City Threatens Christian Group With Fines, Prosecution for Giving the Homeless Muffins, Coffee
The Department of Justice is now intervening on behalf of the Orange County, California, group's right to distribute food at its resource center in Santa Ana.
The U.S. Department of Justice is intervening on behalf of a Christian charitable group in Orange County that's been threatened with fines and even criminal penalties for using their property to hand out snacks and coffee to the homeless.
On Wednesday, the DOJ filed a "statement of interest" in a lawsuit filed by Micah's Way against the city of Santa Ana, California, arguing that the city's crackdown on their snack service violates federal laws protecting religious activity from discriminatory local land use regulations.
"The free exercise of religion is a bedrock principle of our nation," said U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada for the Central District of California in a press release. "Religious groups should be entitled to exercise their religion by providing charitable services based in their religious beliefs."
Since 2005, Micah's Way has operated a resource center where volunteers help connect their poor and homeless clients with birth certificates, ID cards, clothing, bus passes, and other services, according to a January complaint filed by the group. They also offer the people who come to the resource center muffins, pastries, and fruit, plus hot coffee.
Micah's Way claims their charitable activities continued without issue for over 15 years. Things changed in 2020 when the group moved its operations outside as a pandemic precaution. That same year, a needle exchange opened up two doors down.
The lawsuit claims that the influx of people using the needle exchange led to a number of "troublesome incidents," including trespassing, loitering, and drug use, and that Micah's Way was partially blamed due to "guilt by association." The incidents sparked complaints from neighbors, including Santa Ana's then-Mayor Vicente Sarmiento, who lived near the resource center, according to the complaint.
In November 2021, Micah's Way received an administrative citation from Santa Ana for not having a valid certificate of occupancy. The citation came despite the group having been a city-licensed nonprofit that often worked with city officials.
The citation demanded that the group obtain a certificate of occupancy at their resource center or else cease all operations there. When the group applied for the needed certificate, they were denied twice in January 2022 and June 2022 on the grounds that it was engaged in food distribution, which wasn't allowed by their property's "professional district" zoning.
A June letter from the city said that if Micah's Way continued operating its resource center without a certificate of occupancy, the city would take "all appropriate action" against the group, including "administrative fines, criminal prosecution and/or civil remedies such as injunctions and penalties."
Communications from the city to Micah's Way obtained by Voice of OC say that the group's feeding of the homeless had generated complaints from nearby residents about transients lingering in their neighborhood, discarding food waste in public, and scaring residents.
Micah's Way contends that the vast majority of neighbor complaints were the result of the needle exchange and that these complaints dropped off precipitously after the exchange moved in February 2022.
In an attempt to address any remaining concerns, the group also moved its operations back inside its building in the summer of 2022. It also agreed to only hand out food in connection with its other services.
This didn't placate the city.
In January 2023, the city refused to issue the group a certificate of occupancy unless Micah's Way also agreed to a number of nonnegotiable conditions, including that the group stop handing out any food at all at its resource center, stop food deliveries from the resource center, stop its outreach work to the homeless, and not advertise in public or private the availability of food and drink at its resource center.
In response, Micah's Way sued Santa Ana in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California later that month. Its lawsuit alleges that the city is violating the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).
The 2000 law bars local governments from enforcing land use regulations that "impose a substantial burden on religious exercise" without a compelling justification.
Micah's Way argues in its lawsuit that feeding the homeless is a core part of its religious mission with little impact on its neighbors. The city's demand that they stop distributing food imposes a substantial burden on their religious exercise without furthering any real government interest.
"[Micah's Way] has now been confronted with the binary choice between the following two unacceptable alternatives," reads the complaint. "Obtaining a [certificate of occupancy] for [its] Resource Center by agreeing to abandon their religious beliefs in providing food and drink to the needy or…remaining true to their religious beliefs and then facing potential fines and prosecution."
In March, Santa Ana filed a motion to dismiss Micah's Way lawsuit. The motion argues that the group's provision of snacks is a very small part of its overall activities. Therefore, the city's demand that the snack service stop isn't a serious enough burden to trigger RLUIPA.
"Simply providing small snack food items such as a 'cup of coffee and a muffin' to individuals that obtain other services at the Property is a minor activity," reads the city's motion to dismiss. "Any curtailment or limitation on such a minor activity is a mere inconvenience and cannot possibly be a 'substantial burden.'"
Micah's Way is hardly the only religious group to run afoul of local zoning codes.
The charitable missions of churches and nonprofits often don't neatly fit within zoning codes that sort all human activity into neat little boxes. Reason has covered a number of cases of churches in residential zones being told they can't operate a "commercial" soup kitchen and churches in commercial zones being told they can't operate a "residential" shelter.
The idea behind RLIUPA, which passed with wide bipartisan support in Congress, was to give religious groups added federal protection from overly restrictive zoning codes.
In 2018, the DOJ under President Donald Trump launched its Place to Worship Initiative to educate local governments about RLUIPA's legal protections and make it easier for religious organizations to file complaints of RLUIPA violations to the DOJ.
The department's "statement of interest" unequivocally rejects Santa Ana's argument that it's within the bounds of RLUIPA to demand Micah's Way stop handing out snacks.
The city's threats of "monetary and criminal consequences is not a 'mere inconvenience,'" it reads. "Rather, the City has inflicted 'substantial pressure' to compel [Micah's Way] to modify its behavior by ceasing to perform 'act[s] of charity in providing . . . food and beverage items to the poor and homeless persons.'"
It asks that the city's motion to dismiss the case be denied.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why should the rules be different for religious groups than they are for anyone else?
Excellent question! Which is why the zoning authorities have also investigated every office, retail outlet and other enterprise within this "professional district" and forcibly to shut down their lunch rooms, their coffee stations and donut plates... Oh, wait.
In fact, the city is the one enforcing different rules just because they are a religious group. And because petty municipal bullies have a documented history of such abuses, Congress stepped in and passed RLUIPA to stop them.
Religious groups don't pay taxes, right? I wonder how much of this is just trying to extract revenue, or force them out so someone who pays taxes will move in.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Charity is also part of their religious beliefs which are being infringed upon.
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tellme how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, itwas all true and has totally changed my life.last month my pay check was $13583just working on the laptop for a few hours.Simply go to this website and followinstructions to start earning....Have a good Day..
.
.
For more detail visit the given link...................➤➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
First of all, fuck Mormonism.
That said, these fucks need to stop enabling bad behavior by giving out handouts all the time. Maybe the religions could simply spend their tax exempt money (the Mormons have half a trillion in cash hoarded, start with them) on free housing and drugs and paraphernalia so we can get these decrepit zombies off our streets.
Otherwise, frankly, we don’t need either of them.
Santa Ana has a ton of conservatives and Christians, and conservative Christians. Southern California also has tons of auto dealerships that serve their customers donuts and muffins and coffee while they wait for their car to be serviced.
My guess is it’s the concentration of homeless people they are really going after, not having anything to do with the religious aspect, or concerns with the food itself being contaminated or something like that.
Southern California also has tons of auto dealerships that serve their customers donuts and muffins and coffee while they wait for their car to be serviced.
Just scratching my chin here... I wonder how long that dealership would continue serve donuts, coffee and muffins to those customers if they stopped paying and set up tents in the parking lot and pooped behind the dumpster?
Not long.
The mayor is a Democrat. The house rep is a Democrat. Southern California? This ain't San Diego, it's Los Angeles.
Have you spent time in Santa Ana, r did you just look up stuff about it on the Internet.
Lucy . you think George `s storry is impossible, on sunday I got a brand new Saab 99 Turbo after having made $8551 this past four weeks and just over ten-k last month . it's by-far the most comfortable job I have ever had . I started this five months/ago and almost straight away began to bring home over $95... per-hour..
🙂
AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
"Excellent question! Which is why the zoning authorities have also investigated every office, retail outlet and other enterprise within this “professional district” and forcibly to shut down their lunch rooms, their coffee stations and donut plates… Oh, wait."
And don't forget those pesky Baptists, Catholics, and Lutherans randomly handing our grape juice and cookies to just about anyone requesting it!!!
They shouldn't. But municipal governments shouldn't get to ignore the constitution just to get rid of the homeless either.
The real question is, why should anyone be subjected to these petty, asinine rules? It disgusts me how many people see someone wearing fewer chains and immediately demand more chains for the other guy instead of asking why they're wearing so many chains.
The city better get busy going after any place that hosts twelve-step programs and other support groups. They hand out coffee and muffins. Cookies too. Can't allow that.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, now I make over $15,000 per month (SW-01) just doing an easy j0b 0nline! I KNOW YOU MAKE MANY DOLLARS RIGHT NOW online from my $28,000, TS JOB EASY WORKING ONLINE…
Just copy and paste.............>>> http://www.works75.com
And their clientele is “addicts”! But maybe there are no such support groups in that city...now.
" . . . including trespassing, loitering, and drug use, and that Micah's Way was partially blamed due to "guilt by association."
Since there is a cop at every drug arrest, are the cops guilty as well?
Yes, but for different reasons.
Invitations have consequences.
Magic underwear could SAVE us all!!! From our own arrogance, hatreds, evils, shitty behavior, and EVERYTHING!!!
Let me guess.
The legal basis for the City's actions is some public health ordinance.
Wait were they giving them muffin stumps?
https://twitter.com/Partisan_O/status/1656748298441486347?t=PFPi6X2lRYf371KS-oLFCw&s=19
Do yourself a favor and read this follow-up on the Loudon County “Love Warriors”—a secret group of elected officials, political candidates, journalists, business leaders, and left-wing activists who conspired to destroy the lives of parents who challenged the local school board..
The article offers a rare glimpse into the inner-workings of this group, which not only targeted and harassed perceived enemies, but labored to protect fellow Democrats on the heels of a rape cover-up…
You’ll quickly recognize the lies, smears, and tactics used to silence and intimidate… because we are seeing similar campaigns against ordinary people at every level of government.
Like I said earlier, this episode in Loudon is truly the perfect vignette…
As you make your way through the piece, keep in mind that all this was happening at the same time Merrick Garland and the DOJ were investigating Loudon County parents.
Loudon County is a bellwether. Familiarize yourself with the players and the terrain, because if it hasn’t already, this same fight is coming to your neighborhood.
[Link]
this same fight is coming to your neighborhood
That's OK for me. Remember the meme:
"Don't fuck with old people. Life in prison is no deterrent."
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1656755986453938178?t=LJ7haVWK1wAemmoDYVB_6w&s=19
BREAKING: Marine Vet To Be Charged In Death of Jordan Neely: Report
I wonder what the evidence against him is.
The evidence is that Alvin Bragg is beholden to the militant left.
"I wonder what the evidence against him is."
He killed someone on camera, for no good reason. How he hasn't been charged with murder is quite beyond all normal people. There might be a case for use of minimal force in the situation in which the murder occurred; there was no excuse for killing a man.
Let's be honest, we all know it was a racist murder. You know it, which is why you're trying so hard to pretend it was something else. I know it, and I'm not scum, which is why I called it what it is.
The bit I don't get is how you can be so stupid that you don't realise that defending every bit of racism, however obvious, is counterproductive to your aim of defending racism. Sometimes, it is better to admit the really egregious stuff so you can go on defending the less obvious stuff without being a known racist scumbag whose opinion can be ignored.
Well, there's a dead guy for starters. Then there's the video recordings of him choking a guy who never directly threatened him, and continuing to choke the guy long after he was clearly subdued, even as other passengers warned him he was killing the guy.
Does he have a GoFundMe?
That would get shut down if he did.
There's GiveSendGo
""The U.S. Department of Justice is intervening on behalf of a Christian charitable group""
If I had a dollar for every time I saw that headline I would have a dollar.
Um, go broke, get woke. The Rainbow flag is now starting to fly in Churches in the west. The calculus is simple, if the Church follows the "right" policies, the Justice Department will intervene.
Can’t King Charles III decide these things now, and behead a few people on the losing side. If not, what the hell is he there for?
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1656664063047536648?t=Q3_bGor52XsguLWujfcjUg&s=19
You can burn a [American] flag but not this one?
America has a new state religion
- Homeless man charged with hate crimes for defecating on two LGBTQ+ Pride flags: NYPD
[Link]
Like I said earlier, if he just shit on the street they'd ignore him, and if he dumped a crucifix into a jar of piss they'd give him an arts grant and a spot in the National Gallery of Art.
Just shows that blasphemy is still an offense for the wokesters, but the gods are different.
The "hate crimes" enhancements are total bullshit, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be charged with something for defacing other people's property.
If a homeless person tanks up on Christian muffins and coffee, then defecates on my front steps, do I have a case against the church?
What would I have to do to prove liability?
I've got samples.
Just return the feces to the church. In the collection plate if possible.
No but you do have a case against the homeless person.
That’s OK. You want to sue the party with the deepest pockets.
No. You've got a case against the guy who crapped on your steps. The only way the church would be liable is if you could prove that they somehow caused him to specifically crap on your steps. Something like telling him, "We'll give you these muffins, but only if you promise to crap on Ezra's steps."
So how is this different than say, a group of Ishtar worshippers wanted to open a temple where they could practice sacred prostitution?
That would obviously be illegal in most places, even though Ishtar goes way back before Christianity.
(I mean, personally, I think both should be legal, but not because of the religious aspect of it)
There’s no homeless people in the Ishtar scenario (I assume, or those are some generous temple prostitutes).
The legal rationale is that prostitution is always inherently harmful, and therefore the state has a compelling interest in prohibiting it. Not saying I agree with that, just saying that's the difference.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, now I make over $15,000 per month (SW-01) just doing an easy j0b 0nline! I KNOW YOU MAKE MANY DOLLARS RIGHT NOW online from my $28,000, TS JOB EASY WORKING ONLINE…
Just copy and paste.............>>> http://www.works75.com
What you need to know to stay safe from COVID: Some things have changed
About the same number as killed in auto accidents.
"...It’s not a cause for jubilation, considering that the pandemic has claimed the lives of more than 1.1 million Americans..."
Really? Got any evidence?
Besides which, assholes like Newsom and Breed shut down whole industries for something claimed here to have caused <1/2 of % mortality.
Your school isn't teaching your kids to be trans, a third party brought INTO the school is doing it.
For those that are thinking of clicking through, very disturbing personal account. Absolutely chilling.
Diane, I watched that video.
It was of course a complete softball interview. If any journalist had given the same type of interview to any left-of-center activist you would have been beside yourself in rage about how corrupt and awful the media is.
I also found it suspicious that the mom did not identify any details about the sex ed curriculum or even the outside third party that taught that curriculum. This is important because she clearly places a lot of blame on that moment to when her daughter was exposed to ideas about transgenderism. But she did not provide any details for us to decide for ourselves (and of course the reporter did not press her for any details). Maybe the curriculum really is as bad as she claims it is. Or - and here is another very real possibility - maybe the curriculum is a convenient scapegoat for her and her self-admittedly poor parenting decision to let her daughter befriend some questionable peers, and perhaps the REAL source of her daughter's journey into transgenderism came more from peer pressure from her low-quality friends instead of from this sex-ed curriculum. But we will never know, will we?
I did a brief Google search of the mom, Erin Friday, and her group Our Duty, and I couldn't find anywhere where she permitted herself to give an interview to a hostile or even a neutral interviewer. They have all been complete softball ones like this one. To me this is a red flag that there is more to her story than what is being presented.
Furthermore, I've asked many times of commenters here like you who are upset with transgenderism, how they would deal with the situation of a teenager claiming to be transgender. And I get very very very few coherent answers. Mostly all I get is incoherent rage and spittle. But Ms. Friday here provides one example: she essentially punished her daughter for claiming to be trans. She took away her phone (not really a punishment per se, but still - she herself claimed her daughter viewed it as a type of punishment), she refused to even acknowledge the claim of transgenderism at all, she of course did not participate in 'preferred pronouns' (that goes without saying), she forbad her daughter from seeing her former friends, she would subject her daughter while on long car drives, as a captive audience, to anti-trans diatribes. She forced her daughter to adopt mom's idea of how a young woman should be. That is her example.
Do you support Ms. Friday's model of how to deal with a teen who claims to be trans? If not, how would you modify it?
Good lord you're evil.
We explained that we didn't agree. As a woman, I explained it was an insult to me for a teenage boy to think he knows what it feels like to be a woman. We do refuse to use the other name and the incorrect pronouns. As a female that likes wearing pants, I agreed that he could wear whatever he wanted to and have bought clothes designed for a female shape because I understand that wearing high heels doesn't make him a woman any more than me wearing my brother's hand me downs made me a man. We refused to pay for any hormone-altering drugs for a teenage kid that during a pandemic when he was removed from interacting with his friends decided he was transgender after heavy online interaction and encouragement. Now that he is 18 we continue to pay for college. We don't punish his younger sister for using the other name, but we still use his name. We tried to get him consoling but he only wanted to see someone that 100% supported him. Laws and the new counseling governing boards make it hard for any counselor to actually show doubt in his delusion. So instead my son attends video game tournaments in a sea of other guys and claims he is a woman because he feels like it.
Thank you for sharing.
As you know I'm loathe to watch videos, so I was just going to take Diane/Paul's word for it that some school in California hired a sex ed contractor who was pushing transgender idealogy. Despite some commenters' lies about me here, I've never denied that such things happen.
Sarc's comments spurred me to read a bit about what happened. It's a bit frustrating that none of the inverviews with Erin Friday seem to give such basic information as what school all this occurred at, or who the contractor was. The closest I got was finding one source that implies she lives in San Francisco.
If she does live in San Francisco, her daughter was going to subjected to a lot of transgender idealogy whether she got it at school or not.
Our family and a lot of others we knew when we lived in Silicon Valley signed up for an awesome sex ed course that was offered by Stanford Children's Hospital. A lot of commenters here might be thinking, "Oh, Stanford, I bet it was filled with transgender propoganda." It wasn't like that at all; they talked very little about homosexuality, leaving it to the family to talk about it with the kid, and they didn't talk about transgenderism at all.
I'll repeat what I've written about before at length. We used to live in Northern California, so we know a lot of hardcore progressive families, and we still keep in touch with them even though we have moved out of California.
What I am seeing is a lot of their pre-teen daughters identifying as "gender fluid". It is clearly a social trend among them. But none of them is asking for surgery or hormones, they are only doing things like dressing in androgynous clothes and changing their pronouns and asking to be called some ambiguous, "cool" name like "Blaze" or "Vibrance".
We only knew one boy who considered himself transgender when he was younger, and he, too, now says that he is gender fluid rather than still wanting to transition to being a girl. I think he may be taking puberty-suppressing hormones, though. Other than that one boy, other boys we know in the Bay Area seem to be uninterested in transgenderism or gender fluidity.
So, if you think of the transgender trend as a "social contagion", the good news is the contagion seems to be mutating into a weaker form even if it is more widespread. Think about it: how many kids out there are going to find the idea of undergoing genital surgery appealing? Not a lot.
"Following a lawsuit by Attractive Nuisance Ministries LLC...."
The Holy Bible, Team Red Version
Lo and behold, Jesus entered the city of Galilee, where he was beset by a throng of worshippers. Jesus prayed with them and told them to love their neighbors. But the Mayor of Galilee went to Jesus, and told him that his gospel was creating a Public Nuisance. Jesus agreed, and decided that he would only preach to worshippers if they were bathed, clean, and not poor. The destitute wretches were driven into the countryside, and Jesus and the Mayor smiled.
Totally Not A Leftist Apologist
The Mayor is Team Blue in this scenario, you gaslighting imbecile
If I were a "leftist apologist", don't you think I'd be defending the Team Blue mayor here? I think that is what's known as a 'self-own' by the kids nowadays
The. Self own is you said the Team Red Bible says that you only help poor people if they are clean. Team Blue is actually saying that here. I’m not sure how you get around this
Fuck you, Reason.
https://twitter.com/CCrowley100/status/1656808970084859905?t=uz_sKIX13ccAO92UWA031g&s=19
"Injustice results as much from treating unequals equally as from treating equals unequally."
— Aristotle, Politics
Daniel Penny, Jordan Neely and the American System of Injustice
Since the tumult of the Civil Rights Era and the subsequent de facto replacement of the original Constitution by the nebulous and ever-expanding "Civil Rights Constitution," America has been a nation on the decline: politically, culturally, and demographically. The most recent outrage perpetrated against the people of the Historic American Nation, dominating the dizzying cycle of 24/7 news headlines, is the charging of Marine Veteran Daniel Penny for the death of Jordan Neely, a homeless schizophrenic who apparently liked to randomly threaten innocent subwaygoers and occasionally impersonate Michael Jackson. I'm not going to waste time on the details of the incident, as they are freely available online, including video footage of the incident in question, which most honest people would have to admit could be legally exculpatory. But I digress.
I am, however, going to talk briefly about the state of the American judicial system. Four simple words are engraved above the doors to the Supreme Court: "Equal Justice Under Law." That's supposed to be the basic promise of our legal system: that our laws are just, and that everyone —everyone— will be held equally accountable if they break those laws. However, as Aristotle warned some two millennia ago, American justice is no longer blind, legally impartial, or even a system all that concerned with any sort of real justice. It has devolved into a court of public spectacle whose sole purpose is to appease the ever-growing restless masses. The famed Prussian general and military theorist Carl von Clausewitz, still revered today for his seminal study of warfare, On War (Vom Kriege), famously wrote, "War is the continuation of policy [politics] with other means." Along similar lines, the American justice system is rapidly becoming an extension of the state's systematic anti-White animus, perpetuated by "other [lega] means."
The purpose of any legitimate legal system is to seek justice. In the Western civilizational sense of the term, justice is the ethical principle that guides impartial, fair, and reasonable treatment under the law. It's meant to ensure the prevention of harm and the provision of appropriate remedies, ensuring that both the accuser and the accused face morally just consequences for their actions.
However, in this case, and in many other cases (see the news), the racial backgrounds of Penny and Neely come into play. Penny is White, and Neely is Black. The new revolutionary-style justice system in America has been transformed into a court of public spectacle, meant to ameliorate the perceived grievances of the growing BIPOC demographic. In Nietzschean terms, the American justice system epitomizes the philosophical principles associated with the slave morality, emphasizing conformity, obedience, and fostering resentment towards individuals in positions of power and strength. The slave morality tends to prioritize traits associated with weakness and subservience while devaluing qualities related to strength, power, and assertiveness. The current American system is that of the Nietzschean slave, not the Master.
Moreover, the slave morality is dominated and animated by what Nietzsche referred to as ressentiment; ressentiment differs from resentment. Nietzschean ressentiment refers to the experience of harboring deep-seated hostility towards a perceived source or cause of one's frustration. It involves the act of assigning blame to the alleged cause for the resulting dissatisfaction. Over the past several decades, American politics and, by extension, its system of justice has been becoming more and more racialized. In fact, it would be apt to say, again invoking Clausewitz, that the racialization of American politics, and once more, justice, is the continuation of Marxist doctrine by other means. The proletariat of Marx and Engels has been replaced by an ad-hoc coalition of people of color, while the role of bourgeois oppressor has been foisted atop the proverbial backs of White folks. As such, American justice, and justice in the entire Western world more broadly, has become more about addressing the perceived grievances and the ressentiment of peoples who are told that they are oppressed, and that this oppression is caused by their evil White overlords, who cartoonishly seek nothing more than the perpetuation of White Supremacy.
Guy Debord, the famed French philosopher, and himself a Marxist, in his fantastic book The Society of the Spectacle, examines the concept of the spectacle in the modern (postmodern) capitalist world. He argues that capitalism creates a society where the representation of reality becomes more important than actual reality. The American justice system has become a grand spectacle, meant to appease the grievances of one group against another, and thus it is no longer concerned with apparently trivial and timeless Western concepts, like the rendering of actual justice.
Will Daniel Penny receive fair and equal justice in the increasingly racialized American court of the spectacle? The answer is already preordained: No, he will not. Penny will, sadly and unfortunately, be sacrificed atop the corpse-ridden altar of American injustice, in order to appease the ever-growing ressentiment of a rapidly fragmenting American body politic.
One of the first steps necessary to revitalize America and rejuvenate its people is to resurrect the time-tested principles of true justice. Until this happens, America will continue to decline. However, there is a glimmer of hope. Perhaps the injustice that Penny is undoubtedly about to receive will act as a wakeup call, enraging Americans enough to demand real change. Or perhaps not? Only time will tell, but I however am optimistic.
Nobody can say that feeding the hungry is a "minor" activity if they know _anything_ about Christianity.
Damn Christians, their charity is slowing our drive to socialism!
I notice that many commenters here are trying to paint this as an anti-Christian action on the part of Santa Ana's government.
I doubt that is the case. I know Santa Ana pretty well. It is a fairly conservative place with plenty of born-again Christians and devout Catholics. However, it would be in character for the homeowners of Santa Ana to be concerned with lots of homeless people concentrating in one place near their properties.
The City will lose, too for abridging the free exercise of religion
As others have pointed out, the characterization of *feeding the homeless* as a "minor activity" is a most disingenuous framing. Consider Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs - food is pretty high up there, and *feeding the hungry* is explicitly encouraged by Jesus, in the Gospel.
On the other hand, a cup of coffee sure does get the bowels moving... should Micah's Way provide corresponding port-a-potties to complete the cycle that they are catalyzing, to help keep the neighbors happy?
Jesus never specified how we should help a brother who needs to take a poop.
Allow me to summarize: the City of Santa Ana allows a needle-exchange center to open on the same block as a Christian Charity, thus attracting troublesome low-life's. The then-Mayor of Santa Ana, who himself lives nearby yet foolishly authorized the needle exchange program anyway, then realizes his mistake ...and in lieu of closing-down the needle exchange center, decides instead to persecute & blame the Christian Charity ...for his own fook-up.
And there you have it: government abusing citizens YET AGAIN. Why you spineless Amerikan fookers DON'T rise-up and whack these motherfookers is totally beyond me.
People who truly care for the homeless would, in addition to giving out food and drink, have the homeless do things for their charitable donations.
The homeless could: clean up the area, pick up garbage, clean dishes, plant fruit and vegetable seeds on a plot of land owned by the charity, irrigate, cultivate, and harvest the fruits and vegetables, feed chickens and collect eggs, learn how to fish from a stocked pond, clean and cook fish, learn methods of food preservation, any number of things.
In addition to providing shelter, helpers of the homeless could also teach the homeless construction of homes, how to maintain their homes, choosing competent contractors and repair people, fight Cifty Hall zoning bureaucracy, and how to be good neighbors.
In other words, real help is helping people become self-reliant individuals who can solve their own problems. That's what I'd like to see from anybody.
Kalifornia at it again.
Offer donuts, fill the building with cops and politicians and burn it down with them inside.
Move down to the now defunct needle exchange and problem solved.
I think Rev Kirkland will be reaching for the heart medicine but this is actually old news
It was 13 years ago but..
Mayor Michael Bloomberg's food police have struck again! Outlawed are food donations to homeless shelters because the city can't assess their salt, fat and fiber content, reports
It is the Rev type of liberal that hates WHO gives the food while pretending to care about WHO would have gotten the food. It's a great scam, no commitment, everybody's wrong