Even Kindergartners Should Be Allowed To Walk To School: Study
A new report finds that "most children benefit from some degree of independence by the time they are 5–6 years old."

Child protection laws and policies that determine at what age kids can do things on their own are often misaligned with actual child development—and grossly underestimate kids' capabilities—according to a new paper in Social Policy Report.
A country that investigates or arrests parents who let their kids walk the dog at age 8, or go to the donut store at 7 and 9, or wait in the car at age 11, is at odds with biological, psychological, and cross-cultural evidence showing just how competent kids are. This misapprehension is reflected in our child neglect laws. One in three U.S. kids will be reported to child protective services at some point in their childhood, usually for alleged neglect.
The paper's authors are Rachel Flynn, Nicholas Shaman, and Diane Redleaf; Flynn and Shaman are psychology professors, and Redleaf is a civil rights attorney who works with Let Grow, my nonprofit. They reviewed child development research and ethnographic studies to determine the age at which kids are objectively ready for some "healthy childhood independence."
There is no exact age that covers every kid in every situation, of course. But in general, the authors found that "children's roles and responsibilities in their social setting often undergo a qualitative shift around 5–7 years old." In fact, in many communities, "children as young as 5 years old take responsibility for caring for younger children."
Meanwhile, here in the U.S., Melissa Henderson was arrested for letting her 14-year-old babysit.
The authors used walking to school as the quintessential activity to illustrate each facet of child development. From a physical perspective, they report, most kids ages 6 and 7 have all the skills needed to walk or ride to school. (Having walked to kindergarten, I'd say that kicks in even sooner.)
Cognitively, kids know how to listen and respond appropriately by age 4. By 4 or 5, they can understand what a map represents.
By 5, children are also ready to start their formal education, which requires the ability to "wait rather than immediately act on their impulses, remember what they are told, interact reasonably well with others, and control themselves most of the time." Those are the same social and emotional skills needed for a walk to school.
In short: "Most children benefit from some degree of independence by the time they are 5–6 years old."
And yet, here in the U.S., many schools will not let kids get dropped off at the bus stop, even a few houses from where they live unless an adult is there to accompany them home. These rules can cover kids through ages 8 or 9. Many libraries don't allow school-aged kids to browse alone. County guidelines across northern Virginia say no child under age 9 should ever be unsupervised, even in their own yard.
Sanity is prevailing, however. Virginia just became the fifth state to pass Let Grow's "Reasonable Childhood Independence" law, which says that neglect occurs when parents put their children in obvious, serious danger—not any time they take their eyes off them.
Unfortunately, the Social Policy Report paper found "the overwhelming majority of states" still have laws and policies that treat unsupervised kids as automatically neglected.
Competence doesn't magically kick in at a certain age. It grows with experience. By forcing kids to be chaperoned while walking home from school until age 9, 10, or even 11, kids aren't getting the chance to develop responsibility, autonomy, and problem-solving skills.
That's why the paper calls on states and localities to "remove language in laws and policies that set age limits for independent activities." Moreover, states should use "scientific knowledge rather than presumptions" to decide if kids are ready for some unsupervised activities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
.. remove language in laws and policies that set age limits for independent activities.
Like cutting off genitalia.
That's different.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
I'm neither a doctor, nor a lawyer, nor a 5-yr.-old, but I'm pretty sure independently cutting off (human) genitalia is illegal regardless of age.
You'd be surprised what they allow in Commiefornia.
Finally, my paycheck is $ 8,500 A working 10 hours per week online. My brother’s friend had an average of 12K for several months, he work about 22 hours a week. I can not believe how easy it is, once I try to do so. This is what I do....
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Give it a fucking rest already. This kind of obsession isn't healthy.
"child neglect laws" are passed to control parents, not protect children.
That's why the paper calls on states and localities to "remove language in laws and policies that set age limits for independent activities." Moreover, states should use "scientific knowledge rather than presumptions" to decide if kids are ready for some unsupervised activities.
Or maybe someone can spend one nanosecond standing AT the school in the morning when the kids arrive. What is the biggest threat there? Can kids who are walking/riding handle that threat?
Answer: The biggest threat BY FAR is distracted hurried parents dropping their kids off. From an SUV that is so fucking huge and visibility-killing that parents often run over their own kid in their own driveway. Where parents themselves don't let kids cross on the crosswalk or stop at stop sign because they are not paying attention and forcing them off the road. There is a reason that CROSSING GUARD is the second most dangerous job (tree/loggers are first - roofers are third) in the US - though admittedly that is more because of flaggers/etc not schools. But still - kids are not old enough to safely 'deal with' shitty distracted angry drivers in traffic and in SUV's with poor visibility.
Until localities are ready to make the decision favoring kids rather than cars - then kids ain't gonna be walking/riding to school anytime soon. And we made that decision decades ago. Roughly around the time of right-on-red and the transition from station wagons to vans/SUV's.
Here's a video of a primary school in an industrial part of Amsterdam.
The only 'law' is that there is no car pullover/stopping allowed within one block of the school. So all the kids ARE going to have to walk a bit at least and the vehicular congestion is pushed well away from the crowd of kids.
Not all kids can bike on their own yet (bike classes in school start at age 7) - and some parents want to take their kids to school - but they do so by biking or walking. Which means everyone knows what the next step towards independence is - and it starts at age 7 rather than age 16.
Beyond the school itself - including rural areas - kids are able to practice biking - from anywhere, to anywhere, without armor, and with a large group of peers/kids keeping 'eyes on the street' (A Jane Jacobs term). With practice - like my parents did with me re looking both ways on a crosswalk (which doesn't work anymore since drivers now 'take' the crosswalk from peds) - the kids very soon become independent. Which is why 70% of Dutch kids bike/walk to school on their own by age 9. More similar to what USED TO happen in the US when we were kids - and not at all similar to the 5% or so that happens now
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart ......
SITE. ——>>> bitecoin.com
Just to consider one road engineering decision that would calm traffic congestion around schools without doing something ‘extreme’ like prohibiting car drop-offs within a block or putting up speed limit signs that will get ignored.
Elevate the crosswalks around a school – say within two blocks or so – to sidewalk level rather than lowering them to street level. That forces traffic to slow down to deal with the ‘bump’. The very act of slowing down will encourage drivers to actually look for peds – and once they are slowing they will be more inclined to yield to a ped rather than intimidate the ped into yielding to them because they are bigger and in a rush. Around schools, that ped is more likely to be a kid.
Road engineering works so much better than paint and signs and lights. But it also requires higher attendance at the various ‘transportation and street planning committees’ so that the car-preference default is not just automatic by bureaucrats. One might imagine that a political party focused on how to deal with local issues might be good at that.
From an SUV that is so fucking huge and visibility-killing that parents often run over their own kid in their own driveway.
The type of car is largely immaterial. Large Vehicles make up 60-70% of backover deaths but they make up something like 60-70% of the market. Further, year-to-year variance of backover deaths in no way correlates with SUV or “large vehicle” sales and, especially notable, backup cameras were required in 2018, but the last pre-COVID numbers showed an *increase* in the number of backovers.
The vehicle doesn’t help, but the problem isn’t the vehicle or lack of visibility, it’s the operator not looking.
Edit: And I'd argue that programs like kidsandcars.org are just advertisements for backup cameras that do more harm than good. Frequently showing a pile of kids that "can't be seen" from an SUV without showing if the mirrors are adjusted properly or, if they do, clearly showing the mirrors adjusted (improperly) specifically so that nothing below the fender is visible in the mirror.
"parents who let their kids walk the dog at age 8, or go to the donut store at 7 and 9, or wait in the car at age 11"
You mean parents who let their kids go out alone to walk the dog, grab a doughnut etc UNARMED, without so much as a knife, a roll of piano wire, or some brass knuckles, let alone a loaded revolver to protect themselves from the legions of pedophile groomers who wander our streets in search of prey. If a kid is old enough to walk a dog, s/he is old enough to be entrusted with the means of self protection.
^trueman proves once again to be an ignoramus;
mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
"Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."
My kids could easily walk to school, we live inside 2 miles of it. But I will not let them. Because pedestrian fatalities are at an all time high with distracted and/or angry aggressive drivers speeding on side streets and main drags alike. In order to walk they would need to cross a "route" meaning a rural two lane highway. The intersection has a Cross walk but literally every day I watch reckless drivers blow through red lights because they sped up to get through but timed it poorly. In my vehicle I won't proceed into the intersection until I have visual confirmation that vehicles are slowing down rather than speeding up. It's insane. I live in a quiet semi rural suburb, if I can't justify allowing my kids to walk due to unsafe conditions for pedestrians then I can imagine a lot of people making the same calculations.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart ......
SITE. ——>>> bitecoin.com
That's your right as a parent. But don't complain when your kids are 18, legally adults, but still acting like 9 year olds. You didn't let them grow up, so good luck getting them out of the house.
It’s a very rational fear – and obviously an overwhelmingly prevalent reality now. The US is one of the most unsafe countries for pedestrians outside the Third World. The way we ‘reduced’ pedestrian fatalities until about 2010 or so was – by reducing the number of people who walk anywhere. Which is why Americans walk an average of 400 yards per day (even if I’m sure it’s more than that to the garage and from parking lot to store/office). Which is also why Americans are obese now and CAN’T walk. From 2010 on, there was no more ability to lower the number of people who walk and the miles they walk – so ped fatalities have doubled since then. And it is no accident that ped accidents rose by 30% during 2020 alone – when there was LESS traffic (though at much higher speed) and more peds. The 'safer' the rider inside the vehicle cage, the more unsafe the human outside the cage.
Road safety is not a decision made in an individual context. We – collectively – chose to make roads deadly for those outside a vehicle. This is the consequence of that. One parent alone cannot change that context.
You have the right to parent as you choose, and that is fine. You also just admitted you are endangering your child by driving on a rural road with aggressive speeding drivers that run red lights! You should be arrested for child endangerment. (not really, but I was trying to make a point).
Nope, the woke white millennial suburban soccer mommies fear a stiff breeze. People are dying.
We've heard about 70 to 90% of professors are liberal; most journalists lean left. Now do the same analysis for those running these children protection agencies and those who call the police.
You are absolutely correct. Liberal people run the schools, media, and sometimes the courts. However, they would have no power if the laws continue to be vague! Whoever gets arrested for letting their kid walk home alone would eventually face a cop on trial who would say things like "he could've been trafficked, kidnapped, etc." You or your lawyer, needs to only ask him 2 questions-- 1.) so you're saying I should've prevented those accidents from happening if I had driven him home instead of walking home instead? (cop will answer in the affirmative). 2.) What happened if I got into a car accident on the way home? Would driving home also be considered endangerment then? Case closed.
That's all very good and well and even true and right, however, it doesn't matter. Human beings are a slave race of vermin bent on exterminating themselves by all manner of horseshit, such as criminalizing normal childhood independence. Humans do not deserve freedom, independence, development, prosperity, liberty, or any form of healthy well-roundedness, since they constantly beg their masters to govern them harder. Ban everything once and for all and see if people take it or not, I say. If we do, we deserve it.
Oh, wait. We already did ban everything and people did take it. #Covid. Carry on with the panracial global holocaust, and kill this piddly human cancer on the universe. Or at least try, and see what happens. Hopefully I'm wrong, but we'd better find out soon.
"people did take it # Covid."
No, I did not. I did NOT take it.
I did not wear a mask, in Los Angeles, in California. Not on bus, not on a subway, not on a plane, not in the grocery stores. Kicked off of many, started fights with many, but I did NOT wear one.
I did not get a COVID fake vaccine shot, and neither did my kids (which actually would be child endangerment). They almost got kicked out of school, they are barred from applying to their dream college UCLA, I got booted from my job, but guess what, I found another one. One thing I didn't do-- I did NOT get a shot!
All freedom lovers, all libertarians, need to stiffen your resolve. No means no.
Wow, what an invincibly ignorant self-righteous asshole. Just another reminder that no political label has a monopoly on those.
I like you. More people should think like you and fight back. --Mike Tang
As a kindergartner I walked to school. Granted, school was only three blocks away, but I still walked to kindergarten every single day. Even when it was raining. It wasn't until first grade that I realized there was a *front* entrance to the school. Gosh.
Today, over fifty years later, the front entrance is a solid mass of rushing cars dropping off kids. In a district that is less than one mile in radius.
For some places walking doesn't make sense. If I lived in downtown LA I would not want my kid walking to kindergarten. But in rural/suburban America, why not? Get the tykes some exercise!
Why as America become so fragile? It's not the Democrats because those giant middle class soccer SUVs know no political boundaries. Both sides freak when suggested that they don't have to helicopter over their children 24/7. Parents getting arrested for letting kids walk by themselves knows no color boundaries. One example listed in the story above was from Waco, Texas. As in Red-on-Red Red Party. So yeah, its' both sides. It's not a political problem, it's a cultural problem. It's not wokism, it's fragilism.
Not saying we should let kids play with lawn darts, but Jeepers Cripes on a Pogo Stick, it's fine if they walk by themselves.
Do you know WHEN pedestrian fatalities in the US started to decline?
Roughly 1985-1990 - when 'stranger danger' was the big thing scaring parents of millennials. Before that - ped fatalities (and even more so injuries) had been rising with the prevalence of the car - more so in suburbs than urbs. Esp when 'right-on-red' became legal everywhere (early 80's). So what changed the trend? That is absolutely when parents started chaperoning their kids everywhere for their entire childhood to produce a generation of snowflakes.
Was it purely 'fear' of kidnapping. Well - yes and no. I was around then and an adult - almost a parent. The common meme to those stranger danger stories was - a van. The bad guy would have a van (a light truck chassis) - not a station wagon (a car chassis). Vans being associated with hippies, drugs, orgies in the 60's - well easy to see how those morph into child kidnappers by the 1980's. Station wagons associated with parents, wood paneling, car pools - were - by 1985 - not able to be produced anymore because of CAFE standards. Vans WERE in fact more prevalent in the early 80's as the first replacement for station wagons in the post-CAFE era. Which meant they were more prevalent in all them burbs with a new millennial boom. So hey - stranger danger. Maybe those vans weren't the local parent hauling their kids around but were the local predator.
At any rate that is exactly when kids started getting hauled around everywhere. When ped fatalities started declining because of the reduction in pedestrians. The word soccer mom first appeared in 1982 but was only prevalent by 1992. The demand by new parents for something to replace the 'van' and all its 60's baggage is what resulted in the SUV (light truck chassis - with far worse danger to any ped who chooses to ped).
Just because YOU walked to kindergarten - before the mid-80's - doesn't mean that's the same world for kids walking today.
Roughly 1985-1990 – when ‘stranger danger’ was the big thing scaring parents of millennials.
...
The bad guy would have a van (a light truck chassis) – not a station wagon (a car chassis).
...
Station wagons associated with parents, wood paneling, car pools – were – by 1985 – not able to be produced anymore because of CAFE standards.
Did you wear an onion on your belt too Grandpa? You're all over the map. As you indicate, vans weren't unheard of in the 60s, CAFE standards were the 70s, stranger danger started in the early 80s, millennials watched Clark Griswold drive his family to Wally World, around Europe and to get a Christmas tree from '83 to '89 in trusted family station wagons. Station wagons weren't displaced by cargo and (cargo) conversion vans, they were replaced by minivans beginning in the mid-late 80s.
You're snatching at factoids to support your narrative. Parents of millennials were walking their kids to school because Fuel Efficiency standards made lighter car chassis inaccessible and people were scared of hippies? WTF?
Station wagons weren’t displaced by cargo and (cargo) conversion vans, they were replaced by minivans beginning in the mid-late 80s.
You are admitting exactly what I said. ‘Minivans’ were built on a light truck chassis (CAFE required average – 20 mpg in 1984) – same as cargo/utility vans, ambulances, and pickup trucks – and unlike station wagons (CAFE required average – 27 mpg in 1984). They were called ‘minivans’ because of the HEIGHT – under 6 feet. They could fit into a standard residential garage door opening. Otherwise, they were no different, by CAFE, than the VW hippie ‘bus’. All manufacturers started them as the new standard ‘family car’ from 1984 to 1987 starting with Chrysler in Nov 1983.
BTW – Clark Griswold was – July 1983. The last laugh for station wagons.
And ‘stranger danger’ can be dated to 1984 – when NCMEC was founded.
Oh – and guess when states started legislating to kill biking for kids – 1987 – when states started requiring armor and helmets for kids. Further driving parents into strapping their kids into the vehicle cage instead.
IDK how old you are – but anyone who was an adult then understands the massive cultural/behavioral shift that occurred in just a few years. If they just pay a modicum of attention. From the latchkey kids of GenX who hung out unsupervised at the mall. To the millennial snowflakes whose soccer mom drove them everywhere and whose parents continually ramped up the fearmongering about how they should ‘parent’.
I'm no fan of CAFE, but it didn't kill station wagons. Changing tastes did.
"...Just because YOU walked to kindergarten – before the mid-80’s – doesn’t mean that’s the same world for kids walking today..."
JFree, the chicken little, peddling PANIC wherever he can!
See here:
https://momtechblog.com/are-children-less-safe-today-than-when-we-were-growing-up
(but don't tell JFree; he'll just have to go searching for something else over which to PANIC !!!)
When I was visiting Japan my lodging in Tokyo was close to a school and in the morning, as I walked, I would see the children walking to school. I also noted that on the corners there were groups of older people, the grand parent class, that would monitor the street corners. I assumed they were not paid but did this as their contribution to community. This struck me as a very good system. The children have the independence to walk on their own but adult eyes on the street should problems occur.
Not only do kids in Japan walk to school, it's routine to send even very young children on minor errands on their own. Many Japanese parents wouldn't think twice about sending a 5yo to fetch a few items from a nearby store, only limiting it to things the kid is physically able to carry.
Lenore, I love that you are continuing your fight to free "parent slavery" to the State and got laws passed in a few states de-criminalizing free-range parenting. Please have more of these liberal "nanny states" like CA and NY pass similar laws.
To any parent who is arrested for non-danger free-range parenting--please do not take the easy way out, please do not plead guilty or take a "plea bargain" just to make it easy for yourself--you make it harder for everyone else as your cases will set a precedence for future arrests and trials.
I am Mike Tang, the dad from Corona, CA who has defied arrest for making my son walk home. I wrote "F U All on my arrest record." If push came to shove, I would use my 2nd Amendment rights to defend my kids from unjust kidnapping by cops and CPS. I have not done a day of my sentence and now the courts are afraid to touch me because I told them exactly how it will turn out--I will put them all on the front page news. It takes guts and vigilance and courage to do the right thing. Appeal to the State or Supreme Court. Child neglect and safety laws are unconstitutional, especially when many states already have more specific "curfew laws" that should apply over a vague and easily abused "neglect" or "endangerment" laws. Not only that, but kids have First Amendment rights to peacefully assemble (even alone) in public places--take it to the Supreme Court.
Don't be a slave, don't be a sheep. Stand with me, wherever you are, and FIGHT BACK NOW!! If they take your kid away, gather local supporters and storm the CPS and take your kid back by force. Gofundme's are good and might help you pay for a lawyer, but a lawyer doesn't guarantee a win! Better to go for the front page of the news, and the country will rally behind your ridiculous arrests and trials! You will notice that the parents who got front page coverage for their arrests had the cases eventually dropped while the ones that didn't get so much publicity (like mine) gone ahead to trial because they know we can be swept under the rug.
Don't be swept under the rug, go out with a bang! This is America, land of the brave, you'd be doing a huge favor for other suffering parents around the country. And your reward--no more jury duty summons--I automatically write "F.U. All" on those too, they stopped mailing me future jury duty summons, haha!
If you let young children walk to school the drug peddlers will give them marijuana laced with hard drugs to get them hooked for life. That's a fact.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here———————————————->>> http://Www.Coins71.Com