Tim Scott Debuts Border Platform Including 'Human Wall' and 'Bye-Bye Ambassador' Tucker Carlson
Though the 2024 Republican candidate's proposals vary in seriousness, they feature plenty of prohibition and brute government force.

On Friday, Republican presidential hopeful Tim Scott participated in a Blaze Media forum hosted by former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, and the U.S.-Mexico border was front and center. Early in the conversation, Carlson mentioned President Joe Biden's recent move to mobilize 3,000 reserve troops for potential deployment to Europe, and he later connected it back to the border.
"Why not build a human wall with, say, the reservists who were called up to go defend Ukraine—why wouldn't they be defending our border?" he asked Scott, who replied, "Totally agree with you."
Carlson questioned why the Pentagon should be funded "if they are refusing to defend" the country. "Aren't you kind of being invaded at a certain point?" he continued. "If you've got millions of military-age men coming into your country and hundreds of thousands of Americans are dying, why is that not the job of the military to stop?"
"I don't disagree with you," said Scott.
The exchange highlights several mounting trends on the right. For one, it repeats "invasion" rhetoric that wrongly paints migrants as national security risks, akin to enemy soldiers. It's also heavy on the misguided belief that closing the border will keep fentanyl out of the country. These points both play into an increasing interest on the right in taking military action along the border and within Mexico—even as Republican lawmakers question the wisdom of military involvement elsewhere in the world.
"I don't know anyone who's been killed by Russia. I know people personally who have been killed by Mexico," said Carlson. That's because the Mexican government, he argued, "is party to the murder of hundreds of thousands of Americans" by "allow[ing] fentanyl to be made in its country and to come over our border." Scott didn't disagree.
It is true, and tragic, that thousands of Americans are dying of fentanyl overdoses. But fentanyl is largely smuggled into the U.S. through legal ports of entry, rather than in remote illegal border crossings, by American citizens. A vanishingly small percentage of arrested illegal border crossers—0.02 percent—were carrying any amount of fentanyl. A common retort is that fentanyl is going undetected because Border Patrol agents are too busy arresting undocumented immigrants. But according to congressional testimony by the Cato Institute's David J. Bier, even though arrests fell by 42 percent in January, Border Patrol didn't seize more fentanyl that month. Moreover, Bier's research found that "the government exacerbated the problem by banning most legal cross border traffic in 2020 and 2021, accelerating a switch to fentanyl (the easiest-to-conceal drug)."
Carlson and Scott didn't explore the main problem fueling fentanyl deaths: the unpredictable composition of black market opioids, which is driven by drug prohibition. As long as there are Americans willing to buy illicit fentanyl, that supply will continue to enter the country—and kill.
Earlier in his remarks, Scott rejected the idea of American boots on the ground in Ukraine. But he thinks they'd be effective at the southern border: "I would use every resource we have, to include the United States military, to stop the flow of fentanyl."
He didn't expand much on what he'd have the military do. But he's previously said that we should "have more of a military presence on…our southern border" and that "we should do…whatever it takes to secure our southern border." It's a seemingly less bellicose approach than the one pushed by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R–S.C.), who wants to authorize the military to "destroy drug labs." But Scott's proposal still risks escalation and contradicts the (reasonable) things he's said about keeping American soldiers out of Ukraine.
Scott would have a similarly heavy hand on immigration, with proposals of varying seriousness including "appoint[ing] Tucker Carlson as my bye-bye ambassador to figure this out" ("this" being broad deportations), finishing the border wall, and doing away with sanctuary cities.
Carlson and Scott touched on a number of genuinely pressing problems. But border security, the immigration system, and fentanyl overdoses won't be solved by more prohibition and more brute government force.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is it brute force if government stops any crimes? Or just when it is your pet issue?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
I earn 200 dollars per hour working from home on an online job. I never thought I could accomplish it, but my best friend makes $10,000 per month doing this profession and that I learn more about it.
.
.
.
Here’s how she did it…………… https://Www.Coins71.Com
I am making really good money (80$ to 100$ / hr. )online from my laptop. I was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $100 however I see the way it works now. sd370 I experience mass freedom now that I’m my non-public boss.
Everybody should start earning money online by
using this website……. https://www.dailypro7.com
I make $100h while I’m traveling the world. Last week I worked by my laptop in Rome, Monti Carlo and finally Paris…This week I’m back in the USA. All I do are easy tasks from this one cool site. check it out,
AND GOOD LUCK.:)
.
.
.
HERE====)>>>>>> http://www.join.salary49.com
Is it brute force if government stops any crimes?
Liberteens at Emote: “Yes!”
I have just received my 3rd paycheck which said that 16285 American Bucks that i have made just in one month by working online over my laptop. This job is amazing and its regular earnings are much better than my regular office job. Join this job now and start making money online easily by
.
.
.
.
just use this link…………………… https://Www.Topearn7.Com
no politician will admit that ‘illegal’ drugs coming into the USA is simply a supply and demand issue.
This is because the for-looters-only 1971 Nixon subsidies block libertarians from campaigning--and certainly from getting hired to many posts.
This is because the for-looters-only 1971 Nixon subsidies block libertarians from campaigning--and certainly from getting hired to many posts. Libertarian candidates are aware of the facts.
So very true. Market principles get a back seat when politician are trying to scare the public.
"But border security, … won't be solved by more prohibition and more brute government force."
Guarding the border somehow doesn’t solve "border security"?
Everyone knows it actually does. Even the dumbest animals know they can secure something by guarding it. Why don’t Reason writers know what even fish and birds know?
The solution to bank robberies isn't stronger vaults and armed guards!
With boobie (hehe boobie) trapped money that when you get back explodes, and kills all your theiving/infiltrating friends too
Of course not, it’s the demand for money!
“Bier's research found that "the government exacerbated the problem by banning most legal cross border traffic in 2020 and 2021, accelerating a switch to fentanyl (the easiest-to-conceal drug)”
I don’t know how big of a myopic idiot you have to be to Not realize this totally undercuts the whole “fentanyl isn’t smuggled across the border” nonsense you just said a few sentences earlier.
Because biologists know that when animals want something and are determined to get it guarding alone will not help. Animals will dig under fences, will dig up nests, will drive or trick other animals away from their nests.
Yet people still lock their up their cars and homes. So try again with your open borders bullshit.
I was responding to a comment about animals guarding things. Follow the thread.
I’ve always been a bit miffed by (my interpretation of) the Reason stance on completely open borders. I suppose it is a viewed as a supply and demand issue for labor. But we don’t live in a libertarian dreamland rather a mixed socialist state. Studies are mixed but the more credible ones I’ve read imply huge costs to US tax payers. It will only get worse as states grant more benefits to those poor migrants.
I am curious to know what make a study more credible? Is it that the fact that it agrees with a preconceived notion?
Scott's proposal is no way to guard the border. See my post below with the ARITHMETIC.
Noam Chomsky made the point about capitalists creating demand for their products. That's true, but not all the demand. The libertarians supporting Joe Biden's oligarch-driven project of importing massive numbers of cheap worker bees, are sincerely driven by thinking the result is a libertarian thing.
But it is not. If you multiply incentives for people to go on the dole, this is not a personal libertarian result.
AND KID YOURSELF NOT: The Biden administration is massively subsidizing the migration of millions of people into the country, aided and abetted by both crony capitalists here and brutal murderous cartels there. The policies are also supporting the rapes of almost all of the women who cross, especially the attractive ones. (Even Robert F Kennedy Jr has pointed this out).
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18k to $21k. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26K in this month by just working online from home in my part time.
Every person easily do this job by just…………..>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
Biden is certainly a proponent of rape. Even of his own daughter.
Note to foreign readers: Religious fanatics appeal to revealed Truth, not facts. This requires the "Argument From Intimidation".
Yes, we know you’re an anti christ bigot.
You wouldn’t know a fact if it bitch slapped you with Comstock’s dick.
When you resort to citing RFK Jr as "proof" of your ramblings, it's cue to the rest of us that you're just as much a loon as he is. You win "mute".
Capitalists don't create demand, they predict it, and provide products to meet it. The wealthiest capitalists (the ones the Far Left derides), are the ones who are the most adept at creating things people want, at prices they are willing to pay, at the least cost in resources and labor, leaving those resources available to meet other of mankind's infinite wants and needs.
After the fentanyl is detected at legal points of entry do they just let it in? Because there is still a shit ton coming in and making it to market. Or is it that most of the seized fentanyl is at ports of entry because that is where enforcement is concentrated and most of what makes it in is undetected and therefore can't be properly accounted for.
Why I say we go Singapore style, if you import fentanal you will be executed. All of those dock workers know what they are bringing in and all of them are blue collar they hate it as much as everyone.
I dunno. Are we really losing anything of actual value in the people who OD on fentanyl?
Well we did lose that great civil rights martyr, George Floyd. Will humanity ever recover.
A common retort is that fentanyl is going undetected because Border Patrol agents are too busy arresting undocumented immigrants. But according to congressional testimony by the Cato Institute's David J. Bier, even though arrests fell by 42 percent in January, Border Patrol didn't seize more fentanyl that month.
I can't decide if Fiona is completely fucking retarded, if is just thinks the readers are.
It's not like the Border Patrol knows who is carrying fentanyl. If they've been ordered to stop arresting illegals, that doesn't mean they can just go zero in on the drug mules. That means they're just going to be interacting with a lot fewer of the people crossing the border.
As that guy from Instapundit likes to say, "embrace the healing power of 'and'."
Bias shows. If one supports drug legalization then one finds the necessarily “evidence”.
Which is easy, since the evidence of prohibition not working goes back a hundred years. It always brings crime, corruption, and more dangerous product, with no recourse to the courts to collect compensation from providers selling tainted product.
Prohibition didn't work with alcohol, it isn't working with drugs, and it isn't working with migrants either.
One of those things is not like the other ones. People aren't a commodity, Jeffy, even if their cheap labour makes nannies and pool boys affordable.
So explain how prohibition on migrants will totally work this time. How will you make illegal immigration even more illegal-er?
Imagine if they actually enforced the border.
In the last three years it's been far harder for an unvaccinated Canadian trucker with a load of lumber to cross into the US than any narcotraficante.
They do actually enforce the border.
How much more enforcing do you want? Specifically, what do you want to see done?
We don't call you lying Jeffy for nothing.
Here you go. An entire website devoted to statistics on enforcement of the American southwest border.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters
So, what more do you want to see done?
Stop the sea lioning, you disingenuous fatfuck.
Like Ukraine, the US should not rest until no foreign nationals are coming in across our borders between the port of entries. If we can afford billions to stop Russians from crossing into Ukraine, we should be able to spend a few billion to stop the flow across the Southern border. The CBP claims barriers installed in certain areas would funnel the illegal traffic into smaller areas they could control. Presently thousands are crossing from over 150 different countries undetected and thousands more are running and escaping when detected. It is the people that make a country and if the flow is not stopped America will become more like the countries south of our border. The people coming here are who built those countries and made them what they are.
here YOU go
Pedo Jeffy will ignore that, or wave it away.
You are likely wasting your time trying to convince people that the reality is different from what they think it is. Stopping people at the border is not just stopping them and turning them around. Many are requesting asylum, something they have a right to do, even if they may not get accepted. Many have nothing left but to get into this country and not stop trying.
That is a good point. Desperate people will do desperate things. But that can be aided by the perception that US admin has opened the door.
But who is creating the perception that the US has an open-door policy. In many cases it is the media looking for a story and politicians who are looking for an agenda. Story of people streaming across the border or politicians saying the US has open borders, may inspire people hearing this to come to the US. More importantly the individuals who may profit from the misery of the desperate may use news stories and politician's words to help them exploit people.
The cartel members can convince the desperate that getting the US is easy because the American politicians say it is easy.
This is because superstitious “drug” prohibition and FATF meddling in production, trade, finance and banking worldwide has wrecked their economies exactly like making light beer a felony wrecked the US economy and fractional reserve banking system. Bert Hoover and Donnie Trump were both mystical-pandering T-totalitarians and coercive meddlers in all trade and production. Hooverviles translates as cracolândias. Compare the search images. See "Prohibition and The Crash"
Tim Scott wants to do what Trump wants to do: declare war on Mexico, that would be a bad thing but withdrawing aid to Ukraine would be a good thing. The US should negotiate with Russia and Ukraine to end the war.
Russia and Ukraine should negotiate to end the war.
How is putting our troops on our side of the border "declaring war on Mexico"?
Declarations of war need not be against governments. We could declare war specifically on the trafficking gangs. Then the government of Mexico would have to decide who's side they're on.
Trump has never advocated war with Mexico any more than Tim Scott has. It is hilarious to see someone react like a jack in the box and pop up with that kind of propaganda. As a member of OPEC Mexico is not a friend of America. They have closer ties to Russia and China than the US.
Stopping the illegal entry into the US is not declaring war on Mexico you retarded POS.
But stopping most illegal entry would certainly require military action, including inside Mexico against the crime cartels.
Trump even canceled an order to bomb an Iranian base because it might kill a lot of civilian workers. So he’s hardly a bloodthirsty warmonger.
Why is Reason indulging the wit and wisdom of a literal ignoramus like Carlson?
Here he is going full frontal Ignoramus et ignorabimus on Twitter last week:
"200 people died because of vaccine disinformation from Bobby Kennedy and people like him?
Hmmm.how do we know that?
Is that really science ?
No, it's not science,
Because we don't know that.
We can't know that,
There is no way to know that."
I love that Carlson makes you demons feel stupid and evil. Shake your fists with impotent rage, Shrike.
Yes, it’s enjoyable to watch the agony he causes leftist shitbags.
Show cause and effect not correlation. If you can't then Carlson's take is correct. Talking about others ignorance when you display yours is pretty fucking ironic.
Pucker Tarleyton relies on Revealed Faith as a source of Truth. Knowledge ain't got nuthin ta dew wit it.
Have your relatives confined you to a facility for dementia patients yet? If not, should I track them down so they do that?
Tucker slid into the embrace of Ignoramus after flunking Theology at Trinity.
Cool story bro. Got any other gems like that?
Rubber baby buggy bumpers.
who is your go-to for 'wit and wisdom' amongst the jouralisming class?
New polling shows by an almost 3:1 ratio that voters support border protection over making immigration easier. Open borders will never become a thing. Until proponents of making immigration easier can achieve that goal they must meet the 66% of the country that wants the border secured. That means if you want some easing on immigration pathways you have to work to secure the border. Whining about border security proposals without offering solutions that address the worries of 2/3 of voters wishes. Otherwise you are doomed to failure. Wish is what reason seems to prefer. Open borders is never going to happen. The best you can hope for is a much more lenient immigration process. But that will not happen until people feel the border security is being taken seriously and illegal crossings have been drastically curtailed. This continuous need to bash any proposal to secure the border, which is anything but currently secured and is causing dangers both for Americans and for those seeking to enter America.
Ending prohibition will not address securing the border, because no matter how lenient you make the system, someone will not make the cut, therefore there will always be impetus to cross the border illegally. For example, criminals, terrorist, foreign agents, foreign military personal etc almost everyone agrees should be screened for and denied entry. People carrying communicable diseases, most would also agree should be severely restricted. The truth is there is no such thing as open borders and no such thing will ever exist, as long as nation stated continue to exist.
Your ability to invite others into your neighborhood ends when the person you invite is a danger to your neighbors, unless you can guarantee that that danger will not escape your property. It is like firing a rifle on your property. It is entirely your right, or should be, but it the projectile leaves your property and causes injury to someone or their property, the fact that it was fired on your property does not protect you from the damage you did to them or their property. So saying you should be able to invite anyone you want into the country, also means that you must also take responsibility for their actions. As I doubt many open borders types would choose to run the risk of being indicted as a co-conspirator to terrorism, espionage or other criminal activities, I doubt they would truly support ending prohibition on those involved in these activities. Ergo, they aren't really arguing for open borders but more lenient immigration process. Which means that someone will be in charge of securing the border to keep our prohibited types, no matter how lenient you make the system. Therefore, to make a more lenient immigration process a reality, the border must be enforceable and must be secured.
The fact is we have tried multiple times (Reagan's amnesty being the most famous) with the lenient model in return for promises of stepped up border enforcement. And every single time, the second part is never enacted, creating the very problem that the 'compromise' was supposed to fix. Is it any wonder people are more supportive of tightening the border than ever before?
Until immigration reformers can be successful, you must address the 1000 pound gorilla in the room, mainly that in the past year illegal immigration has surpassed the population of citizens in a number of states. We have very little to no idea who they are, why they came here and what danger, if any, they might pose. Writing off these worries is an exercise in futility. The only logical conclusion, therefore, is that you don't really want to get your ideas ever, even partially, implemented but instead just want to use them as a wedge issue to feel superior to everyone else. Basically, all the open borders types on here, who scream culture wars, are themselves fully participating in those culture wars, for the same deluded reasons the accuse others of.
New polling shows by an almost 3:1 ratio that voters support border protection over making immigration easier. Open borders will never become a thing. Until proponents of making immigration easier can achieve that goal they must meet the 66% of the country that wants the border secured.
3:1 ratio would imply that 75% of the country wants the border secured.
Not if only 22% wants open borders, with the remaining 13% undecided or not giving an answer.
Ah, the 3:1 was not exclusive. OK. Hadn't considered it being 6:2:1 for the entire cohort. I stand corrected.
Open borders would destroy this country. We are seeing it happen in real time.
What are you, some kind of populist? Giving the people the border security they are asking for is an assault on democracy, and all those-would be immigrants who want to vote here!
Life as a Koch-funded open borders fanatic must be emotionally draining.
You got the President you wanted. And although year 3 of the Biden economy has been fantastic for most of the 20 richest people on the planet, your sugar daddy Charles isn't doing so well. 🙁
What's going on? What's the flaw in Mr. Koch's business model that prevents him from prospering like the Waltons and Brin and Page and Zuckerberg and Buffett and Ballmer and Ellison and Gates and Bezos and Musk?
Especially Musk! Jeeeeeez. That guy is running laps around ol' Chuck. He's up $111B this year. Which is more than Mr. Koch has accumulated in his entire life. And don't forget, Mr. Koch essentially started as a billionaire, inheriting his fortune from his father.
Is it because Musk runs businesses that can operate without importing desperate Ukrainians to work for poverty wages?
Standard socialist "wrong knight on white horse" tearmongering.
The fly leaks orange juice into the great midnite.
For sound economic analysis go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
A hustle. For free entry libertarian economics, no visas, no searches, go to libertrans.blogspot.com
No, m’kay? And you’re not a libertarian. You’re a kook leftist bigot.
even as Republican lawmakers question the wisdom of military involvement elsewhere in the world.
Uh...that's because military involvement elsewhere in the world is ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD, you drooling twit. The border security problem is ON OUR BORDER, the defense of which is the primary responsibility of our national government.
Why do we even like, have a border man?
To make the Liberteens of Emote sad.
For one thing, it's a jurisdictional boundary. On this side of the border you are under the jurisdiction of the United States, and whichever state you happen to be in. It's pretty basic.
The idea that people can only come here if they have Joe Biden's permission (or whoever the current president happens to be) is decidedly NOT a libertarian idea. Check immigrants for up to date vaccinations, check them for criminal records, that's all good. But for the Federal government to deploy a literal line of troops on the border if fucking bullshit.
There's no way we can "check" everyone without greatly improved border security.
Legal immigration is still a pressure relief valve against illegal immigration. If there is a legal route here, people will take it. Instead of spending all that money on a useless wall, how about some legal immigration centers? How about changes to policy like bringing back worker programs?
I recall, not that long ago, when Republicans openly stated they were only against illegal immigration, and NOT legal immigration. That turned out to be a lie. Now they hate all immigrants from the south, legal or otherwise.
That is true, but for another reason. Republicans had to invent bogeymen after the Civil War, so Comstock and the NY Society of Book Burners became the Allies of collectivist, protective-tariff Christianity. Jyooz weren't, and they had no more use for Freedmen either, the high tariff being a done deal. Thanks to China and the Methodist White Terror, all other drugs became Avatars of Satan, and Christianity sent gunmen to the Philippines and Southern Monroe Nations to murder all who disagree. The resulting collapse of those economies drives refugees to where their troubles originated. But God's Own Prohibitionists aren't about to own up to that.
Goddamn, you’re full of shit. You know nothing of republicans.
There is a legal route here. Some 1M take it every year.
“The idea that people can only come here if they have Joe Biden’s permission (or whoever the current president happens to be) is decidedly NOT a libertarian idea.”
I don’t think anyone here is calling for executive order to deal with the border crisis, so if congress actually did it’s job, and the executive did it’s job of executing the law, and the judicial did its job of adjudicating the law, we may not get a libertarian solution (the border, like abortion, doesn’t have just one libertarian solution), but it’s be a damn sight better than the current situation.
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18k to $21k. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26K in this month by just working online from home in my part time.
Every person easily do this job by just…………..>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
GOP 2023: Still digging that hole.
Dems 2023: still turning dicks inside out to make holes.
Yes, both sides are terrible. Glad we agree.
Men don’t come equipped with ‘bonus holes’.
The Kleptocracy factions haven't changed much since 1857. According to "The Devil's Dictionary," Long Dong and Timmy are "African" to God's Own Prohibitionists, whereas to the Dems, Obama and all Black congresscritters except Burgess Owens and Byron Donalds qualify as African. The Republican push to repeal the 13th, 15th and 21st Amendments and bring back Comstockism is as fascinating to psychiatrists (and nuclear physicists) as the surge toward Germany's revival of Christian National Socialism.
Are you aware that you say a lot of stupid shit that is in no way grounded in reality?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars,...OPEN THIS DETAIL>..GOOGLE WORK
My pay at least *****/day.My co-worker says me!I’m really amazed because you really help people to have ideas how to earn money. Thank you for your ideas and I hope that you’ll achieve more and js receive more blessings.OPEN THIS DETAIL>................GOOGLE WORK
Tim Scott disqualified himself from the Presidency when he could not unequivocally state that committing war crimes (sending banned cluster munitions to Ukraine) is bad.
Instead he was all "It wouldn't have happened under my watch" but refused to answer the direct question "It's happening now, do you condemn that decision?"
The political answer to "How do you feel about this (or any) war crime?" should be "It's evil, and I don't support it."
And as he seems to feel sending them to Ukraine is fine and dandy, does he think they're OK to use on our own border? I'm not endorsing this, but the cynic in me has to admit, it'd be a hell of a deterrent, and if one war crime is OK for supposed "US interests," why not a few more?
Oh right, Ukraine is a project for the POLITICAL class, where they can do whatever the hell they want, whereas the border is a CIVILIAN problem, so they'll do nothing, and the pesky proles can just shut up and eat shit and die.
Republicans, and for that matter Democrats, will never solve the border problem because they view it as a nail and so only look to hammer on the problem. The drugs are getting more powerful, in smaller form and so more easily smuggled. People are desperate and so will keep coming. They can die in their country of origin or die trying to get into America.
Address drugs at the demand side by trying to help the users. Make it easier for good people to get into this country and work to help make south and central American countries better place to live so the US is not some peoples last resort.
I'm used to the MSM not giving Libertarian candidates one iota of attention unless they say something stupid (Aleppo) or paint themselves silver, but I'm incredibly frustrated that an ostensibly libertarian publication such as Reason *ALSO* ignores Libertarian candidates and obsesses about candidates from the two legacy parties. If we can't even count on friendly publications to give Libertarians some space, then the party is doomed - and Reason will be partly at fault.
Maybe we should just legalize fentanyl, so it's made safer and cheaper.
No legitimate business in the US is going to sell it, even if it's legal. You'd end up with a regulated legal "market" that no users buy from, and a continuing black market, just as has happened with marijuana "legalization".
Fentanyl is just too unsafe. We were so much better off when people were just taking hydro o dome and the like.
There are plenty of dangerous legals drugs that people use all the time. The difference is legal drugs have a known concentration and quality. Fentanyl is a powerful drug, but the greatest danger in the black market is the users don't know the dosage. Quality control is not a priority for the black market.
Scott still seems more sane than Trump (a low bar), and with more charisma than Pence and Hutchinson combined (or multiplied, for that matter.)
Wow..nothing how Tucker Carlson destroyed Mike "neocon" Pence? Or Nikki "neocon" Haley? JC..what a take down. The usual GOP talkign points, "cut taxes, increase defense spending, Russia and Israel (all hail the new Trotsky Zelinsky), some rah rah about "family" and cutting the "deficit" in 100 years doesn't cut it anymore does it? As much as Reason hates Trump he basically destoryed the neocons in the GOP.
As for our border..Nation States have every right to aggressively protect their border from immigration which could destroy liberty. This whole nonsense about "multiculturalism without assimilation" has never worked in any country. $100B in grift for Zelinsky? Hell for that amount we could have ended all our border issues.
All the candidates are pretty much following Trump’s policies, but have to come up with something to differentiate themself from the rest of the pack. So I would expect some tweaking of policy.
Carlson and Scott didn’t explore the main problem fueling fentanyl deaths: the unpredictable composition of black market opioids, coming uncontrolled and uninspected over the open border.
Earlier in his remarks, Scott rejected the idea of American boots on the ground in Ukraine. But he thinks they’d be effective at the southern border: Protecting Ukraine is not our problem except for uncalled for American intervention in 2014 which should have never happened, supporting a Neo-Nazi overthrow of a democratically elected government, American sovereignty and borders are our problem. and a huge problem.
A vanishingly small percentage of arrested illegal border crossers—0.02 percent—were carrying any amount of fentany: true because the cartels send families across where they are sure to get in trouble and need rescuing taking up resources so they can smuggle illegal drugs at will. They also stockpile and then send across massive amounts of illegals at the same time for the same reason. Just because arrests are down doesn’t indicate smuggling is down.
finishing the border wall, and doing away with sanctuary cities: what a great idea! We should all want and support LEGAL immigration.
Reason staff frequently write in support of LEGAL immigration. That often includes the problems with the current system that causes backlog that result in ILLEGAL immigration as desperate people cannot wait.
Tucker Carlson was a more sincere racist than I thought. He really does seem genuinely motivated by white supremacy at an almost redneck KKK level, which of course differs from cultured Nazi level only by degrees of legitimacy. What a strange creature he is.
Sort of like how racist the Democrat party was for over 100 years after the Civil War. The Democrats are still racist as fuck, it's just now they hate white people.
.My pay at least *****/day.My co-worker says me!I’m really amazed because you really help people to have ideas how to earn money. Thank you for your ideas and I hope that you’ll achieve more and js receive more blessings.OPEN THIS DETAIL>GOOGLE WORK
Why not guard the border with a human wall? ARITHMETIC.
To prevent anyone slipping through, you need troops standing close enough they can stretch their fingers out and touch the troop on each side. That's 1,000 men per mile. But that's just the first shift. Eventually they'll have to sleep. With 12 hour shifts, it's 2,000 troops per mile.
But if you've ever been in the military, you know the troops available for duty on one day are much less than the total roster. They get sick - there will be many more going on sick call if you have them standing out in the sun in the Sonora desert for 12 hours. They go on vacations. They have to practice at the rifle range, and go to many other training sessions - nowadays, including many hours of being propagandized about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. So 2,000 troops per mile becomes 5,000.
There are at least 1,000 miles of border to guard. You need 5 million troops. That's over 10 times as large as the US Army is today. The US Army in WWII, was 11 million including the air force. IIRC, we reached that size by drafting a lot of men that nowadays would be considered unsuitable, such as criminals and the grossly obese. Now, we might have to expand the draft to include women.
But what would it cost to add 5 million troops? Each one needs pay, shelter, food, medical care, and retirement plans.
Did your third grade teacher give you a good grade for this?