It Takes 6 Clicks To Cancel Amazon Prime and the FTC's New Lawsuit Says That's Too Many
The ideal number of clicks to cancel an online subscription may be four or five instead of six, but we don't need government to make that decision.

Customers dissatisfied with Amazon Prime—the $14.99 monthly subscription service that includes free shipping and unlimited access to Amazon's streaming television service—must jump over an unreasonable number of hurdles to cancel their memberships, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleges.
In a lawsuit filed Wednesday against Amazon, the FTC explains that consumers must click "a minimum of six times" to navigate from Amazon.com's main page through the entirety of the cancellation process. In the FTC's telling, this is a harrowing journey that requires users to navigate confusing options like "end membership" to, well, end their membership. One must also have the fortitude to endure a page in which Amazon tries to dissuade the cancellation with a reminder about the benefits of being a Prime member. This six-click process is deliberately difficult to navigate, the FTC claims, and is part of a "deceptive" scheme to lock consumers into their memberships.
Ah, but do you know how many clicks it would take to submit your feedback to the FTC about its decision to file this lawsuit? Seven.
That tally, courtesy of Patrick Hedger, executive director of the fiscally conservative Taxpayers Protection Alliance, sums up the silliness of the FTC's latest attack on Amazon.
To be clear, the too-many-clicks claim is the heart of the lawsuit filed Wednesday by the FTC, which asks a federal court in Washington to find that Amazon "used manipulative, coercive, or deceptive user-interface designs…to trick consumers into enrolling in automatically-renewing Prime subscriptions" and "knowingly complicated the cancellation process."
Maybe the ideal number of clicks to cancel an online subscription is four or five instead of six—but it seems unlikely that a federal court is the best venue to determine that sort of thing. Indeed, it seems absurd for the FTC to act as if this is a situation that requires government action at all.
According to The New York Times, there are more than 200 million Amazon Prime subscribers who spent about $35 billion last year on those memberships. Prime subscriptions are a major revenue stream for one of the world's most successful companies. Still, the available evidence suggests that people are opting into Prime memberships because they want to do so—or, at least, that they find the benefits worth paying for.
Likewise, there's little evidence that consumers are mad at Amazon's behavior. A recent Morning Consult report found Amazon to be the second most trusted brand in the United States, trailing only Band-Aid. In the same survey, it was reported that Amazon Prime users have a more favorable opinion of the company than the general U.S. population does.
Contrary to the FTC's lawsuit, there does not appear to be a class of individuals who need rescuing from Amazon Prime, a service that subscribers can cancel in less time than it takes to read an article bemoaning that the FTC is once again wasting coercively obtained tax dollars harassing a private company funded by voluntary transactions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
From the BBC…
“Amazon tricked and trapped people into recurring subscriptions without their consent, not only frustrating users but also costing them significant money," FTC Chair Lina Khan said announcing the suit, which was filed in federal court in Seattle.”
Wonder why Ms. Khan isn’t mentioned in Reason’s article. They’re generally on her case about trade rulings.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,500 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,500 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link----------------------------------------->>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here—————————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
It's smelling a lot like an agency trying to justify its existence. Or, at least the current size of its existence.
It’s those darn Christian Nationalists again
In the words of Mother Mary, come again?
Six months ago I lost my job and after that I was fortunate enough to stumble upon a great website which literally saved me. I started working for them online and in a short time after I've started averaging 15k a month... The best thing was that cause I am not that computer savvy all I needed was some basic typing skills and internet access to start.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> https://www.Salarybiz.com
The issue isn't the number of clicks. The issue is clearly that cancellation is not in an intuitive spot to look, and most importantly, it is easy to believe that you have cancelled your subscription without completing the final step, when you get to the "do you want to suspend or modify instead of cancelling?"
I don't know if it's egregious enough to warrant this response (gym memberships are much worse). However, it's not nothing, I confess that I, once, messed up and was charged for an extra month after my trial ended.
Or what Ben of Houston said, with much less Glibiddity.
Still comes off as exceptional levels of governmental nannyism.
"(gym memberships are much worse)"
When someone says they require direct access to my checking account, I tell them to get fucked.
What part of "instead" don't you understand?
Without weighing in on the FTC complaint specifically, (I’m sure it’s bullshit), but when I read a headline that says, “It just took six clicks to do X on the web” I always think about how doing a thing on a vendors website to get X or Y done yes, took only ‘4 clicks’, but 3 of those 4 clicks were ultimately found down a rickety unlit staircase and were hidden behind a locked door marked “beware of the Leopard”.
That is a much more colorful and accurate description of the typical case like this. Bravo.
I wish I could claim originality, but I cribbed it from a Monty Python skit.
Not unless Douglas Adams cribbed it for "The Hitchhikers Guide" from there too. (Which he may well have.)
Am I wrong? is that where that came from?
Yup, you're wrong. It's from the very beginning of the story when Arthur is explaining why the council's plans to build a bypass weren't exactly well publicized. Just before the Vogons make a similar argument about humans not popping over to Alpha Centuri to see the hyperspace bypass plans.
Clearly, these regulators have never tried to cancel a cable TV subscription.
True, the hard part is knowing where to click, but when I go to amazon.com on the website:
Hover over "Account" and click "Prime Membership"
Then click the big box that says "Manage Membership" that also says "update, cancel and more"
Then click "end membership"
Pretty damned straightforward. I guess there might be a few confirmation clicks, but I'm not clicking "end membership" unless I mean it.
Pretty much the same experience on the app.
Looking at the complaint, it seems the issue is that you have to hit "confirm" 3 times.
I suppose discovery could show how many times people fail to hit the third time, and then try again a month or two later.
It's not that it's difficult, it's that they are skimming from people who think they have confirmed their cancellation.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Does anyone else think it's ironic that the very next article is a Stossel video about declining economic freedom in the US?
Or did Mangu-Ward cleverly plan that?
I'm all in with the government on this one. Clearly using "end" instead of "cancel" is a scumbag corporate ploy to confuse. Nobody in the world says "end" when they mean "cancel".
Just like no one says woman when referring to a man?
Actually, all you have to do is call your Amazon Prime Delivery driver a racist slur through your Alexa-based doorbell, or have him think that you did, and they will cancel the whole thing for you immediately.
https://medium.com/@bjax_/a-tale-of-unwanted-disruption-my-week-without-amazon-df1074e3818b
Is Alexa related to HAL?
I still get my father's union magazine. He passed away in AD 1974. Now, I know why I still receive it!
'....but it seems unlikely that a federal court is the best venue to determine that sort of thing...' Really? What would be the best venue - binding arbitration between Amazon and the 'average voter', according to 30 pages of fine print explaining how fair it is and how it works, what law of what Country will be applied, and if you fail to dot every 'i', you lose! It's a 159 page complaint so I think it's a lot more complicated than complaining about 6 clicks to end your relationship with Amazon. It's an internet behemoth and subject to regulation. You should be able to log in to your account and click a cancel my account button. They are well aware that after 3 clicks most users are confused and abandon.
Decided by the consumer. People vote with their wallet. Bad reputations (such as a reputation for being difficult to cancel) will drive consumers to other sources for goods if they find Amazon to not be worth it. Having the government deal with every perceived nuisance is not the answer.
Yep, there it is in Article VIII of the u s constitution: "The executive branch shall determine the deceptiveness of all internet cancellation policies among the several states."
I have a proven method to cancel further services. I stop paying.
That can result in not only not cancelling the service, but being sent to collections as well.
How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?
There's your answer, Eric "I reluctantly voted for Biden" Boehm.
Even if it took a million clicks, I wouldn't complain if I could cancel out of social security.
The proposed settlement has good news and bad news.
The good news: You can cancel your subscription with one click.
The bad news: You must then sit through an episode of "The Terminal List".
Six Clicks? AT&T faces class action suits because it can take six years to get their old number autopay software to stop draining your bank account
Seriously though, why isn’t it one?
How many hoops should one have to jump through to say, “I no longer wish to do business with you.”
FFS, I get annoyed every time I do something on my computer and it prompts, “Are you sure?”
Yes, I’m f’ing sure. Why are you infantizing my computer use?
Can you imagine any other contract like that?
“I’d like to end my tenancy.”
“Are you sure?”
“Yes.”
“Please sign here to indicate you are sure.”
“Fine.”
“Here are some incentives for you to change your mind.”
“No.”
“Here are some other tenancy options that might be better for you.”
"Not interested.”
“Please add your contact information so we can reach you in the future with new offers.”
“No.”
“Are you sure you want to leave?”
“YES.”
“Please acknowledge again that you would like to leave.”
It sounds like Reason is defending this kind of garbage.
Wooosh!
Umm, it is not the government's job to prevent you from being annoyed.
I didn't say it was.
I said that at-will contracts should be easy to terminate at will. And I question anyone who's supporting a business practice that intentionally frustrates the termination of an at-will contract.
It's fine to be anti-government. But I didn't even mention them.
If I hire you to mow my lawn every Saturday and after a few weeks you say, "I quit." and I say, "No, sorry, not without signing all these forms in triplicate and turning down my other landscaping opportunities and jumping through these hoops I placed all over my lawn; otherwise get back out there and start mowing" - that's bullshit on my part.
And exactly how many clicks does it take to cancel the IRS?
80 million would probably be enough. Just vote for a real libertarian candidate for once.
Clearly the FTC has too much time on it's hands; let's cut their budget by 60% to focus their attention a bit.
”Amazon tricked and trapped people into recurring subscriptions without their consent, not only frustrating users but also costing them significant money,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said announcing the suit
“The US Government stole from taxpayers without their consent to fund a bloated bureaucracy, illegitimate wars, and enrich themselves and their campaign donors, not only frustrating taxpayers, but also costing them significant amounts of money,” The Angry Hippopotamus said.
The US government forced me to sign up for Social Security when I was a minor, if I wanted to work and earn money. They promised me the Social Security card would not be used for identification purposes, and I could retire at 65 with full benefits. They lied on both counts, and the original contract was void anyway, since I was a minor signing it under duress.
One click to sign up. One click to order (they're proud of that.) It should only take two clicks to cancel (Cancel -> Are you sure?)
But I see no reason to involve the government. Don't sign up if you don't like the exit terms.
But the funniest thing is people giving other examples of other companies where you can call and talk to a real person to cancel. As if that is easier! You usually get put on hold for 20 minutes, and then transferred to someone else, and then they do it wrong, and you have to call again a month later when you realize they messed up.
But I see no reason to involve the government. Don’t sign up if you don’t like the exit terms.
I believe part of the problem is that at sign up, no one knows what the exit terms are. Apparently, that is by design. While I wouldn't advocate for bureaucratic control, is government not the appropriate way to deal with contract disputes?
It's just Democrats kissing the asses of their Union masters.
I cancelled my Prime subscription at one point. Called the customer service number, waited on hold about 10 minutes, spoke to the agent for less than 5 minutes. Done
This is great for folks who live in areas that have basic telephone services, and where cellular service isn't touch and go.
I agree that too many (unprompted) FTC actions are a waste of taxpayer funds, and that a nanny-state solution isn't optimal. That said, this is arguably in the FTC wheelhouse, and if boehm is writing how terrible it is, the truth of the matter is likely somewhere 180 degrees or so from what is in the article. As others pointed out, the fact that he (?) decided to omit Lina Khan's reasoning for the FTC action is, interesting.
Cancellation is a lengthy, confusing process and you have to read carefully or you'll end up doing the opposite of what you want to do. It's ridiculous that this has to be acted on by the FTC, but going after companies that deceive customers is exactly why they exist.
I agree that it's absurd that Congress would weigh in on Amazon's cancellation practices, but I also think it's absurd that they have to. I've been working online for literally decades and cancelling was confusing to me as well. And when I finally got it done, they tricked me into signing up again when I ordered something. Amazon is slimy and tricky, and there's no excuse for it.
It’s obvious that no one at the FTC has tried to cancel their Sirius/XM subscription. It’s probably only six clicks too, but the links are hard to find, in unintuitive places, you have to read fine print, and the last click reveals that you have to call to cancel. So you call and push a bunch of numbers in response to an automated menu, finally get a person who all but refuses to cancel your subscription by making numerous offers including plans found no where on the website, and making you confirm several times. . I hope this lawsuit succeeds irrespective of its merits and puts the heebeegeebies in US businesses executives.
I'm all for the one click cancellation, plain, simple, and quick. "Do you wish to cancel your account? YES/NO. See how easy that is. I enjoyed Sirius/XM for a few years but finally got out when I just wasn't listening to it all that much. Long story short, years later they kept sending me these fabulous offers about a great low price for X number of months, etc. Reading the extremely fine print at the end of the offer revealed the only way you could cancel your account was to call a specific phone number. And we all know how that routine goes. But that was enough to prevent me from ever signing up with them again. Why do they have to make it so hard to cancel when they know the person attempting to cancel doesn't want to remain a customer any longer?