Minnesota Caps Length of Probation Sentences
A Reason investigation earlier this year detailed the case of a Minnesota woman who was sentenced to 40 years on probation for a drug crime.

The Minnesota Legislature passed changes to its probation system last week that will cap probation sentences at five years for most offenses, and it will apply retroactively, meaning those with longer sentences will be eligible to have their terms reduced.
That will be welcome news for Minnesotans serving long probation sentences, like Jennifer Schroeder. Reason profiled Schroeder's case earlier this year in an investigation into the problems with probation systems across the country. Schroeder was sentenced in 2013 to a year in jail for a drug offense—and 40 years on probation. As it stands, she won't be off probation until she's 71 years old, in October 2053.Â
"I don't think I've ever met anybody," Schroeder told Reason, "even people who have murdered other people or assault or arson, or any big crimes I can think of, that has a sentence that long."
The legislation, part of a large omnibus bill, codifies a five-year cap on probation enacted in 2020 by the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission. Now, Schroeder and other Minnesotans serving probation sentences longer than five years will be eligible for resentencing.
At the time of Schroeder's sentencing, Minnesota allowed probation sentences to be up to the maximum sentence you could get in prison for the crime. Her case was an extreme outlier, but it illustrated both the problems with the state's statutory scheme and the deeper issues with probation itself.Â
Schroeder, who has since graduated from college and become a drug and alcohol counselor, testified in support of the legislation earlier this year. "The [number of] people that are violating on minor infractions and getting sent back to prison is astounding," she said in a committee hearing. "And the fear that you live with if you're on probation and you're doing the right thing is still something that resonates with me every day."
Probation has quietly turned into the largest form of correctional control in the country. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, of the estimated 5.5 million adults in the U.S. who were under some form of corrections control at the end of 2020, more than half—3,053,700 people—were on probation.
Probation's original purpose was to help people get their lives back on track without punishment while staying accountable, but in many states, it's become an alternate system of punishment that sets offenders up to fail. For example, Idaho has a staggeringly high rate of prison admissions for probation and parole violations. According to a report last year from the Idaho Department of Correction, 80 percent of 2021's admissions were for parole or probation violations.
The Minneapolis Star Tribune reported last year on how an extended probation program for juvenile offenders had turned into a "back door to prison," funneling minors into adult prisons for technical violations of probation.
In addition to numerous terms and conditions that probationers must follow, lest they be sent back to prison, they also lose many civil rights, such as the right to own a gun and the right to vote.Â
But some states are trying to get a handle on their bloated, ineffectual probation systems. Earlier this year, Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz also signed a bill into law restoring the right to vote to people on probation and parole, a move that re-enfranchised an estimated 55,000 people in the state.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is confusing in the same way as the no-cash bail argument, where half the people thought that meant release without bail and half the people thought it meant detention without bail, and what it really meant was increased prosecutorial power to jail or free people at personal discretion.
The author is implying that this law shortens probation sentences. For all we know, it very well could change a lot of probation sentences into prison sentences.
It will undoubtedly have that effect in some cases. But I think we can agree that 40 years probation is ridiculous. That's not something a judge should do.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Agreed. You can't use "Well, they might do something even worse!" be an argument against stopping something stupid and evil. The argument should always be against what is wrong, no matter how wrong it is, no matter what the "alternative" is, because if the alternative is another evil then that too can be argued against. The way to stop doing evil is to stop doing evil.
Perhaps there was a 40 year mandatory minimum for this drug offense. The judge thought that was ridiculous, so made it probation. It's still ridiculous, but less damaging than prison.
I wonder if Minnesota will also pay reparations to those whose home equity they stole.
Let’s not hold our breath
Google pays $300 on a regular basis. My latest salary check was $8600 for working 10 hours a week on the internet. My younger sibling has been averaging $19k for the last few months, and he constantly works approximately 24 hours. I'm not sure how simple it was once I checked it out. This is my main concern............. GOOD LUCK. Â
.
.
BONNE CHANCE…............................ https://Www.Coins71.Com
From a regime perspective, having massive numbers of people on probation seems ideal. You get to quietly deny people their rights, thus suppressing dissent and creating a chilling effect on those who might otherwise stand up to government abuse, along with a free ticket to keep tabs on them, without the expense or bad publicity of actually keeping people incarcerated.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM