They're Here Legally, but Face Self-Deportation When They Turn 21. When Will Congress Act?
Over 200,000 dependent visa holders are still waiting for relief.

Your 21st birthday is supposed to be a happy occasion. But right now, hundreds of thousands of people who grew up in the United States are dreading it. Unless Congress acts, the lives they've built here will remain in jeopardy.
The U.S. is home to over 200,000 "Documented Dreamers," dependent visa holders who were brought to the country legally as children by parents on nonimmigrant visas. Though they're here lawfully, those dependents need to secure a work visa or sponsorship for a green card before turning 21. If they can't, they're forced to self-deport.
"Dreamers," undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children by their undocumented parents, are shielded from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals—or DACA—program. But Documented Dreamers don't enjoy the same protections.
"The reason a lot of people are in that situation is because legal pathways don't actually exist," says Dip Patel, founder of Improve the Dream, a group that advocates for Documented Dreamers. "Most people have this misconception where an immigrant can come here, apply, and get in line. That doesn't exist for the vast majority of people."
These dependents' parents are in the U.S. on various nonimmigrant visas, including the H-1B visa for skilled workers in "specialty occupations." When parents apply for green cards, their applications may get backlogged. Documented Dreamers are predominantly from India and China. As a result of per-country caps that limit how many green cards a given country's nationals can receive in a year, their parents often face waits of years or even decades. Kids age out of their dependent status if their parents don't secure permanent residency before they turn 21. From there, the kids can try their luck at a student visa or other temporary status, self-deport, or become undocumented.
Last year, Reason spoke with Fedora Castelino and Laurens van Beek, two Documented Dreamers. Castelino, then 18, described how difficult it was "to realize that I've lived here basically my entire life," yet "this is actually not my home." Her immigration status has limited her opportunities. Without work authorization, she said, she couldn't take on a job to earn extra cash for her family. She didn't qualify for in-state tuition since she was technically an out-of-state international student. Van Beek had to self-deport to Belgium after college and postgraduate extensions, leaving his family and American life behind. It was his first international flight since arriving in the U.S. at age 7.
A proposal currently under consideration in the House and Senate would address many issues faced by Documented Dreamers, and it has rare support—Patel notes that it's the most bipartisan immigration bill in Congress right now, boasting 14 Republican and 14 Democratic House co-sponsors. In the Senate, its sponsors include Sens. Rand Paul (R–Ky.), Alex Padilla (D–Calif.), and Kyrsten Sinema (I–Ariz.).
The America's CHILDREN Act would allow individuals brought to the U.S. as dependents of employment visa holders to receive permanent residency if they've been present here for 10 years (eight of which were under the age of 21) and graduated from an American university. "I think it creates something that most Americans assume is already a reality," says Patel. "That would give true certainty for everyone that's impacted by this issue of growing up here as a child of a long-term visa holder."
Another provision in the bill would establish age-out protections for dependents. Instead of those individuals aging out of their dependent status at 21, their age for adjustment purposes would be locked in as of the day their parents filed for green cards. "That ensures that since they came here as a family unit, they're allowed to stay and their application is still valid and they don't lose their place in line," explains Patel.
Reps. Deborah Ross (D–N.C.) and Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R–Iowa) introduced a related amendment to the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). It's narrower than the America's CHILDREN Act, containing no permanent residency provision. A modified version of the America's CHILDREN Act passed the House NDAA last year, but it didn't make it into the version adopted by both chambers.
Protecting Documented Dreamers from deportation is economically important. In a letter to Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas last June, officials from Amazon, Google, and Uber pushed for "more robust aging out policies," noting that current policies make it harder to attract foreign talent. That's true of the parents, but it's critical to retain the kids, too: An Improve the Dream survey found that over 99 percent of Documented Dreamer respondents pursue higher education, with 87 percent in STEM and health care fields.
But the significance of the issue goes far beyond economics. This immigration oversight affects individuals who have come here and lived here legally, identify as American, and don't remember any other country. "I wouldn't be fighting so much to push this information out and push this news out if I didn't truly love living in America," Castelino told Reason last year. "America is where I want to live. I love this country."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They really could be deported earlier.
We're stealing the best and brightest from other countries. Them going back at age 21, to share the American culture they were raised in, is good for both countries.
We shouldn’t be making decisions based on the impact on groups, the individual be damned. That’s the same kind of argument used for affirmative action in education. [I’m not saying these people have a right to stay here]
They could just stay like everybody else.
They can stay with you.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Pluggo volunteers to take in every under twelve.
The America's CHILDREN Act would allow individuals brought to the U.S. as dependents of employment visa holders to receive permanent residency if they've been present here for 10 years (eight of which were under the age of 21) and graduated from an American university. "I think it creates something that most Americans assume is already a reality," says Patel. "That would give true certainty for everyone that's impacted by this issue of growing up here as a child of a long-term visa holder."
I don't have a problem with this... as long as we stick to it.
I have a huge problem with it as the family visa lottery is already too large as it is. Replace the number in that lottery and make them first in line, then sure.
Even Canada relies more on a skill based visa system than we do.
Yeah, and how's that working out for them? Spoiler: not too well. Why on earth would you trust the government to figure out what skills are needed now, much less in future?
The problem I see is that graduation from an American university is required.
Better an employed plumber than an unemployed gender studies graduate.
YES!
I don't mind letting them stay either. But once they register, we will know where their illegal parents are and can deport them, right?
Did you read the article? The parents also came here legally. Why on earth are some people so eager to kick out people who overwhelmingly tend to be net contributors to society? "It's the lawww!" is a pretty bizarre justification from so-called libertarians. Plus, these people have demonstrated a willingness to play by the rules. I find it odd when people claim to support legal immigration, but are virulently opposed to making it easier and seem eager to kick as many as possible. There are certain words I don't like to fling around lightly, but it's hard not to have some suspicions.
as long as we stick to it.
Fiona will facilitate people actively violating it and then hold up those acting and knowing violations as though the prior system failed. I know this because not only does she frequently do this, she and Reason pretty flatly and frequently state, intentionally or not, they (at best) don't care for American culture and are fine with obliterating it down to the thinnest of imaginary constructs. Further, in other contexts (such as eliminating welfare spending) they will use the failings of the domestic policy as justification of defense of expanding the same policy to foreigners and/or larger groups of people considered to be native in a completely irrational and nonsensical fashion.
Even if Patel is proposing something in good faith, Harrigan and the open borders ilk are simply looking for a new billet to hone into a wedge to try and split their political oppositions' skulls open with.
shouldn't O be responsible for them?
They filled their two landscaping job positions in Martha’s Vineyard in the last Immigration Success Story. So there’s no more room at the inn.
I saw that lawn. Encampments can be built.
By the way, if Congress doesn't act, why wouldn't these dreamers simply apply in Canada? If they can't, or that's not a pathway for them, why isn't it... explain, in detail and show your work.
Done.
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada.html
Huh. Seems like there are requirements to be met that would exclude many people.
Has Fiona seen this? Maybe the endless migrant caravans can just keep on trekin' north.
Send them to ML? Haha.
I can accommodate all svelte, attractive, gullible women 18-60 with large asses and low standards. I'm pretty big hearted and woke that way.
Well, the DACA program was unconstitutionally implemented by a rogue executive. Sorry the dictatorial decree did not include these documented minors, but how do you hold an Imperial president accountable?
"Dreamer" - such an impressive piece of propaganda.
^^^ THIS ^^^ +1000000000000.
I call them DACAsses.
They're not here, legally, by virtue of the 0bama order not being legal, in the first place.
Congress HAS acted and the law says they should be deported, right fucking now.
Oh, so the sins of the parents can't be transferred to the children, Fiona? Don't you know how to do anti-racism?
OK, let's compromise. Dreamers and some other illegals can gain permanent resident status, but will wait like everyone else for application for citizenship. And we will grant the same status to all their offspring, regardless of where they are born.
And just to make clear, we will also outlaw any attempts to grant the vote to residents.
Only if they wait outside the country, just like all the others, that have applied and followed the law, that says they can't enter until given permission.
The DACAsses have already had many years of illegally enjoying America. Letting them wait, here, is manifestly unfair to those who haven't had that opportunity.
Face Self-Deportation When They Turn 21. When Will Congress Act?
Hopefully, when they turn 23
Why if only a real (NOT IGNORED…. Hut-Hum; DACA) immigration policy existed. Leave it to Democrats to really F’Shit up (Hut-Hum; Obama). Now immigration is just a big mess of gangland politics.
When it comes to immigration there’s only ONE factor that should be accounted for. Are you here to be part of the USA (defined by the US Constitution) or are you here to try and conquer-and-consume the USA with Nazism and [WE] mob RULES monarchy (keyword; DACA). Any immigrant in favor of DACA (An UN-Constitutional monarchy ruling) should be immediately sent back to their self-made sh*thole. Immigrants who find DACA an act of treason should be granted citizenship. It’s all about keeping treasonous invaders from conquering the USA; and the USA is losing that battle currently.
For sound economic perspective please go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Bitch, STFU!
Out of curiosity Fiona, what's your take on the cultural enrichment that France received recently?
It’s a riot!
It's certainly a hot place to be.
Bye.
Are these people geniuses that
Are a boon to the US or too stupid to know when their own 21st birthday is and too lazy to act accordingly?
"When Will Congress Act?" I scanned through the entire article and did not find an answer to this question. Why put something in the title of a piece that you don't intend to cover in the piece? Or maybe the title "When Will Congress Act?" is like the legal question, "Why did you stop beating your wife?"
They’re Here Legally, but Face Self-Deportation When They Turn 21. When Will
Congress ActThey Leave?Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>>Click the link————>>> GOOGLE WORK
They aren't here legally, though. They are illegal trespassers who have been graciously allowed to stay for the time being.
Imagine thinking that requiring people to obtain a permission slip from the government to stay where they live is somehow consistent with promoting personal liberty.
Squatters get forcibly evicted.
That's typically done at the request of the property owner, which I am for, not at the discretion of the voting public.
Conflating this with some property rights argument is either disingenuous or extremely collectivist in nature. Surely you're not saying you're for some sort of "public property right" where the majority of voters get to decide how I use my property are you?
There's this thing called "public property" you retarded fucking faggot. The border that defines the jurisdictional limits of the United States would be included in that. If you want to privatize all of the land on the US border and allow the property owners to decide how many drug addicts and sex traffickers they want to allow an easement through their land be my guest. I don't think the results are going to make your borderless international Marxist pee pee turgid.
Congress HAS acted. By choosing to not do what Fiona wants.
Like the DREAM act...
First introduced in House in 2001. Did not pass.
Reintroduced in House later in 2001. Did not pass.
Introduced in Senate later in 2001. Did not pass.
Included in immigration legislation in 2006. Did not pass.
Included in immigration legislation in 2007. Did not pass.
Added as amendment to upcoming 2008 DOD spending bill. Did not pass.
Reintroduced in Senate in 2007. Did not pass.
Reintroduced in House and Senate in 2009. Did not pass.
Reintroduced in House and Senate in 2010. Did not pass. Senate tried again 2 days later. Did not pass.
Reintroduced in House and Senate in 2011. Passed the House. Did not pass the Senate.
2012: Obama says since Congress would not act, he was forced to use executive authority to create DACA.
2017: Trump rescinds DACA. Congress reintroduces DREAM Act. Does not pass.
Congress ACTED! Many times! Fiona et al. simply don't like the results of the action and want to pretend that no action took place.
This country's failure to address the plight of young people who came to this country as children is a national disgrace. We are a country of immigrants that fails immigrant children.
Yes shreek, we all know how enthusiastic you are about smuggling sex-trafficked small children over the border.
Well, gee, Fiona, why don't you put your money where your mouth is and adopt them all? You'd have gardeners and maids for life!
I feel like this is a good opportunity to get our house in order. We need to follow the lead of european countries and do away with birthright citizenship. That would solve A LOT of our immigration problems rapidly. From there give a pathway to citizenship for anyone who can prove residence for the last X number of years. After that we need to go hardcore and penalize ANY business that employs undocumented immigrants. Then get back to the business of allowing immigrants on a legal basis, as needed.
They are NOT here legally. They are here ILLEGALLY, but Obama ILLEGALLY chose not to take action REQUIRED BY LAW. Once they are legal adults, they are free to leave on their own. There is NO SUCH THING as 'face self-deportation'. If they CHOSE to go to their country of origin, that is their CHOICE.
I’ve worked online c2 and been a full-time student this year, earning 64,000 USD so far. I recently discovered an opportunity for an online business, and I’ve been exploiting it sv04 ever since. It’s quite user-friendly, and I’m just glad I just found out about it now. Detail Are Here————————————>> http://www.dailypro7.com