justifying any principle (sic). I was pointing out, quite accurately, that the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" is for a court-room. And the rule itself is a GOP rule, not something imposed on them by the Democrats.
“innocent until proven guilty” is for a court-room.
And for society at large...
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat—"Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies" was a common saw in the second century.
We get it, you’re illiberal* shrike.
* Using the historical definition of liberal, not the current usage describing leftists.
Well, yeah, due process and House rules are not at all the same. Given the nature of Congress maybe convicted felons should be eligible to become Speaker.
And the Senate with Menendez? What a scumbag. Resign, you asshole.
but Santos still has his seat. But he is a Republican.
Pelosi kicked out Katie Hill for a little girl-on-girl fun time. The double standard is striking.
Speaking of scumbags, Shrike...
Please explain to the commentariat how you managed to get an entire thread nuked along with your old handle, "Sarah Palin's Buttplug", note the lack of a "2".
Western enlightenment principles should not be restricted to courtrooms only.
Just like not all freedom of expression is covered by the 1st Amendment, yet the principle of freedom of expression should still be valued and protected by everyone in our society.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Why are you SPB 2 and not SPB 1 or JUST SPB?
1. He's a turd.
2. Something, something, Pluggo posted child porn to Reason, got banned.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
First a dozen immigrants in MV causes the left to expel illegal immigrants. Now about 10% of the problem making it to blue states has caused Mayorkas to begin clearing the way to build a wall on the border. Unfortunately he already sold off all the materials for the wall last year.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/myorkas-cites-immediate-need-wave-regulations-build-border-wall-texas-immigration-surges
I fucking LOVE that the bleeding heart dems are landing on:
- too many migrants, we cant afford this
- social safety nets and welfare programs are stressed
- we need to suspend the goodies because the migrants are too expensive
- we need to build a wall on the southern border...
Seriously, the Babylon Bee doesn't even have to write this shit, its just served to them on a platter
Maybe Fatass should have built that border wall after all.
But he failed on that too.
Your Democrat friends and allies had more than a little something to do with that, Shrike.
the irony of course being the buttplugs of the world (and congress) who declared it racist, xenophobic, a waste of money, and also fought him every step of the way to keep it from happening are going to have to use the same solution in the end.
This is why people dont listen to your kind about economics, immigration, or really any matter that should be left to adults. Your cult like magical thinking isn't very helpful when pragmatic solutions are needed.
The more you post here the more obvious it is how little you understand how government works.
It's odd how Obama/Pelosi pushed through the ACA with the narrowest of Dem margins in 2010 but Donnie couldn't get his signature and much less costly border wall with solid GOP majorities during his first term.
Maybe it is you and Fatass who don't understand how government works. If you did we would have that goddamn wall.
And again shows how little he understands of congress.
For you shrike.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2010/03/10/obamacare’s-procedural-fraud-on-the-american-people/
Maybe it is you and Fatass who don’t understand how government works. If you did we would have that goddamn wall.
The wall is there, maybe if you guys stopped cutting holes in it it would work.
Turn yourself in for your crimes against children.
The TDS-addled turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
I figured out why sarc defends you now. You make him look semi intelligent by comparison.
We all know that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
He understands fine. He’s just a lying psychopath.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Nobody here buys your bullshit, pedo.
I fucking LOVE that the bleeding heart dems are landing on:
– too many migrants, we cant afford this
– social safety nets and welfare programs are stressed
– we need to suspend the goodies because the migrants are too expensive
– we need to build a wall on the southern border…
It's funny what happens when reality pops up and smacks them right in the face.
Was hoping that would link to South Park, was not disappointed.
Mayorkas needs to be arrested, stripped of US citizenship and deported back to Cuba.
Only 1.5 percent of them are in NYC, whereas they have 2.3 percent of the nation's population. So, they need to do their fair share and take in more.
The overwhelming majority of Reps who voted to oust McCarthy were Democrats, who were only interested in caysing chaos for GOP majority and gave zero desire to promote budgetary restraint. The question for the budget hawks is, do you have a practical plan to get what you want or are you just making anything unworkable?
I’d argue they can’t even remotely agree on what they want in the first place. That’s my question to the republicans coming out against this. What was the big conservative big meal ticket Gaetz just tore up? It doesn’t seem like there was any plan at all, past “try and tone down the democrats spending plan by a few billion and hope no one in your constituency finds out,
Now I totally think their plan will be “make this blow up in Gaetz face”. And he has to know that. But IDK. It’s pissing off all the right people.
The meal ticket was stealing more money from Americans to launder through Ukraine, which has long been Mickey's highest value
Um, no. I just do not see how this helps. It does not change the political situation that there is a razor thin majority for the GOP. This seems to be tantrum when at a decidedly strategic disadvantage. And again, most of the reps supporting McCarthy’s ouster are not fiscal hawks, so that is not the real reason he is out. Goetz has no real plan to get what he allegedly wants.
I object to your opposition to Ukraine based on your insistence to justifying it based on anti-Ukrainian bigotry and simping for strong man Putin. You bootlick authoritarians, as long as they are foreign and anti-American.
Wait, your position on funding Ukraine is based off Nardz?
So Republicans should just accept betrayals from their leadership and follow them like lemmings? If getting rid of him over betrayal on funding unlimited weapons to Ukraine isn't the right issue or time, then what/when is?
Sad when even liberal WaPo opinion writer Ruth Marcus begins to realize the legal on attacks Trump are bad before true libertarians like sarc.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/liberal-washington-post-columnist-surprisingly-worries-trump-victim-double-standard-ny-fraud-case
But he's totes not a Democrat. Just ask him, he'll swear.
Amere 16 days after Joe Biden assumed the presidency, top officials in his Justice Department raised suspicion among career IRS agents by demanding a briefing on the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, according to evidence turned over to Congress that raises new questions about Attorney General Merrick Garland's claims of an interference-free probe.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/whistleblowers/new-biden-administration-doj-officials-requested-briefings-hunter
So much for hands off by Garland.
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald Just watch for how often the most influential articles in the NYT and the WPost are 100% built on what “US officials said.”
In the headline, in the text: “according to US officials… US officials warned,” etc.
Once you look for it, it’ll shock you how much is based on this.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1709255645927538892
Whoops. Meant new post here. Meh.
Yup. Its a combination of "people are saying" and actual placed leaks from US intel agencies. Both of which are used to push the narrative of the day
I wonder how long they've been captured for? Since the beginning? Since Watergate? Just the past decade?
Well new york times ran articles praising the starvation in Ukraine in the 20s,
Walter Duranty: the model for the typical NYT reporter.
Happen to be reading a book, in part devoted to the Iranian revolution of '78, wherein the NYT runs articles praising Khomeini as 'surrounded by progressive advisors and dedicated to human rights'.
No, REALLY!
They've always been commies or commie simps, but at some point the US intel agencies decided these commies were no longer the enemy but numerous enough and useful for controlling the masses.
Yes, exactly. That's what I meant by captured. They were once in thrall to the Soviets, but when did the FBI and CIA take them over?
Dec 26, 1991, presumably.
Always remember that Nixon wasn't taken down by Woodward & Bernstein. They were just the stenographers for a member of the secret police (Mark "Deep Throat" Felt, of FBI COINTELPRO) upset that Nixon didn't pick him as J. Edgar Hoover's successor.
It's pretty obvious that the FBI and CIA got rid of Kennedy, Agnew and Nixon for threatening their game. Johnson, Ford, Reagan and especially Bush Sr. were their guys. I don't think Carter was, but he wasn't a threat either. After H.W. it was smooth sailing until Trump.
So revealing massive lawbreaking by White House staff was just a plot to get rid of Nixon? That's actually plausible - but you're ignoring that there would not have been anything to reveal if he hadn't hired a "dirty tricks" team, then either approved of them doing burglaries, or made sure to avoid knowing what they did.
"A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary."
Reason's most principled libertarian chemjeff says anyone claiming to be nonbinary really is nonbinary. Even 7-year-olds.
#YouEitherBelieveSelfIDOrYouDont
"men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary"
Has anyone arrested the bigot who wrote this, for misgendering. I have been trained by my betters that when someone says they are X gender, they ARE X gender, end of story. Weird that now they are "claims"
It was darkly amusing when some claimed mass shooter Anderson Lee Aldrich “isn’t reeeeeeeeally nonbinary” because “we can all tell he’s male just by looking.”
By that standard, degenerate luggage thief Sam Brinton isn’t nonbinary either.
The narrative is the most important thing until its no longer useful.
Wondering if/when the "All men who say they are women are women, and should be able to compete in women's sports" and "We need to have Title IX to protect women" ouroboros will actually devour itself. I can only assume its when the number of Lia Thomas copycats abusing the system hits critical mass and girls are just getting wrecked left and right to the point enough people throw in the towel because its too embarassing to watch
Entire events that are nothing but men in women's clothing competing with each other.
As I said above, it's amusing to watch what happens when reality smacks them in the face... and what happens when they're forced to play by their own rules, like "if someone says they are X gender, they ARE X gender." Of course, they'll just ignore and/or change the rules on a whim. It's all just one big game of Calvinball to them.
the Bud Light chick is pretty obviously a dude at all times too. don't even get me started on Mr. Wheaties
Yeah, there aren't even that many full on trannies who can really pass. I've never seen anyone claiming "non-binary" whose sex wasn't obvious.
It's getting more common on actors' IMDb bios. The lead from that enormous flop The Flash is apparently a "they / them."
At best, some of the obviously female "they / thems" just look like butch lesbians.
At some point, you have to wonder if they're just puting in these "they/them" "non-binary" pronouns just to get an acting gig from a woke/progressive director and producer.
So, women in tech are transphobes, it seems.
These are the rules the Woke have created in abandoning reason and objective reality. Now they have to live with them.
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
What the EU is doing is exactly what neoliberals did in the US and UK after 2016: looked at the 2 election losses they suffered (Brexit and Trump) and concluded they can't allow a free internet any more: too dangerous.
Read about the EU censorship law:
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1709249697431388530
They erroneously think that by shutting people up they will get their way and be able to run roughshod over everyone who opposes them. They're going to be in for quite the shock when reality ensues.
It isnt censorship as long as one person in a remote forest can tell a bear next to him the story. - Mike
Is that bear in a trunk?
This is a libertarian bear. Won't be held down in trunks.
It has to be a polar bear that hasn't eaten in a month.
I wonder how much longer Koch will tolerate the comments for? Will he shut them down or fund more Jeffs and Shrikes?
But the stopgap funding bill runs out roughly a month from now, and this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute—if they manage to meet their deadline at all.
Poor naive Liz. They had 8 months to pass the bills and did not. They will not do so in 45 days even with a speaker.
"will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute"
I don't know, she's probably right about this.
Problem is that was always their plan.
Well yeah.
And seeing as committees are still active...
No vote for speaker should be held until all 1e bills are ready to be introduced.
"The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment."
I can think of a better way.
I hear in China they have the camps for people where they a feed and housed, and pay it back by working for the ccp, or donating an organ...
https://twitter.com/knrd_z/status/1709805236116693325?t=Ga4lzszx5Mzv29feqx7WVA&s=19
In civil wars, people who internalize its master narrative structure are most susceptible to violence. They don't realize what causes violence on the ground: resentment, rivalry, criminality, opportunism, grievance, not ideology or artificial 'sides'. Seems relevant lately
"But I'm on your side!" You can find these cries in the primary sources for every documented civil war, no matter the time, place, or ideologies. Force all the world into ten-thousand foot abstractions and you're bound to misunderstand human nature, which can be fatal
We’re on your side!
“The greatest thing to come out of the BLM movement is this video right here:”
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1709762078083358922
Bipartisan CBO report in 1999 on the budget surplus with a forecast for ten more years of surpluses (that morons claim didn't exist):
CBO is now projecting budget surpluses that are
much larger than those it projected last August, when
CBO published its previous economic and budget outlook. Cumulative surpluses over the 1999-2008 period are $745 billion higher. Legislation enacted since
August—primarily the Omnibus Consolidated and
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act—lowers
projected surpluses by $51 billion over that period.
Changes in factors other than legislation and the
economic outlook increase projected surpluses by
$448 billion over the 1999-2008 period. A variety of
those so-called technical factors raise projected revenues by almost $160 billion and reduce mandatory
spending by nearly $185 billion (excluding debtservice savings) over that period. A substantial reduction in projected spending for Medicare and smaller
reductions in several income security programs are
only partially offset by increases in projected Medicaid costs
.
The Budget Outlook
Under CBO’s baseline assumptions, the first total
budget surplus since 1969 will be followed by even
larger surpluses in the next 11 years. The surplus
grows from $70 billion (0.8 percent of GDP) in fiscal
year 1998 to $107 billion (1.2 percent of GDP) in
1999 (see Summary Table 3). Those projections assume that discretionary spending will equal the statutory caps of the Deficit Control Act and that policies
affecting other spending and revenues will remain unchanged. If discretionary spending increases at the
rate of inflation after the caps expire in 2002, the surplus will reach $381 billion (2.8 percent of GDP) in
2009, compared with $514 billion (3.8 percent of
GDP) if discretionary spending is instead held to the
dollar level of the 2002 caps after that year.
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/106th-congress-1999-2000/reports/eb0199.pdf
Wingnuts all cry -- IT WARE'NT A REAL SURPLUS! NOT BILL CLINTON!
Before we all tear you apart, and point out you didn’t read your source again, do you want to clarify what your troll is exactly?
Yeah, I know.
the CBO is lying/wrong/partisan/lefty/deepstate/Jewy/globalist/blahblahblah.
I was pretty clear, what is your troll here? Jesse thinks you’re trying to pretend that the debt didn’t increase under Clinton. Is that it?
I have admitted that national debt increased many times. I have explained why surpluses caused that.
Jesse is a financial ignoramus as are all the "Clinton didn't have a surplus" morons.
Clinton and Obama were the only two presidents in my lifetime that worked to reduce annual deficits. Period. Give Bubba the credit and stop lying.
There's a difference between the the deficit and the total debt, idiot.
Deficit: The amount you spend more than you collect in taxes/tariffs/fees. Yes, that shrank, but was not eliminated in the 1990s, especially after the Republicans took the House in 1994.
Total Debt: The total amount you owe, regardless of your deficit. This still grew in the Clinton years.
Maybe if you took the time to retake Econ 101, you might understand something. Of course, Shrike, you probably can't even balance your checkbook.
He is hilariously ignorant of all things macroeconomics. Its like talking to a freshman econ 101 student that is getting a C in the class
Should I tell shrike about how CBO makes projections and what assumptions they have to use per their construction?
Well, let's look at what CBO said in the same report:
In CBO’s forecast, real economic growth, which was
3.7 percent in calendar year 1998, falls to 2.3 percent
in 1999 and 1.7 percent in 2000 (see Summary Table
2).
They forecast a slowing economy.
Once again, the truth is the opposite of what dumb-fuck Jesse is implying (that growth is wildly exxagerrated).
You keep proving your ignorance buddy. Go do some research and learn the rules CBO has to abide by.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Total Debt: The total amount you owe, regardless of your deficit. This still grew in the Clinton years.
I acknowledge that the debt grew during the surplus years, you dumb fuck.
Once AGAIN, Social Security SURPLUSES must be used (by statute) to buy US Treasuries. You dumb fucks don't understand double-entry accounting.
We could run a $10 trillion annual surplus and debt would still increase.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
Then you might just want to stop with your silly and false claims.
Quick rule of thumb: when in a hole, stop digging.
Shhh. I'm making a killing selling him new shovels.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
And here he's asking someone else to 'stop lying'?! Stuff it up your ass, turd.
Lol. You admit I’m right but continue to list reasons you’re wrong as being right. Amazing.
"...Jesse is a financial ignoramus as are all the “Clinton didn’t have a surplus” morons..."
See? Told ya: turd lies.
You should be aware that if you take in MORE than you SPEND (a surplus), it'd be mathematically impossible to INCREASE debt.
another moron who doesn't understand double-entry accounting...
The Medici invented it. I know conservatives lag behind but 600 years is absurd.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
You're using terms that you do not understand. Double-entry accounting has nothing to do with whether one is spending more money than he takes in (deficit) and will record (usable for an audit) what the total debt is. It's a method for detecting errors and fraud.
Feel free to explain, in what universe, a SURPLUS INCREASES DEBT.
One thing increases debt. MORE debt.
So, either there was NOT a balanced budget (there was not, mind you) or you're a mathematical imbecile.
Correction, I need to embrace the power of "and" more. You're an imbecile AND there was not a balanced budget. Unless you go along with "Well, it is balanced if we do not include these charges" ---- which, by default, makes it not balanced.
So, either there was NOT a balanced budget (there was not, mind you) or you’re a mathematical imbecile.
Shrike's a mathematical imbecile in any case.
The CBO is literally wrong on every fucking projection dumbass.
Because the Bushpigs fucked up the fiscal situation, dumbass.
It goes further back than that, dumbass. Let's talk Lyndon Baines Johnson.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
You just keep proving how retarded you are dont you? Dot com bubble didnt burst because of Bush.
It was because Bush the Idiot "spent like a drunken sailor" - (John McCains words), you dumb GOP bootlick.
The TDS-addled turd, ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Keep doubling down on retard shrike.
For a guy who claims to hate Bush, you sure shill his policies a lot. Anyway, your man Barry came along and made Bush look like a pinch-penny... and he didn't have an economic collapse, war for oil or global pandemic to blame it on.
You are still retarded about this?
Debt increased every year under Clinton.
Government: we will get 20B in tax revenues and spend 20M
Reality: we got 19B in tax revenue and spent 19.5M
Shrike: Budget surplus!
Debt went up every year. And the very year he left the dot com bubble popped.
How fucking retarded are you shrike?
"How fucking retarded are you shrike?"
However turd replies, it will be a lie. turd lies.
I love that you continue to try to give Clinton the win (just like with Obama) when it was a REPUBLICAN HOUSE that crafted, voted, and passed those budgets that reduced the deficit.
Nevermind that it was a budgetary gimmick and the DEBT increased every year of Clinton’s presidency.
Public Enemy Number One for Joe Biden’s door-battering FBI thugs is still the Generic Trump Voter
"“The federal government believes that the threat of violence and major civil disturbances around the 2024 U.S. presidential election is so great that it has quietly created a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter: Donald Trump’s army of MAGA followers,”
“The challenge for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the primary federal agency charged with law enforcement, is to pursue and prevent what it calls domestic terrorism without direct reference to political parties or affiliations — even though the vast majority of its current ‘anti-government’ investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek.”
They really do view anyone who isn't with them and doesn't believe what they believe as the enemy. Does the Left really want to start civil strife or a civil war? They need to be careful what they wish for as they might just get exactly what they want.
The FBI is fully rogue, an enemy of the constitution and in actual insurrection against the United States of America.
At this point, I'm suspicious of ANY Republican who does not move to disband the FBI.
https://twitter.com/leslibless/status/1709768265529020581?t=7LQrtJ6QDNACSUC8X11fzQ&s=19
The Army vs Navy game scheduled for Dec 9 at Gillette Stadium is turning into a clusterfuck for military veterans and families, because they’re being pushed out of the local hotel rooms, and having their booked reservations cancelled, so illegal aliens can live there!! Unacceptable!
Our local army/navy base has the equivalent flag football game the night before. Last year my son played for the navy and they won a squeaker, 28-26.
Trouble in paradise for Buttplug and Jeff.
Satanists Turn On Leader Over Transgenderism After He Takes Photo With ‘Ex-Woke’ Atheist
"David Silverman frequently posts about his skepticism of transgender ideology."
Or..."even man who poses with statue of part goat, part angel, part man thinks transgender ideology is a bit much"
Gays and black people are sacred, and the most significant part of American history!
https://twitter.com/SecDebHaaland/status/1708897679898521725?t=-35bZQDwKxvfQHWFb10aNQ&s=19
To celebrate LGBT History Month, I joined outdoor advocate and climate movement icon @pattiegonia to discuss how places like @StonewallNPS help tell our country’s full and honest story.
[Video]
House Democrats intend to nominate New York's Hakeem Jeffries, but that is unlikely to go anywhere, given the Republican majority.
I hope not, Jeffries is an insurrectionist lying asshole.
On the Republican side, Louisiana's Steve Scalise and Ohio's Jim Jordan have announced that they are running.
Jordan could be an interesting choice, given his willingness to go after the Bidens.
Some have offered former President Donald Trump as a possibility, citing the fact that one does not actually have to be a sitting member of the House to serve as speaker. Trump has expressed some interest in the idea.
Would make Democrats' heads explode. Might be rather fun to watch no matter what happens. It would also mean that Trump would be 2nd in line for the Presidency should something happen to both Biden and Harris. That would probably make Democrats go totally bonkers (as they weren't enough already).
Arnold Schwarzenegger for speaker?
Not a fan, but that would modify the Presidential line of succession as Schwarenegger was not born a US citizen. Patty Murray (D-Washington) would be next in line then after Harris.
I also like "He's the most popular Republican in the country".
Amongst who? Democrats?
He is an absolute piece if shit.
So Biden has a speech call half of Americans the enemy, sics the doj and irs on political oppenets, and then complains about a toxic atmosphere?
There is nothing so bad that can happen to a progressive that they don't deserve it
https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1709926191849676959?t=9jlDCgQ3MIoQQGUzwYPKAA&s=19
El Paso today.
It's an invasion.
[Video]
Because why not at this point, but more importantly Trump overvalued his house in estimates.
Biden Nominates Hunter Biden's Former Colleague To Lead Office of the Special Counsel
Dellinger and Hunter worked together at the white shoe law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. In 2014, Hunter Biden tapped Boies Schiller Flexner to represent Burisma Holdings.
they are just bragging now
Could you imagine if Trump had introduced a colleague of Don Jr's as Special Counsel? One that had done work for Trump Ruffin Tower LLC?
The papers would have gone mental.
https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1709920684753780936?t=HynGZmLS4aXun_EauNE6ow&s=19
According to the US Consumer Product Safety commission, more children are killed by 5 gallon buckets every year than unarmed black men killed by police
[Link]
So, what's next, banning 5-gallon plastic buckets from Menards and Home Depot?
How else can poor and mentally ill women afford an abortion?
Her bucket her choice.
All 5 gallon buckets must come with holes drilled in the bottom.
Lowe's gets a pass because they're Blue?
Don't have Lowe's in town, so I often forget they exist. It's Menards/Home Depot/Ace near me.
Amazing how effective that propaganda has been.
Meanwhile, you can't talk about the real threat to young black men. The main outcome of all the BLM stuff seems to be more dead black men as crime and gang violence increases.
Number one killer of young black men is the Drug War.
Yes, the WOD and the social problems it has caused or exacerbated is certainly responsible for a lot.
https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1709928744989995144?t=uyM_0FJIjERE-86cI_DC8A&s=19
This doesn’t work anymore. These commies aren’t bothered by this. They smile at your anger and demand you maintain decorum.
[Link]
Yeah, there's a reason the left is absolutely shitting its pants about its allies being yeeted out of school boards. Not a big deal to use these kinds of shock tactics at board meetings, but you have to drag the commissars out and create a socially hostile environment for them to the point that they disappear from these institutions.
And this goes back to JFree's observation that "voting" is, in the modern practice, actually an abandonment of civic duty. it's not enough to just vote, you have to be directly and intensely involved in the minutiae of your local community, because that's the currently breeding ground for a lot of this rad-left bullshit. Volunteer for community boards, run for city council and the school board, attend meetings.
The left has woken up to this now, and is telling their people the same thing, so you can't just assume the fight's over if you get a couple of extra people on the school board. You have to play both offense AND defense; leftism thrives on voluntary acquiescence, and doesn't do well in conditions of sustained resistance. But if you want them to go away, you have to be ready to hit back twice as hard and be very, VERY stubborn when they run the full-court press in their takeover efforts, and afterwards to gatekeep and prevent their entryism.
"Football" aka "soccer"
https://twitter.com/wayotworld/status/1709919721280127445?t=G6aF5Ao3PfSspjLGDcR1DA&s=19
Football legend Kevin Keegan (pictured below) is in hot water today, after saying he thinks women should not be pundits for the men's game. Of course, he's right (no one actually *wants* women in men's spaces except leftists), but he's probably going to get cancelled over this, because football is a key cultural battleground for the globalists. Let me explain.
When Keegan was still playing football in England in the 1980s, both the game and the country were very different. Hard to believe, but it was a time before teams even had sponsors on their shirts! English football was a game for men, and it was almost entirely for *English* men. It was a time before the rabid feminism, diversity quotas, and fake gender confusion of today. It was long before we had heard of 'white privilege' and we could feel good about being English in our homeland. We had a real and positive sense of identity. Like every other country, we had problems, but they were our problems to sort out in our own way.
How things have changed. The 'English' Premier League now frequently has matches without a *single* English player on the pitch. The vast amounts of money in the game are now more important than the game itself, and the top teams now have more 'fans' living in the third world than in England. The teams are now owned by foreign billionaires and corporations, and make most of their money in overseas markets. As English players have become a minority in their own football league, multiculturalism has seen the English people become a minority in their first two cities of London and Birmingham. More cities will follow this trend.
And, as English men are increasingly marginalised in the workplace and academia, women's football has gone from being an irrelevance to being pushed down our throats at every opportunity. Of course, right after the 'Lionesses' were thrust into the media spotlight, they were attacked by that same media for being too white! Football, like everything else in today's world, is now a tool for pushing the anti-male, antiwhite, globalist agenda, where national borders are irrelevant and becoming English is a simple matter of climbing into a dinghy.
As our standard of living is deliberately lowered by the traitors who rule over us, expect the divisions in society to widen and rip England apart. Multiculturalism and feminism have been pushed on us for this reason, and the rampant diversity in football is there to make us cheer for the end of our own nation. I stopped cheering a long time ago, and I suggest you do the same.
President Joe Biden called on lawmakers Wednesday to fix the "poisonous atmosphere in Washington"
But hw will never, ever, call on Chuckles to actually bring up a budget bill in the senate.
"Pelosi Evicted: McCarthy Reportedly Taking Office Space After Ouster Vote"
[...]
"McCarthy will move into Pelosi’s Capitol office, Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.) told Axios.
Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) sent an email about 90 minutes after McCarthy was booted on Tuesday ordering Pelosi and former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) to vacate their secondary offices located near the House chamber, according to Axios, which reported that the email noted the locks would be changed on the doors Wednesday..."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-evicted-mccarthy-reportedly-taking-office-space-after-ouster-vote/ar-AA1hHdcV
Delightful. Couldn't happen to a better person.
The important question is why didn’t McCarthy kick the ghoul out when he took over?
The office is for the prior speaker. Which is now Mccarthy
Ah, thanks.
all former Speakers need time to get the classified documents to the garage.
Which Pelosi knew and was hoping would be ignored because Pelosi.
Is it not odd that Letitia James, the prosecutor, is allowed to discuss the Trump case publicly via social media --- but Trump, the defendant, cannot?
Seems quite backwards.
As much as you hate leftist judges, you do not hate them NEARLY enough.
The West really needs a judges trial a la Nuremberg when the smoke dissipates.
The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment.
It's entirely coincidental that under the precept of "no taxation without representation" that the next step will be allowing these "migrants" to vote. They are illegal aliens after all and "economic refugee" is not a valid category for asylum seekers so I'm not sure how this isn't a straight up open borders argument. Of course, as our most pro-union President ever, there's no way Joe Biden would ever approve of importing so many potential low-wage workers no matter how much experience they may have in building batteries or windmills or gathering unicorn farts.
"The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment."
Naah. It's too move the 'migrants' into those locations most supportive of their 'migration'. You want it? You pay for it.
OR -
The best way out of this is to move (illegal border crossers) migrants away from the USA.
much of the U.S. government's debt is tied up in short-term bonds which periodically 'roll over' into new bonds with updated interest rates. As a result, higher interest rates mean higher interest payments—and those funds come directly out of the federal budget, leaving less revenue for everything else the government might aspire to do.
I'd rather see them spend all their money on debt servicing than what they spend it on now. That would be a major improvement.
If you have to borrow more money to make the minimum payments on your existing debt, technically you're already broke.
If one believes the legacy media, there is absolutely no work getting done by the House because the House hasn't elected a new Speaker. While the Constitution says the House "shall" elect a Speaker, it doesn't address what happens if no speaker is elected. In fact, if one were to go around the House office buildings today, you'd find that 435 congressmen were doing just about business as usual: handling constituent services, meeting with rent seekers, attending to committee business, lining up cozy lunch dates with colleagues, trading favors, and seeing what lobby cocktail parties would be most beneficial to show up at this evening.
Except for voting on legislation, the business of screwing the citizens goes on.
the business of screwing the citizens goes on.
That's guaranteed to continue pretty much no matter what.
What?! Crazy talk! Why even have a state in the first place if it's not going to be used to boss people around?
this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute
Gosh it raises the likelihood that they'll pass an omnibus from 99.9% to 99.95%! Honestly, if Gaetz hadn't done this, do you really think anything about the budget would be being discussed right now? Aside from Republicans need to be more responsible and pass the Democrats' omnibus proposal in a month and a half? Even Massie, who I generally respect, was palming off the last round of GOP budget capitulation under the premise that it included automatic spending cuts. Spending cuts that, surprise, surprise, never actually materialized.
The DC GOP Establishment is fully in bed with the DC Democratic Establishment. They know they have to pretend otherwise for the voters back home. This really shouldn't be a surprise. People whose status and prospects are dependent on the size and centralization of the state want a large and centralized state. The only way you're ever going to fix anything is to disrupt that status and prospect.
My only complaint about Gaetz is that he didn't create enough chaos.
Massie talks a good game but he still supports the status quo when it matters.
^^^
Down with the gerontocracy
Consider this choice: A government of Ron Pauls or a government of AOCs.
Age isn't the issue.
This "down with the gerontocracy" is a clever way of criticizing Biden without criticizing Biden-- or Feinstein. It's a way of kind-of-sort-of acknowledging that Biden is in steep cognitive decline, while casting a wide net of criticism over all people in the age range of Biden, which Donald Trump is. It's the bowf-sideziest of the bowf-sidez argument.
Ron Paul for Speaker of the House.
>>B called on lawmakers Wednesday to ... get their act together.
Brandon and Vlad-Z need studio time to record their C.R.E.A.M. cover.
No question, I would speed for cracks and weed
The combination made my eyes bleed
No question, I would flow off and try to get the dough all
Stickin' up white boys in ball courts
If you don’t get it, “white boys in ball courts” refers to US tax payers in this version.
no no it was good w/o explanation.
Don’t discount how dense some people here are.
>>makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute
the assholes were going to fucking do it anyway. pan et circenses.
surprised SBF gets a trial when Epstein didn't
Who says he's going to survive until the trial ends?
>>Bring your (non-R-rated) questions for our guest.
was Porky's underrated?
"XXX isn't R. Now you've learned to be specific."
But Biden... UR the poisonous atmosphere in Washington. American Rescue Plan, Inflation Reduction Act, Extended Paycheck Protection, Extending Relief Extension Act, etc, etc, etc, etc - endlessly.
>>I actually am coming around to the idea that Democrats should nominate ...
Armand Domalewski, write better.
"In a statement, Adams said the city’s right to shelter obligation “was never intended to apply to the extraordinary circumstances our city faces today.”"
LOL. Imagine, these people when putting forward a truly retarded policy. They, or people around them, never seem to ask..."OK, but what if its not just 100 people...what about 1000 people...10,000 people...1,000,000 people?..." or "do you think a policy like this might have unintended consequences?"
It really is like giving a young female child a magic wand and saying "OK, you can do whatever you want!"
"...It really is like giving a young female child a magic wand and saying “OK, you can do whatever you want!”"
"Free" medical care!
>>Donald Trump’s army of MAGA followers
suits, red armbands, orange wigs ...
The best way out of this is to move migrants away from dependence on social services and toward gainful employment.
This is some fucking top shelf libertarian wishcasting. Top shelf.
1) He's likely the most popular Republican politician in America
?!!
My Companion mother makes 55 bucks an hour on the PC(Personal PC). She has been out of w0rk for quite some time however last month her check was 11,000 bucks only w0rking on the PC(Personal PC) for 9 hours per day.
OPEN>>>>>>bitecoinsallar12.COM
He probably meant the most popular Republican politician in the part(s) of America that count.
IOW, the large coastal cities populated by people who think and act just like him.
A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary.
Rooster in the henhouse.
That particular henhouse was so full of roosters, apparently, that there wasn't any room left for the hens.
If you identify as a hen, you're a hen.
I'm pretty sure that was the rules last week.
A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary.
Keep it neutral, Reason, keep it neutral.
Helen Joyce, on the other hand...
"this distraction makes it more likely that legislators will again pass an omnibus at the last possible minute"
This "distraction" will do nothing whatever to change the failure of Congress to do its job. It would be wise for Reason writers to keep the cause of Congressional dysfunction front and center instead of constantly trying to "distract" readers with red herrings - a fight over budgeting and spending authorization procedures centering on the Speakership - from our feeling that a government shutdown would actually be a GOOD thing at this point!
"A tech conference meant for women . . . "
Who would sponsor such a blatently sexist conference?
I want names so I can mount a boycott!
Whoever rented them the conference center should be boycott as well. Bake that cake bitch.
"A tech conference meant for women was overrun by men who got in by claiming to be nonbinary."
There is no such thing as "claiming" to be nonbinary.
If they say they are, then they are. It is not a claim, it is a fact.
(Even if it is just for the duration of a conference)
This is correct. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one reading the fucking source material around here. It's nice to know at least one other person does.
I think the deal is, anyone can be non-binary if they say so, but it doesn't really count if you don't make a big deal about it on social media.
It is interesting how, after it biting them on the ass, they quickly go back against the idea of rejecting the existence of an objective reality with regards to gender identity. They may even have to define what a woman is in a non-circular reference!
Consistency is not something they care about. The aim is only to be disruptive.
So they scheduled a tech conference for biological women only?
In this day and age? What did they think would happen?
Britain's prime minister says the smoking age should start at 18 and rise by one year, every year, up until nobody can buy them.
This is a direct assault on the American colonies.
They are still bitter about losing in Virginia.
If Biden is so worried about Democrats voting out the Speaker of the House, why didn't he tell them not to?
If Republicans are so worried that one Congressman can call for a no-confidence vote, how about nominating someone who a majority of the Congress has confidence in?
With more than 122,700 asylum seekers having come through our intake system since the spring of 2022, and projected costs of over $12 billion for three years, it is abundantly clear that the status quo cannot continue
$12B/3 = $4B/year/122,700 people = $35,492/person/year.
I am going to hope I am missing something.
Also of note, ran in the opposite direction of the love of his life, which would have left the attacker free rein to stab her to death. Stupid, terrible instincts, and a coward.
As you said, guy was half his size. Knife or not, its do or die, your wife is there with you, real men make it work. This was a soyboy through and through.
https://twitter.com/UsingLyft/status/1709918130930119070?t=pV5cXXpl4fa7Sb2_PpC-uw&s=19
The fact that guy who stabbed him wasn’t even a homeless schizo but someone who was working in the public school system is just mind boggling
That was his first face-to-face confrontation of his entire life. Having never considered actual self-defense, he didn't have a clue what to do.
Is it wrong to call this one of the more Darwin-esque of Darwin Awards?
Earn money in USA, high scores from trusted resources. Work at your own pace. Regular Payments. Search in different job categories. Work anywhere on your vs03 computer, laptop or mobile phone. Update your profile at any time.
.
.
Detail Here———->>> http://Www.Smartcash1.com
The person who posted the video when I first saw it commented something along the lines of “This video has a great ending”. Unaware of the context, I assumed the big white guy was going to just lay him out.
Does it have English teeth?