San Francisco Gets $20 Million Zoning Reform Grant the Same Week It Halts New Housing For Casting Shadows
This is the second RAISE grant San Francisco has received since the Biden administration retooled the program to reward jurisdictions for adopting zoning reforms.

In late June, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to halt ten new townhomes in the city's Nob Hill neighborhood, citing the need for additional environmental review of the shadows the homes would cast on an adjacent park.
The next day, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced that San Francisco would be getting $20 million from a grant program that the Biden administration had allegedly retooled to incentivize zoning reforms and housing production.
That grant, from the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) program, will pay for additional bus lanes, bike lanes, and road widenings in the city's Bayview neighborhood.
This is the second RAISE grant that San Francisco has received since the Biden administration announced back in May 2022 that the program would be used to "reward jurisdictions that have reformed zoning and land-use policies" as part of its Housing Supply Action plan.
Grant applicants for RAISE and several other transportation grants would receive additional points on their application for detailing zoning changes they'd made to facilitate more housing construction, said the White House.
The first grant San Fran received—$23 million for road narrowing and bike lane additions on the city's Howard Street—was announced in August 2022. That award came a couple of days after California housing officials announced they were launching a first-of-its-kind investigation of San Francisco's housing policies and practices to determine if it was violating state law in shooting down so many projects.
Those who follow San Francisco development battles will know that city politicians have repeatedly halted the approval of housing projects over their potential shadow impacts. Most infamously, one property owner in the Mission District was ordered to complete three separate shadow studies in his quest to turn his laundromat into an apartment building.
Earlier this year, San Francisco received state sign-off on its plan to facilitate the construction of 82,000 new homes over eight years through changes to its zoning code and permitting processes. That raised the hopes of some housing reformers that the city government had turned a corner on its NIMBY ways.
The Board of Supervisors' vote against the Nob Hill project shows the city is sticking to its same old dirty tricks. The city's RAISE grant shows that it'll be continually rewarded by the feds for doing so.
In our federal system, there's obviously only so much the federal government should do to incentivize local governments to change their land use regulations.
But far from inappropriately strong-arming local officials with the power of the purse, the Biden administration is committing an arguably worse sin. It's using a program it has committed to the cause of zoning reform to subsidize the country's highest-profile housing policy bad actor.
That's a terrible signal to send. It tells all other zoning reform–adverse politicians and policy makers that they too can be handsomely rewarded with federal tax dollars while continuing to cynically shoot down sorely needed, privately sponsored, zoning-compliant housing projects.
The Biden White House's initial proposal to tie transportation spending to zoning reform was an interesting idea. Critics cautioned that retooling existing programs with priorities other than zoning reform would likely be ineffective. Increasingly, it's looking like this part of the Housing Supply Action plan is actively counterproductive.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What a conundrum. Why, it's almost like San Francisco has some ulterior motive going into this whole libertarian moment of upzoning. It's a chin-scratcher, to be sure.
Increasingly, it's looking like this part of the Housing Supply Action plan is actively counterproductive.
Remember when I was early in this whole UPZoning euphoria saying I felt like the Zen master saying, "We'll see" when everyone at reason was having their little parade about the YIMBY movement?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
I’am making over $15k a month working online. I kept seeing how some people areable to earn a lot of money online, so I decided to look into it. I had luck tostumble upon something that totally changed my life. After 2 months ofsearching, last month I received a paycheck for $15376 for just working on thelaptop for a few hours weekly. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried itcopy below web…
.
.
Click on the link below…………………… https://Www.Coins71.Com
For sound economic perspective please go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Fundamentally, why would SF, or any other wealthy city, get federal RAISE grants?
I suppose an argument could be made, for example, that the poorest (per capita) cities should get federal grants to help pull them out of poverty and thereby potentially increase the overall productivity of the country.
But what sense does it make to take money from residents of SF and NYC, send it to Washington, extract a bureaucracy tax, pile restrictions on the money, make SF and NYC beg for the money back, and then send the money back to them?
Bike lanes and "narrower streets" in SF offer little discernible benefit to anyone living outside the city and no discernible benefit to someone living in NYC. If SF doesn't think bike lanes and narrower streets are worth their own money, why do they think a taxpayer in NYC will find it more important than SF does?
People are much more judicious with their own things and money. Who hasn't treated a rental car less well than they would treat their own car? Who hasn't lived in a situation where they didn't pay some utility (such as water and electricity in a hotel) and paid less attention to the use of that utility than they would if they were paying directly? Who hasn't picked up "free" COVID tests "just in case" when they would never have paid $10 for them? (BTW, asking for a friend, does anyone want to buy about 60 home COVID tests?)
Actually the answer to your question as to why San Francisco or New York City or any other rich city would get RAISE grants is quite simple. The federal government, when run by Democrats, pays off Democrats throughout the United States, especially in so-called blue states. The Democrat Party takes cares of its friends.
^ It’s simple wealth redistribution.
That picture tells you sooo much.
* It's how you get out of San Francisco.
* But it takes you to Marin County, even more hypocritically rich than San Francisco.
* But there are many more options to escape further.
Could Sam Fran use some pf that money to help clean up all of the poop the homel…unhoused deposit daily on the stretta there?
$20 million. I wonder how many duplexes that will build in SF? Compared to say - anywhere.
Zoning reform is not the cause of C housing problems. Prop 13 is.
No, government is.
Stop blaming people for government problems.
Stop blaming government for everything that you want to avoid responsibility for fixing.
Government has intentionally blocked any attempts to fix anything.
SF is the way it is because it is how the voters want it to be. Fuck em.
Well hey, with the number of people fleeing California these days, will they even be needing to build new housing?
Why would their requests for free government money decrease just because of a decreasing population? Current policies, like shadow-banning* building projects and "road-narrowing" initiatives, seem designed to accommodate such a trend.
This has nothing to do with payoffs from the FedGov, rather with the "progressive" philosophy of governance, similar to how they respond to an increase in crime by applying for a grant to finance a study to determine which offenses should be decriminalized.
It's a kind of sympathetic magic, but with words. "Zoning reform, eh? Let's pretend they mean X and Y, when they obviously meant Z. Thus is reality changed."
*-un nouvelle explication, c'est pas?
Make money by creating an easy and quick strategy to work part time and get extra 30k or more on the internet. (y6 I earned 30,485 in my overtime in the previous month and am extremely happy with this work now. You can try this now by:-
Detail Are Here—>dollarbitcoin90.com
Additional bike lanes, wider roads. The heck with housing.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Everyone can make ( £26,000 __ £38,000 ) A Month Online Making nb money online more than £20k just by doing simple work With No Prior Experience Or Skills Required. Be Your Own Boss And for more info visit any tab on this site Thanks a lot just
Open this link==>> https://www.dailypay7.com/
our classmate's mother makes $71 an hour on the internet and she has been unemployed for eleven months.. the previous month her pay was $12616 working on the internet for 3 hours every day. go to======>====>>===>> http://www.dailypro7.com
I getting Paid upto $18953 in the week, working on-line at home. I’m full time Student. I shocked when my sister's told me about her check that was $97k. It’s very easy to do. everybody will get this job.Go to home media tab for additional details.
See---->>> http://www.Topoffer1.com