Review: You Hurt My Feelings
Little lies.

Lies of the little white variety are one of life's most useful social lubricants. Let's say your loved one asks you how they look, or how you like this gift they've brought, or this steaming slice of broccoli pie they just set before you. Are you really going to feel a need to muster honest answers to such questions? To volunteer that the loved one looks a little drawn, to be honest; that the unsolicited gift will immediately disappear into some seldom-visited drawer; that broccoli is the devil's vegetable? No, you're not going to say any of those things. You're going to lie.
Is there any good reason not to? That's the question writer-director Nicole Holofcener contemplates in her new movie, You Hurt My Feelings. It's a small question, and the picture is appropriately small-scale. But the issue it deals with is real, which is what keeps you tuned in to its modestly funny, low-key story.
It takes place in the Woody Allen world of prosperous Manhattan professionals, chief among them a writer named Beth (Julia Louis-Dreyfus, also the star of Holofcener's 2013 film Enough Said). Beth has published one book—a memoir that was received fairly well some years back—and for the last two years she's been working on a novel, encouraged through periods of self-doubt by her loving husband Don (Tobias Menzies), who's a psychotherapist. Don has read every successive draft of Beth's new book and has always told her he loves them. Her support circle also includes her sister Sarah (Michaela Watkins), who's an interior decorator, and Sarah's husband Mark (Arian Moayed), an actor. Beth herself always endeavors to provide encouragement for her son Eliot (Owen Teague), who's an aspiring playwright
In a clothes store one day, Beth comes upon Don and Mark standing in an aisle, engrossed in conversation. She stops nearby to listen and hears Don telling Mark about Beth's book—and how much he dislikes it. Beth is crushed, and at home Don is puzzled when she starts freezing him out.
As it happens, Don is having troubles of his own in his therapy practice. None of his patients seem to be making headway under his professional ministrations, and they barely disguise their resentment. ("God, he's an idiot," one man mutters on his way out of the office.) Then there's a couple (played by real-life spouses David Cross and Amber Tamblyn) who use their therapy sessions as an arena in which to continue the bitter squabbling that has drawn them to seek Don's help in the first place.
These two, we clearly see, could use an introductory course in little-white-lying. On the other hand, even the most well-intended fibs can misfire, too. Eliot recalls his mom encouraging him to pursue a childhood dream of becoming a competitive swimmer—a pursuit for which he had no gift. "She was just being supportive," Don tells his son. But Eliot isn't buying that. "You set me up to fail," he says, still hurt and angry.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Semi-OT ... I rented the movie A Man Called Otto primarily because the subject seemed innocuous enough, and Tom Hanks movies are generally good enough. It's about an old man, forced into retirement, wife died recently, his several attempts at suicide all fail, and new neighbors gradually give him new hope in life ... apparently.
I say "apparently" because about half way through, they throw in a transgender newspaper boy who thanks Otto because his late wife, a school teacher, was the only one at school who didn't treat his transgenderism as making him a freak.
Damn that pissed me off, so I quit watching. I doubt very much the rest of the plot required child transgenderism, anything "freakish" could have done the trick, even a simple ugly facial birthmark, and it must indeed have been as a child if this happened several years before when the late wife was still a teacher.
Hollywood sure does like to piss off their public and give people reasons to not see new movies. Maybe Bud Lite and Target will wake them up out of their woke attitude, but I kinda doubt it; the entertainment industry is full of entitled wokies.
Saw it on Netflix. To cap it off for you. He finds reasons to live then dies of natural causes. He leaves all his money to his neighbors. The end.
Speaking of...I'm watching a series called October Faction on Netflix. Not very good. Turns out it's another series made by children for children. Poor writing full of nonsensical dialogue, situations and actions. And to your point, it's chock full of gay people and inter-racial couples. Meh.
Oh, the rest of the plot was predictable as soon as he turned out to be a grump, with the neighbors narrowing it down. The only question was how much transgenderism would infect the rest of it, and I didn't care.
Like most heist and spy thrillers, the ending is seldom in doubt. Watched that Stratham dud, Orson Fortune or something; like watching Bob Ross paint by numbers. No surprises, no twists, plodding, predictable, fights and car chases included. What a waste of Aubrey Plaza, as if Bob Ross's paint-by-numbers was a portrait of her and done from a photo than her in person.
Bob Ross didn't paint by numbers! He made his worlds from scratch, thirty magical minutes at a time. And if that first tree looked lonely he'd give it a friend, even trees need friends.
WAY more compelling than anything I've seen moviewise in a long time.
I say “apparently” because about half way through, they throw in a transgender newspaper boy who thanks Otto because his late wife, a school teacher, was the only one at school who didn’t treat his transgenderism as making him a freak.
These story elements are more than likely thrown in to satisfy Hollywood DIE requirements, and I'm not kidding. I've read about this from insiders, and this is now the way Hollywood operates. A script is pitched, the show-runners go over it and if they like the script, they then have script doctors to throw in DIE themes, and you can tell because they feel 'crowbarred' in.
One example I ran across was an HBO show called Mare of Easttown starring Kate Winslet. Now I'll watch Kate Winslet on a cooking show because I think she's such a great actress, and generally anything she's in is going to be good. The show was good, Winslet's performance was quite excellent.
The show was a murder/mystery type thing with a missing girl in a small Pennsylvania town in which everyone has some skeleton in their closet. (In fact, that was the reason I stopped watching it-- it was too unrealistic in that everyone had something awful they were hiding and at some point it stretched credulity to me). However, among all the storylines which served the central plot, there was this side story with her daughter who was a lesbian and having teenage relationship problems in college with another young BIPOC lesbian girl. I had no issue with the performances from the actors, they were all perfectly competent, but the whole story line felt entirely tacked on, like when the script was pitched the producer said, "Yeah, I think we're gonna greenlight this, but we need some DIE elements added to the show."
Writer: What are you talking about, there are two black characters.
Producer: Yeah, that's not good enough... look, don't worry, we have script-doctors for this.
The frustrating thing about this is when you notice and complain, someone always responds, "Oh, you're offended because gay people exiiiiist!"
But it's more nuanced than that. It's tacked on in an after-the-fact manner and even moderately critical normies can feel it.
Exactly. I have the same visceral tacked-on reaction to most sex scenes -- the plot is running right along, things happening, things said, and suddenly everything gets put on hold while the guy sweeps the kitchen island clear of bowls and spices and implements of cooking, they tear clothes off to show enough skin for that R rating, closeups of sweaty skin and maybe a butt or nipple or two, and then back to your regular car chases and fights.
I also remember positively hating The Tin Men, I think it was, about several salesmen. The cussing was the most artificial forced unnatural nonsense, as if ChatGPT had written it, or a bunch of high school freshmen. I cussed better before boot camp. The best cussing movie was Repo Man, like a breath of fresh air compared to most Hollywood trash.
Julia Louis-Dreyfus is enough to me to pass. I just don't find her entertaining enough to overcome her politics.
Huh, for me, she'd be the reason I'd watch (which I won't). Her performance in Veep convinced me she has the chops not just to be a great comedic actor, but a serious dramatic actor.
Everybody in the film has "politics". Have you researched every single person, or are you just fixated on her, you drama queen?
I'm kind of over the upper-middle class therapy-based shows. It feels like an overused device.
You hurt my feelings: the Sarcasmic story.
This seems like a deeply unpleasant film, not just in the subject, but in the casting.
Thanks for the review, now I know not to see it, even if free on prime.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Yup.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link—————>> http://Www.Pay.hiring9.Com
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Lying is coercion. The ONLY time it may be excused is when it is done in self defence. When a liar coerces someone to lie effectively holding a gun to their head.
Two wrongs don’t make a right. If the truth paints you in a bad light, you’re bad, lying to others about it doesn’t and never will change that fact.
When an educator teaches your child that the mutilation and sterilization resulting from sex change surgery is “normal”, and expects them to recite it or fail, YOUR CHILDREN ARE BEING COERCED, only because our society tolerates lying.
Society never openly tolerated lying like it does today. Truth and lies are regarded with equal skepticism. Society has gone to shit.
There’s only one way out, criminalize lying.
I have the right to offend you. It’s called free speech and used to be valued.
Have you noticed how nice, polite and politically correct the communist Chinese and North Korean peoples are? They don’t offend anyone with their speech. They are also coerced.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Google pays $300 on a regular basis. My latest salary check was $8600 for working 10 hours a week on the internet. My younger sibling has been averaging $19k for the last few months, and he constantly works approximately 24 hours. I'm not sure how simple it was once I checked it out. This is my main concern............. GOOD LUCK.
.
.
BONNE CHANCE…............................ https://Www.Coins71.Com
100% true, but there's another reason not to lie.
"The chains of habit: To weak to be felt until they're too strong to be broken".
"It's a lot easier to STAY out than to GET out".
*
In 2009, the Philadelphia Phillies made it to the World Series, in response to which, my neighbor's twelve year old son implored his mother to get tickets to at least one game - a task she assigned to me
hello
hello fhf