Texas School District Threatens to Seize 79-Year-Old Man's Home for Stadium Parking Lot
The Houston-area Aldine Independent School District is considering the use of eminent domain to seize a one-acre property owned and occupied by Travis Upchurch.

A family in Houston, Texas, is at risk of having their generational home seized to make way for the expansion of the adjacent high school football stadium's parking lot.
In April, the Aldine Independent School District voted to authorize the use of eminent domain to seize the home and surrounding acre of land currently owned and occupied by 79-year-old Travis Upchurch, reported the Houston Chronicle in July.
The land has been in Upchurch's family since 1916 when his relatives first immigrated to the area from Sweden. At the time they settled there, the area was predominately agricultural, dominated by dairy farms and pecan trees.
Beginning in the 1970s, Aldine ISD started purchasing up the land around the Upchurch property as part of the construction of its current football stadium. Today, it's surrounded on three sides by stadium parking. The vacant lot abutting the fourth side of the property is also owned by the district.
"My dad has pretty much been in a high school football stadium parking lot since then," Travis Upchurch's daughter, Tara Upchurch, tells Reason.
Tara Upchurch says that she had expected Aldine ISD would want to buy the land once her father passed away. Her family's expectation was that until then, he'd be able to stay in their longtime family home.
That expectation was upended in June when Travis Upchurch received a letter in the mail informing him that the school district was intent on purchasing his land as part of a $50 million rebuild of the existing stadium.
"It was pretty shocking," says Tara Upchurch. "It was really hard to process the loss of it."
Aldine ISD said in a statement to the Chronicle that they tried to purchase the Upchurch property voluntarily last year but had their offer rejected. Tara Upchurch and her father both dispute this, saying they were never approached by the district about a voluntary purchase of their property.
After receiving the letter, Tara Upchurch said she contacted several eminent domain attorneys in the area who all told her that her options for fighting the seizure were limited to haggling over compensation.
In response, she and her family have tried to work out an arrangement with the school district that would let her father continue living at the property. Initially, the district seemed receptive to the idea.
After a district board meeting in July at which Tara Upchurch spoke, she says that her family was approached by district staff who suggested they could agree to a life estate. The district would take ownership of the land but Travis Upchurch would be allowed to stay in his home.
Tara Upchurch says her family jumped at the idea: "Yes that's the goal. Keep my dad in his house." But, she says, after that July conversation, they didn't hear anything else from the school district about a life estate.
On Wednesday, the school district sent a final offer letter to Travis Upchurch, who has 14 days to respond.
"These are delicate conversations that balance community needs and individual needs," Aldine ISD said in a statement to Reason. "We have continued to negotiate with the Upchurch family. No eminent domain proceedings have been filed at this time."
In January, the district broke ground on the stadium project. It is scheduled to open in August 2024.
Tara Upchurch says the stress of the potential seizure of his land has caused her father's health to deteriorate. She also argues that there's no reason for the district to seize the land when other vacant properties already owned by the district near the stadium could just as easily be converted to parking.
In the meantime, she says that she'll continue trying to rally public support to convince the district to not go through with the seizure.
"It feels like an unjust use of eminent domain," she says.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you're interested, here's the Google map image of Upchurch's house:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/W.+W.+Thorne+Stadium/@29.9345129,-95.3571837,250m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x8640b65dbd9fbfc7:0xfc00bc9ff7fe0245!8m2!3d29.9336111!4d-95.36!16s%2Fm%2F0l8pz7c?entry=ttu
All you have to do is mention "football" and the vast majority of Texans' eyes glaze over, they start frothing at the mouth and all hint of humanity, sympathy or rationality disappears. Nothing ... NOTHING!! is more important to a Texan than football!
Yes, but, . . . but, . . . a "high school" football stadium?! That's seems bizarre to me. Par for the course, I guess.
What ? Not Pro , not College, but High School football ? Texas is going to boot a (let's admit it, probably republican) old man from his home for High School football ?
Shame. Shame on all of them.
Varsity Blues isn't exactly fiction down there.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
The article answered some of my questions, not all. While using eminent domain under these circumstances may be legal, it sure shows a political tin ear in booting a 79 year old man out of his family home for parking. It also gives a clear example of where "legal" isn't necessarily "right".
Legalities aside, what's the price they're offering? Is it reasonable? Is it satisfactory? Is it generous? Satisfactory pricing would allow him to purchase a similar acre within a 10 mile or so radius at a voluntary sale price. If he can't, then the price they're offering is taking advantage of the old man using the lever of eminent domain.
And one last consideration the decision makers here should consider. The older a fellow is, the less constraint the threat of criminal justice adjudication imposes on him. Try to phõck him on the price, he just might respond by exercising a right of 12-gauge private action.
I suppose with our current justus system being after President Trump for giving a speech, it is necessary to declare that by this post I am not "advocating" that he go a meeting and "clean out the nest", just noting the possibility that he might do that, if suitably provoked, sort of like predicting the weather.
A last note, this regarding jury nullification: if you are ever called to sit on a criminal jury one is not honor bound when dealing with or trapped within a system that is totally lacking in honor or honesty (and one might note, where process is more important truth and form takes precedence over substance). Don't be led to rendering a verdict that carries a penalty you are not aware of, or that you go home afterwards feeling bad about.
what’s the price they’re offering?
Who cares.
Is it reasonable?
To who?
Is it satisfactory?
To who?
Is it generous?
To who?
To the owner of the property, dumbass. Obviously if they had offered him a huge amount of money he would have sold for the benefit of his children. My MN experiences with eminent domain is they try to get away with offering the county tax value, which is is always low, but much more so on agricultural land owned since 1916.
Pay attention to the thread, genius. That's my fucking point.
The Unicorn had a little spare time on his hands - not enough to thoroughly lope his mule around the corral - but some, and he didn't want to waste this spare time even though he had nothing of import to say. And there you see the result. We'd all have be been better off if he'd just gotten out the baby oil.
Actually, Trump is charged with a lot more than giving a speech. Furthermore, speeches directing your followers to engage in crimes are in fact criminal.
You would quiver and clutch your pearls if someone read the comments on revolution and rebellion by the founding fathers.
Plenty of space for a parking lot in that district owned lot to the north.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
They could also raze the smaller baseball field (easy and cheaper) or reduce the amount of green space surrounding the stadium.
Correct. And Texans who refuse to pay for healthcare for its citizens who can't afford health insurance subsidize huge stadia even at the high school level, not to mention the ones for zillionaire owners of professional teams.
God damn those people who spend their money on things they want.
Fuck off.
i think the point is that Texans want fancy football stadiums more than they want healthcare for their less well off fellow citizens. Some people consider these priorities unethical, indeed, un-Christian.
Yeah…. you really do rave nonsensically making a lot of factless claims. Don’t you?
Healthcare is administered by Healthcare.gov, how is Texas circumventing federal healthcare?
Texas should just send their indigent to a sanctuary locale, maybe NYC, where they will receive room, board, and medical care.
It’s for an entire district.
That stadium is probably sold out twice a week, every week.
How much did they offer him?
Twice a week, every week, 3 months out of the year?
No away games?
They charge for high school football tickets in Texas?
Not enough.
"One new appointment .. and it's a BIG one!"
https://www.aldineisd.org/2023/03/01/former-macarthur-star-qb-odell-james-returning-to-aldine-as-head-coach-at-eisenhower/
I wonder how many teachers or tech labs the new head football coach's salary will displace?
Big chunk of vacant land north of the Upchurch property. Wonder why the school district isn't trying to buy that.
They already own it.
Then they could build their god damned parking lot there.
Texas hates teachers! So do a lot of commenters here.
Maybe if they didn't act, like Unions, as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic party they wouldn't catch so much flack from the Right.
"Maybe if they [teacher] didn’t act, like Unions, as..."
But you repeat yourself.
Teachers ARE unions.
If they did their job remotely competently and did not try and hide info from parents, they'd have more respect.
Taxpayer subsidies to build football stadiums sounds quite Democrat to me!
"The purpose of public education is so that every town can have a football team!" --Sam Houston
🙂
No, we hate Marxists, like you. It just so happens that a disturbing percentage of teachers are Marxist, or Marxist adjacent. The teacher’s unions are also largely evil entities. No one here has an existential issue with teachers.
If you weren’t such a leftist drone you could understand the difference.
I would strongly disagreed. Teachers unions bigwigs? Sure, but not the teachers themselves. Until a supreme court ruling a very few years ago, most teachers were forced to join the union. Today, most still are.
It's like the UAW. Diehard Democrat leadership, thoroughly Republican membership.
When you have the opportunity to get an Odell James, you spend whatever it takes.
Too many. Why would a university want more educators instead of jocks?
All government agencies should have to engage in the market like any other participant, that is, without eminent domain.
https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Aldine ISD said in a statement to the Chronicle that they tried to purchase the Upchurch property voluntarily last year but had their offer rejected.
Unable to complete the voluntary transaction, the district decided to transact at gunpoint.
We need eminent doman for things like roads, railroads, pipelines, electric transmission lines, and the like.
But it has been used for football stadia and worse.
The problem is that voters want stadia. Especially in Texas. It is popular to bash California and New York but Texas has a huge number of sins as well.
If someone wants land and the owners won't sell sell, all they have to do is make a case to City Hall that their plans will bring in more tax revenue. The government can then force the owner to sell at a ridiculously low price (steal it basically), and then sell to the developer. The Supreme Court said it's ok.
TX does not have mass looting mobs, nor junkies dropping deuces in the street nor homeless accosting and assaulting random people.
They deserve it.
Likely one gone wrong person with too much power is behind this, and currently everyone is saying who the fuck did we vote for? We didn’t know he was an unhinged football coach that also ran the Council.
It's about as voluntary as the "It'd be a shame if this place burned down" trope for mob shakedowns.
Why does it matter that the homeowner is 79? It would still be a travesty if he were 29. Probably more so, because he would lose more years of enjoyment of his home.
True, but the family is willing to sell it when Travis passes away. They thought they had an understanding that the District would buy the property but guarantee not to turn the old guy out of his home. Apparently the ISD reneged on that arrangement for no apparent reason but that they wanted to put up that parking lot NOW!!
I bet that old bastard is a republican.
And you are a young bastard that deserves to use the government to take land away from families? We’ll wait for your arguments as to the moral rectitude of your comment.
Once again, an eminent domain story with zero numbers for either the value of the property or what the state might offer (contrary to Reason, the state still has to pay you for what they take).
In this case that doesn't matter to me. This is an abuse of E.D. Get a clue.
The money is, obviously, not the issue here. Turning out an old guy from his home against his wishes is mean any way you look at it, and using the power of government is doubly nasty. Old people are usually not as adaptive as younger people. Older people have been known to become disoriented when moved from their usual surroundings, causing them to deteriorate rapidly and sometimes die shortly afterwards.
Fifth Amendment:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Money has, in fact, always been the sticking point of takings. Shall we put you down for amending the constitution here?
No need for me to amend the Constitution. Our government at all levels has been amending it almost continuously since shortly after it was ratified - and not in favor of "the People" either! The Aldine freaking Independent School District may have the authority to kick an old man out of his home, but they shouldn't do it. Not for a freaking parking lot. Not for high school football Friday night parking. Also, I reject your apparent legal interpretation of the Constitution: the wording you bolded says that IF the government takes private property the compensation should be just. It says nothing whatever about when or whether private property should be taken for public use.
So true!
It says nothing whatever about when or whether private property should be taken for public use.
That's what "due process" means. You may not agree that due process has been carried out exactly here and I don't entirely disagree. However, specific to the case here, you're acting like the government can't, under any circumstances, not even purchase land, but even negotiate for property. Which, I don't know that private-ownership "special favor" public use agreements are any better.
I'm not acting like the government can't under any circumstances do any of that. I clearly stated that they have the authority. If the Army desperately needs a fort near a critical defense point during a war, for example, then there might be justification for taking property for that purpose. If Atlantic City wants to take an old lady's home for a casino parking lot for tourism purposes, for another example, then I categorically deny that they have justification. More parking for a high school football stadium clearly falls into that second category.
Yeah. On the one hand, you want to take my land after I'm dead? On the other hand, you want to pay me to tailgate every weekend until I die?
"After receiving the letter, Tara Upchurch said she contacted several eminent domain attorneys in the area who all told her that her options for fighting the seizure were limited to haggling over compensation."
What about suicide bomber?
So... they want to pave paradise and put up a parking lot?
🙂
Not a single documented claim - not the offer tobuy; not the "life estate". Every statement is "ISD said" countered by "Tara Upchurch said". Just words, no proof.
Teen Reason doesn't actually do things like investigation or journalism.
They read something in Vox or the Washington Post that they think would piss people off, then reprint it with anything counter to their narrative omitted and nothing actually useful added.
Half the stories here could just be a link to the original article, with nothing else. The extra words on this site don't actually add much.
What difference does it make if they offered three times the fair market value? The question is if building a school parking lot is an appropriate use of ED takeover?
BTW 3x the FMV should be the standard for any ED action. The government is forcing you to sell at gunpoint, so why not make a windfall?
Arguably to prevent the government from taking land for the purpose of giving someone a windfall. We need a new police station; let's take... the Mayor's land for it, and give him 3x what it's worth!
Right!
And "ISD said", "We haven't filed any Eminent Domain proceedings."
This feels an awful lot like somebody trying to get out in front of the ISD and extort them for more than FMV. Which, I'm not opposed to them doing, but IDK that Reason aiding in the extortion of the other citizens of the Aldine School District counts as libertarian.
$50 million to renovate a public high school football field. Only in Texas.
When I was a School Board Trustee for a different Texas ISD, I was the lone "no" vote against a multimillion dollar stadium renovation - the stadium was in perfectly working condition at the time! - shortly after the district's Olympic sized swimming pool had been shut down because it was going to cost too much to repair and maintain it. At the same budget vote several academic programs were discontinued and defunded. I no longer reside in Texas and have no desire to ever go back.
Qui bono?
Sounds pretty Rev. Kirkland to me.
So, if the school district Eminent Domained a swimming pool or HS auditorium into existence you'd be good with it?
Ridiculous they cannot wait until the older guy passes away. It looks like they have plenty of land to build more parking spaces if needed. Power really destroys some people's ability to understand right from wrong.
Eh. If they need the parking now, waiting until the guy dies isn't a real solution. That could happen in 22 days or 22 years.
Define "need?" Or they could add the parking spaces a block or two further away from the stadium and the porkers can walk their asses to the game once a week from there. They almost certainly could use the exercise!
Even if he was deceased the school district is wrong for using eminent domain to seize family property.
This is one example of the reason schools went from each being managed by their own school board to a district level consolidation. Big construction plans require a bond issuance, Which in turn requires a broader tax base to guarantee the principal repayment. Back in the day when consolidation happened (mostly post-WW2 to the early 60’s), the big construction plans was suburban sprawl and new-build schools for boomer kids.
Nothing wrong with that when those big projects are managed as if they are one-time projects that have to generate their own return and principal repayment at the end. But that’s not what happens. Instead, those big bond issuances get managed as if the principal will never get repaid but will get rolled over instead. That debt will simply become perpetual additional overhead(sometimes get confused with 'inflation'). And when it comes time to pay off a debt tranche, the new centralized entity simply finds/creates big new projects with no meaningful return so that it merely rationalizing rolling over that debt tranche. eg a football stadium parking lot in what becomes a brownfield infill development that now requires eminent domain.
This isn’t unique to school districts or government. It occurs with companies who use debt to finance M&A. With homeowners who never pay off their mortgage but instead keep refi’ing and cashing out and make political decisions to keep house prices rising. It’s probably why the US economy has become so financialized. This story is just an example of the outcome.
"Nothing wrong with that when those big projects are managed as if they are one-time projects that have to generate their own return and principal repayment at the end."
That assertion NEVER applies to government agencies. School districts and other government agencies NEVER generate their own return or principle repayment. At least in Texas, school districts are forbidden by law from maintaining sinking funds for new construction or replacement projects because they would then be collecting taxes for the specific purpose of holding it (at interest) until the money is needed for the long-term projects planned. Since most of us would agree in principle that it's better for the taxpayers to hold and have the use of their own money until the government needs it for the approved project, the system results in FUTURE taxpayers funding the repayment and interest costs after the project instead of CURRENT taxpayers. My conclusion is that all tax-funded education enterprises in America should be privatized immediately. Of course, I'm NOT going to be holding my breath!
What you’re saying is that in Texas it is ILLEGAL for any level of government to actually pay its debt. That’s not a surprise because in practice no one in America pays off debt except chumps. It’ not just a government thang. We just keep rolling principal over (or refi’ing and taking cash out), jacking price levels ever higher with increasing financialization of overhead costs, come up with new projects that deliver lower returns, wait for the next crisis, bail out various forms of debt, and then centralize decisions around the ‘too big to fail’.
My conclusion is that all tax-funded education enterprises in America should be privatized immediately.
The math is the same for everyone. And in fact private borrowing costs are higher than government borrowing costs precisely because of the taxing power to pay those bonds which reduces risk.
The Aldine ISD has roughly $1 billion in GO bonds. If they decided to privatize all education, they would:
a)have to pay exactly the same taxes as now to fund the operations of now-private schools
b)still have to pay the $40 million or so each year – from taxes to creditors – to carry the cost of the current debt
c)have to PAY the bonds when due since rollover would no longer be an option
d)be forced into Ch9 bankruptcy where creditors would force an increase in taxes to pay that $1 billion
Financially, you’re offering a bad deal. Which is precisely why many advocate it. If it improves school outcomes, then the governing focus should be on replicating those outcomes in a context without the crappy finances. eg – privatize classrooms/teachers/curriculum. Or decentralize those to each school board.
Throwing good money after bad, then? Government has already taxed us so deeply into debt that we can't afford to put an end to their taxing us even MORE deeply into debt? Government education will NEVER be able to provide a better education - even on average - than a totally private system. And nothing I said implied that any taxpayer should fund anyone's education through taxes. There is no particular reason that the school districts could not continue taxing to pay off past debts after we stop them from continuing to be responsible for providing education to anyone. In fact, I suggest that would be a VERY good "deal" for both taxpayers in general and for people who want a good education.
Throwing good money after bad, then?
Not at all. Just not giving up on the idea of self-governance. Your fatalism about that leads nowhere except to accepting rollup bailouts, then finally a nice big default at the federal level, leaving us with a centralized totalitarian dictatorship.
When something as simple as individual school management pretty much eliminates the notion of any $50 million stadium funding and all that flows from that.
And nothing I said implied that any taxpayer should fund anyone’s education through taxes.
Aah. The propertarian view of humanity. Children's station in life flows from their parents. If children are lucky enough to be born to richer parents, then they have the opportunity to prepare themselves for an even better life. If not, they head into the fields to pick cotton. If we want to provide opportunity to those latter kids, then what we should really do is allow the sale of children to richer/better parents. We are born property of others and slaves to them.
It's where paleo leads if they are honest enough to follow that thinking to its conclusion - eg Javier Milei the president candidate in Argentina. And not just Argentina.
The first real-world example of 'privatized schooling' and its aftermath in the US happened in the aftermath of Brown v Board with the Southern Manifesto, Stanley Plan, Brown II, segregation academies, Brown III, Freedom of Choice plans, busing/zoning, etc. The reaction to eliminate 'public' education. Rather than to eliminate district-based schools which were de facto required in Jim Crow - 'separate but equal' requires all schools in an area to be managed under the same management.
The only thing "paleo" here is your clinging desperately to a failed increasingly centralized authority. Government has done nothing whatever to end the "luck" of being born into a wealthy position in life. Luck has almost nothing whatever to do with the opportunities people create for themselves. In the real world society is highly mobile both upwards and downwards everywhere that government stays out of it.
30 years of paying on mortgages and still no equity. That's the banks' plan.
It's Texas. Football stadiums are more sacred than human lives.
I earned $5000 ultimate month by operating online only for 5 to 8 hours on my computer and this was so smooth that I personally couldn't accept it as true before working on this website. If you too need to earn this sort of huge cash then come and be part of us. do this internet website online...
https://www.dailypay7.com/
The house has been surrounded by parking lots for how long? I would have done one of two things - the school district clearly destroyed the quality of life by ruining the immediate neighborhood, so I would have either sued them for such, or quietly offered to sell them the property years ago... which one I would have done would have depended on my mood of the day. Suing a government entity would have been an uphill battle, but enlisting an organization such as IJ would have been great for generating PR. Or, I would have quietly negotiated a top-dollar sale and bailed out.
How in the hell does a school district have eminent domain powers?
Most of these cases would never make the news if people in such situations were offered a truly just settlement. A new replacement home of better value than the one given up and equal or greater land in an equally desirable location; all relocation costs covered; and a sizeable amount for the inconvenience.
When you get to the details, you usually find out that "emminent domain" is just pretty words for theft.
Trudat!
if you are looking for the immigration lawyers in poland than no doubt for this dm immigration is the best and is one of the best immigration company in dubai that operates all over the world and has a 100% success ratio over 10 years of wide immigration experience and 10,000 visa approvals visit for more details
https://dm-poland.pl/
Based on aerial photos, it looks like we're talking about roughly 161 additional parking spaces on the upper end (about 23 spaces high by about 7 rows of parking).
The constitution says "just compensation" , not market value. To me, just compensation would be fair market value plus a few hundred dollars per hour of time spent shopping for a replacement residence plus moving costs and reimbursement for any capital gains taxes incurred. "Moving costs" would of course mean a white glove, hands free move of all personal property including packing, unpacking, repair or replacement of any goods damaged or lost during the move.
Eminent domain, by a school district, for a high school stadium parking lot. Fucking what? We're gonna need a bigger wood chipper.
Just start the building phase and run jack hammers and make all the noise in the world next to his lot for three days....Couldn't they make him Captain of the Football team ? Do the coin toss at every home game? Zillow has the 932 sq. foot home listed at $235,000 (190 to 280 range). If they are spending $50 million they probably made a decent offer and the owners (heirs) are being the greedy ones. I do hope they somehow lose in Court if it comes to that - this is not a public use.
Fuck you, Reason.
What was written:
school district threatens
What, by your own telling, actually happened:
In April, the Aldine Independent School District voted to authorize the use of eminent domain to seize the home and surrounding acre of land currently owned and occupied by 79-year-old Travis Upchurch, reported the Houston Chronicle in July.
…
Aldine ISD said in a statement to Reason. “We have continued to negotiate with the Upchurch family. No eminent domain proceedings have been filed at this time.”
No wonder all your other “request for interviews” go unanswered, because you’re dishonest, well-poisoning assholes. Reading this, any other person of any business would rightly instruct their employees to tell you “No comment.” or “Go fuck yourselves.”
Seems like saying a threat was made when, in fact, the closest thing presented is a vague implication of a threat, even with a known commitment to good faith negotiations, should be the *exact* sort of thing covered by defamation lawsuits.
Enough is enough. The people should be demanding allodial titles to their land.
This way, the landowner can no longer be extorted and forced to rent what is supposed to be their property, from the state.
The other benefit is public schooling will go the way of the dinosaurs. No longer will parents be forced to pay for schools that are trying to abuse children and force an ideology upon them, that was started by child predators money (from Harvard) and kinsey.
I get paid over $220 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I would be able to do it but my best friend earns over $35k a month doing this and she convinced me to try.For Details
.
.
For Details►————————————————————➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com