Biden Aims To Give Federal Workers Largest Pay Increase in 40 Years
The White House plans to boost federal workers' pay by 5.2 percent, the largest increase since 1980.

Federal employees are set to receive the largest pay increase in four decades, courtesy of President Joe Biden.
In a letter sent to Congress last week, Biden called for a 5.2 percent overall pay increase for federal workers—the same increase that he'd included in his budget plan that was sent to Congress earlier this year. Biden said the huge pay increase was necessary so the federal government could "attract, recruit, and retain a skilled workforce with fair compensation in order to keep our government running, deliver services, and meet our nation's challenges today and tomorrow."
Technically, the pay increase will be divided into two separate categories. Federal workers would receive a 4.7 percent across-the-board pay raise, combined with a 0.5 percent bump in so-called locality pay. Because the amount of a federal employee's locality pay varies from place to place based on the cost of living, the actual pay increases might not be the same for all workers.
It would be the biggest increase since federal workers received a 9.1 percent pay raise in 1980 during the waning days of the Carter administration, according to Government Executive, a trade publication for federal employees. As Government Executive notes, some members of Congress have been pushing for an even larger increase in federal employee compensation: A group of Democrats introduced a bill earlier this year to boost federal workers' wages by 8.7 percent.
In fairness, private-sector wages have been rising steadily in recent months too—wages were up 4.6 percent for the 12 months ending in June, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In recent months, pay increases have even started to outpace inflation, which has cooled after running at rates not seen since the 1980s.
Still, Biden's decision to push for higher federal wages is a bit awkward at the current moment. One obvious reason is that the federal government ran a budget deficit of more than $1.6 trillion during the first 10 months of the current fiscal year. The deficit is already significantly larger than last year, and is on pace to keep growing. There probably aren't many businesses that would be handing out pay raises during a year where they were that deep in the red—but, hey, it's a lot easier to do that when you're dealing with other people's money.
For that matter, how many private-sector workers would get an automatic pay increase for not even bothering to show up? As of March, the Government Accountability Office found daily office occupancy rates of less than 25 percent across 17 federal agencies.
Certainly, some federal workers (like many in the private sector) can do their jobs remotely, but it's becoming clear that many are overusing the privilege. Last month, Biden's chief of staff called on top federal officials to "aggressively execute" plans to get federal workers back into the office, Axios reported at the time.
Many federal workers don't seem to be taking the directives well. Jesus Soriano, a program director at the National Science Foundation (NSF), told NPR this week that a new mandate requiring NSF workers to spend at least eight days per month in the office was "heartbreaking." Soriano says forcing federal workers back into the office will limit which experts agencies like the NSF can recruit.
That seems fine. If workers can earn better pay and more flexibility in the private sector, then they should put their talents to use doing something other than working for the government.
And for federal workers who are upset about having to shuffle into the office a few more times each month, at least there will be even fatter paychecks to ease the blow.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh, I'm sure they deserve it...
Hey, they guided us through the Covid crisis without any collateral damage….
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Everyone else gets raises? Why not federal workers?
I'm sure you are just oh-so-special and deserve your raise though.
Everyone else does productive things.
Federal workers already make about 30% more on average than the average citizen dumdum. They used to be public servants.
Not at the upper levels. Those are underpaid.
Lol. Parody.
Well Fauci obviously.
I’am making over $200 an hour working online with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 18k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .And best thing is..It’s so Easy..Copy below website to check it………….
———————————————-➤ http://Www.Coins71.Com
Congratulations on being another idiot conservative who thinks that government is exempt from labor markets, and doesn't understand confounding in economic analyses. Federal pay is higher r employee because a much higher fraction of federal government jobs require advanced training -- it has far more scientists, engineers, lawyers, and economists. If you compare what the federal government pays such people it is much lower than the private sector and even is lower than nonprofit work such as in academia. And the private sector offers profit sharing and stock options that the federal government doesn't offer. And the private sector doesn't have periodic shutdowns that the Republicans keep forcing. The government is also limited by the fact that it can't hire immigrants who haven't become US citizens. 5.2% is nowhere nearly enough to make the federal government competitive. If you hate free makets, you don't have a problem with this.
The job opening may require an advanced degree, but that doesn't really mean that an advanced degree is needed to do the job. Many are engaged in useless 'research' that produces essentially meaningless results, and the same research is conducted multiple times. I really don't need a government study to tell me that monkey poop stinks, or that tropical plants require more water. If the work these people are doing had real value, there would be private sector demand. RE: periodic shutdowns... Those end up being vacations because federal employees are ultimately paid for that time. Most federal employees also still receive a defined benefit pension. Way too much of what you've said is simply wrong or misleading to cover in a single response, so I'll leave it at that.
Thankyew, thankyew, thankyew very much. I’m not an idiot. I agree – No Federal employee should have to live on less than $100,000 year, and it could be argued that none of them should make more than $101,000 [exclusive of foreign, under-the-table payments, of course]. Now, wouldn’t that be all nice and equitable? That includes the military from private to full 4-star general. I would be amenable to granting an exception to the upper income limit for the mistresses of presidents or their sons. And while we're at it, shouldn't there being a hiring moratorium on Caucasians and Asiatic/Pacific Islanders?
And yet somehow the government has been able to recruit lawyers and economists when the deal has always been that you get paid less than a comparable private sector job, but have better job security and pension and often early retirement.
Found the guy who's never had to deal with government employees slow walking every one of their job duties.
Way to admit to massive inflation without admitting to massive inflation.
Because they are fucking parasites.
Because we get them regardless of performance. As a fed I can tell you most don’t deserve them and many deserve to be fired. You have no clue. Even one of the “best” agencies that I work is bloated and purposefully inefficient. That’s government in action. At least we have required in office work for over a year but that’s only a minor positive. Locality pay is BS in most parts of the country, sorry. And why should feds get near unalienable job security and higher pay/benefits? I repeat. You have no clue.
4 years of hard The Resistance is worth a pay raise.
This should do wonders for our alnost $2 trillion annual deficit!
"When we all do better, we all do better!"
No problem. I guess you haven't heard of MMT.
Why does Dr. Jill’s husband hate federal workers? Even greedy capitalist GM is offering union auto workers 10% and that’s not close to what the union is demanding. Absent a promotion, how many of us ever saw a 5.2% raise in our private sector careers?
My employer gave everyone a 10% raise last year to make up for inflation.
Certainly not because you were doing a good job.
He finally moved to glass bottle vodka.
UAW goonion idiots want 46% more money to screw in a bolt.
https://www.npr.org/2023/09/07/1197884540/unions-strike-wages-uaw-automakers-detroit
And a 32 hour work week.
That's either very small workers or a very large bolt. 🙂
So funny I busted a nut laughing.
Those of us working in the early seventies saw raises above that level.
Of course, inflation was 12%.
Jesus Soriano, a program director at the National Science Foundation (NSF), told NPR this week that a new mandate requiring NSF workers to spend at least eight days per month in the office was "heartbreaking."
Who are we to question The Science?
Jesus fucking christ!
Jesus Fucking Soriano. Fixed it for you.
https://www.federalpay.org/employees/national-science-foundation/soriano-molla-jesus-v
"In 2022, Molla Jesus V. Soriano was a Program Manager at the National Science Foundation in Alexandria, Virginia. Soriano began working at the National Science Foundation in 2012 with a starting salary of $163,957. Since then, Soriano's salary has increased to $196,719 in 2022."
Fuck this guy with a rusty chainsaw, and fuck whoever runs raspberrydinners.
"In 2022, Molla Jesus V. Soriano was a Program Manager at the National Science Foundation in Alexandria, Virginia. Soriano began working at the National Science Foundation in 2012 with a starting salary of $163,957. Since then, Soriano’s salary has increased to $196,719 in 2022.”
This fucker should have his held under water until the bubbles stop.
Frankly, that isn't very good. A 20% raise over 10 years isn't that great. That's like a 1.8% CAGR.
That said, if they were getting work form home and only 8 days a month in the office, plus the guarantee of work for 10 years, that's a good alternative to a raise.
Here comes the monaaaaaaay; here comes the money
Money money money money money money money money money
Dolla dolla
Dolla dolla
Ching ching
Bling Bling
At the check out
If you ain't talkin' money
Then your talkin' don't matter
Ching ching
Bling Bling
Packin' Pocket
You make the dolla, dolla
Can't a damn soul stop it
Amend the proposal to cut the federal work force by a concomitant amount.
Ok, the "not showing up for work" part of this article is pretty much not appropriate for Reason to calling out. For many years Reason has had plenty of articles showing the benefits of telework, but somehow when we're talking about Federal workers then if they aren't in the office they aren't working? Not an appropriate double-standard, especially since all of the reasons why telework is generally a good thing apply when the position is appropriate for it (and lets face it lots of government workers are just pushing paper so unless they are interfacing with the public then a lot of those jobs can, and should, be telework positions).
Don't forget about the cost savings of less infrastructure being required to have offices, so less rent (lost of federal jobs are not in federally owned property, but leased), lower power bills, less wasted time spent in commuter traffic, etc. While I can agree we could do with a lot fewer Federal jobs (and agencies, etc.) and far lower Federal budget, calling out the one thing that actually saves money as a bad thing? Really? You guys can definitely do better than that.
Get a real job.
The teleworking feds aren't actually working. Wait times for citizens have exploded. IRS just deleted millions of records instead of working them.
The teleworking feds aren’t actually working.
FTFY. If you need a gun to get me to pay you, you ain't working - your robbing.
Failed on the strike , damn italics.
Was wondering what the change was lol.
IRS just deleted millions of records instead of working them.
Wait, how is that not a feature?
The Biden records?
Which federal bureaucracy actually got rid of a building? I'm willing to bet they are all still sitting there empty. Heated or cooled to 70 degrees F. Wasting resources. Destroying the planet.
Easiest fix, demand all fed return to the office and het the building to 70 deg c. Come back in a day
I like the mandated 70 degrees c idea.
Which federal bureaucracy actually got rid of a building?
And I guarantee you they're still paying rent on those buildings, so those supposed cost savings? Non-existent.
It wasn't a strong point especially when the covid years accelerated an existing trend to work from home. A better point there would be to talk about productivity, efficiency, and fraud. I would assume a lot of these government employees are doing significantly less work at home while lowering costs (commute, meals, etc.) and having received better compensation already. I'd actually support those positions being work from home that can be securely done in such a manner. It should reduce a ton of overhead costs and create an efficiency opportunity to shrink the government workforce. Of course that is a pipe dream and we'll see fraud/corruption regardless.
This article might as well be summarized with "fuck you, cut spending"
Eliminate the education department, dump the IRS staff increase, eliminate the labor department, HUD, CDC, NIH, all "arts" funding, and then give the survivors a full 6% based solely on hours worked in the office.
Net savings.
You are way too kind.
Congress can say no or something?
Actually the Republican House just might. Contrary to all the COVID spending.
I work as a federal employee and I can tell you largely the pay increase is deserved obviously the federal government has a huge problem with employees who don't want to work and milk the salary and benefits, but they also massively underpay the employees who keep things going. A reevaluation of the workforce is really what is needed rather than paying at least 2 people for a job easily done by one just pay the one guy a competitive wage to do it. But most of the federal jobs exist so politician x can say they created loads of new jobs in their district for reelection.
So, take the same pot of money, but trim the workforce so that the survivors get more pay?
Fewer federal workers would ultimately save money in the long run on benefits and retirement pay, right?
Youre not underpaid thief. You wouldn’t last a year in private industry.
Federal workers received an average of 17 percent more total compensation than comparable private sector workers.
.
A 2010 study by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics found that full-time private industry workers worked an average of 12 percent more hours per year than full-time state and local government workers.
https://fee.org/articles/a-look-at-pay-for-federal-employees-compared-to-their-private-sector-counterparts/
You are literally overpaid.
Depends on the function. In the medical field, the pay isn't competitive at all. If you want to know why the VA largely sucks, it isn't just because of the FWA or bureaucracy in general, it's because they have a hard time filling jobs at the regular GS pay scales due to non-government hospitals paying far more on a comparative basis. A lot of positions that sit empty in government are the ones that require real, actual skills, and those people can get more working in the private sector. The organizations try to apply for waivers or exceptions due to mission degradation, but that rarely gets pushed through.
It is why I stick to averages and not isolated sectors. I work with fed workers constantly. They don’t compare to my industry at all and on average make more. This is for engineering. I’m constantly training my government counterparts up in engineering and even their own policies and requirements using their documents. They are a bet drain and a bunch of know nothings.
Current counterpart grew so tired of me defending my teams work citing their own government documents, they eventually took the documents down. We later find he was denigrating our work in order to ask for more money for his office.
If you are private sector in the engineering field and paid less then GS, then you are even more underpaid then they are.
Ahh. A know nothing parody. Guess how gov contracts work.
Nope. My fed agency on the GS scale raids our contractors all the time for engineers. We just hired several from one of the so called top one. And they are very skilled. Clearly the general view of low government pay needs to be put in the garbage,
Yup. Idiot conservatives who claim to love capitalism but actually hate free markets.
The problem is that there's no incentive to drop deadweight. What benefit does a department get if it streamlines the workers? A smaller budget. That's the reward. Anyone got any ideas for better incentives?
Get rid of some of your staff, or you will be out on the street.
I think the only thing you can do is the GE 2% rule. Cut your bottom 2% every year.
This is hard enough in regular corporations. Every company I have been a part of has tried to do this whole “We are requiring you to reauthorize your budget this year” thing and it never, ever works. Shocker, the department of 20 people didn’t suddenly discover that it only needs 18 this year. No, they all have a reason why they need 22.
How does a company (or gov’t department) “Stay lean”? They make sure a person is always loaded with work, they avoid doing things that aren’t important, and they replace poor workers with better ones.
In growing companies this is easy- you just expand faster than you have people to expand: this ensures people are always loaded with work, and they figure out for themselves what things aren’t important. And the people who can’t do that are obvious, and you fire them. You need to have discipline to keep this up, because the second you try to “get ahead of the curve”, you start getting the parasites in that aren’t actually helping.
But in corporations that are shrinking, it is more difficult. You actually have more people than work, but no person is going to admit to that. The only thing you can do is cut the staff and force people to reallocate the work amongst themselves. Generally the downside here is that people often sluff off work that is needed but hard, instead of work that is easy but not necessary. The IT dept of the bank I am in probably has 20 non engineers for every staff engineer- compliance officers, project managers, managers, program managers, etc etc. It is absurd how many people and teams don’t actually ship code.
Fundamentally, government needs to do the shrinking thing. And that means even in a growing economy, have a mandated turnover rate for federal employees. Requiring every functional department to reduce expenses 5% per year through headcount reduction or budget savings is probably the only thing you can do. But that takes fortitude, and it also requires nuance. Different orgs will have different drivers and you need leaders comfortable navigating that complexity, not the leaders I've generally seen that feel they can get away pounding their fists on the table before knocking off early for the day.
It's also so that the Unions can collect more dues from Government employees. Then those dues go right back to the DNC.
Horseshit, now get back to work you feckless drain on society.
…obviously the federal government has a huge problem with employees who don’t want to work and milk the salary and benefits, but they also massively underpay the employees who keep things going…
Isn’t that how unions always work? You get paid by seniority and job title, and not by effectiveness?
In the private (non-union) economy, star employees can get promoted more rapidly, or given bigger bonuses and bigger raises, or given company stock. In the government, promotions, pay and bonus rules are set by the contract, and there is no company stock.
Look, the postliberals took notice of Reason and Remy and their views of federal worker perks and pay:
https://americanpostliberal.substack.com/p/beyond-the-laptop-class?r=y5f4o
Are these post liberal folks the type to latch on to some friendly sounding rhetoric, but cross into ‘aww, hell no’ territory when you see what they actually propose?
“Post-Liberal” just makes me think of “boncentration bamps”.
The "postliberals" are reactionary political Catholics.
That’s about what I figured. Thanks.
Everyone who works for the government should have their wages indexed to the compensation for jurors.
You oughta see the pay raise he gave Ukraine.
"attract, recruit, and retain a skilled workforce with fair compensation in order to keep our government running, deliver services, and meet our nation's challenges today and tomorrow."
Because the government has met our nation's challenges so well in the past? Please STOP trying to retain government employees, cancel all government "services" and eliminate 9 out of 10 unconstitutional Federal departments and the rules, regulations and spending they represent. Thanks awfully!
and eliminate 9 out of 10 unconstitutional Federal departments and the rules, regulations and spending they represent.
I have to disagree.
You don’t stop at 9 out of 10. Eliminate 10 out of 10 unconstitutional Federal departments and the rules, regulations and spending they represent.
+10000000000.... The actual right solution ^^^ HERE ^^^^.
*Adds Jesus Soriano to list of people to never, under any circumstances, hire*
I wonder what's it like to have so little shame, self awareness, and be so completely out of touch as to say something this breathtakingly stupid in public? It must feel good, just based on the amount of dumb asses who seem to revel in their stupidity.
Federal pay is woefully below private sector, especially in the professional jobs (i.e. lawyer, scientist, engineer). And the benefits are not what they used to be. It is also very hard to get pay raises for good performance. The pay needs to go up at least 25% to even come close.
It is also very hard to get pay raises for good performance.
Lol, what? That's not how fed salary structure works in the first place. GS pay levels are measured against a job classification matrix, and you get pay raises through step increases if you simply hold serve, or if you get a job in your career field with more responsibility. The best these guys get for performance is an annual bonus or time off.
If I do well, or I take on some additional responsibility, my management can not increase my salary like they could in the private sector.
“Could” isn’t “will”. Especially in union gigs where the management can just claim they don’t have the power.
Then those lawyers, scientists, engineers can seek a job in the private sector.
Unless they're too totally incompetent to do anything other than occupy a seat at the Federal feeding trough.
I literally posted the fucking analysis above retard.
That depends if the particular job, or agency, or department, is even needed.
The solution is to fire ALL of them and eliminate their jobs permanently. Any "services" the private sector can't handle don't need to be done in the first place.
Well then; WTF are all the federal employees doing there?
Go get a REAL job.
Federal pay used to be below the private sector, and workers exchanged somewhat lower pay for much better benefits and higher job security.
Now federal workers are among the highest paid in the country (it's not coincidence that salaries are highest in the D. of C.), and they still get gold-plated benefits, including pensions (almost completely gone in the private sector) and health care.
Cost of living increase for federal workers is not 'unfair' even if it seems untimely.
At their pay it isnt cost of living increases dumdum. They are raises. They aren’t min wage workers.
They are already overpaid.
For non-essential government workers (and there are many, routinely identified in previous government shutdowns), a -100% raise would be fair to all concerned. Save the taxpayers some additional debt accumulation, and let the workers go somewhere they are needed, in the private sector.
"Don't Make the Same COVID Mistakes Again"
Yes, lets make all new mistakes instead.
What? You don't expect them to get it right do you?
The fact is that many Federal employees do just similar to the private sector. A nurse in a VA hospital does work similar to a nurse in a private hospital. The fact is that with Medicare and Medicaid the feds may be paying the salary for both. So, it is not unreasonable that the feds need to occasionally adjust pay. It is also reasonable to suggest that some programs and their staff might be cut, but that is really as different issue. I general I would suggest that the government should have the smallest staff necessary to do a job and that that staff should be compensated at market value.
"A nurse in a VA hospital does work similar to a nurse in a private hospital."
Except a nurse in a VA hospital can't be fired if they kill a patient. Eliminate the VA hospital system and give the Vets who are entitled to medical care an insurance policy. The one who killed one of my patients one night by administering potassium solution IV push instead of slow drip was simply moved to another ward a week later.
1. There must be an election coming up.
2. (as always) fire every SES.
Yes!
I can't believe that I've been through this many comments and no one has figured out that this is Joey Sponge-brain Shits-pants effort to make sure federal employees vote for him.
He's just trying to buy their votes like he has been doing for the student-loan deadbeats.
His thought process doesn't go much higher than bribery.
Hey nice article Design Your Best Profile Picture: AI-Powered PFP Maker https://simplified.com/ai-profile-picture/
I for one am shocked that a regime endorsed by the nation's premier libertarian publication would expend taxpayer dollars to buy votes from government union members. But maybe it was worth it. Those DC juries made sure that anyone caught parading at the Capitol ended up in federal penitentiaries. Democracy secured!
Not paying federal employee union members enough to make sizable donations to the Democracy Party is a threat to democracy.
Largest pay raise in 40 years along with largest inflation in 40 years.
Biden's screwed federal workers. Prices up 17% vs. 11.5% Pay increase... so far. Why do Feds vote blue? Trump's raises kept pace with Inflation.
Because they've been doing such a great job?
And who says Biden never created any high-paying jobs? Besides the 87,000 new IRS agents, everyone in the federal government who wasn't highly paid soon will be.
Those 87000 IRS agents are 87000 votes for Democrats, because they know Republicans may fire them.
I work at NASA (yeah yeah we waste money) as a contractor. I started 26 yrs ago. When I started contractors had better salaries and health benefits. Civil Servants (CS) had job for life, and different pension.
Now - CS has it all. They make more than a contractor, they get vacation and sick bank that they can share with others. They still get the job for life and retire earlier. Seriously, it's incredibly hard to first a CS. I can't even remember it happening.
At least at JSC, they require you to be in the office 3 days a week. They do have telework from Boston or CO for some CS, which contractors can't do.
Absolutely.
Work HARDER slaves. UR over-lord SPENDERS need a pay-raise because they work so hard spending your money.
Wouldn't it be great if everyone could just fire these F'En spenders and decide for themselves what to buy.
Why it's almost like a gas station attendant poking a gun at it's customers threatening them that if they don't buy thousands of $ worth of product in their store they'll shoot you or lock you in there dungeon. Oh wait; Yea; It's exactly that.
Work at home should be renamed play at him. That would be more accurate.
I have a better plan. Fire 90% of them instead
In other news, cost of consumer goods is expected to rise 5.2%
Federal employees will be no better or worse off than before. The private sector, as usual, can continue to get stuffed as Big Gov finishes strangling the middle class to death.
But that's why inflation is so pernicious: federal workers, state workers, welfare recipients, and retirees--i.e., most of the Democratic voter base--are protected from it, at tax payer expense.
Private employees and small businesses bear the brunt of it, i.e., Republican voters.
That's why Democrats love inflation and like to produce more of it.
I don't have a problem with the raise. I have a problem with the irresponsible spending that pushed up inflation which in turn provided a justification for that raise.
Those votes don't buy themselves.
And every additional federal worker he hires is an additional vote for the Democrats.
It works just like any other socialist country and banana republic.
That is belw inflation, and it means a real pay cut, no? And are low and mid level civil servants really overpaid?
The real problem is how many they are and how little bang Americans seem to get for their buck. Per capita, Californians pay fifty per cent more in taxes than in high tax Sweden. And in Sweden they get good infrastructure, free schooling and higher education, the reassurance that unfortunate events in their lives do not spell devastation, and almost “free” universal healthcare with better outcomes than in the US, albeit with poorer service. And although climate obsessed, most energy already comes from hydro and nuclear, so less of a problem to fix…