Butchers, Brewers, and Bakers Still Thrive in Urban Marketplaces
Adam Smith recognized that man has a natural "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange."

Across North America, local boosters are whisking visitors off to places like Detroit's beloved Eastern Market or Milwaukee's Public Market. An eager local guide will take them to Portland's food truck corrals or Vancouver's Granville Island. A more reluctant host may let them tag along for a Spam musubi lunch at Honolulu's Maunakea Marketplace or to pick through mid-century modern furniture at the Rose Bowl Flea Market in Pasadena, California.
Midway through a cross-country trip, the monotony of my hosts' ideas for how best to spend a day in their city started to wear on me. Yes, yes, your city has a great food hall, a great farmer's market, a great peddlers mall—as does every other city. But then it dawned on me that this is as it should be. Marketplaces are urban spaces par excellence, places that allow us to relish in the hustle, to see and be seen by strangers, to enjoy, as Pericles put it, all the good things of this Earth that flow into the city.
Adam Smith understood this when he suggested that man has a natural "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange." Smith was trying to explain why markets tend to emerge wherever more than one human being can be found. We don't spend our free time rifling through yard sales, haggling over prices, or promenading in malls because we have to—we do it because it's inherent to who we are.

Defying an Unkind Narrative
Today, the term market can refer to almost any aspect of human life. There are dating markets and commodity markets, emerging markets and futures markets. Most markets are, by now, almost entirely abstract, best represented by numbers and line charts. But ask a child to draw a market, and she will probably doodle a bunch of people manning stalls, hawking goods they've grown, made, or collected.
Literature hasn't always been kind to markets, or marketplaces. In Thomas More's Utopia, the namesake of the genre, markets are altogether absent, with goods mechanically administered from a warehouse on the basis of need. In Walden Two, a more recent technocratic utopia envisioned by psychologist B.F. Skinner, trade among residents is banned—for their own good, of course. One suspects that neither More nor Skinner ever felt the thrill of hunting for a collectible or the rush of negotiating down a price.
Video games tell a different story. In Animal Crossing: New Horizons, the player spends all her time befriending shopkeepers and scouring shops for furniture and clothing. Log into any massively multiplayer online role-playing game, like Old School RuneScape or World of Warcraft, and you'll find most players crammed into some central location in the game's main city, which the players—perhaps without any planning by the developers—have turned into a market.
If revealed preference counts for anything, perhaps saving the world isn't quite so fun as being a butcher, a brewer, or a baker.
Marketphobia
Back in the physical world, this indelible urge to truck, barter, and exchange forms the basis of cities. As the urban planner Alain Bertaud has argued, people principally gather to exchange goods, labor, and ideas. This is why cities follow a near-universal pattern of densities peaking around a central business district and declining outward. It's also why dedicated marketplaces are a near-universal urban design feature, from New York City's Times Square to Mexico City's Zócalo to Istanbul's Grand Bazaar.
It's ironic, then, that contemporary Anglo-American urban planning is almost completely defined by a phobia of markets.
The streets and sidewalks of American cities were once sites of spontaneous, unplanned marketplaces. As captured by the iconic 1900 photo of New York City's Mulberry Street in Little Italy, peddlers with pushcarts once set up shop along busy streets selling everything from peanuts to watches—an accessible kind of entrepreneurship that naturally appealed to immigrants. Any public space could turn into a marketplace, if the conditions were right.
This kind of informal market activity was stamped out by corralling sellers into discrete districts, mandating expensive licenses, or banning vendors altogether. Similar fights are underway in cities in regions across the developing world, where a quixotic quest for visual order and a reorientation of the urban public realm around the car has led to similar anti-vendor efforts in Latin America and Southeast Asia.
Likewise, markets once blended naturally into almost every neighborhood, even residential areas. As a trip to New York City's Tenement Museum reveals, the strict distinction between home and work is an entirely modern invention; historically, front parlors doubled as offices, workshops, restaurants. The same is true of neighborhoods: Even the most humdrum residential neighborhood was once served by corner groceries, barbershops, and bars.
Zoning's role in perpetuating the housing affordability crisis is well known. But equally pernicious has been the way zoning has excised markets from daily life. This is by design: Early 20th century Anglo-American elites saw the mere presence of market activity as corrupting. Such prejudices turned into zoning codes that strictly segregated land uses, producing a monoculture landscape of strip malls and subdivisions.
In pre-zoning neighborhoods in cities like Washington, D.C., one can still find the remnants of a lost world of neighborhood commerce, if you know where to look.
Shopkeepers Win
Markets find a way. Merely a decade into the project of planning suburbia, the need for some kind of public commercial realm became obvious, giving rise to the first shopping malls. The insatiable urge to monger meant that peddlers malls and flea markets survived in warehouses and parking lots. On any given Saturday in spring, lawns bloom with old books and clothes, as sleepy cul-de-sacs blossom into yard sale marketplaces. Farmers markets and food halls are now, in most cities, a definitive "thing" you must do.
In an age of two-day Amazon delivery, overpriced takeout food, and curbside groceries, we don't ever need to set foot in marketplaces. And yet, it's the first thing that many of us do the moment we have any free time. We try on clothes and examine wall-to-wall televisions that we know we could never afford. We compare prices, check for quality, and tactfully negotiate with clerks. We argue over which smell leads to the better lunch, and sit at the counter with stuffed bellies watching strangers go by.
We do this because it's fun—and not just for the consumer. In an apocryphal quote, Napoleon Bonaparte once disparaged England as a "nation of shopkeepers." But there is inherent dignity in entrepreneurship, a pride in being one's own boss, in mastering a craft, in serving a quality product that makes up for long hours and low pay.
The shopkeepers won, by the way.
Spontaneous Markets
Markets are forever sprouting anew. Down the street from my Los Angeles apartment, an emergent food hall forms at the intersection of two boulevards each evening. A churro vendor sets up shop first, followed by pupuseria. A fruit cart may join, and a Japanese food truck often follows. A taqueria sets up next to the bus shelter, serving tacos al pastor to evening commuters well past midnight.
I doubt anyone involved has ever read Wealth of Nations. But I suspect they could speak to Smith's posited propensity with greater clarity than many economists.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The streets and sidewalks of American cities were once sites of spontaneous, unplanned marketplaces.
The Invisible Hand used to be the defining aspect of America, but it's anathema to the central planners.
M. NOLAN GRAY is the research director for California YIMBY and a professional city planner.
Oooh, ouch.
too funny
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.Apprichs.com
Just work online and earn money. He now makes over $500 a day by working from home. I made $19,517 last month just doing this online job 2 hours a day. so easy and no special skills required…(n25) You can run google and then make this work.
.
.
.
Following this information:-:-:-:- https://DollerWorld2.blogspot.Com
As expected with Reason.
Fans of curated libertarianism, managed by elites?
Perhaps he is there to put the brakes on other city planners and to mitigate the effects of central planning.
That's the job of a city planner planner.
And you can’t hire that guy until the city planner planner planner plans for it.
Or maybe he's just there to post dark web links to hardcore child pornography, guv'nah shreek.
Yeah SRG, just like cops are there to stop the other cops.
City planners are my natural enemy.
City planners are my natural prey.
Still coming over for BBQ?
Adam Smith recognized that man has a natural "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange."
Acknowledged with a code consisting of a Ten and a Four, Special Friend! (Not that there be anything wrong with "Special Friends," of course!)
For the Sake of Mercy, we doth hast a Convoy! I will rendez-vous with thee at the corner of Flip and Flop! Exercise caution for Bruins of State seeking search and seizure of your carriage!
--Adam Smith and C.W. McCall mash-up. 😉
C.W. McCall--Convoy
https://youtu.be/Sd5ZLJWQmss
If city planners are going to exist, shouldn’t we be happy that some of them understand that there are limits to what can (or should) be planned and that spontaneous order is a good thing?
Unless you want to go to complete anarchy (which I'm all for), cities are going to be planned to some extent. Who do you want doing that? Some commie shithead who thinks central planning is the answer to everything, or someone like the author of this piece?
I likewise find it encouraging to know that at least some planners see the folly of micro-management and excessively rigid planning. But to acknowledge that, you have to be more interested in having an actual discussion than shitting on Reason. That leaves out most regular commenters. They're much too busy, 'cause that shit ain't gonna fling itself.
"Butchers, Brewers, and Bakers Still Thrive in Urban Marketplaces"
Not so much the candlestick makers.
Considering what "artisanal" candles and their decorative holders often go for, I'm pretty sure they're doing okay too.
Do you want to live someplace that looks like the picture?
No zoning!
"Well since this house is what I want (or want to pay for) and it isn't part of an HOA and only includes a 2000 sqft yard... Well then, Gov-Guns are already paid for by the very people I'm going to use them against to pretend to OWN them and their property like a landlord and so I can tell my neighbors what to do without having to pay for it!" /s
Maybe justice is served by being required to PURCHASE what one wants to pretend ownership of.
Start earning more than 600$ per day in timeshare. In my spare time after graduating from college, I made $18,781 from this job. Easy job and steady income is great. (a127)__ No skills are required for this position. All you need to know is how to copy and paste items online.Sign up today by following the details on this page.
SITE. ——>>> bitecoin.com
It's a city where no buildings are burning, so there's that.
No. But I don't want to live anywhere I can see a neighbor's house. Apparently people do like living in cities, though.
And there's a reason why commercial districts exist.
'The insatiable urge to monger meant that peddlers malls and flea markets survived in warehouses and parking lots. On any given Saturday in spring, lawns bloom with old books and clothes, as sleepy cul-de-sacs blossom into yard sale marketplaces. Farmers markets and food halls are now, in most cities, a definitive "thing" you must do.'
Speak for yourself. Some of us have better things to do with our time, even when our goal is to buy something, than to "shop". And for those of us that have our own minds and ideas, and often very specific ideas about what we want, the best vendors are online, e.g. McMaster-Carr.
"Adam Smith understood this when he suggested that man has a natural "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange."
That's probably true but there's an older deeper propensity. When is this urge to truck, barter and exchange most evident? During the run up to Christmas. That's the time that makes or breaks the retail business. And what is Christmas? It's when families, friends and acquaintances gather together to give gifts to one another. It even extends to complete strangers, like the beggars on the street given a few dollars to enjoy a proper meal. It's this propensity for gift giving which is the more fundamental.
The advantage of gift giving over market based exchange is that it solidifies social bonds. The Japanese are the experts on gift giving. The number of words for 'snow' in the Eskimo language tells you everything you need to know about their culture. In Japanese, it's the number of words for 'gift' or 'present.' What do the Japanese say about gifts?
"Free is the most expensive."
“The advantage of gift giving over market based exchange is that it solidifies social bonds.”
How do gift-givers acquire presents?
In Japan, it's often from other gift givers. It's not uncommon for a gift to go unused, unopened and passed on to others. The Japanese of course have a name for a gift that lives its life in a state of eternal transit.
So did Tolkien’s hobbits.
Gift giving predates even Tolkien's hobbits. It predates the market, the state, and goes way way back. The propensity of giving gifts is so old and deeply ingrained that it is even found in the animal kingdom, for the same reason people do it, to cement social bonds. What about the plant kingdom? Plants give us food and medicine, we help plants thrive and propagate. The notion that our relations with each other and the natural world need to be mediated in a market place is extremely narrow minded and ideological.
Hobbits famously gave other people presents on their birthdays.
When I moved to Denmark, I was told that it was a similar custom in that on your own birthday, you took your friends out to drink, and covered the tab yourself. That way, given a large enough pool of friends, you're almost always going to have a free night out each week. Or two.
Unfortunately, I later found out (after my birthday week) that this was simply a ruse to get free drinks, and not a legit custom. Live and learn.
To paraphrase Say: A gift to be given must first be produced. In any case, as long as it's all peaceful and voluntary it's all good.
"A gift to be given must first be produced."
I'm not suggesting otherwise. I'm saying gift giving predates market exchange.
Soooo...like fruitcake?
Andy Rooney pointed out that there are only 23 fruitcakes in the whole world. Nobody eats them. They just wait until next year at Christmas and give them to someone else.
'Course, you know it takes work to produce, transport and merchandise fruitcakes and everything else, right?
I'll let you figure it out while rickshawing, Watermelon.
"‘Course, you know it takes work to produce..."
Once it's produced it can be given away as a gift if you want. There are other options available as well.
But primacy belongs to the producer economy, Watermelon.
Ways and means aren't your strong suit are they?
I was discussing human propensities. Gift giving clearly is primordial. Market exchange is an afterthought.
Seems like gift giving, barter, and commercial trade are all segments of the same spectrum. Especially if we are talking about mutual, reciprocal gift giving.
No, it's all white elephant gift giving, with takebacks and thieving.
What is?
They tried that in the Bronze Age. It didn’t end well.
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0691168385/reasonmagazinea-20/
Kings and emperors would tell each other what gifts they wanted, then complain if the sender got it wrong.
If you feel you have to complain about the gifts you received, or the gifts cause resentment, then something's not right. It might not end in the collapse of your civilization, but perhaps estrangement or animosity, which is bad enough.
Gift giving and market exchange are two completely different things with different purposes and ends, not alternative ways to accomplish the same things. There is no "advantage" of one over the other.
Gift giving is about solidifying social relations. Market exchange is about addressing surplus and deficit. They are not entirely different because both involve the transfer of goods.
"There is no “advantage” of one over the other."
If your object is to make friends and accumulate social capital, then gift giving is probably the way to go. It's the older and more fundamental of the human propensities in question. It's even evident in the natural world. If your goal is to accumulate goods, then a market exchange is what you're looking for.
What do you consider examples of gift giving in the non-human animal world?
There's many examples. Crows will leave shiny objects for people they've developed a relation with. More typically gift giving is a part of the mating ritual, our most fundamental social relation.
I think you might be anthropomorphizing a bit there.
Anyway, what point do you think you are making here? Are you suggesting that gift giving can replace market transactions? Once you get beyond family sized groups there has to be more formalized exchange.
"I think you might be anthropomorphizing a bit there."
Because humans and non humans share behavioral practices?
“Anyway, what point do you think you are making here? ”
Gift giving is older and more fundamental than market exchange, and helps social bonding.
" Once you get beyond family sized groups there has to be more formalized exchange."
There are some 100 million people in Japan. Their customs of gift giving are thriving. And don't think the customs aren't formalized.
You talk about it as if the entire population of Japan is exchanging gifts with each other. Which is dumb. GIfts are exchanged among people who know each other. And it is highly formalized (as is pretty much everything in Japan). Which is good and all. But it's not in any way a substitute for markets as a way for people to get what they need, generate wealth and happiness and generally improve life for all. Cultures where people expect to be given what they need as gifts do not prosper and grow.
"You talk about it as if the entire population of Japan is exchanging gifts with each other. "
They do like giving gifts. It's a national trade, evident in the language they speak. I don't suggest it's a substitute for market exchange, as you'll find markets everywhere in Japan. Gift giving improves social relationships. People don't engage in it expecting to become wealthy.
"Cultures where people expect to be given what they need as gifts do not prosper and grow."
I don't know any such cultures. Japanese people typically do waged work to get what they need to survive. They don't rely on gifts. Again, gifts are a social lubricant.
Lot to unpack in this article.
This is why cities follow a near-universal pattern of densities peaking around a central business district and declining outward.
Well part of that is a no-duh statement – if cities didn’t get less dense, then the entire world would be one city. But it got me to thinking – and I found a density map of different cities. Some – Johannesburg for sure and very possibly all of them – are multiple older cities that just kind of grew together. Those places only work if each of those older cities (now neighborhoods) retains some commercial core of its old self. London was quite compact until the 20th century when it sprawled way out. So that density map is more a function of time than of some development plan. My guess is that those sprawled out areas are the money pits for infrastructure spending and that will soon enough show up in some housing/real estate shock. Because two reasons:
That photo of Southdale Center – the first suburban indoor shopping mall – built in 1956 – is a relic. There’s a history of it at Business Insider. It’s still alive but basically walking dead for nearly 20 years now. The third round of new anchor tenants each of which last a few years. That part of suburbia was killed by Amazon and cannot repurpose itself because of zoning and the way the suburbs were built up. If/when the city core loses its economic base, all those suburbs will lose their reason for existence. They already are unless life is all about living in the middle of nowhere, and in the middle of a bunch of cookie cutter houses, off grid, and buying shit from Amazon. And there’s nothing they can do about it. That’s why a simple clear-the-decks-and-get-a-restart recession – so necessary for an economy in the long run – is freaking kryptonite for the banking system. But hey – maybe we can central plan ourselves out of any real recession – forever. That’ll work won’t it.
The second example is what everyone seems to criticize as the height of Big Bro. The 15 minute city. Paris says it is trying to do that – but in truth for food at least, Paris is already a 5 minute city. It has at least 1200 bakeries (and Ive seen one site that says 30,000 but that smells more like bullshit than a baguette). I’ve seen a map of them too and they are all over the place on like every couple of blocks. That is not a the result of a zoning commission deciding where to put every low-density small-scale exception to the big res/comm/indl zones. It is the result of – spontaneous order. Thousands or tens of thousands of entrepreneurs spreading themselves out to get space for themselves to attract customers via the smell of fresh baguettes first thing in the am.
Actually paid has laws requiring bakeries, and regulating that at least one has to be open at all times within a certain area. Bakers in neighborhoods actually trade holidays because one of them is required by law to stay open.
I believe the bakeries are subsidized as well. France's "traditional" food scene is not at all representative of spontaneous order. It is highly curated and subsidized.
Aah. Well that makes sense.even if I still do like the story about the smell of baguettes and croissants in the am.
So this is more like a different part of Smith -
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary.
So Paris does seem to be making those assemblies necessary. OTOH - not sure how different that would be much different from a practical 'free market' other than the absence of the smell of freshly baked bread here in the US. As Smith says - the meetings are going to happen anyway in a free market.
So what does the US do to encourage/channel that sort of 'conspiracy against the public? And how is that different than what the dirigiste French do? Certainly zoning would be a huge 'facilitation' at minimum - requiring POTENTIAL bakers to meet in a delimited commercial zone to carve up their market before they even go into business knowing that said baker is not allowed to operate elsewhere. As would the distortions favoring incorporated/franchised bakers rather than sole proprietor bakers.
Now how do the French manage all this while not working more than 33 hours a week and retiring in their 50s and donning yellow jackets and sticking and fighting in the streets?
None of what you said makes any sense at all. You would be a terrible city planner. But, I'll still allow it, because I think that city planners need to burn to death in a fire.
Plan your SRO utopian city, JFree, plan away.
The central business district and radiating outward is a relic of a bygone era, when transportation was limited to walking, rickshaws, horses, and horse-drawn carriages, then to a lesser extent, cars and trucks. But now, no one needs to be in the same physical space, at all. Warehouses are better located where land is cheap. People can meet virtually from their own homes, in safe neighborhoods not run by Progressives.
Sometimes it's useful to actually see or handle the stuff you want to buy.
I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE. I hope you also got what I...go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart......
SITE. ——>>> bitecoin.com
The central business district and radiating outward is a relic of a bygone era
That's why I brought up what those actual city density maps look like and how real world cities developed over time. The central business district radiating outward is not a relic of a bygone age because it never happened that way. At least not naturally. Here's a density map rendering of Europe. Only France and Spain look like the scenario mentioned with widely separated cities and completely rural in between so each individual city seems to develop in isolation and radiates out. Those two look starkly different than everywhere else. Italy, Rhine area, England look more like small cities that connect, intensify their connections, then over time merge into one or into a spine (maybe along a natural geographic feature).
The latter is also how NYC happens. The five cities all develop separately (by merging previous villages) and then merge in 1898. Only afterwards did Robert Moses attempt to impose a different structure. Of a central business district radiating outwards. Which was done by demolishing hundreds of thousand of housing units and replacing streets/housing with highways. A master plan. Same thing happened in LA during the streetcar era.
What about candlestick makers?
They lost their lawsuit against the sun and have been relegated to obscurity.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Marketplaces find a way...it's just this one isn't yours. Go away!
McAfee: Protecting Your Digital World with Advanced Security Solutions. McAfee is a leading global cybersecurity company, dedicated to safeguarding individuals, businesses, and governments against the ever-evolving threats in the digital landscape. With a comprehensive suite of innovative security products, McAfee provides cutting-edge antivirus, identity protection, and data privacy solutions. Trusted by millions of users worldwide, McAfee delivers proactive and intelligent protection to ensure your online experiences are safe and secure.
Mcafee.com/activate download
Does McAfee have a dating app where you can right-swipe your favorite whale? 😉
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Earn over $600 a day easily from your own time sharing home. I made $18,781 from this job in my spare time after graduating from college. “r111 years of easy work and steady income is amazing. No skills required for this position. All you need to know is how to copy and paste anything online.Sign up today by following the details on this page.
.
.
.
Here I am _______ GOOGLE WORK
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.salarybiz.com