Thomas Massie: 'The Next Speaker Is Going To Go Back to the Old Testament'
The libertarian-adjacent Kentucky congressman says he's against the effort to depose Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

(UPDATE: The House of Representatives voted 216-206 on Tuesday afternoon to remove Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.) as speaker of the House, with eight Republicans voting in favor of his dismissal. It is the first time in U.S. history that a sitting speaker has been ousted in this manner. The position will remain vacant until a majority of the House votes to appoint a new speaker.)
Ahead of what could be a dramatic afternoon in the House of Representatives, Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) occupies an unusual and possibly unique position.
Massie is the closest thing to a libertarian that you'll find in the House and a frequent ally of the right-wing Freedom Caucus—some members of which are aiming to topple Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) in a vote that could come this afternoon. But in an interview with Reason on Tuesday morning, Massie offered a defense of McCarthy's speakership, and he warned that the Republican rebels might not understand the damage they would do by firing him.
"In many ways, this is a referendum on whether the House is going to try regular order or not, because the next speaker—if Kevin is deposed today—is not going to say 'oh, if only we had tried more regular order, this could have worked out,'" Massie told Reason. "The next speaker is going to go back to the Old Testament…and we're going to devolve to the former method, which was an omnibus bill every year and gang warfare to try and get your thing in the omnibus bill."
For Massie—and for anyone who wants to see Congress budget more responsibly— regular order is a big deal. Effectively, that means that Congress should bring each of its 12 annual spending bills to the floor via the process that everyone learns in civics class: with committees voting on what to include in each, then amendments, and debate on the House floor before a final vote. Congress hasn't correctly completed that process on time since 1996.
As part of the compromise McCarthy reached with the House Freedom Caucus in January, he agreed to go back to that system.
He's been criticized for failing to follow through. While there are certainly personal issues involved in Rep. Matt Gaetz's (R–Fla.) attempt to dump McCarthy from the speakership, some of Gaetz's criticism is focused on McCarthy's unwillingness to send single-subject bills to the House floor.
Gaetz filed the motion to vacate—a rarely used procedural tool that allows the full House to vote to remove a speaker—after McCarthy suspended the rules to bring a continuing resolution to the House floor on Sunday to prevent the government from shutting down. The bill passed with support from Democrats and against the objections of the Freedom Caucus.
Massie voted against the continuing resolution but said Tuesday it was "the least worst of a bunch of bad options." If the House bill hadn't passed, he said, it's likely that a Senate-drafted continuing resolution including a higher level of spending—mostly because of added military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, which was left out of the House measure—would have become law.
McCarthy's defenders argue that he's working to reform the budget process and needs more time to see it through.
Massie points out that McCarthy has allowed two Freedom Caucus members—Reps. Chip Roy (R–Texas) and Ralph Norman (R–S.C.)—onto the Rules Committee. Together with Massie, that's a voting block that can effectively control what bills reach the House floor, something that Massie says would have been unthinkable under previous Republican speakers.
"They have been listening to us and we have been guiding the process," he says.
Norman has also voiced support for keeping McCarthy in charge of the House. "I have been profoundly disappointed in several elements of Speaker McCarthy's leadership, but now is not the time to pursue a Motion to Vacate," he wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter) on Tuesday morning.
If McCarthy survives today's vote, does that mean regular order will prevail and Congress will pass all 12 budget bills before the new continuing resolution expires in mid-November? Massie says there's "a good chance" that will happen.
On the other hand, "if Kevin fails today, we're going to get the Schumer-McConnell special," he says, referring to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R–Ky.), who Massie believes will have the upper hand in any dealings with a leaderless House GOP caucus.
"And it's going to be an omnibus," Massie added, "and it's not going to be pretty."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Doesn't Trump hate Massie?
Just How fvckin simpleminded are you?
Exceptionally. If he wasn't completely retarded his trolling wouldn't be so obvious.
He wanted to throw Massie out of the GOP back in 2020.
And y'all have made it abundantly clear that one can love Trump or hate America. Since Trump don't like Massie, Massie must be wrong.
Isn't that how it works with you guys?
And y’all have made it abundantly clear that one can love Trump or hate America.
Cite your strawman.
I posted a statement from 2022. That is the most recent statement I could find. So again youre ignorant as usual.
Cite my middle finger. I'm not digging up links to prove something to you. You're not that important.
Of course you're not digging up links to prove it. You were lying.
Because you lie about everything.
You still can't seem to get it into your head through the alcohol-induced fog. It's not about Trump, it's about double-standards, the lack of the rule of law, and a total disrespect for the Constitution. Neither Trump nor Massie support the MIC.
Why don't you just set your strawman over there while we torch it.
It’s not about Trump, it’s about double-standards, the lack of the rule of law, and a total disrespect for the Constitution.
Want to know what I actually think? Not what JA or ML have imagined?
The word that comes to mind when I think about the Trump prosecutions is "shameful." Is that where we're at? I remember when they didn't impeach every president. Then they started impeaching every president. So every president can count on being impeached. I think that Trump is just the beginning. Soon every outgoing president, after being impeached, will have to contend with prosecutions as well. Shows how low society has fallen.
Have yet to see you agree with the Biden impeachment inquiry. Have seen you attack people constantly pointing out the graft. So you lie again.
You have also supported the J6 prosecutions often while screaming in age at BLM rioters even being arrested due to unmarked vans.
So again. You continue to lie.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. He makes up what I think, and calls me a liar when I disagree. That same word comes to mind again when I think about the folks who applaud JesseAz.
Lol. Youre so delusional as to be a dictionary example. Need the links for the 50th time of you supporting J6 prosecutions?
"supporting J6 prosecutions"
Anyone who supports the rule of law, supports the J6 prosecutions. The J6 criminals keep getting convicted by juries, so it's not like they didn't have their day in court or an opportunity to defend themselves. Why do you think it's a bad thing that criminals are put in jail?
You don't like the fact that they keep getting convicted, but that and $5 will get you a Starbucks. Your unhappiness is worthless in a court of law. Of course, so is their "I'm just a tourist" defense strategy.
I read what you posted above, not what JA or ML imagined. And yes, this is shameful, the prosecutions and the impeachments. It’s like the ending days of the Roman Republic, and it’s ridiculous. I also have a very bad feeling where this might be headed.
That said, there are valid reasons to impeach a President (Andrew Johnson's could be considered entrapment). Bill Clinton's, IMHO, should've been done as the man committed a felony and did conduct unbecoming a President (or CEO for that matter) when he had an intern do sexual favors for him. That should have been non-partisan.
Likewise, Biden's behavior is truly atrocious in this regard. There is no way this man should've ever even gotten near the Presidency with the payoffs he's gotten from China and Ukraine. I'm sure the Ukraine ones are ongoing, and may be a major reason why he's so keen to keep fighting there.
We could be going through something that will be a chapter heading in a future history book. Who knows. I've done some cursory searches, out of curiosity, of what life might have been like for people living through major events. Like the fall of the Roman Empire. Turns out people just get along with their lives and adjust. It's only in hindsight does anything feel really significant to the average Joe.
Nobody believes you read a history book.
You're worse than a cat begging for food. Back on mute you go.
Finally. I win ML.
"Neither Trump nor Massie support the MIC."
What is the MIC?
Military Industrial Complex.
I'm not sure what the MIC has to do with the rest of it.
"It’s not about Trump, it’s about double-standards, the lack of the rule of law, and a total disrespect for the Constitution."
Since Trump embodies all three of those, it seems like it's exactly about Trump. Or at least about the version of the GOP that Trump has created.
Massie is of course correct in recognizing that women waive individual rights upon successful impregnation by a White Christian Male. Yet even though Massie, Anarco-Smith and Amish Boy are correct on this one issue, McCarthyism is still the cherished American Faith empowered by the First Amendment to compel obedience to Higher Law. McCarthyism must not be sacrificed on the altar of the dog-eat-dog individualism so roundly rejected by the Holy Father of Rome.
Massie won Trump’s endorsement Tuesday ahead of the Bluegrass State’s primary election next week. In a statement, Trump referred to the libertarian-minded congressman as a “Conservative Warrior” and a “first-rate Defender of the Constitution.”
No.
Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie says ‘Trump is at fault’ for deadly riot at Capitol
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/09/rep-thomas-massie-says-trump-is-at-fault-for-deadly-riot/6611721002/
How can you stand this guy? You must hate him on general principle.
He's committed blasphemy. That's unforgivable.
Youre an idiot. Your post.
sarcasmic 36 mins ago Flag Comment Mute User Doesn’t Trump hate Massie?
Present tense. The quote i have is from 2022. Present tense shows he doesn’t hate him.
Trump was wrong for criticizing Massie in 2020 as voice votes are bullshit. (See sarc, easy to show where i disagree with Trump. Something you can’t do with Biden).
But you’re entire post was wrong based on the tense you chose to use. You were wrong. But you sure won’t admit it.
See sarc, easy to show where i disagree with Trump.
Cute.
Something you can’t do with Biden
Go suck a bag of dicks. I disagree with the fool all the time.
Ohhhhh, you mean I have to say it out loud? Type it up for you? Give you a summary every week? Fuck off. When you infer shit from what I don't say, that is purely your imagination. Grow up and fuck off.
Cite one example in any thread critical of Biden. Want to play a game. Find one before I find 10 of you trying to attack conservatives in those threads.
Also do you admit your initial post was wrong?
I don't have a file of bookmarks, loser. And it's entirely possible that Trump hates Massie while campaigning for all fellow Republicans.
Greatest programmer in Maine doesn’t know how to do a website search with the keyword Biden. How cute.
So your bald yet countered assertion has primacy over a public statement showing your bald assertion to be wrong. How cute
I'm not doing research to prove what I know I've said. Especially because I know you're arguing in bad faith. What is wrong with my first statement? Politicians who hate each other campaign for each other all the time for the good of the Party.
I mean we have a perfect example of you knowing what you said being an utter lie.
I just posted this. Does it count as criticism of Biden by your Biblical standards?
https://reason.com/2023/10/03/a-raise-for-auto-workers-may-imperil-bidens-electric-vehicle-ambitions/?comments=true#comment-10259643
Lol. Fucking posted in a thread after being called out. I knew you would do this. And no it doesn’t fuckijg count. You’ve had 3 years to criticize Biden. You refuse to do so, spending all your time deflecting to conservatives or arguing against criticism of Biden.
How fucking pathetic you try this. Timestamps exist retard.
I said "just posted" you imbecile. Your stupidity makes my head hurt.
The bet was on your past criticisms of him retard.
I disagree with the fool all the time.
Those your words? Yes or no? If it is all the time it should be an easy bet shouldn't it? Lol.
There was no bet. I told you I don’t search for your benefit.
Besides, you're arguing in bad faith so I know nothing will be accepted. So why bother?
Please learn what arguing in bad faith fucking means. Misusing words is not an argument.
Libertarian conservative warrior? Is this a thing? I’m speechless.
James Kopp, Robert Dear, Michael Bray and trans-private Shelley Shannon of the Army of God exemplify the Christian conservative warrior ideal imported into the Lootveeg fon Mises party to replace dog-eat-doc Jewish materialist selfishness. Justifiable homicide is replacing suffrage because heroic baby-savers are unjustly branded "convicted felons" to keep them from voting for Trump. The Original Intent of disenfranchisement was to deprive uppity women, hippies, latinos and homosexurals of the vote lest they interfere with the purposes of God's Own Prohibitionists.
Trump has in the past but he endorsed Massie last election. Trump doesn't appreciate Massie's loyalty to the Constitution rather than he.
Sounds reasonable.
LOL. Literally what I told you. Just wow.
As a matter of elementary theology, a Jonah like Trump deserves to see the inside of a whale.
"The next speaker is going to go back to the Old Testament"
The next speaker is going to be Jewish?
Hebrew and Christian Bibles contain different books in a different order.
The order doesn't fucking matter. Learn what the Council of Nicaea was.
You're making my point for me in your failed attempt to look smart.
You really are doubling down on ignorance. Amazing. Order has nothing to fucking do with it. You ignorantly added that.
I really don't know what you're trying to prove, other than I was factually correct when I said "Hebrew and Christian Bibles contain different books in a different order."
The Torah and Tanakh don’t contain different books from the Old Testament, and they don’t have an order, while the Old Testaments order is a publishing tradition, differs by denomination and is not religiously based.
You’re too stupid to troll here. Go try your luck at 9gag. ===>
I just want to get this straight.
When I say “Hebrew and Christian Bibles contain different books in a different order” I am incorrect because the Hebrew and Christian Bibles contain different books in a different order.
Is that about it?
No. They contain the same books. There is no order for the Jews, and the Christian's order varies by denomination.
This isn't hard, Sarckles.
I was wrong. Thank you for correcting me.
Shouldn't you be gloating? Bragging about bookmarking this post to show off how smart you are?
Well hell. I was wrong.
You should start every day from this premise.
I figure 30% or so of what I know to be true is wrong. Just don’t know what. So I can be persuaded and corrected. Unlike you who has never admitted to being wrong to someone you don’t like and never agreed with someone you don’t like. Your childishness is is so childish.
30% is a vast understatement.
Thanks. Non idiots clearly understand how inane sarcs post was.
We talking 10 plagues or Sodom and Gomorragh here?
It's Washington so Sodom is definitely involved.
He could be Philistine, who, contrary to the stereotypical insult, were kin to the Greeks, crafted metal and armor, and were as civilized as anybody was in those days.
The libertarian-adjacent Kentucky congressman says he's against the effort to depose Speaker Kevin McCarthy.
So he is adjacent to Polis and Amash?
With Massie or FROM Massie?
https://twitter.com/VaubanBooks/status/1709182658457031096?t=1Tz40a15SlxqSY99TcH30g&s=19
"The great tragedy of the Great Replacement is the disappearance forever of European ethno-cultural identity.
But its most concrete consequence is the spread of violence, what I call the 'Great Turmoil':
It begins as permanent stress, just under the surface, influencing all of our behavior: alarm systems, getting up at night to make sure the window is closed, accompanying young women to the metro, pretending to be on the phone so as not to be molested, locking the doors of one’s car when driving through certain intersections, not responding to unprovoked insults, worrying when one’s wife or girlfriend does not answer her phone, one’s stomach knotting up when thinking of the squatters who might have taken up residence in one’s grandmother’s house.
Alongside this stress, the Great Turmoil is obviously also reflected in violence – a type of violence that, when it is given vent, is all the more brutal for having overcome all of the guardrails meant to prevent it. Elderly women raped through the night, barbaric crimes every week…
Indeed, the Great Turmoil also characterized the final century of the collapse of Rome. Saint Jerome succinctly describes how, having initially been employed in large agricultural estates or used as slaves by wealthy Romans, the Goths and then the Vandals 'harvested the Roman people' with rape and arson.
In this article (in English), an introduction to the English translation of the work of @RenaudCamus, I thus simply explain that it is here, towards the Great Turmoil, that the Great Replacement is leading us.
And that if we do not act, we shall all very soon pay the price." @pierremarieseve
[Link]
Saint Jerome succinctly describes how, having initially been employed in large agricultural estates or used as slaves by wealthy Romans, the Goths and then the Vandals ‘harvested the Roman people’ with rape and arson.
Turns out the Romans weren't any more capable of mowing their own fucking lawns or cleaning their own houses than post-1970s Americans have been.
Eh, I've mowed my own lawn every year (and my parents' lawn when I was a kid, and neighbors' lawns for money back then, too...) ... always with a push mower, no less ... but I finally did have to hire someone this year due to injuries. I don't mind it if I'm healthy... it's way cheaper to DIY, for one thing.
"the least worst of a bunch of bad options."
Sorry, Massie, but allowing the Congress to continue to pretend that they are not failing miserably to do their constitutional duties or follow their own rules is NOT the "least worst" option here. If Congress refuses to authorize government spending properly, the government should not spend any money until Congress DOES authorize it according to the Constitution.
The fact that a wide range of unconstitutional programs has previously been approved by previous Congresses is NOT an excuse for them to pretend that it would be some kind of disaster if they aren't funded.
Massie is definitely wrong here if it does turn out Mccarthy has a side deal with Biden and Democrats about funding Ukraine.
Isn’t there an agreement to have a separate bill purely for funding Ukraine? Regardless of the outcome of such a bill, it seems to me that considering such a bill separately from a main appropriations bill is a good idea.
No there was no agreement publicly. The only public admittance of it is from Biden. Mccarthy flatly denied the claim. KJP also declined to answer when asking about it.
The agreement in January was regular order and decreases in spending if they did not pass bills. They have now broken that agreement through the CR. They break it with any Ukraine spending bill not offset with other cuts.
Massie is outnumbered 434-1. So maybe you take what little sorta wins you can. Please explain in the actual real Congress that exists what a better outcome would be.
Not negotiating with democrats against the caucus you represent. Sticking to agreements made all the way back in January instead of throwing them out the window to pass another CR while negotiating more funding.
How are any of those items good in your book?
"Not negotiating with democrats against the caucus you represent."
You understand that there has to be negotiation with Democrats, right? Rs have a razor-thin majority in the House and are in the minority in the Senate. A good amount of what the wingnuts want wouldn't even gain support among Rs in the House, let alone Ds in the Senate.
So what would you suggest? Constantly voting on completely useless bills that will never pass? Driving the country into the ground because most people don't agree with far right policies? Sending out single-issue bills that won't pass? Refusing to compromise unless we abandon our allies?
Tell me, Jesse, what do you think needs to happen to pass a budget? Realistically, not what you want to happen. Now that McCarthy is out, what does a passable budget look like?
You missed that entire 2nd part of the sentence dummy.
More dems voted for the CR than GOP did. It continues the level of spending they agreed not to continue.
I'll try to use smaller words for you next time. You seem to be struggling.
"More dems voted for the CR than GOP did."
And? What’s your point? Is this move going to change that?
You seem to think that compromising is a justification for petty revenge, even if that revenge makes your goals even less likely to be achieved.
This isn’t even cutting off your nose to spite your face. It’s actively creating a larger likelihood of failure, by choice.
How does this make it more likely that Matt Gaetz and his merry band of arsonists get what they want?
Massie is a grifting bitch who helped the establishment the only time he could make a difference
Congress dissolves.
The removal of Ukraine funding from the appropriations bill, though, was suggestive at the very least of a separate bill.
Which Biden claimed was already agreed to in a side deal which is the fucking issue.
Wait, compromise? In politics? In a period of divided government? How ... completely normal.
The compromise was making McCarthy speaker and he broke the deal.
So Gaetz and his supporters are going to hold their breath until they turn blue? Are they going to kick and scream?
So a compromise had to be made with Democrats. How is that a surprise? The Senate and White House are controlled by Democrats. There is zero chance that a purely Republican bill will ever make it into law. Compromise was inevitable.
The real issue is that you and Matt Gaetz (R - Moscow) don'w want to provide funding for Ukraine at all and you are afraid that a bill doing so will pass.
Libertarians for interventionist forever-wars!
Lol. Shrike loves him some foreign wars.
It sure is neat that when push comes to shove, Massie is there to lecture us about the lesser weevil. When he ISN'T on the hook for making decision, suddenly he is an ideologue that can be counted on by Reason to provide endless quotes of how bad the GOP is for selling out principle.
Thanks, Massie!
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1709321746673786896?t=PLLQeWbRI1-RVPki7OON8g&s=19
The US added - checks notes - $275 billion in debt in, uh, ONE DAY
Total US debt is now $33.442 trillion, hit $33 trillion just 2 weeks ago, and on pace to rise by $1 trillion in 1 month.
WTF is going on
[Link]
I agree with Rep. Massie that Congress has to get back to regular order. To do that you need to make it a priority. Congress had nine months to put together the appropriation bills and they failed to get it done. The Congress needs to get it priorities straight and no frivolous work until the budget gets done.
The problem here is not that the Congress is distracted by frivolous activities. The problem is that they do not HAVE to get back to regular order. They have gotten away with continuing resolutions and violating their own rules of order for over 25 years because until recently no one has tried to force the issue. Now a few Republicans are finally trying to force the issue. Congress is a very large committee with 435 stomachs and no brain. They can play gang warfare and brinksmanship with debt ceilings and government shutdowns and no one holds them accountable by punishing them for it.
"Now a few Republicans are finally trying to force the issue."
No they aren't. They're all still playing power games and don't give two shits about regular order. They're too busy eating their own to pay attention to any actual principles. If a self-aggrandizing blowhard like Matt Gaetz is the solution, we're all screwed.
Is everything you say just pure leftist bullshit?
When it comes to fiscal policy, none of it is. I'm a fiscal conservative, a capitalist, and an ardent supporter of a balanced budget (and an Amendment requiring it).
I'm also not a partisan, so I'm looking for people who can actually get things done, not self-aggrandizing jackasses like Gaetz who aren't going to get anything accomplished except a huge bump in his campaign fund.
The idea of good governance is that you accomplish what you can, when you can, then saddle up for the next battle. There will never be a sudden, game-cganging moment in politics, especially concerning the budget. It's idiocy to think otherwise.
Ardent supporter of a balanced budget who is applauding CRs and going back on spending cuts.
Yeap. Typical lying lefty shit. Lol.
I never have, and never will, support CRs.
I support regular order. But this isn't going to accomplish that. This is just going to, at best, give those who support balanced budgets a weaker hand. The more likely scenario is that the chaos and infighting will weaken Rs so much they will be unable to mount an effective push for their priorities.
Sometimes "getting things done" means stopping others from FAILING to "get things done." In this case McCarthy failed to cut spending, failed to keep promises to open up the budget process and failed to pass a budget. Stopping him from continuing to kick the can down the street IS "getting things done" in that context.
I want congress in chaos. They eep infighting, there's less opportunity to fuck We the People over.
The best thing would be to ban air conditioning in the Capitol, the House Office Building, and the Senate Office Building.
Might result in some fistfights. 🙂
Good grief. The electorate is the problem. We are a bunch of ignorant sheep, Congress just reflects the stupidity that is modern America. Face it, we are f’ed. Enjoy the ride while you can.
Is this where we agree to disagree, and fun Ukraine anyway?
Having a separate bill to vote on that makes sense, no?
Oust him. Who cares? Gridlock wins.
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1709268893460496545?t=wiN7UM65xkXwAaQUnCs7bQ&s=19
A woke activist was stabbed to death in Brooklyn yesterday.
His friends can’t even talk about what happened because it’s bad PR.
These people are ghouls.
[Link]
Killed by climate change, no doubt.
...He (the deceased) convinced me to write a poem about plastic...
I never knew poems could cure Climate Change™.
32-yrs.-old, stabbed waiting at a bus stop after attending a wedding with a "gal pal".
Are we sure it's not just the fact that the most significant thing in his life is that he got stabbed to death?
https://twitter.com/BIPOCracism/status/1709330090914406425?t=39J3OSM038jUHCcHkTxoZg&s=19
Grows up in predominantly upper class White town. Super effeminate, gets job as a “social justice advocate” and “policy guy” screams about diversity and labels anyone he doesn’t like a “Nazi”
—gets stabbed to death by insane black dude
https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1709381399986233538?t=7GJNnriEmCAoe_hKyAlGQg&s=19
"The police do not protect you. ACAB. BLM."
Ryan Carson's girlfriend Claudia V. Morales is a cop-hating BLM activist. She was at a BLM riot in Boston in 2020, blaming police for violence when they tried to arrest rioters.
[Link]
In Crown Heights, what was he doing imitating Timothy Treadwell?
Massie voted against the continuing resolution but said Tuesday it was "the least worst of a bunch of bad options."
So why did he do that then? Virtue signaling? Pissing in the wind? Inability to deal with what is sometimes a reality - that sometimes bad options are the only options that exist?
Yeah, well, I blame the "traditional Republicans", the kind of people who supported McCain, Bush, and Cheney, for the dysfunction in the GOP. If they think they are going to win elections by continuing to do what they have been doing for decades, they will have a rude awakening.
I'd vote for Biden or Sanders before I vote for one of the Republican "moderate". Why? Because those "moderates" don't accomplish anything and they give the GOP a bad name. At least with people like Biden and Schumer in charge, the blame falls on the right people.
That does explain how they keep cruising to reelection.
"Fuck You, Cut Spending" is the phrase I think you're looking for here. The motion to vacate is pretty much the only weapon "the whacko's" have. I saw a cartoon the other day of Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown with Lucy being labeled "GOP" and Charlie being labeled "GOP Voters" and Lucy telling Charlie something to the effect that this time she won't betray him, she promises. If the next speaker promises to be Biblical, I'm all for it. Flaming swords, hellfire and damnation, rains of frogs and locusts, slaughtering the first-born, the whole bit.
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1709284568358899979?t=z0qrLR526s7o7pbeKHD84Q&s=19
I regret to inform you that the libertarians are at it again
[Link]
I'm sure that will cause a groundswell of support for libertarians! /sarc
Nothing says you take your principles seriously like dousing them in social movements that you just discovered on the internet 10 min. ago.
I mean, it's true. But who the fuck is that supposed to appeal to that isn't already a libertarian or something close to it?
No. It's not true. Trans furry rights are definitively not human rights.
There's no such thing as trans furry rights. But there is such a thing as a right to self defense and a right to use your property as you see fit, even if you are a freak.
Anyway, doesn't everyone hate furries? Doesn't seem like a good strategy.
There is also a right to criticize insanity and mental unhealthiness. Something that the rights at issues tries to disallow.
if I want to defend my weed farm in a rainbow colored fox costume and a rifle who's going to tell me I'm wrong?
Anybody who wants to. Now acting through the state to stop you is wrong. But calling you out is not.
"Now acting through the state to stop you is wrong."
You mean like abortion bans, book bans, bodily autonomy bans, medical decision-making bans, religious choice bans, etc., etc., etc.? Cultural conservatives love coercion by the state, as long as it's doing the right thing (as determined by them).
If I wanted to live like a sanctimonious, self-impressed restrictionist bent on forcing everyone to follow my personal moral beliefs, I would be a cultural conservative. But I don't, so can you please take your self-righteousness and piss off?
Yeap. Just constant lefty ignorant bullshit.
No, that's pure libertarian principles. You leave me alone and I'll do the same. It's about as basic as libertarian ideals get.
No shrike. It is your typical lefty bullshit.
Abortion involves two individuals, not one.
There are no book bans. Leftist lie. School libraries don’t carry every fucking book written.
Covid belies your medical decision. But you’re covering for genital surgeries on minors whom don’t have informed consent, see current lawsuits.
Religious choice bans? Lol. What the actual fick retarded talking point is this.
Again. Youre pushing leftist lies.
"Abortion involves two individuals, not one."
Prove it first. But since an individual has to be capable of sustaining life, you're not going to be able to. Which is why viability is the only reasonable point at which abortion should be banned. The earliest a fetus has ever survived delivery is 21 weeks. Can you agree on that?
"There are no book bans. School libraries don’t carry every fucking book written."
And yet, wingnuts are removing books that were already there and forbidding anyone from replacing them. If it walks like a ban and quacks like a ban ... it's a ban.
"Covid belies your medical decision."
I'm assuming this is another episode of "I'm going to accuse you of positions you've never taken"? Because I have never spoken either way on vaccine mandates, which I assume is what you are referencing.
"But you’re covering for genital surgeries on minors whom don’t have informed consent, see current lawsuits."
I'm not covering for anything. I have no desire to have plastic surgery of any kind. However, as a libertarian I don't think it's an issue the government should be coercing anyone about.
Especially since, unsurprisingly, cultural conservatives don't limit themselves to surgery, but are outlawing things that are completely harmless like changed pronouns, puberty blockers, and other completely (and easily) reversible social and medicinal treatments.
"Religious choice bans? Lol. What the actual fick retarded talking point is this."
I believe that no one should be allowed to project their religious beliefs onto anyone else. Cultural conservatives want Christians to have a separate (and superior) treatment by the law. Our slow descent into theocracy is a terrible thing.
"Again. Youre pushing leftist lies."
Again, I'm pushing libertarian principles. I don't need the government to nanny me. You, apparently, do. Or at least you revel in the government forcing other people to do what you want them to.
Out: Libertarians - Plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
In: Libertarians - Plotting to take over the world, downplay actual rights, and obliquely threaten you to validate even the most abjectly idiotic and destructive of their social policies at the point of a gun.
As long as it satisfies their narcissistic desire to beg for leftist approval while posing as "above" the fray
jfc (R) is industrial level retarded. do one fucking thing right.
For a minute there I thought you were saying that Jesus Fucking Christ is a Republican and retarded.
But yeah, every time I think they might do something worthwhile they remind me how much worse than useless they are.
I mean, scream at the top of your lungs all day about how McCarthy is a (D) plant but if you have a chance to pressure the Senate to make a real play, huddle up and pressure the Senate to make a real play ... I can't even.
The first time Mccarthy was asked to live up to his agreements made to become House Speaker he failed.
yes.
I just called AND emailed my congressman, and asked him to nominate D FRANK ROBINSON for Speaker. Let's make history today!
Massie will be proven right about this as he is about most things.
Massie defending McCarthy?!?!?
Okay, I understand the logic, and it makes sense. But still it's like swallowing mustard flavored oatmeal...
In Jared Polis, more dreamily libertarian than Massie, news. The art of using the federal taxpayer for fun, cool, lit, hipster, Amtrack run federal taxpayer/state taxpayer partnership: TRAINS TRAINS and more TRAINS. I’d guess he’s on the phone with Jerry Brown right about now:
https://www.cpr.org/2023/09/29/polis-wants-billions-for-front-range-rail/
So dreamy.
Matt Gaetz and the other Magnificent Seven form a coalition with all the Democrats to remove the speaker. Didn't know he had bipartisan leanings.
Can't see what this coalition thinks they are going to win. Is Gaetz under some pitiful delusion that even a single Democrat will help him elect whatever Republican he wants, or that the 210 Republicans that stuck are going to reward him for this?
They didn't win anything under Mccarthy. Mccarthy ignored the January agreement for his role. Fuck him.
OK, fuck him. Done, congratulations.
Now what?
You do understand that there are like 8 votes out of 435 to make one of the Gaetz gang speaker. You are not going to get that. It's delusional.
Yeah. But guess what doesn't get passed in the turmoil? More continuing resolutions or Ukraine funding. What Mccarthy agreed to. He didn't live up to his agreement. His ouster does.
"Is Gaetz under some pitiful delusion that even a single Democrat will help him elect whatever Republican he wants"
Matt Gaetz can't do math. Without the small number of wingnuts, the sane Rs can't elect a Speaker. No D is going to help him seat one of his idiot supporters. His "caucus" is about a dozen bomb-throwers who are patting themselves on the back because they brought down a Speaker.
None of them considered what happens now. How long before enough of the sane Rs get fed up and make a deal with the Ds to seat the most moderate R in the House? It would only take 5 Rs to break away because the Ds are willing to vote together. Do you really think there aren't five Rs fed up with the Freedom Caucus and vulnerable enough in their districts that they need to distance themselves from Gaetz and his dumpster fire?
If the result of Gaetz's hubris is a more moderate Republican Speaker willing to work across the aisle, I will be struggling for breath every time a vote happens due to unstoppable laughter.
“How long before enough of the sane Rs get fed up and make a deal with the Ds to seat the most moderate R in the House?”
That’s actually not going to happen, because there are also quite a few fringe Ds who like ongoing chaos and won’t support a moderate R even if they got to pick which one. You know, the kind of D that might pull a fire alarm or something.
What is really going to happen, IMO, is this: right now, the interim speaker is a hand-picked McCarthy man, because those are the rules. If Gang Gaetz knocks off the interim, yet another interim, also hand-picked by Team McCarthy, takes over. The cycle is never interrupted because Gang Gaetz has votes to knock off a speaker, but not even one-tenth of what it takes to elect one.
Each interim can give the Dems a continuing resolution, send our social security money to the Ukraine, hold a gala ball celebrating Mitt Romney, and publicly eat lunch with Liz Cheney.
"You know, the kind of D that might pull a fire alarm or something."
Fair point. But with a prize like a moderate Speaker in an R-controlled House, I wouldn't bet against D leadership. They have wingnuts, too, but it would be a huge embarrassment to the GOP. That would bring AOC and the lunatic fringe along.
"What is really going to happen, IMO, is this:"
You're probably right, as sad as that scenario is. The one thing that's certain is that Gang Gaetz isn't getting anything it wants. Quite the opposite.
Drmocrat pretending to be centrist supports D leadership. Shocker.
Where do you see me supporting D leadership? I don't care what party the leadership is from if they are effectively governing. The Rs are definitely not governing effectively, and haven't since George W Bush left office.
Matt Gaetz is a joke. I would laugh at anyone who acted in such a self-destructive way, but my laughter is tinged with sadness because the goal of balancing the budget has been eliminated for this budget by Gaetz's idiocy.
"McCarthy's defenders argue that he's working to reform the budget process and needs more time to see it through."
He only beats them because he loves them.
On the other hand, "if Kevin fails today, we're going to get the Schumer-McConnell special," he says, referring to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R–Ky.), who Massie believes will have the upper hand in any dealings with a leaderless House GOP caucus.
Right now the Democrats are toasting with champagne , holding up pictures of Gaetz and shouting "MVP" like a winning football team. Republicans have shot themselves in the foot (again) and they have no one to blame but themselves.
Comment makes no sense as neither Schumer nor McConnel are in the House.
Look. Massie defended voting for Mccarthy and the debt agreement in January based on the spending cuts and the extra cuts if appropriation bills didn’t pass in regular order or on time. Massie backtracking from his statements for his vote actually exposes him slightly. It shows his rationalization for the votes were wrong or he was lying.
Massie needs a better statement than calls for chaos. Mccarthy broke the agreement. Full stop.
I dont get this blind acceptance of not holding politicians to their promises.
"I dont get this blind acceptance of not holding politicians to their promises."
Thank you, Brother Jesse. Like you I agree with holding politicians accountable to their promises. Like when Trump promised to build a wall on the southern border and make Mexico pay for it. I was very disappointed when he didn't keep his promise and I refused to vote for him in 2020 for that reason.
Nice try sarc.
Trump's immigration policy was exceptionally successful.
How good it was was demonstrated by what the consequences have been since Biden dismantled it.
I do understand that he was elected specifically on the promise not to do this, and therefore Gaetz was "entitled" to collect his pound of flesh.
Whether it was actually a good idea to collect that debt right now is a different question.
What is the downside? Mccarthy passed another CR where more dems voted for it than GOP.
(Laursen-style Disclaimer: I'm a capital-L Libertarian and very much enjoy any self-destructive behavior on the part of a major party. So the following can be taken as concern trolling.)
The downside:
1. Democrats are grinning and dancing. That alone should tell you something is wrong with the plan.
2. Gaetz doesn't have the votes to elect anyone, all he can do is prevent. As long as he prevents, there will be an Interim Speaker, who was picked by McCarthy.
3. So, Team McCarthy is still in power, and not only could they do more CRs and Ukraine, they might even ramp it up out of spite.
After reading up, I guess I need to walk back #3 a little. Apparently the rules are that an interim speaker can't do squat except preside over the election of a new speaker.
But of course if the House violates its own internal rules and passes CRs anyway with an interim speaker, there's not squat anyone outside Congress could do about that, either.
The interim speaker kicked Pelosi out of her cushy office. That's something.
Did he at least put his feet up on the desk?
"That’s something."
You're applauding the interim Speaker, during an internal crisis, focusing his energy on kicking Nancy Pelosi out of her office? What the hell?
And why do I care about any of that?
They can't pass the CR until a new speaker is elected. This is a warning shot there are enough votes for any squish leaders who lie to the GOP caucus regarding deals made. This is the first time ever the GOP has held their leadership accountable.
This is the first time ever
the GOP8 out of 218 fraction of the GOP has held their leadership accountable."They can’t pass the CR until a new speaker is elected."
What are you talking about? Do you really not understand how it works? There's already an interim Speaker (a McCarthy guy, BTW) who can preside over any session. They can pass anything and everything that comes up for a vote.
"This is the first time ever the GOP has held their leadership accountable."
Exactly what have they been "held accountable" for? Making compromises in a situation where compromise it literally the only way to get something passed? That's what politics is, the art of getting some of what you want through compromise.
You aren't foolish enough to think House Rs can get everything they want, are you?
And when would be?
Somewhere between never and never, as it goes with conservatives priorities.
As an occasional Republican voter, why do I care? The party is half neocon globalists.
Is Graetz after the Manichaen vote, or planning to retire and become a Nestorian lobbyist?
Gaetz is going for the soon to be term limited Governorship of Florida - with a weak/lame duck Desantis floundering in his run for president. He needs the spotlight and his name in the news.
But revenge from McCarthy wing of the GOP may be coming...appears they may be re-vamping their ethics complaints against him for all his scandals involving underage girls, cocaine and sex trafficking. Which in FL maybe that will help him.
https://twitter.com/Liz_Wheeler/status/1709323009041760496?t=zIVTtZ7_9ePoc5kiokm5iQ&s=19
I love how all the “true conservatives” are furious that Gaetz ousted McCarthy as Speaker but we didn’t hear a word from the “true cons” when 18 House Republicans voted against an amendment that would’ve defunded drag shows & pride month at the DoD. Spare me.
https://twitter.com/BowTiedRanger/status/1709381829164138960?t=y7btngsjBpBD4lL_qPFOTQ&s=19
All the right people are upset over this
[Link]
What was McCarthy getting the GOP and their constituents out of the deal? That’s the thing I haven’t heard Massie or Huckabee or any of the others attacking Gaetz really explain. It’s just, “let’s be United in caving”. If you can sell me on the idea that we’re *losing* something by holding McCarthy to his own promises, Ok. But until then, gridlock and disruption seems as good a plan as any to me.
They accepted a government shutdown, which serves the reelection chances of neocons and consists in the Republican party.
I'm in favor of holding government officials accountable and wold like to see more leaders called out. For example McConnell and Schumer in the senate and Jeffries in the house. The list goes on and one and on as the percentage of corrupt elected officials is far more than honest elected officials.
Probably because when people are honest, like Cheney, Amash, McCain, and Romney, they get exiled by their party.
If this means that DC is going to wind up like Sodom and Gamorrah, and all the bureaucrats are going to be turned into pillars of salt, I'm game.
OMFG
https://mynews13.com/fl/orlando/news/2023/10/04/troy-nehls-trump-speaker-of-house-nomination
The GOP clown car just keeps on letting the clowns out.
Google paid $95 a hour on the internet..my close relative has been without labor for nine months and the earlier month her compensation check was $51005 by working at home for 10 hours a day….. Everybody must try this job now by just use this:-
http://Www.Smartwork1.com