L.A. Spent $7,500 on a Prototype Bus Shade That Doesn't Shade Anything
When the state won't shade you, buy a hat.

When the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) officials held a celebratory press conference last week for a pilot bus shelter design, Twitter users and bloggers began doing what the bus shelter could not: casting shade.
At press event for new @LADOTofficial @cd1losangeles bus stop shade/light structure "la sombrita" at 3rd & Union pic.twitter.com/5CgdfNfe2Y
— StreetsblogLA (@StreetsblogLA) May 18, 2023
Commenters were quick to note that the thin, perforated "La Sombrita" structure would do little to keep the single person that would be able to stand underneath it out of the sun. Its minimal benefits in terms of light and shade are outweighed by both the pilot's costs of at least $7,500 per shelter and $200,000 for the full program (which was funded by a private grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation).*
this is what they're holding a press conference to celebrate
this has to be a joke. LA is unreal. https://t.co/prB6FCUSjO pic.twitter.com/CSd2CrFGTx
— sam (@sam_d_1995) May 21, 2023
For the last 12 years, Blue America has been in total control of California.
What is their greatest accomplishment in the field of public infrastructure?
1) Solar powered metal pole
2) Toilet paper ribbon cutting
3) Crack smoking billboard
4) $300M bus lane pic.twitter.com/K9id6qaK7W— Balaji (@balajis) May 20, 2023
Who says America can't build anything? Yes it was expensive, but our nonprofits managed to build this one-foot-long bus stop roof with holes in the top! https://t.co/d0pTrDVCRJ
— Noah Smith ???????????????????? (@Noahpinion) May 19, 2023
The fact that there were more officials there to celebrate La Sombrita than could fit beneath it was an illustration of the out-of-proportion ratio of bureaucratic input to infrastructure output.
In response, both LADOT and Kounkuey Design Initiative (KDI)—the nonprofit that designed the shelter—argued that their paltry La Sombrita designs needed to be narrow in order to slide through the cracks of the bureaucratic process that prevents the construction of larger, more adequate structures.
Anything that touched the sidewalk or was wide enough to actually shade people required input from many additional government departments.
"Typical bus shelters often cost $50k or more and require coordination among 8 departments. La Sombrita (in its most expensive, prototype form) costs approximately 15% of the price of a typical bus shelter and can be installed in 30 minutes or less," wrote KDI on Twitter.
Typical bus shelters often cost $50k or more and require coordination among 8 departments. La Sombrita (in its most expensive, prototype form) costs approximately 15% of the price of a typical bus shelter and can be installed in 30 minutes or less.
— Kounkuey [KDI] (@Kounkuey) May 20, 2023
A number of bloggers have waved away these excuses from LADOT and KDI while nevertheless agreeing that factors creating these inadequate shade structures are, well, structural.
Public agencies fail to coordinate with each other and have become too reliant on nonprofits and consultants to get anything done. Too many departments, stakeholders, and layers of government have a say in new projects, which slows things down even more.
What is needed then is deeper structural reforms that will shore up "state capacity" by streamlining processes, centralizing decision making, making greater use of off-the-shelf designs, widening sidewalks to create more space for shelters, and more.
Some of these are good ideas. They're all hard to implement.
Layers of process and inefficiency persist because interest groups, whether that's individual politicians, bureaucratic agencies, or nongovernmental contractors and consultants, benefit from them. Being able to say "no" is a valuable commodity that no one wants to give up for free.
The day after LADOT celebrated La Sombrita, California Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed a series of reforms to California's environmental review law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which strangles both public and private projects in red tape.
CEQA's problems are well-known and widely acknowledged. A number of reforms have been passed over the years to streamline its procedures or sweep whole project categories out of its purview, all with limited success.
Reform is an uphill battle.
Recognizing the difficulty of the sweeping change necessary to produce reasonably shady bus shelters, some transit advocates have offered a quasi-defense of La Sombrita: It's the best we can hope for in the short run.
"The Sombrita project tries to find a constructive niche in a highly inequitable L.A. already suffering from severe disparities. It tries to navigate the byzantine street furniture allocation mechanisms hamstrung by having tied transit shelters to advertising revenue," wrote Streetsblog's Joe Linton in an otherwise critical post.
Is La Sombrita the right solution? Maybe. Follow the local debate if you're curious. I'm just insisting on the principle of doing sensible, cheap, short-term things to reduce suffering in the city as it is, even as we fight to create the city that should be. 11/11
— Jarrett Walker (@humantransit) May 22, 2023
The problem is that the La Sombrita shelters, even as a marginal solution, are laughably inadequate. It's hard to see how they improve on a bad status quo at all.
Instead of relying on these quick fixes or waiting for the political system to reform itself, perhaps Los Angeles bus riders should take individual initiative and provide their own shelter and light.
On Amazon, one can purchase a baseball cap with a built-in light for only $17. For the price of one La Sombrita, 441 people could carry the same amount of shade and light with them to any bus stop in the city. For the price of the entire pilot program, nearly 12,000 people could have this ability. Getting one to the 157,360 people who commuted via transit in Los Angeles County in 2021 would cost $3 million. That's pretty pricey, but less than the expense of installing La Sombritas at even a fraction of the county's 12,000 bus shelters.
Finding individual solutions to state failures works for far more complex and dicey issues than shade. The inadequacies of public safety services lead businesses to hire security guards and individuals to carry guns. The inadequacies of public education lead many parents to homeschool.
Maybe it's not fair to ask bus riders to shade themselves when municipal governments and transit officials should be competent enough to provide shade for them. On the other hand, perhaps we've become too reliant on public agencies to provide collective solutions that could easily be solved by individuals.
In his 1888 book Looking Backward, socialist writer Edward Bellamy envisioned a world where the individual responsibility to carry one's own umbrella would be replaced by municipal sidewalk awnings that would extend any time it starts raining.
This sounds like a silly and impractical solution, even if a highly competent state were to try and implement it. We don't have that competent, utopian state now.
Instead of trying to turn L.A.'s government into that highly competent utopian state, transit riders should engage in some tactical urbanism and just buy a hat. Reforming an incompetent state can be a good idea. Given what a tall order that is, perhaps we can just find solutions that allow us to rely on it less.
UPDATE: This article has been updated to note that the La Sombrita pilot was funded by a private grant. A spokesman for the Los Angeles Department of Transportation sent Reason this statement after publication:
"We are committed to making it easier and safer for people to get to where they need to go in LA and testing all possible solutions that help us get there. La Sombrita—entirely grant-funded at no cost to the taxpayer—is not a replacement for critical investments we need more of like bus shelters and street lights. This pilot treatment is designed to test ways of creating small amounts of shade and light where other solutions are not immediately possible. Clearly, folks are ready to talk about this topic, and that has given us tons of feedback that we'll use to inform this and future initiatives."
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No wonder mass transit is so popular. So many exciting innovations.
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.
.
Just Open This Website……………..>>> http://www.works75.com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
I can't wait to use this the next time I'm in LA. I hope that I don't have to wait in line.
I essentially make about $7,000-$8,000 every month on the web. It’s sufficient to serenely supplant my old employments pay, particularly considering I just work around 10-13 hours every week from home. I was stunned how simple it was after I attempted it duplicate underneath web………..:) AND GOOD LUCK.:)
.
.
.
Apply Now Here————————————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
I refuse to read the criticisms of spending and cronyism/corruption from anyone named "Smith" with a Ukrainian flag in their bio.
That blue checkmark means nothing to you?
Elon is 15/167,000,000,000ths richer.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Sort of reminds me of the Stonehenge monolith in Spinal Tap. Funny too, that they held a celebratory press conference for this. They could've just hoped no one noticed. At least they owned it, I guess.
Isn’t it wonderful to extort money from taxpayers to provide no benefit?
And these kind of people want to run our health care. And schools. And everything else.
LOL!
Hey Britches, wait'll you see how much they spent on homelessness mitigation!
Learn to weld.
20+ years ago, after losing a Dot-Bomb job. 😀
There is something very post-modern IT about using an anonymous internal IM app to complain about the poor decision-making that caused layoffs as the result of hiring sprees.
> In his 1888 book Looking Backward, socialist writer Edward Bellamy envisioned a world where the individual responsibility to carry one's own umbrella would be replaced by municipal sidewalk awnings that would extend any time it starts raining.
That... kinda says it all.
Bellamy certainly won the debate on the individual responsibility front. We exorcised that from society, but we didn't get the auto-extending awnings.
If it involves solar in any way, liberals can't do it right.
Just when you think you've reached peak retard...
Can’t be done.
If you supplied your own baseball cap, the city would ban baseball caps on the grounds that not everybody can afford one and it would be racist to allow them. Except for the city-owned baseball cap rental kiosks where you could rent a baseball cap for a couple of bucks to be turned in when you boarded the bus. The baseball caps would be wi-fi enabled with a solar panel on top, embroidered with the LGBTQ2S+ flag, a beeper and a flashing light so that blind and deaf people could enjoy them as well and cost $8700 each.
You jest, but during the height of the pandemic, when the Orange County, CA Board of Supervisors rescinded the order to close golf courses, the mayor of Costa Mesa ordered that a private course remain closed (which was within her authority) because the public course wasn’t ready to remain open. It would be unfair for owners of the private course to be able to play when others couldn’t. When I read that in the new, I emailed her. She confirmed the “logic.”
The most terrifying part of that story is that by comparison to the rest of the state, OC was one of the most rational areas about their handling of a lot of the bigger issues (and that's coming from someone who deliberately got a 310 area code on my mobile when I moved back to Huntington Beach from out of state so I could at least pretend I didn't actually live south of the "Orange Curtain"). At the same point in time when OC was allowing movie theaters to re-open, L.A. County was filling in skate parks and plowing up berms on the beaches to prevent people from trying to bring their own nets to play volleyball.
There's a bit of irony in it being centered around golf courses, which were one of the facilities which really never should have been closed in the first place, and shouldn't have required any special modifications to be "ready" to re-open.
Any policy which had actually been "rooted in science" would never have closed outdoor spaces to the public as a precaution to stop the spread of a respiratory virus. Prior to 2019, 99% of the world's virologists and epidemiologists would have told anyone who asked that respiratory infections are virtually impossible to spread in an outdoor setting (especially in a sunny/breezy setting like any spot on the CA coast from Monterrey south), there was a stretch from 2020-2022 when any credentialed doctor saying the same would find themselves quickly silenced for contradicting "science" and its earthy avatar St Fauci, though. If that weren't enough proof, the data out of Wuhan (published by WHO, which at the time was the measure against which "misinformation" was being identified) showed virtually zero outdoor transmission but again citing that (or the data published on the CDC website) when either was in direct conflict to whatever nonsense Walensky and Fauci were pushing at the time would also be shut down as an attempt to "kill grannies" by the thousands; not that anyone was really acknowledging that younger patients weren't generally in any significant danger from the virus even as the median age of "covid deaths" continued to rise from its early level of around 75 years.
"The fact that there were more officials there to celebrate La Sombrita than could fit beneath it "
Spin mode, activate: This project was such a popular success! Look how many people showed up to the unveiling!
I mean, it's a pretty low bar considering about 1 person could be shaded under there.
Or zero if the sun was at the wrong angle. They do know the sun changes position in the sky, right?
Looks like it's specifically designed to cast the least amout of shads in the hottest part of the day. The news coverage claims that
at the right time of day" it can shade the entire bench, but that would have to be around either sunrise or sunset, and only at stops on streets where this Festivus pole could be properly oriented relative to the bench (knowing L.A. Metro, they probably installed at least 2 of the 4 on the north side of the benches so the bench would never be shaded by the "device"). At noon and in the early afternoon, any vertically oriented "shade" device would cast almost no meaningful shadow at all. Not only does the sun change positions, but the position of the sun has a direct and well known correlation to the general temperature and how much cooler someone can feel under cover vs under direct sunlight.
What kind of "safety" or "equity" is served by the installation of an object that's in the least potentially useful orientation.
In the Twitter post image, not even one of those lard asses could get shaded by it.
Most of them were likely paid to be there as part of their jobs (press covering the "event" and the politicians and NGO reps patting themselves on the back).
This has to be a Parks and Recreation episode and not real life.
The City Government announcing that a patently useless "device" is the best they could do without running into considerable government-imposed obstacles would have Ron Swanson turning cartwheels and gloating openly at the presser announcing it.
I thought the sidewalk-length awning was the least silly thing in Looking Backward. In fact I thought it was quite cool. But it didn't seem to work for street crossings without some fancy architecture: some collapsible, extendable thing at the corner that would function as a drawbridge to let trucks and buses thru. Still, being able to get around the block and stay dry seemed like a great thing.
The other un-silly thing was cable audio. So un-silly that we have that now. And everybody but the infirm ate out all the time!
Still, being able to get around the block and stay dry seemed like a great thing.
*leaves umbrella in closet as we prepare to go for a walk around the block*
Umbrellas have the defect Bellamy pointed out: People tend to poke each other with them in a crowd.
Awnings will be vandalized. "We can't have anything nice." is the rule of the day. Once something nice gets installed be it a $7500 single-person shade device or magical awning or rental bikes, it will be vandalized generally beyond the point where it is functional.
It would be nice if the writers of Reason would get with the times. Make a QR-code with the link to this article and attach it (or have it printed on) an umbrella or three. Now send it to Los Angeles officials. Use one of those $5 ones that are jacked up to $15 on a rainy day at the stores that are closing in the SF Bay area because of the theft/stench.
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.
.
Just Open This Website……………..>>> http://www.works75.com
This is one of those times when you ponder if the government are masterful trolls; only to realize that ... no, they are completely serious and dumb as a sack of rocks.
LA _had_ perfectly good shelters 25 years ago that not only protected from the sun, but wind and rain also. Then they spent a lot of money removing them (and in some cases replacing them with decorative structures that had no utility as shelters).
I believe that is even less effective than the bus stop near me. It consists of a sign that, from the back, could easily be mistaken for a no parking sign.
Wonder if we can get a few of these to be fucking useless for the four people waiting to ride our fucking useless (but extremely expensive) and unused streetcars.
We’ve had it so good in this country that a bullshit makework proposal project landed $200k of taxpayer money to create a shade artwork that neither is artwork nor shade at $7500 plus whatever it took to pay the con-artists to design it, build it, and install it and to solve what again? It would have been cheaper to give people a voucher to by an umbrella for shade. Government is an abysmal black hole of waste and stupidity. Why are we funding this bullshit? The illusion that taxes keep society moving is a fundamental lie and this doesn’t help erase that case.
This is such a scanda! So much bigger than 10s of millions of dollars from foreign bad actors being laundered thru 20 shell companies for a corrupt politicians family
Pointing out one wrong does not mean that other wrongs get a "pass". We can complain about more than one thing at a time. Cheers.
You could buy every Angelino a baseball cap, but most of them don't know that the bill of the cap goes in front, so pfffft....
Last time I checked, this is 2023. These bus stop posts (I could never call it a shade or shelter) should or at least could offer:
- Cell phone charging outlets.
- Wi-Fi connectivity.
- Emergency call box, such as a cell phone capable of dialing 911.
- Emergency audible panic alarm and flashing light with automatic notification to police.
- Ability to provide a bus information via both display and audio, including routes, schedules, modifications, service disruptions and emergency announcements.
This sounds like a long wish list, but for the price they are paying it shouldn’t cost much more. Wiring would not be needed because everything can function via cell networks and run on solar power.
It would work for about 2 days before vandals destroyed the screen, the chargers, and hackers co-opted the wifi to hack the phones of every passerby.
Agree 100%. But they are spending all their revenues on stuff which they are incompetent at - setting the schedule, route, buy the overly large buses to stop every single block on a route with no destination traffic (but tons of cars), hire drivers, etc.
So instead they are left with dressing up a pole.
Earning money online is very easy nowdays. Eanrs every month online more than$17k by doing very easy home based job in part time. Last month i have made$19754 from this job just in my spare time which is only 2 hrs a day. Very easywork to do and earning from this are awesome. Everybody can get this right nowand start earning cash online by follow instructions on thiswebpage………….
SITE. ——>>> newdollar.com
Why do all the press releases mention gender?
WTAF is going on here?
Recognizing the difficulty of the sweeping change necessary to produce reasonably shady bus shelters, some transit advocates have offered a quasi-defense of La Sombrita: It's the best we can hope for in the short run.
It is not the best we can hope for in the short run. It is evidence that public transit is completely fucked up. Designing/maintaining stops, shelters, depots, stations should be the PRIMARY function of public transit.
Those (the locations, time slots, etc) are what should be leased out by the muni to PRIVATE operators who would then be responsible for setting/collecting fares, schedules, routes, buying transport equipment, hiring drivers, etc. Akin to the airlines at the airport.
The muni landowner would be responsible for building/maintaining those slot spaces and combining all the different info into an accessible schedule. Akin to the airport itself.
If they can't design a real bus stop, it's because they are wasting ungodly amounts of money on their prime incompetence - operating the transit - and have nothing left. I suppose this design is better than just a pole - but the result of the misbegotten focus is that people will start clamoring for FEWER bus stops.
It's actually quite similar to the way we destroyed the post office. Focused on delivery rather than the actual post office facility. So we got rid of the post offices, have no idea what those are even for anymore, and spend tons on delivery (that used to be either nonexistent, privately arranged, or contracted by the local postmaster).
No, I don't want government agencies to become more efficient. I do not want them to cooperate more or streamline their processes! I want to give them much less to do and reduce the number of government agencies to two or three instead of thousands upon thousands upon thou ...
That strategy ain't working out is it.
Considered as an art project, it is merely uninspiring rather than a complete failure.
I quit working at shop and now I make 65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new after 4 years it was so hard. Here’s what I do http://www.topearn7.com