The Trial Begins: DOJ Sues Google Over Search Engine Dominance
Plus: FDA approves new COVID-19 vaccine, Elizabeth Warren goes after Elon Musk, and more...

Google's trial begins today. The Department of Justice has sued the tech giant for cornering more than 90 percent of the search engine market. The government argues that this dominance reflects anticompetitive practices, while Google counters that its search engine is simply a preferred service.
"It's the government's first major monopoly case to make it to trial in decades and the first in the age of the modern internet," notes NPR. "The Justice Department's case hinges on claims that Google illegally orchestrated its business dealings, so that it's the first search engine people see when they turn on their phones and web browsers. The government says Google's goal was to stomp out competition."
The DOJ is beginning its antitrust trial against $GOOGL and it's being billed as the biggest antitrust case in 20 years. @EamonJavers has the details: pic.twitter.com/fn03V9OHlP
— Squawk Box (@SquawkCNBC) September 12, 2023
At issue are the deals in place between Google and cell phone manufacturers like Apple, Samsung, and Verizon. Google pays billions of dollars to these companies to ensure that its search engine is the default on their phones. The federal government claims these arrangements are illegal and unfair to smaller search engines, like DuckDuckGo.
Google has countered that its search engine is more popular by far—in fact, if it was not the default search engine on most cell phones, there is little doubt that the overwhelming majority of customers would choose it anyway. As The Wall Street Journal points out, Windows computers do not come preloaded with Google, but most users swiftly download Google anyway.
The suit was first brought by the Trump administration. Former Attorney General William Barr said the lawsuit "strikes at the heart of Google's grip over the internet for millions of American consumers, advertisers, small businesses and entrepreneurs beholden to an unlawful monopolist."
There is little doubt that Google commands a significant market share and that its deals with cell phone manufacturers come at the expense of rival search engines. But the relevant question is whether this hurts consumers. For most people, Google is the entrance point to the internet. If they wanted a different way to search, there are plenty available. DOJ's suit implicitly argues that the federal government knows us better than we know ourselves—even though our revealed preferences suggest that we like Google perfectly fine.
Foes of government overreach should be rooting for another big loss. The Google trial is set to last for three months. Judge Amit P. Mehta, an Obama appointee, will decide the case.
FREE MINDS
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) wants the government to investigate Elon Musk following news that he prevented Ukraine from accessing Starlink when the country tried to attack a Russian warship. According to Bloomberg:
"The Congress needs to investigate what's happened here and whether we have adequate tools to make sure foreign policy is conducted by the government and not by one billionaire," the Massachusetts Democrat said Monday at the Capitol.
Musk, the chief executive officer of SpaceX, is expected to be among the technology industry chiefs to attend a closed-door summit with senators at the Capitol on Wednesday.
Warren, a member of the Armed Services Committee, said she also wants the Defense Department to look into its contractual relationship with the company.
Perhaps Warren could investigate why Congress has outsourced its war-making powers to the executive branch. Technically, it's Warren and her colleagues who are supposed to be responsible for such foreign policy decisions.
FREE MARKETS
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved an updated coronavirus vaccine, which is designed to counter the XBB.1.5 strain of omicron. That strain is no longer dominant, though the FDA believes the new vaccine will still offer significant cross-protection. "Like earlier versions, they're expected to be most protective against COVID-19's worst consequences rather than mild infection," reports the Associated Press.
That admission, however, is a good reminder that many of the vaccine mandates were premised on the idea vaccination would significantly reduce the spread of COVID-19 by preventing transmission to other people. People were encouraged—and in many cases, forced—to get vaccinated, not just for their own sakes, but also in the service of public health.
The federal government should continue to rapidly approve new COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics so that anyone who wants them is free to take them. But it must never again go down the dark path of denying this choice to millions of Americans.
QUICK HITS
- The Biden administration has reached a prisoner exchange deal with Iran.
- Will student loan repayments resume as part of the debt ceiling deal?
- Devastating earthquakes in Morocco have killed more than 2,800 people.
- North Korean President Kim Jong Un is meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That’s what you get for being successful.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
It should be little surprise that The Donald's regime brought the suit against Google. Trump wants to be another progressive Republican in the Teddy Roosevelt mold, so "trust busting" is an important policy area that demonstrates commitment to the hoi polloi.
Fortunately for libertarians, progressive Republican class warfare is nothing like progressive Democrat class warfare. Democrats are all Marxist, while Republicans are justy nobly looking out for the Little Guy.
Quit sockpuppeting Shrike.
I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h… Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link…
Try it, you won’t regret it!….. http://bigmoney8.store
Individuals can be smart, people are generally stupid.
Look how people have adopted google, can’t do without it now, knowing that search engines are paid and manipulated to yield the results of those who pay and coerce.
In a few years AI will be marketed to make all your decisions for you, all paid and coerced, critical thinking discouraged. After all WHO KNOWS BETTER THAN AI?
We’re going to need to prevent the plan to control our past, present and future. Criminalize lying.
Search engines could easily have the criteria of nearest location, and closest match in addition to most popular. But they don’t, do they?
This here individual fulfills his "Individual Good" by just using DuckDuckGo. And it searches as close and accurate as the criteria I enter into the search field and the settings I select on the top bar above the results.
And you know what? I didn't need to be an Aryan Pure Superman or have a Gauleiter or Übersturmführer telling me what is truth or a lie to figure it all out.
Past, Present, and future? I've got the middle one on lock, the last one looking brighter, and all because I learn the lessons of the first one.
And what I learn from the past is that it would all be bright if someone early on had just said:
Fuck Off, Nazi!
The Jewish religion which has defined that group of people for thousands of years is based on lying. They also claim ownership of Freemasonry, the global secret satanic lying pyramid scheme.
The holiest Jewish prayer on the holiest Jewish day yom kippur is the Kol Nidre. It is clearly a plan to lie to other people. Stupid Jews claim that it’s about lying to god because they can’t comprehend that omnipresent beings can’t be lied to.
This is the Kol Nidre text
“All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas [curses]which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect: they shall not bind us nor have any power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligations; nor the oaths be oaths.”
Fuck off Kol Nidre boy.
Well, somebody just fell off the right-hand edge of the world.
Can you understand what you read boy?
I don't think he ever was in the world in the first place.
🙂
😉
You still haven't addressed DuckDuckGo and how it contradicts what you said about Google.
And you know who founded (((DuckDuckGo?))). (((Gabriel Weinberg!)))
DuckDuckGo--Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DuckDuckGo
DuckDuckGo Fuck Off, Nazi!
You certainly haven’t demonstrated that it contradicts what I said. It doesn’t fuckwit.
A couple of lying wastes of skin.
Unicorn Abattoir 1 day ago
I also fully refute his interpretation of the Kol Nidre every year, but he keeps coming back.
TheReEncogitationer 18 hours ago
I did too independently, so the confirmation bias is strong with Herr Misek.
Rob Misek 17 hours ago
Prove it fuckwitS
I’m not holding my breath. Hahaha
https://reason.com/2023/08/10/can-we-trust-a-i-to-tell-the-truth/?comments=true#comments
Their search engine has been so curated at this point it is often useless.
And by curated, you mean left-establishment propaganda, right?
Correct.
But even searching for local events or local products is tedious at this point.
The way to defeat Google is not Anti-Trust, however. That is just how Google will lock in its marketshare.
Google separated into Alphabet years ago. They have known for years this is coming, and Their Guys are the ones suing them.
On almost anything political it is trash.
After a Tim Pool episode I decided to look up Brianna Wu to double-check my memory of her involvement in gamergate. The results were strongly whitewashed. Also interestingly, results for her don't mention anything about being trans but a search for John Walker Flynt brings up results for her that don't include the searched name.
Yeah, people love Google so much there's no need to make them affirmatively choose it right? Foolish, foolish Google. Paying billions of dollars to cell phone companies for something that people would chose to do anyway? Has anyone told Google that they're making such a terrible, multi-billion dollar mistake?
Good points! Do NOT feed ammo to your enemies! However, this is NO excuse for Government Almighty to appoint shitself ass "Enemy of Google". Bullshit grand-standing, it is!
So if Google STOPS feeding the Big Bucks to cell phone companies, will THAT satisfy blood-thirsty, punitive Government Almighty? I bet not!
Have you ever had the experience of trying to help your mom configure settings on her computer over the phone.
I think that's why Google is willing to pay to be the default search engine. The users may want Google but still not have the savvy to know how to make that happen.
Just because you are a bad teacher doesn’t mean everyone is.
So your mom doesn't have a printer, a network connection, or e-mail?
Well, my mom is no longer with us.
And maybe your mom is tech savvy, but it's a pretty common experience to have elderly family members who are clueless about computers.
Cite?
I tell ya, it's a real comforting thought that the Administration presuming to dictate search engine policies is the Administration of King Jitterbug, ruling from his Hoveround throne, calling for Hunter's crack pipe, calling for his bowl of Jello Pudding, and calling for his Fiddler Squad Four.
🙂
😉
What an asshole.
I despise Idaho Bob, but when I heard about his father dying I expressed my condolences to him, and would never joke about his father's death.
Oh, well, took you off mute for a day, thought we might be having actual conversations, and then you go back to being a fucking asshole.
No one cares who you mute.
The Reason Mute Club is like a bunch of 6th grade girls. Even they lose track of who is in or out each day.
I never doubted the passing of your poor mother, I was wondering about your other assertion.
Elon single-handedly prevents escalation of war, Pocahontas is upset.
+++
Yeah, I do not understand how Starlink has any obligations to Ukraine's war effort. I could see if Elon hindered a US maneuver, but this is bullshit.
Their ToS literally says it can't be used for military purposes.
Yep, that's something the fork-tongued neocons don't want to even consider. Their only concern is whether Musk is using his private assets to bolster their personal crusade, irrespective of whether doing so would be a violation of the company's own policies.
Like leftists and welfare programs, they are very generous with other people's property.
For some good in-depth FACTS about this, see...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/07/28/business/starlink.html Elon Musk, Starlink, and Ukraine, long article good stuff, plus nice animations of Starlink orbits…
USA fed-gov finally got off of its ASS and PAYS Starlink (instead of Starlink donating freebies to Ukraine) for supporting Ukraine. He who pays the piper, calls the tunes. Problem solved!
Shorter sqrlsy:
Voluntary actions bad. Government coercion good.
I don’t call him a fascist for nothing.
Government coerces us all to pay taxes... When ya gonna fix THAT? Good luck to YOU!
(Ukraine falling under the claws of the greedy Russian Bear is NOT in our national interests! There IS such a thing as a national interest, until such a thing as "war" exists no more! When are ya gonna fix THAT for us, too?)
What is our compelling interest in Ukraine that you would send your son over there to die for?
I'm not arguing for that. Baltic states, Poland, etc., are scared shitless that if Russia isn't stopped now, they'll go after Eastern Europe next, to re-assemble the Russian Empire. The fear is well grounded. And we have NATO obligations to defend. For 3-ish percent of our (often aged) military supplies (and military budget), the Ukrainians are doing the fighting and dying for us! Bleed the Russian beast via proxy; it's a bargain! They've lost 1/2 of their tanks in this stupid war already. Biden has kept "the USA boys out of the war", and that is wise.
I don't support "nation building" wars in shithole nations either! If the natives won't defend their own freedoms, we can't do it for them. Ukraine can and will, and they deserve our help, even if only in our own long-term interests.
You want to send other peoples kids to die.
"Biden has kept “the USA boys out of the war”, and that is wise."
Does that mean anything to you?
Ukrainians are sending themselves to fight, and for good reasons, as I have detailed! Do YOU like being invaded by a bossy, despotic, glory-and-empire-seeking egomaniac's armies? I am NOT sending them! Do you expect me to go over there and STOP them (the Ukrainians) from defending themselves?
You want other peoples to be slaves to whomever wants to be their violent slave-masters!
Voluntary actions bad. Government coercion good.
When a shit-muncher raises his head from his fecal feast to bleat "Bake the poopcake!"
The poopycake is the OTHER major ingredient inside the skull of Red-Rocks-for-Brains!
Looks like Shitsy's feeling even more incontinent these days.
In Soviet Ukraine, US Senate Impeaches Elon Musk!
So is Jake Tapper, lol:
https://twitter.com/RealScottRitter/status/1701294401320874005
That can't be real. Correct, sure. Hilarious, yes.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-AARP.)
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-ERP)
…. though the FDA believes the new vaccine will still offer significant cross-protection.
Science is now a belief system.
The FDA is out of control. Most countries have stopped recommending the boosters for anyone who isn't old and sick. And specifically recommend against for younger people. Yet in the US they are still trying to push it for fucking babies. Based on zero clinical evidence. EUA needs to end. There is no emergency.
How can you say that? Trump and his supporters are still not in prison, and we could actually have an orange president again!
Did testing go from 8 rats to 0 rats?
PETA approves.
How can you take dry tasteless bread seriously?
It’s as flavorful as what you put on it and pita chips come in many flavors commercially and even custom ones through home air-frying.
Oh, and Pita the bread is collectively more intelligent than PETA the organization of terrorist lunatics.
Don’t let Pooh get your head stuck in The Hunny Tree.
🙂
😉
I would be ok with it - if the jabbers could keep thier belief system to themselves - instead of using the money and violence of the state to proselytize thier religion to the masses.
Science has always been a belief system. When done right, it's supposed to be an evidence-based belief system rather than a faith-based belief system, but it's still about believing things to be true or not.
Holy crap. A new low.
How so? What about making a response of substance?
How in the world is science not a system that advises people what to believe and not believe? That’s it’s very purpose.
If you had meant, "Science is now a faith system" why did you write, "Science is now a belief system."
That's not what "belief system" usually means. A belief system is a set of beliefs about how things are. Science is a method to assess hypotheses about how things are. Yes, people do believe things about the world based on the outputs of science. But science isn't a system of beliefs but a way of examining beliefs.
How in the world is science not a system that advises people what to believe and not believe? That’s it’s very purpose.
Science is not that.
“A new low”
Laursen: “How so?”
Mike acknowledging that he has in fact, sunk much lower than this.
Jesus, that's the stupidest description of science I have every heard. But maybe you mean The Science!
"When done right, it’s supposed to be an evidence-based belief system rather than a faith-based belief system"
Fairly certain that science, itself, is still like that. Unfortunately, we now also have SCIENCE!™, which is entirely faith based.
Don't disagree. There is a tremendous amount of junk science.
big difference between science and blind faith is that science rarely speaks in absolutes, and it is willing to change when presented with new evidence.
when a scientist says they believe a certain outcome will happen, they mean the available evidence suggests that is what will happen. the only blind faith is from those who refuse to believe that probability, no matter what.
Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt. - Richard P. Feynman
But what about official government Science?
Culture of deception, control, and profit.
This is big and will fly under a lot of people’s news radar:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/lithium-deposit-found-us-may-be-among-worlds-largest-study-finds
“A deposit of lithium recently discovered along the Nevada-Oregon border may be among the world’s largest, having potentially huge implications for the transition to electric vehicles.”
Regulations will no doubt hinder progress in mining it.
You are probably right.
One would think folks in government would recognize that they need this lithium is they are going to push electric vehicles and pursue a foreign policy of not being dependent on other countries. Perhaps some of the profits finding their way into politicians’ hands will speed things up a bit.
https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/biden-administration-blocks-minnesotas-twin-metals-mine/
Nice “Government” dig when it is largely one party.
Are you capable of blaming democrats in isolation?
What makes you think this regime doesn’t want us dependent on foreign countries?
What part of “globalists” don’t you understand?
Environmental policies seem to be completely disconnected from considering the means of how to accomplish them. It is just pandering to the emotional impulses of this and that interest groups which often have contradictory goals. This results in irrational overall policy.
Q - How long before the left starts to protest lithium mining?
A - As soon as it happens in the US.
A – As soon as it happens in the US.
What, you expect them to allow that shit here? That's what third world shitholes are for.
But if all the brown people move to NYC, who will do the work?
Seems to me most of the horde is young men, so the kids can still do it.
Kids belong in cages, not mines.
at night. mines during daytime.
Day/night does not matter underground.
Kids belong in cages, not mines.
Spoken like a true libertarian. *tips top hat, polishes monocle*
Lol.
There is currently one lithium mine in the US, in Clayton County, Nevada. There was a protest against the mine, but it was from a local Indian tribe, not from leftists.
[Disclaimer: Not defending the left, just introducing some facts.]
Oh, wait. There is a lithium mine starting up in Nevada (a third location separate from Clayton Valley and separate from the one in Oregon) where a local conservation group opposed the mine becuase it would affect an engandered snail:
https://www.rgj.com/story/news/2021/01/28/clean-energy-battle-ongoing-between-conservationists-producers-nv/4269663001/
And, if you read the article, the Sierra Club waffled about their position on the project, not taking a strong stance.
Did the protesters arrive in EV's?
It's in the middle of nowehere in Nevada. That means they looked like Walter Brennan and John Huston and showed up to protest on their mules.
You literally just defended the left.
His disclaimers are doing A LOT of work lately.
Just amazing to see the dishonest construction out in the open.
Since when did the left not stand with natives with respect to environmental concerns on native land?
Perhaps the left isn't really concerned with native land, and more concerned with their own agenda.
Too many sacred cows will need to be slaughtered:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12504841/Worlds-largest-lithium-deposit-McDermitt-Caldera-US.html
Because voodoo and magical monsters are Science!
That's something which has to be taken into account, though--people underestimate just how thoroughly animist most Native American religious beliefs are, even if a lot of it these days is just a pose similar to Christmas Christians or Passover Jews. And these people have a lot more political sway in the current mainstream than they did 50 years ago.
Now personally, I'd rather leave the shit alone just because I don't want to support this dumb "green" cult with the country's national resources, when we already have plenty of extractive activities going on that provide us what we need.
People also do not know or ignore how incredibly sexist and racist most tribal belief systems are.
As long as they were not invented or practiced by white people it is ok.
I don't think 1A discriminates between "acceptable" and "unacceptable" religious beliefs.
Islam honor killings? Human sacrafice? Taking hallucinogenic drugs to take a mystic quest? Slavery? Jihad?
Pretty sure all these things are banned.
There is indeed an unresolved tension between 1A and some religious practices but commonly those tensions arise wrt potential illegal conduct. A claim on land or of a violation of belief is a different matter.
The text of 1A is utterly unambiguous, though - "Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the free exercise [of religion]" - so any textualist reading requires that the acts you mention cannot be prohibited, though no court will go along with that, of course. According to the Constitution, Congress has as much authority to prohibit human sacrifice for religious purposes as it has to prohibit "assault rifles". But no-one except possibly Thugees would agree.
I once sent in my $1 to get a certificate saying I am an ordained minister of the Universal Life Church.
I got a pamphlet explaining that (a) I now had several famous fellow ministers, including The Beatles; (b) theoretically, I could set up a tax-free church as long as I could recruit a board of directors consisting of a chair, treasurer, and secretary. (No, I didn’t try it.)
As of the 9th and 10th Amendments, all exercise of religion has to be compatible with the equally-held and previously existing Individual Rights of others. Rights exist according to The Laws of Identity and Non-Contradiction and there is no such thing as a “right” to violate the rights of others, “sincerely held religious belief” or not.
Precise and concise.
As of the 9th and 10th Amendments, all exercise of religion has to be compatible with the equally-held and previously existing Individual Rights of others.
When there's a conflict between an enumerated and an unenumerated right, the former will take precedence.
Further, that the Constitution lists rights is no less support for my position that they're convenient fictions. Writing down a fictional idea doesn't make it real. You can't argue that because the Constitution exists as a real thing, the rights it refers to are likewise real. (Cf. the Bible.)
Rights exist according to The Laws of Identity and Non-Contradiction
Objectivist clap-trap. (FWIW I have encountered Objectivists who have used the Law of Identity to "disprove" quantum mechanics.)
.
“Every Land is Sacred” - sung to the tune of Every Sperm is Sacred from Meaning of Life
There are two levels of sacred land.
Level 1: it's too sacred to ever develop.
Level 2: sufficient respect for the sacredness can be achieved by building a community center up front and then donating 10% of the net profits each year to maintain the center and its programs.
I thought it was casino or no casino.
If they don’t want people mining on the land, they should buy the land.
Or refuse to sell it if they already own it.
Unless the government uses eminent domain to force them to sell. That would be bad.
Cite it flying under anyone's radar?
With Joe's history if killing mining contracts it largely doesn't matter at the moment.
Either Biden bans extraction to save sacred Native Americans or he hands it over to the Chinese.
Also at the link
https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/man-forced-ditch-115k-ford-ev-truck-family-road-trip-chicago-biggest-scam-modern-times
Sucker.
The Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (WH) has disputed Bala's account, saying the charge "was prohibited because of a 'Vehicle Protocol Error," suggesting the problem was with the vehicle, not with the charger.
LOL. I have yet to find a gas station that won't let me dump gasoline into a completely unvalidated plastic jug. Unvalidated to the point that when memes about dispensing gas into zip-loc bags go around, experts and officials issue "Don't do that." warnings. As embodied, it is a fundamentally and inherently less free energy/transportation system.
“As embodied, it is a fundamentally and inherently less free energy/transportation system.”
Feature, not bug.
"Flame On!"--mad.casual impersonating The Human Torch.
Why is the 'roundup' never headlined as such?
Do you know how expensive headlines are?
More likely that "roundup" is now on some trigger word list.
See the WSJ today for an article on young people afraid of "feedback".
More likely that “roundup” is now on some trigger word list.
Yeah, the EU found that it's associated with one of the most common forms of cancer with the most known causes that's also one of the most survivable cancers on the planet.
Don't want Reason's premier "Breaking News" series getting confused with late night ambulance-chaser ads.
"...See the WSJ today for an article on young people afraid of “feedback”."
OFFS!
Couldn't find the Joe Dirt clip where they let it play out that his mics don't like no feedback.
"Roundup" sounds all cowboy-ey, so there is that.
🙂
😉
Trademark infringement. Toxic product too similar to the weed killer.
My fucking county has banned the use of it on lawns. My geriatric hippie neighbors cheered.
https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/lawns/law/allowed-pesticides.html
Never mind.
It’s a cash grab. Google is has money, and the government wants some.
I dunno. That would make sense for a private lawsuit, but the Federal government has virtually endless money. I think it might be more about showing Google who's the boss.
Never mind
The government never tries to take money from people.
— Mike Liarson
"" but the Federal government has virtually endless money.""
Really? Then why tax us?
The article says it started under the Trump administration. Most likely it would be too toxic to just dump it outright after Google helped get Biden elected by helping suppress the laptop story, so instead they will piddle around and make a big show of 'holding Google accountable' and in the end Google will settle for a healthy payout to Administration-approved 'non-profits'.
Perhaps Warren could investigate why Congress has outsourced its war-making powers to the executive branch.
But how will she raise money for campaigns doing that? No better to attack a boogie man billionaire.
Yup, old Indian trick.
The 1% Indians are the worst.
Featherhead vs dothead in this case.
That one requires no investigation. The chief executive is currently a Democrat. Warren would be in high dudgeon about executive power if the President was a Republican.
"The suit was first brought by the Trump administration."
PUNISH Google for being successful! It USED to be that "Team R" was pro-business and pro-property rights! NOW "Team R" is for "whatever gets us more POWER!!!" (Be sure to make the RIGHT donations!)
The thing that amazes me the most is when this living cartoon calls other people tribalist.
The thing that amazes me the most is when Marxist Mammary-Misek-Farter-Fuhrer doesn't refute a damned thing that I write, and just calls me names, instead! I think that the willfully self-seeking and greedy-selfish-brained photosynthetic plants have TAKEN OVER HER SO-CALLED "BRAIN"!
"Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) wants the government to investigate Elon Musk following news that he prevented Ukraine from accessing Starlink when the country tried to attack a Russian warship."
The same sort of thing came from Romney. They're not even making it a secret anymore that they're using the Ukraine as a proxy to wage war on Russia.
Fucking vultures.
When did the US congress get jurisdiction in Ukraine?
When they bought them?
^This
It's the Biden-Fauci legacy.
The good news is America is winning the war on Russia. The bad news is, the Communists aren't loosing.
Nobody suspected that the third world war would be Russia against the USSA.
These assholes are in a real bind because Musk's Falcon rockets are putting a lot of US defense satellites into space and NASA is effectively useless now, but they're so assmad about him not using Twatter as an active information suppression tool against conservatives that they're trying to figure out a way to crowbar him out of there. That's why their mouthpieces like David Frum were saying that the US should nationalize Twitter, which would be real, actual fascism, as opposed to the boilerplate pejorative that shitlibs like to use.
"They’re not even making it a secret anymore that they’re using the Ukraine as a proxy to wage war on Russia."
Yes, this! WHY did we goad "the Ukraine" into attacking Russia, and invading Russian territory, trying to take it over?!?!? WHY, Santa, WHY!?!??! Maybe "the Canada" can EXPLAIN it all to us all?
"...The suit was first brought by the Trump administration. Former Attorney General William Barr..."
Guy needs to be tared and feathered; one of Trump's mistakes.
The doj entered in "does Google need to be broken up"
Hit I feel lucky and the link was to alphabets corporate sight talking about how evil they are
Twitter appears to throttle New York Times
"Since late July, engagement on X posts linking to the New York Times has dropped dramatically. The drop in shares and other engagement on tweets with Times links is abrupt, and is not reflected in links to similar news organizations including CNN, the Washington Post, and the BBC, according to NewsWhip’s data on 300,000 influential users of X....
a broad shift in platforms over the last five years... toward a splintering in which Facebook has largely gotten out of the news business, Twitter has shifted increasingly toward becoming a conservative media company, and Google and Apple are the remaining the platform giants interested in distributing other outlets’ news."
Twitter has stopped censoring conservative speech. If you think it now looks like "a conservative media company," perhaps you're observing how important censorship has been to the dominance of progressive speech in social media.
Don't worry when ENB is back from burning man nyt will get a bunch of references on reason
Twitter has shifted increasingly toward becoming a conservative media company
Lol, what? Not doing the government's bidding wrt censoring wrongthink = "becoming a conservative media company?"
And they think they are being retrained and objective. What they really want to do is call Elon "Hitler" and X the digital equivalent of Nazi death camps.
Yes, leftists are no longer hiding their love of censorship.
The hard core left never hid that. The genteel left used to talk about free speech but now can't abide disagreement from the masses.
weird, when Twitter stops mandating govt propaganda, the largest govt propaganda outlet hardest hit
couldn't have foreseen
YouTube had to bias their algorithms to get the major media companies to get hits.
X, as a private company can do what it likes. But that doesn't make people who approve of this - assuming the report is true - any less hypocritical when they'd previously complained that Twitter was censoring right-wing sources.
The wild speculation (lol report) isn't true, it would have been clear if you read that pile. Making it harder for Media Matter bot farms to ride the platform isn't censorship in any form, and that's where a good amount of NYT linking came from.
When asked if congress had war making powers Lizzy Warren's only responce was
How
I dont know why she just doesn't fly over to Ukraine and teach them how to use smoke signals.
She's got her war paint on.
Of course Google has operated illegally. This is patently obvious, since everybody knows that Netscape is a far superior search engine..... /sarc (obviously)
Google does operate illegally, they literally admitted to altering the search algorithm to go against conservatives.
Fires people based on politics.
"demonitizes" you tubers while still collecting money from their content
PrIvAtE cOmPaNy!
Ohhh yeah they also give information and censor things at the request of the feds, no warrenty needed.
OH and there's the whole origin that they were and are a cia operation
Fires people based on politics.
And honors contract violations.
James Damore provided an internal memo that was solicited from him internally. Someone, in violation of their employment agreement and, in turn, in violation of Google's agreement with Damore, disclosed that information to the press. Damore got fired. Whomever, actually violated their employment agreement and actually, knowingly embarrassed/impugned Google disappeared into the "...and nothing else happened."
Jeeves crying in the corner.
"Why doesn't anyone ask me anything anymore?!" *sobs* - Jeeves
Joined by Alta Vista...
I just discovered that Lycos is still going.
Netscape should never be forgiven for unleashing JavaScript on the world.
Missives from the libertarian half of Reason.
Second Amendment Roundup: "He's at It Again!"
Merrick Garland proposes ever-more intrusive ATF regulations.
Massive noncompliance is the answer.
Yep. Seems to be working in NM.
Oh, this reminds me!
For all the people wanting more "religion in the public square," be careful what you wish for, or you'll be awash in people like Ed Gaskin, who made what has to be the Goddamn stupidest argument for gun control:
God, Guns, Mass Shootings, and Evangelicals
by Ed Gaskin
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/god-guns-mass-shootings-and-evangelicals/
Folks, sacrificing your first-born, or any other ordinal number, of child or children, whether Male, Female, or Trans, has never been a requirement of any aspect of keeping and bearing arms!
No law has ever required human sacrifice as a prerequisite for manufacture, purchase, or ownership of arms!
No arms dealer has ever required human sacrifice as payment in the purchase of arms!
And no book such as Elliot Eigginton's Foxfire 5 has ever had a recipe that requires human sacrifice in the manufacture of muzzleloaders, saltpeter, gunpowder, guncotton, or cordite!
Manufacture, purchase, and ownership of arms does not require human sacrifice, but crimes and tyranny committed with arms do require human sacrifice!
Yet this Ed Gaskin basically blood libels 119 million U.S. Citizens for keeping and bearing arms for sport, hunting, and self-defense, all for the acts of criminals and tyrants!
There is a legal term for people who engage in this kind of moral blurring of the lines and do not know right from wrong.
Prima facie, ipso facto, a priori, he speaks for himself, no further study required, Ed Haskin is insane. And a dummy.
Sanford Dummy Reel
https://youtu.be/moYdbNXBwvk
Correction: Elliot Wigginton.
Unsubscribe From Everything
You may think you’re not worth spying on. But to our government, we’re all terrorists now.
You breath out CO2, don't you?
Hey, if you're not doing anything wrong you got nothing to worry about.
MSNBC cones right out propping up election interference. 600 years for being critical of elections if you're republican. Applauded if you're a Democrat and advocate barring the opposition from being on a ballot.
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/colorado-voters-want-ban-trump-2024-lawsuit-rcna104176
The party of democracy defending elections so long as you can only vote for the people they have approved
They admire democracy when properly managed, like in North Korea.
Don't they have 100% turnout in North Korea? You can't beat that!
From the article: The fact that the lawsuit is being brought in Colorado is not an accident.
No shit. The reason is because the shitlibs in the Colorado DA's office will push it through, just like the assholes who forced the Green party off several state ballots in 2020. And of course this is being pushed by a bunch of Stockholm Syndrome ex-Republican "independents" as the front group.
Apparently having a slam-dunk electoral win in 2024 isn't enough, they're actively telling the Colorado GOP who they can and can't nominate.
Reason only cares about 3rd parties if it can hurt the GOP. See them propping up the leftist media darling Lib candidate in Ga and Florida. Reason will almost never talk about 3rd party candidates kicked off that would hurt the dems.
first, let me say that the attempts to keep trump off the ballot are absolutely insane. it requires far too much conjecture and too little proof.
that said.... this is from the article:
"The suit, filed on Sept. 6 in Colorado District Court by Republican and unaffiliated voters......."
the people trying this stunt are republicans who don't think Trump can win in the general election. it might give dems a great big rubbery one, but it isn't them doing it.
The "Republicans" are almost all NeverTrumper ex-GOP members (Krista Kafer is probably the one exception) who started calling themselves "independents" and mostly caucus with Democrats these days. One of the attorneys representing the group, Martha Tierney, is basically on retainer for the Colorado Democrats, while another, Mario Nicolais, is an ex-GOP member who simps for Democrat causes in his Colorado Sun articles, and worked for Democrat race-baiter Leslie Herod in her Denver mayoral campaign. The suit itself was filed via Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, which is a Democrat-aligned front group.
And what's going to happen, because like a lot of Coloradans, these people are so drug-addled that they've lost all future-time orientation, is that GOP activists are likely going to do the same thing in response to any Democrat politicians who encouraged the Floyd rioters, using the same specious logic.
"NeverTrumper ex-GOP members"
so..... republicans who don't like trump.... not democrats....
Useful pawns for the left.
Republicans who desperately want the right kind of people to like them.
Ex-Republicans, and in the attorneys' case, outright Democrats.
"NeverTrumper ex-GOP members (Krista Kafer is probably the one exception) who started calling themselves “independents” and mostly caucus with Democrats these days."
So, not Republicans.
Translation, we have no data but approved it anyway. *individual results may vary*
"most protective against COVID-19’s worst consequences rather than mild infection"
Spoiler alert: mild infection is the worst consequence for the vast majority
Spoiler alert: Death is the worst consequence for many.
It is always an unforeseen consequence when octogenarians get sick and die.
Not many at all.
...lmao, you learned NOTHING from the last 3 years.
Jesus gaslighting really does work on the weak minded
I personally know people who died of COVID-19. One personal friend died of it. One personal friend was hospitalized for it. It's not a myth. It's you who are gaslighting by telling people it doesn't happen. Fuck off.
You had a friend?
Gonna need a citation for that.
Sorry, your "I KNEW SOMEONE WHO DIED" histrionics fall flat here.
If they died of COVID odds are they were in the risk category that would benefit from a vaccine...the old, sick, and fat. Sorry bro, thats just how it is.
If they weren't in that category (the majority of the country), they didn't need a vaccine forced on them. Sorry if that interferes with your "DO SOMETHING! PPL DYING!" narrative that you let the authoritarians get away with for years.
The time for emotional blackmail has passed, and unfortunately for your kind, that mass psychosis is not in fashion anymore.
What an asshole.
Death is inevitable. Side effects of experiments are the worst consequence for many.
"Side effects of experiments"
progressives refer to these as "children"
“Missed abortion opportunities “
Fauci does have a history of experimenting on children.
Yet somehow there are thousands of progressive children. It's almost like progressives are normal people with normal desires to raise families.
[Disclaimer: Not a defense of progressives specifically, but a defense of general respect and tolerance for those with opposing views.]
Cite?
This one goes back a ways:
https://america250.org/news/woodrow-wilsons-children/
Their three daughters, Margaret, Jessie, and Eleanor, each chose distinctive paths that inspired women throughout the country.
Do you really think “progressives” in Wilson’s day are the same as modern day “progressives”?
Well they were racists who loved censorship and war.
What "side effects of experiments"? Please be specific what you are complaining about.
Lol.
Mike and Brandy apparently missed all of 21-23
That was a non-answer.
You muted the hundreds of links you've been given.
I think he might be referring to the microchips. Damn, the secret it out!
That's ridiculous! They would clearly need to be nanochips to fit through the needle.
They exist
https://newatlas.com/electronics/worlds-smallest-single-chip-system-injectable/
Best to kill yourself and avoid a risky unplanned death.
Conservaturds making friends, gathering votes, and influencing people by... PEDDLING KOOL-AID AND SUICIDE!!! How's it workin' for ya, servant and serpent of the Evil One?
EvilBahnFuhrer, drinking EvilBahnFuhrer Kool-Aid in a spiraling vortex of darkness, cannot or will not see the Light… It’s a VERY sad song! Kinda like this…
He’s a real Kool-Aid Man,
Sitting in his Kool-Aid Land,
Playing with his Kool-Aid Gland,
His Hero is Jimmy Jones,
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jim-Jones
Loves death and the dying moans,
Then he likes to munch their bones!
He’s truly, completely a necrophiliac,
His brain, squirming toad-like, is REALY, really whack!
Has no thoughts that help the people,
He wants to turn them all to sheeple!
On the sheeple, his Master would feast,
Master? A disaster! Just the nastiest Beast!
Kool-Aid man, please listen,
You don’t know, what you’re missin’,
Kool-Aid man, better thoughts are at hand,
The Beast, to LEAVE, you must COMMAND!
A helpful book is to be found here: M. Scott Peck, Glimpses of the Devil
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1439167265/reasonmagazinea-20/
Hey EvilBahnFuhrer …
If EVERYONE who makes you look bad, by being smarter and better-looking than you, killed themselves, per your wishes, then there would be NO ONE left!
Who would feed you? Who’s tits would you suck at, to make a living? WHO would change your perpetually-smelly DIAPERS?!!?
You’d better come up with a better plan, Stan!
Weekend staff working on a Tuesday?
Anyway, spamflag.
Death-loving power pigs love & support death and suicide! What an UDDER surprise, Marxist Mammary-Misek-Miserable clone!
Shouldn’t that be; Spaz flag?
I'm-a-gonna fag-flag the Madly Vulgar SheMale one of these days! Quiver in your boots in FEAR, Vulgarly Mad Fake-Pussy-in-Boots!!!
Actually getting an experimental drug jammed in your arm is the worst consequence.
Did Elizabeth Warren fall for the trap of shorting Tesla stock?
Indian giver.
Another great John Harwood thread discussing the hypocrisy of the left on open borders in their desire to push all costs to red states.
https://twitter.com/Doc_0/status/1699768177192833034
Democrats are using illegal immigrants to blame for their shitty city budgets.
https://justthenews.com/government/local/chicago-house-migrants-tents-mayor-open-budget-cuts-nyc
"People were encouraged—and in many cases, forced—to get vaccinated, not just for their own sakes, but also in the service of public health."
But those pesky conservatives are the *fascists*, to be sure
There's absolutely no reason both major parties cannot be fascist at the same time. They can even be fascist about different things.
[Disclaimer: Seems like I'm just stating the very obvious, but, apparently, many commenters here believe in exclusive disjunctions that arise by magic.]
How lazy. A boaf sidez without even providing the other side.
the people who need to be told they are doing the same shit already know the way the other tribe does it.
Google shouldn't be hit on monopoly charges, but on their history of buy and kills and stealing services from inventors trying to sell products to them.
If the Google installed junta is looking at this then it's something Google wants. The company is the party and the party is the company.
Yeah. Won't be surprised if the settlement agreement includes new regulations through the back door of courts to harm their competitors.
I think that's SOP for every large tech company.
And is a literal example of anti trust actions for other industry. The protection for tech firms needs to be ended.
The problem is the nature of the consumer and the product. For example, if somehow CBS started producing amazing TV shows and so their viewership soared and they got 90% of broadcast viewers - could NBC and ABC sue on anti-trust grounds? Nope.
And I wonder whether your opposition to Google and some other tech firms was based on their (claimed) political bias, rather than any market-dominance argument.
It's only insurrection when you do it.
Progressive Activists Storm and Take Over Kevin McCarthy's Office
But did they have a fire exhinguisher? Bear spray maybe? Flex cuffs? They can't possibly overthrow the governmnet without a hat adorned with plastic horns.
Any boots on desks?
No fences were harmed in the storming of this office. So no multi decade sentences needed.
At least they were smart enough to not glue themselves to something like the environmental activists.
It wasn't a Holy Day.
Even you don't seriously believe that this is comparable to Jan 6 (nor do you believe the argument you're attempting to formulate that it is worse)
I hope this time we're making the trade for a good shooter/ point guard...
Nope iran gets their top 3 terrorists back, and Biden gets a Sammy Sosa base ball card, and the gum that came with the pack
and the gum that came with the pack
30+ year old gum? How's he gonna chew it with his dentures?
30 year old gum? You clearly never collected baseball cards. The gum in a new pack is at least 30 years old, the gum now probably predates biden
I didn't think anything predated Biden.
Yeah, but don't be surprised if you see the gum hanging on the wall and Biden asking why everything tastes like cardboard.
Google may have dominance in the search "market", but meanwhile removing Bing use from the default search engine for Windows is a major pain in the butt.
Also, every damned browser has a feature to easily select which search engine to use by default. Use of Google is entirely and 100% voluntary in every sense of the word.
Biden Administration and Democrats in general, just don't like successful businesses. Plenty of stuff I don't like about Google, but their search engine is not one of them.
p.s. I wonder if the Team Red will get behind Biden on this. They hate Google after all. Because of algorithm or whatever.
Google actively supports harassment of non progressive employees
Well not quite voluntary.
https://in.mashable.com/tech/26488/google-illegally-tracks-users-internet-usage-sundar-pichai-may-be-questioned
It's a 153 page complaint filed by DOJ joined by 8 States and it's not about and has absolutely NOTHING to do with users voluntarily choosing which search engine to use. '... but most users swiftly download Google anyway....' - you don't download google; this simply demonstrates the author is clueless what is being alleged -
you don’t download google; this simply demonstrates the author is clueless what is being alleged
Everyone knows it comes on floppy disks in the mail.
you don’t download google; this simply demonstrates the author is clueless what is being alleged
"What is internet?" - Robby Suave, 2023
Can you be a monopoly when you provide a service for free? Nobody pays to use a search engine. Advertisers/businesses have no leg to stand on or they could sue the government for having a monopoly on roads and highways.
"For most people, Google is the entrance point to the internet. If they wanted a different way to search, there are plenty available."
You expect the laziest, wokest, sciency-est, most coddled but still most stressed generation to (1) have ANY knowledge about how to operate the digital crack supplier their very self-identity depends on, and (2) to make some effort to make a decision and take some action beyond turning the damned thing on? You fascist!
"(1) have ANY knowledge about how to operate the digital crack supplier their very self-identity depends on"
And importantly, all of their favorite flavor of digital crack, the one that confirms all of their biases and tells them that the other side is icky mean heads, already is readily supplied by the current overlords.
"Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) wants the government to investigate Elon Musk following news that he prevented Ukraine from accessing Starlink when the country tried to attack a Russian warship."
Now, what's that called when a totalitarian government directs private business, especially in conducting war?
"Sorry sir, we are actually all out of *fascism* today, we used it up on literally every mundane cause in which someone didn't follow progressive church orthodoxy"
I don't know, I'm drawing a blank. I think it starts with an "f" and the Germans were really into it at one time. Maybe it's Farfegnuggen? No, that's not it. I was thinking maybe fascism, but that can't be it because that's what Fauxcahontas and her ilk accuse their opposition of being. Damn, it'll come to me eventually.
Italy, General; don't forget Italy.
They did it well.
Oh yeah, right. That one guy was really popular with American Progressives like FDR until he suddenly wasn't. What was his name? Bennitoe Mooselicky? Something like that.
America?
"The federal government should continue to rapidly approve new COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics so that anyone who wants them is free to take them. But it must never again go down the dark path of denying this choice to millions of Americans."
How dare you sully the word "choice" in such a slanderous context. Good libratarians enshrine the concept of choice only for freedom to avoid repercussions of biological fun and games, not for obedience to vital government directives.
But it must never again go down the dark path of denying this choice to millions of Americans.”
Harsh words 3 years after the fact. So brave.
"choice" can only be effective when it results in a dead baby.
The government argues that this dominance reflects anticompetitive practices...
In other news, we're trying to keep an opposition presidential candidate from running.
You know, there's a libertarian case for prosecuting the opposition candidate through novel legal theories.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) wants the government to investigate Elon Musk following news that he prevented Ukraine from accessing Starlink...
Big squaw demand positive right to smoke signal war party. Or something.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved an updated coronavirus vaccine, which is designed to counter the XBB.1.5 strain of omicron.
Of course they want to vaccinate against the off switch. We have a presidential election coming up.
Like earlier versions, they're expected to be most protective against COVID-19's worst consequences rather than mild infection...
Even these meager expectations will likely not be met.
Bonus: no way to prove it.
Did you get COVID after getting vax?
Yes - well it would have been worse had you not gotten vaxxed
No - Vax worked!
Did you spread COVID?
Yes - would have spread worse without the vax!
No - Vax worked!
After refusing vax, did you get COVID like everyone else?
Yes - SEE! YOU SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN VAXXED!
No - You probably low-key had it and spread it to grandma, grandma killer
This whole thing has been an exercise in unfalsifiable bullshit logic, and they keep having to change their story when its proven they were wrong, lying, or both.
Killing people is good ass long ass anti-vaxxers have their way in promoting anti-vaxism ass THE most fashionable of ALL Marks of Tribal Virtue!!!
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=~All+ages Just LOOK at the interactive graph right at the top of this link!!!! COVID deaths among the unvaccinated VASTLY outnumbered, and still outnumber, the deaths among the vaccinated!!!
https://www.businessinsider.com/conservative-radio-hosts-anti-maskers-death-covid-19-2021-9 At least 7 conservative radio hosts and anti-mask advocates have died from COVID-19 after bashing the vaccines Intergalactic or Cosmic-Karmic ironic coincidence, maybe? Or candidates for Darwin Awards?
BTW, I am STILL waiting for “the science” concerning sneeze guards at the salad bars, to be settled! Meanwhile, “R” party governors are getting ready for FORBIDDING sneeze guards at the salad bars!!!
Who volunteers to eat what MAY be infected mucus from strangers, on their salads, in double-blind, MASSIVELY statistically significant studies, to settle this, for once and for all? Because I just KNOW, oh so VERY well, that once the “science” is settled, there will be NO tribalistic ideologues who will dispute these findings! We are ALL data-driven now!
Sneeze guards on salad bars are mostly to make people feel better about it. I doubt they do much. Everything is covered in germs and we are constantly exposed to all kinds of things.
And when people do get sick from eating salads it’s always E. coli.
Yeah, and it's usually in sealed packages from the grocery store.
The cooties are safely sealed in! And grasshoppers and frogs and what-snot, too! (In the salads.)
Ye are correct about the "excessive sanitation" theory, and immune systems left unchallenged, and the "hormesis" theory. (Happy mediums are always cool though.) Casual search: https://www.beaumont.org/health-wellness/blogs/can-being-too-clean-weaken-your-immune-system#:~:text=of%20other%20conditions.-,Dr.,immune%20system%2C%E2%80%9D%20he%20said.
I do wonder if data I have previously read about here, is being repressed in the searches...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329757875_Sanitization_of_Early_Life_and_Microbial_Dysbiosis
Many studies have now established that infant exposure to excessive sanitation and hygiene regimens are associated with an increased risk for and onset of childhood immune system diseases.
Dysbiosis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"...This whole thing has been an exercise in unfalsifiable bullshit logic, and they keep having to change their story when its proven they were wrong, lying, or both..."
Fauci last week admitting masks did nothing for the individual, but worked 'in the general population'...
Wasn't it the other way around? He acknowledged that there is no evidence that they work at population level, but insisted they work at an individual level.
Either way, it's ballsy level BS.
"This whole thing has been an exercise in unfalsifiable bullshit logic, and they keep having to change their story when its proven they were wrong, lying, or both."
the biggest problem with the whole thing is that everything got filtered through politicians. politicians have a strong tendency to oversell things.
the second biggest problem is that the opposition is also political..... and has a strong tendency to exaggerate how much the first group is exaggerating.
neither side is limiting themselves to reality.
Pluggos booming economy
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-12/us-inflation-adjusted-incomes-fell-2-3-in-2022-from-prior-year#xj4y7vzkg
But it must never again go down the dark path of denying this choice to millions of Americans.
Sounds like a tall order.
Did I miss the link to the double blind testing of the new vaccine, or where we know the long term effects?
And, oh by the way, are the manufacturers still exempt from liability?
No. Yes.
Do we even need to know the long term effects when the short term effects aren't worth it?
What, specifically, are the short term effects that are not worth it?
Being sick for a week isn't enough?
OK, maybe that is how the vaccination affected you and you don't want the booster, but are you willing to let others have a choice about it?
Perhaps, for example, someone feels old and at risk of serious illness so they are willing to take a few days soreness in exchange for reducing risk. Or maybe they don't even have the strong reaction you have.
The thing is that there is no evidence to support the notion that the boosters will reduce risk.
I'm all for allowing people to try whatever medications they want. But the FDA declaring something to be safe and effective when they have no studies to back it up is basically lying.
>>>is basically lying
doing it for billions of dollars even worse.
This is why we need to mandate it for toddlers.
Nobody was talking about, or defending, mandating vaccines for toddlers. Is it that hard to stay on topic?
And yet, here it is
https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/COVID-19/Pages/when-can-kids-get-the-COVID-vaccine-or-booster.aspx
>>exempt from liability?
Moderna is sponsoring the new season of Jeopardy and in a delicious syringe of irony, Novak Djokovic had the "Moderna Shot of the Day" at the US Open on Sunday
If you are seriously that interested in knowing that level of detail, I'll help get you started. Here's the announcement of the FDA approval:
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-receive-us-fda-approval-2023-2024-covid
Pre-clinical data show that the updated COVID-19 vaccine generates improved neutralizing antibody responses against multiple circulating Omicron-related sublineages including XBB.1.5, BA.2.86 (Pirola), and EG.5.1 (Eris), which currently accounts for the largest portion of U.S. cases1
Pre-clinical data = cell culture models. Not really a gold standard for efficacy or safety in complete organisms. There are thousands of compounds that kill cancer cells in a dish but don't work at all in people.
we call it good enough when they update the flu vaccine every year.
The 40% effective guess at which flu strain it is yearly?
yup. the claim was efficacy and safety, not how bad the guess on which strain would be prevalent was. the flu vaccine works for the targeted strain and it is safe, and nobody has ever questioned this in the decades it has been done this same way.
antibody responses suggest that it might be effective. You need clinical trials in people to determine if it is effective and if the benefits outweigh risks. Which means, by the way, that you have to include every outcome that happens after anyone gets the vaccine, not just covid and not ignoring the 2 weeks after the injection.
The approval of this season’s COVID-19 vaccine is based on the full body of previous clinical, non-clinical, and real-world evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines by Pfizer and BioNTech. Further, the application included pre-clinical data showing this season’s vaccine substantially improved responses against multiple Omicron XBB-related sublineages, including XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, and XBB.2.3, compared to the Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine. Additionally, pre-clinical data demonstrate that serum antibodies induced by Omicron XBB.1.5-adapted monovalent COVID-19 vaccine, when compared to the Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine, effectively neutralize the recently emerged Omicron BA.2.86 (Pirola) and the globally dominant Omicron-related EG.5.1 (Eris) subvariant.
*previous*
Found the target audience of drug ads.
1 in 800 serious adverse events.
Oh, boy! An hour+ video!
As I've said before, there's a reason long-ass videos are conspiracy theorists best friends.
Transcript available for those who know how to internet.
He’s barely able to read.
Your comment contained a link and an excerpt of random dialog. What about giving a synopsis of why anyone should care enough to hunt down a transcript of this particular YouTube video?
… why anyone should care enough to hunt down a transcript of this particular YouTube video?
Those who object to long videos.
Even CA has limits:
"New poll finds California voters resoundingly oppose cash reparations for slavery"
[...]
"The UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll, co-sponsored by The Times, found that 59% of voters oppose cash payments compared with 28% who support the idea. The lack of support for cash reparations was resounding, with more than 4 in 10 voters “strongly” opposed.
"It has a steep uphill climb, at least from the public's point of view," said Mark DiCamillo, director of the IGS poll.
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers created California's Reparations Task Force in 2020 with the goal of establishing a path to reparations that could serve as a model for the nation..."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/new-poll-finds-california-voters-resoundingly-oppose-cash-reparations-for-slavery/ar-AA1gvbGb
Newsom's on a roll; want it fucked up? Hand it to grease-ball.
Far right California strikes again.
Whether they oppose it or not is immaterial; the establishment in the state supports it, so that's what's going to happen, just as it did with Prop 187 and Prop 8, because they know the voters won't punish them for going against the "popular" will.
Everyone hating it is even more reason to do it.
Voters? Since when do Democrats listen to voters?
Just to clarify, "voters" are not the same as "votes".
Reparations should consist of one ticket for a free ride on the bullet train. One way.
But can Gavin's hair beat Robby's hair?
HOW DARE YOU!
>>Former Attorney General William Barr said
nothing credible.
>>The Biden administration has reached a prisoner exchange deal with Iran.
we're finally giving Valarie Jarrett back?
>>Will student loan repayments resume as part of the debt ceiling deal?
if I refuse to pay will the government shut down?
“Whistleblower claims CIA held an assessment with 7 experts on the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
6 of the 7 said they believed it was a lab leak. The CIA then tried to pay off the 6 experts to change their stance to natural event via Zoonosis!”
https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1701613757359903088
suppose is prudent to say yes when those guys offer a payout.
I don't know, it's not like if you say no they'll dose you with LSD without your knowledge or have you
killeddie in a "tragic accident" or something...>>dose you with LSD without your knowledge
always wanted to try theirs to test quality lol
Heh. Now I want to read something by Ken Kesey.
LOL, you might have the best screen name for this particular comment thread.
not an LSD thread w/o MK Ultra
LOL. "5 out of 5 dentists recommend against Crest toothpaste." - Colgate
Businesses are the consumers of Google's products, the the people who search with the search engine. They are harmed by Google's monopoly, in which Google sets the price per click and they get to decide if anyone knows your business exists. Pay them and you're in business, don't pay them and you're not.
No Google is not “preferred". There isn't a single product or company that America chooses not to use 90% of the time. It is statistically impossible. It's a monopoly.
we don't need 23 search engines.
Remember when Google search gave you actual, real world results baseball on actual internet traffic instead of profit and narrative driven marketing campaigns?
Based on actual results ^^^^^^
"anyone who wants them is free to take them. But it must never again go down the dark path of denying this choice to millions of Americans."
The choice between increasing chances of infecting others or lessening those chances.
News flash, the vaccine does not prevent transmission. Try to keep up.
News flash, modern medicine does not prevent death. Try to keep up.
(The use of ANY modern medicine is therefor a waste of time, effort, and money, and prominently displays your loyalty to the WRONG political Tribe!)
Now there are solutions that allow you to grow business, but I'd like to especially draw attention to call answering services. Don’t worry that call center employees will communicate with your clients using some standard phrases, because you can create a communication script that perfectly matches your business. Also you can estimate the effectiveness of such a service during a trial of 7 days.