Review: The Big Break Documents Trump's Washington
Washington Post reporter Ben Terris offers a fair treatment to both conservative and liberal activists in the Trump era.

In The Big Break, Ben Terris delivers a book-length undressing of D.C. strivers of the Trump era.
The Washington Post reporter enters the social lives and salons of characters such as Leah Hunt-Hendrix, a former Occupy Wall Street protester and granddaughter of a Texas oil tycoon. She set up shop in D.C. to fight Trumpism, but we mostly see her bemoaning the choices of other Democrats. For instance, Sam Bankman-Fried, at that point still a crypto billionaire, and his brother Gabe show up with their own opinions about primary candidates—to Hunt-Hendrix's irritation.
We also spend time with Matt Schlapp, who helped transform the Conservative Political Action Conference into a carnival for opportunists in Donald Trump's orbit, and we meet the ambitious little people who get pulled under by these large personalities when they change course, or even get arrested, as Sam Bankman-Fried did. Terris treats all of them fairly, which, in D.C., means no one comes across well.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why do I doubt that the marxist scum at WaPo did anything near a fair characterization here. Keep pimping for commies Reason.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
My same thought.
BOAF SIDEZ!
I’am making over $200 an hour working online with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 18k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .And best thing is..It’s so Easy..Copy below website to check it………….
———————————————-➤ http://Www.Coins71.Com
> carnival for opportunists
Yup, that sort of describes the new CPAC. There is not guiding ideology or viewpoint, it just jamming everyone into the same room. It's no longer "conservative" as that's too small of a tent to fit everyone, rather it's "Team Red and anyone closely orbiting it". So less ideological but more partisan than the old CPAC.
“Less ideological but more partisan” doesn’t make sense
Certainly it does. It's a question of tribal identification and purpose. A group may have a strong sense of the purpose and philosophy of the group - ideology - but are not particularly hostile to non-members. Another group may have no particular coherent philosophy but are hostile to non-members - and indeed, hostility to non-members on the basis of their ideologies or characteristics may be the unifying factor. "We may not agree on policies but we hate the same people" may work perfectly well.
But this is obvious.
"So less ideological but more partisan"
That seems, paradoxical.
Less ideological, but more partisan is a really good way to put it.
Washington Post reporter ... offers a fair treatment
lol ok.