74 Percent of College Students Support Snitching on Professors Who Make 'Offensive' Statements
Blame university administrators.

According to a new survey, a majority of college students believe that professors who say something "offensive" should be reported to the university.
The survey, from researchers at North Dakota State University, found that 74 percent of students overall supported reporting professors for offensive statements. While a majority of students from all political persuasions agreed with reporting professors, a higher percentage of liberal students were in favor; 81 percent of liberal students supported reporting professors, while only 53 percent of conservative students supported it.

The survey also found that 58 percent of students, including 66 percent of liberal students and 37 percent of conservative students, agreed that fellow students who make "offensive" statements should be reported to university administrators.
Researchers also presented students with a series of example statements and asked whether a professor should be reported for expressing these opinions in class. Students were much more likely to support reporting professors over typically "conservative" opinions. For example, 40 percent of all students (including 51 percent of liberal students and 15 percent of conservative students) agreed with reporting a professor for saying, "If you look at the data, there is no evidence of anti-black bias in police shootings." If a professor said that COVID-19 vaccine mandates are "an assault on individual freedom," 34 percent overall would favor reporting him. Thirty percent supported reporting a professor who spoke in favor of eliminating affirmative action.
But less than 15 percent of all students supported reporting professors for stating that not getting vaccinated for COVID-19 is "irresponsible," that those who oppose affirmative action are "perpetuating white privilege," or that a "civilized society doesn't need guns."

Overall, researchers found that two-thirds of surveyed students agreed that a professor should be reported for making one of the 10 example statements provided, including 75 percent of liberal students and 41 percent of conservative students.
These results indicate that a significant majority of college student support snitching on their professors—and peers—to university administrators for fairly mundane opinions on contemporary political subjects.
"What I found alarming was students' willingness to report professors for stating opinions or facts. This year's survey clarified that they aren't talking about hate speech or harassment." John Bitzan, the survey's author, told The Hill. "An astounding 65 percent are in favor of reporting professors for stating opinions or facts about affirmative action, police shootings, vaccines, guns, and gender."
The survey provides further support for concerns that American college students are increasingly unwilling to tolerate political opinions they disagree with. Most troubling, it seems that the bounds of what is deemed "offensive" has continued to expand. Not only do students now bristle at tolerating truly hateful speech, but they also seem unable to stand even basic observations on popular political issues.
An easy way to fix this problem would be for universities to stop making it so easy to tattle to administrators over minor political disagreements—and stop setting students up with the expectation that any offense deserves administrative involvement.
However, that would require scaling back the huge bureaucracies that have exploded at many colleges for the express purpose of refereeing student and faculty speech—something most universities are unwilling to do.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yeah, seems like the bigger problem is that there is anyone to snitch to. You were offended? So what? That should be all that happens.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Exactly. Some concerns need to be in validated.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
To me, those are the professors who probably deserve a raise. 😉
I'd probably report the "sex is not binary" one to the dean of the college if it was a biology class. 😉
I would support college administrators hiring truncheon wielding Pinkertons to beat the living shit out of 74% of college students.
Poor little snowflakes.
We have become a nation of perpetual infants. God help these snowflakes when we become communist. They will be sent to interment camp and will wonder why nobody is listening to them. We will need another civil war to fight for the freedoms these clueless a-holes gave up. Life is a vicious cycle because of idiots.
Those little snowflakes will be the ones to send others to the gulags.
Ditto
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
I won't snitch on you for spamming, but fuck no!
74 Percent of College Students Are Thin-skinned Whiny Bitches
Basically.
One would think that getting a thicker skin is part of what you learn at university, or at least, should learn.
Didn't Jordan Peterson have a quote in that Cathy Newman interview that was something along the lines of 'If you want to get at the Truth, you have to risk being offensive.'?
Something like that. Offence is also pretty much entirely subjective. Anyone can potentially take offense at anything. No one can ever say what they mean if they are constantly worrying about the possibility of offending someone.
I disagree. Politeness is the grease that eases an otherwise difficult society consisting of many minor irritations - and some major ones - arising out of our differences. Although it's true that some people can take offense at minor or even non-existent provocations, it's also true that some people go out of their way to provoke others. The most common scenario in my experience is one person doing or saying something relatively minor, the other person blowing it out of proportion and escalating the situation and when you aggregate enough of those countless irritations to national levels it results in culture war. All it takes is one person to decide that it was unintentional and the other to decide it wasn't that important to defuse these situations - but people have to stop being so irritable.
I'm fine with politeness being "social grease" (I think that was a Heinlein quote, or at least paraphrase), but the issue is that these kids are getting off on being offended; they are looking for a reason to be offended.
Also, I recall some comment many years back that "anything that is perceived as harassment IS harassment", meaning that the intention of the commenter is irrelevant. Again, with a generation who is constantly looking for a reason to be offended, harassment (offense) is easy to find.
The problem is that none of these folks have ever heard, or taken to heart, the saying "Men of good will can disagree", and those who know the Voltaire quote ("I may not agree with what you are saying, but will defend to the death your right to say it") take great pride in shouting it down.
The issue is, there is no good will in these people; they are spoiled children looking to pick a fight.
Spoiled, attention seeking little narcissists. They’ve never been told “no” at any time in their lives. Dr. Jordan B. Peterson is right.
I remember watching that interview with that abominably ignorant biatch. She attempted to spin everything Dr. Peterson said into something it wasn't. Then he had to correct her. It went on the entire interview.
The BBC needs to go the way of the Dodo.
I agree, but with the understanding that all of us were insecure, inexperienced idealists when we were young. Heinlein also pointed out that young people needed disciplinary structure from adult society in order to become tolerant self-disciplined adults eventually. These kids are not getting that from either their parents or their society, so many of them will never achieve adult levels of self-discipline, tolerance, politeness or responsibility. Many of them will have to learn from the school of hard knocks and life experience that victimhood and outrage don't get them a place to live, a satisfying career or a good marriage. Unfortunately, government and universities will subvert this process by rewarding children with graduate degrees in art history and underwater basketweaving and positions in academia.
They’re victim bullies. And it’s probably their first taste of power isn’t heir entire lives.
Yes. The exact quote was "In order to think, you have to risk being offensive."
Given the size of a university "class," which can go anywhere from a dozen to several hundred, is it even possible to say anything of substance without offending somebody?
“Something of substance “ is the part they want to eliminate.
Yeah. But sometimes it's not even about the "substance" Today folks seem to be arguing about how to teach basic math skills. That's not new, either, they were arguing about it in the 1960's, as well.
Looks like Reason contributor Christian Britschgi is moonlighting and actually doing real journalism.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2023/06/28/laid_low_by_the_covid_vaccine_theyre_also_not_immune_to_a_bad_case_of_federal_unpreparedness_943284.html
"With her medical bills mounting and her condition not improving, Fox sought compensation for her damaged health. Federal liability protections prevent the vaccine-injured from directly suing vaccine manufacturers like Johnson & Johnson. Instead, claimants have to go to the federal government for compensation.
But as Fox would soon learn, the government has two starkly different injury programs for vaccines. One operates like a civil court with a neutral judge, lawyers on both sides, and a guaranteed right of appeal. In recent decades, it has approved about 75% of claims and pays out hundreds of millions of dollars per year.
The other, which handles COVID-19 vaccines, has rejected almost every claim brought to it, awarding less than $10,000 since the pandemic. And in a nation nearly numb to the pandemic's toll and its scandals, the program is adding seething frustration atop lasting injury to Fox and people like her in a little reported aftermath to the government’s much criticized performance on vaccines – ranging from erratic booster advice to broad-brush vaccine mandates that cost people their jobs."
Hmm. Less than 10 grand paid for Covid 19 vaccine injuries. The individual featured in Christian's article got a J&J "vaccine" and experienced debilitating nerve damage which I found personally interesting. I got the J&J in March 2020 only because I had a trip booked to Mexico in June. And at the time it was still being sold as a traditional sterilizing vaccine. In July I suffered an inflamed nerve in my neck and back that put me flat on my back. I was on disability until December. I've mostly recovered but it left me with a palsy that I expect to have for the rest of my life. I can't prove that my problems are related to the vaccine but It's seems like the most obvious explanation as more facts come out. Meanwhile my brother who was all in on the Pfizer and boosters got an extremely rare leukemia and was dead 3 weeks later. Again I can't prove the "vaccine" had anything to do with it but it seems like a reasonable theory. Statistically we are witnesses large increases in excess mortality and disability. And our government continues to be in complete denial. Anyway good work by Christian well worth the read.
Relevant.
CDC Altered Minnesota Death Certificates that List a Covid Vaccine as a Cause of Death
https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-altered-death-certificates/
Nope! The blame lies completely with university administrators. If administrations collected complaints, investigated the few most serious allegations, and politely responded with: “We considered your complaint and found no violation of the university’s rules or code of conduct. Thanks for your input. Have a nice day,” there would be little incentive for students to snitch. Organizations everywhere have, for some mysterious reason, abandoned any semblance of logic or principle in favor of some misguided, counterproductive, emotional, holier-than-thou keeping-up-appearances strategy. The fact that by following this modus operandi they end up looking bad either way does not seem to have sunk in to them yet.
I'd argue for going further and saying "We considered your complaint and found no violations. Here's our bill for the time you made us waste."
Nah. Make 'em write a reflective essay. That's much harsher.
That would be cruel and unusual punishment under the Bill of Rights! 🙂
I'd prefer a response along the lines of "Go fuck yourself, you snotty little tattletale red guard wannabe."
-jcr
Nope! The blame lies completely with university administrators. If administration collected complaints, investigated the few most serious allegations, and politely responded with: “We considered your complaint and found no violation of the university’s rules or code of conduct. Thanks for your input. Have a nice day,” there would be little incentive for students to snitch. Organizations everywhere have, for some mysterious reason, abandoned any semblance of logic or principle in favor of some misguided, counterproductive, emotional, holier-than-thou keeping-up-appearances strategy. The fact that by following this modus operandi they end up looking bad either way does not seem to have sunk in to them yet.
Worth saying twice. 😉
I don't see why you would have a problem with this in principle. If a professor behaves in a way that violates the code of conduct of the university, of course, that should be reported. That is true even if I disapprove of the actual code of conduct.
The way to deal with bad laws and regulations is not to fail to enforce them, it is to enforce them until people realize that they are bad and change them.
I highly doubt the students answering the survey were interpreting it as an abstract question about obeying and enforcing policies they disagreed with.
If a survey asks whether women who have an abortion at 16 weeks should be arrested, or whether someone who has a 15-round magazine should be reported to BATF, most of us don't go look up the laws and then give whatever answer is consistent with enforcing it. We interpret it as a normative question about the behavior itself.
I do too. So what?
And if the students' normative answers agree with the university, the university will take their complaints seriously. If not, the university will laugh at them.
Either way, this is an issue for the university to decide; there is nothing wrong with students complaining about a professor's behavior, no matter what motivates their complaints.
It is almost like you didn't read the actual article. The statements they would complain about are not complaint worthy. They are wasting university time and resources.
And that is something for the university administration to deal with. It's not a libertarian issue.
You know, just like it's not your concern how Joe runs his gas station or how Jack maintains his lawn.
Also: "bad laws and regulations .
The form this takes usually isn't "Prof. X, student Y has accused you of violating Section 4.1.7a of the faculty code of conduct." It occasionally does happen that way, and then one can make one's impassioned case that Section 4.1.7a is inconsistent with freedom of speech or whatever.
In real life, it's more like "Prof. X, we've received 34 complaints about you this year, and you got a 2.4 average on your student evaluations. The average faculty gets 2.7 complaints and gets a 3.9 on their evaluations. Part of your job is to make students trust and respect you. Read the anonymous student comments and tell us how you plan to improve your numbers enough to not be terminated."
And if a university wants to operate that way, that's their business.
We expect certain codes of conduct pertaining to college professors, such as "you don't become involved with one or more of your students" or certain personal matters or certain political matters. The rest is up for discussion. Certainly when a biology professor says that only women have ovaries, a uterus and fallopian tubes is what makes a women and a man has none of these, therefore cannot claim to be female, should not be cause for a complaint against that professor let alone being placed on administrative leave or being fired from the university. Yet we are seeing just that and it's going to get a lot worse unless we get into action and put a stop to it. Don't send your kids to those colleges and universities and stop supporting politicians who support that rubbish.
Furthermore when you have millions of customers that finally decide they've had enough of this woke nonsense and decide to boycott a product, there's nothing you can do about it. It always has been and always will be the decisions of the customer as to whether or not certain goods or services are best for them.
After all, certain companies and products have been boycotted in the past to the delight of the liberals and now that the shoe is on the other foot, they don't like it.
No, the rest is up to the university administration.
If the university administration wants to implement conformity to a full-on neo-Marxist program and wants students to snitch on professors who aren't fully compliant, that's their business.
Students and parents can vote with their feet.
Federal funding of universities should stop altogether.
I would agree. If you gave an example such as a professor saying "All white people are evil" or "women cannot do math so all of you automatically get a failing grade", then that definitely is worth filing a formal complaint.
It also has to do with context. If you are in criminology analyzing police violence and the professor notes there is no racial discrepancy once factors are properly accounted for, that would be normal. However, if your chemistry professor starts spouting off about politics in the middle of lab, that would be inappropriate.
The concerning thing here is the level of statement that people think is worth reporting. It leads me to think that the statements are significantly more incendiary than is indicated here.
Seems to me administrators and other faculty approve of the snitching to use as a club to discipline professors they don't approve of.
On the one hand, yes, you are absolutely right, it's a tool to get rid of professors they don't like.
On the other hand, I would say based on experience that 90% of the time they (we) don't like a professor it has nothing to do with politics or incorrect opinions. It's that the professor really is an asshole who makes everyone's job harder and drives out the best people who can easily get jobs somewhere less toxic.
Students tend to snitch about assholes. They'll forgive a teacher they actually like.
This is a better story. University professional activists outraged students didn't take a survey about trans rights seriously.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/researchers-horrified-decry-rise-fascism-students-send-mocking-responses-woke-survey
Wow. That was hilarious. And renewed my hope that maybe the world has not gone stark raving mad.
It would be more hilarious except for how unhinged the researchers are.
"The researchers appeared surprised that their own findings had been "ultimately rejected" by many academic journals, leaving them with the impression that their research decrying so-called fascism in academia is viewed by some as "irrelevant to engineering education, if not alarmist.""
"Look, you stupid little shit-grubbers, 'people disagreeing with you' is not 'fascism', full stop."
From the paper itself:
I would suggest that if you can't handle this then you should get a different job.
Wow... I guess when you're publishing a paper to the "Bulletin of Applied Transgender Studies" you don't even have to pretend to be unbiased.
Translation: Since we *all* identify as queer and 4 out of 5 of us are transgendered, we can give ourselves permission to not redact *those* slurs. But we don't have any totally Black people on our team, so we don't have permission to use the N-word.
You say that's notable. Is that notable? Is it, really, in anything but a literal sense?
... I thought this paper (which received funding from a NSF grant, by the way) was supposed to be about a transgender questionnaire? What do fossil fuels, "global racial capitalism", and Palestine have to do with it? Is this just an excuse to get every liberal view you have out there in a single sentence?
"The content of social justice education in STEM must also challenge STEM’s role "...
In China they restrict their kids TikTok so they are actually learning STEM content at an early age instead of the social justice activism that is the cancer devouring our country.
In the US, we are working on replacing actual STEM for college students with social justice activism. Oh what a retarded timeline.
I wouldn't take the time to respond the way those kids did. I'd just hand the paper back and tell the person who asked me to fill it out to fuck right off.
-jcr
Students who can't stand things their professors say should disenroll from those courses - and/or the college, if necessary.
So aside from the first and second questions, the first absurd, the second fairly disputable on both sides, there is no story here.
2/3 of students, even woke ones, DON'T think you should complain about those claims. Thats about normal.
I read that Kamala Harris is lying about Fl curriculum today. Woke lies.
I read this. R/wing lies.
Can you all just stop lying and distorting?
Somehow I don't think that I'd have found much of an audience if I complained to administrators that my professors were talking about communism, the evils of being white, and America being the worst nation on Earth.
Not that I would have complained, but I did - and do - find all of those things offensive.
Prior to the survey, were the students made aware that snitches get stitches?
"The survey provides further support for concerns that American college students are increasingly unwilling to tolerate political opinions they disagree with."
Hell, just read some of the commenters here! They come unhinged if you write something using actual thoughts.
No one is trying to snitch you out to the mods to get you kicked off the boards, you dumb bitch. The only ones who have ever actually cried about the commenters here are rad-lefts and their simps like Laursen.
For fuck's sake, this place was called "Thunderdome" well over a decade ago for the exact reason that people would give each other shit all the time. If you want commenters taint-sniffing each other, Patterico's site would probably be more your speed.
I AM THE 16%
I am 90% sure that 16% is not what you mean.
Hell, just read some of the commenters here! They come unhinged if you write something using actual thoughts.
Someday, when you have an actual thought, please come back and share it. Until then, kindly fuck off, lefty shit.
74 Percent of College Students Support Snitching on Professors Who Make 'Offensive' Statements
Blame university administrators.
Yeah, those full grown adults that went through years of public school were just sitting there, minding their own business, having perfectly normal, center-left, liberty-loving freedom-ey hip-swiveling young-people opinions, when ALL OF A SUDDEN... administrators walked into the room.
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!1!!!1!1!234
Like my fucking God, Jesus Christ, and Buudha for food measure how fucking stupid do people have to be to think that SEVENTY-FOUR FUCKING PERCENT of college kids are authoritarians because of the people THEY HARDLY SEE OR TALK TO while ignoring the massive data set of unhinged leftism among the actual pieces of shit that spend hours a week in a position of epistemic superiority training kids to think like authoritarian.
Never mind the writings and admissions of these professors about a) doing this, b) celebrating increasing their ranks among professorial staff across the nation, c) controlling the Ed departments that allow such nonsense to be filteres down even farther I to K-12 teachers and administrators.
Nope... it is the people who run the school who are the root of the problem. Never mind they are all the products of the very professors we seem unwilling to blame.
Administrators don't come out of the ether fully formed as idiots.
Want To Work From Home Without Selling Anything? No Experience Needed, Weekly Payments... Join Exclusive Group Of People That Cracked The Code Of Financial Freedom! Learn More details Good luck...
Visit this website...https://www.dailypay7.com/
Just remember...some of these students will, at some time become part of the government as they are now. Thought crime is fast becoming a reality. Consider the reaction of the democrats the other day, attempting to censor RFK jr. yes, it was shameful but the dems don't care.
Censorship is the first step to a totalitarian society. These students fail to understand the First Amendment was written to protect the speech of those whom you would find abhorrent.
After that, the Second Amendment was written in case the First Amendment no longer works.
Of course students think this is great. It gives them leverage over the person in charge of their grades for that class.
"Nice career you've got there. Sure would be a shame if something happened to it. Now, about my grades..."
Worry less about being offended and more about professors "teaching" brazen lies or blackmailing students via narrative-dependent grading.
And don't report them to the administration. Surreptitiously record them doing this, and then blast it all over the media/internet.
LOTT these SOBs.
An easy way to deal with this is for any professor who will be talking about any topics that could upset people to tell the students on the very first day that if they cannot handle discussing different opinions and facts they should take a different class instead. Maybe even make them sign something that says they accept and agree. It is crazy to think that this should be necessary, however.
Confucius says: "He who takes offense when no offense is intended is a fool, and he who takes offense when offense is intended is a greater fool."
Someone also said "If one is offended, then they'll never find the truth."
The emotional and intellectual maturity of a toddler. We can't vote our way out of this hell.
What the fuck is "independent/apolitical" that just happens to mirror lefty shit? Dumbass lefty shits think it's cool to say "i'm not political" while marching with a rainbow colored BLM flag?
as $29,000.__ Mike, great work. I applaud your efforts since I currently make more than $36,000 each month from just one easy web company. Even though these are the most fundamental internet operations tasks, you can start making a reliable hf-11 online revenue with as lowOPEN THIS DETAIL>GOOGLE WORK
I get paid between $145 and $395 an hour online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining it I easily made $23,000 with no online skills. Just try it on the companion page..
.
.
BONNE CHANCE————————>>> https://Www.Coins71.Com