Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Sports

Stadium Subsidy Stupidity Hits New Record

Taxpayers are on the hook for $1.26 billion for a new stadium in Nashville.

Jason Russell | 4.26.2023 3:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
A Houston Texans player runs with the football, trying to evade a Tennessee Titans player. | Matthew Maxey/Icon Sportswire DHH/Matthew Maxey/Icon Sportswire/Newscom
(Matthew Maxey/Icon Sportswire DHH/Matthew Maxey/Icon Sportswire/Newscom)

The Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County voted in the wee hours on Wednesday morning to spend $1.26 billion in taxpayer money on a new government-owned stadium. That figure not only puts locals on the hook for more than half of the stadium's estimated $2.1 billion cost, but it also sets a new record for the largest stadium subsidy in U.S. history.

Supporters of the new domed stadium say tourists will pay that money back, not locals. The Tennessean reports that Council Member Zulfat Suara "voted in favor because she prefers tourists to bear the tax burden of stadium construction and upkeep (through sales, ticket and hotel taxes) instead of Davidson County taxpayers." On top of a 1 percent hotel tax increase, sales taxes paid in and around the stadium (as well as ticket taxes and fees) will be used to repay $500 million in bonds from the state government and $760 million in bonds from Nashville's Sports Authority.

That logic sounds good until you consider fans of the NFL's Tennessee Titans presumably live in Tennessee, if not mostly in Nashville and Davidson County. The fees and taxes also drive up costs for business travelers and visitors who aren't attending stadium events. Meanwhile, several special events are exempt from the new 3-percent ticket fee: Country Music Association events, Academy of Country Music events, the Grammy Awards, and World Wrestling Entertainment events.

The problem with the new stadium, like the current Nissan Stadium, is not just who pays for it, but who owns it, and that's the The Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County. It's unclear if the Metropolitan Council ever considered getting out of the stadium business and simply asking the billionaire owner of the Titans to pay for the team's own upgrade. This is not an impossible task: SoFi Stadium outside Los Angeles is the most expensive stadium ever built and reportedly had no direct government subsidies. It's probably the finest stadium in the world and routinely hosts special events.

Supporters say that with Nashville on the hook for the upkeep of the current stadium, it's cheaper to start fresh instead of upgrading Nissan Stadium. But the government never really looked into how much an upgrade that fulfilled Nashville's obligations would cost, only relying on one estimate provided by the Tennessee Titans owner of how much it would cost to build her dream stadium.

It used to be that NFL team owners would threaten to move their teams and local governments would instead open their wallets for a shiny new stadium—now governments are tripping over themselves to give over $1 billion in subsidies to NFL owners who aren't even threatening to move.

Fans won't even get a bigger stadium: The new one will seat 60,000 people, which is about 9,000 seats fewer than the current stadium and will be the smallest capacity in the NFL. The city is building a smaller stadium rather than renovating one the state owes money on through 2029.

Nashville's $1.26 billion football stadium subsidy surpasses the $1 billion taxpayer subsidy for a new Buffalo Bills stadium approved last year. The stadium subsidy arms race never ends.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Disney Sues Ron DeSantis, Claiming 'Targeted Campaign of Retaliation'

Jason Russell is managing editor at Reason and author of the Free Agent sports newsletter.

SportsstadiumsSubsidiesTennesseeNashvilleFootballCrony Capitalism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (34)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

    "The new one will seat 60,000 people, which is about 9,000 seats fewer than the current stadium and will be the smallest capacity in the NFL."

    Yeah, but what about the luxury suites? Mucho dineros for someone. And gotta have room for the bars and restaurants inside of it.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

      Not to mention you don't want local TV blackouts because you don't sell out.

      1. KseniyaSondra   2 years ago (edited)

        Earning extra $15,000 or more online while working part-time is a quick, simple way to make money. I made $17,000 last month from working in my spare time, and I’m now really content as a result of this job. You can do this right now by following.

        SITE. ——>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com

        1. Loretta_Vasquez   2 years ago (edited)

          I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
          🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

          Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM

  2. Jerry B.   2 years ago

    But it’s not really your money, so you have no say in how it’s spent.

    1. SQRLSY One   2 years ago

      $Bazzilions of tax dollars for stadiums for ritualized violence, and we the taxpayers are forced to pay it... Baseball, football, etc.; they are all ritualized violence…
      Can we just spare a bare few million for ritualized sex, too, at the local naked-titty-dancing club? A little CHOICE here, please?
      Ritualized sex is FAR less likely to result in cracked ribs & broken spines & damaged brains than football (which we pay for through health insurance), BUT, NOOOO, no tax dollars for ritualized sex... Tax dollars to SHUT HER DOWN!
      How do we start a movement, Free the Naked Titties-Skin, Just Say NO to Pigskin!

      1. AbbyPavy   2 years ago (edited)

        Just work online and earn money. He now makes over $500 a day by working from home. I made $19,517 last month just doing this online job 2 hours a day. so easy and no special skills required…(n25) You can run google and then make this work.
        .
        .

        More information can be found here……… https://Www.Coins71.Com

  3. Milling   2 years ago

    I am a long time fan of the Titans, and I agree with you, ridiculous that the taxpayers are on the hook for this type of expense. How can something costing this much money not go up for a city wide vote?

    1. Rise of the Impedance   2 years ago (edited)

      How can something costing this much money not go up for a city wide vote?
      Surprisingly, voters are not quite that stupid. Any vote would lose big, forcing the team to move back to Houston. Then the local politicians will not be wined-and-dined in the luxury boxes and they will be sad.

      Reference: San Diego Chargers

  4. creech   2 years ago

    Dick move. "Let's tax the folks coming here for Aunt Joanie's funeral to help a billionaire football owner."

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

      Always the way. We the People's government issues a $billion in bond debt and says "Don't worry. Someone else is going to pay it off."

  5. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    Fauci says he never locked anything down, and has never heard of COVID.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a testy exchange with an interviewer for Meet the Press last week, Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed he never locked down schools and hasn't even heard of COVID.

    "COVID? I've never even heard of such a thing! What is COVID? That sounds made up!" said the former NIAID Director and COVID advisor to the President. "And I certainly had nothing to do with locking down schools and destroying kids' learning and development for over a year. What kind of monster would do something like that? You must have me confused with someone else."

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Defense by insanity? It just might work...

      1. SRG   2 years ago

        It's the Babylon Bee.

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          Buzzkill.

  6. jimc5499   2 years ago

    Ever notice the common denominator for these cities that vote to build these stadiums? Democrats.
    The City of Pittsburgh built Three Rivers Stadium in the early 70's. When it was torn down the City still owed money on it. They owed because they kept refinancing it to make the City's finances look good. Reason never mentions that.

    1. tennvol   2 years ago

      I don't know the makeup of the Nashville Metro government, but that city is hardly a Democrat bastion.

      1. Ride 'Em   2 years ago

        I'm from Tennessee and the two blue areas are Memphis and Nashville. Nashville is where one of suspended state legislators. It is also the city where a corrupt mayor from California was forced to resign.

        Trust me, democrats control Nashville.

  7. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

    Reason has already covered this.

    1. SpringTressa   2 years ago (edited)

      Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..

      For more detail visit the given link………………..>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com

  8. Longtobefree   2 years ago

    "voted in favor because she prefers tourists to bear the tax burden of stadium construction and upkeep (through sales, ticket and hotel taxes) instead of Davidson County taxpayers."

    Those aren't the only two choices!

  9. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

    'The Tennessean reports that Council Member Zulfat Suara "voted in favor because she prefers tourists to bear the tax burden of stadium construction and upkeep (through sales, ticket and hotel taxes) instead of Davidson County taxpayers."'

    Mostly she prefers to sit in a luxury box and tour the locker room after the game.

  10. Jerryskids   2 years ago

    Thanks Joe Biden! You got to take inflation into account, even the price of bread and circuses is up astronomically.

  11. Sevo   2 years ago

    "...Supporters of the new domed stadium say tourists will pay that money back, not locals..."

    They'll be here all week, folks, and tip the staff well, please.

  12. Ride 'Em   2 years ago

    Long time Titans fan and I think this is outrageous. Its why billionaires own the teams and multi-millionaires play for those teams.

  13. Iwanna Newname   2 years ago

    But.........but.........d e m o c r a c y!

  14. SpringTressa   2 years ago (edited)

    Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..

    For more detail visit the given link………………..>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com

  15. Reason is rare   2 years ago

    $35,000 per seat, that someone will use a couple hours a week. My house suddenly looks like a bargain.

    "Hey Joe, what you buy for your backyard?"

    " Oh, a $35,000 chair that I will use less than an hour a week".

  16. CE   2 years ago

    Nissan Stadium was built in 1999. It's not even old yet. It only cost 290 million, and seemed to serve its purpose well. And it's in Nashville, not some giant city with money to burn. Bilk the tourists? Nashville depends on tourists, not a smart move.

    1. Ride 'Em   2 years ago

      500 million of the government money comes from the state. Tourists won't pay that money. Further the Titans and NFL have a problem on the special ticket tax.

      Another problem is that higher hotel taxes, etc. are not exclusive NFL fans but all visitors to Nashville. Nashville may continue to price itself out of the convention business.

      1. beko   2 years ago (edited)

        I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE. I hope you also got what I...go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart...... 

        SITE. —> ustdking

  17. Liberty Lover   2 years ago

    Not that it is right, but at least these are major cites. Tiny little Green Bay and surrounding Brown County got raped for the update of Lambeau field. It was even extended for the Packers after the original term. They taxed a half of percent on sales. That doesn't seem like that much until you start thinking about the price of say a new car or truck. At least Brewer Stadium taxed 4 counties that surrounded Milwaukee because they all saw economic gain from the stadium. As far as I am concerned they all could have moved. Until government entities start saying no this will continue. If they all just said no, these teams would have no leverage and just have to pay for their own stadiums, which they have more than enough money to do.

  18. TangoDelta   2 years ago (edited)

    “voted in favor because she prefers tourists to bear the tax burden of stadium construction and upkeep”

    That’s just mental masturbation of the third kind.

    1st kind: If I build it, they will come.

    2nd kind: If you build it, I will come.

    3rd kind: If I can con you into believing that someone else will build it, we can all come!

  19. MilikusFlorium   2 years ago

    That's actually too much, and I have no idea how they're going to explain all the costs because I think if the new stadium is smaller, there are definitely going to be some problems. At least, I hope it'll be open for citizens to run in the mornings or something like that because I know that it's getting pretty common. I run almost every day, and Step App helps me monetize physical activity. It's relevant, since now many people have problems with activity.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!