Online Learning During COVID-19 Linked With Lower Test Scores
A new study has found that the more schools kept kids online, the worse their pass rates on state standardized tests were.

A new study has found even more evidence that extended school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to considerable learning loss among American schoolchildren—this time, directly linking higher failure rates on standardized tests with more time spent out of the classroom and in virtual instruction.
The new study, published in the American Economic Review: Insights this month, looked at data from 11 state standardized tests across grades 3–8 and found that pass rates on these tests had declined significantly from 2019 to 2021, with an average decline of 12.8 percentage points in math and 6.8 percentage points in English language arts.
However, the study found that schools that offered fully in-person instruction, as opposed to fully online instruction, did not experience such a decline in test scores. "Offering fully in-person learning, rather than fully virtual learning, reduced pass rate losses by approximately 13 percentage points in math and approximately 8 percentage points in" English, the study reads. Even offering hybrid instruction lessened the blow: Hybrid schools reduced their educational losses by "7 percentage points in math, and 5 to 6 in [English]," when compared with fully online schools, according to the study.
"Our analyses demonstrate that hybrid or virtual schooling modes cannot support student learning in the same way as fully in-person instruction can, at least during this elementary and middle school period," the study concludes. "As such, educational impacts of schooling mode on students' learning outcomes should be a critical factor in policy responses to future pandemics or other large-scale schooling disruptions."
The study's findings should hardly be surprising. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test scores released last year showed staggering declines in performance that wiped out two decades of improvement in math and reading scores among a representative sample of fourth- and eighth-graders.
And just last month, a report from the National Center for Education Statistics found that American public schools reported, on average, that 49 percent of their students were behind grade level in at least one subject at the beginning of the 2022–23 school year—up from just 36 percent before the pandemic.
This latest study just confirms what many had assumed from currently available data and what many had warned could be the result of extended school closures. Extensive online-only instruction doesn't help kids learn, and when we keep kids online for months or years, the consequences are steep. These reports and this latest study should, as the study suggests, "serve as a starting point for education leaders and policymakers as they weigh where to target funding moving forward in order to support student learning."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Working on the web pays me more than $120 to $130 per hour. I learned about this activity three months ago, and since then I have earned around $15k without having any online working skills. open the webpage below to check it
.
.
.
.
HERE——-⫸≻Reason7.com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
I'm sure that this is shocking to Randi Weingarten and absolutely no one else.
She's a fucking useless cunt.
Wrong. She's way worse than useless. If I pull out my jack to change a tire and it doesn't, work its useless. If I pull out my jack to change a tire and it causes millions of kids to have their future get screwed it's evil.
The worst person on Earth.
When the government provides a service, this should be the level of quality we should expect.
Governments cannot adequately provide services to any degree of quality by design. Legislation that creates agencies never changes, so the services they provide are essentially locked in time. Additionally, many of the services are forced on the citizens through additional legislation, which prevents competition at commoditized levels.
Once the government gets out of the "services" business, we should expect higher quality social and academic experiences.
I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on.the accompanying site…
.
.
Following this information:-:-:-:-:-:-:- https://Www.Coins71.Com
Extensive online-only instruction from public schools doesn't help kids learn
fixed it
Yes. There are plenty of kids doing great with online schooling. The carelessly cobbled together online programs that the teachers' unions forced on students during COVID fascism were crap.
But the number of autistic girls pushed into *checks notes* gender affirming care increased 10 fold, so it's all swings and roundabouts.
Feature, not a bug.
Social/Emotional Learning®
As a surprise to no one. At least the unions were "safe" and classrooms wastefully sanitized instead of better ventilated.
Now if they can only move the good teachers into the poor neighborhoods to bring up learning levels everywhere. Of course, the unions will be against that as well.
If the good teachers were hamstrung by the rules and procedures of the urban schools, they wouldn't make much difference.
Exposure to water linked with being wet.
100 % safe and effective with no downsides!
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Headline: "Obvious Outcome Occurred"
Well, at least this proves that public schools are better than nothing.
so ... exactly where that dude Randi Weingarten wants the kids yes?
“Headlines from three years ago today!”
Just read the comments and skip the articles, and you'll be 2-3 years ahead.
Amen
They needed a study? Some things are self-evident.
The overall results of this study really do seem obvious and unsurprising. But drilling down is a bigger problem.
The recent study looks like the sort of stats study that one would expect from any organization that measures stuff and manages what they measure. In this case, one that wants to go in post-facto and try to figure out what happened so that they can come up with something actionable re a big unplanned event. What's weird and problematic is that only 11 states (CO, CT, MA, MN, MS, OH, RI, VA, WI, WV, WY) were able to provide all the info needed for the study. I would expect some would just not bother (it's not required of them) and others would gather data in a quirky way that doesn't fit. But 39 out of 50 (and 9 of the 10 biggest) can't even provide data for a simple/predictable management type study?
It's not like they aren't collecting data. Two of the earlier studies cited here collected data from all 50. From organizations that are parts of the federal gov. Those questions and data aren't actionable. They are simply part of an annual report card of data gathering. That gets reported by the media and pols at a completely superficial level.
This is the worst outcome of nationalizing/centralizing education. Responsibility for managing it at the state and local level is eliminated - and sooner or later even the knowledge to manage it at that level disappears.
We set up - all 50 states - an interstate compact for education in the 1960's. Just as the constitution allows. 'Testing' (for the main purposes of placing newly relocated students and benchmarking outcomes) was the main thing they did. But they also understood other school related issues - from closures to contagious disease - and would have picked up newer issues like online learning. Driven by the states with no federal mandates. Maybe some federal funding but that's secondary with an interSTATE compact.
We then gutted that compact in the 1980's. So that we (esp the biggest states) have no fucking idea what to do themselves. Just fill in federal data forms like a zombie and wait for TopMen to tell them what to do with no understanding at all. I sure as fuck wouldn't want to have a kid in public school in one of those 39 states. Not that the 11 have better known outcomes. But the 39 will never even know what to do next and have no means of pressure from below even being exerted on them.
yes, that's why its good to take care of yourself with the health tips that we really needs and Healthy Supplies is the hub https://healthysupplies.online/