Joe Biden's Email Aliases Are a Potentially Serious Transparency Problem
Multiple administrations have allowed senior officials to use alias email accounts. The practice undermines the Freedom of Information Act and encourages secrecy.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has more than 5,000 potential emails from three aliases President Joe Biden used while serving in the Obama administration, according to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed Monday.
The New York Post first reported in 2021 that Biden used at least three pseudonyms—"Robin Ware," "Robert L. Peters," and "JRB Ware"—on emails that mixed family and government business. The aliases were reportedly discovered in emails found on Hunter Biden's infamous laptop.
The Southeastern Legal Foundation, a legal nonprofit group, filed a FOIA request in June 2022 for all emails associated with the aliases. In its initial response to SLF's FOIA request, NARA said it had identified roughly 5,400 records potentially responsive to its request. However, NARA has yet to turn over those records. On Monday, the SLF filed a FOIA lawsuit to compel production.
"All too often, public officials abuse their power by using it for their personal or political benefit. When they do, many seek to hide it," SLF General Counsel Kimberly Hermann said in a press release. "The only way to preserve governmental integrity is for NARA to release Biden's nearly 5,400 emails to SLF and thus the public. The American public deserves to know what is in them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R–Ky.) also asked the National Archives earlier this month to turn over the records. The House Oversight Committee has been investigating Biden's business affairs and allegations of influence peddling. Biden has insisted that he maintained an "absolute wall" between family business and government affairs.
Whether or not those emails contain government business or evidence of impropriety that Republicans have been searching for, the use of multiple pseudonymous email addresses and aliases, at the very least, creates suspicion for FOIA requesters. How are watchdog groups and records requesters supposed to know the government is performing complete searches if the existence of alternate or private email addresses isn't revealed?
However, despite criticisms from transparency groups, the practice has been fairly widespread for at least the past few administrations. Obama-era EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson used the alias "Richard Windsor" and her private email address in messages with lobbyists. Former Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch also used alias email addresses. Trump-Era EPA administrator Scott Pruitt had four government email addresses.
The Obama administration defended using alternate government email addresses as necessary for high-level political appointees since the flood of emails to their public inboxes made those accounts unreasonable to manage.
At a 2013 press conference, then-White House press secretary Jay Carney assured reporters that "this is a practice consistent with prior administrations of both parties, and, as the story itself made clear, any FOIA request or congressional inquiry includes a search in all of the email accounts used by any political appointee."
Carney also stressed that the officials still used government email addresses, not private ones. "It is obviously counseled very clearly that we do not use and should not use private email accounts for work," he continued.
NARA guidance is clear that private email should not be used for government business except in extraordinary circumstances. If it is, the messages should be promptly forwarded to an official account for archiving.
A couple of years later, the scintillating topic of email retention policies became the crux of a presidential election and a significant contributor to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's defeat. Despite Democrats' attempts to wave away Clinton's private email server scandal with "but her emails," it was an intentional and serious mishandling of public records, for which Clinton refused to take responsibility until it became clear that it was a significant political liability.
The details of the server scandal have receded into the partisan fog of history, but it's helpful to remember that it wasn't just Clinton. State Department employee and Clinton aide Huma Abedin also had an account on the private server. And although Clinton aide Philippe Reines fiercely denied (to myself and roughly a dozen other reporters) using private email for work, he later turned over 20 boxes of emails from a private account in response to a FOIA lawsuit against the State Department.
Two of Biden's three known email aliases were private Gmail accounts. In one email published by The Daily Mail, Hunter Biden emailed one of those private accounts to push for then-deputy White House counsel John McGrail to get a job in the Treasury Department. Biden responded, "Re Johnny call me right away Dad."
As I said, it's unknown what NARA's tranche of emails contains or whether those private Gmail accounts were included. But if their haul involves government business, it will be a major political headache for Biden—of his own making.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Throw him in a jail cell with Trump, Obama, Bush, Hillary, and Cheney. Just 1 cell for all of them; no better punishment can I think of than them being forced to look at and listen too each other - every waking day.
I like this idea for other reasons too. Give politicians with Secret Service protection a choice: live on your own with no protection, or live in a secure compound with all the other ex-politicians who want SS protection.
How the fuck did we get to the point where these motherfuckers get 24/7 protection on our dime like some kind of goddamn nobility.
Good way to get everyone but Clinton killed.
Shit I forgot Bill. Throw him in too, be funny to see which Clinton is the one left standing.
Bill would ask for the juvenile detention center. Same with Joe.
I'm not sure about that. She'd have to get her own hands dirty and I'm pretty sure she usually hires professionals when she needs someone taken care of.
It’s ok for a guy to say she’s the most likely to become someone’s bitch in order to get someone else, killed, right? Is she still taking it back and owning it like it’s a universally good thing or did self-awareness finally set in?
I mean, I’d call her a manipulative, evil cunt either way. I just want to temper such statements based on whether she’s going to take it as a compliment or not.
Works for me man!
No clue why this "common practice" is allowed at all. Government employees, elected, appointed, or union, should be required to use public forums and systems for ALL public duties. Period.
Having this be a manner to avoid FOIA et al, and obscure transparency is unacceptable. You ... work for us. Period. We do not live within your unilateral bounds, public servant. Everything you do, you do for us.
The whole point of Biden’s email aliases was to cover his tracks related to criminal enterprises where he committed treason for money.
I mean, if taking bribes and influence peddling, actual instead of implied quid pro quo, and all of the other graft that hiding the emails facilitated don't count, I suppose we can agree that secret email aliases for public officials are bad.
The next thing we know, some fanatics will claim Biden should disclose all the people who met with him in secret when he was "vacationing" in Delaware.
Who are they trying to kid? Themselves? Yes.
“We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying.” - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
"it was an intentional and serious mishandling of public records, for which Clinton refused to take responsibility until it became clear that it was a significant political liability."
When did she ever accept responsibility? She STILL sells "But her emails" merchandise.
Hillary Clinton is a fucking cunt. The day she dies will be declared a national holiday.
I for one will be playing "Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead" from The Wizard of Oz all day when that happens.
She's never taken responsibility for having the easily-hacked servers in her fucking bathroom.
And so few seemed to realize why what she did is so much worse than even what Biden is accused of doing.
Biden's emails CAN be subpoenaed. GMail accounts are owned and run by Google, after all.
Hillary's PERSONAL email server does not have that option. She deletes emails and there is zero ability to subpoena anything.
What she did is markedly worse than anybody else, ever, in that regard.
Also, using the Trump precedent, should we have the FBI storm NARA and seize the docs they refuse to turn over via FOIA?
Also, using the Trump precedent, should we have the FBI storm NARA and seize the docs they refuse to turn over via FOIA?
Not to disagree but, again, Clinton was never POTUS. Or VPOTUS.
It was "two for one", remember?
Biden is a corrupt, lying piece of shit. The whole family are a bunch of degenerates. I would love to see any one of them go to prison.
Imagine the mental gymnastics it takes for a "joUrNaLisT" to avoid the obvious conclusions about Biden and his son and Burisma and the emails and all of it. Genuinely impressive.
It's funny how all the 'non-partisan' media who breathlessly reported on every allegation against Trump won't say anything until we get video of Hunter handing a Joe an envelope labeled 'Chinese Bribe Money'.
Even with the video, they will spin it as fake, or not convincing. I would think it's a sack with $$$ on it.
I would think it’s a sack with $$$ on it.
Tetragonal box with a wire-metal handle. Then, you'll be a racist for assuming it's a bribe in the first place.
Heck there is video of an east asian country handing Gore a check so that Bill Clinton would make the cleanest burning coal fields in teh U.S. into national parks to take them out of competition with their coal. Yet nothing happened there also we have video of Biden bragging about withholding money from Ukraine unless they fire the guy investigating his sons's company. there are no laws for democrats only for those who think differently.They are blind to proof
"Joe Biden's Email Aliases Are a Potentially Serious Transparency Problem"
Golly Reason, why ever would Robert L. Peters be using aliases?
Any guesses?
No?
That would involve intellectual curiosity, or any concern over the blatant criminal activities of the president.
They are waiting and working on the Boaf Sidez angle
Transparency is the only problem. Not Joe using the aliases to coordinate with Hunter regarding his business interests.
And good for Reason mentioning Hillary, but bad for forgetting about the classified documents on the server.
"Potentially", CJ? There's no "potentially" about it. Biden's email aliases are a huge problem no matter which way you try to slice it. This is the sort of shit that real journalists, had they actually been interested in the 2020 Democrat Presidential candidate, would've found out about sometime between June and October 2020 instead of cheerleading the man on and whining about "mean tweets".
This is the sort of shit that real journalists, had they actually been interested in the 2020 Democrat Presidential candidate, would’ve found out about sometime between June and October 2020
"RuShAN dIsInFoRmAtIoN!111!!!1!!!!!11!!! DERP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
"However, despite criticisms from transparency groups, the practice has been fairly widespread for at least the past few administrations. Obama-era EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson used the alias "Richard Windsor" and her private email address in messages with lobbyists. Former Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch also used alias email addresses. Trump-Era EPA administrator Scott Pruitt had four government email addresses."
Per the article you linked, Pruitt's addresses were all on official government servers, and readily identifiable as his containing either his name, his initials, or something that could be personally linked to him (one was a reference to the Oklahoma Sooners). Are you aware of any other Republicans who used aliases to conduct official business?
That really does seem like a weak attempt to both-sides it. But I would still be surprised if they can’t find Republican administration officials who have done this.
The only other example I've been able to find is Bush's EPA Administrator, Christine Todd Whitman used 'ToWhit' as an email address, which again doesn't seem to be an attempt to conceal her identity. The media is pretty aggressive when it comes to reporting on Republicans, if there were a lot of examples of this, the media would be trumpeting about them now instead of ignoring this story and hoping it goes away.
Did just find that six Trump White House staffers used private email addresses to conduct government business.
Cite?
This is what he’s talking about, I believe:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/352384-six-trump-officials-used-personal-email-accounts-for-white-house/
I can’t find anything in this article about the staffers involved using aliases or attempting to hide their identities. It seems like media and watchdog groups had pretty effective access, as well.
EDIT: Props to The Hill on this story as well, for pointing out how this is different from Hillary's near-exclusive use of a private email server under her personal control.
Yes, that is a valid cite. Note that I didn’t claim above that anyone used aliases.
That is what we're talking about here, though. The use of aliases. It seems to have been common practice during The Most Transparent Administration In History.
Using a personal email for government business isn't ideal but there are rules governing doing so, and I don't see any reason to think these Trump officials didn't follow them (the FBI, even when nominally under Trump's authority, certainly never had any qualms about investigating or prosecuting Trump associates on any other grounds).
Cite? and No videos.
Gosh Mike, were those emails being used to sell out the office of president for cash. You know, like Biden did?
thank you for shining the light. something > nothing
>>Multiple administrations have allowed senior officials to use alias email accounts.
all guilty of the same thing then.
I guess we should be thankful Biden used alias emails instead of meeting in parking garages.
The one does not preclude the other - - - - - - -
also this is a good sign for the future. when you've lost CNN, the AP and Reason you might be in trouble
At this point, Biden's indiscretions may be too big and too much to just sweep under the proverbial rug.
No they're not. The Democrats have a very big rug, and the corporate media are exceptionally obliging housemaids.
If Biden is on his way out its because they want him out. Not that they need him out.
The Democrats and their media lackeys have too much invested in the 'Joe Biden returned integrity to the White House!' narrative to let him go down for this.
They can't even drum up a sex scandal like they did with Andrew Cuomo to keep people from looking too closely at everyone he got killed by filling nursing homes with Covid patients.
If they decide to get rid of Joe it'll be for some health related reason, or they'll have him whacked by a MAGA patsy to justify implementing martial law.
Nobody's perfect. But, relatively speaking...
That would set off a revolution. Which would result in the extermination of the left.
If Biden is on his way out its because they want him out. Not that they need him out.
Salvaging another “historic moment” with Kamala in the White House when the Democrats decide to end the Biden family shit-show is probably the plan going forward.
Biden's handlers want to get rid of him because he's old. It's Newsome next.
Than CNN, AP,and Reason will go back to the nest. Republican presidents are evil Nazis...except Orange man who is the devil.
Reason probably has a poster of Biden that they bow to because they love his immigration policy.
My latest conspiracy theory:
They dump Feinstein, anoint Harris as CA senator, put Newsome in as VP; Biden is suddenly discovered to be senile and gets the 25th, and Newsome is Prez without a bothersome election.
Then next November, as the incumbent, he is fortified as president for life.
This only works if the Repubs nominate Trump, of course.
Carry on!
Any Republican nominee will instantly be declared ‘literally Hitler, and simultaneously ‘worse than Hitler’.
Democrats are filth and have no integrity.
You forgot the “clingers” epithet.
Also, they’re going to shit on whoever the Republican nominee is. Reference any shrike post to see what they’ll use against Nikki Haley or Tim Scott.
Biden never had Reason to lose.
there is a literal cite saying different.
also this is a good sign for the future. when you’ve lost CNN, the AP and Reason you might be in trouble
Politically, for Americans broadly, sure. For Reason, probably time to start brushing up on your coding skills when it becomes clear your top-down benefactor's political bias lags behind CNN.
I think I saw Emma published in something national she may have an out
She could also get a staffer job as a propagandist for someone like AOC. She would fit right in.
First- no 'Trump' in the article congrats.
"Joe Biden's Email Aliases Are a Potentially Serious Transparency Problem"
Potentially!! It is a serious problem. The only reason Biden/Dems in general do this is to not be transparent. There is a story just today about Whitmer doing this too.
Most Transparent President ever! Right?
You do realize it's against the law as a government official. We would be in jail
Trump-Era EPA administrator Scott Pruitt had four government email addresses.
Except for that one.
3 addresses that were variations on his name/initials and a Sooners reference, none using fake names.
Key word there is “government”, ATM.
Unfortunately, this story hasn’t gone into how many of the 5400+ email aliases were government emails and how many were pseudonyms.
I’m sure you can agree that one is fundamentally different from the other.
Potentially -
Adverb
potentially (comparative more potentially, superlative most potentially)
1. In a manner showing much potential; with the possibility of happening in a given way.
2. (obsolete) Powerfully, strongly.
I guess we are going with option 2?
Joe Biden's Email Aliases Are a Potentially Serious Transparency Problem
No fucking shit.
"Despite Democrats' attempts to wave away Clinton's private email server scandal with "but her emails," it was an intentional and serious mishandling of public records, for which Clinton refused to take responsibility until it became clear that it was a significant political liability."
And by take responsibility you mean Hillary had the drives destroyed, right?
She took responsibility for it by avoiding any consequences, making any corrections or reparations, and avoiding any degree of accountability. That’s what take responsibility means, right?
It’s the equivalent of prefacing your insults with “No offense, but….”
Was just reading more about McGrail. Sounds like it was vice versa from what Ciarmella wrote above: the guy was working at the Treasury, and Hunter fixed him up with a job as Joe’s deputy counsel.
And he was later promoted to counsel. Then went back to the Treasury after the Obama Administration.
[Disclaimer: Don’t think this comment needs one. If anything, the only way to interpret it is that I am biased against Biden.]
Disclaimer: I don’t understand why you add a disclaimer when you admit you think it is pointless.
Disclaimer: I have never, to my recollection, ended my comments with a disclaimer prior to this one.
You missed an exchange between me and Spiritus Mundi the other day. To make a long story short, he is checking up on me to make sure I include a disclaimer in every single comment I post.
Also, I explained that if Spiritus, or anyone else, doesn’t see a disclaimer on my comment they should search my ancestor comments on that thread for a disclaimer, because there is an inheritance relationship.
Reason: silent on $20 million in bribes, on half a century of lies.
But, oh my, an E-mail alias that is archived by NARA, that is like the worst!
You people need to get your priorities straight.
She said “potentially”, as in this alias issue could potentially, eventually, force them to acknowledge the generations-deep, administration-to-party-to-administration, system-wide international corruption.
What more do you want from them?
I wonder if trump's lawyers could use as a valid defense that there was an established precedent of policy that destruction of electronic evidence by deleting the contents of entire servers didn't constitute an obstruction crime that "any federal prosecutor would pursue" in relation to any charges arising from his (allegedly) having ordered the deletion of CCTV footage from Mar-a-Lago.
After all, HRC actually did delete records which either had been or were about to be subpoenaed by Congress and Comey determined that no prosecutor would dream of going after her for any crimes. Even after re-construction of some of what had been deleted showed that thousands of "relevant" emails which she hadn't disclosed per the records act were on the drives she had wiped and destroyed. How many crimes are there on the books for which an "attempted" version of the activity is deemed more severe of an offense than actually having carried it out?
Did Trump have any legal obligation to preserve the Mar-A-Lago footage in the first place? I would think that absent a court order to the contrary, it would be his property to do whatever the hell he wanted with.
I've never heard of any other business being required to preserve CCTV security footage indefinitely.
Do you hear what you're saying?
You make a good point.
But why didn't Trump have her prosecuted?
It's a bad look prosecuting your political enemies. Trump did the right thing by choice or circumstance.
It is odd, though, that the 50-year political veteran and dude who was going to "Restore our norms" is the one engaging in this fascist activity.
"We had to go Fascist to stop Fascism!"
Walls closing in??
Hunter Biden's Laptop ... the gift that keeps on giving! Sometimes getting secret information about government official corruption shines a light on a problem that needs correcting; and sometimes it is an avalanche ... or a deluge ... that boggles the mind and makes me want to throw up my hands in despair! The deep swamp is so deep and so yucky that no one will EVER be able to drain it ...
We all know that proper transparency requires an isolated server that the official can "wipe with a cloth" at will.
It’s been more than 8 years since the existence of Hillary’s secret bathroom email server was divulged in early March, 2015, and in that more-than-8-years, I’m not aware of ANYONE paying any sort of legal price for engaging in unlawful email practices. It’s still only looked on as fodder for “journalists” to gripe about and not a serious problem that SHOULD result in removal from office and prison time. So what we actually have is a secret government operating behind the scenes, with a fake government play-acting for the public.