Immigration Should Be as Easy for Everyone As It Is for NBA Players
How many incredible would-be immigrants are being kept out unfairly?

For a fifth straight year, the NBA's Most Valuable Player award will go to someone born outside of the United States. While the league has not yet announced the winner of the Michael Jordan Trophy, the finalists are Joel Embiid, Nikola Jokic, and Giannis Antetokounmpo. Cameroon-born Embiid (the league's leading scorer), Serbia's Jokic (the two-time reigning MVP), and Greek-Nigerian Antetokounmpo (who hoisted the trophy in 2019 and 2020) each turned in a superlative 2022–2023 campaign and has strong claim to the title.
Along with Slovenian guard Luka Doncic, who at the tender age of 24 has already made the All-NBA First Team three years running, Embiid, Jokic, and Antetokounmpo are becoming the defining faces of the NBA's global brand as presiding American titans LeBron James, Stephen Curry, and Kevin Durant approach the twilight of their careers.
These immigrant stars are still in their 20s and are just four of the 120 foreign-born players that now constitute about one-third of the league, a total that is up from just 23 such players 30 seasons ago.
This injection of foreign talent has been a boon for the NBA and, in turn, for American basketball fans. League revenue is at a record high, and quality of play is as well, by many metrics. While their pure hoops talent is key, the NBA's foreign star quartet has accelerated the adoption of new, more free-flowing, all-court playing styles borrowed from the international game that have elevated the league's on-court aesthetic.
The NBA's adoption of talented individuals from around the globe provides a lesson for the wider American economy. While the NBA has been able to poach the best players the world has to offer, other key industries like technology, manufacturing, and finance have seen their available talent pools artificially limited by misguided immigration restrictions.
Major sports leagues can sponsor immigrants from any corner of the world under a dedicated visa just for professional athletes, the P-1A visa. Without much hassle, these players can legally come live and work in the U.S. Alternatively, an internationally recognized athlete could be sponsored by an agent under an O-1A visa. And if they win major international awards while playing in the NBA, they can qualify for a green card under the EB-1 category. None of these categories are subject to any labor market tests to see if Americans are displaced from a job, and they are allowed to be expedited for a fee, making wait times a matter of days.
The result is that American pro basketball is at its zenith.
But key companies in diverse industries don't have the chance to attract the best talent from around the world like the NBA does. In most cases, other for-profit businesses must use the H-1B visa—limited to a mere 85,000 per year—to sponsor college-educated employees to work for them. Demand outstrips supply, so the U.S. government conducts a lottery for the visas which, last season, resulted in fewer than 25 percent of applicants selected. Even if companies can secure an H-1B visa for their desired worker, the green card process takes years, and if the workers happened to have been born in India, then they will never obtain a green card due to arbitrary per-country caps set by Congress.
The consequences of our current anti-merit immigration system is that companies offshore offices to countries where they can attract talent. All major U.S. tech companies have opened offices in neighboring Canada, where they send mostly Indian engineers and programmers. America isn't just missing out on these highly paid immigrants' productivity and tax revenue, but also on the money they would spend at U.S. businesses, for food, haircuts, health care, and everything else. By keeping offices in the U.S., their employers would create jobs here for Americans, such as administrative staff, construction workers, and electricians.
America's population is less than 5 percent of the world's total. There are millions more talented people living outside the U.S. than inside. Attracting the world's top talent in every field isn't just good for America's economy, it's also the most powerful tool to deprive rivals like China of economic brainpower. Welcoming immigrants to work in tech and the rest of the economy, as the NBA does, will have powerful economic benefits.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just work online and earn money. He now makes over $500 a day by working from home. I made $19,517 last month just doing this online job 2 hours a day. so easy and no special skills required…(n25) You can run google and then make this work.
.
.
For Details————————➤ http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Rosalynn - do you shave your pubes before your webcam show, or do you clean up the kitty "on-cam"?
Another thoughtful opinion. I would expand the idea to let anyone that wants to come here and give it a go. No criminals please.
I completely agree with this article. The spectacular growth and prosperity of America were made with free borders for immigration. America is a country of immigrants except for the natives that were always there. Will there be some delinquents among the incoming people? Yes, there will be some but it's inevitable, every country will have some of those whether you have open or closed borders. You can't assume people already living in the U.S.A. are 100 % honest, hard-working people, there are many dishonest Americans in your country, just the same as in any other part of the world. Migrants are people that don't give anything for granted, they migrate to fight for their future and a few of them will be exceptionally talented but, on average, almost all of them will make a positive contribution to the prosperity of the country. This is pure common sense rooted in historic facts, not some idiotic false assumption. Worried about migrants changing your current culture? Cultural diversity is also cultural wealth, besides, there's no such thing as cultural purity... not even in very culturally closed countries like Japan there's a tremendous mixing of American and European culture, this is because it is impossible to avoid.
"I completely agree with this article. The spectacular growth and prosperity of America were made with free borders for immigration..."
Prior to the welfare state rewarding those incapable of earning their keep.
Fail.
can you come up with some new arguments that are not cliches.America is a country of immigrants,blah blah blah....
Yes, every immigrant should have employers eagerly looking to pay them 45 million dollars a year.
Indeed. If they can pull down that kind of money and not be a drain, we would be more than happy to welcome them. It's the importing of destitution that is a bit galling.
I even have made $17,180 only in 30 days straightforwardly working a few easy tasks through my PC. Just when I have lost my office position, I was so perturbed but at last I’ve found this simple on-line employment & this way I could collect thousands simply from home. Any individual can try this best job and get more money online going this article…..
.
.
This Website➤----------------------------➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
I propose an “equity-solution” that the authors probably didn’t envision: NBA star immigrants = 0 Everybody else = 0
I know it’s sort of out-dated and probably now considered to be an indication of being a hater, but language and culture are what makes a nation, and having an enforced border is what protects language and culture. Lack of a functioning border and unwillingness to defend one’s culture indicates the loss of a society’s will to live. A lot of people at some point “down the road” will come to regret “the trip” they have elected, but having voted themselves into the dystopia that they find themselves slogging along in and have come to regret, they will find that having voted for or acceded to, they can not then vote themselves out of it.
And as a boomer, I will be little affected other than having upcoming hours of drama to watch. Eventually it will reach the level of sturm und drang. I hope the popcorn holds out – I really like freshly popped popcorn with melted butter while I watch drama, and there’s going to be lots of drama to watch.
No. I agree with reason here. Only let the millionaires come over while the no job low paid club leagues stay on their home countries. Same thing the NBA does. They pick and choose top talent and don't bother with the worse players.
Sounds like reason is now pro job based immigration and not lottery based immigration.
Deal.
At the other end for REASON's spectrum is businesses, wanting to pay as little as possible, versus what Americans would expect for the same job, they would be denied when the immigrant was allowed in.
Only immigrant's who can show they are able to support themselves,no criminal record,have a skill this country needs. No others!
Attracting the world's top talent in every field isn't just good for America's economy, it's also the most powerful tool to deprive rivals like China of economic brainpower.
Who is this supposed to appease with this statement?
I don't know, because it's pretty common for Chinese to be willing spies or engage in industrial espionage; and some not-so-willing who are extorted by threats against families still in China. We're not draining anything from China by importing more pawns of the CCP, we're hastening the draining of the US advantage.
How many incredible would-be immigrants are being kept out unfairly?
On the flip side, how many POS immigrants are being kept out justly?
More of the latter than the former, I'd imagine.
And now that we will permit illegals claiming to be trannies in, it will get worse.
On the flip-flip side, how many POS illegal migrants walk into the country every day?
Immigrant's coming across the border now are illiterate pennyless.Drain our resources.
Curious how you would define "illiterate"...
Yes, standing around at the southern border in a crowd of 40000 people with measles, TB, syphilis, gonorrhoea, leprosy, polio, cholera, diphtheria, scabies, chicken pox, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections and who will immediately file for welfare and then disappear with their government-issued iPhones is an infallible sign of invaluable talent. Why, they could all be writers for "Reason"!
If you're running short of gardeners, just go to the nearest Home Depot parking lot.
I'm pretty sure the Reason staff is holding a "mendacious arguments" contest and posting their entries on the site.
Or perhaps the Reason staff is handling their investments and sex lives the same way: promisculous, indiscriminate, and bankrupt.
For the NBA, the obvious solution is to export the entire operation to China. Chairman Xi already controls all of these human gargantuan dribblers. I am sure they (and we) will be more satisfied with a leveling of this obviously white-privileged sport.
What about the WNBA?
We deprived Russia's prison system of some top-tier talent.
Plenty of high school boys teams available to wipe the court with the women professionals.
There goes the plot for a great film adaptation, The Longest Free Throw.
Send them too!
Nothing better than buying citizenship.
Let’s see:
Sponsored? check.
Job? check.
Self-supporting? check.
Talented? check.
Contributing to the economy and the tax base? check.
No known medical issues? check.
Reason – “Why do we make it so easy for them to get in?”
Uhh….
So you want some bureaucrat to decide who can enter our country based on arbitrary criteria such as the list you provided? This is a Libertarian publication, and we Libertarians support the free movement of peoples instead of random bureaucrats deciding.
Canada uses that basic system.
The libertarian version of open borders requires reciprocity. America opening borders without Canada and Mexico doing the same is not libertarian.
I don't hear any of the anti-lawful immigration crowd talking about my right to cross other borders. Just other people's right to cross ours.
Haha. What, you don’t think that the message scribbled on the Statue of Liberty 150 years ago should apply to todays world of 8 billion people?
Racist!
Libertarian ideals require no reciprocity at all. Extend freedom to everyone you are able to. The country has room for way more people. People who want to be free will move here, and eventually replace all the progressives.
Libertarian ideals require that the state stop taking my money to support semi-literate third world migrants and their kids BEFORE you open the borders to millions more of them.
No. I think we should set a quota of immigrant visas and auction them off every year to the highest bidders. No bureaucrat involved, pure free market. The minimum bid should be 10x the per capita government spending in the US.
You are not a "libertarian", you're a f*cking leftist.
No, I want people coming in to meet that basic criteria. Otherwise it is mine and your dime that is taking them on. In that free movement of people over borders what part of the equation is free for me?
Are you okay with this list?
Let’s see:
not sponsored? check.
no job, nowhere to live? check.
expecting immediate government support? check.
Basic skills or none at all? check.
Bringing children that need food, housing, education? check
Negative hit to the tax base – pay minimal taxes through consumption? check.
Medical issues that require treatment and no resources for the treatment? check.
If so, why?
Arbitrary or not, those are the criteria I want immigrants selected for admission on. And if a bureaucrat will enforce them impartially and rigorously, I am all in favor of that bureaucrat.
Pretty much every libertarian here has said we're fine with open borders, just as soon as the welfare state is dismantled. I'm not opposed to free movement, I'm opposed to being forced to pay for imported poverty (not to mention home-grown poverty).
How many incredible would-be immigrants are being kept out unfairly?
Not nearly enough!
"Immigration Should Be as Easy for Everyone As It Is for NBA Players"
And mandatory minimum wages should be as high.
What Are The Requirements To Migrate To Australia?
Before we look any further, we should first start by considering some of the most basic requirements of migrating to Australia. Of course, the exact requirements you will need to fulfill will vary depending on the type of visa you have chosen since every visa is intended for a slightly different purpose. All the same, it’s worth considering that some of the most basic requirements you will need to meet to migrate to Australia usually include the following:
1. Hold a suitable job or education offer from an employer or university within Australia
2. Be able to speak English to a suitably high standard, as proven by language tests
3. Obtain a minimum of 65 points on the Australian work visa application
4. Be under the age of 45 years for an Australian work visa Ideally, you should have experience in an industry that is currently on the “in-demand” list for skilled job roles
5. Be able to support yourself financially during your time in Australia, ensuring you won’t need to rely on subsidies and support from the Government
Be up to date with any necessary vaccinations and the like to enable entry into Australia; your doctor should be able to provide you with a reference as to your health and vaccination status.
Of course, we should also point out at this point that if you’re planning to migrate to Australia, you will also need to be able to pay the relevant fees. Generally, though, obtaining a visa to migrate to Australia isn’t drastically expensive, so these fees shouldn’t be too much of an issue for most people.
This is what immigration should be, not a pell-mell of who gets to the border first.
Tom Lehrer's intro to "It Make's a Fella Proud to be a Soldier" mentioned the "ideal" of ending discrimination on not only grounds of race, creed and color, but also on the grounds of ability. Anyone who doesn't know a shelter half from an entrenching tool and wants in can swap his switchblade and his old zip gun for a bayonet and a new AR-15. Join the army, travel to faraway places, meet strange new people and kill them, and become an, um, 'Murrican!
It's okay, because they're only taking jobs Americans don't want. Oh, wait....
Everybody with extraordinary ability can easily get an immigrant visa to the US; there are several visa categories for that.
You know what is making immigration for those people a pain, though? The fact that idiots like you are flooding the system with people who are decidedly below average and will likely become a public charge.
I agree.
And what is fair and what is unfair? Who decides what is fair and unfair? Is it up to the writers at Reason? You would think those that apply first and go through the proper legal process would be more fair than those illegally crossing the border getting in first. What kind of citizen will an immigrant make if their first act in the new country is to break the new countries law?
No one has a guaranteed right to immigrate to another country.
With millions of illegals streaming across the border every year, limiting legal immigration to 85k skilled laborers is insane.
Going with Trump on locking down the border and enforcing existing labor laws (where are 30 million illegals working and paying taxes?) while simultaneously allowing more legal immigration of "the best and brightest" would be infinitely preferable to our current policy of unlimited immigration for people who won't follow the law to work for companies willing to skirt the law while denying access to high value workers.
Our economy needs more of the best and brightest from overseas?
You guys sound exactly like Trump.
What an odd turn of events. Suddenly wanting to make it easy to import skilled labor is not fascist, I suppose.
I have really struggled to understand the US consensus on immigration, which seems to be to protect high skilled jobs from immigration with these H1-b caps, while allowing unlimited illegal immigration. It seems to be the worst of both worlds.
And the net of Reason's advocacy is this same policy, despite an underlying desire for simply unlimited movement across borders.
I'm not sure which Reason article you read, but the one you're commenting under said nothing about "unlimited movement across borders" or "unlimited illegal immigration". Perhaps therein lies the key to your struggle to understand?
"How many incredible would-be immigrants are being kept out unfairly?"
NOT as many as every other large nation on the planet....
"incredible" isn't defined as Invaders pushing to conquer the USA with Nazism.
I thought they were Marxists?
“Immigration should be as easy for everyone as it is for elite athletes” is such a dumb fucking proposal I can’t be bothered to muster a retort. I don't want a bunch of fucking bums from the third world shitting up the street corner. Fuck you.
These immigration articles are so amusing.
Positions like this are precisely what propelled me from libertarianism to alt-right neo-Fascism.
Indeed.
How many incredible would-be immigrants are being kept out unfairly?
Zero. There is nothing "unfair" about a country choosing which potential immigrants to admit or exclude. No foreigner has any right to come here.
immigration should not be easy. we should have a strict set of criteria for anyone wanting to immigrate to the us. it should be merit based and the applicant must have skills that we need. the numbers we allow into the country should be governed by our needs and the state of the economy. no one has a right to come here -- period.
Exactly. The constant unregulated flow of immigration must stop. Those that support it are promoting abuse. I'm no fan of the right but the left is full of elitist abusers. Regulated immigration is the ONLY compassionate way to address the immigration issue. And yes, it should be easier but it should also be merit based. The welfare state will die with the current rate of illegal immigration, if it's not too late already. I get that a lot of Libertarians are against the welfare state, but a safety net is important to provide for those in society that slip through the cracks. When the amount of those below the cracks get larger than those above, things will break.
I'm all for immigration as soon as we cut off all social services.
Sure you are.
No one votes for their own "replacement".
Immigration opponents are losers and failures. You are sitting on the bench with your .095 batting average, worried that the team is bringing in better players.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
You can check this out
https://boomerwomensworld.com/