Biden's Changes to Income-Based Student Loan Repayment Could Cost Billions
Biden plans to slash minimum monthly payments to just 5 percent of borrowers' income.

UPDATE: Since this piece was published in the August/September issue, the Supreme Court declared President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plan unconstitutional. Read Reason's coverage of the decision here, here, and here.
If the U.S. Supreme Court nixes President Joe Biden's plan to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loan debt for millions of borrowers, another portion of Biden's proposal could still leave taxpayers on the hook. And the final price tag for that aspect of Biden's policy could be double what his administration originally claimed.
Currently, federal student loan payments can be capped at 10 percent of a borrower's discretionary income, which the Department of Education defines as any income above 150 percent of the federal poverty line. Biden plans to lower the monthly payment to just 5 percent of a borrower's discretionary income. The new rule also forgives outstanding federal student loan balances after 10 years for borrowers who took out less than $12,000 and after 20 years for everyone else.
In short, many federal student loan borrowers will be asked to make monthly payments that are 50 percent less than currently required, and a substantial number will need to make those smaller payments for half as long as they previously did before their debts are eliminated entirely. That will mean more outstanding debts that are never paid off by borrowers, leaving taxpayers with the tab.
A recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis estimates that the 10-year tab for the revised income-based repayment rule would be $230 billion. Add another $45 billion if the Supreme Court stops Biden from wiping some loans off the books completely, because that will mean more loans are subject to the new rule.
By contrast, the Department of Education projected last year that Biden's income-driven repayment plan would cost only $138 billion. The administration's estimate did not take into account the likelihood that asking fewer people to pay off their loans would result in more student borrowing. Those "behavioral effects," according to the CBO, will drive the cost higher.
Any cost estimate for a government policy that doesn't account for incentives isn't worth the paper it's printed on. This failure is a recurring one for the Department of Education, which favors politically palatable price tags over trustworthy analysis. A 2022 Government Accountability Office report found that the department lost $197 billion on various student loan programs from 1997 to 2021. The department had projected a positive return of $114 billion during that period.
Instead of addressing the root causes of this fiscal mess, such as government subsidies that inflate costs, Biden is doubling down. It seems certain that the president's plan to help students who are struggling to pay back their loans will only encourage more students to take out loans that won't be paid back.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Making money online more than $25k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $28376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page...
🙂
AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> http://www.dailypro7.com
Fuck Joe Biden!
Working on the web pays me more than $190 to $225 per hour. I learned about this activity three months ago, and since then I have earned around $23k without having any online working skills. Copy the webpage below to test it….
.
.
For Details►———————————————➤ https://Www.Topearn7.Com
Let's Go Brandon!
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,600 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,600 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Joe Biden is a crook.
Fantastic work, Mike. Since I currently make more than $36,000 each month from just one simple web business, I commend your efforts. Despite the fact that these are the most basic internet operations occupations, you nd-05 may start making a reliable online income with as little as $29,000.
.
.
Modify your connection—————————>>> http://WWW.JOIN.HIRING9.COM
God that would be terrible. Can you imagine the government bailing someone out other than businesses?
Biden had been bailing out the Bandera regime in Kiev.
Shouldn't be bailing out businesses either.
Would've been better off letting banks collapse in 2008 than propping them up.
bailing out colleges even more despicable than bailing out businesses
Colleges *are* businesses, and that's who's really getting bailed out by this (and by the existence of student loans in the first place)
Government creates a problem. Government creates a bigger problem in order to “solve” that initial problem. Populace cheers the wonderful help of government.
maybe we should try cancelling mortgages, car loans, internet, etc. after paying reasonable payments for a x amount time?
Can you imagine students taking responsibility for their lives and taking majors that get them jobs, as opposed to being baristas with degrees in Womynz Studeez?
Tony forgets that we’re libertarians and don’t agree with bailing businesses out either.
Next he’ll pivot to PPP.
There is no end to the GREED of Gov-Gun packing "armed-thieves".
Democrats 'guns' make sh*t; don't you know. Just ask them.
They'll tell you all about what their 'guns' are going to make.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Go pay your fucking student loans.
"...the likelihood that asking fewer people to pay off their loans would result in more student borrowing."
Stating that those "behavioral effects" will cause more students to borrow seems more like fear mongering than anything and discounts virtually everything we know about kids in their late teens and early twenties.
Kids leaving high school who are college bound, by and large, have no concept of 20 years or what 5% vs. 10% of of their income will look like. None.
What most kids going to college believe is that getting a degree will equal a higher paying job in the future. This kind of long term debt is not much more than a mythical concept that will take care of itself in the future once a "career" has been established.
Sure, later they may come to realize that their advanced degree in reed based engineering isn't going to help them get a job that pays better than their current position as assistant manager of a local restaurant; but that is certainly not the prevailing 18 year old goin-off-ta-college mentality.
Easy/guaranteed loans are a problem for all the reasons you talk about, but I find it very hard to believe that better long term loan terms are going to incentivize many to take on student loan debt vs. not. Doesn't make it any less of a shitty idea though.
Loan counselors being paid a fee aren't going to entice prospective borrowers by noting "and the interest payments are only going to be half what they used to be!". Seems to work to increase demand when mortgage interest rates go down.
No argument that lowering the interest or payment amounts in most loans will increase demand. The entire housing bubble that popped a few years back was largely due to loans being offered were easier to get, had lower down payments, and offered lower monthly payments (...loan officers very much just ignored the whole "ballooning" bits when seeking the commission). Many people, very predictably, were shown to be fools who bought houses they could not afford.
But that isn't a student loan. Here, you have loans that will not require any sort of payments for several years, that are being offered to "kids" who have little to no real world experience with real personal finance, that have terms which are based on completely mythical future earnings (what the hell is 10% of future annual income to a degree seeking waiter?), and that have loan terms that are longer than many of them have even been alive.
Guaranteed loans are allowing college kids to jump feet first into massive debt and reeking havoc on the costs of higher education already. I just don't buy that changing the terms of these loans will have a major affect of the amount or number or amounts of these loans.
Here's a quick and easy solution to the student loan "crisis." Have schools give out the loans. Before you know it, all those useless degrees that serve no purpose other than employment for worthless professors will suddenly disappear as the colleges stop giving loans for degrees that don't get students jobs.
*Ding, ding, ding* But if we did that, how would Democrats bribe people to vote for them or launder “free” government money to the Democratic Party to pay for elections!?
>>could still leave taxpayers on the hook
we've been off the hook for decades our tax revenue is a bucket drop.
Every single policy this decrepit grifting liar implements is an unmitigated disaster.
Who said that Democrats are not as conniving and crooked as Republicans?
Sarc, sbp, sqrsly, m4ever, jfree, and my name sake Rev Arthur Kirkland (aka the bad Rev})
Making money online more than $25k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $28376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page…Click the link————>>> GOOGLE WORK
Democrats operating another vote buying scheme and giving themselves “free” government money to pay for the next election cycle. If you vote for a Democrat, you’re a garbage human being.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.SalaryApp1.com